Common Sense By: Thomas Paine Group 1: Matt Fidurko, Katie Lyter, Kristin Youngs, Megan Burgess,...
-
Upload
joan-beard -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of Common Sense By: Thomas Paine Group 1: Matt Fidurko, Katie Lyter, Kristin Youngs, Megan Burgess,...
Common Sense By: Thomas Paine
Group 1:Matt Fidurko, Katie Lyter, Kristin Youngs, Megan Burgess, Davey Carls, Alex Anzivine
Society vs. Government
• “Society is produced by our wants and government by our wickedness”
• Society promotes our happiness POSITIVELY
• Government restrains our behavior NEGATIVELY
• “The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.”
• Society is great, but Government restricts
“Government is a necessary evil”
• Government restricts Society and forces us to give up freedoms
• It can be destructive and evil• Society and Government must have
a PEACEFUL CO-EXISTENCE • Ensures the SECURITY of the people
We Need Government!
• TO GOVERN • ENSURE FREEDOM• SECURITY• HELP SOCIETY WITH MORAL VALUES
Direct Democracy turns into a Republic
• Colonies get TOO BIG TO ASSEMBLE – Forcing people to get elected and
represent “THE WHOLE”• General mix won’t KEEP THEIR OWN OPINIONS
• Common change of the elected will lead to the whole community happy
Advantages of Absolute Government
• Simple type of Government• People would know:
– WHO IS IN CHARGE– WHO IS CAUSING THE SUFFERING – SUFFRAGE COULD MOST LIKELY BE
CURED
Complexity of British Government
• Society may suffer for a long time without anyone actually knowing the cause
• The British Government is divided between:– Monarchial Tyranny of the King– Aristocratical Tyranny of the Peers– The Commons
Checks and Balances,“absurd”
• Commons are supposed to be wiser and can check the King
• King also has power to check the commons by rejecting their bills
• THEY CONTRADICT THEMSELVES!
• “HOW CAME THE KING BY A POWER WHICH THE PEOPLE ARE AFRAID TO TRUST, AND ALWAYS OBLIGED TO CHECK? Such a power could not be the gift of wise people , neither can any power, WHICH NEEDS CHECKING, be from God: yet the provision which the constitution makes supposes such a power to exist.”
• Constitution requires us to have a “King”
• King is DISTRUSTED and receives checking from society
• NO ABSOLUTE MONARCHY IN AMERICA!
• “by the will of the king is as much the law of the land in Britain as in France, with this difference, that instead of proceeding directly from his mouth, it is handed to the people under the formidable shape of an act of parliament. For the fate of Charles The First, hath only made kings more subtle- not more just.”
• Form of government similar to an Absolute Monarchy
• Looked at more subtle because it seems the people now approve it
• “The prejudice of Englishmen, in favour of their own government, by King, Lords and Commons, arises as much or more from national pride than reason.”• Prejudice of the Englishmen comes from the pride of their nation, rather than coming with reason
Mankind is equal in the order of creation Thomas Paine states “ Equality could only be destroyed
by subsequent circumstance...”
Paine refers to the pages of the Bible Not a Christian, uses the passages of Samuel People trusted faith and religion before the
Enlightenment He uses the Bible to express his point so that people
understand
Enlightenment and the Bible
COMMON SENSE BY THOMAS PAINE:OF MONARCHY AND HEREDITARY SUCCESSION
Monarchies and God
God disapproves of monarchy- monarchies give too much power to one person- misfortune is brought onto the subjects under the King’s rule
A republic is affective - protects citizens from unfair rule- ex. Jewish community first had a republic, but the citizens wanted monarchy
Samuel, the Mediator
Samuel is a mediator between God and the people God suggests a king is destructive of libertyGod is the only one who can judge his people
The people added on to their sins
“Popery of Government”
Paine refers to monarchy as “Popery of Government”“Popery of Government”- heads of governmentPope is head of Roman Catholic ChurchKing/Queen are heads of government
King- head of governmentPope- Head
of Roman Catholic Church
Hereditary Monarchy
Paine thinks hereditary monarchy is absurdNot all descents are worthy of complete power
Ex. Rehoboam – fostered dangerous principles- Inaugurated taxes and levies
No one by birth should have the right to ruleHonors, intelligence, sincerity, and equality“ASS FOR A LION”
Hereditary Monarchy and England
First established based on traditionPeople didn’t want to change
Superstition
Monarchy in EnglandNot “natural”William the Conqueror
Named himself king
William the Conqueror
First Chosen Kings
Precedents that exclude successionKings chosen by lotChosen by electionChosen by usurpation
English monarchy Didn’t chose king in the previous ways
Hereditary = Bad Monarchies
Hereditary Monarchy Kings chosen by genetics Succession
Bad Rulers vs. Good Rulers Unworthy and unfair kings Kings being born into power
Reasons and Ridiculousness
Plausible- stopping civil wars Eight civil wars
First Civil War (1642-1646)Second Civil War (1647-1649)Third Civil War (1649-1651)
Nineteen rebellions
England’s ConstitutionGlory of the Constitution
House of CommonsPoison of the Constitution
Crown
Works Cited
Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. Part II, Of Monarchy and Hereditary Succession. Print.
Images:Googleimages.com
Kendra Antle, Kate Cecchi, Abbey Jones, Robby Higby, Dom Saglimben, Katelyn WoodsPeriod 7 J.C.C. History Mr. Roh
Common Sense: Of Monarchy and Hereditary Succession
Madison Moran, Kellie Smith, Shelby Grimmer
• Paine thought all men are equal
– No matter rich or poor
Enlightenment Theories
• Uses them to make his point
• Majority of the audience Christian
– Show that it goes against god. (sin)
Christian References
• It is a sin to idolize anything/anyone other than god.
• God says “kings equal people being enslaved, cook and bakers, instruments of
war.”
• Kings will take the benefits of the people
• People still wanted a monarchy
• When people realize how hard it is god will not hear their prayers.
Why God disapproves
• PEOPLE CONTRADICT THEMSELVES!
• Popery= pope having total control• People did not like pope having total
control.
• Yet people wanted monarchy• King= having total control of government
“Popery of government”
• You never know what you’re going to get
• Taking away the rights of future generations
Absurdity of hereditary monarchies
• Most likely from a savage tribe choosing the head of their group (Lord of the Flies)
• Having sons lead was “convenient”
• After a few generation it became traditional
How It Started
• All men are born with equal rights. No birth should be any more important.
• Adam chose to disobey god, it affected his children
• Adam= hereditary succession
“It’s just not natural!’
• Choosing by lot= random king
• Most likely will not have good leadership skills
• Could be a “couch potato”
Kings chosen by lot
• The people vote for the king
• Hereditary succession= children won’t be as qualified as voted leader
Kings chosen by election
• William the Conqueror
• Take over by force; makes themselves leader
• No right to power= descendents have no right to power
Kings by usurpation
• Royal children= spoiled brats
• Don’t empathize with their people= leads to making wrong decisions
• Foolish, evil, wrong leaders
Born Naive
• Monarchies are supposed to prevent civil wars
• If this was true it would be one good thing about monarchies
• BUT England's has a history of 8 civil war and 19 rebellions under monarchies
• King= make peace but are distracted by themselves
• If a king has more than 1 son= bloody battle for crown
Monarchies prevents civil wars… Pssshhtt, yeah right.
• Common people in England thought they had a say in government= House of
Commons
• King held the true power and bribed members of the House of Commons
• To say England is a “Republic” is a greatly inaccurate statement
• Kings= impoverished nations and wars
The “Glory” of the Constitution
By Thomas Paine
Part IV
Annie McHone Melanie Hudson, Ryan Vossler, Lexie Zimmer, Josh Greaves, Andrew Stady
“Small islands not capable of protecting themselves are the proper objects for kingdoms to take under their care; but there is something
very absurd, in supposing a continent to be perpetually governed by an
island.”
- Typically, the empire with the strong central government protects the
weak.- In this case, Britain, an island, rules
over America, a huge continent.
Why does Paine refer to King George III as the
“Sullen tempered Pharaoh of England”?
- Ignores the pain he is causing because he believes he is all powerful.
- King angrily punishes colonies- Similar belief of the Egyptian Pharaohs.
Why is separation the only possible way forward?
- Move backward forever if American’s submit to British laws.
- Always be arguing over change that will never come.
- America is already greater than what the king wishes.
- Only way forward is to break away from the king.
Why is reconciliation not possible?
- Reuniting with British is foolish.- Bond between those in England, and those in
colonies is weak.- Grudges
- Tensions would carry on for centuries to come.
What does Paine propose is a major problem with
monarchies?
- Monarchies are always at war within themselves or other countries.
- Kings believe that their thoughts are correct.
- Kings don’t actually understand what goes on in their country.
What type of government does Paine propose would be best for
America?
- Paine wants a republican government.
- Laws passed through voting.
- Each colony would sent at least thirty delegates to one Congress.
- Laws must have three fifths of Congress to pass.
What does Paine mean when he declares that in America “LAW IS
KING”?- We did not focus on one leader.
- We focus on a set of written laws to rule us.
Why does Paine believe that his understanding of the nature of government is a product of the
Enlightenment?
- Paine believes in natural rights.- Paine believes that government should be ruled by people
and a set of laws, not a divine ruler.- Paine states that all people have liberties.
Who is the “fugitive” Paine speaks of?
- The fugitive is freedom.- No one has yet found freedom.
Who must receive the fugitive?
- All countries must receive the fugitive.- If everyone can receive freedom then they can achieve
world peace.