Comms presentation[1]
description
Transcript of Comms presentation[1]
ON 28 APRIL, 1992NO ONE REALLY CARED ABOUT
COMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY
RODNEY KING RIOTS, LOS ANGELES, CA 4/29/1992
ON 10 SEPTEMBER, 2001NO ONE REALLY CARED
ABOUTCOMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY
WORLD TRADE CENTER, NYC, 9/11/2001
ON 24 DECEMBER, 2004NO ONE REALLY CARED
ABOUTCOMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY
MEGA-TSUNAMI, INDONESIA 12/26/2004
ON 28 AUGUST, 2005NO ONE REALLY CARED
ABOUTCOMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY
HURRICANE KATRINA, NEW ORLEANS, LA 8/29/2005
ON 26 NOVEMBER, 2008NO ONE REALLY CARED
ABOUTCOMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY
TERRORIST ATTACKS, MUMBAI, INDIA 11/27/2008
ON 11 JANUARY, 2010NO ONE REALLY CARED ABOUT
COMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY
7.0 MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKE, HAITI, 1/12/2010
IN EACH OF THESE INCIDENTS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS
FAILED THE FIRST RESPONDERS
Why?
D. M. McGaughey, CPP, CAS, CI Special Agent (Ret.) [email protected]
INTEROPERABILITY AND COMPATIBILITY OF FIRST
RESPONDER COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS FAILED
DHS, 2/2009
THE FOLKS ON THE SCENE COULDN’T TALK TO EACH OTHER
D. M. McGaughey, CPP, CAS, CI Special Agent (Ret.) [email protected]
The vast majority of emergency responders are limited in their ability to communicate and collaborate with each other. They are unable to communicate with command, support teams and other responding organizations present at an incident scene. In 2008, almost 7 years after the tragic lessons learned by 9/11, the majority of emergency response organizations (ERO) do not have the basic capability for any of their team members to establish communications at an incident site. They may have to wait hours for large trucks and/or trailers with very expensive and complicated communications equipment delivered to the site. In the case of a catastrophic incident causing a scorched earth environment, it may take days to get the necessary equipment and communication support personnel to the incident site.
National Emergency Response Interoperability Framework and Resilient Communication System of Systems, DHS, 2/2009
It is not only the complexity and cost of existing systems that inhibit NIMS compliance; most systems often render previous technology investments obsolete or require a need for costly upgrades to legacy systems proving impractical or unaffordable.
DHS, FEB 2009
WRONG!
THESE GUYS JUST HAVEN’T THOUGHT “INSIDE THE BOX”
D. M. McGaughey, CPP, CAS, CI Special Agent (Ret.) [email protected]
SO - -HOW DO WE FIX THIS?
D. M. McGaughey, CPP, CAS, CI Special Agent (Ret.) [email protected]
WE FIX THIS BY GOING TO THE
COMMON DENOMINATOR OF THE FIRST RESPONDER
TEAM
The Hand-Held Radio – “the Brick”
D. M. McGaughey, CPP, CAS, CI Special Agent (Ret.) [email protected]
USING THE FIRST RESPONDER’S RADIO
FREQUENCY - WE SIMPLY KEY EVERY OTHER
COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE TO IT
AND BINGO – YOU HAVE INTEROPERABILITY
IT REALLY IS THAT SIMPLE
D. M. McGaughey, CPP, CAS, CI Special Agent (Ret.) [email protected]
• 700 MHz• 800 MHz• 900 MHz
• UHF/VHF• PTT/iDEN• P25/Tetra
Input data files are fully documented and NIMS/ICS compliant
PTT
Analog Phone
Video
Text
Data
Digital Phone
COMMUNICATIONSINTEROPERABILITY
NO NEW EQUIPMENT REQUIRED
NO UPGRADE EQUIPMENT REQUIRED
ANY MAKE, MODEL, MANUFACTURER OR FREQUENCY
VOICE, DATA, VIDEO INTEGRATIOND. M. McGaughey, CPP, CAS, CI Special Agent (Ret.) [email protected]
ENCRYPTION AND SECURITY
2,048 BIT, FIPS COMPLIANT ENCRYPTION
D. M. McGaughey, CPP, CAS, CI Special Agent (Ret.) [email protected]
SCALEABILITY & SIMPLICITY
STACKABLE GATEWAYS 4 ADAPTORS/GATEWAYUNLIMITED LOCATIONS LOCAL COUNTY STATE NATIONAL GLOBALMULTIPLE HOSTS NATIONAL INTERNATIONAL
ANY DEVICE
ANY ACCESS
ANY NETWORK
ANY CONTROL
D. M. McGaughey, CPP, CAS, CI Special Agent (Ret.) [email protected]
IT REALLY IS SIMPLE - -
COMMUNICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY
ONCE YOU START THINKING “INSIDE THE BOX”
D. M. McGaughey, CPP, CAS, CI Special Agent (Ret.) [email protected]