Communication and Cortex The computational neuroethology of mouse vocalizations Robert Liu...
-
Upload
marylou-warren -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Communication and Cortex The computational neuroethology of mouse vocalizations Robert Liu...
Communicationand Cortex
The computationalneuroethology of mouse vocalizations
Robert LiuSloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology
University of California at San Francisco
Basic questions in neural coding
• How does the brain process behaviorally-relevant stimuli?
• Is the structure of natural stimuli “efficiently” represented by neurons?
Computational neuroethology
• Study organism in natural contexts (etho-) Look for strong stimulus-behavior links What are the properties of the stimulus?
• Determine relevant neural areas (neuro-) How do neurons represent stimulus properties?
• Use behavior to constrain neural codes• Study coding algorithms (compu-)
Use info theory to probe efficiency of neural codes
Auditory processing in mice
• Obvious behavioral context: communication Vocalizations are natural input to auditory
system Behavioral response provides an observable
output
Auditory processing in mice
• Obvious behavioral context: communication Vocalizations are natural input to auditory
system Behavioral response provides an observable
output
• Why the mouse? Opportunities to employ genetic techniques Extensive research on peripheral and non-
cortical central auditory system Rich ultrasound communication behaviors
• Pup isolation calls maternal retrieval
Mouse pup ultrasounds
Time (ms)0 200 400 600
25
10025
10025
100
Fre
quen
cy (
kHz)
QuickTime™ and a Motion JPEG B decompressor are needed to see this picture.
• Spectral domain Categorical perception of bandwidth-limited
ultrasound noise as pup-like (Ehret & Haack, 1982)
Categorical perception of pup calls
Time (ms)0 40 80 120
30
90
Fre
quen
cy (
kHz)
60
Noise model
• Spectral domain Categorical perception of bandwidth-limited
ultrasound noise as pup-like (Ehret & Haack, 1982)
Categorical perception of pup calls
Time (ms)0 40 80 120
30
90
Fre
quen
cy (
kHz)
60
BW (kHz)22.5
Res
pons
eNoise modelPup-like
Adult mouse encounter calls
• Ultrasounds when males encounter females
Time (ms)0 200 400 600
25
10025
10025
100
Fre
quen
cy (
kHz)
QuickTime™ and a Motion JPEG A decompressor are needed to see this picture.
Computational neuroethology
• Study organism in natural contexts (etho-) Look for strong stimulus-behavior links What are the properties of the stimulus?
• Determine relevant neural areas (neuro-) How do neurons represent stimulus properties?
• Use behavior to constrain neural codes• Study coding algorithms (compu-)
Use info theory to probe efficiency of neural codes
• What frequencies make up a call?
One frequency extractedas a function of time
Frequency content of natural calls
Time (ms)
0 40 80
Number of 1 ms bins
0 20 4025
100
Fre
quen
cy (
kHz)
50
75
Spectrogram Histogram
25
100
Fre
quen
cy (
kHz)
50
75
Whistle-likesimplicity
Typical frequency (kHz)40 60 80 100
50
0
Dur
atio
n (
ms)
150
100
Pup call frequencies and durations
• Frequency and duration clusters Main: 67 kHz/59
ms Aux: 93 kHz/30 ms
Typical frequency (kHz)40 60 80 100
50
0
Dur
atio
n (
ms)
150
100
Pup call frequencies and durations
• Frequency and duration clusters Main: 67 kHz/59
ms Aux: 93 kHz/30 ms
• Main cluster <22.5 kHz bandwidth for categorization Natural distribution
contributes to category formation?
Natural acoustic categories
Typical frequency (kHz)40 60 80 100
50
0
Dur
atio
n (
ms)
150
100
• Adt: 80 kHz/23 ms• Pup and adult calls
clearly separate ROC: 91% correct
• Adult call category to be distinguished from pup calls?
• Perhaps other cues also necessary to categorize
Call repetition periods
• Periods between call onsets different
0 100 200 300 400 50025
600
100
Time (ms)
Fre
q (k
Hz)
25
100
Pup
Adt
Call repetition periods
• Periods between call onsets different
• Adult calls repeat more quickly than pup calls 100 ms vs. 180 ms ROC: 97% correct
(frequency, duration, and period)
Repetition period (ms)0 100 200 300 400 500
5
0
Pro
babi
lity
(1/s
)
10
0 100 200 300 400 50025
600
100
Time (ms)
Fre
q (k
Hz)
25
100
Pup
Adt
Conclusions
• Study organism in natural contexts (etho-) What are the properties of the natural calls?
• Spectral and temporal clustering of pup and adult calls
• Determine relevant neural areas (neuro-) How do neurons represent vocalization
properties?• Stimulus-locked neural oscillations reflect pup call
periods
• Use behavior to constrain neural codes The peak spike count in auditory cortex may
support a categorical distinction
Collaborators
Jennifer Linden
Michael MerzenichKenneth Miller
Christoph Schreiner
Mentors
Electrophysiology
• Experiments on recent CBA/CaJ mothers Ketamine and medetomidine anesthesia Multiunit activity recorded via tungsten
electrodes inserted 400-600 microns below the surface
Targeted areas with ultrasound responses Two free field speakers (low frequency range
from 3 kHz to 40 kHz; high frequency range from 20 kHz to 100 kHz)
TDT System II equipment used to play out stimuli and record responses