Community-acquired Pneumonia - RCP London
Transcript of Community-acquired Pneumonia - RCP London
Conflicts of Interest
Paid member, Data Monitoring CommitteeCAPITA (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) study. Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: 2010 – May 2012
Speaker fee / Accommodation / travel expenses only for :European Pneumo Update, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018
• Background• Diagnosis• Causes• Severity assessment• Treatment – antibiotics• Treatment – other• Prevention
• Background• Diagnosis• Causes• Severity assessment• Treatment – antibiotics• Treatment – other• Prevention
112838
166373
268961
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
2006-2007 2011-2012 2016-2017
Pneumonia – EnglandAdmissions
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/hospital-admitted-patient-care-activity/
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
300000
350000
2006-2007 2011-2012 2016-2017
0-14
15-59
60-74
>74
Pneumonia – EnglandAdmissions – by Age band
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/hospital-admitted-patient-care-activity/
• Background• Diagnosis• Causes• Severity assessment• Treatment – antibiotics• Treatment – other• Prevention
n = 1251 compared with adults with CAP (n=6660)
Were older (median 80 vs 78 years, p<0.001)Had more comorbid disease, Significantly fewer respiratory symptoms (fever, cough, dyspnoea, pleuritic pain), More constitutional symptoms (general deterioration, falls)
Lower 30-day inpatient mortality (14.3% vs 17.0%, adjusted OR 0.75,p=0.003)
52% miscoded as having pneumonia were treated as having CAP, …..these constitute cases of miscoding due to misdiagnosis rather than coder-related error
Daniel et al Thorax 2017 ;72:376-379
Upchurch et al Chest 2017
Aug 9. pii: S0012-3692(17)31392-2. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.07.035
• hospital length of stay,
• ICU admission,
• mechanical ventilation, and
• shock,
were similar between groups
• In-hospital death was rare in both the CT-only and
• pneumonia on CXR groups (0% vs 2%).
CT CAP
• Background• Diagnosis• Causes• Severity assessment• Treatment – antibiotics• Treatment – other• Prevention
IllnessSeverity
Time
Clinical Presentation
PneumoniaEvolution
Key Decision Point
Usually pneumococcal
IllnessSeverity
Time
Clinical Presentation
PneumoniaEvolution
Key Decision Point
Usually pneumococcal
PneumococcalLegionellaStaphylococcus
Little time!
Penicillin
Macrolide
Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. UK
Total number of tested isolates (N) and percentages non-susceptible 2013–2016
n %
https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/home
2016
• Background• Diagnosis• Causes• Severity assessment• Treatment – antibiotics• Treatment – other• Prevention
Severity Assessment
Prognostic value – predicts mortality
Assists in
• Place of care home/hospital/ICU
• Intensity of investigation
• Antibiotic therapy
• What to tell patient / family
11.7
23.4
0
5
10
15
20
25
Direct Delayed
Outcome related to ICU Transfer Mode
28-day mortality %
Renaud et al Crit Care Med 2009;37:2867-2874
Direct = straight from EDDelayed = within 3 days of admission
Mortality (%) related to CURB-65 score
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 or 1 Two 3 or more
CURB-65 score
CRB65
ATS/IDSA
1.5%
mortality
9.2%
Lim et al Thorax 2003;58:377-382, Fine et al NEJM 1997;336:243-250
1.5%
9.2%
22%
Severity assessment in hospital
• When a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia is made at presentation to hospital, determine whether patients are at low, intermediate or high risk of death using the CURB65 score.
• Use clinical judgement in conjunction with the CURB65 score to guide the management of community-acquired pneumonia, as follows:
• consider home-based care for patients with a CURB65 score of 0 or 1• consider hospital-based care for patients with a CURB65 score of 2 or
more• consider intensive care assessment for patients with a CURB65 score of 3
or more.[Based on prognostic cohort studies of moderate to very low quality with a large number of patients, and the experience and opinion of the GDG]
• Stratify patients presenting with community-acquired pneumonia into those with low-, moderate- or high-severity disease. The grade of severity will usually correspond to the risk of death.
[Based on the experience and opinion of the GDG]
www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg191
Low intermediate High Low intermediate High
CRB65 CURB65
Pneumonia Patient Distribution by Mortality Risk Score
Lim et al Thorax 2003;58:377-382
n = 718
1.2% 8.1% 31% 1.5% 9.2% 22%
**
Low intermediate High Low intermediate High
CRB65 CURB65
Antibiotic Choice by Mortality Risk Score
Lim et al Thorax 2003;58:377-382
n = 718
1.2% 8.1% 31% 1.5% 9.2% 22%
**
AmoxicillinB-lactam + macrolideB-lactam + macrolide
• Background• Diagnosis• Causes• Severity assessment• Treatment – antibiotics• Treatment – other• Prevention
• Offer a 5-day course of a single antibiotic to patients with low-severity community-acquired pneumonia.
• Consider amoxicillin in preference to a macrolide or a tetracycline.
www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg191
• Offer a 5-day course of a single antibiotic to patients with low-severity community-acquired pneumonia.
• Consider amoxicillin in preference to a macrolide or a tetracycline.
• Consider dual antibiotic therapy with amoxicillin and a macrolide for patients with moderate-severity community-acquired pneumonia.
• Consider dual antibiotic therapy with a beta-lactamase stable beta-lactam and a macrolide for patients with high-severity community-acquired pneumonia.
www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg191
JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1894-1901. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4887
We did not find noninferiority of β-lactam monotherapy inpatients hospitalized for moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia
N Engl J Med 2015;372:1312-23. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406330
…..empirical treatment with beta-lactam monotherapy was non-inferior tostrategies with a beta-lactam–macrolide combination or fluoroquinolonemonotherapy with regard to 90-day mortality
Outcome = % not reaching clinical stability
Outcome = mortality
Macfarlane et al J Infect 1983;7:111-117
One third of patients made an complicated / delayed recovery or died……
…There appear to be good reasons for using ampicillin and erythromycin together….
15 consecutive patients were studied…..there were no deaths, and 10 patients made an uncomplicated recovery
BTS AUDIT 2014-20156786 cases at 158 hospitals
Antibiotic – CURB65 3 - 5
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Guideline Audit
Other
B-L + M
B-lactam
35% under treated with B-lactam alone
Timely diagnosis and treatment
• Put in place processes to allow diagnosis (including X-rays) and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia within 4 hours of presentation to hospital.
• Offer antibiotic therapy as soon as possible after diagnosis, and certainly within 4 hours to all patients with community-acquired pneumonia who are admitted to hospital.
[Based on observational cohort studies of low to very low quality with a large number of patients]
www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg191
Time to first antibiotic (hours)
first antibiotic dose within 4 h of admission was associated
with a 16% lower adjusted 30-day IP
mortality compared with later antibiotic administration
Time to First Antibiotic
Daniel P, et al. Thorax 2016 Jun;71(6):568-70
< 4 4-8 8-12 >12
16
17
18
19
20
2009 2010 2011 2012 2014
35
40
45
50
2009 2010 2011 2012 2014
0
20
40
60
80
2009 2010 2011 2012 2014
%
30-day mortality
CURB-65 0 - 1
Antibiotic within 4 hours
OR (AOR) for mortality from 2009 (reference) to 2014
AOR 0.86 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.08)
p for trend=0.004
24,187 cases in 218 hospitals
Daniel P, et al. Thorax 2016;71:1061–1063
• Offer a 5-day course of a single antibiotic to patients with low-severity community-acquired pneumonia.
• Consider amoxicillin in preference to a macrolide or a tetracycline.
www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg191
• Multicentre, non-inferiority randomized clinical trial • Hospitalized patients diagnosed as having CAP 4 teaching hospitals in Spain
control group duration of antibiotics was determined by physicians as usual in clinical practice.
Uranga et al JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1257-65
Usual Antibiotic
intervention group
treated with antibiotics for minimum 5 days,
stopped at this point if temperature was ≤ 37.8°C
for 48 hours and ≤ than 1 clinical instability,
Admission Day 5
Randomised
Antibiotic
duration
(median days)
Uranga et al JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Sep 1;176(9):1257-65
n 150 162 p
30-day mortality (%) 2.2 2.1 NS
Day 10 clinical success(%) 48.6 56.3 .18
Day 30 clinical success(%) 88.6 91.9 .33
Day 10 Mean symptom score 18.6 17.9 .69
Low-severity community-acquired pneumonia
• Offer a 5-day course of a single antibiotic to patients with low-severity community-acquired pneumonia.
[Based on moderate to very low quality evidence from randomised controlled trials, a cost analysis with limitations, and the experience and opinion of the GDG]
Moderate- and high-severity community-acquired pneumonia
• Consider a 7- to 10-day course of antibiotic therapy for patients with moderate- or high-severity community-acquired pneumonia.
[Based on the experience and opinion of the GDG]
www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg191
Oseltamivir and zanamivir cause small reductions in the time to first alleviation of influenza symptoms in adults. The use of oseltamivir increases the risk of nausea, vomiting, psychiatric events in adults and vomiting in children.
Oseltamivir has no protective effect on mortality among patients with 2009A/H1N1 influenza.
Prophylaxis with either NI may reduce symptomatic influenza in individuals and inhouseholds.
The balance between benefits and harms should be considered when making decisions about use of NIs for either prophylaxis or treatment of influenza.
Heneghan CJ, et al Health Technol Assess 2016;20(42)
Compared with no treatment, neuraminidase inhibitor treatment (irrespective of timing) was associated with a reduction in mortality risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·81; 95% CI 0·70–0·93; p=0·0024).
Compared with later treatment, early treatment (within 2 days of symptom onset) was associated with a reduction in mortality risk (adjusted OR 0·48; 95% CI 0·41–0·56; p<0·0001).
There was an increase in the mortality hazard rate with each day’s delay ininitiation of treatment up to day 5 as compared with treatment initiated within 2 days of symptom onset (adjusted hazard ratio [HR 1·23] [95% CI 1·18–1·28]; p<0·0001 for the increasing HR with each day’s delay)
Muthuri et al Lancet Respir Med 2014;2: 395–404
• Background• Diagnosis• Causes• Severity assessment• Treatment – antibiotics• Treatment – other• Prevention
Meta-analyses
Salluh 2010
Nie 2012
Siemieniuk 2015
Horita 2015
Chen 2015
Marti 2015
Wan 2016
Bi 2016
Wu 2018
Briel 2018
Original Studies
Wagner 1955
Bennett 1963
Klastersky 1971
McHardy 1972
Marik 1993
Confalonieri 2005
El Ghamrawy 2006
Mikami 2007
Snijders 2010
Fernandez-Serano 2011
Meijvis 2011
Sabry 2011
Nafae 2013
Blum 2015
Torres 2015
Steroid Treatment for CAP
Among patients with septic shock undergoing mechanical
ventilation, a continuous infusion of hydrocortisone did not
result in lower 90-day mortality than placebo
35% of 3698 cases had pulmonary infection
Mortality 28%
Venkatesh et al N Engl J Med 2018;378:797-808
….90-day all-cause mortality was lower among those who
received hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone than among
those who received placebo
59% of 1240 cases had pulmonary infection
Mortality 45%
Annane et al N Engl J Med 2018;378:378:809-818
Rochberg et al Crit CareMed 2018;146:1411-1420
Conclusion: In critically ill patients with sepsis,
corticosteroids possibly result in a small reduction in mortality
while also possibly increasing the risk of neuromuscular weakness
the use of corticosteroids in sepsis may result in a small absolute
reduction in mortality of approximately 2% …. but the CI
around the estimate includes no effect
Our panel make a weak recommendation to give corticosteroids to people with all types
and severity of sepsis, based on new evidence.
Because we are not certain that they are beneficial, it is also reasonable not to prescribe
them.
Patients’ values and preferences may guide this decision-making process.
Lamontagne et al Brit Med J 2018; 362:k3284 doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3284
CPAP (NIV) in CAP
Confalonieri et al AJRCCM,1999;160:1585-1591
CPAP Control
All 6/28 (21%) 17/28 (61%) 0.35 (0.16-0.76)
without COPD 6/16 (37.5%) 8/17 (47.1%) 0.80 (0.35-1.79)
with COPD 0/12 (0%) 6/11 (54.5%) 0.07 (0.00-1.13)
Need for Intubation OR
NIV and CPAP compared with usual care
• No recommendation made.
• No studies were found comparing NIV (Bi-level CPAP) to CPAP or usual care.Two RCTs comparing CPAP to usual care were identified
• The GDG noted that the number of patients included in the available studies was small, with a degree of imprecision around many of the results. The evidence from the post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with CAP with and without COPD should be interpreted with caution as it included a very small sample size.
NIV, CPAP and usual care compared with elective intubation
• No suitable studies were identified
• No recommendation made.
www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg191
A CRP that fails to fall by 50% or more within 4 days of admission is
independently associated with
increased 30 day mortality (OR 24.5; 6.4-93.4), P .0001;
mechanical ventilation and/or inotropic support (OR 7.1; 2.8-17.8), P .0001
and complicated pneumonia (OR 15.4; 6.32-37.6), P .0001.
REPEAT CRP WITHIN 4 DAYS OF ADMISSION
Chalmers et al Am J Med 2008;121:219-225
0
5
10
15
20
25
30 d mortality AV / inotropes complications
Day 4 CRP decreased by >49%
Day 4 CRP decreased by < 50%
%
Monitoring in hospital
• Consider measuring a baseline C-reactive protein concentration in patients with community-acquired pneumonia on admission to hospital, and repeat the test if clinical progress is uncertain after 48 to 72 hours.
[Based on low to very low quality observational cohort studies, and the experience and opinion of the GDG]
www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg191
Instabilities
Temp > 37.8
Resp Rate > 24/min
Heart Rate > 100/min
SBP ≤ 90
SaO2 < 90%
Altered mental status
Can’t maintain oral intake
PREDICTION OF SAFE HOSPITAL DISCHARGE IN CAP
N = 680
130 (19%) 1 instability
at discharge
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Mor
talit
y
Rea
dmission
s
Major
Eve
nts
not B
TN
0 1 2
No of
instabilities
Halm et al Arch Int Med 2002;162:1278-1284
Safe discharge from hospital
• Do not routinely discharge patients with community-acquired pneumonia if in the past 24 hours they have had 2 or more of the following findings:• temperature higher than 37.5°C• respiratory rate 24 breaths per minute or more• heart rate over 100 beats per minute• systolic blood pressure 90 mmHg or less• oxygen saturation under 90% on room air• abnormal mental status• inability to eat without assistance.
• Consider delaying discharge if their temperature is higher than 37.5°C.[Based on evidence from moderate to very low quality prognostic cohort studies at low risk of bias]
www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg191
• Background• Diagnosis• Causes• Severity assessment• Treatment – antibiotics• Treatment – other• Prevention
Older adults receiving the influenza vaccine may experience less influenza over a single season compared with placebo, from 6% to 2.4% (risk ratio (RR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.66; low-certainty evidence
The study providing data for mortality and pneumonia was underpowered to detect differences in these outcomes. No data on hospitalisations were reported
The available evidence relating to complications is of poor quality, insufficient, or old and provides no clear guidance for public health regarding the safety, efficacy, or effectiveness of influenza vaccines for people aged 65 years or older. Society should invest in research on a new generation of influenza vaccines for the elderly.
Demicheli V, et al.CochraneDatabase of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 2. Art.No.:CD004876. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004876.pub4
Pneumococcal disease infections caused by serotypes in Prevenar 13 vaccine
www.gov.uk/government/collections/pneumococcal-disease-guidance-data-and-analysis
www.gov.uk/government/collections/pneumococcal-disease-guidance-data-and-analysis
Pneumococcal disease infections caused by serotypes not in Prevenar 13 vaccine
Dosage and schedule
PCV13 contains polysaccharide from thirteen common capsular types 1, 3, 4, 5, 6A, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, 23F. These are conjugated to protein (CRM197).For infants under one year of age: first dose at eight weeks of age, second at 16 weeks of age (at least two months after the first dose), third dose after their first birthday (at least 2 months after the last PCV13 dose)
Unimmunised or partially immunised children aged one year and up to two years of age: a single dose of PCV13
PPV23contains purified capsular polysaccharide from each of 23 capsular types of pneumococcus (PPV23) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6B, 7F, 8, 9N, 9V, 10A, 11A, 12F, 14, 15B, 17F, 18C, 19F, 19A, 20, 22F, 23F, 33FAdults over 65 years and at-risk groups aged two years or over: a single dose of PPV23
PCV10 Not currently recommended in the UK National Immunisation Programme.
Involve your Clinical Audit Department in 2018 BTS CAP Audit (www.brit-thoracic.org.uk)
Thank you