Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of...

17
Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth

Transcript of Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of...

Page 1: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

Committee review of Executive decisions:

Rubber stamp or game changer?

2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference

4 October 2013, Perth

Page 2: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

Cronulla Fisheries Centre

Page 3: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

Protests against Cronulla closure

Page 4: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

‘The Committee has concluded that the decision to close the Cronulla Fisheries Research Centre of Excellence was imprudent and devoid of the transparency and accountability required of major government decisions. Therefore, this decision should be reversed in the public interest …’

Committee Chair, Revd Fred Nile, Hansard, 23 October 2012.

Cronulla Fisheries Inquiry: Findings

Page 5: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

Media coverage of Cronulla Fisheries Inquiry

Page 6: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

Prisons Committee

Page 7: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

Protests against Grafton closure

Page 8: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

‘The Committee found that, notwithstanding the failures in the process, the reasons upon which Corrective Services NSW based its decisions to downsize or close facilities are justified.’

Committee Chair, Paul Green, Media Release, 14 June 2013.

Prisons Inquiry: Findings

Page 9: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

Media coverage of Prisons Inquiry

Page 10: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

Three potential benefits of inquiry process

2. Capacity to improve future decision-making3. Hold the Executive to account

1. Scrutinise questionable decisions – ‘shine light into dark corners’

Page 11: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

1st: Shine light into dark corners

Three benefits of inquiry process

Page 12: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

The Hon. CATE FAEHRMANN: Minister, I assume you have tabled the cost benefit analysis into the closure now… Why was the cost benefit analysis not tabled with the questions on notice that we received this morning from the department with hundreds and hundreds of documents? My toner cartridge ran out trying to print it all off ...Mr PATERSON: Because it was not concluded.The Hon. STEVE WHAN: It was completed today, was it?Mr PATERSON: Yes.The Hon. CATE FAEHRMANN: You completed it today?Mr PATERSON: We did.The Hon. CATE FAEHRMANN: We received the questions on notice this morning. The cost benefit analysis into this decision was completed today by your department?Mr PATERSON: Yes.

Questions on the cost benefit analysis

Page 13: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

2nd:Improve future decision- making

Benefits of inquiry process

Decision making process

Page 14: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

Decentralisation policy

Page 15: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

3rd:Reinforce Executive accountability to Parliament

Benefits of inquiry process

Page 16: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

‘When I am invited by upper house inquiries I go. I expect my ministers to go.’

Premier Barry O’Farrell, Radio 2GB, August 2012.

What the Premier had to say…

Page 17: Committee review of Executive decisions: Rubber stamp or game changer? 2013 Australasian Study of Parliament Group Conference 4 October 2013, Perth.

Committee review of Executive decisions …

Rubber stamp or game changer?

Conclusion