COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

37
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW JULY 25, 2012 Mr. Tony Cook Mrs. Andrea Patterson

description

COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW. JULY 25, 2012 Mr. Tony Cook Mrs. Andrea Patterson. What is the CCSS Initiative?. An initiative of the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Page 1: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

COMMON CORE STATE

STANDARDS OVERVIEW

JULY 25, 2012Mr. Tony Cook

Mrs. Andrea Patterson

Page 2: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

What is the CCSS Initiative?

An initiative of the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers

A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in mathematics and English language arts

Single largest enterprise wide initiative ever undertaken in American K-12 schools

Largest change in classroom expectations ever

Page 3: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

What are the CCSS? Aligned with college and work

expectations Rigorous content requiring higher-order

thinking and application of knowledge Internationally benchmarked Evidence-and/or research-based

Page 4: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Rationale for CCSS Provides consistency across states Prepares students to compete globally Allows for more focused professional

development Allows for the development of a

common assessment Provides the opportunity to compare

and evaluate policies that affect student achievement across states

US K-12 students have fallen to the middle of the pack in global education rankings

Page 5: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Implementation Timeline

2011-2012 Grades K-22012-2013 Grades 3-82013-2014 Grades 9-122014-2015 Live

Assessments

Page 6: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

How Will Instruction Change?

Increase in rigor and relevance Emphasis on higher order thinking skills Move toward performance-based

learning opportunities More emphasis on research and writing Increased use of technology to present

products

Page 7: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

SCHOOLS DO NOT HAVE SUBSTANTIAL EXPERIENCE WITH ENTERPRISE

CHANGE Common Core Standards require

significant change for every teacher. Common Core Standards require

significant change for every principal. Common Core Standards require

immediate action even though implementation is over time.

Page 8: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

English Language Arts Shifts

Balancing informational text and literary text

Building knowledge in the disciplines Focusing on text complexity and what

students read Requiring text-based answers Writing about sources (evidence) Stressing academic and domain-specific

vocabulary

Page 9: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Percentage Distribution of Literary and Informational

PassagesGrade Literary Informational

4th 50 508 45 5512 30 70

Page 10: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Informational Text

Much of our knowledge base comes from informational text.

Informational text makes up vast majority of required reading in college and the workplace (80%).

Informational text is harder for students to comprehend than narrative text.

Students are asked to read very little of informational text in elementary and middle school (7-15%).

Utilize a balanced literacy approach (reader’s workshop, writer’s workshop, literature circles).

Page 11: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Evidence Based Reading and Writing

Most college and workplace writing is evidence-based and expository in nature.

The standards in writing ask students to respond to evidence-based writing prompts (inform/argue).

The standards in reading require students to respond to text-dependent questions with evidence-based claims.

Rich and rigorous conversations are dependent on a common text.

Students develop habits for crafting arguments in conversation and in writing.

Evaluate others use of evidence.

Page 12: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

MAJOR SHIFT: TEXT-DEPENDENT QUESTIONS

Far longer amounts of classroom time spent on text worth reading and rereading carefully

Base answers on what has been read, not on opinions or experience

Recent study found that 80% of the questions students were asked when they were reading are answerable without direct reference to the text being read.

Page 13: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

ARGUMENTS CONTAIN A general topic or main contention CLAIMS or elaborations on the topic EVIDENCE for the claims made EXPLANATION of HOW evidence

SUPPORTS the claims Anticipated response (pro or con)

Page 14: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

To Argue…and Inform…in Writing CCSS Requires

Argument/Evidence-Based Writing

Grade To Persuade

To Explain To Convey Experience

4 30% 35% 35%8 35% 35% 30%12 40% 40% 20%

Page 15: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Complex Text The gap between complexity of college and

high school texts is huge! The Common Core Standards include a

staircase of increasing text complexity from elementary through high school

The Common Core Standards focus on building vocabulary that is shared across many types of complex texts and many content areas

Teachers need to be patient. Create more time and space in curriculum for close and careful reading of complex text.

Expose students to text that is more complex than their reading level suggests.

Page 16: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Lexile BandsGrade Band Current Lexile

Band“Stretch” Lexile

BandK-1 N/A N/A2-3 450L-725L 420L-820L4-5 645L-845L 740L-1010L6-8 860L-1010L 925L-1185L9-10 960L-1115L 1050L-1335L11-CCR 1070L-1220L 1185L-1385L

Page 17: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

ACT Study- Schmeiser, 2006 Students who were Unprepared in

READING had a 1% chance of later success in science and 15% chance of success in math

Students who were Prepared in READING had a 32% chance of later success in science and 67% chance of later success in math

Page 18: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Acquiring Vocabulary Three tiers of words are vital for

comprehension and vocabulary development.

Tier 1-everyday speechTier 2-general academic wordsTier 3-domain-specific words

Page 19: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

KINDERGARTEN ESSENTIAL

VOCABULARY IN CCSSELA MATH Stanza Attribute Preference Decompose Punctuation

Decomposition Collaborate Composition

Illustrator Hexagon Brainstorm Dimensional Non-fiction Vertices

Page 20: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Math Shifts

Focus on key topics at each grade level Coherent progressions across grade

levels Fluency Deep understanding Applications Mathematical practices that foster

reasoning, modeling, and sense-making

Page 21: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Focus Focus strongly where the standards

focus! Significantly narrow the scope of

content and deepen how time and energy is spent in the math classroom.

Focus deeply only on what is emphasized in the standards, so that students gain strong foundations.

Page 22: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Coherence Think across grades, and link to major

topics. Carefully connect the learning within and

across grades so that students can build new understanding onto foundations built in previous years.

Begin to count on solid conceptual understanding of core content and then build on it. Each standard is not a new event, but an extension of previous learning.

Page 23: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Standards for Mathematical Practice

Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them

Reason abstractly and quantitatively Construct viable arguments and critique the

reasoning of others Model with mathematics Use appropriate tools strategically Attend to precision Look for and make use of structure Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning

Page 24: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Math PrioritiesGrade Priorities in Support of

Rich Instruction and Expectations of Fluency

and Conceptual Understanding

K-2 Addition and subtraction, measurement using whole number quantities

3-5 Multiplication and division of whole numbers and fractions

6 Ratios and proportional reasoning; early expressions and equations

7 Ratios and proportional reasoning; arithmetic of rational numbers

8 Linear algebra

Page 25: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

STANDARDS FOR MATHEMATICAL PRACTICE IN

A CLASSROOMMcDonald’s Claim

Wikipedia reports that 8% of all Americans eat at McDonald’s every day. In the US, there are approximately 310 million Americans and 12,800 McDonald’s. The average McDonald’s store can serve 1,500 people per day.

Do you believe the Wikipedia report to be true? Create a mathematical argument to justify your position.

Page 26: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

PARCC

Mississippi is a governing state in the PARCC consortium; as such, Mississippi will be on the governing board that makes decisions about the assessment design and development.

The assessment design was revised in June 2011.

Page 27: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Two Components of the Summative Assessment

Performance Assessment Given primarily on the computer; composed primarily of performance tasks with emphasis on hard-to- measure standards Results will be returned in 2 weeks This assessment will be given 75% into the school year.

End of Year Assessment Given on computer with multiple item types Scored entirely by computer for fast results

*These two assessments will be combined for an overall score.

Page 28: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

The Performance Assessment

Over several class periods students will complete a project-like task that draws on a range of skills.

ELA tasks will focus on writing effectively when analyzing texts, using evidence from the texts to support claims.

Math tasks will require students to apply key mathematical skills, concepts, and processes to solve complex problems of the types encountered in everyday life, work, and decision-making

Page 29: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

The End-of-Year Assessment

This assessment will consist of a range of item types including innovative technology-enhanced items to sample the full set of grade-level standards.

Expect to see multiple choice items, open ended questions, etc.

Page 30: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Speaking/Listening Assessment

There will be a speaking/listening assessment. Teachers will score this assessment using a rubric. This will not be used for accountability.

Scores may be used within students’ grades.

Page 31: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Optional Formative Assessments

There are two formative assessments that districts may choose to administer. These will not count towards accountability.

The first assessment would be given at the beginning of the year, and the second assessment would be administered at the middle of the year.

Page 32: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

What Can We Start Doing Now?

Become familiar with the new Lexile framework

Fill classrooms with informative and nonfiction texts

Ask students to write to explain their answers

Incorporate open ended questions Integrate the math practices in your lessons Provide speaking/listening opportunities for

students

Page 33: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Classroom Libraries Build your classroom libraries! Fill your library with a variety of genres.

Organize baskets by genre, author, or series.

Make sure there are a variety of levels within each basket.

Page 34: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

MCT 2 AssessmentThe following test item is from the reading portion of a grade 6 MCT 2 language arts practice test.

The word daunting is used in lines 3 and 31 of the poem.Based upon the context clues, what does daunting mean?A.  Clever and tricky B.  Final and endlessC.  Surprising and shockingD.  Threatening and frightening

Page 35: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

Common Core Assessment

The following is an example of what an item from the Common Core assessment might look like.

The poet uses the word daunting several times in his poem. Using the context clues in the poem, what do you think the word daunting means, and why did the author choose to use the word daunting to express his feelings about the new school? Be sure to explain your answer and cite evidence from the poem.

Page 36: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

A KEY FEAR TO ADDRESS

As much as we fear the NEW…We fear giving up the OLD

even more!

Page 37: COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW

CCSS Resources www.achievethecore.org

http://parcconlineorg/parcc-content-frameworks

www.pta.org/4446.htm

www.corestandards.org

www.mde.k12.ms.us (go to Hot Topics)