Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence Administrative Services Credential...
-
Upload
maurice-armstrong -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence Administrative Services Credential...
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Administrative Administrative Services CredentialServices Credential
Public Information ForumPublic Information Forum
June 8, 2011June 8, 2011
11
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Meeting Start UpMeeting Start Up
Welcome and IntroductionsWelcome and Introductions
Logistical InformationLogistical Information
Agenda ReviewAgenda Review
22
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Topics and Colored CardsTopics and Colored Cards
Pre-Program requirements--Pre-Program requirements--BLUEBLUE Preliminary Credential routes--Preliminary Credential routes--
GREENGREEN Clear Credential routes--Clear Credential routes--YELLOWYELLOW Renewal options--Renewal options--PINKPINK Other—WHITEOther—WHITE
33
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
A Little History: THE CHARGEA Little History: THE CHARGE
The major purpose of this study is The major purpose of this study is to review to review the the content, structure content, structure and requirementsand requirements for administrator for administrator preparation to ensure that these preparation to ensure that these remain appropriate to the needs of remain appropriate to the needs of administrators serving in California administrators serving in California schools. schools.
44
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
THE CHARGETHE CHARGE An additional consideration for the An additional consideration for the
proposed study will be proposed study will be to determine to determine whether or not whether or not a single a single administrative credential administrative credential authorizing authorizing all types of administrative service is all types of administrative service is still an appropriate model to meet still an appropriate model to meet the complexity of the demands and the complexity of the demands and expectations of administrators at this expectations of administrators at this time in California. time in California.
55
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
THE CHARGETHE CHARGE
Further, the study should also Further, the study should also provide recommendations provide recommendations concerning concerning how to effectively identify how to effectively identify administratorsadministrators who would be adept who would be adept in providing instructional leadership in providing instructional leadership and be able to effectively and be able to effectively lead lead transformational changetransformational change within within California schools.California schools.
66
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
THE CHARGETHE CHARGE
Another important consideration Another important consideration would be would be to look to look at the range of at the range of role role expectations expectations for administrators and for administrators and determinedetermine if these expectations can if these expectations can be met by be met by a single individuala single individual, , regardless of the credentialing regardless of the credentialing structure. structure.
77
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
THE CHARGETHE CHARGE
Other considerations for the study Other considerations for the study would be would be to identify to identify who should who should prepare administratorsprepare administrators for California for California schools and schools and which aspects which aspects of of administrator preparation should be administrator preparation should be required during pre-service required during pre-service and and which should be which should be required during required during the the administrator’s administrator’s beginning years of beginning years of serviceservice. .
88
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
A Little HistoryA Little History The Panel
– 23 members– 8 Institutional representatives– 11 K-12 and 10 IHE, 1 researcher, 1 CASBO– 8 males and 15 females
The Meetings– 6 meetings, covering 11 days– Activities
Research Reading Collegial input outside meetings Investigations Conferred with other states Discussions within panel Consulted national leaders
99
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
LEARNING TO LEAD SYSTEM LEARNING TO LEAD SYSTEM (LTLS)(LTLS)
From the Learning to Teach System (LTTS) to the…From the Learning to Teach System (LTTS) to the…
1010
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Preliminary Credential Preparation
Preliminary Credential Preparation
Clear Credential Preparation
Clear Credential Preparation
Credential RenewalCredential Renewal
Blended Program• Subject Matter Preparation•Preliminary Preparation•Support and Supervision•Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA)
Post-Baccalaureate Program• Subject Matter Preparation• Preliminary Preparation• Support and Supervision• Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA)
Intern Program•Subject Matter Preparation•Preliminary Preparation•Support and Supervision•Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA)
A Clear Credential is valid for the life of the holder as long as renewal fees and evidence of meeting professional fitness are submitted every 5 years.
Professional growth and successful service verification are not required for credential renewal. School districts are directed to encourage teachers to participate in professional growth activities at the local level.
SYSTEM QUALITIESSYSTEM QUALITIES
ALIGNMENT•State-Adopted Academic Content and Performance Standards for Students•Teaching Performance Expectations•California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP)
ALIGNMENT•State-Adopted Academic Content and Performance Standards for Students•Teaching Performance Expectations•California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP)
ACCOUNTABILITY•Candidate Assessment•Credential and Induction Program Approval/Accreditation•Participant Completion of Approved Induction Program
ACCOUNTABILITY•Candidate Assessment•Credential and Induction Program Approval/Accreditation•Participant Completion of Approved Induction Program
COLLABORATION•Schools/ Universities•State Agencies•BTSA Induction Programs•Practitioner Teamwork
COLLABORATION•Schools/ Universities•State Agencies•BTSA Induction Programs•Practitioner Teamwork
OPTIONS•Entry Routes Including Paraprofessional Program• Subject-Matter Requirement •Community College Early Preparation
OPTIONS•Entry Routes Including Paraprofessional Program• Subject-Matter Requirement •Community College Early Preparation
Paraprofessional Teacher Training Program (PTTP)Paid TuitionSupport NetworkCareer Ladder
Paraprofessional Teacher Training Program (PTTP)Paid TuitionSupport NetworkCareer Ladder
PRELIMINARY
CLEAR
Induction Program*
Application of prior knowledge
Advanced Curriculum Demonstration
Formative Assessment and Support
Frequent Reflection on Practice
Individual Induction Plan (professional growth plan).
* If Induction is verified by an employer as unavailable, then a Clear Credential Program maybe completed to earn the Clear Teaching Credential
California’s Learning to Teach System
1111
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Preliminary Credential Preparation
Emphasis to prepare site administrators
Clear Credential PreparationEmployment required
Credential Renewal
Test-Only Option (CPACE)
•Based on CPSEL•Four Domains Examined•Various Structures Employed•Aligns with Competency at Completion for the Traditional Program
PRELIMINARY
CLEAR
Traditional Program
•Based on CPSEL•Coursework & field experiences•Assessment of Performance* (local options)
o Portfolioo Projecto Capstone assignment
•Evidence of Competency at Completion
Intern Program
•Based on CPSEL •Coursework and Field Experiences•Assessment of Performance (local option)
o Portfolioo Projecto Capstone assignment
•Evidence of Competency at Completion
A Clear Credential is valid for 5 years. Renewal is based upon application and fee. Professional growth beyond the clear is the responsibility of the employer.
Note: It is recommended that once a person secures a principal position, an additional year of mentoring/ support be provided
• Site-based, job-embedded experience supported by individualized mentoring/coaching as the prominent structure to build leadership capacity•Structured around CPSEL•Built upon the Evidence of Competency created by preliminary program sponsor and candidate •Uses an initial candidate assessment •Driven by the Individual Induction Plan which is informed by the Evidence of Competency & candidate assessment•Induction Plan may address current position or a position to which that the candidate aspires •Individual Induction Plan completed within __ days of program entrance by mentor, candidate, program sponsor, and employer•Application of prior knowledge (gained during the preliminary program)•Formative Assessment system (curriculum) addresses issues around student achievement, range of learners, etc. •Professional Development requirement (e.g. seminars, courses, online events, shadowing)•Frequent Reflection on Practice, individually & with mentor•Criteria of completion employed to determine exit criteria
Start within 12 months of employmentTwo years program duration
0-12 semester units of courseworkMultiple eligible program sponsors
Pre-Program Requirements
•3 Years Experience upon Completion
•Positive Evaluations •Acceptable Basic Credential
California’s Learning to Lead System
1212
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Preliminary Credential Preparation
Emphasis to prepare site administrators
Clear Credential PreparationEmployment required
Credential Renewal
Test-Only Option (CPACE)
•Based on CPSEL•Four Domains Examined•Various Structures Employed•Aligns with Competency at Completion for the Traditional Program
PRELIMINARY
CLEAR
Traditional Program
•Based on CPSEL•Coursework & field experiences•Assessment of Performance* (local options)
o Portfolioo Projecto Capstone assignment
•Evidence of Competency at Completion
Intern Program
•Based on CPSEL •Coursework and Field Experiences•Assessment of Performance (local option)
o Portfolioo Projecto Capstone assignment
•Evidence of Competency at Completion
A Clear Credential is valid for 5 years. Renewal is based upon application and fee. Professional growth beyond the clear is the responsibility of the employer.
Note: It is recommended that once a person secures a principal position, an additional year of mentoring/ support be provided
• Site-based, job-embedded experience supported by individualized mentoring/coaching as the prominent structure to build leadership capacity•Structured around CPSEL•Built upon the Evidence of Competency created by preliminary program sponsor and candidate •Uses an initial candidate assessment •Driven by the Individual Induction Plan which is informed by the Evidence of Competency & candidate assessment•Induction Plan may address current position or a position to which that the candidate aspires •Individual Induction Plan completed within __ days of program entrance by mentor, candidate, program sponsor, and employer•Application of prior knowledge (gained during the preliminary program)•Formative Assessment system (curriculum) addresses issues around student achievement, range of learners, etc. •Professional Development requirement (e.g. seminars, courses, online events, shadowing)•Frequent Reflection on Practice, individually & with mentor•Criteria of completion employed to determine exit criteria
Start within 12 months of employmentTwo years program duration
0-12 semester units of courseworkMultiple eligible program sponsors
Pre-Program Requirements
•3 Years Experience upon Completion
•Positive Evaluations •Acceptable Basic Credential
California’s Learning to Lead System
1313
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
California Professional Standards California Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (CPSEL)for Educational Leaders (CPSEL)
CPSEL Standard 1: Vision of Learning
CPSEL Standard 2: Student Learning and Professional Growth
CPSEL Standard 3: Organizational Management for Student Learning
CPSEL Standard 4: Working with Diverse Families and Communities
CPSEL Standard 5: Personal Ethics and Leadership Capacity
CPSEL Standard 6: Political, Social, Economic, Legal and Cultural Understanding
1414
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Set in JelloSet in Jello
1515
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Pre-Program RequirementsPre-Program Requirements
Experience
Evaluation
Credential
Experience tied to start of Experience tied to start of program vs. completion of program vs. completion of programprogram
Experience linked to Experience linked to preliminary or clear teaching preliminary or clear teaching credentialcredential
Evaluations from former or Evaluations from former or current position acceptablecurrent position acceptable
Various credentials Various credentials acceptable:acceptable:– TeachingTeaching– Pupil Personnel ServicesPupil Personnel Services– Health Services: School NursingHealth Services: School Nursing– Teacher Librarian ServicesTeacher Librarian Services– Designated Subjects: Adult EdDesignated Subjects: Adult Ed
1616
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Preliminary Credential Preliminary Credential PreparationPreparation
Traditional
Intern
Test-Only
•Emphasis on site administrator position
•Multiple pathwayso Test-onlyo Traditional Programo Intern
•All pathways address standards established by the CTC
1717
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Preliminary Credential Preliminary Credential PreparationPreparation
Based on CPSELBased on CPSEL Coursework & field experienceCoursework & field experience Assessment of PerformanceAssessment of Performance (local options)(local options)
o Portfolio/ProjectPortfolio/Projecto Capstone assignmentCapstone assignment
Evidence of Competency at Evidence of Competency at CompletionCompletionCertificate of Eligibility or Certificate of Eligibility or Preliminary Credential optionsPreliminary Credential options
Traditional
Intern
Test-Only
1818
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Preliminary Credential Preliminary Credential PreparationPreparation
California PreliminaryCalifornia Preliminary Administrative CredentialAdministrative Credential Examination (CPACE)Examination (CPACE) Based on CPSELBased on CPSEL
Four Domains ExaminedFour Domains Examined
Various Structures Various Structures EmployedEmployed
Aligns with Competency at Aligns with Competency at Completion for the Traditional Completion for the Traditional & Intern Programs& Intern Programs
http://www.cpace.nesinc.com/http://www.cpace.nesinc.com/
Traditional
Intern
Test-Only
1919
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Preparation ProgramClear Preparation Program Based upon what we Based upon what we
have learned from have learned from over a decade of over a decade of success in teacher success in teacher inductioninduction– General EducationGeneral Education– Special EducationSpecial Education
Conceptual model Conceptual model presented—details yet presented—details yet to be finalizedto be finalized
Employment required Employment required
• Site-based, job-embedded experience supported by individualized mentoring/coaching as the prominent structure to build leadership capacity
• Structured around CPSEL• Built upon the Evidence of Competency created by
preliminary program sponsor and candidate • Uses an initial candidate assessment • Driven by the Individual Induction Plan which is
informed by the Evidence of Competency & candidate assessment
• Induction Plan may address current position or a position to which that the candidate aspires
• Individual Induction Plan completed within __ days of program entrance by mentor, candidate, program sponsor, and employer
• Application of prior knowledge (gained during the preliminary program)
• Formative Assessment system (curriculum) addresses issues around student achievement, range of learners, etc.
• Professional Development requirement (e.g. seminars, courses, online events, shadowing)
• Frequent Reflection on Practice, individually & with mentor
• Criteria of completion employed to determine exit criteria
Start within 12 months of employment
Two years program duration0-12 semester units of courseworkMultiple eligible program sponsors
Five year, renewable credential
2020
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Structural ComponentsClear Structural Components
Participation coincides Participation coincides with initial job with initial job acquisitionacquisition
Program sponsor Program sponsor commits to two years commits to two years of mentoringof mentoring
College courses College courses maymay be included as PD, but be included as PD, but not requirednot required
A variety of entities A variety of entities eligible to sponsor a eligible to sponsor a clear programclear program
• Site-based, job-embedded experience supported by individualized mentoring/coaching as the prominent structure to build leadership capacity
• Structured around CPSEL• Built upon the Evidence of Competency created by
preliminary program sponsor and candidate • Uses an initial candidate assessment • Driven by the Individual Induction Plan which is informed
by the Evidence of Competency & candidate assessment• Induction Plan may address current position or a position
to which that the candidate aspires • Individual Induction Plan completed within __ days of
program entrance by mentor, candidate, program
Start within 12 months of employment
Two years program duration
0-12 semester units of coursework
Multiple eligible program sponsors
2121
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components
Moving the location of Moving the location of learning from the IHE learning from the IHE classroom to the job siteclassroom to the job site
What they do for their What they do for their job is also what earns job is also what earns the credentialthe credential
A veteran administrator A veteran administrator coaches to build a coaches to build a candidate’s leadership candidate’s leadership capacity capacity
• Site-based, job-embedded experience supported by individualized mentoring/coaching as the prominent structure to build leadership capacity
• Structured around CPSEL
• Built upon the Evidence of Competency created by preliminary program sponsor and candidate
• Uses an initial candidate assessment
2222
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components
The foundation remains The foundation remains the CPSEL the CPSEL – ContinuityContinuity
languagelanguage structurestructure ActivitiesActivities
– Capacity to measure Capacity to measure growthgrowth
• Site-based, job-embedded experience supported by individualized mentoring/coaching as the prominent structure to build leadership capacity
• Structured around CPSEL
• Built upon the Evidence of Competency created by preliminary program sponsor and candidate
• Uses an initial candidate assessment
2323
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components
Bridges the experiences Bridges the experiences done in the preliminary done in the preliminary program to the clear program to the clear programprogram
Acknowledges prior Acknowledges prior work, knowledge and work, knowledge and skillsskills
Allows a “build upon” or Allows a “build upon” or growth modelgrowth model
Grounded in evidenceGrounded in evidence
• Site-based, job-embedded experience supported by individualized mentoring/coaching as the prominent structure to build leadership capacity
• Structured around CPSEL
• Built upon the Evidence of Competency created by preliminary program sponsor and candidate
• Uses an initial candidate assessment
2424
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components Evidence-based Evidence-based
assessmentassessment Assessments from a Assessments from a
variety of stakeholders variety of stakeholders possiblepossible– Candidate self-Candidate self-
assessmentassessment– EmployerEmployer– Mentor/coachMentor/coach
Assessment done within Assessment done within ___ days of enrollment ___ days of enrollment in program (TBD)in program (TBD)
• Site-based, job-embedded experience supported by individualized mentoring/coaching as the prominent structure to build leadership capacity
• Structured around CPSEL
• Built upon the Evidence of Competency created by preliminary program sponsor and candidate
• Uses an initial candidate assessment
2525
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components
Evidence of Evidence of competency and initial competency and initial assessment(s) of assessment(s) of candidate provide candidate provide evidence for planevidence for plan
IIP is an action IIP is an action research modelresearch model
Plan is based uponPlan is based upon– Candidate-identified Candidate-identified
areas of growthareas of growth– Identified CPSEL Identified CPSEL
elementselements
• Driven by the Individual Induction Plan which is informed by the Evidence of Competency & candidate assessment
• Induction Plan may address current position or a position to which that the candidate aspires
• Individual Induction Plan completed within __ days of program entrance by mentor, candidate, program sponsor, and employer
• Application of prior knowledge (gained during the preliminary program)
2626
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components Many aspire to Many aspire to
become a site become a site principal, but often principal, but often the first step is the first step is assistant principalassistant principal– IIP may address the IIP may address the
job needs of an job needs of an assistant principalassistant principal
– IIP may address the IIP may address the job needs and skill job needs and skill sets of a site principalsets of a site principal
• Driven by the Individual Induction Plan which is informed by the Evidence of Competency & candidate assessment
• Induction Plan may address current position or a position to which that the candidate aspires
• Individual Induction Plan completed within __ days of program entrance by mentor, candidate, program sponsor, and employer
• Application of prior knowledge (gained during the preliminary program)
2727
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components Panel is still discussing Panel is still discussing
options regarding how options regarding how soon a candidate must soon a candidate must write the IIPwrite the IIP
The IIP is a The IIP is a collaborative effort collaborative effort with input from many with input from many different stakeholders, different stakeholders, all of whom have a all of whom have a vested interested in vested interested in the candidate’s the candidate’s successsuccess
• Driven by the Individual Induction Plan which is informed by the Evidence of Competency & candidate assessment
• Induction Plan may address current position or a position to which that the candidate aspires
• Individual Induction Plan completed within __ days of program entrance by mentor, candidate, program sponsor, and employer
• Application of prior knowledge (gained during the preliminary program)
2828
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components
Tier II programs are Tier II programs are aboutabout– growth in competency growth in competency – application of application of
knowledgeknowledge The earning of the The earning of the
preliminary credential preliminary credential certifies that one is certifies that one is competent at an entry competent at an entry level; the clear level; the clear program builds upon program builds upon that competence via that competence via applicationapplication
• Driven by the Individual Induction Plan which is informed by the Evidence of Competency & candidate assessment
• Induction Plan may address current position or a position to which that the candidate aspires
• Individual Induction Plan completed within __ days of program entrance by mentor, candidate, program sponsor, and employer
• Application of prior knowledge (gained during the preliminary program)
2929
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components The standards would The standards would
determine the qualities of determine the qualities of the formative assessment the formative assessment system elementssystem elements
Specific educational topics Specific educational topics would be addressed by the would be addressed by the system, e.g.system, e.g.– Accountability Accountability
measuresmeasures– Student achievementStudent achievement– Range of learnersRange of learners– Leading systemic Leading systemic
changechange
• Formative Assessment system (curriculum) addresses issues around student achievement, range of learners, etc.
• Professional Development requirement (e.g. seminars, courses, online events, shadowing)
• Frequent Reflection on Practice, individually & with mentor
• Criteria of completion used to determine exit criteria
3030
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components The Individual Induction Plan The Individual Induction Plan
will include a research will include a research component designed by the component designed by the candidate and approved by candidate and approved by program personnelprogram personnel
Professional Development Professional Development may take many formsmay take many forms– SeminarsSeminars– College coursesCollege courses– Online eventsOnline events– ShadowingShadowing– Reading articles, booksReading articles, books– Professional organizationsProfessional organizations
• Formative Assessment system (curriculum) addresses issues around student achievement, range of learners, etc.
• Professional Development requirement (e.g. seminars, courses, online events, shadowing)
• Frequent Reflection on Practice, individually & with mentor
• Criteria of completion used to determine exit criteria
3131
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components In-depth reflection on In-depth reflection on
both the process and both the process and the product of activities the product of activities chosen to demonstrate chosen to demonstrate the CPSELthe CPSEL
Reflection via Reflection via conversation with conversation with mentor and through mentor and through written means (e.g. written means (e.g. journaling)journaling)
Reflections completed Reflections completed both individually and both individually and with mentorwith mentor
• Formative Assessment system (curriculum) addresses issues around student achievement, range of learners, etc.
• Professional Development requirement (e.g. seminars, courses, online events, shadowing)
• Frequent Reflection on Practice, individually & with mentor
• Criteria of completion used to determine exit criteria
3232
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Clear Program ComponentsClear Program Components
The standards would The standards would allow each program to allow each program to determine its own determine its own measurement for measurement for what is an adequate what is an adequate demonstration of demonstration of program completion program completion
(e.g. “competent” level (e.g. “competent” level on adopted rubric)on adopted rubric)
• Formative Assessment system (curriculum) addresses issues around student achievement, range of learners, etc.
• Professional Development requirement (e.g. seminars, courses, online events, shadowing)
• Frequent Reflection on Practice, individually & with mentor
• Criteria of completion used to determine exit criteria
Email comments to [email protected] 3333
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Credential RenewalCredential Renewal
Additional Additional conversation points:conversation points:– Once a person Once a person
secures a principal secures a principal position, an additional position, an additional year of mentoring/ year of mentoring/ support be providedsupport be provided
– Perhaps an additional Perhaps an additional year of year of mentoring/support be mentoring/support be provided a new provided a new Superintendent as Superintendent as well?well?
• A Clear Credential is valid for 5 years.
• Renewal is based upon application and fee.
• Professional growth beyond the clear is the responsibility of the employer.
Email comments to [email protected] 3434
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
System QualitiesSystem Qualities
Multiple Pathways/Sponsors for Multiple Pathways/Sponsors for preliminary and clear programspreliminary and clear programs
Alignment of StandardsAlignment of Standards Accountability MeasuresAccountability Measures Induction into the ProfessionInduction into the Profession Collaboration among stakeholder Collaboration among stakeholder
groupsgroups
3535
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
AB 430AB 430 Programs sunset July 1, 2012 and the Programs sunset July 1, 2012 and the
Education Code is repealed on January 1, Education Code is repealed on January 1, 2013. 2013.
Programs may continue as currently designed Programs may continue as currently designed as a professional development programas a professional development program
To be a credentialing program, must meet the To be a credentialing program, must meet the requirements set by the CTC through Program requirements set by the CTC through Program StandardsStandards
3636
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Accreditation in CaliforniaAccreditation in California
All Administrative Services credential programs All Administrative Services credential programs participate in a seven-year cycle of activitiesparticipate in a seven-year cycle of activities– Biennial Reports—examining effectivenessBiennial Reports—examining effectiveness– Program Assessment—determining Program Assessment—determining
alignmentalignment– Site Visit—judging implementationSite Visit—judging implementation
Depending on the judgment of the Committee Depending on the judgment of the Committee on Accreditation, an institution may continue on Accreditation, an institution may continue to offer an Administrative Services credential to offer an Administrative Services credential programprogram
3737
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
CollaborationCollaboration As a system, there will be articulation As a system, there will be articulation
and and cooperationcooperation among the program among the program sponsors throughout the system sponsors throughout the system
Both the preliminary program and the Both the preliminary program and the clear program will provide input on IIP clear program will provide input on IIP regarding candidate strengths and regarding candidate strengths and areas for growth areas for growth
During the clear credential program, During the clear credential program, the program sponsor and the employer the program sponsor and the employer are co-providers, equally responsible are co-providers, equally responsible for the activities, completion, and for the activities, completion, and success of the candidatesuccess of the candidate
3838
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
The MatrixThe Matrix
Organizational Tool Organizational Tool 16 topics16 topics Illustrates the topics identified by the Illustrates the topics identified by the
panel, the options considered, and panel, the options considered, and the final decision on a the final decision on a recommendation in this arearecommendation in this area
Not yet ready for publicationNot yet ready for publication
3939
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Matrix topicsMatrix topics Single or Multiple Single or Multiple
Credentials for Credentials for Multiple Multiple Administrative Roles Administrative Roles
Multi-Level Multi-Level Credential Credential
Multiple Pathways to Multiple Pathways to Earn the Credential Earn the Credential
Professional Growth Professional Growth for Credential for Credential renewal renewal
Fieldwork Fieldwork Experiences for Tier Experiences for Tier I programsI programs
Internship Internship Credential StatusCredential Status
Induction model for Induction model for Tier II programsTier II programs
Timeframe for Timeframe for Beginning a Tier II Beginning a Tier II Program Program
4040
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Matrix topicsMatrix topics
Examination as a Examination as a route to earning a route to earning a credentialcredential
Role of the CPSEL Role of the CPSEL Changed roles of Changed roles of
site administrators site administrators and today’s schools and today’s schools
Enhancing Enhancing Partnerships Partnerships between K-12 and between K-12 and preparation preparation programs programs
Ensuring the fidelity Ensuring the fidelity of the program of the program standards with standards with implementation implementation
Superintendent Superintendent Preparation Preparation
Experience in the Experience in the Public Schools Public Schools
Maintain the pipeline Maintain the pipeline of excellent of excellent candidates for candidates for administrative administrative credential credential
4141
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Public Input TimePublic Input Time
Time frames for each section of the Time frames for each section of the LTLS, followed by general comments LTLS, followed by general comments about the work as a wholeabout the work as a whole
Write your name on a card colored to Write your name on a card colored to match the topic for which you’d like match the topic for which you’d like to provide inputto provide input
4242
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Topics and Colored CardsTopics and Colored Cards
Pre-Program requirements--Pre-Program requirements--BLUEBLUE Preliminary Credential routes--Preliminary Credential routes--
GREENGREEN Clear Credential routes--Clear Credential routes--YELLOWYELLOW Renewal options--Renewal options--PINKPINK Other--WHITEOther--WHITE
4343
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Online inputOnline input
• Public input regarding the information Public input regarding the information presented here is available online at presented here is available online at http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ASCPuhttp://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ASCPublicInputblicInput
• Five boxes with identified topics are Five boxes with identified topics are provided (repeat of today’s topics)provided (repeat of today’s topics)
• We ask responders to please be brief We ask responders to please be brief and to the pointand to the point
• Online input will be received through Online input will be received through July 10July 10thth at 11:59 pm at 11:59 pm
4444
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Public InputPublic Input Once your name is called, push the button Once your name is called, push the button
on your microphone, speak into the mic on your microphone, speak into the mic and then turn it off when you are doneand then turn it off when you are done
Each speaker is asked to limit comments Each speaker is asked to limit comments to three minutes on each topicto three minutes on each topic
We will also be monitoring email for We will also be monitoring email for questions and comments to be madequestions and comments to be made
The session will end no later than noonThe session will end no later than noon
4545
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
How to Provide Public InputHow to Provide Public Input
State your nameState your name
Identify an organizational or Identify an organizational or institutional affiliation, if you wish to institutional affiliation, if you wish to do sodo so
Make your commentsMake your comments
4646
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
Next StepsNext Steps
Public input through July 10, 2011 Public input through July 10, 2011 gathered and talliedgathered and tallied
All input will be provided to the panel All input will be provided to the panel membersmembers
July meeting of the panel to finalize July meeting of the panel to finalize recommendationsrecommendations
Presentation of recommendations to Presentation of recommendations to the Commission targeted for Octoberthe Commission targeted for October
4747
Co
mm
issi
on
on
Tea
cher
Cre
den
tial
ing
Ensuring Educator Excellence
For more information, contactFor more information, contact
Cheryl Hickey, Administrator of Cheryl Hickey, Administrator of AccreditationAccreditation– [email protected]@ctc.ca.gov
Gay Roby, ConsultantGay Roby, Consultant– [email protected]@ctc.ca.gov
Larry Birch, Retired AnnuitantLarry Birch, Retired Annuitant– [email protected]@ctc.ca.gov
4848