HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT

COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT 2015 UPDATE

CITY OF PHOENIX HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2015 COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT

PREPARED BY:

BURNS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3030 NORTH THIRD STREET

SUITE 200 PHOENIX, AZ 85012

WWW.BURNSHEALTHPOLICY.COM

JANUARY 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 1 Purpose and Background The City of Phoenix’s Human Services Department (HSD) delivers a variety of social services to City residents, ranging from Early Head Start and Head Start programs to senior centers, from rental and utility assistance for families in crisis to shelter services for those experiencing homelessness, from assistance for victims of crime to tax filing assistance. Some of these programs are funded, in part, by federal funds, including Head Start grant dollars and the Community Services Block Grant (CSBG). Both of these grants require grantees to conduct periodic community assessments. Federal Head Start regulations mandate each Early Head Start and Head Start grantee to conduct a Community Assessment within its service area once every three years that includes:

(1) The demographic make-up of Head Start eligible children and families, including their estimated number, geographic location, and racial and ethnic composition;

(2) Other child development and child care programs that are serving Head Start eligible children, including publicly funded State and local preschool programs, and the approximate number of Head Start eligible children served by each;

(3) The estimated number of children with disabilities four years old or younger, including types of disabilities and relevant services and resources provided to these children by community agencies;

(4) Data regarding the education, health, nutrition and social service needs of Head Start eligible children and their families;

(5) The education, health, nutrition and social service needs of Head Start eligible children and their families as defined by families of Head Start eligible children and by institutions in the community that serve young children;

(6) Resources in the community that could be used to address the needs of Head Start eligible children and their families, including assessments of their availability and accessibility.1

The regulations further state:

In each of the two years following completion of the Community Assessment the grantee must conduct a review to determine whether there have been significant changes in the information described in paragraph (b) of this section2 [relating to requirements that service areas be of “reasonable size” and not overlap other Head Start grantees].

CSBG requirements are less prescriptive, requiring (emphasis added):

an assurance that the State will secure from each eligible entity in the State, as a condition to receipt of funding by the entity through a community services block

1 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 1305.3(c) 2 45 Code of Federal Regulations § 1305.3(e)

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 2

grant made under this chapter for a program, a community action plan (which shall be submitted to the Secretary, at the request of the Secretary, with the State plan) that includes a community-needs assessment for the community served, which may be coordinated with community-needs assessments conducted for other programs;3

In conformance with these requirements, HSD conducted a complete community assessment in late 2012, culminating in a January 2013 report. As an interim assessment, this report:

• Briefly reviews the 2013 Community Assessment,

• Updates Census figures and economic data, and

• Discusses changes to programs that benefit low-income populations. Overview of 2012/2013 Community Assessment The 2012/2013 Community Assessment included a general overview of the City, with sections devoted to the demographics of the City’s residents, education, employment, housing, crime, and community amenities; outlined services available to low-income and other in-need residents from City, State, and federal sources; and summarized findings from surveys of HSD clients and partners. The residents of the City of Phoenix are demographically diverse. Demographic highlights from the 2012/2013 assessment included:

• The City’s population grew 9.4 percent between the 2000 and 2010 Censuses, the second-highest growth rate among the ten most populous cities in the country

• The median age of Phoenicians was 31.6 years, compared to a statewide median of 35.5 years (which, in turn, is the seventh-lowest median in the country)

• Less than half of the City’s population was White/Caucasian while about 40 percent of its residents were of Hispanic descent; between the 2000 and 2010 censuses, the Hispanic population grew 31 percent while the White population increased only 1 percent

• One third of Phoenix households spoke a language other than English at home sometimes or always

• The City’s median household income was $48,823 annually, 3.3 percent less than the statewide median; additionally, the City’s 19.1 percent poverty rate was significantly greater than the 15.3 percent statewide rate

Highlights from the health section included:

• More than 1.2 million Arizonans, almost one-in-five residents, do not have health insurance

3 42 United States Code § 9908(b)(11)

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 3

• The number of births in Phoenix declined 15 percent between 2008 and 2010; of the 2010 births, 53 percent were to unwed mothers and two-thirds were paid by a public payer (generally the State’s Medicaid program)

• Arizona Health Survey data showed both strengths and weaknesses in the health of Phoenix residents while often illustrating disparities across income and racial/ethnic lines

The overview of the education section of the assessment noted the following:

• Phoenix students face a number of challenges, with 48.3 percent qualifying for free or reduced lunch, 10.7 percent being English language learners, and 9.2 percent receiving special education services

• Across Arizona, State funding for K-12 education was cut by $1.0 billion, or 19.5 percent, between fiscal years 2008 and 2013

• One-half of schools in Phoenix received an ‘A’ or ‘B’ from the Arizona Department of Education and one-half received a ‘C’ or ‘D’

• The combined five-year graduation rate for Phoenix high schools was 79.0 percent, with lower rates for minority students, those from economically disadvantaged homes, and those with disabilities

The Great Recession had a profound impact on the City’s economy. The assessment’s review of the City’s economic environment found:

• Between September 2007 and September 2012, the greater Phoenix area lost 8.1 percent of its jobs – representing approximately 156,000 jobs – including a 47.2 percent reduction in construction jobs

• The Phoenix area’s unemployment insurance rate increased from about four percent to more than 12 percent between January 2008 and January 2010, before declining to 7.1 percent in September 2012

• Forecasters expected the Phoenix area to add 400,000 jobs over the next decade, but most of these jobs are anticipated to be lower-wage; 71 percent of the new jobs will require no more than a high school education

• The largest industry in terms of employment was trade, transportation, and utilities, the largest sector of which is retail jobs

• Medium- and large-size employers are responsible for most Phoenix jobs; firms with at least 25 employees account for 75 percent of all jobs

The City’s housing market similarly suffered during the recession, notably:

• The number of foreclosures in Phoenix increased 373 percent between 2007 and 2011

• The median home price of a resale (i.e., not new) home in Phoenix declined from $220,000 to $85,000 between 2007 and 2011

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 4

• The cost of rental housing rose significantly; for example, between 2007 and 2011 the average monthly cost of a two-bedroom home in the greater Phoenix area increased 19.7 percent from $782 to $936

The assessment also briefly reviewed crime statistics, finding:

• Following national trends, Phoenix experienced a decrease in crime in recent years, with violent crimes falling 25.3 percent and property crimes declining 33.8 percent between 2000 and 2011

• Crime in Phoenix is more prevalent than in the State as a whole, which is common in large, urban cities

• Crime rates are significantly higher in the southern and central parts of the City The Community Assessment considered the services available for low-income and other populations served by HSD. In general, the assessment demonstrated that the demand for services increased significantly as a result of the recession as evidenced by the increase in enrollment in entitlement-type services such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, formerly food stamps), Social Security, and Medicaid. However, the recession also reduced government revenues, resulting in restrictions in non-entitlement programs, including program eliminations, eligibility limitations, increased copayments, and waiting lists. Trends in select State- and federally-administered programs included:

• Eligibility for the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS, the State’s Medicaid program) was limited by freezing coverage for childless adults as well as KidsCare for children up to 200 percent of the federal poverty level. The number of Maricopa County residents enrolled in AHCCCS grew 32 percent between 2008 and 2011, but then declined six percent due primarily to reductions in childless adults. KidsCare enrollment fell 76 percent between 2008 and 2011 before roughly doubling between 2011 and 2012 as the more limited KidsCare II program was implemented.

• The number of Social Security recipients in Phoenix increased 16.1 percent, to 164,786, between December 2007 and December 2011.

• The number of Phoenix families receiving cash assistance declined by more than one-half between July 2008 and July 2012 as a result of stricter lifetime benefit limits enacted by the State Legislature in 2010 and 2011.

• Statewide enrollment in the State’s child care program, operated by the Arizona Department of Economic Security, decreased 43.5 percent between July 2008 and July 2012 after a waiting list was implemented due to funding shortfalls.

• Phoenix households receiving SNAP benefits increased 78 percent between July 2008 and July 2012, when more than one-in-four Phoenix households received assistance.

The Community Assessment also included a survey of HSD clients and partners. In total, 1,950 clients and 84 partners responded to the survey. Highlights included:

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 5

• The most commonly mentioned neighborhood strengths included good schools, affordable housing, and city services

• When asked about the most significant challenges faced by their neighborhoods, common responses were a lack of good jobs, a lack of afterschool activities, and drug use

• Respondents consistently stated they were highly satisfied with HSD services, including Early Head Start and Head Start, family services centers, and senior centers

• The most commonly reported unmet need was dental care Part I: Updated Data As part of this interim assessment, the City identified updated data in three key areas: demographics based on newer Census data, employment, and the housing market. Census Information regarding Phoenix’s approximately 1.5 million residents and more than half-million households has been adapted from the United States Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS). In the three years of available data since the 2010 census, the City has experienced moderate population growth ranging between 1.3 and 1.7 percent, outpacing the State’s annual 1.1 percent growth rate. Figure 1 illustrates these trends. In total, Phoenix gained an estimated 64,000 residents between 2010 and 2013. Population growth was greatest among the older age groups. The number of residents between 55 and 64 years of age increased 11 percent while the 65 to 74 year-old cohort grew more than 16 percent. In contrast, the number of children was essentially unchanged during this period, increasing less than one-half of one percent. These patterns are consistent with statewide trends. Growth rates for the two largest racial/ethnic groups in the City moved in opposite directions. The number of individuals of Hispanic descent increased 8.1 percent since the 2010 Census. In contrast, the City’s largest racial/ethnic group – individuals of Caucasian/White descent – declined 1.2 percent. This trend is likely to continue given the age profiles of these groups. Almost two-thirds of the Hispanic population is under 35 years of age while 46 percent of the White population is over 45 years-old.

January 21, 2015

0.00%0.25%0.50%0.75%1.00%1.25%1.50%1.75%2.00%

2011 2012 2013

Fig. 1: Population Growth Rate, 2011-2013

Phoenix Arizona

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 6 Many of the Human Services Department’s services assist low-income individuals and families. More than 350,000 Phoenix residents live in households with incomes below the federal poverty level, which in 2014 was $19,790 for a family of three.4 The City’s poverty rate in 2013 was 23.6 percent, meaning nearly one-in-four residents live in poverty. The City’s poverty rate has increased significantly since 2005, when it was 16.4 percent. However, 2013 was the first year within this time period during which the poverty rate declined. Phoenix’s poverty rate is substantially greater than the 18.6 percent statewide poverty rate, which is common among the country’s large, urban cities. Across the other 10 most populous cities in the nation, however, Phoenix’s poverty rate was the third highest, lower than only Philadelphia and Dallas. Further, among these cities, Phoenix experienced the largest growth in its poverty rate between 2005 and 2013. The incidence of poverty is correlated with a number of demographics; for instance:

• Children are most likely to live in poverty, with more than one in three children under five years of age living in households with incomes below the poverty level, a rate more than three times greater than for individuals over 65 years of age. Within HSD’s Head Start service area, there are more than 12,000 three and four year-olds living in poverty and there are more than 14,000 children from birth through two years of age within the City’s Early Head Start service area.

• Households led by unmarried women are substantially more likely to be in poverty than any other household type.

• Poverty is highly correlated with education; more than 36 percent of individuals who have not completed high school live in poverty, compared to about 21 percent of high school graduates, 13 percent of those who have completed some college, and less than 6 percent of college graduates.

• Non-Caucasian/White residents are more likely than White residents to live in poverty; for example, 35 percent of persons of Hispanic descent are living in poverty compared to 11 percent of White residents.

• Non-citizens are almost twice as likely to live in poverty as citizens.

4 “Annual Update of the HHS Poverty Guidelines.” Federal Register 79 (January 22, 2014): 3593-3594

January 21, 2015

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Fig. 2: Phoenix Poverty Rate, 2005-2013

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 7 Additional Census-related data is included in the appendices to this report5,6:

• Appendix A reports demographic data across the City’s 15 planning villages. Appendix A-I includes data for all residents, Appendix A-II includes data for residents living in poverty, and Appendix A-III includes calculated poverty rates across demographic groups.

• Appendix B reports demographic data across the school districts included within HSD’s Head Start service areas. Appendices B-I and B-II are structured similarly to Appendices A-I and A-II described above, while Appendix B-III includes data for children under five years of age and living in poverty.

• Appendix C provides a number maps at the census tract level to illustrate the number of residents living in poverty in Phoenix, the number of young children living in poverty within the school districts in HSD’s Head Start service area, and the number of older residents in the City.

Employment and Housing Market As described in the 2012/2013 Community Assessment, Arizona was one of the states most impacted by the Great Recession by many measures, including percentage of jobs lost, declines in home values, and decreases in tax revenues. The national recession officially ended in June 2009 with gradual improvements occurring since then. Employment and housing indicators continue to trend in a positive direction. Comparing September 2014 to September 2013, the greater Phoenix area added 42,100 jobs, a fourth consecutive year of growth.7 Gains were widespread. Three industries with generally well-paying jobs expanded more than four percent: professional and business services (12,200 net jobs), education and health services (12,000 jobs), and financial activities (6,600 jobs). Service sector jobs also gained, with the leisure and hospitality sector adding 8,500 jobs and the trade, transportation, and utilities sector (the largest component of which is retail) added 4,500 jobs. Conversely, the construction sector lost 5,900 jobs, erasing the gains of the past two years.

5 In order to provide sub-City estimates (that is, for planning villages and school districts), information for individual census tracts were required. Only the five-year ACS dataset provides information for census tracts. The five-year estimates are therefore valuable for detailed geographic analyses and the 2009 – 2013 dataset was the source of the estimates provide in the Appendices. However, the five-year dataset are less useful for identifying trends because, for example, the 2009 – 2013 data overlaps with 80 percent of the data from 2008 – 2012 (i.e., 2013 data replaces 2008, but the other four years used in both datasets are the same). Thus, the year-to-year changes discussed in this report are based on the one-year ACS dataset for the City as a whole. 6 The numbers reported in the Community Assessment differ slightly from the official Census estimates due to minor variations created when using census tract data to report estimates by school district or planning village. A complete discussion of the methodology was included in Appendix A of the 2012/2013 Community Assessment. Note that this update has employed a slightly revised methodology in order to interpolate ‘masked’ data. 7 Queried from http://azstats.gov/ces-data-query-tool/, downloaded January 8, 2015. Statistics presented encompass the Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale Metropolitan Statistical Area, which includes Maricopa and Pinal Counties.

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 8 Despite these gains, the greater Phoenix area still had 67,000 fewer jobs, about 3.5 percent, in September 2014 than in September 2007. In particular, construction and manufacturing employment remains 47.7 percent and 14.4 percent, respectively, below 2007 levels. The unemployment rate in Phoenix has been declining since 2009. Unemployment stood at 6.0 percent in September 2014 compared to 7.1 percent in the previous year. The unemployment rate was almost twice as high, at 11.5 percent, in September 2009.8 Although sales and home price appreciation have moderated over the past year, the housing market has substantially recovered since the depths of the recession. A number of statistics from the Center for Real Estate Theory and Practice at Arizona State University illustrate these gains:9

• In September 2014 there were 1,127 ‘normal’ resales (i.e., not foreclosures, short sales, etc.) of single family homes in the City, a 5.5 percent increase over September 2013

• The median price of these resales was $190,000, a 6.1 percent increase over the prior year period

• New home sales, however, declined from 93 to 70 and ‘investor flips’ decreased from 224 to 131

• There were 57 short sales and pre-foreclosures of single family homes in September 2014, a 59 percent decline from the 140 short sales and pre-foreclosures recorded in September 2013

Home rental prices in the greater Phoenix area have not changed much in recent years. The median rental cost of a two-bedroom home in federal fiscal year 2015 is estimated to be $966 per month compared to $957 in 2014 and $925 in 2013.10 Part II: Changes in the Availability of Services for Low-Income and Other Persons and Families in Need Tax revenues have increased at the federal, State, and City levels, but growth has lagged expectations. This less-than-anticipated revenue growth coupled with rising costs in a number of areas has resulted in forecasted budget deficits at all levels of government. Despite budget increases in recent years for many programs that assist low-income individuals and families, funding for a number of these programs is still less than it was before the recession. Given budgetary pressures, it is likely only certain programs will receive targeted funding increases and other programs may be at risk of budget reductions.

8 Queried from http://azstats.gov/laus-data-query-tool/, downloaded January 8, 2015. Rates are not seasonally adjusted. The September 2014 is a preliminary estimate. 9 Orr, Michael J. Monthly Report – Greater Phoenix Housing Market – September 2014. Center for Real Estate Theory and Practice, W.P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University. Accessed January 8, 2015 from http://research.wpcarey.asu.edu/real-estate/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Full-Report-201410.pdf. 10 Information from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. http://www.huduser.org/portal/datasets/50per.html. Accessed January 8, 2015.

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 9 As discussed in the 2014 Community Assessment, the Budget Control Act of 201111 and subsequent amendments required federal funding reductions (‘sequestration’) in federal fiscal years 2013 through 2023. Over the past year, legislation increased spending over the amounts approved in the initial years of sequestration. A number of programs received funding increases compared to their post-sequester levels support low-income populations, including Head Start and Early Head Start; child care subsidies; job training programs; education grants for children with disabilities; nutrition programs including Women, Infants and Children (WIC) and home delivery services for the elderly; housing vouchers; and utility assistance. It is important to note, however, that even with these restorations, many programs remain their pre-recession funding level. Further, the federal government is expected to continue to operate at a deficit in the coming years and, as evidenced by the 2013 government ‘shut-down’, there will be ongoing pressure to reduce or slow spending. The State of Arizona’s General Fund budget for fiscal year 2015 included modest increases for certain programs and initiatives while projecting there would be a $120 million ending balance. The Joint Legislative Budget Committee now estimates the General Fund faces a $520 million deficit in the current year and a $1 billion deficit next year.12 This turnabout is due to revenue growth trailing forecasts and a Superior Court ruling that the State did not meet statutory requirements for funding public schools. The Court’s decision would require the State to increase its annual funding for public schools by more than $300 million. The Court still must decide whether the State must make payments for underfunding in previous years, which may total as much $1.7 billion. Policymakers have yet to propose a comprehensive plan to resolve these deficits, but it is likely spending cuts will be part of the solution. In January 2014, City Budget and Research staff reported Phoenix faced a fiscal year 2016 deficit of $14 to $54 million, due in large measure to revenues falling short of forecasts. The City had to address a similar deficit in the current fiscal year and has begun addressing next year’s shortfall, including the elimination of vacant positions to save $11.3 million. Funding shortfalls at all levels of government guarantees there will be continued pressure on many of the programs critical to low-income and other vulnerable populations. Several of these supports are discussed in the remainder of this Part of the Community Assessment. Health care When HSD clients were surveyed last year, 29 percent reported they did not have health insurance and 17 percent reported that either they or their child needed health care services that they could not get in the previous year. When asked about their needs, health care and health insurance was the fifth most common response from HSD clients (dental care was the most frequent response).

11 Public Law 112-25. 12 http://www.azleg.gov/jlbc/budgetupdateATRA112114.pdf.

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 10 The federal Affordable Care Act (ACA)13 was designed to increase access to health care through an expansion of the Medicaid program and subsidies for middle-income individuals and families to buy private health insurance through an ‘exchange’. Both of these provisions, which are discussed in greater detail in the 2014 Community Assessment, took effect January 1, 2014. Complete data regarding the impact of these provisions on the uninsured rates – which was 17 percent in Arizona and 24 percent in the City in 2013 – is not yet available. Preliminary data provides insight into enrollment levels, though. Data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services shows that at least 29,500 Phoenix residents purchased health insurance through the State’s exchange.14 Statewide, almost 118,000 Arizonans used the exchange to sign up for health insurance. Enrollment in the State’s Medicaid program, the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS), increased by almost 340,000, from 1.3 million to 1.6 million, between January 2014 and January 2015.15 Child Care and Preschool As reported in the 2012/2013 Community Assessment, only 34.2 percent of three and four year-olds in Arizona were enrolled in preschool, the third-lowest percentage in the nation. Across HSD’s Head Start service areas, only 25.1 percent of children in this age group were enrolled. Unsurprisingly, child care was the first or second most frequently cited need by survey respondents who receive Early Head Start or Head Start services. One factor in the State’s low preschool attendance rate is a relative lack of state funding. According to a National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER) report, The State of Preschool 2013, Arizona ranks 39th in state spending.16 Although this report covers a small segment of broader child care services, it is illustrative of the State’s relatively modest level of investment in this area. The budget for the State’s largest program, child care subsidies administered by the Department of Economic Security (DES), is about $68 million less than it was in fiscal year 2008. DES reported there were 4,737 children on a waiting list for services as of January 2, 2015. Spending by First Things First (FTF) has helped to offset funding reductions in the DES program. FTF is a voter-created agency funded through a tax on tobacco products and dedicated to the early childhood development and health of prekindergarten-age children. In fiscal year 2013, FTF spent about $42 million on its child care scholarship programs.

13 Public Law 111-148. 14 http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/2014/MarketPlaceEnrollment/EnrollmentByZip/rpt_EnrollmentByZip.cfm. Accessed January 8, 2015. Data for zip codes with fewer than 50 enrollees is not reported so the estimates cited above are almost certainly understated. 15 http://www.azahcccs.gov/reporting/Downloads/PopulationStatistics/2013/Dec/Members_by_County_Report.pdf. Accessed January 8, 2015. 16 Barnett, W.S., Carolan, M.E., Squires, J.H., Clarke Brown, K. (2013). The state of preschool 2013: State preschool yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | 11 As noted above, federal funding cuts to the Head Start and Early Head Start programs resulting from sequestration have been restored and, in fact, funding for these programs was increased. Further, $500 million was set aside to establish Early Head State-Child Care Partnership and Early Head Start Expansion grants intended to expand high quality early learning and development opportunities for infants and toddlers. To date, Arizona programs have been awarded $8.4 million, including $3.3 million for the City of Phoenix. State Funding for Other Programs A number of programs received funding increases in the State’s fiscal year 2015 budget, including17:

• A net increase of more than $160 million for K-12 education, including funds for enrollment growth and inflation, special education costs, testing, and incentive funding

• Removing Child Protective Services from the Department of Economic Security and establishing a new Department of Child Safety and a budget increase of about $90 million for transition costs, to fund 332 new staff since fiscal year 2014, and increase supports for children and families involved in the child welfare system

• $3.0 million to hire 37 Adult Protective Services staff

• $500,000 for a faith-based facility located in Phoenix that provides homelessness services, including substance abuse treatment, behavioral medicine treatment, and job training

• $300,000 for organizations to implement school-based prevention education programs promoting positive life choices and focusing on the topics of substance abuse, mental health, violence, and other risky behaviors

• $1.0 million for early intervention services for infants and toddlers with, or at risk of developmental delays

Despite these increases, funding for a number of State programs remain significantly below pre-recession levels. Further, given the State’s projected budget shortfall, it is likely many programs will be required to implement funding reductions this year and next. Conclusion Despite ongoing economic improvements, nearly one-in-four Phoenicians, more than 340,000 residents, remain living below the poverty line. Many of these residents rely on publicly-supported programs to meet their needs in terms of housing, food, medical care, and child care. Funding for many of these programs has improved over the past year, but looming federal, State, and City budget deficits threaten this progress. Given these realities, the services provided by HSD remain as critical as ever.

17 Arizona Joint Legislative Budget Committee. State of Arizona FY 2015 Appropriations Report (see p. BH14-18)

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | A-1  

January 21, 2015

Appendix A: Census Data Summaries*

Appendix Title Page

Appendix A-I Select Demographics of Phoenix Residents by Village A-2

Appendix A-II Select Demographics of Phoenix Residents Living in Poverty by Village

A-5

Appendix A-III Calculated Poverty Rates for Select Demographics by Village A-7

* Summaries based on Census Bureau’s five-year (2009 – 2013) American Community Survey (ACS)

tables. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

 

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | A-2

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Ahw

atuk

ee

Foot

hills

Alh

ambr

a

Cam

elba

ck

East

Cen

tral

City

Dee

r Val

ley

Des

ert

Vie

w

Enca

nto

Estr

ella

Lave

en

Mar

yval

e

Nor

th

Gat

eway

Nor

th

Mou

ntai

n

Para

dise

Val

ley

Rio

Vis

ta

Sou

th

Mou

ntai

n

Total Residents 6,450,758 1,494,928 80,576 134,345 133,562 52,739 174,573 49,520 55,924 79,707 52,063 212,417 17,144 163,270 172,234 5,572 111,280

Total Households 2,359,654 525,002 31,634 45,222 58,403 17,682 65,766 19,154 23,037 20,688 14,461 56,759 5,963 62,736 68,415 1,556 33,525

AgeUnder 5 years 444,625 116,781 4,773 11,596 8,883 4,049 11,946 3,247 4,086 7,553 5,287 21,814 1,513 12,307 9,199 333 10,191% of Total 6.9% 7.8% 6.2% 9.8% 6.7% 8.7% 7.5% 7.5% 7.5% 10.8% 10.4% 11.5% 9.6% 7.2% 5.5% 5.1% 9.7%5 to 14 years 900,742 228,691 10,609 22,068 16,484 8,607 25,305 7,908 6,908 15,231 9,560 41,172 3,132 20,563 21,323 835 18,986% of Total 14.0% 15.3% 13.2% 16.4% 12.3% 16.3% 14.5% 16.0% 12.4% 19.1% 18.4% 19.4% 18.3% 12.6% 12.4% 15.0% 17.1%15 to 17 years 268,895 66,925 4,124 6,570 4,157 2,412 6,761 2,241 2,145 4,488 3,066 11,859 709 6,131 6,824 128 5,311% of Total 4.2% 4.5% 5.1% 4.9% 3.1% 4.6% 3.9% 4.5% 3.8% 5.6% 5.9% 5.6% 4.1% 3.8% 4.0% 2.3% 4.8%18 to 24 years 645,275 154,497 5,940 14,570 12,077 6,651 16,619 2,435 6,247 10,438 5,082 28,318 1,222 17,909 14,911 371 11,707% of Total 10.0% 10.3% 7.4% 10.8% 9.0% 12.6% 9.5% 4.9% 11.2% 13.1% 9.8% 13.3% 7.1% 11.0% 8.7% 6.7% 10.5%25 to 34 years 860,632 231,643 10,975 18,644 23,787 8,527 26,731 6,311 9,680 14,533 9,352 31,788 2,347 24,597 24,321 1,027 19,025% of Total 13.3% 15.5% 13.6% 13.9% 17.8% 16.2% 15.3% 12.7% 17.3% 18.2% 18.0% 15.0% 13.7% 15.1% 14.1% 18.4% 17.1%35 to 44 years 823,413 214,247 12,631 19,043 19,083 7,643 25,573 8,466 8,712 11,521 7,809 29,193 3,336 20,553 24,637 921 15,125% of Total 12.8% 14.3% 15.7% 14.2% 14.3% 14.5% 14.6% 17.1% 15.6% 14.5% 15.0% 13.7% 19.5% 12.6% 14.3% 16.5% 13.6%45 to 54 years 836,395 200,366 14,207 16,799 19,442 6,878 26,299 7,613 7,488 8,409 5,756 22,139 2,105 23,366 26,106 708 13,053% of Total 13.0% 13.4% 17.6% 12.5% 14.6% 13.0% 15.1% 15.4% 13.4% 10.5% 11.1% 10.4% 12.3% 14.3% 15.2% 12.7% 11.7%55 to 64 years 743,512 150,560 10,091 12,063 14,543 4,146 20,755 5,920 5,980 4,741 3,609 14,562 1,490 19,142 22,882 648 9,989% of Total 11.5% 10.1% 12.5% 9.0% 10.9% 7.9% 11.9% 12.0% 10.7% 5.9% 6.9% 6.9% 8.7% 11.7% 13.3% 11.6% 9.0%65 to 74 years 528,498 76,916 4,339 6,365 7,749 2,306 8,953 3,385 2,779 1,914 1,563 7,281 826 11,328 12,814 293 5,024% of Total 8.2% 5.1% 5.4% 4.7% 5.8% 4.4% 5.1% 6.8% 5.0% 2.4% 3.0% 3.4% 4.8% 6.9% 7.4% 5.2% 4.5%75 years and over 398,771 54,302 2,887 6,627 7,359 1,520 5,631 1,994 1,900 878 979 4,291 463 7,375 9,218 309 2,870% of Total 6.2% 3.6% 3.6% 4.9% 5.5% 2.9% 3.2% 4.0% 3.4% 1.1% 1.9% 2.0% 2.7% 4.5% 5.4% 5.5% 2.6%

Household CompositionFamily: Married couple 1,133,910 222,054 17,055 16,276 18,215 4,515 31,976 10,765 5,781 9,690 8,114 25,890 3,406 23,973 32,207 1,035 13,155% of Total 48.1% 42.3% 53.9% 36.0% 31.2% 25.5% 48.6% 56.2% 25.1% 46.8% 56.1% 45.6% 57.1% 38.2% 47.1% 66.5% 39.2%Family: Male HH'er; no wife 124,487 33,827 1,180 3,767 2,667 1,277 4,064 723 1,713 2,005 970 5,141 253 4,008 3,066 48 2,944% of Total 5.3% 6.4% 3.7% 8.3% 4.6% 7.2% 6.2% 3.8% 7.4% 9.7% 6.7% 9.1% 4.2% 6.4% 4.5% 3.1% 8.8%Fam: Female HH'er; no husband 297,844 79,920 3,296 7,881 7,444 3,606 7,751 1,741 3,263 4,507 2,594 12,581 609 9,473 7,805 168 7,203% of Total 12.6% 15.2% 10.4% 17.4% 12.7% 20.4% 11.8% 9.1% 14.2% 21.8% 17.9% 22.2% 10.2% 15.1% 11.4% 10.8% 21.5%Non-Family: Male householder 390,959 98,418 5,188 9,443 15,507 4,956 11,181 2,477 6,903 2,895 1,348 7,167 806 12,819 11,719 247 5,762% of Total 16.6% 18.7% 16.4% 20.9% 26.6% 28.0% 17.0% 12.9% 30.0% 14.0% 9.3% 12.6% 13.5% 20.4% 17.1% 15.9% 17.2%Non-Family: Female householder 412,454 90,783 4,915 7,856 14,569 3,328 10,795 3,448 5,377 1,592 1,435 5,980 889 12,463 13,618 57 4,461% of Total 17.5% 17.3% 15.5% 17.4% 24.9% 18.8% 16.4% 18.0% 23.3% 7.7% 9.9% 10.5% 14.9% 19.9% 19.9% 3.7% 13.3%

Appendix A-I: Select Demographics of Phoenix Residents by Village

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | A-3

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Ahw

atuk

ee

Foot

hills

Alh

ambr

a

Cam

elba

ck

East

Cen

tral

City

Dee

r Val

ley

Des

ert

Vie

w

Enca

nto

Estr

ella

Lave

en

Mar

yval

e

Nor

th

Gat

eway

Nor

th

Mou

ntai

n

Para

dise

Val

ley

Rio

Vis

ta

Sou

th

Mou

ntai

n

Race/EthnicityAmerican Indian/Alaska Native 258,478 23,323 1,213 3,728 2,473 848 2,489 116 1,884 1,110 573 2,518 63 3,440 442 127 2,298% of Total 4.0% 1.6% 1.5% 2.8% 1.9% 1.6% 1.4% 0.2% 3.4% 1.4% 1.1% 1.2% 0.4% 2.1% 0.3% 2.3% 2.1%Asian 177,996 46,619 4,391 4,406 3,967 473 8,111 1,845 1,860 1,035 2,882 2,216 790 5,865 6,353 151 2,274% of Total 2.8% 3.1% 5.4% 3.3% 3.0% 0.9% 4.6% 3.7% 3.3% 1.3% 5.5% 1.0% 4.6% 3.6% 3.7% 2.7% 2.0%Black/African American 251,467 95,064 4,594 9,150 8,974 5,494 4,920 471 3,836 6,387 8,824 12,250 248 7,879 4,201 179 17,659% of Total 3.9% 6.4% 5.7% 6.8% 6.7% 10.4% 2.8% 1.0% 6.9% 8.0% 16.9% 5.8% 1.4% 4.8% 2.4% 3.2% 15.9%Hispanic 1,925,107 597,416 10,333 66,199 41,765 33,805 26,783 3,399 24,344 58,561 25,351 162,006 1,701 46,036 27,446 766 68,921% of Total 29.8% 40.0% 12.8% 49.3% 31.3% 64.1% 15.3% 6.9% 43.5% 73.5% 48.7% 76.3% 9.9% 28.2% 15.9% 13.8% 61.9%Native Hawaiian/Other Islander 11,707 2,509 45 350 150 49 83 0 38 229 96 395 19 448 120 7 481% of Total 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4%White/Caucasian 3,700,934 701,003 56,842 48,435 72,803 11,709 127,826 42,656 23,176 11,247 13,429 31,076 13,931 95,668 130,081 4,094 18,032% of Total 57.4% 46.9% 70.5% 36.1% 54.5% 22.2% 73.2% 86.1% 41.4% 14.1% 25.8% 14.6% 81.3% 58.6% 75.5% 73.5% 16.2%Two or More Races 117,607 26,599 3,014 1,828 2,976 233 4,188 1,017 768 924 885 1,680 367 3,800 3,355 231 1,333% of Total 1.8% 1.8% 3.7% 1.4% 2.2% 0.4% 2.4% 2.1% 1.4% 1.2% 1.7% 0.8% 2.1% 2.3% 1.9% 4.1% 1.2%Other 7,462 2,395 144 250 454 127 174 15 16 214 24 277 25 135 237 19 283% of Total 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3%

CitizenshipCitizen 5,907,988 1,280,778 76,723 108,007 116,924 41,160 162,687 47,924 46,690 61,438 46,818 157,782 16,653 144,429 157,266 5,298 90,978% of Total 91.6% 85.7% 95.2% 80.4% 87.5% 78.0% 93.2% 96.8% 83.5% 77.1% 89.9% 74.3% 97.1% 88.5% 91.3% 95.1% 81.8%Non-Citizen 542,770 214,150 3,853 26,338 16,638 11,579 11,886 1,596 9,234 18,269 5,245 54,636 492 18,841 14,968 274 20,302% of Total 8.4% 14.3% 4.8% 19.6% 12.5% 22.0% 6.8% 3.2% 16.5% 22.9% 10.1% 25.7% 2.9% 11.5% 8.7% 4.9% 18.2%

Language at Home (Households)English Only 1,730,974 350,872 25,334 26,857 43,126 8,592 54,117 15,936 15,086 7,875 8,045 21,083 5,030 46,040 54,781 1,316 17,655% of Total 73.4% 66.8% 80.1% 59.4% 73.8% 48.6% 82.3% 83.2% 65.5% 38.1% 55.6% 37.1% 84.3% 73.4% 80.1% 84.5% 52.7%Sometimes/Always Spanish 450,624 134,621 2,667 14,842 11,455 8,262 6,030 1,385 6,385 12,220 4,841 33,682 243 11,117 7,335 49 14,108% of Total 19.1% 25.6% 8.4% 32.8% 19.6% 46.7% 9.2% 7.2% 27.7% 59.1% 33.5% 59.3% 4.1% 17.7% 10.7% 3.1% 42.1%Sometimes/Always Other Lang. 178,056 39,509 3,633 3,522 3,821 828 5,619 1,833 1,567 593 1,576 1,994 690 5,579 6,298 192 1,762% of Total 7.5% 7.5% 11.5% 7.8% 6.5% 4.7% 8.5% 9.6% 6.8% 2.9% 10.9% 3.5% 11.6% 8.9% 9.2% 12.3% 5.3%

Linguistic Isolation (Households)Spanish Only - Ling. Isolated 88,795 32,018 122 4,416 3,303 2,742 1,289 60 1,701 3,072 416 7,601 26 2,570 1,644 0 3,056% of Total 3.8% 6.1% 0.4% 9.8% 5.7% 15.5% 2.0% 0.3% 7.4% 14.8% 2.9% 13.4% 0.4% 4.1% 2.4% 0.0% 9.1%Other Lang. Only - Ling. Iso. 26,291 7,492 446 1,188 789 353 721 148 473 83 317 497 69 1,055 975 0 378% of Total 1.1% 1.4% 1.4% 2.6% 1.4% 2.0% 1.1% 0.8% 2.1% 0.4% 2.2% 0.9% 1.2% 1.7% 1.4% 0.0% 1.1%

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | A-4

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Ahw

atuk

ee

Foot

hills

Alh

ambr

a

Cam

elba

ck

East

Cen

tral

City

Dee

r Val

ley

Des

ert

Vie

w

Enca

nto

Estr

ella

Lave

en

Mar

yval

e

Nor

th

Gat

eway

Nor

th

Mou

ntai

n

Para

dise

Val

ley

Rio

Vis

ta

Sou

th

Mou

ntai

n

Educational Attainment (Age 25+)Less than high school graduation 600,141 178,720 1,665 20,801 14,111 12,426 9,993 712 7,564 15,516 5,667 43,003 367 15,254 10,444 362 20,834% of Total 14.3% 19.3% 3.0% 26.2% 15.3% 40.1% 8.8% 2.1% 20.7% 36.9% 19.5% 39.4% 3.5% 14.3% 8.7% 9.3% 32.0%High School graduates 1,027,020 221,067 7,793 21,193 17,936 8,219 28,199 4,868 7,676 12,918 6,301 32,472 1,562 29,357 24,270 1,025 17,277% of Total 24.5% 23.8% 14.1% 26.6% 19.5% 26.5% 24.7% 14.4% 21.0% 30.8% 21.7% 29.7% 14.8% 27.6% 20.2% 26.2% 26.5%Some college, associates degree 1,437,835 282,380 18,502 22,978 26,909 5,926 44,081 9,572 10,865 9,761 9,916 25,915 3,626 37,424 39,540 1,429 15,935% of Total 34.3% 30.4% 33.6% 28.9% 29.3% 19.1% 38.7% 28.4% 29.7% 23.2% 34.1% 23.7% 34.3% 35.2% 33.0% 36.6% 24.5%Bachelor's degree or higher 1,126,225 245,867 27,169 14,569 33,005 4,447 31,667 18,538 10,433 3,801 7,183 7,863 5,013 24,325 45,723 1,090 11,040% of Total 26.9% 26.5% 49.3% 18.3% 35.9% 14.3% 27.8% 55.0% 28.6% 9.1% 24.7% 7.2% 47.4% 22.9% 38.1% 27.9% 17.0%

Employment (Age 16+)Employed 2,728,782 666,233 43,836 51,334 66,922 16,686 89,792 25,126 26,160 28,819 23,104 76,640 8,059 75,194 90,556 2,187 41,818% of Total 54.4% 59.1% 68.7% 52.2% 62.6% 42.3% 66.4% 67.0% 59.1% 51.9% 63.7% 52.7% 66.4% 58.6% 64.8% 49.9% 52.2%Not Employed 2,288,170 461,010 19,936 46,973 39,983 22,739 45,417 12,393 18,078 26,676 13,150 68,784 4,076 53,153 49,091 2,197 38,365% of Total 45.6% 40.9% 31.3% 47.8% 37.4% 57.7% 33.6% 33.0% 40.9% 48.1% 36.3% 47.3% 33.6% 41.4% 35.2% 50.1% 47.8%

Income (Households)Less than $15,000 303,132 75,219 1,445 10,181 9,348 6,578 5,178 888 4,605 3,557 1,124 10,444 291 8,869 6,281 44 6,386% of Total 12.8% 14.3% 4.6% 22.5% 16.0% 37.2% 7.9% 4.6% 20.0% 17.2% 7.8% 18.4% 4.9% 14.1% 9.2% 2.8% 19.0%$15,000 to $24,999 265,657 61,382 1,599 6,669 6,873 3,393 6,364 869 3,126 2,704 807 9,127 329 8,969 6,317 86 4,150% of Total 11.3% 11.7% 5.1% 14.7% 11.8% 19.2% 9.7% 4.5% 13.6% 13.1% 5.6% 16.1% 5.5% 14.3% 9.2% 5.5% 12.4%$25,000 to $34,999 265,719 59,842 1,811 6,218 6,998 2,025 6,556 910 2,760 3,256 1,696 8,950 382 7,821 6,044 69 4,348% of Total 11.3% 11.4% 5.7% 13.7% 12.0% 11.4% 10.0% 4.8% 12.0% 15.7% 11.7% 15.8% 6.4% 12.5% 8.8% 4.4% 13.0%$35,000 to $49,999 350,199 77,561 3,856 6,421 9,010 2,009 9,303 2,165 3,428 3,166 2,199 10,727 760 9,502 9,581 144 5,291% of Total 14.8% 14.8% 12.2% 14.2% 15.4% 11.4% 14.1% 11.3% 14.9% 15.3% 15.2% 18.9% 12.7% 15.1% 14.0% 9.3% 15.8%$50,000 to $74,999 438,460 92,527 5,637 7,472 9,368 1,695 13,282 3,472 3,525 4,226 3,084 9,626 1,095 11,478 12,437 483 5,647% of Total 18.6% 17.6% 17.8% 16.5% 16.0% 9.6% 20.2% 18.1% 15.3% 20.4% 21.3% 17.0% 18.4% 18.3% 18.2% 31.0% 16.8%$75,000 to $99,999 281,780 57,667 5,127 3,040 5,451 781 9,781 2,638 2,428 1,937 2,229 4,391 945 6,867 8,462 230 3,360% of Total 11.9% 11.0% 16.2% 6.7% 9.3% 4.4% 14.9% 13.8% 10.5% 9.4% 15.4% 7.7% 15.9% 10.9% 12.4% 14.8% 10.0%$100,000 or more 454,707 100,804 12,160 5,222 11,355 1,203 15,303 8,212 3,166 1,841 3,322 3,493 2,162 9,230 19,292 501 4,343% of Total 19.3% 19.2% 38.4% 11.5% 19.4% 6.8% 23.3% 42.9% 13.7% 8.9% 23.0% 6.2% 36.3% 14.7% 28.2% 32.2% 13.0%

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | A-5

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Ahw

atuk

ee

Foot

hills

Alh

ambr

a

Cam

elba

ck

East

Cen

tral

City

Dee

r Val

ley

Des

ert

Vie

w

Enca

nto

Estr

ella

Lave

en

Mar

yval

e

Nor

th

Gat

eway

Nor

th

Mou

ntai

n

Para

dise

Val

ley

Rio

Vis

ta

Sou

th

Mou

ntai

n

Total Residents 1,197,062 340,603 4,669 46,156 29,710 25,802 18,817 2,721 17,211 23,375 7,900 72,980 786 34,038 22,028 306 34,103

Total Households 358,347 96,720 1,622 12,943 10,844 7,452 6,488 982 5,663 5,144 1,655 16,501 309 10,960 7,367 44 8,747

AgeUnder 5 years 127,676 41,578 400 6,141 3,030 2,502 1,771 314 2,335 2,714 1,053 10,244 87 4,241 2,437 0 4,310% of Total 10.7% 12.2% 8.6% 13.3% 10.2% 9.7% 9.4% 11.5% 13.6% 11.6% 13.3% 14.0% 11.0% 12.5% 11.1% 0.0% 12.6%5 to 14 years 228,319 75,444 665 10,293 6,174 5,761 3,511 473 3,537 5,431 1,896 18,778 50 6,667 4,157 0 8,050% of Total 19.1% 22.2% 14.2% 22.3% 20.8% 22.3% 18.7% 17.4% 20.6% 23.2% 24.0% 25.7% 6.3% 19.6% 18.9% 0.0% 23.6%15 to 17 years 61,225 19,033 349 2,752 1,296 1,361 1,212 108 843 1,363 556 4,615 41 1,460 1,098 0 1,980% of Total 5.1% 5.6% 7.5% 6.0% 4.4% 5.3% 6.4% 4.0% 4.9% 5.8% 7.0% 6.3% 5.2% 4.3% 5.0% 0.0% 5.8%18 to 24 years 195,647 44,500 677 5,429 3,492 3,510 2,418 178 2,139 2,952 1,341 9,919 149 5,284 2,849 56 4,107% of Total 16.3% 13.1% 14.5% 11.8% 11.8% 13.6% 12.9% 6.5% 12.4% 12.6% 17.0% 13.6% 19.0% 15.5% 12.9% 18.3% 12.0%25 to 34 years 164,029 49,433 690 6,679 4,269 3,153 2,834 550 2,761 4,032 992 9,364 99 4,819 3,913 78 5,202% of Total 13.7% 14.5% 14.8% 14.5% 14.4% 12.2% 15.1% 20.2% 16.0% 17.3% 12.6% 12.8% 12.6% 14.2% 17.8% 25.6% 15.3%35 to 44 years 132,996 43,664 532 6,171 4,240 3,341 2,260 398 2,409 2,967 1,008 9,462 85 3,671 2,824 94 4,202% of Total 11.1% 12.8% 11.4% 13.4% 14.3% 12.9% 12.0% 14.6% 14.0% 12.7% 12.8% 13.0% 10.8% 10.8% 12.8% 30.7% 12.3%45 to 54 years 116,236 32,327 571 4,636 3,339 2,978 2,459 204 1,279 2,205 574 5,416 64 3,829 1,903 34 2,838% of Total 9.7% 9.5% 12.2% 10.0% 11.2% 11.5% 13.1% 7.5% 7.4% 9.4% 7.3% 7.4% 8.1% 11.2% 8.6% 11.1% 8.3%55 to 64 years 90,568 20,277 487 2,432 2,279 1,817 1,470 283 1,043 1,140 323 3,010 111 2,771 1,312 8 1,791% of Total 7.6% 6.0% 10.4% 5.3% 7.7% 7.0% 7.8% 10.4% 6.1% 4.9% 4.1% 4.1% 14.1% 8.1% 6.0% 2.8% 5.3%65 to 74 years 43,275 8,099 134 1,000 810 860 460 146 483 338 38 1,280 75 834 653 0 989% of Total 3.6% 2.4% 2.9% 2.2% 2.7% 3.3% 2.4% 5.4% 2.8% 1.4% 0.5% 1.8% 9.6% 2.4% 3.0% 0.0% 2.9%75 years and over 37,092 6,247 165 624 780 519 423 68 384 232 118 893 25 465 883 36 633% of Total 3.1% 1.8% 3.5% 1.4% 2.6% 2.0% 2.2% 2.5% 2.2% 1.0% 1.5% 1.2% 3.2% 1.4% 4.0% 11.6% 1.9%

Household CompositionFamily: Married couple 84,529 23,456 384 3,231 1,839 1,385 1,443 245 913 1,780 561 5,882 72 2,046 1,602 0 2,074% of Total 23.6% 24.3% 23.7% 25.0% 17.0% 18.6% 22.2% 25.0% 16.1% 34.6% 33.9% 35.6% 23.2% 18.7% 21.7% 0.0% 23.7%Family: Male HH'er; no wife 25,155 8,124 95 1,410 603 533 496 59 700 416 242 1,400 6 743 420 0 1,001% of Total 7.0% 8.4% 5.9% 10.9% 5.6% 7.2% 7.7% 6.1% 12.4% 8.1% 14.6% 8.5% 1.9% 6.8% 5.7% 0.0% 11.4%Fam: Female HH'er; no husband 92,341 28,176 345 3,824 2,740 2,419 1,495 141 1,266 1,668 592 5,636 34 3,437 1,746 12 2,821% of Total 25.8% 29.1% 21.3% 29.5% 25.3% 32.5% 23.0% 14.4% 22.4% 32.4% 35.8% 34.2% 10.9% 31.4% 23.7% 28.3% 32.3%Non-Family: Male householder 72,711 18,724 513 2,231 2,821 1,354 1,598 302 1,329 564 114 2,067 114 2,310 2,052 19 1,337% of Total 20.3% 19.4% 31.6% 17.2% 26.0% 18.2% 24.6% 30.8% 23.5% 11.0% 6.9% 12.5% 36.8% 21.1% 27.8% 43.3% 15.3%Non-Family: Female householder 83,611 18,240 285 2,247 2,841 1,761 1,456 233 1,456 716 146 1,516 84 2,424 1,549 12 1,514% of Total 23.3% 18.9% 17.6% 17.4% 26.2% 23.6% 22.4% 23.8% 25.7% 13.9% 8.8% 9.2% 27.2% 22.1% 21.0% 28.3% 17.3%

Appendix A-II: Select Demographics of Phoenix Residents Living in Poverty by Village

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | A-6

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Ahw

atuk

ee

Foot

hills

Alh

ambr

a

Cam

elba

ck

East

Cen

tral

City

Dee

r Val

ley

Des

ert

Vie

w

Enca

nto

Estr

ella

Lave

en

Mar

yval

e

Nor

th

Gat

eway

Nor

th

Mou

ntai

n

Para

dise

Val

ley

Rio

Vis

ta

Sou

th

Mou

ntai

n

Race/EthnicityAmerican Indian/Alaska Native 102,576 7,381 240 1,690 945 414 638 2 739 499 19 593 15 968 146 2 472% of Total 8.6% 2.2% 5.1% 3.7% 3.2% 1.6% 3.4% 0.1% 4.3% 2.1% 0.2% 0.8% 1.9% 2.8% 0.7% 0.7% 1.4%Asian 27,061 7,237 397 1,338 702 236 670 38 689 287 261 346 20 1,037 871 2 343% of Total 2.3% 2.1% 8.5% 2.9% 2.4% 0.9% 3.6% 1.4% 4.0% 1.2% 3.3% 0.5% 2.5% 3.0% 4.0% 0.8% 1.0%Black/African American 67,079 29,931 510 4,440 3,625 2,644 848 70 1,282 1,830 1,430 3,975 1 2,938 1,210 3 5,127% of Total 5.6% 8.8% 10.9% 9.6% 12.2% 10.2% 4.5% 2.6% 7.4% 7.8% 18.1% 5.4% 0.1% 8.6% 5.5% 0.9% 15.0%Hispanic 549,374 208,985 595 28,829 13,966 18,251 4,527 344 10,661 18,547 4,884 61,126 128 13,880 8,181 151 24,913% of Total 45.9% 61.4% 12.7% 62.5% 47.0% 70.7% 24.1% 12.6% 61.9% 79.3% 61.8% 83.8% 16.2% 40.8% 37.1% 49.5% 73.1%Native Hawaiian/Other Islander 2,770 921 1 181 51 2 14 0 7 0 0 162 0 225 0 0 279% of Total 0.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8%White/Caucasian 418,125 80,062 2,631 9,072 9,442 4,115 11,341 2,204 3,674 2,003 1,110 6,144 607 13,972 10,975 137 2,635% of Total 34.9% 23.5% 56.3% 19.7% 31.8% 15.9% 60.3% 81.0% 21.3% 8.6% 14.0% 8.4% 77.2% 41.0% 49.8% 44.7% 7.7%Two or More Races 28,304 5,400 287 528 795 90 758 63 159 132 190 567 13 953 557 4 303% of Total 2.4% 1.6% 6.1% 1.1% 2.7% 0.3% 4.0% 2.3% 0.9% 0.6% 2.4% 0.8% 1.7% 2.8% 2.5% 1.2% 0.9%Other 1,772 686 10 78 183 50 20 0 0 77 6 68 2 66 88 7 30% of Total 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.6% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 2.2% 0.1%

CitizenshipCitizen 1,016,527 258,816 4,357 34,496 23,247 19,518 16,555 2,556 12,779 15,297 6,629 50,999 727 27,499 18,047 306 25,804% of Total 84.9% 76.0% 93.3% 74.7% 78.2% 75.6% 88.0% 93.9% 74.2% 65.4% 83.9% 69.9% 92.5% 80.8% 81.9% 100.0% 75.7%Non-Citizen 180,535 81,787 312 11,660 6,463 6,284 2,262 165 4,432 8,078 1,271 21,982 59 6,539 3,981 0 8,298% of Total 15.1% 24.0% 6.7% 25.3% 21.8% 24.4% 12.0% 6.1% 25.8% 34.6% 16.1% 30.1% 7.5% 19.2% 18.1% 0.0% 24.3%

Educational Attainment (Age 25+)Less than high school graduation 188,307 65,027 209 9,043 5,254 6,399 1,746 79 3,228 6,693 1,132 15,557 35 4,770 2,641 0 8,241% of Total 32.2% 40.6% 8.1% 42.0% 33.4% 50.5% 17.6% 4.8% 38.6% 61.3% 37.1% 52.9% 7.6% 29.1% 23.0% 0.0% 52.6%High School graduates 175,422 45,693 892 6,977 4,021 3,325 3,346 382 2,324 2,714 771 8,346 108 5,227 2,852 166 4,241% of Total 30.0% 28.5% 34.6% 32.4% 25.6% 26.2% 33.8% 23.1% 27.8% 24.9% 25.2% 28.4% 23.5% 31.9% 24.8% 66.4% 27.1%Some college, associates degree 161,831 35,901 828 4,375 4,159 2,172 3,609 508 1,768 1,485 934 4,438 176 4,797 3,979 64 2,608% of Total 27.7% 22.4% 32.1% 20.3% 26.5% 17.1% 36.4% 30.8% 21.2% 13.6% 30.6% 15.1% 38.3% 29.3% 34.6% 25.7% 16.7%Bachelor's degree or higher 58,636 13,427 649 1,146 2,283 771 1,204 680 1,037 24 218 1,082 140 1,594 2,015 20 563% of Total 10.0% 8.4% 25.2% 5.3% 14.5% 6.1% 12.2% 41.2% 12.4% 0.2% 7.1% 3.7% 30.5% 9.7% 17.5% 7.9% 3.6%

Employment (Age 16+)Employed 244,516 63,486 1,153 7,748 6,876 3,593 4,320 552 3,254 3,409 1,285 12,726 185 7,437 5,854 40 5,054% of Total 29.7% 29.2% 32.6% 26.9% 34.1% 21.0% 32.5% 29.4% 29.4% 23.1% 26.8% 30.0% 29.8% 32.8% 38.7% 13.1% 23.9%Not Employed 578,316 154,187 2,387 21,090 13,298 13,554 8,954 1,326 7,796 11,348 3,514 29,645 436 15,244 9,268 266 16,063% of Total 70.3% 70.8% 67.4% 73.1% 65.9% 79.0% 67.5% 70.6% 70.6% 76.9% 73.2% 70.0% 70.2% 67.2% 61.3% 86.9% 76.1%

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | A-7

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Ahw

atuk

ee

Foot

hills

Alh

ambr

a

Cam

elba

ck

East

Cen

tral

City

Dee

r Val

ley

Des

ert

Vie

w

Enca

nto

Estr

ella

Lave

en

Mar

yval

e

Nor

th

Gat

eway

Nor

th

Mou

ntai

n

Para

dise

Val

ley

Rio

Vis

ta

Sou

th

Mou

ntai

n

Residents 18.6% 22.8% 5.8% 34.4% 22.2% 48.9% 10.8% 5.5% 30.8% 29.3% 15.2% 34.4% 4.6% 20.8% 12.8% 5.5% 30.6%Households 15.2% 18.4% 5.1% 28.6% 18.6% 42.1% 9.9% 5.1% 24.6% 24.9% 11.4% 29.1% 5.2% 17.5% 10.8% 2.8% 26.1%

AgeUnder 5 years 28.7% 35.6% 8.4% 53.0% 34.1% 61.8% 14.8% 9.7% 57.1% 35.9% 19.9% 47.0% 5.7% 34.5% 26.5% 0.0% 42.3%5 to 11 years 25.3% 33.0% 6.3% 46.6% 37.5% 66.9% 13.9% 6.0% 51.2% 35.7% 19.8% 45.6% 1.6% 32.4% 19.5% 0.0% 42.4%12 to 17 years 22.8% 28.4% 8.5% 41.9% 31.2% 56.4% 17.9% 4.8% 39.3% 30.4% 18.1% 38.9% 5.8% 23.8% 16.1% 0.0% 37.3%18 to 24 years 30.3% 28.8% 11.4% 37.3% 28.9% 52.8% 14.5% 7.3% 34.2% 28.3% 26.4% 35.0% 12.2% 29.5% 19.1% 15.1% 35.1%25 to 34 years 19.1% 21.3% 6.3% 35.8% 17.9% 37.0% 10.6% 8.7% 28.5% 27.7% 10.6% 29.5% 4.2% 19.6% 16.1% 7.6% 27.3%35 to 44 years 16.2% 20.4% 4.2% 32.4% 22.2% 43.7% 8.8% 4.7% 27.6% 25.8% 12.9% 32.4% 2.5% 17.9% 11.5% 10.2% 27.8%45 to 54 years 13.9% 16.1% 4.0% 27.6% 17.2% 43.3% 9.3% 2.7% 17.1% 26.2% 10.0% 24.5% 3.0% 16.4% 7.3% 4.8% 21.7%55 to 64 years 12.2% 13.5% 4.8% 20.2% 15.7% 43.8% 7.1% 4.8% 17.4% 24.0% 9.0% 20.7% 7.5% 14.5% 5.7% 1.3% 17.9%65 to 74 years 8.2% 10.5% 3.1% 15.7% 10.5% 37.3% 5.1% 4.3% 17.4% 17.7% 2.4% 17.6% 9.1% 7.4% 5.1% 0.0% 19.7%75 years and over 9.3% 11.5% 5.7% 9.4% 10.6% 34.1% 7.5% 3.4% 20.2% 26.4% 12.1% 20.8% 5.5% 6.3% 9.6% 11.5% 22.1%

Household CompositionFamily: Married couple 7.5% 10.6% 2.3% 19.8% 10.1% 30.7% 4.5% 2.3% 15.8% 18.4% 6.9% 22.7% 2.1% 8.5% 5.0% 0.0% 15.8%Family: Male HH'er; no wife 20.2% 24.0% 8.1% 37.4% 22.6% 41.7% 12.2% 8.2% 40.8% 20.7% 24.9% 27.2% 2.4% 18.5% 13.7% 0.0% 34.0%Fam: Female HH'er; no husband 31.0% 35.3% 10.5% 48.5% 36.8% 67.1% 19.3% 8.1% 38.8% 37.0% 22.8% 44.8% 5.5% 36.3% 22.4% 7.4% 39.2%Non-Family: Male householder 18.6% 19.0% 9.9% 23.6% 18.2% 27.3% 14.3% 12.2% 19.3% 19.5% 8.5% 28.8% 14.1% 18.0% 17.5% 7.6% 23.2%Non-Family: Female householder 20.3% 20.1% 5.8% 28.6% 19.5% 52.9% 13.5% 6.8% 27.1% 45.0% 10.2% 25.4% 9.5% 19.4% 11.4% 21.5% 33.9%

Race/EthnicityAmerican Indian/Alaska Native 39.7% 31.6% 19.8% 45.3% 38.2% 48.8% 25.6% 1.7% 39.2% 44.9% 3.4% 23.6% 23.3% 28.1% 33.0% 1.6% 20.6%Asian 15.2% 15.5% 9.0% 30.4% 17.7% 50.0% 8.3% 2.0% 37.0% 27.7% 9.1% 15.6% 2.5% 17.7% 13.7% 1.6% 15.1%Black/African American 26.7% 31.5% 11.1% 48.5% 40.4% 48.1% 17.2% 14.8% 33.4% 28.7% 16.2% 32.4% 0.4% 37.3% 28.8% 1.6% 29.0%Hispanic 28.5% 35.0% 5.8% 43.5% 33.4% 54.0% 16.9% 10.1% 43.8% 31.7% 19.3% 37.7% 7.5% 30.2% 29.8% 19.8% 36.1%Native Hawaiian/Other Islander 23.7% 36.7% 1.5% 51.8% 34.2% 3.6% 17.0% 0.0% 18.4% 0.0% 0.0% 40.9% 0.2% 50.2% 0.0% 1.6% 58.0%White/Caucasian 11.3% 11.4% 4.6% 18.7% 13.0% 35.1% 8.9% 5.2% 15.9% 17.8% 8.3% 19.8% 4.4% 14.6% 8.4% 3.3% 14.6%Two or More Races 24.1% 20.3% 9.5% 28.9% 26.7% 38.6% 18.1% 6.2% 20.7% 14.3% 21.5% 33.8% 3.7% 25.1% 16.6% 1.6% 22.7%Other 23.7% 28.6% 6.8% 31.1% 40.4% 39.0% 11.7% 0.0% 2.7% 36.0% 23.4% 24.6% 9.9% 49.1% 37.1% 35.2% 10.7%

CitizenshipCitizen 17.2% 20.2% 5.7% 31.9% 19.9% 47.4% 10.2% 5.3% 27.4% 24.9% 14.2% 32.3% 4.4% 19.0% 11.5% 5.8% 28.4%Non-Citizen 33.3% 38.2% 8.1% 44.3% 38.8% 54.3% 19.0% 10.3% 48.0% 44.2% 24.2% 40.2% 12.0% 34.7% 26.6% 0.0% 40.9%

Appendix A-III: Calculated Poverty Rates for Select Demographics by Village

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | A-8

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Ahw

atuk

ee

Foot

hills

Alh

ambr

a

Cam

elba

ck

East

Cen

tral

City

Dee

r Val

ley

Des

ert

Vie

w

Enca

nto

Estr

ella

Lave

en

Mar

yval

e

Nor

th

Gat

eway

Nor

th

Mou

ntai

n

Para

dise

Val

ley

Rio

Vis

ta

Sou

th

Mou

ntai

n

Educational Attainment (Age 25+)Less than high school graduation 31.4% 36.4% 12.6% 43.5% 37.2% 51.5% 17.5% 11.1% 42.7% 43.1% 20.0% 36.2% 9.5% 31.3% 25.3% 0.0% 39.6%High School graduates 17.1% 20.7% 11.4% 32.9% 22.4% 40.5% 11.9% 7.8% 30.3% 21.0% 12.2% 25.7% 6.9% 17.8% 11.8% 16.2% 24.6%Some college, associates degree 11.3% 12.7% 4.5% 19.0% 15.5% 36.7% 8.2% 5.3% 16.3% 15.2% 9.4% 17.1% 4.9% 12.8% 10.1% 4.5% 16.4%Bachelor's degree or higher 5.2% 5.5% 2.4% 7.9% 6.9% 17.3% 3.8% 3.7% 9.9% 0.6% 3.0% 13.8% 2.8% 6.6% 4.4% 1.8% 5.1%

Employment (Age 16+)Employed 9.0% 9.5% 2.6% 15.1% 10.3% 21.5% 4.8% 2.2% 12.4% 11.8% 5.6% 16.6% 2.3% 9.9% 6.5% 1.8% 12.1%Not Employed 25.3% 33.4% 12.0% 44.9% 33.3% 59.6% 19.7% 10.7% 43.1% 42.5% 26.7% 43.1% 10.7% 28.7% 18.9% 12.1% 41.9%

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department 2015 Community Assessment

Page | B-1  

January 21, 2015

Appendix B: Head Start Delegate Agency Demographics

Appendix Title Page

Appendix B-I Select Demographics of Residents in School Districts Served by Phoenix Head Start

B-2

Appendix B-II Select Demographics of Residents Living in Poverty in School Districts Served by Phoenix Head Start

B-5

Appendix B-III Select Demographics of Children Under 5 Years of Age Living in Poverty in School Districts Served by Phoenix Head Start

B-7

* Summaries based on Census Bureau’s five-year (2009 – 2013) American Community Survey

(ACS) tables. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.

 

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | B-2

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Earl

y H

ead

S

tart All

D

istr

icts

Alh

ambr

a

Car

twri

ght

Dee

r Val

ley

Fow

ler

Isaa

c

Lave

en

Mur

phy

Pend

erga

st

Phoe

nix

Elem

enta

ry

Riv

ersi

de

Roo

seve

lt

Was

hing

ton

Wils

on

Total Residents 6,450,758 1,494,928 713,822 887,282 74,048 116,859 139,571 28,601 43,493 44,099 14,361 39,901 53,493 6,752 102,494 220,497 3,111

Total Households 2,359,654 525,002 230,243 283,860 20,881 29,828 49,964 8,753 11,509 12,352 2,743 11,815 19,552 1,867 30,354 83,274 968

AgeUnder 5 years 444,625 116,781 62,942 77,445 7,858 11,601 10,555 3,333 4,796 4,468 886 3,574 3,959 606 9,444 16,151 214% of Total 6.9% 7.8% 8.8% 8.7% 10.6% 9.9% 7.6% 11.7% 11.0% 10.1% 6.2% 9.0% 7.4% 9.0% 9.2% 7.3% 6.9%5 to 14 years 900,742 228,691 118,092 146,796 14,394 23,421 21,144 5,006 8,736 7,502 2,305 7,396 7,657 1,325 18,194 29,168 548% of Total 14.0% 15.3% 16.5% 16.5% 19.4% 20.0% 15.1% 17.5% 20.1% 17.0% 16.1% 18.5% 14.3% 19.6% 17.8% 13.2% 17.6%15 to 17 years 268,895 66,925 34,809 42,843 4,257 6,662 5,614 1,521 2,438 2,691 655 2,128 2,183 381 5,068 9,117 127% of Total 4.2% 4.5% 4.9% 4.8% 5.7% 5.7% 4.0% 5.3% 5.6% 6.1% 4.6% 5.3% 4.1% 5.6% 4.9% 4.1% 4.1%18 to 24 years 645,275 154,497 81,151 100,350 8,728 15,712 12,504 4,124 5,688 4,529 2,070 4,834 6,346 966 10,448 24,068 334% of Total 10.0% 10.3% 11.4% 11.3% 11.8% 13.4% 9.0% 14.4% 13.1% 10.3% 14.4% 12.1% 11.9% 14.3% 10.2% 10.9% 10.8%25 to 34 years 860,632 231,643 107,367 136,896 11,107 16,763 20,696 4,979 6,339 7,586 2,812 6,472 8,830 1,211 17,253 32,216 634% of Total 13.3% 15.5% 15.0% 15.4% 15.0% 14.3% 14.8% 17.4% 14.6% 17.2% 19.6% 16.2% 16.5% 17.9% 16.8% 14.6% 20.4%35 to 44 years 823,413 214,247 101,337 125,348 10,452 16,197 22,670 3,700 5,811 6,990 2,285 5,806 7,259 977 13,871 28,734 596% of Total 12.8% 14.3% 14.2% 14.1% 14.1% 13.9% 16.2% 12.9% 13.4% 15.9% 15.9% 14.6% 13.6% 14.5% 13.5% 13.0% 19.2%45 to 54 years 836,395 200,366 88,630 109,988 7,926 12,017 20,287 3,238 4,119 5,043 1,837 4,502 7,430 738 11,768 30,761 323% of Total 13.0% 13.4% 12.4% 12.4% 10.7% 10.3% 14.5% 11.3% 9.5% 11.4% 12.8% 11.3% 13.9% 10.9% 11.5% 14.0% 10.4%55 to 64 years 743,512 150,560 64,435 79,990 4,972 8,108 15,515 1,641 2,880 3,044 948 3,018 5,353 308 9,073 24,948 182% of Total 11.5% 10.1% 9.0% 9.0% 6.7% 6.9% 11.1% 5.7% 6.6% 6.9% 6.6% 7.6% 10.0% 4.6% 8.9% 11.3% 5.8%65 to 74 years 528,498 76,916 32,415 40,259 2,244 3,820 6,613 748 1,642 1,300 327 1,573 2,636 153 4,797 14,321 83% of Total 8.2% 5.1% 4.5% 4.5% 3.0% 3.3% 4.7% 2.6% 3.8% 2.9% 2.3% 3.9% 4.9% 2.3% 4.7% 6.5% 2.7%75 years and over 398,771 54,302 22,644 27,368 2,110 2,558 3,974 310 1,045 947 235 598 1,841 88 2,579 11,014 69% of Total 6.2% 3.6% 3.2% 3.1% 2.8% 2.2% 2.8% 1.1% 2.4% 2.1% 1.6% 1.5% 3.4% 1.3% 2.5% 5.0% 2.2%

Household CompositionFamily: Married couple 1,133,910 222,054 102,185 120,876 7,653 13,537 26,942 3,774 4,940 6,954 1,018 5,847 4,965 887 12,451 31,650 258% of Total 48.1% 42.3% 44.4% 42.6% 36.6% 45.4% 53.9% 43.1% 42.9% 56.3% 37.1% 49.5% 25.4% 47.5% 41.0% 38.0% 26.6%Family: Male HH'er; no wife 124,487 33,827 17,439 21,688 2,302 3,093 2,899 655 1,122 885 277 765 1,361 183 2,545 5,535 67% of Total 5.3% 6.4% 7.6% 7.6% 11.0% 10.4% 5.8% 7.5% 9.8% 7.2% 10.1% 6.5% 7.0% 9.8% 8.4% 6.6% 6.9%Fam: Fem. HH'er; no husband 297,844 79,920 39,558 50,310 4,715 6,650 5,511 2,168 2,486 2,158 680 2,338 3,275 474 6,615 13,058 183% of Total 12.6% 15.2% 17.2% 17.7% 22.6% 22.3% 11.0% 24.8% 21.6% 17.5% 24.8% 19.8% 16.7% 25.4% 21.8% 15.7% 18.9%Non-Family: Male HH'er 390,959 98,418 37,310 48,590 3,676 3,483 7,618 1,546 1,356 1,092 471 1,859 5,603 198 4,943 16,482 263% of Total 16.6% 18.7% 16.2% 17.1% 17.6% 11.7% 15.2% 17.7% 11.8% 8.8% 17.2% 15.7% 28.7% 10.6% 16.3% 19.8% 27.1%Non-Family: Female HH'er 412,454 90,783 33,751 42,395 2,536 3,066 6,993 610 1,604 1,262 297 1,006 4,348 124 3,801 16,549 198% of Total 17.5% 17.3% 14.7% 14.9% 12.1% 10.3% 14.0% 7.0% 13.9% 10.2% 10.8% 8.5% 22.2% 6.7% 12.5% 19.9% 20.5%

Appendix B-I: Select Demographics of Residents in School Districts Served by Phoenix Head Start

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | B-3

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Earl

y H

ead

S

tart All

D

istr

icts

Alh

ambr

a

Car

twri

ght

Dee

r Val

ley

Fow

ler

Isaa

c

Lave

en

Mur

phy

Pend

erga

st

Phoe

nix

Elem

enta

ry

Riv

ersi

de

Roo

seve

lt

Was

hing

ton

Wils

on

Race/EthnicityAmer. Indian/Alaska Native 258,478 23,323 11,678 14,854 1,329 1,248 1,363 370 784 486 272 549 859 213 1,993 5,335 52% of Total 4.0% 1.6% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.1% 1.0% 1.3% 1.8% 1.1% 1.9% 1.4% 1.6% 3.2% 1.9% 2.4% 1.7%Asian 177,996 46,619 22,485 25,527 3,200 721 7,097 364 290 2,661 96 820 1,025 181 1,901 7,152 19% of Total 2.8% 3.1% 3.1% 2.9% 4.3% 0.6% 5.1% 1.3% 0.7% 6.0% 0.7% 2.1% 1.9% 2.7% 1.9% 3.2% 0.6%Black/African American 251,467 95,064 39,698 63,000 4,582 5,503 3,536 1,586 1,580 7,245 1,137 3,268 4,886 890 16,976 11,509 302% of Total 3.9% 6.4% 5.6% 7.1% 6.2% 4.7% 2.5% 5.5% 3.6% 16.4% 7.9% 8.2% 9.1% 13.2% 16.6% 5.2% 9.7%Hispanic 1,925,107 597,416 339,004 444,691 50,416 93,842 19,627 21,423 37,805 21,194 10,546 24,122 29,046 4,494 64,146 66,080 1,948% of Total 29.8% 40.0% 47.5% 50.1% 68.1% 80.3% 14.1% 74.9% 86.9% 48.1% 73.4% 60.5% 54.3% 66.6% 62.6% 30.0% 62.6%Nat. Hawaiian/Oth. Islander 11,707 2,509 1,431 1,829 179 225 105 105 0 96 24 114 33 0 341 607 0% of Total 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.4% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0%White/Caucasian 3,700,934 701,003 286,900 322,808 13,529 14,442 103,960 4,057 2,858 11,679 2,253 10,401 17,291 906 15,666 125,066 699% of Total 57.4% 46.9% 40.2% 36.4% 18.3% 12.4% 74.5% 14.2% 6.6% 26.5% 15.7% 26.1% 32.3% 13.4% 15.3% 56.7% 22.5%Two or More Races 117,607 26,599 11,699 13,266 639 803 3,785 453 105 715 26 555 324 68 1,198 4,577 18% of Total 1.8% 1.8% 1.6% 1.5% 0.9% 0.7% 2.7% 1.6% 0.2% 1.6% 0.2% 1.4% 0.6% 1.0% 1.2% 2.1% 0.6%Other 7,462 2,395 926 1,307 174 74 98 241 70 24 7 73 28 0 273 171 73% of Total 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.8% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 2.4%

CitizenshipCitizenship 5,907,988 1,280,778 592,007 732,483 52,072 82,824 131,357 21,916 29,475 39,524 10,318 34,249 43,676 5,656 84,139 194,935 2,343% of Total 91.6% 85.7% 82.9% 82.6% 70.3% 70.9% 94.1% 76.6% 67.8% 89.6% 71.8% 85.8% 81.6% 83.8% 82.1% 88.4% 75.3%Non-Citizen 542,770 214,150 121,815 154,799 21,975 34,035 8,214 6,686 14,018 4,576 4,044 5,652 9,818 1,097 18,355 25,562 768% of Total 8.4% 14.3% 17.1% 17.4% 29.7% 29.1% 5.9% 23.4% 32.2% 10.4% 28.2% 14.2% 18.4% 16.2% 17.9% 11.6% 24.7%

Language at Home (Households)English Only 1,730,974 350,872 139,724 168,552 8,133 9,558 41,178 3,455 3,229 6,724 1,002 6,380 11,475 757 15,909 60,311 441% of Total 73.4% 66.8% 60.7% 59.4% 38.9% 32.0% 82.4% 39.5% 28.1% 54.4% 36.5% 54.0% 58.7% 40.5% 52.4% 72.4% 45.5%Sometimes/Always Spanish 450,624 134,621 73,527 95,734 10,865 19,448 4,097 5,040 7,984 4,194 1,698 4,936 7,153 1,060 12,873 15,904 482% of Total 19.1% 25.6% 31.9% 33.7% 52.0% 65.2% 8.2% 57.6% 69.4% 34.0% 61.9% 41.8% 36.6% 56.8% 42.4% 19.1% 49.8%Sometimes/Always Other Lang. 178,056 39,509 16,991 19,573 1,884 822 4,688 259 296 1,434 42 499 924 50 1,571 7,059 45% of Total 7.5% 7.5% 7.4% 6.9% 9.0% 2.8% 9.4% 3.0% 2.6% 11.6% 1.5% 4.2% 4.7% 2.7% 5.2% 8.5% 4.7%

Linguistic Isolation (Households)Spanish Only - Ling. Isolated 88,795 32,018 17,446 22,963 3,545 4,007 726 1,077 2,812 364 547 977 2,095 165 2,684 3,773 191% of Total 3.8% 6.1% 7.6% 8.1% 17.0% 13.4% 1.5% 12.3% 24.4% 3.0% 19.9% 8.3% 10.7% 8.9% 8.8% 4.5% 19.7%Other Lang. Only - Ling. Iso. 26,291 7,492 3,532 4,290 796 165 478 63 105 283 10 178 363 8 368 1,455 17% of Total 1.1% 1.4% 1.5% 1.5% 3.8% 0.6% 1.0% 0.7% 0.9% 2.3% 0.4% 1.5% 1.9% 0.4% 1.2% 1.7% 1.7%

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | B-4

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Earl

y H

ead

S

tart All

D

istr

icts

Alh

ambr

a

Car

twri

ght

Dee

r Val

ley

Fow

ler

Isaa

c

Lave

en

Mur

phy

Pend

erga

st

Phoe

nix

Elem

enta

ry

Riv

ersi

de

Roo

seve

lt

Was

hing

ton

Wils

on

Educational Attainment (Age 25+)Less than high school grad. 600,141 178,720 98,162 132,455 15,347 26,000 7,177 4,884 11,633 4,938 4,288 5,367 10,229 998 18,923 21,818 853% of Total 14.3% 19.3% 23.5% 25.5% 39.5% 43.7% 8.0% 33.4% 53.3% 19.8% 50.8% 24.4% 30.7% 28.7% 31.9% 15.4% 45.2%High School graduates 1,027,020 221,067 113,401 139,984 11,435 17,994 20,563 4,195 5,986 5,420 2,527 6,620 8,056 1,157 15,591 40,031 409% of Total 24.5% 23.8% 27.2% 26.9% 29.5% 30.3% 22.9% 28.7% 27.4% 21.8% 29.9% 30.1% 24.2% 33.3% 26.3% 28.2% 21.7%Some college, assoc. degree 1,437,835 282,380 130,166 154,199 9,520 12,350 34,688 3,634 3,399 8,435 1,293 7,349 7,492 1,065 14,863 49,726 386% of Total 34.3% 30.4% 31.2% 29.7% 24.5% 20.8% 38.6% 24.9% 15.6% 33.9% 15.3% 33.5% 22.5% 30.7% 25.0% 35.0% 20.5%Bachelor's degree or higher 1,126,225 245,867 75,100 93,210 2,510 3,120 27,327 1,905 817 6,116 336 2,633 7,572 255 9,963 30,418 239% of Total 26.9% 26.5% 18.0% 17.9% 6.5% 5.2% 30.4% 13.0% 3.7% 24.6% 4.0% 12.0% 22.7% 7.3% 16.8% 21.4% 12.7%

Employment (Age 16+)Employed 2,728,782 666,233 299,558 359,982 25,693 39,812 69,872 12,206 13,119 19,876 2,523 17,138 18,887 2,843 37,967 99,000 1,046% of Total 54.4% 59.1% 57.5% 55.5% 51.0% 50.0% 66.0% 61.5% 45.1% 63.5% 23.2% 60.8% 45.8% 61.2% 52.0% 57.5% 44.9%Not Employed 2,288,170 461,010 221,514 288,558 24,709 39,795 35,986 7,628 15,978 11,417 8,372 11,070 22,308 1,799 35,083 73,132 1,283% of Total 45.6% 40.9% 42.5% 44.5% 49.0% 50.0% 34.0% 38.5% 54.9% 36.5% 76.8% 39.2% 54.2% 38.8% 48.0% 42.5% 55.1%

Income (Households)Less than $15,000 303,132 75,219 34,593 47,977 5,514 5,890 3,379 1,356 3,627 1,071 1,039 1,005 6,319 282 5,715 12,469 310% of Total 12.8% 14.3% 15.0% 16.9% 26.4% 19.7% 6.8% 15.5% 31.5% 8.7% 37.9% 8.5% 32.3% 15.1% 18.8% 15.0% 32.0%$15,000 to $24,999 265,657 61,382 30,417 37,716 3,424 5,453 4,140 1,092 2,320 696 518 1,237 3,063 104 3,525 11,950 193% of Total 11.3% 11.7% 13.2% 13.3% 16.4% 18.3% 8.3% 12.5% 20.2% 5.6% 18.9% 10.5% 15.7% 5.6% 11.6% 14.4% 20.0%$25,000 to $34,999 265,719 59,842 29,871 36,671 3,391 4,961 4,455 1,580 1,592 1,304 455 1,779 2,139 372 4,102 10,438 104% of Total 11.3% 11.4% 13.0% 12.9% 16.2% 16.6% 8.9% 18.0% 13.8% 10.6% 16.6% 15.1% 10.9% 19.9% 13.5% 12.5% 10.7%$35,000 to $49,999 350,199 77,561 36,259 43,467 3,662 5,562 6,739 1,695 1,565 1,941 354 2,384 2,191 401 4,515 12,311 147% of Total 14.8% 14.8% 15.7% 15.3% 17.5% 18.6% 13.5% 19.4% 13.6% 15.7% 12.9% 20.2% 11.2% 21.5% 14.9% 14.8% 15.2%$50,000 to $74,999 438,460 92,527 42,221 50,130 2,965 4,721 10,313 1,454 1,516 2,479 211 2,450 2,181 384 5,370 15,938 148% of Total 18.6% 17.6% 18.3% 17.7% 14.2% 15.8% 20.6% 16.6% 13.2% 20.1% 7.7% 20.7% 11.2% 20.6% 17.7% 19.1% 15.3%$75,000 to $99,999 281,780 57,667 24,633 29,033 1,176 1,795 7,854 949 533 1,976 73 1,626 1,228 185 3,046 8,539 53% of Total 11.9% 11.0% 10.7% 10.2% 5.6% 6.0% 15.7% 10.8% 4.6% 16.0% 2.7% 13.8% 6.3% 9.9% 10.0% 10.3% 5.5%$100,000 or more 454,707 100,804 32,249 38,866 750 1,447 13,083 627 355 2,885 92 1,334 2,431 139 4,081 11,629 13% of Total 19.3% 19.2% 14.0% 13.7% 3.6% 4.9% 26.2% 7.2% 3.1% 23.4% 3.3% 11.3% 12.4% 7.4% 13.4% 14.0% 1.3%

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | B-5

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Ear

ly H

ead

S

tart All

Dis

tric

ts

Alh

ambr

a

Car

twrigh

t

Dee

r Val

ley

Fow

ler

Isaa

c

Lave

en

Mur

phy

Pend

erga

st

Phoe

nix

Elem

enta

ry

Riv

ersi

de

Roo

seve

lt

Was

hing

ton

Wils

on

Total Residents 1,197,062 340,603 181,445 243,492 31,368 44,358 13,131 7,058 20,912 6,900 7,389 7,592 23,117 1,357 30,135 48,764 1,410

Total Households 358,347 96,720 47,691 64,237 7,795 9,632 4,317 1,934 5,014 1,463 1,410 1,773 7,043 334 7,680 15,429 413

AgeUnder 5 years 127,676 41,578 23,978 30,715 4,917 6,343 1,110 1,078 2,880 932 555 814 2,374 189 3,691 5,715 116% of Total 10.7% 12.2% 13.2% 12.6% 15.7% 14.3% 8.5% 15.3% 13.8% 13.5% 7.5% 10.7% 10.3% 13.9% 12.2% 11.7% 8.2%5 to 14 years 228,319 75,444 42,546 55,731 7,538 11,399 2,099 1,702 5,553 1,665 1,347 2,124 4,573 319 6,885 10,148 381% of Total 19.1% 22.2% 23.4% 22.9% 24.0% 25.7% 16.0% 24.1% 26.6% 24.1% 18.2% 28.0% 19.8% 23.5% 22.8% 20.8% 27.0%15 to 17 years 61,225 19,033 10,904 14,234 1,895 2,981 1,013 279 1,216 488 365 403 1,080 76 1,795 2,552 90% of Total 5.1% 5.6% 6.0% 5.8% 6.0% 6.7% 7.7% 4.0% 5.8% 7.1% 4.9% 5.3% 4.7% 5.6% 6.0% 5.2% 6.4%18 to 24 years 195,647 44,500 23,806 32,159 3,628 5,951 1,554 944 2,437 1,135 1,123 1,021 3,305 200 3,768 6,936 156% of Total 16.3% 13.1% 13.1% 13.2% 11.6% 13.4% 11.8% 13.4% 11.7% 16.5% 15.2% 13.5% 14.3% 14.7% 12.5% 14.2% 11.1%25 to 34 years 164,029 49,433 24,918 34,272 4,963 5,460 1,697 1,098 2,948 829 1,594 1,095 3,061 131 4,506 6,696 194% of Total 13.7% 14.5% 13.7% 14.1% 15.8% 12.3% 12.9% 15.6% 14.1% 12.0% 21.6% 14.4% 13.2% 9.7% 15.0% 13.7% 13.7%35 to 44 years 132,996 43,664 23,164 30,877 3,674 5,927 1,879 768 2,572 936 960 1,133 2,720 216 3,791 6,059 243% of Total 11.1% 12.8% 12.8% 12.7% 11.7% 13.4% 14.3% 10.9% 12.3% 13.6% 13.0% 14.9% 11.8% 15.9% 12.6% 12.4% 17.2%45 to 54 years 116,236 32,327 16,453 22,639 2,708 3,259 1,956 698 1,488 553 801 485 2,809 158 2,459 5,145 119% of Total 9.7% 9.5% 9.1% 9.3% 8.6% 7.3% 14.9% 9.9% 7.1% 8.0% 10.8% 6.4% 12.2% 11.7% 8.2% 10.6% 8.4%55 to 64 years 90,568 20,277 9,776 13,641 1,153 1,835 1,191 283 1,017 211 401 368 1,736 37 1,654 3,681 74% of Total 7.6% 6.0% 5.4% 5.6% 3.7% 4.1% 9.1% 4.0% 4.9% 3.1% 5.4% 4.8% 7.5% 2.8% 5.5% 7.5% 5.3%65 to 74 years 43,275 8,099 3,452 5,470 557 787 369 119 418 32 168 87 863 3 963 1,080 25% of Total 3.6% 2.4% 1.9% 2.2% 1.8% 1.8% 2.8% 1.7% 2.0% 0.5% 2.3% 1.1% 3.7% 0.2% 3.2% 2.2% 1.7%75 years and over 37,092 6,247 2,447 3,753 336 418 262 89 381 119 75 62 596 28 622 752 13% of Total 3.1% 1.8% 1.3% 1.5% 1.1% 0.9% 2.0% 1.3% 1.8% 1.7% 1.0% 0.8% 2.6% 2.1% 2.1% 1.5% 0.9%

Household CompositionFamily: Married couple 84,529 23,456 13,639 17,198 2,110 3,528 1,123 543 1,781 495 382 773 1,219 129 1,882 3,157 76% of Total 23.6% 24.3% 28.6% 26.8% 27.1% 36.6% 26.0% 28.1% 35.5% 33.9% 27.1% 43.6% 17.3% 38.5% 24.5% 20.5% 18.3%Family: Male HH'er; no wife 25,155 8,124 4,167 5,682 969 870 364 79 500 179 83 66 569 15 827 1,124 35% of Total 7.0% 8.4% 8.7% 8.8% 12.4% 9.0% 8.4% 4.1% 10.0% 12.3% 5.9% 3.7% 8.1% 4.5% 10.8% 7.3% 8.4%Fam: Female HH'er; no husband 92,341 28,176 15,105 20,179 2,605 3,359 876 807 1,431 539 438 549 1,977 141 2,526 4,798 132% of Total 25.8% 29.1% 31.7% 31.4% 33.4% 34.9% 20.3% 41.7% 28.5% 36.8% 31.1% 31.0% 28.1% 42.1% 32.9% 31.1% 32.0%Non-Family: Male householder 72,711 18,724 7,605 10,616 1,046 1,091 951 145 888 102 256 100 1,516 46 1,165 3,235 73% of Total 20.3% 19.4% 15.9% 16.5% 13.4% 11.3% 22.0% 7.5% 17.7% 7.0% 18.2% 5.7% 21.5% 13.8% 15.2% 21.0% 17.6%Non-Family: Female householder 83,611 18,240 7,175 10,563 1,065 785 1,002 359 414 147 250 284 1,761 3 1,280 3,115 98% of Total 23.3% 18.9% 15.0% 16.4% 13.7% 8.1% 23.2% 18.6% 8.3% 10.1% 17.8% 16.0% 25.0% 1.0% 16.7% 20.2% 23.7%

Appendix B-II: Select Demographics of Residents Living in Poverty in School Districts Served by Phoenix Head Start

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | B-6

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Ear

ly H

ead

S

tart All

Dis

tric

ts

Alh

ambr

a

Car

twrigh

t

Dee

r Val

ley

Fow

ler

Isaa

c

Lave

en

Mur

phy

Pend

erga

st

Phoe

nix

Elem

enta

ry

Riv

ersi

de

Roo

seve

lt

Was

hing

ton

Wils

on

Race/EthnicityAmerican Indian/Alaska Native 102,576 7,381 3,452 4,476 762 372 203 139 149 19 253 91 369 75 381 1,639 22% of Total 8.6% 2.2% 1.9% 1.8% 2.4% 0.8% 1.5% 2.0% 0.7% 0.3% 3.4% 1.2% 1.6% 5.5% 1.3% 3.4% 1.5%Asian 27,061 7,237 3,796 4,721 1,147 238 590 94 47 262 57 49 578 42 289 1,326 2% of Total 2.3% 2.1% 2.1% 1.9% 3.7% 0.5% 4.5% 1.3% 0.2% 3.8% 0.8% 0.6% 2.5% 3.1% 1.0% 2.7% 0.1%Black/African American 67,079 29,931 12,975 20,384 2,195 2,609 569 313 766 1,356 722 293 2,212 158 4,336 4,715 141% of Total 5.6% 8.8% 7.2% 8.4% 7.0% 5.9% 4.3% 4.4% 3.7% 19.7% 9.8% 3.9% 9.6% 11.6% 14.4% 9.7% 10.0%Hispanic 549,374 208,985 120,085 164,016 23,151 37,315 3,081 5,892 19,007 4,246 5,223 5,585 15,240 946 22,437 20,861 1,033% of Total 45.9% 61.4% 66.2% 67.4% 73.8% 84.1% 23.5% 83.5% 90.9% 61.5% 70.7% 73.6% 65.9% 69.7% 74.5% 42.8% 73.3%Native Hawaiian/Other Islander 2,770 921 582 804 83 120 14 0 0 0 0 42 2 0 221 323 0% of Total 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0%White/Caucasian 418,125 80,062 37,590 45,636 3,835 3,232 8,049 486 903 869 1,116 1,469 4,600 109 2,161 18,637 170% of Total 34.9% 23.5% 20.7% 18.7% 12.2% 7.3% 61.3% 6.9% 4.3% 12.6% 15.1% 19.3% 19.9% 8.1% 7.2% 38.2% 12.0%Two or More Races 28,304 5,400 2,704 3,118 166 441 611 39 29 141 13 63 110 27 285 1,185 8% of Total 2.4% 1.6% 1.5% 1.3% 0.5% 1.0% 4.7% 0.6% 0.1% 2.1% 0.2% 0.8% 0.5% 2.0% 0.9% 2.4% 0.5%Other 1,772 686 260 336 30 31 13 94 11 6 4 1 7 0 25 78 36% of Total 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 1.3% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 2.5%

CitizenshipCitizenship 1,016,527 258,816 134,274 180,018 21,590 30,552 11,427 4,740 13,531 5,873 4,578 6,031 17,621 1,108 22,564 39,418 986% of Total 84.9% 76.0% 74.0% 73.9% 68.8% 68.9% 87.0% 67.2% 64.7% 85.1% 62.0% 79.4% 76.2% 81.6% 74.9% 80.8% 69.9%Non-Citizen 180,535 81,787 47,171 63,473 9,779 13,806 1,704 2,318 7,380 1,027 2,811 1,562 5,496 250 7,571 9,346 424% of Total 15.1% 24.0% 26.0% 26.1% 31.2% 31.1% 13.0% 32.8% 35.3% 14.9% 38.0% 20.6% 23.8% 18.4% 25.1% 19.2% 30.1%

Educational Attainment (Age 25+)Less than high school graduation 188,307 65,027 33,966 50,138 6,605 9,263 1,264 1,482 5,571 922 2,997 1,385 5,333 254 7,462 7,221 380% of Total 32.2% 40.6% 42.3% 45.3% 49.3% 52.4% 17.2% 48.5% 63.1% 34.4% 74.9% 42.9% 45.3% 44.2% 53.3% 30.8% 57.0%High School graduates 175,422 45,693 24,479 32,431 4,235 5,393 2,219 840 2,277 721 835 831 3,190 199 3,787 7,761 142% of Total 30.0% 28.5% 30.5% 29.3% 31.6% 30.5% 30.2% 27.5% 25.8% 26.9% 20.9% 25.7% 27.1% 34.6% 27.1% 33.1% 21.3%Some college, associates degree 161,831 35,901 16,937 21,966 2,047 2,529 2,863 467 838 857 456 764 2,173 106 2,296 6,465 105% of Total 27.7% 22.4% 21.1% 19.9% 15.3% 14.3% 38.9% 15.3% 9.5% 32.0% 11.4% 23.7% 18.4% 18.4% 16.4% 27.6% 15.7%Bachelor's degree or higher 58,636 13,427 4,829 6,119 504 500 1,008 266 140 180 -289 250 1,087 15 451 1,966 40% of Total 10.0% 8.4% 6.0% 5.5% 3.8% 2.8% 13.7% 8.7% 1.6% 6.7% -7.2% 7.7% 9.2% 2.7% 3.2% 8.4% 6.1%

Employment (Age 16+)Employed 244,516 63,486 33,648 42,140 5,332 7,711 2,948 1,451 3,111 1,129 665 1,571 3,192 253 4,394 10,142 240% of Total 29.7% 29.2% 30.2% 27.6% 29.2% 30.2% 30.5% 35.0% 25.8% 27.2% 12.4% 34.5% 20.2% 31.5% 23.1% 31.5% 26.8%Not Employed 578,316 154,187 77,732 110,344 12,917 17,849 6,709 2,694 8,933 3,023 4,689 2,989 12,633 550 14,639 22,065 655% of Total 70.3% 70.8% 69.8% 72.4% 70.8% 69.8% 69.5% 65.0% 74.2% 72.8% 87.6% 65.5% 79.8% 68.5% 76.9% 68.5% 73.2%

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department2015 Community Assessment

Page | B-7

Ari

zon

a

Ph

oen

ix

Earl

y H

ead

S

tart All

D

istr

icts

Alh

ambr

a

Car

twrigh

t

Dee

r Val

ley

Fow

ler

Isaa

c

Lave

en

Mur

phy

Pend

erga

st

Phoe

nix

Elem

enta

ry

Riv

ersi

de

Roo

seve

lt

Was

hing

ton

Wils

on

Total Children Under 5 Years in Poverty 127,676 41,578 23,978 30,715 4,917 6,343 1,110 1,078 2,880 932 555 814 2,374 189 3,691 5,715 116

Est. EHS Eligible (0-2) 76,606 24,947 14,387 18,429 2,950 3,806 666 647 1,728 559 333 489 1,425 114 2,215 3,429 70Est. HS Eligible (3-4) 51,071 16,631 9,591 12,286 1,967 2,537 444 431 1,152 373 222 326 950 76 1,476 2,286 46

Total Households 79,883 26,206 14,782 19,128 2,942 3,970 731 707 1,773 505 330 511 1,528 115 2,412 3,528 76

Household CompositionFamily: Married couple 31,086 9,977 6,057 7,580 1,056 1,817 337 290 857 218 141 302 499 60 850 1,121 33% of Total 38.9% 38.1% 41.0% 39.6% 35.9% 45.8% 46.1% 41.1% 48.3% 43.2% 42.7% 59.0% 32.6% 52.2% 35.2% 31.8% 43.2%Family: Male HH'er; no wife 9,999 3,540 1,867 2,373 540 386 128 41 267 83 27 23 136 9 336 390 7% of Total 12.5% 13.5% 12.6% 12.4% 18.4% 9.7% 17.5% 5.8% 15.1% 16.5% 8.3% 4.5% 8.9% 7.4% 13.9% 11.1% 9.4%Fam: Female HH'er; no husband 38,798 12,689 6,857 9,175 1,346 1,768 266 376 649 203 162 186 894 46 1,226 2,017 36% of Total 48.6% 48.4% 46.4% 48.0% 45.8% 44.5% 36.4% 53.2% 36.6% 40.2% 49.0% 36.5% 58.5% 40.4% 50.8% 57.2% 47.4%

Race/EthnicityAmerican Indian/Alaska Native 12,169 1,006 460 596 152 18 32 11 10 4 2 0 33 4 101 229 0% of Total 9.5% 2.4% 1.9% 1.9% 3.1% 0.3% 2.9% 1.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 1.4% 1.9% 2.7% 4.0% 0.2%Asian 1,781 751 508 562 200 15 54 0 3 36 0 47 47 0 7 152 0% of Total 1.4% 1.8% 2.1% 1.8% 4.1% 0.2% 4.9% 0.0% 0.1% 3.9% 0.0% 5.8% 2.0% 0.0% 0.2% 2.7% 0.0%Black/African American 7,667 4,014 2,144 2,778 403 428 71 20 11 224 0 34 165 24 449 929 21% of Total 6.0% 9.7% 8.9% 9.0% 8.2% 6.7% 6.4% 1.9% 0.4% 24.1% 0.0% 4.1% 7.0% 12.4% 12.2% 16.3% 18.5%Hispanic 73,614 30,092 18,063 23,489 3,999 5,486 367 1,000 2,783 604 552 567 1,916 156 2,868 3,102 89% of Total 57.7% 72.4% 75.3% 76.5% 81.3% 86.5% 33.0% 92.8% 96.6% 64.8% 99.4% 69.6% 80.7% 82.7% 77.7% 54.3% 76.4%Native Hawaiian/Other Islander 358 170 85 128 0 0 7 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 66 0% of Total 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 1.2% 0.0%White/Caucasian 23,879 3,866 1,823 2,128 95 158 442 20 58 14 1 106 180 6 120 924 3% of Total 18.7% 9.3% 7.6% 6.9% 1.9% 2.5% 39.8% 1.9% 2.0% 1.5% 0.2% 13.0% 7.6% 3.0% 3.2% 16.2% 2.8%Two or More Races 8,091 1,616 891 999 65 239 137 15 15 46 0 60 31 0 77 313 0% of Total 6.3% 3.9% 3.7% 3.3% 1.3% 3.8% 12.4% 1.4% 0.5% 5.0% 0.0% 7.4% 1.3% 0.0% 2.1% 5.5% 0.4%Other 118 62 4 35 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 26 0 2% of Total 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 1.7%

Appendix B-III: Select Demographics of Children Under 5 Years of Age Living in Poverty in School Districts Served by Phoenix Head Start

January 21, 2015

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-1

January 21, 2015

Appendix C: Maps of Residents Living in Poverty

Appendix Title Page

Appendix C-I Residents Living in Poverty in Phoenix by Census Tract with Family

Services Center Locations

C-2

Appendix C-II Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

for School Districts Served by Phoenix Head Start

C-3

Appendix C-III Distribution Of Adults Over 55 By Census Tract With Planning

Village and Senior Center Locations

C-16

Appendix C-IV Distribution Of Adults Over 55 In Poverty By Census Tract By

Planning Village and Senior Center Locations

C-17

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-2

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-I: Residents Living in Poverty in Phoenix by Census Tract with Family Services

Center Locations

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-3

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Alhambra School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-4

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Cartwright School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-5

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Deer Valley School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-6

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Fowler School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-7

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Isaac School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-8

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Laveen School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-9

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Murphy School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-10

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Pendergast School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-11

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Phoenix Elementary School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-12

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Riverside School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-13

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Roosevelt School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-14

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Washington School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-15

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-II: Children Under Five Years of Age Living in Poverty by Census Tract

Wilson School District

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-16

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-III: Distribution of Adults Over 55 by Census Tract with Planning Village and

Senior Center Locations

City of Phoenix Human Services Department

2015 Community Assessment

Page | C-17

January 21, 2015

Appendix C-IV: Distribution of Adults Over 55 in Poverty by Census Tract by Planning Village

and Senior Center Locations