Community Engagement Survey...Highly Qualified, Effective Faculty and Staff Direction Four Home,...

The right choice forENDLESS OPPORTUNITIES.

#TeamSISDLeading • Inspiring • InnovatingSocorro Independent School District

2015-16

Community Engagement Survey

2

Introduction 4

District Rating 5

Elementary Schools 6

PK-8 Schools 14

Middle Schools 16

High Schools 19

Alternative Schools 22

2015-2016 SISD Community Engagement Survey 23

Table of Contents

3

Socorro ISD Board of TrusteesTexas Honor Board • Region 19 Board of the YearThe Socorro ISD Board of Trustees consists of seven elected citizens who work with community leaders, families, and educators to develop sound educational policies that support student achievement and ensure the solvency of the District. They have been named twice as the Region 19 Board of the Year in 2012 and 2015. The SISD Board also earned the prestigious title of 2015 Texas Honor Board, being recognized for their commitment to their students and community, a continued focus on student achievement and improvement, and high ethical standards in governing the school district. Together, they are a strong and cohesive team that helps the district continuously set and achieve new levels of excellence. Five of the trustees represent single-member districts and two are elected at-large.

VisionTomorrow’s Leaders Learning Today

MissionThe mission of the Socorro Independent School District is to optimize our students’ academic, artistic, athletic, and interpersonal skills.

SISD Strategic PlanSISD’s Strategic Plan guides the day-to-day work of Team SISD in order to meet the district’s overarching goal of ensuring 100 percent of students graduate from high school prepared for the college and career of their choice. The plan was developed to move the district forward while meeting the needs of SISD’s students, parents and broader community, and serves as the pathways to success while focusing on improving academic achievement of all students. SISD’s Strategic Plan includes five directions:

Direction OneSafe and Supportive Learning Environment

Direction TwoCollege and Career Readiness

Direction ThreeHighly Qualified, Effective Faculty and Staff

Direction FourHome, School, Community Partnerships

Direction FiveAccountability For ALL

Michael A. NajeraTrustee

Hector F. GonzalezTrustee

Angelica RodriguezTrustee

Antonio ‘Tony’ AyubTrustee

Gary GandaraBoard President

Paul GuerraBoard Vice President

Cynthia Ann NajeraBoard Secretary

4

Socorro Independent School District is committed to maintaining strong home, school and community partnerships in order to increase student academic and behavioral achievement. In accordance with Texas Education Code (TEC) § 39.545(a), SISD self-evaluated and assigned performance ratings for community and student engagement indicators based on results from the 2015-2016 SISD Community Engagement Survey.

The survey results for the district and for each campus in SISD are available in this document. Also available in this document is a sample of the survey that was completed by each campus.

SISD formulated a committee of district personnel* in order to review and revise the criteria used last year. The Texas Association of School Administrators provided school districts guidance and possible criteria to develop the survey, which SISD took into consideration when developing the survey. The SISD staff members reviewed all of the criteria to ensure it was relevant and could be used to improve the district’s performance.

Once the survey was revised, administrators received a link via Survey Monkey to access and complete with their School Improvement Teams (SIT). All schools were surveyed in the nine areas listed below:

1. Fine Arts2. Wellness and Physical Education3. Community and parental involvement4. 21st Century workforce development program5. Second language acquisition program6. Digital learning environment7. Dropout prevention strategies8. Educational programs for GT students9. Compliance with statutory reporting and policy requirements

The campuses then assigned a rating of 1 = Unacceptable, 2 = Acceptable, 3 = Recognized, or 4 = Exemplary for each of the areas, except for area nine (compliance), which received a rating of either Yes or No.

If you have any questions regarding the survey or you would like to be on the committee to develop additional questions for the nine areas on the SISD Community Engagement Survey for the 2016-2017 school year, please contact the Department of State and Federal Programs’ Assistant Director, Fernie Vasquez, at [email protected] or at (915) 937-1600.

SISD always encourages parents and community members to get involved, and appreciates your continued support in helping the district realize its vision of Tomorrow’s Leaders Learning Today.

*The staff members who participated in the development of the SISD Community Engagement Survey were: Fine Arts – Don Rominsky, Bilingual Education Department – Jennifer Davila, Department of State and Federal Programs – Jeanette Williams and Fernie Vasquez, Guidance and Counseling – Tammi Mackeben, Career and Technology Education (CTE) – George Thomas, Athletics Department – Albert Hernandez, Advanced Academic Gifted and Talented Program – Rosario Rojas, Technology Services Department – Miguel Moreno and Hector Reyna, Department of Research and Evaluation – Kelly McBain, Nurse Manager – Rebecca Madrid, Child Nutritional Services – Shelley Chenausky.

2015-2016 SISD Community Engagement Survey

5n Americas Boundary n Eastlake Boundary n El Dorado Boundary n Montwood Boundary n Pebble Hills Boundary n Socorro Boundary

District ResultsSOCORRO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

Fine Arts Recognized

Second Language Acquisition Exemplary

Community and Parental Involvement Exemplary

Wellness and Physical Education Recognized

Gifted and Talented Recognized

Dropout Prevention Recognized

Digital Learning Recognized

Compliance Yes

21st Century Workforce Recognized

Overall Results Recognized


Elementary SchoolsBENITO MARTINEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Fine Arts Acceptable

Second Language Acquisition Recognized

Community and Parental Involvement Recognized





Compliance Yes

21st Century Workforce Acceptable


CAMPESTRE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized



Wellness and Physical Education Exemplary


Dropout Prevention Exemplary


Compliance Yes

21st Century Workforce Exemplary

Overall Results Exemplary

CHESTER E. JORDAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized




Gifted and Talented Exemplary



Compliance Yes




Elementary SchoolsDR. SUE SHOOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



ELFIDA P. CHAVEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes



ESCONTRIAS EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTERFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




Elementary SchoolsESCONTRIAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



H.D. HILLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



HELEN BALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized

Second Language Acquisition Acceptable






Compliance Yes




Elementary SchoolsHORIZON HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



HUECO ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes



HURSHEL ANTWINE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized






Digital Learning Acceptable

Compliance Yes




Elementary SchoolsJAMES P. BUTLER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL







Digital Learning Exemplary

Compliance Yes



KEYS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts N/A







Compliance Yes



LOMA VERDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




Elementary SchoolsLUJAN-CHAVEZ ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



MISSION RIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



MYRTLE COOPER ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes




Elementary SchoolsO’SHEA KELEHER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Fine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes



PURPLE HEART ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes



ROBERT R. ROJAS ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




Elementary SchoolsSGT. ROBERTO ITUARTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



SIERRA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes



VISTA DEL SOL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




PK-8 SchoolsBILL SYBERT SCHOOL

Fine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes



DESERT WIND SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes



ERNESTO SERNA SCHOOLFine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes




PK-8 SchoolsJANE A. HAMBRIC SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



JOHN DRUGAN SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



PASO DEL NORTE SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




Middle SchoolsCAPT. WALTER E. CLARKE MIDDLE








Compliance Yes



COL. JOHN O. ENSOR MIDDLEFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



MONTWOOD MIDDLEFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




Middle SchoolsSALVADOR H. SANCHEZ MIDDLE

Fine Arts Acceptable







Compliance Yes



SOCORRO MIDDLEFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



SPC. RAFAEL HERNANDO III MIDDLEFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes




Middle SchoolsSSG. MANUEL PUENTES MIDDLE





Gifted and Talented Acceptable



Compliance Yes



SUN RIDGE MIDDLEFine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes



WILLIAM D. SLIDER MIDDLEFine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes




High SchoolsAMERICAS HIGH SCHOOL

Fine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes



EASTLAKE HIGH SCHOOLFine Arts Exemplary





Dropout Prevention Acceptable


Compliance Yes



EL DORADO HIGH SCHOOLFine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes




High SchoolsMISSION EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL








Compliance Yes



MONTWOOD HIGH SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized







Compliance Yes



PEBBLE HILLS HIGH SCHOOLFine Arts Exemplary







Compliance Yes




High SchoolsOPTIONS HIGH SCHOOL

Fine Arts N/A


Community and Parental Involvement Acceptable





Compliance Yes



SOCORRO HIGH SCHOOLFine Arts Recognized





Dropout Prevention Acceptable


Compliance Yes




Alternative SchoolsKEYS ACADEMY

Fine Arts N/A







Compliance Yes



23

Fine Arts

2015 - 2016 SISD Community Engagement Survey

Please Select

Campus

1. Please Select Campus:*

Unacceptable - 2 or

less opportunities

Acceptable - 3

opportunities

Recognized - 4

opportunities

Exemplary - 5

opportunities N/A

Performance Measure

2. Special Events or Cultural opportunity participation. Ex. guest speakers, artists or musicians/field trips for

cultural development (All levels)

*

Unacceptable - 4 or

less opportunities

Acceptable -

Primary - 5

Elementary - 7

Middle School - 8

High School - 12

opportunities

Recognized -

Primary - 10

Elementary - 14

Middle School - 16

High School 24

opportunities

Exemplary -

Primary - 15

Elementary - 21

Middle School - 24

High School 36

opportunities N/A

Performance Measure

3. Exhibition / Performance opportunities (All levels)

Performance Measure

*

Unacceptable -

Less than 30% of

students are

enrolled in fine arts

courses / classes.

Acceptable - 30% to

59% of students are


courses / classes.

Recognized - 60%

to 69% of students


courses / classes.

Exemplary - 70% or

more of students


courses / classes. N/A

Performance Measure

4. Participation of students in Fine Arts courses. (middle schools and high schools only) *

24

Unacceptable -

Less than 50% of

students are

continuing Fine Arts

Acceptable - 51% -

69 % of students are


Recognized - 70%-

80% of students are


Exemplary - Greater

than 80% of

students are

continuing Fine Arts N/A

Performance Measure

5. Percent of students continuing Fine Arts compared to preceding year. (middle schools and high schools

only)

*

Unacceptable -

Less than 20%

participation of Fine

Arts students in

competition.

Acceptable - 20% to

49% participation of

Fine Arts students in

competition.

Recognized - 50 to

65% participation of

Fine Arts students in

competition.

Exemplary - More

than 65%

participation of Fine

Arts students in

competition. N/A

Performance Measure

6. Participation in UIL or district supported competition opportunities. TMEA All Region -

Band/Choir/Orchestra Visual Arts - VASE Regional Competition. (middle schools and high schools only)

*

Unacceptable - Did

not participate in UIL

Fine Arts

Competition

Acceptable - All

Participating groups

received

performance ratings

of Average,

Excellent or

Superior

Recognized - All


received

performance ratings

of Excellent or

Superior

Exemplary - All


received

performance ratings

of Superior N/A

Performance Measure

7. Fine Arts UIL or district supported competition outcome group. (middle schools and high schools only) *

Unacceptable - Did

not participate in UIL

Fine Arts

Competition

Acceptable - 12 or

more students

earned district

acknowledgement

Recognized - 10 or

more students

earned

regional/area

acknowledgement

Exemplary - 2 or

more students

qualified for state N/A

Performance Measure

8. Fine Arts UIL or district supported competition outcome individual. (high schools only)*

25

Second Language Acquisition Survey


Unacceptable - 0

Opportunities for

ELL students

to participate in

extra-curricular

school activities

Acceptable - 1-3

Opportunities for

ELL students to

participate in extra-

curricular school

activities

Recognized - 4-5

Opportunities for

ELL students

to participate in

extra-curricular

school activities

Exemplary - 6+

Opportunities for

ELL students

to participate in

extra-curricular

school activities N/A

Performance Measure

1. Opportunities for ELL students to participate in extra-curricular activities. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - 0

parental

involvement

opportunities are

planned for ELL

students/parents

Acceptable - At least

1 parental

involvement

opportunity is

planned for ELL

students/parents

Recognized - At

least 2 parental

involvement

opportunities are

planned for ELL

students/parents

Exemplary -3 or

more parental

involvement

opportunities are

planned for ELL

students/parents N/A

Performance Measure

2. Parent involvement opportunities for parents of ELL students. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

Tutoring is not

offered at campus

Acceptable - 1-3

tutorials are offered

to ELL students on

campus

Recognized - 4-5


to ELL students on

campus

Exemplary - More

than 6 tutorials are

offered to ELL

students on campus N/A

Performance Measure

3. Tutoring opportunities for ELL students. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

Teachers do not

utilize sheltered

instructional

strategies

Acceptable -

Teachers utilize

sheltered

instructional

strategies for 1 day

of the week

Recognized -

Teachers utilize

sheltered

instructional

strategies for 2 days

of the week

Exemplary -

Teachers utilize

sheltered

instructional

strategies for 3 or

more days of the

week N/A

Performance Measure

4. Utilizing sheltered instruction, ELPS strategies and PLD's within instruction. (All levels)*

26

Unacceptable -

Language tools are

not provided for

students

Acceptable -

Language tools are

made available for

students in at least

one content area

Recognized -

Language tools are

made available for


two content areas

Exemplary -

Language tools are

made available for


three or more

content areas N/A

Performance Measure

5. Availability of language acquisition support tools for students. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

LPACs are not held

at campus and

documentation is

not in order

Acceptable - LPACs

are held once a

semester and

documentation is

somewhat in order

Recognized -

LPACs are held

once a month and

documentation is

generally kept in

order

Exemplary - LPACs

are held once a

month and more

often when items

need to be

addressed;

documentation is

always in order and

in compliance N/A

Performance Measure

6. LPAC meetings and documentation in compliance. (All levels)*

27

Community and Parental Involvement


Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

parents received

policy

Acceptable - 71-

79% of parents

received policy

Recognized - 80-

89% of parents

received policy

Exemplary - 90-

100% of parents

received policy N/A

Community and

Parental Involvement

1. Distribution of District Parental Involvement Policy. (All levels) *

Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

parents received

policy

Acceptable - 71-

79% of parents

received policy

Recognized - 80-

89% of parents

received

Exemplary - 90-

100% of parents

received policy N/A

Community and


2. Distribution of Campus Parental Involvement Policy. (All levels) *

Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

parents received

compact

Acceptable - 70 to

79% of parents

received compact

Recognized - 80 to

89% of parents

received compact

Exemplary - 90-

100% of parents

received compact N/A

Community and


3. Distribution and collection of Student/Parent/Teacher Compacts to all parents with required signatures

(All levels)

*

Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

parents received

survey

Acceptable - 70 to

79% of parents

received survey

Recognized - 80-

89% of parents

received survey

Exemplary - 90-

100% of parents

received survey N/A

Community and


4. A survey regarding available parenting classes and workshops was provided to parents. (All levels) *

28

Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

parents received

notice

Acceptable - 70-

79% of parents

received notice

Recognized - 80-

89% of parents

received notice

Exemplary - 90-

100% of parents

received notice N/A

Community and


5. Provided notice to parents of students in testing grade levels of STAAR requirements and expectations.

(All levels)

*

Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

parents received

notice

Acceptable - 70-

79% of parents

received notice

Recognized - 80-

89% of parents

received notice

Exemplary - 90-

100% of parents

received notice N/A

Community and


6. Provided notice to parents of Highly Qualified Teachers. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - Did not

convene a Title I Annual

meeting Acceptable - N/A

Recognized - Held one

annual meeting

Exemplary - Held two

annual meetings

Community and


7. Campus convened Title I, Annual Meeting with parents. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - Did

not hold any

parent/teacher

conference

Acceptable - Held 1

parent/teacher

conference

Recognized - Held 2

parent/teacher

conference

Exemplary - Held 3

or more

parent/teacher

conference N/A

Community and


8. Held a parent/teacher conference during 1st and 2nd semester. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - Held

8 workshops

throughout the year

Acceptable - Held

16 workshops

throughout the year

Recognized - Held

20 workshops

throughout the year

Exemplary - Held

28 workshops

throughout the year N/A

Community and


9. Offered workshops and trainings for parents on literacy, technology, bullying prevention and student

achievement. (All levels)

*

29

Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

parents receive

information

Acceptable - 70-

79% of parents

receive information

Recognized - 80-

89% of parents

receive information

Exemplary - 90-

100% of parents

receive information N/A

Community and


10. Communicated with parents of participating children regarding school and parent program information

or activities in language they understand. (All levels)

*

30

Wellness & Physical Ed.


Unacceptable -

Less than 89% of

students are taught

sexuality curriculum

in school.

Acceptable - 90-

94%% of students

are taught sexuality

curriculum in school

Recognized - 95-

99% of students are

taught sexuality

curriculum in school

Exemplary - 100%

of students are

taught sexuality

curriculum in school N/A

Performance Measure

1. Middle school and /or high school students are taught sexuality curriculum. (middle schools and high

schools only)

*

Unacceptable -

School gym is open

and accessible 89%

or less during

regular school days.

(non-testing days)

Acceptable - School

gym is open and

accessible 90-94%

during regular

school days. (non-

testing days)

Recognized -

School gym is open

and accessible 95-

99% during regular

school days. (non-

testing days)

Exemplary - School

gym is open and

accessible 100%

during regular

school days. (non-

testing days) N/A

Performance Measure

2. The school gym is accessible and supervised during lunch. (middle schools and high schools only)*

Unacceptable - 89%

or less of incidents

and reports on

bullying are followed

up on

Acceptable - 90-

94% of incidents

and reports on

bullying are followed

up on

Recognized - 95-

99% of incidents

and reports on

bullying are

followed up on

Exemplary - 100%

of incidents and

reports on bullying

are followed up on N/A

Performance Measure

3. Campus staff follows up on all bullying incidents and reports to ensure student safety. (All levels)*

31

Unacceptable -

Before and after

school programs

that contain physical

activity are offered

89% of the time or

less during the

school year.

Acceptable - Before

and after school

programs that

contain physical


90-94% of the time

during the school

year.

Recognized -

Before and after

school programs

that contain physical


95-99% of the time

during the school

year.

Exemplary - Before

and after school

programs that

contain physical


100% of the time

during the school

year. N/A

Performance Measure

4. Before and after school programs are offered that contain physical activity. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - 89%

or less of students

are not removed

from PE for tutorial

sessions.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of students are

not removed from

PE for tutorial

sessions.

Recognized - 94-

99% of students are

not removed from

PE for tutorial

sessions.

Exemplary - 100%

of students are

never removed from

PE for tutorial

sessions. N/A

Performance Measure

5. Physical education students are not removed from class for tutorial sessions. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - 89

% or less of

students participate

in at least 20

minutes of

unstructured recess

in addition to 30

minutes daily

physical education

Acceptable - 90-

94% of students

participate in at

least 20 minutes of

unstructured recess

in addition to 30

minutes daily

physical education

Recognized - 95-

99% of students

participate in at

least 20 minutes of

unstructured recess

in addition to 30

minutes daily

physical education

Exemplary - 100%

of students

participate in at

least 20 minutes of

unstructured recess

in addition to 30

minutes daily

physical education N/A

Performance Measure

6. Students participate in at least 20 minutes of unstructured recess in addition to 30 minutes daily physical

education. (elementary schools only)

*

Unacceptable - 89%

or less of students

do not have

Physical education

activity and/or

recess withheld

from them as

punishment.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of students do

not have Physical

education activity

and/or recess

withheld from them

as punishment.

Recognized - 95-

99% of students do

not have Physical

education activity

and/or recess

withheld from them

as punishment.

Exemplary - 100%

of students do not

have Physical

education activity

and/or recess

withheld from them

as punishment. N/A

Performance Measure

7. Physical education activity and/or recess is not withheld from a student as punishment. (All levels)*

32

Unacceptable - 89%

and below of para-

professionals in

physical education

are certified

Acceptable - 90-

94% of para-

professionals in

physical education

are certified

Recognized - 95-

99% of para-

professionals in

physical education

are certified

Exemplary - 100%

of para-

professionals in

physical education

are certified N/A

Performance Measure

8. All para-professionals in physical education are certified. (elementary and middle schools only)*

Unacceptable - 89%

or less of all PE

classes are

monitored to

maintain the state

mandate of 45:1

adult-to-student

ratio.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of PE classes

are monitored to

maintain the state

mandate of 45:1

adult-to-student

ratio.

Recognized - 95-

99% of PE classes

are monitored to

maintain the state

mandate of 45:1

adult-to-student

ratio.

Exemplary - 100%

of PE classes are

monitored to

maintain the state

mandate of 45:1

adult-to-student

ratio. N/A

Performance Measure

9. PE classes are monitored to maintain the state mandate of 45:1 student-to-adult ratio. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - 89%

or less of Physical

education classes

offer safe and

enjoyable activities

for all students

including students

with special needs

Acceptable - 90-

94% of Physical

education classes

offer safe and


for all students

including students

with special needs

Recognized - 95-

99% of Physical

education classes

offer safe and


for all students

including students

with special needs

Exemplary - 100%

of Physical

education classes

offer safe and


for all students

including students

with special needs N/A

Performance Measure

10. Physical education classes offer safe and enjoyable activities for all students including students with

special needs. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable - 89%

or less of students

have fun in physical

education and

physical activities.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of students


education and


Recognized - 95-

99% of students


education and


Exemplary - 100%

of students have fun

in physical

education and

physical activities. N/A

Performance Measure

11. Students have fun in physical education and physical activities. (All levels)*

33

Unacceptable - 89%

or less of PE/Health

teachers attend

professional

development in

physical education

and/or health

education

Acceptable - 90-

94% of PE/Health

teachers attend

professional

development in

physical education

and/or health

education

Recognized - 95-

99% of PE/Health

teachers attend

professional

development in

physical education

and/or health

education

Exemplary - 100%

of PE/Health

teachers attend

professional

development in

physical education

and/or health

education N/A

Performance Measure

12. Teachers attend professional development in physical education and/or health education. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - 89%

or less of students

participate in

moderate to

vigorous physical

activity (MVPA) at

least 50% of class

time.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of students

participate in

moderate to

vigorous physical

activity (MVPA) at

least 50% of class

time.

Recognized - 95-

99% of students

participate in

moderate to

vigorous physical

activity (MVPA) at

least 50% of class

time.

Exemplary - 100%

of students

participate in

moderate to

vigorous physical

activity (MVPA) at

least 50% of class

time. N/A

Performance Measure

13. Students participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at least 50% of class time. (All

levels)

*

Unacceptable - 89%

or less of high

school students

complete 1

semester (0.5

credit) of Health

Education for

graduation.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of high school

students complete 1

semester (0.5

credit) of Health

Education for

graduation.

Recognized - 95-

99% of high school

students complete 1

semester (0.5

credit) of Health

Education for

graduation.

Exemplary - 100%

of high school

students complete 1

semester (0.5

credit) of Health

Education for

graduation. N/A

Performance Measure

14. High School students complete 1 semester (0.5 credit) of Health Education for graduation. (high

schools only)

*

Unacceptable - 89

% or less of

students complete

1.5 credits of

Physical Education

classes for

graduation.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of students

complete1.5 credits

of Physical

Education classes

for graduation.

Recognized - 95-

99% of students

complete1.5 credits

of Physical

Education classes

for graduation.

Exemplary - 100%

of students

complete 1.5 credits

of Physical

Education classes

for graduation. N/A

Performance Measure

15. High School students complete 1.5 credits of Physical Education classes for graduation. (high schools

only)

*

34

Unacceptable - 89%

or less of PE/Health

teachers utilizes a

sequential,

developmentally

appropriate Physical

Education

curriculum designed

to implement the

TEKS

Acceptable - 90-

94% of PE/Health

teachers utilizes a

sequential,

developmentally

appropriate Physical

Education

curriculum designed

to implement the

TEKS

Recognized - 95-

99% of PE/Health

teachers utilizes a

sequential,

developmentally

appropriate

Physical Education

curriculum designed

to implement the

TEKS

Exemplary - 100%

of PE/Health

teachers utilizes a

sequential,

developmentally

appropriate

Physical Education

curriculum designed

to implement the

TEKS N/A

Performance Measure

16. Campus utilizes a sequential, developmentally appropriate physical education curriculum designed to

implement the TEKS. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable - 0

Classroom

Presentations

Acceptable - 0-1

Classroom

Presentations

Recognized - 1-2

Classroom

Presentations

Exemplary - 2 or

More Classroom

Presentations N/A

Performance Measure

17. Healthy eating is promoted to students in a variety of ways in the campus environment. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - 0

Healthy options

offered

Acceptable - 1-2

Healthy options

offered

Recognized - 2-3

Healthy Options

offered

Exemplary - 3 or

More Healthy

Options offered N/A

Performance Measure

18. Concession stands at school related events outside the school day are encouraged to provide healthy

food options, offer plain water, and limit portion sizes to meet state and federal nutrition standards. (middle

schools and high schools only)

*

Unacceptable -

<75% notice given

to parents

Acceptable - 75-

84% notice given to

parents

Recognized - 85-

94% notice given to

parents

Exemplary - 95-

100% notice given

to parents N/A

Performance Measure

19. Notice given regarding needed immunizations. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

<75% notice given

to parents

Acceptable - 75-

84% notice given to

parents

Recognized - 85-

94% notice given to

parents

Exemplary - 95-

100% notice given

to parents N/A

Performance Measure

20. Participation in free vaccination clinics. (All levels)*

35

Unacceptable -

<75% compliance

rate

Acceptable - 75-

84% compliance

rate

Recognized - 85-

94% compliance

rate

Exemplary - 95-

100% compliance

rate N/A

Performance Measure

21. Campus immunization compliance rate. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - <2

clinics per feeder

pattern

Acceptable - 3

clinics per feeder

pattern

Recognized - 4

clinics per feeder

pattern

Exemplary - 5

clinics per feeder

pattern N/A

Performance Measure

22. Coordinating flu clinics for students, staff, parents of community. (All levels) *

Unacceptable -

Nurse participates in

1 safety committee

meeting per year

Acceptable - Nurse

participates in 2 or 3

safety committee

meetings per year

Recognized - Nurse

participates in 3 or 4

safety committee

meetings per year

Exemplary - Nurse

participates in all

safety committee

meetings

throughout the

school year N/A

Performance Measure

23. School nurse participates in Campus/District safety committees. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

<80% of school

employees on the

Emergency

Response Team are

CPR trained

Acceptable - 80-

90% of school

employees on the

Emergency

Response Team are

CPR trained

Recognized - 91-

95% of school

employees on the

Emergency

Response Team are

CPR trained

Exemplary - 96-

100% of school

employees on the

Emergency

Response Team are

CPR trained N/A

Performance Measure

24. School nurse coordination of CPR training for employees who are members of the campus Emergency

Response Team. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable - <80-

89% of our campus

students requiring

screenings are

screened

Acceptable - 90-

94% of our campus

students requiring

screenings are

screened

Recognized - 95-

97% of our campus

students requiring

screenings are

screened

Exemplary - 97-

100% of our

campus students

requiring screenings

are screened N/A

Performance Measure

25. Health screenings (hearing, vision, dental, spinal curvature, ancanthosis) (elementary and middle

schools only)

*

36

Unacceptable -

<85% of the time the

RN is available

during school hours

Acceptable - 85-

90% of the time the

RN is available

during school hours

Recognized - 91-

98% of the time the

RN is available

during school hours

Exemplary - 99-

100% of the time

the RN is available

during school hours N/A

Performance Measure

26. Availability of school nurses. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - <2

School Health

Wellness campus

events per year

Acceptable - 3

School Health

Wellness campus

events per year

Recognized - 4

School Health

Wellness campus

events per year

Exemplary - 5

School Health

Wellness campus

events per year N/A

Performance Measure

27. School nurse collaborates with PE coaches & Health teachers in the coordination of health/wellness

events (health fairs, Wellness Wednesdays, Fitness Fridays, Family Fun Fitness, Health education for

students, staff and parents etc.) and education on healthy topics: (nutrition, physical exercise, stress

reduction, etc..) (All levels)

*

37

Gifted and Talented


Unacceptable -

Less than 79% of

GT identified

students reflect total

campus populations

Acceptable - 80-

89% of GT identified


campus populations

Recognized - 90-



campus populations

Exemplary - 100%

of GT identified


campus populations N/A

Performance Measure

1. Identified GT students reflect total campus sub-groups/demographics. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

Less than 89% of

parents are

informed of GT

nomination

/selection

Acceptable - 90-

94% of parents are

informed of GT

nomination

/selection

Recognized - 95-

99% of parents are

informed of GT

nomination

/selection

Exemplary - 100%

of parents are

informed of GT

nomination

/selection N/A

Performance Measure

2. Parents are informed of process for nomination/selection of GT students and program services. (All

levels)

*

Unacceptable -

Less than 89% of

GT parents are

invited to

information /support

sessions throughout

the year, at least

twice at the campus

(fall/spring) and bi-

monthly whenever

possible at the

district level.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of GT parents

are invited to


sessions throughout

the year, at least

twice at the campus


monthly whenever

possible at the

district level.

Recognized - 95-

99% of GT parents

are invited to


sessions throughout

the year, at least

twice at the campus


monthly whenever

possible at the

district level.

Exemplary - 100%

of GT parents are

invited to


sessions throughout

the year, at least

twice at the campus


monthly whenever

possible at the

district level. N/A

Performance Measure

3. Parents of GT students are invited to district and campus information/support sessions throughout the

year, at least twice at the campus (fall/spring) and bi-monthly whenever possible at the district level. (All

levels)

*

38

Unacceptable -

Less than 89% of

parents of GT

students receive a

written plan on how

GT identified

students will be

provided services

throughout the year.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of parents of

GT students receive

a written plan on

how GT identified

students will be

provided services


Recognized - 95-

99% of parents of

GT students receive

a written plan on

how GT identified

students will be

provided services


Exemplary - 100%

of parents of GT

students receive a

written plan on how

GT identified

students will be

provided services

throughout the year. N/A

Performance Measure

4. Campus provide a written plan to parents on how GT identified students will be served throughout the

year. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable -

Less than 89% of

GT students are

provided the

opportunity to work

together as a group,

work with other

students and work

independently

during the school

day.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of GT students

are provided the

opportunity to work


work with other

students and work

independently

during the school

day.

Recognized - 95-

99% of GT students

are provided the

opportunity to work


work with other

students and work

independently

during the school

day.

Exemplary - 100%

of GT students are

provided the

opportunity to work


work with other

students and work

independently

during the school

day. N/A

Performance Measure

5. GT identified students are provided opportunities to work together as a group, work with other students,

and work independently during the school day. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable - Less than


students are provided

learning opportunities

which may include pull

out programs, GT

classes, and/or out of

school options. For

Secondary only: dual

credit, Pre-AP, AP, Pre-

IB, IB, out of school

options or GT classes.

Acceptable - 90-94% of

GT identified students are

provided learning

opportunities which may

include pull out programs,

GT classes, and/or out of

school options. For





Recognized - 95-99% of

GT identified students are

provided learning




school options. For





Exemplary - 100% of GT

identified students are

provided learning




school options. For





Performance Measure

6. Learning opportunities are provided for all GT identified students which may include pull out programs,

GT classes, and/or out of school options. For Secondary only: dual credit, Pre-AP, AP, Pre- IB, IB, out of

school options or GT classes. (All levels)

39

Unacceptable -

Less than 89% GT

identified students

are provided

opportunities to

participate in

competitions such

as Academic UIL,

Academic

Decathlon, History

Day, Team Quest,

Destination

Imagination and

other competitions

as well as field trips

throughout the

school year.

Acceptable - 90-

94% GT identified

students are

provided

opportunities to

participate in

competitions such

as Academic UIL,

Academic

Decathlon, History

Day, Team Quest,

Destination

Imagination and

other competitions


throughout the

school year.

Recognized - 95-

99% GT identified

students are

provided

opportunities to

participate in

competitions such

as Academic UIL,

Academic

Decathlon, History

Day, Team Quest,

Destination

Imagination and

other competitions


throughout the

school year.

Exemplary - 100%

GT identified

students are

provided

opportunities to

participate in

competitions such

as Academic UIL,

Academic

Decathlon, History

Day, Team Quest,

Destination

Imagination and

other competitions


throughout the

school year. N/A

Performance Measure

7. GT identified students are provided opportunities to participate in competitions such as Academic UIL,

Academic Decathlon, History Day, Team Quest, Destination Imagination and other competitions as well as

field trips throughout the school year. (All levels)

Unacceptable -

Less than 89% of

GT Identified


in Texas

Performance

Standards Projects

and/or other

approved projects.

Acceptable - 90-

94% of GT Identified


in Texas

Performance

Standards Projects

and/or other

approved projects.

Recognized - 95-

99% of GT

Identified students

participate in Texas

Performance

Standards Projects

and/or other

approved projects.

Exemplary - 100%

of GT Identified


in Texas

Performance

Standards Projects

and/or other

approved projects. N/A

Performance Measure

8. GT Identified students participate in Texas Performance Standards Projects and/or other approved

projects. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable -

Less than 79

%Teachers who

provide services for

GT students have

received 30 hours of

professional

development in

Gifted and Talented

Education within the

1st semester.

Acceptable - 80-89

%Teachers who


GT students have

received 30 hours of

professional

development in

Gifted and Talented


1st semester.

Recognized - 90-99

%Teachers who


GT students have

received 30 hours

of professional

development in

Gifted and Talented


1st semester.

Exemplary - 100

%Teachers who


GT students have

received 30 hours

of professional

development in

Gifted and Talented


1st semester. N/A

Performance Measure

9. Teachers who provide services for GT students have received 30 hours of professional development in

Gifted and Talented Education within the 1st semester. (All levels)

*

40

Dropout Prevention


Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

students feel safe at

school

Acceptable - 71-

80% of students feel

safe at school

Recognized - 81-

89% of students feel

safe at school

Exemplary - 90-

100% of students

feel safe at school N/A

Performance Measure

1. Provide students with safe learning environment. (All levels) *

Unacceptable - 84%

and below of

students who

receive notice for

tutoring services

attend.

Acceptable - 85-

89% of students

who receive notice

for tutoring services

attend.

Recognized - 90-

96% of students

who receive notice


attend.

Exemplary - 97-

100% of students

who receive notice


attend. N/A

Performance Measure

2. Campus provides tutorial services for students whose grade in a subject for a reporting period is lower

than the equivalent of 70 on a scale of 100 to attend tutorials. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable - No

partnerships exist

with all local

colleges and

universities in the El

Paso Area

Acceptable -

Proposals are in

progress to create

partnerships with all

local colleges and


Paso Area

Recognized - Few

partnerships exist

with all local

colleges and


Paso Area

Exemplary -

Partnerships exist

with all local

colleges and


Paso Area N/A

Performance Measure

3. Community collaboration exist through partnerships with colleges and universities in the El Paso area.

(All levels)

*

Unacceptable -

Campus does not

offer the CHAMPS

Mentoring Program

Acceptable -

Campus has 0-5

mentees

Recognized -

Campus has 5- 20

mentees

Exemplary -

Campus has 20-50

mentees N/A

Performance Measure

4. Number of students participating in the CHAMPS Mentoring Program. (All levels)*

41

Unacceptable - 84%

and below of

students who

receive notice for

tutoring services

attend.

Acceptable - 85-

89% of students

who receive notice


attend.

Recognized - 90-

96% of students

who receive notice


attend.

Exemplary - 97-

100% of students

who receive notice


attend. N/A

Performance Measure

5. Campus provides intensive after-school opportunities (including mornings and Saturdays) in the areas of

Math and Science. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

students completed

SMART goals

Acceptable - 70-

80% of students

completed SMART

goals

Recognized - 81-

99% of students

completed SMART

goals

Exemplary - 100%

of students set

SMART goals N/A

Performance Measure

6. Student Goal Setting. (All levels)*

Unacceptable - 69%

and below of

documentation and

implementation in

place

Acceptable - 70-79

% of documentation

and implementation

in place

Recognized - 80-89

%of documentation

and implementation

in place

Exemplary - 90-

100% of

documentation and

implementation in

place N/A

Performance Measure

7. RTI, SSI and 504 plans. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

Attendance rate at

94% or lower

Acceptable -

Attendance rate at

95-96%

Recognized -

Attendance rate at

96.1-96.9%

Exemplary -

Attendance rate at

97% or higher N/A

Performance Measure

8. Campus attendance rate. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

Generation Texas

Week not

implemented.

Acceptable -

Generation Texas

Week implemented

with less than two of

the items.

Recognized -

Generation Texas

Week implemented

with two of the

items.

Exemplary -

Generation Texas

Week implemented

with more than two

of the items. N/A

Performance Measure

9. Campus will implement Generation Texas Week to include at least two of the following: guest speakers,

presentations and display of diplomas, regalia, colleges and universities. (All levels)

*

42

Unacceptable -

SCCC: HS - 0% MS

- 0% and EL 0% of

time allotted.

Acceptable - SCCC:

HS 1-9%; MS 1-

19%; EL 1-29%

Recognized - SSCC

- HS 10-14%; MS

20-24%; EL 30-44%

of allotted time.

Exemplary - School

Counseling Core

Curriculum (SCCC)

lessons were

presented High

School - 15-25% of

the total time

allotted; Middle

School - 25-35% of

total time allotted;

and Elementary -

35-45% of total time

allotted (time

allotted = 6 hrs. per

day x 5 days per

week x 36 weeks

per year=1,080

hours per year) N/A

Performance Measure

10. Campus will implement School Counseling Core Curriculum lessons (lessons in the classroom for all

students) in the classroom based on academic, personal, social and career areas. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable -

Career day was not

implemented.

Acceptable - Career

day was

implemented with 1-

3 endorsements

represented.

Recognized -

Career day was

implemented with at

least 4 of the

endorsements

represented.

Exemplary - Career

day was

implemented and

there were

presentations,

speakers, etc.

based on all five

endorsements. N/A

Performance Measure

11. Campus will implement Career Day based on the five endorsements. (elementary and middle schools

only)

*

Unacceptable - 0-

69% of referrals

have been through

the RTI process

Acceptable - 70-

89% of referrals

have been through

the RTI process

Recognized - 90-

94% of referrals

have been through

the RTI process

Exemplary - 95-

100% of referrals

have been through

the RTI process N/A

Performance Measure

12. Percent of referrals to Special Education which have gone through a robust RTI process. (All levels)*

43

Unacceptable -

Special Ed./General

Ed. co-teachers only

utilize the one

teach, one assist

model of co-

teaching

Acceptable -

Special Ed./General

Ed. co-teachers only

utilize the team

teaching model of

co-teaching

Recognized -

Special Ed./General

Ed. co-teachers

mostly utilize at

least 3-4 co-teach

situations.

Exemplary - Special

Ed/General Ed. Co-

teachers mostly

utilize parallel,

station, alternative,

and team teaching

within co-teach

settings and avoid

using 1 teach, 1

assist and 1 teach,

1 observe. N/A

Performance Measure

13. Utilizing the 5 different co-teaching models. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

Tutoring is not

offered at the

campus

Acceptable - 1-2


to SPED students

on campus

Recognized - 3-4


to SPED students

on campus

Exemplary - SPED

students are

routinely included in

at least 5 tutoring

opportunities N/A

Performance Measure

14. Tutoring opportunities for SPED students. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

students receive

accelerated

instruction

Acceptable - 71-

80% of students

receive accelerated

instruction

Recognized - 81-

90% of students

receive accelerated

instruction

Exemplary - 91-

100% of students

receive accelerated

instruction N/A

Performance Measure

15. Provide students who have not performed satisfactorily on STAAR or end-of-course (EOC) assessment

with accelerated instruction. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable - 59%

or less of students

have completed the

FAFSA application

process

Acceptable - 60-

69% of students

have completed the

FAFSA application

process

Recognized - 70-

79% of students

have completed the

FAFSA application

process

Exemplary - 80% or

more of students

have completed the

FAFSA application

process N/A

Performance Measure

16. Number of high school seniors completing their FAFSA application. (high schools only)*

Unacceptable -

Less than 90% of

students have

completed the Apply

Texas application

Acceptable - 90-

94% of students

have completed the

Apply Texas

application

Recognized - 95-

99% of students

have completed the

Apply Texas

application

Exemplary - 100%

of students have

completed the Apply

Texas application N/A

Performance Measure

17. Number of high school seniors completing their Apply Texas application. (high schools only)*

44

Unacceptable -

FLS/PAS students

participate in CBI

activities less than 5

times per year.

Acceptable -

FLS/PAS students

participate in CBI

activities at least 6-8

times per year.

Recognized -

FLS/PAS students

participate in CBI

activities at least 9-

11 times per year.

Exemplary -

FLS/PAS students

participate in CBI

activities more than

12 times per year. N/A

Performance Measure

18. Participation by FLS/PAS students in Community Based Instruction. (middle schools and high schools

only)

*

Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

annual IEP goals

and objectives are

updated.

Acceptable - 70-

90% of annual IEP

goals and objectives

are updated

Recognized - 90-

95% of annual IEP

goals and

objectives are

updated

Exemplary - 95%-

100% of annual IEP

goals and

objectives are

updated N/A

Performance Measure

19. Annual IEP goals and objectives are updated every nine weeks and provided to the parent and/or adult

student. (All levels)

*

Unacceptable -

SPED students

receiving

modified/alternative

instruction (who are

not already

participating in CTE

programs)

participate in CTED

programs aligned to

post-secondary

employment goals

at a rate of less than

70%.

Acceptable - SPED

students receiving



not already


programs)

participate in CTED

programs aligned to

post-secondary

employment goals

at a rate of 70%-

90%

Recognized - SPED

students receiving



not already


programs)

participate in CTED

programs aligned to

post-secondary

employment goals

at a rate of 90%-

95%

Exemplary - SPED

students receiving



not already


programs)

participate in CTED

programs aligned to

post-secondary

employment goals

at a rate of 95% to

100% N/A

Performance Measure

20. CTED Program participation by SPED students receiving modified/alternative instruction. (high schools

only)

*

45

Digital Learning


Unacceptable -

Campus average for

Teaching and

Learning on the

Texas STaR Chart is

at Early Tech Level.

Acceptable -

Campus average for

Teaching and

Learning on the

Texas STaR Chart is

at Developing Tech

Level.

Recognized -

Campus average for

Teaching and

Learning on the

Texas STaR Chart

is at Advanced Tech

Level.

Exemplary -

Campus average for

Teaching and

Learning on the

Texas STaR Chart

is at Target Tech

Level. N/A

Performance Measure

1. Teaching and Learning. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

Campus average for

Educator

Preparation and

Development on the

Texas STaR Chart is


Acceptable -

Campus average for

Educator

Preparation and

Development on the

Texas STaR Chart is

at Developing Tech

Level.

Recognized -

Campus average for

Educator

Preparation and

Development on the

Texas STaR Chart

is at Advanced Tech

Level.

Exemplary -

Campus average for

Educator

Preparation and

Development on the

Texas STaR Chart

is at Target Tech

Level. N/A

Performance Measure

2. Educator Preparation and Development. (All levels) *

46

Unacceptable -

Campus average for

Infrastructure for

Technology on the

Texas STaR Chart is


Acceptable -

Campus average for

Infrastructure for

Technology on the

Texas STaR Chart is

at Developing Tech

Level.

Recognized -

Campus average for

Infrastructure for

Technology on the

Texas STaR Chart

is at Advanced Tech

Level.

Exemplary -

Campus average for

Infrastructure for

Technology on the

Texas STaR Chart

is at Target Tech

Level. N/A

Performance Measure

3. Leadership, Administration, & Instructional Support. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

Campus average for

Infrastructure for

Technology on the

Texas STaR Chart is


Acceptable -

Campus average for

Infrastructure for

Technology on the

Texas STaR Chart is

at Developing Tech

Level.

Recognized -

Campus average for

Infrastructure for

Technology on the

Texas STaR Chart

is at Advanced Tech

Level.

Exemplary -

Campus average for

Infrastructure for

Technology on the

Texas STaR Chart

is at Target Tech

Level. N/A

Performance Measure

4. Infrastructure for Technology. (All levels)*

Unacceptable -

Less than 80% of

students

successfully

completing courses

for original credit in

a digital

environment.

Acceptable - 80% -

89% of students

successfully

completing courses


a digital

environment.

Recognized - 90% -

94% of students

successfully

completing courses


a digital

environment.

Exemplary - More

than 95% of

students

successfully

completing courses


a digital

environment. N/A

Performance Measure

5. Digital/Distance Learning. (high schools utilizing Compass Learning for credit recovery only)*

Unacceptable -

Less than 70% of

students meet or

exceed the

Proficient Level of

the Technology

Applications

Assessment.

Acceptable - 70% -

80% of students

meet or exceed the

Proficient Level of

the Technology

Applications

Assessment.

Recognized - 81% -

90% of students

meet or exceed the

Proficient Level of

the Technology

Applications

Assessment.

Exemplary - More

than 90% of

students meet or

exceed the

Proficient Level of

the Technology

Applications

Assessment. N/A

Performance Measure

6. Student Technology Competencies. (middle schools only)*

47

Compliance


1. The Campus Improvement Plan has a complete Comprehensive Needs Assessment (CNA) in narrative

format that includes an Introduction, a Summary, and clearly identifies and explains the campus' strengths

and improvement needs for each long range goal. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

2. The Campus Improvement Plan contains objectives for each long range goal that are specific,

measurable, attainable, result-oriented, and time-based. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

3. All 10 Components of a Title I School-wide Program, as per No Child Left Behind, are addressed within

the framework of the Campus Improvement Plan (Pre-K/K Transition applies only to schools with Pre-K and

Kinder students). (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

4. Within each strategy in the Campus Improvement Plan, only titles (no names) of individuals are listed in

the "Persons Responsible" column. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

48

5. Within each strategy in the Campus Improvement Plan, one or more time descriptions that signify when

a strategy will occur have been identified (daily, weekly, monthly, etc.) (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

6. Within each strategy in the Campus Improvement Plan, a funding source (Title I, State Compensatory

Education, Title III, etc.) and an estimated dollar amount of what has been/will be spent on the strategy

have been designated. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

7. Within the Campus Improvement Plan, strategies appear that describe the roles of campus personnel

that are paid with state and/or federal funds (Title I, State Compensatory Education, Title III, etc.). These

strategies clearly identify a funding source, FTE numbers, and dollar amounts. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

8. The Campus Improvement Plan includes Comprehensive Needs Assessment narrative information,

objectives, and strategies that explain the measures that the campus will take to ensure students safety.

(All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A


objectives, and strategies that explain the measures that the campus will take to improve student

performance. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

49


objectives, and strategies that explain the measures that the campus will take to provide professional

development to faculty and staff. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A


objectives, and strategies that explain the measures that the campus will take to improve parent and

community involvement in the education of students. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A


objectives, and strategies that explain the measures that the campus will take to enhance faculty and staff

accountability with regard to student performance. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

13. Distribution of Agricultural Survey is given to parents yearly. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

14. Students and parents notified of STAAR results within 10 days of receipt. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

50

15. Health screenings are made available on campus (hearing, vision, dental, spinal curvature) (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

16. Home language surveys are collected for every student. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

17. Immediate enrollment of students in homeless situations occurs, even if they do not have required

documents, such as school records, medical records, proof of residence, or other documents (Note:the

term "enroll" is defined as attending classes and participating fully in school activities). (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

18. The campus conducted an annual evaluation of Campus Parental Involvement Policy with the

involvement of parents. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

19. TEA-prepared School Report Cards are made available for parents to access. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

20. A disciplinary alternative education program or DAEP (KEYS Academy) shall be supported by the

district. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

51

21. A TEA approved Coordinated School Health program is implemented in all grade levels. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

22. Faculty and staff is highly qualified. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

23. Social Work Program offered through Communities in Schools (CIS). (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

24. Notices of required notice/postings to website are carried out in a timely manner. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

25. Teachers who provide instruction to Gifted and Talented students have received 30 hours of

professional development in Gifted and Talented education. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

26. Teachers who have received 30 hours of professional development in Gifted and Talented education

and who provide instruction to Gifted and Talented students receive 6 hours annually of professional

development related to Gifted and Talented Education. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

52

27. Campus host yearly showcases to demonstrate projects and performances completed by GT Students

throughout the year. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

28. Board approved policies are followed to support GT programs and students. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

29. Administrators and Counselors who have authority over service decisions for Gifted and Talented

Students are required a minimum of 6 hours of professional development in the area of Nature and Needs

of GT students. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

30. Annual IEP goals and objectives are updated every nine weeks and provided to the parent and/or adult

student. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

31. Professional development opportunities were provided to teachers in the areas of sheltered instruction

and ELPS. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

53

32. Pre-K and Kinder ESL teachers received training for ESL academies focused on English acquisition.

(Elementary only)

*

Yes

No

N/A

33. Based on the last two years of data, did the percent of students reaching Advanced High on TELPAS

composite score increase? (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

34. Online courses for high school credit recovery are offered through (Compass Learning) (middle schools

and high schools only)

*

Yes

No

N/A

35. Campus provides instructional support for ELL students to address the PBMAS accountability system.

(All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

36. School Improvement Audits are made available to parents. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

37. Adhere to compliance with State required safety plans. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

54

38. Reporting compliance related to NCLB, FIRST Rating, PBMAS, PEIMS, transportation is carried out in

a timely manner. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

39. Staff evaluations are completed by district or campus deadline. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

40. Number of State Testing irregularities are reported immediately to district testing coordinators and are

reported to TEA in a timely manner. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

41. All physical education teachers are certified in physical education. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

42. Elementary school students are provided TEKS based health education instruction. (elementary schools

only)

*

Yes

No

N/A

43. High school students are taught P.A.P.A. (Parenting and Paternity Awareness) (high schools only) *

Yes

No

N/A

55

44. Students participate in at least 30 minutes per day of TEKS based physical education. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

45. The student to teacher ratio in each class is no more than 45:1 OR if higher, a safety plan is provided.

(All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

46. Students participate in 30 minutes per day or 135 minutes per week of physical education or structured

moderate to vigorous physical activity for four semesters out of six semesters in grades 6-7-8. (middle

schools only)

*

Yes

No

N/A

47. High school students participating in an approved substitution activity for PE credit participate in at least

100 minutes per 5-day school week at a moderate to vigorous physical activity level (state approved

substitutions: athletics, marching band, cheerleading, drill team, JROTC, approved off-campus physical

activity) (high schools only)

*

Yes

No

N/A

48. Fitness assessment using FITNESSGRAM is conducted at least once per school year for students in

grades 3-12 receiving credit for physical education. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

56

49. Fitness assessment scores are shared with parents upon request. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

50. Fitness assessment student scores are reported to TEA on time. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

51. Teachers are certified in AED, CPR, and First Aid. (All levels) *

Yes

No

N/A

52. A TEA approved Coordinate School Health program is implemented in all K-8 schools. (elementary and

middle schools only)

*

Yes

No

N/A

53. Adhere to Federal and State guidelines for food served in school environment: vending machines,

concessions, in the classroom etc. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

54. Compliance with age-appropriate guidelines and recommendations for healthy food and beverage

choices during the regular and extended day. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

57

55. Elementary school - competitive foods are not allowed during schools hours. (elementary schools only) *

Yes

No

N/A

56. Compliance with USDA nutrition requirements for National School Breakfast and National School Lunch

Program. (All levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

57. Concession stands at school related events outside the school day are encouraged to provide healthy

food options, offer plain water, and limit portion sizes to meet state and federal nutrition standards. (All

levels)

*

Yes

No

N/A

58

21st Century Workforce


Unacceptable - 0 -

25% of CTE

graduates received

certification or

license or on

pathway to obtain.

Acceptable - 25% to

50% of CTE

graduates received

certification or

license or on

pathway to obtain.

Recognized - 50%

to 75% of CTE

graduates received

certifications or

licenses or on

pathway to obtain.

Exemplary - 75% or

higher - CTE

graduates received

certifications or

licenses or on

pathway to obtain. N/A

Performance Measure

1. Percent of students completing CTE programs that lead to recognized certifications or licenses. (high

schools only)

*

Unacceptable - 10%

of CTE courses are

offered as

articulated or dual

credit.

Acceptable - 20% of

CTE courses are

offered as

articulated or dual

credit

Recognized - 30%

of CTE courses are

offered as

articulated or dual

credit

Exemplary - 40% of

CTE courses are

offered as

articulated or dual

credit N/A

Performance Measure

2. Percent of workforce articulated courses offered for students. (high schools only)*

Unacceptable - 2% Acceptable - 5% Recognized - 7.50% Exemplary - 10% N/A

Performance Measure

3. Percent of workforce dual credit courses offered for students. (high schools only)*

Unacceptable - 0-

20% of exiting 12th

graders currently

enrolled in a CTE

workforce course

Acceptable - 21%-

49% of exiting 12th

grades currently

enrolled in a CTE

workforce course

Recognized - 50% -

69% of exiting 12th

grades currently

enrolled in a CTE

workforce course

Exemplary - 70% or

high of exiting 12th

graders currently

enrolled in a CTE

workforce course N/A

Performance Measure

4. Percent of students completing coherent sequence of CTE courses. (high schools only)*

59

Unacceptable - Zero

to 10% of exiting 8th

graders have

participated in 1 or

more Career

Assessment.

Acceptable - 11 %

to 30% of exiting 8th

graders have


more Career

Assessments.

Recognized - 31% -

50: of exiting 8th

graders have


more Career

Assessments.

Exemplary - 51% or

high exiting 8th

graders have


more Career

Assessments. N/A

Performance Measure

5. Percent of students participating in career assessments. (i.e. Career Cruising & College to Careers)

(middle schools only)

*

Unacceptable - 0

opportunities

provided annually

Acceptable - 1-2

opportunities

provided annually

Recognized - 3-5

opportunities

provided annually

Exemplary - 6 or

more opportunities

provided annually N/A

Performance Measure

6. Number of student- centered college and career readiness enrichment opportunities (i.e. Guest

Speakers, College Visits, Career Days/ Fairs, Science Fairs) (All levels)

*

Unacceptable - 0-

20% are actively

involved in a CTE

Organization

Acceptable - 21-

40% are actively

involved in a CTE

Organization

Recognized - 40-50

% are actively

involved in a CTE

Organization

Exemplary - > 50%

are actively involved

in a CTE

Organization N/A

Performance Measure

7. Percent of CTE students affiliated with Career and Technical Student Organizations. (middle schools and

high schools only)

*

Unacceptable - 2% Acceptable - 3% Recognized - 4% Exemplary - 5% N/A

Performance Measure

8. Percentage of CTE students participating in National Technical Honor Society. (high schools only)*

Unacceptable - 0-

35% visited a

college or technical

school

Acceptable - 36-

55%

Recognized - 56-

75%

Exemplary - 75 -

100% N/A

Performance Measure

9. Percentage of CTE Seniors completed college or technical school visit (Through CTE). (high schools

only)

*

60

Unacceptable -

Attends an average

of 1 staff

developments per

year

Acceptable -

Attends an average

of 2 staff

developments per

year

Recognized -

Attends an average

of 3 staff

developments per

year

Exemplary - Attends

an average of 4 or

more staff

developments per

year N/A

Performance Measure

10. CTE Teacher attends Staff Development Opportunities to improve instruction, college preparedness or

industry preparedness. (middle schools and high schools only)

*

Unacceptable -

Average of 1

Industry License or

Certification Per

Teacher

Acceptable -

Average of 2

Industry License or

Certification Per

Teacher

Recognized -

Average of 3

Industry License or

Certification Per

Teacher

Exemplary -

Average of 4

Industry License or

Certification Per

Teacher N/A

Performance Measure

11. CTE Teacher obtains or maintains Industry licenses or certifications. (middle schools and high schools

only)

*

Unacceptable -

Average Daily

Attendance of <90%

Acceptable -

Average Daily

Attendance of 90-

94%

Recognized -

Average Daily

Attendance of 95-

97%

Exemplary -

Average Daily

Attendance of 98%-

100% N/A

Performance Measure

12. CTE maintains Student Daily Attendance. (middle schools and high schools only)*

Unacceptable - <2

biyearly meeting per

program

Acceptable - 2

biyearly meetings

per program

Recognized - >2

biyearly meetings

per program

Exemplary -

monthly meetings

per program N/A

Performance Measure

13. Organizes and attends business and industry partner meetings. (middle schools and high schools only)*

Unacceptable - 0-1

Partner per program

Acceptable - 2-3

Partners per

program

Recognized - 4-5

Partners per

program

Exemplary - 6 or

more partners per

program N/A

Performance Measure

14. Develops business and industry partners. (middle schools and high schools only)*

Unacceptable - 0

per program

Acceptable - 1 per

program

Recognized - 2-3

per program

Exemplary - 4 or

more per program N/A

Performance Measure

15. Organizes community service activities. (middle schools and high schools only)*

Texas Honor BoardRegion 19 Board of the Year

Gary Gandara - PresidentPaul Guerra - Vice President

Cynthia A. Najera - SecretaryHector F. Gonzalez - TrusteeMichael A. Najera - Trustee

Antonio ‘Tony’ Ayub - TrusteeAngelica Rodriguez - Trustee

Region 19 Superintendent of the YearJosé Espinoza, Ed.D.

The Socorro Independent School District does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, disability, or age in its programs, activities or employment.

Socorro ISD District Service Center12440 Rojas Dr. • El Paso, TX 79928 • Phn 915.937.0000 • www.sisd.net

Community Engagement Survey...Highly Qualified, Effective Faculty and Staff Direction Four Home,...

Documents

Transcript of Community Engagement Survey...Highly Qualified, Effective Faculty and Staff Direction Four Home,...