Comhairle Contae Chiarraí · Class 10 The treatment of any waste on land with a consequential...

Comhairle Contae Chiarraí

Kerry County Council

Waste Licence Ref No. W0001-04

Annual Environmental Report for North Kerry Landfill 2018

Reporting Period:

January 2018 – December 2018

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:14

of 31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 Introduction and Reporting Period ....................................................................................................... 3

2.0 Waste Activities carried out at the Facility ............................................................................................ 3

3.0 Quantity and composition of waste received, disposed and recovered .................................................... 4

4.0 Remaining Capacity and Closure Date ................................................................................................ 5

5.0 Method of Deposition of Waste at North Kerry Landfill ........................................................................... 5

6.0 Summary Report on Emissions for the Reporting Period. ...................................................................... 6

7.0 Resource and Energy Consumption. ................................................................................................... 8

8.0 Energy Efficiency and Audit Report Summary ...................................................................................... 8

9.0 Proposed Development of the Facility and timescale of the Development ............................................... 8

10.0 Volume of leachate produced and volume transported off site. ............................................................... 9

11.0 Report on Development Works Undertaken during the Reporting Period ................................................. 9

12.0 Report on Restoration of Completed Cells and Phases ......................................................................... 9

13.0 Site Survey showing existing Levels of the Facility at the end of the reporting period ................................ 9

14.0 Estimated Annual and Cumulative quantities of landfill gas emitted from the Facility .............................. 10

13.0 Estimated Annual and Cumulative quantities of Indirect Emissions to Groundwater ............................... 14

14.0 Annual Water Balance Calculation and Interpretation .......................................................................... 14

15.0 Report on the Progress towards Achievement of Environmental Objectives .......................................... 15

19.0 Schedule of environmental objectives and targets for the forthcoming year. .......................................... 16

20.0 Summary of Procedures Developed by the Licensee during the reporting period ................................... 17

21.0 Tank, Pipeline and Bund Testing and Inspection Report ...................................................................... 17

22.0 Environmental Incidents and Complaints ............................................................................................ 17

24.0 Report on Financial Provision ........................................................................................................... 18

25.0 Management and Staffing Structure at the Facility 2017 ...................................................................... 19

26.0 Programme of Public Information ...................................................................................................... 20

27.0 Training of Staff 2018 ....................................................................................................................... 20

28.0 Cost of Landfill / Community Fund. .................................................................................................... 20

29.0 Meteorological, Noise and Dust Monitoring Results ............................................................................. 22

30.0 Statement on the Achievement of the Waste Acceptance and Treatment Obligations ............................. 22

Appendix A: Historic Data .......................................................................................................................... 23

Appendix B: Summary of results and Interpretation of Environmental Monitoring............................................. 24

Appendix C: Gas Model Review ................................................................................................................. 26

Appendix D: Monthly Balancing Records – Gas field .................................................................................... 27

Appendix E: Landfill Gas Survey 2018 ........................................................................................................ 28

Appendix F: Engine Stack Monitoring Testing .............................................................................................. 29

Appendix G: PRTR Report 2018 ................................................................................................................. 30

Appendix H: Topographical Survey 2018 ..................................................................................................... 31

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:14

of 31

1.0 Introduction and Reporting Period Kerry County Council (KCC) operated a municipal solid waste landfill facility at Muingnaminnane, Kielduff, Tralee, Co. Kerry. It is located approximately 8km northeast of Tralee, in the Stacks Mountains. The landfill site accepted solid waste for disposal and is operated under licence W0001-04. This Annual Environment Report is prepared in accordance with Condition 12.6 and Schedule F of Waste Licence W0001-04. The reporting period for this Annual Environmental Report is from January 1st, 2018 to December 31st, 2018. The acceptance of waste for landfilling and for recycling ceased on site on the 11th July 2014. Both the landfill site and the civic amenity site are now closed to all customers. Kerry County Council is now looking at alternative options for North Kerry Landfill and the Agency will be advised and consulted on the same as this progresses. 2.0 Waste Activities carried out at the Facility Waste disposal activities carried out at North Kerry Landfill were in accordance with Part 1 of Waste Licence W0001-04. Licenced activities include; Class 2 Land treatment, including biodegradation of liquid or sludge discards in soils. Class 4 Surface impoundment, including placement of liquid or sludge discards into pits, ponds or

lagoons. Class 5 Specially engineered landfill, including placement into lined discrete cells which are capped

and isolated from one another and the environment. Class 6 Biological treatment not referred to elsewhere in this Schedule which results in final

compounds or mixtures which are disposed of by means of any activity referred to in paragraphs 1 to 10 of this Schedule.

Class 7 Physico-chemical treatments not referred to elsewhere in this Schedule which results in final

compounds or mixtures which are disposed of by means of any activity referred to in paragraphs 1 to 10 of this Schedule.

Class 11 Blending or mixture prior to submission to any activity referred to in a preceding paragraph of

this Schedule. Class 12 Repackaging prior to submission to any activity referred to in a preceding paragraph of this

Schedule. Class 13 Storage prior to submission to any activity referred to in a preceding paragraph of this

Schedule, other than temporary storage, pending collection, on the premises where the waste concerned is produced.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:14

of 31

Waste recovery activities carried out at North Kerry Landfill are in accordance with Part 1 of Waste Licence W0001-04. Licenced activities include: Class 2 Recycling or reclamation of organic substances which are not used as solvents (including

composting and other biological transformation processes). Class 3 Recycling or reclamation of metals and metal compounds. Class 4 Recycling or reclamation of other inorganic materials. Class 10 The treatment of any waste on land with a consequential benefit for an agricultural activity or

ecological system. Class 11 Use of waste obtained from any activity referred to in a preceding paragraph of this

Schedule. Class 13 Storage of waste intended for submission to any activity referred to in a preceding paragraph

of this Schedule, other than temporary storage, pending collection, on the premises where such waste is produced.

3.0 Quantity and composition of waste received, disposed and recovered The acceptance of waste for landfilling and for recycling ceased on site on the 11th July 2014. Both the landfill site and the civic amenity site are now closed to all customers. Kerry County Council is now looking at alternative options for the site. Kerry County Council have procured Consultants to manage this project. Quantity of Waste disposed at facility Since opening in May 1994 to the closure in July 2014, the total quantity of waste disposed of at the facility was 888,400 tonnes. BMW Percentage Composition of Waste disposed at facility

Year Period Total Qty MSW of which the BMW

Condition Applies

Total Qty BMW

% BMW

2010 Q3 – Q4 9,461.84 5,834.46 61.66 2011 Q1 – Q4 16,315.41 10,301.91 63.14 2012 Q1 – Q4 71,006.59 44,689.45 62.94 2013 Q1 – Q4 55,117.72 30,668.49 55.64 2014 Q1 – Q4 4,741.01 2,628.35 55.44 2015 Q1 – Q4 0 0 0 2016 Q1 – Q4 0 0 0 2017 Q1 – Q4 0 0 0 2018 Q1 – Q4 0 0 0

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:14

of 31

Please note that submitted figures for 2013 and 2014 were incorrect below shows the discrepancies in both.

Year BMW Returns Total Waste

Landfilled Total BMW (biological municipal waste)

% BMW

2013 Reported 55,117.72 30668.49 55.64%

Actual 55,276.68 29,749.68 53.52%

2014 Reported 4,741.01 2,628.35 55.44%

Actual 4,521.4 2,476.83 54.78%

2015 Reported 0 0 0

Actual 0 0 0

2016 Reported 0 0 0

Actual 0 0 0

2017 Reported 0 0 0

Actual 0 0 0

2018 Reported 0 0 0

Actual 0 0 0

4.0 Remaining Capacity and Closure Date The North Kerry Landfill and civic amenity site ceased operation on the 11th July 2014. The Total Permitted Landfill Capacity is 1,527,567 m³ as per Table A.2 of the Waste Licence and the total quantity of waste disposed of at the facility is 888,400 m³ which leaves an undeveloped licensed volume of

639,167 m³ which could be utilised in the future. 5.0 Method of Deposition of Waste at North Kerry Landfill The civic amenity ceased operation on the 11th July 2014.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:14

of 31

6.0 Summary Report on Emissions for the Reporting Period. Emissions to Water. A full report prepared by the Environmental Laboratory of KCC is included in this document in Appendix B. Also included are the Invertebrate Results and Biological Assessment. The verified lab results are also provided in Appendix B. David Lenihan SE Chemist and his team members Caroline Markey, Iona McGloin, Andrew Scanlon and Tim Supple carried out the sampling, testing and reporting for the North Kerry Landfill. Emissions to Air. Gas management practices at North Kerry Landfill are an interlinked system of actions no one of which can fully control or manage the generation of LFG from the deposited waste mass. In combination however, they comply fully with the requirements of the licence. The Systems and operations include:

o Active management of the gas control infrastructure o Odour patrol o Monitoring and testing of infrastructure

The infrastructure in place at North Kerry Landfill includes the construction of a basal liner and capping system. Outside the footprint of the landfill is a network of LFG monitoring boreholes. There are constructed in a grid around the footprint of the area that waste has been deposited within. These wells are monitored on a monthly basis for the presence of a suite of indicator gases that would signal the possible migration of LFG. Perimeter Gas Wells No. 6 through to 6d continues to show CH4 and CO2 concentrations above the allowable limits. These are historically problematic wells. In 2004 wells 6a to 6d were constructed to monitor the gas migration in the vicinity of gas well 6. These perimeter gas wells also showed gas concentration levels in excess of the allowable at times during the year. It is noted however that there is no odour nuisance at the location of gas wells 6 through to 6d or any evidence of vegetation die back. The likely cause was due to historical contamination issues. The perimeter Gas Wells 6, 6a to 6d were constructed on a man-made embankment. Perimeter gas well 6 is currently connected to the gas extraction system and is under a low negative pressure. In November 2011, the gas to energy project was successfully commissioned. A Genset of nominal rating -330 kW is in operation at the facility. The demand of the generation plant has been balanced against the generation output of the field. Field balancing and network management are vital components of a successful operation of the gas to energy project. These are actively managed by B9 to ensure maximum production. Over the last 12 to 18 months, gas production has reduced considerably. B9 Power Ltd have operated the engine continuously throughout the year. In relation to the flare downtime, B9 Power Ltd has been only operating the engine due to the reduced quantity of landfill gas produced on site, as shown on the SCADA graphs over the last year. In accordance with the licence condition 3.15.3, 'landfill gas shall be utilised as an energy resource where feasible and possible as maybe agreed by the Agency' which is why the engine takes preference to the flare. The engine is only operating at part load due to the limited gas available and there is insufficient gas to operate the gas flare. This was noted to the EPA on previous discussions and in particular at the site visit SV14537 and the Gas and Leachate Management Report 2018 under licence return LR034773.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:14

of 31

B9 Power Ltd and KCC have been proactive in trying to identify any potential issues and ways of increasing gas production/recovery over the last couple of years. As shown in the Gas & leachate Management Report 2018, KCC installed 9 no. additional gas wells and have carried out remedial works but with limited improvement to gas yields. Furthermore, KCC are currently carrying out works to dewater a number of wells. On an annual basis, KCC procure competent odour consultants to check for fugitive emissions. Odour Monitoring Ireland Ltd carried out such surveys in the past at the request of the EPA and in 2018, when the gas abstraction was on in accordance with best practice, there were no fugitive emissions highlighted. This showed that KCC could continue with the gas engine (Capacity at 400m3/hr @ 26% CH4) as the gas engine has more than enough capacity to deal with actual flows. The gas levels on the SCADA monitor is as follows recorded in early Jan 2019:

The integrity of the gas infrastructure is very good as illustrated by the constant suctions recorded across the site (i.e. no pressure drops caused by condensate blockages in the pipework) & the low oxygen levels. However, the quality of methane produced is very low and this has been the case for a while but B9 Power Ltd continues to balance the gas extraction system on a frequent basis to optimise the gas where possible. To prove that gas production has been reducing over the last while, KCC procured Fehily Timoney & Co to look at the gas model and update it. This is included in Appendix C Gas Balancing records, Landfill Gas Survey, Engine Stack Monitoring are included in are Appendices: D, E, and F.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:14

of 31

7.0 Resource and Energy Consumption. The following is the energy consumption for North Kerry Landfill for the reporting period. Diesel The diesel usage for the reporting period (1st January to 31st December 2018) was 276 litres. This is a significant decrease in diesel of 551 litres from the previous reported year (827 litres). Electricity The total usage for 2018 was 70,750 kWh. This is a significant decrease in energy consumption of 5,400 kWh. This is primarily due to the installation of the SCADA system and more prudent management of resources. 8.0 Energy Efficiency and Audit Report Summary Electricity The kW hour usage on site for 2018 is set out in the attached table.

Table 8.1, kWh usage 2018

Month Consumption (kWh)

Jan 2018 7,250.85

Feb 2018 6,549.15

Mar 2018 6,733.61

Apr 2018 6,516.39

May 2018 5,031.15

June 2018 4,868.85

July 2018 4,325.00

Aug 2018 4,325.00

Sept 2018 5,483.61

Oct 2018 5,666.39

Nov 2018 6,885.25

Dec 2018 7,114.75

70,750.00

9.0 Proposed Development of the Facility and timescale of the Development The following projects are proposed at North Kerry Landfill over 2019. Optimal Uses of the NKL Site Kerry County Council (KCC) have sought Provision of Environmental Consultancy Services for proposals recommending the optimal uses of the North Kerry Landfill at Muingnaminnane, County Kerry. Landfilling activities on site ceased on the 11th July 2014. There is no further built capacity on site, however there is

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:14

of 31

approx. 500,000 m3 of un-built licensed capacity available over approximately 30 acres that could be developed.

Minor Remediation of capping If the VOC survey scheduled for March 2019 highlights areas for potential fugitive gases, Kerry County Council will undertake minor repairs and also make improvements to the capping system. 10.0 Volume of leachate produced and volume transported off site.

Over the reporting period, 30,970.3m3 of leachate was produced on site. The total quantity of leachate produced on site since the landfill site opened in May 1994 to the end of the reporting period is 997,007.21 m3 Table 10.1, Leachate volumes tankered off – site 2018

Month 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

January 11,271.74 9,991.34 14,069.56 6,375.97 6,356.84 3,688.90 4,860.34

February 6,780.04 10,926.18 11,161.2 2,905.77 7,070.08 2,582.86 3,308.58

March 2,502.62 2,412.84 6,039.42 4,176.74 3,279.08 3,611.28 2,495.22

April 3,623.48 5,506.44 3,269.7 2,231.66 3,942.24 708.52 2,265.16

May 3,724.42 5,322.99 3,479.30 3,859.72 1,562.26 473.76 1,878.12

June 4,351.31 3,488.05 2,358.17 2,563.78 1,595.84 1,472.00 1,178.16

July 7,551.38 2,313.66 1,317.42 1,457.82 3,436.38 1,728.52 502.60

August 6,072.90 4,572.32 3,043.37 2,236.16 3,034.40 2,043.16 1,242.70

September 4,576.09 2,028.98 1,229.30 2,606.70 2,665.06 3,173.12 2,334.90

October 5775.56 5,791.80 3,748.06 2,434.60 2,257.14 3,218.44 1,786.20

November 6997.38 9,154.71 6,346.25 5,147.28 2,654.80 3,867.16 3,631.30

December 5836.08 6,320.70 5,102.68 8,033.48 1,626.74 4,333.48 5,487.02

Total 69,063.00 67,830.01 61,164.43 44,029.68 39,480.86 30,901.20 30,970.30

11.0 Report on Development Works Undertaken during the Reporting Period KCC installed an upgraded Electrical system at the old part of the landfill (Cells 1 to 16) containing new cables, telemetry, SCADA and leachate pumps and panels. 12.0 Report on Restoration of Completed Cells and Phases

All constructed cells 1 – 19 are fully capped with a gas extraction system. 13.0 Site Survey showing existing Levels of the Facility at the end of the reporting period

See Appendix H for Topographical Survey 2018 showing contours of the landfill area

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:14

of 31

14.0 Estimated Annual and Cumulative quantities of landfill gas emitted from the Facility The Landfill Gas Prediction Model was revised by Fehily Timoney & Co in Dec 2018 following the previous revision in 2016. 1. Actual vs Theoretical

hrs Flow m3/hr total m3 methane

% methane m3

Flare Jan 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Feb 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Mar 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Apr 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

May 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Jun 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Jul 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Aug 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Sep 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Oct 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Nov 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Dec 0 0 0.00 0.00 0

Engine Jan 678 230 155,940.00 32.00 48,903

Feb 618 200 123,600.00 30.00 36,338

Mar 626 190 118,940.00 30.00 34,968

Apr 618 160 98,880.00 32.00 31,009

May 658 170 111,860.00 30.00 32,887

Jun 627 140 87,780.00 30.00 25,807

Jul 667 110 73,370.00 45.00 32,356

Aug 687 160 109,920.00 33.60 36,194

Sep 679 170 115,430.00 30.00 33,936

Oct 674 150 101,100.00 32.00 31,705

Nov 651 150 97,650.00 33.00 31,580

Dec 634 210 133,140.00 30.00 39,143

7,817.00 170.00 1,327,610.00 32.30 414,828

@98% Combustion efficiency

hrs rate m3/hr total m3 %

Methane Total

Theoretical 8,760.00 170 1,489,200.00 32.30 481,012 methane

m3

Methane (m3) Density Total (kg)

Theoretical 481,011.60 0.67 320,400.14 kg Actual 414,827.65 0.67 279,411.19 kg 40.99 tonnes unexplained

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

These figures were used in the estimation of landfill gas generation over the reporting period and submitted as part of the Landfill Gas Survey 2018 (Appendix E) and the PRTR 2018 (Appendix G) online Kerry County Council engaged Fehily Timoney & Co to carry a review of the Gas Model in Dec 2018. The development of Gas Predication model for future PRTR estimates that historical landfill gas prediction modelling for the landfill significantly overestimated the potential generation of landfill gas. This over-estimation when referenced to utilisation and flaring flow rates suggested that there were significant fugitive emissions escaping from the waste body. This is not the case as evidenced by:

• VOC emission survey results • No odour issues • No evidence of vegetation die-back

B9 Power Ltd. has a financial incentive to capture landfill gas for utilisation. The audit findings in 2018 suggest that the gas that is being produced is being utilised by the gas engine. FTC believes that gas production flow rates on the site will be similar to current flow rates and will most likely remain low for many years. As leachate drains and is removed following secondary consolidation of the waste, breakdown of the waste body will be initiated in what were leachate saturated pockets and gas production is likely to continue for many years albeit at lower gas production rates. The graphs below presents a range of indicative gas production curve of future gas production flow rates. The calibration is based on existing available information

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

Gas Model 2016 – Fehily Timoney & Co.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

Gas Model 2018 – Fehily Timoney & Co.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

13.0 Estimated Annual and Cumulative quantities of Indirect Emissions to Groundwater None to report.

14.0 Annual Water Balance Calculation and Interpretation The predicted Water Mass Balance calculation shows predicted leachate production for 2017.

Lo = [ER(A) + LW + IRCA + ER(l)] - [aW]

1 2 3 4

Year Active Phase

Active Area

Active Area infiltration

Restored Phase No.

LiquidWaste

RestoredArea

Restored Area

Infiltration ER(I)Total Water

AbsorptiveCapacity

Leachate Produced

Actual Leachate Difference

A (m2) ER(A) (m3)

LW (m3) RCA (m2) IRCA (m3)

1+2+3+4 (m3) aW (m3) Lo (m3) (m3) (m3)

2002 5 11,800.00 19,918.40 1,2,3 0 22,050 2,840.04 3127.264 25,885.70 1,770.81 49,771.34 34,218.23 -15,553.11 2003 6 16,100.00 20,946.10 1,2,3,4 0 25,450 2,547.55 2430.428 25,924.07 879.12 51,436.60 30,721.59 -20,715.01 2004 6 19,500.00 32,416.80 1,2,3,4 0 27,550 3,306.00 35,722.80 840.95 37,947.25 45,130.40 7,183.15 2005 6,7 16,200.00 27,596.70 1,2,3,4,5 0 29,600 4,004.88 31,601.58 602.54 34,155.79 54,784.59 20,628.80 2006 7 28,800.00 27,596.70 1,2,3,4,5 0 29,600 4,025.60 31,622.30 1,050.44 33,361.86 60,922.61 27,560.75 2007 7 14,400.00 24,036.48 1,2,3,4,5,6 0 53,340 6,769.91 30,806.39 1,391.46 33,307.30 55,436.15 22,128.85 2008 8 24,300.00 50,517.27 1,2,3,4,5,6 0 53,340 6,931.00 57,448.27 1,528.82 59,811.81 78,558.23 18,746.42 2009 8 32,400.00 62,763.98 1,2,3,4,5,6 0 53,340 8,295.22 71,059.21 695.72 73,862.60 73,727.85 -134.75 2010 8 32,400.00 43,957.08 1,2,3,4,5,7 0 63,340 4,736.82 48,693.90 367.27 50,009.27 42,442.00 -7,567.27 2011 8 32,400.00 45,398.88 1,2,3,4,5,7 0 63,340 1,280.86 46,679.74 289.55 46,845.19 50,108.58 3,263.39 2012 8,9 33,616.67 61,630.45 1,2,3,4,5,7,8 0 95,740 11,620.16 73,250.60 1,242.62 72,462.98 69,063.01 -3,399.97 2013 9 38,323.34 53,334.59 1,2,3,4,5,7,8 0 95,740 9,650.59 62,985.18 967.33 62,472.84 67,830.10 5,357.26 2014 9 21,515.00 38,468.82 1,2,3,4,5,7,8 0 134,063 13,961.32 52,430.14 79.12 52,806.01 61,164.43 8,358.42 2015 9 21,515.00 9,524.69 1,2,3,4,5,7,8 0 134,063 12,371.33 21,896.02 23.81 23,948.51 44,029.68 20,081.17 2016 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9 0 134,063 12,371.33 12,371.33 0.00 14,447.63 39,480.86 25,033.23

2017 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9 0 134,063 12,371.33 12,371.33 0.00 14,447.63 30,901.20 16,453.57

2018 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9 0 134,063 12,371.33 12,371.33 0.00 14,447.63 30,970.30 16,522.67

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

15.0 Report on the Progress towards Achievement of Environmental Objectives

Target Area Objective Works Carried Out Results

Reduction in Fugitive Gas Emissions Reduction in number of on-site minor surface emissions following two VOC surveys

Regular patrol of gas collection infrastructure to ensure that there are no blockages on the lines. Minor remediation works on gas wells and side risers Nine new gas well drilled and connected to the network

No Odour Complaints in 2018.

Surface Water Emissions Keep Surface Water Emissions within agreed limits

Proper management of leachate on site. Regular inspection of surface water drains Regular inspection of bunded area for integrity on site Quarterly service and calibration of process monitors

No ammonia levels exceeded in surface water lagoons.

Ground Water Emissions Keep Ground Water Emissions to within agreed limits

Proper management of leachate levels on site. Eight boreholes sampled on thirty-two occasions

No licence limit exceeded in Boreholes

Leachate Management Reduction in the quantity of leachate produced on site

Gas Wells remediated Minor reshaping of capping to improve run-off On-going maintenance of swails/drains

Slight decrease in leachate produced on site during reporting period.

Energy Resources Reduce the quantity of diesel and electricity used on site

Electrical Upgrade works and prudent management of energy resources.

Significant decrease in electricity and diesel consumption on site

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

19.0 Schedule of environmental objectives and targets for the forthcoming year. The following tables sets out the environmental objectives for the facility under a range of headings.

Target Area

Objective

Actions to be progressed and methods

By

2019

2020 2021

Reduction in Fugitive Gas Emissions

Reduction in number of surface emissions from VOC Survey

o Minor remediation works around gas wells and side risers

LM

On-going

Surface Water Emissions Keep surface water emissions within limits

o Proper management of leachate on site

o Monitoring of SCADA to Cells 1 to 19

o Regular inspection of surface water drains

o Regular inspection of bunded area for integrity on site

LM

LM

LM

LM

On-going

On-going

On-going

On-going

On-going

On-going

On-going

On-going

On-going

On-going

On-going

On-going

Ground Water Emissions No emissions o Proper management of leachate on site

LM On-going

On-going

On-going

Leachate Management Reduction in the quantity of leachate produced on site

o Remediation works to capping o Repair any leaks detected on the

lining

LM On-going

On-going

On-going

LM – Landfill Manager

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

20.0 Summary of Procedures Developed by the Licensee during the reporting period No additional procedures were developed by the Licensee during the reporting period. 21.0 Tank, Pipeline and Bund Testing and Inspection Report Integrity testing was completed on leachate lagoons 1 and 2 in 2016. Integrity testing is to be carried out every 3 years as per Waste Licence Conditions. It is due again for re-testing in 2019. 22.0 Environmental Incidents and Complaints Environmental Incidents The incidents reported to the agency refer to exceedances experienced in perimeter gas wells 6 to 6d and PGDW E9. It is noted that there were no odour nuisances in the perimeter gas well exceedances or no vegetative die back and so it is thought that the readings in gas well 6 to 6d refer to a sump effect in a rock fill embankment that is at a finished construction height above the original ground level. Well 6 is currently connected to the gas extraction system and this is noted in the monthly returns to the Agency. Complaints There were no complaints received for the reporting period (2018). There were none in 2017, 2016, 2015, 1 in 2014 and 10 in 2013 Table 18.1: Breakdown of complaints received over last five years

Issue 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Odour 16 5 1 0 0 0 0

Illegal Dumping 3 1 0 0 0 0 0

Rubbish on Main Road 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Uncovered/unsecure loads being admitted into landfill site

9 0 0 0 0 0 0

Flies 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Site Infrastructure 3 3 0 0 0 0 0

Speeding Leachate Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Noise from Leachate Lorries at Treatment Plant

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Windblown litter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Number of Complaints 37 10 1 0 0 0 0

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

24.0 Report on Financial Provision Kerry County Council has a Landfill Aftercare and Development Fund. The CRAMP report as submitted to the agency and approved in March 2015 requires the Kerry County Council to maintain the landfill site both during its active phase and closed phase. A review by Kerry County Council was completed in Dec 2016 and submitted to the Agency for approval. Kerry County Council is well positioned to meet its financial liabilities. The EPA have corresponded with the Local Authorities to make financial provisions to cover any liabilities associated with the operation (including closure and aftercare) of the facility, as per Condition 13.3.3. Kerry County Council have submitted licensee returns to deal with these liabilities.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

25.0 Management and Staffing Structure at the Facility 2017

Kerry County Council

Chief Executive: Ms. Moira Murrell

Director of Services: Mr John Breen

Senior Executive Officer: Mr. Ger O’Brien

Engineers: Mr. David Donegan & Mr Alan Kennelly

KCC Accredited Laboratory Mr. David Lenihan Caroline Markey Iona McGloin Tim Supple Andrew Scanlon

Environmental Consultants and Contractors and other key stakeholders (Various)

Landfill Manager:

Mr PJ McAuliffe

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

26.0 Programme of Public Information The site has been closed since 11th July 2014. Therefore, all relevant files are available on site for the Agency’s inspection 27.0 Training of Staff 2018 The Landfill Manager is up to date with regards to training in SAFEPASS, First Aid and Fire Marshalling. The site manager completed all remaining waste management modules in 2018. The Landfill Manager has completed the Waste Management Training Programme Module 1 to 6 28.0 Cost of Landfill / Community Fund.

Please see Condition 13.5 of Waste Licence referenced W000 1-04 The licensee shall provide the sum of €57,419 per annum (index linked) for local environmental and community initiatives for each year that the landfill accepts waste for disposal. A report on the use of this annual fund shall be included in the Annual Environmental Report to the Agency. The Community Fund is operated under the Local Government Act 2001 – Section 109 – (1) In this section "community initiative" means any project or programme which in the opinion of the local authority will benefit the local community and includes the provision or improvement of amenity, recreational, cultural or heritage facilities, the protection or enhancement of the environment and programmes to promote social inclusion and community development. As no waste was accepted at North Kerry Landfill in 2017, Kerry County Council did not allocate any money to the Community Fund. There is a balance of approximately €50,000 remaining in the Community Fund. Kerry County Council, Environment Section has been in contact with community leaders & asked them to submit a viable community initiative project (or projects), for consideration. The Environmental Management Team have met with the Landfill Committee to discuss possible projects in 2018.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

The following table gives a breakdown of the financial outlay under the landfilling headings. The Revenue expenditure accounted for €582,919.30 and an extra Expenditure accounted for €261,953.60 to deal with the Electrical Upgrade Project.

Statement of Costs for Waste Operations ‐ NKL 2018

Accelem Accelem (T) Total Charge Euro (1)

60030 Wages 1,383.32

60040 Salaries 108,043.27

60100 ER PRSI 7,234.07

60200 Overtime 77.94

60300 Arrears 16.36

60600 Travel/Subsistence 191.94

60700 Eating on site allowance 7.60

65500 Minor Contracts- Trade Services & other works 176,674.14

66500 Non-Capital Equip Purchase - Fire Services 18.00

67500 Non-Capital Equip Purchase - Computers 3,458.20

68000 Non-Capital Equip Purchase - Office Equip/Furn 767.96

68500 Non-Capital Equip Purchase - Other 1,053.03

69000 Hire (Ext) - Plant/Transport/Machinery & Equipment 23,756.00

69200 Repairs & Maint - Plant 336.27

69260 Repairs & Maint - Other Equip 764.80

69400 Transfers from Machinery Yard 5,133.50

69600 Other Vehicle Expenses 403.86

70000 Materials 18,010.22

70990 Issues from Stores 865.60

71000 Insurance 57,879.79

73400 Staff Travelling & Subsistence Expenses 7,248.20

74500 Entertainment Expenses and Associated Expenses 57.00

75000 Computer Software and Maintenance Fees 61.32

76000 Communication Expenses 1,387.16

77100 Courier 137.00

78000 Training 3,615.00

79900 Consultancy/Professional Fees and Expenses 94,032.22

81000 Printing & Office Consumables 1,400.82

82100 Statutory Contributions to Other Bodies 22,265.00

85000 Rent 406.50

85100 Rates & Other LA Charges 27,488.30

85200 Cleaning 1,390.47

86000 Energy / Utilities 17,354.44

582,919.30

Electrical Upgrade Project @ NKL

Accelem Accelem (T) Total Charge Euro (1)

69300 Capital Contracts Expenditure 261,953.60

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

29.0 Meteorological, Noise and Dust Monitoring Results Table 23.1, Rainfall data 2016 / 2017/ 2018

2016 Rainfall

2017 Rainfall

2018 Rainfall

(mm) (mm) (mm)

Jan 293.8 167.2 238.2

Feb 190.6 138.7 119.1

Mar 104.6 135.1 130.6

Apr 104.0 51.4 204.5

May 77.9 77.8 114.3

Jun 108.0 141.5 39.2

Jul 83.3 108.4 50.1

Aug 105.1 102.8 109.4

Sep 182.7 204.4 118.8

Oct 186.4 162.2 114.7

Nov 76.7 107.4 253.4

Dec 103.8 198.8 278.6

Total 1,616.9 1595.7 1770.9

Noise Monitoring 2018 The Agency has approved a reduction in nuisance monitoring now that the landfill has closed Dust Monitoring 2018 The Agency has approved a reduction in nuisance monitoring now that the landfill has closed

30.0 Statement on the Achievement of the Waste Acceptance and Treatment Obligations None to Report

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

Appendix A: Historic Data

North Kerry Landfill Leachate Tankered Off Site

Waste Tonnes Leachate m3

1994 16,902 1,494.00 1995 23,505 6,475.00 1996 23,722 8,496.37 1997 25,581.88 12,175.49 1998 33,529.67 20,318.09 1999 57,872.71 22,822.95 2000 60,473.65 36,780.71 2001 63,945.91 18,953.85 2002 62,821.52 34,218.23 2003 50,235.29 30,721.59 2004 48,054.47 45,130.40 2005 34,430.82 54,784.59 2006 60,025.22 60,922.61 2007 56,794.24 55,436.15 2008 62,412.96 78,558.53 2009 39,755.40 73,727.85 2010 20,986.80 42,442.73 2011 16,545.71 50,108.58 2012 71,006.59 69,063.01 2013 55,276.68 67,830.01 2014 4,521.40 61,164.43 2015 0 44,029.68 2016 0 39,480.86 2017 0 30,901.20 2018 0 30,970.30

Total 888,400.08 997,007.21

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

Appendix B: Summary of results and Interpretation of Environmental Monitoring

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

Sathorlann CCC North Kerry Landfill: AER Report 2018: Laboratory Monitoring 26th Mar 2019 KCC Laboratory

David Lenihan 1 of 18

ANNUAL ENVIRONMENT REPORT Physio-chemical and Biological Monitoring of North Kerry Landfill

2018 Prepared by: David Lenihan Senior Executive Chemist 26/03/2019 INTRODUCTION As Part of requirements under EPA Licence for North Kerry landfill this laboratory produces a report on a six-monthly basis as well as an annual detailed report. This report can thus be interpreted as Laboratory contribution to Annual Environment report. Enclosed are:

Annual results in spreadsheet format for Leachate, Surface Water and Groundwater (2014 to 2018) as required per monitoring provisions as of licence requirements for 2017. Please refer to these as you read report

Interpretation of results pertaining to three matrices of concern i.e. Groundwater,

Surface water and Leachate

Results from ELS contract laboratory pertaining to individual List 1 and List 2 organics which were analysed for in Nov 2018 at four groundwater locations App3

Appendix 1 detailing sample locations and associated grid references used in report

Table 1 outlines trigger values for strategic parameters analysed in groundwater

Appendix 2 details list of List 1,2 Organics monitored and their associated Limits of

detection (LODs)

Appendix 3; summary of invertebrate report 2018 of impacts sites surrounding North Kerry Landfill. This report was compiled by Caroline Markey and Iona Mc Gloin

All except for analysis of Total cyanide, list 1 and List 2 organic substances, was conducted at KCC laboratory. Analysis on these Parameters (italics and asterix) was farmed out to ELS laboratories Mahon Industrial Estate, Cork. A summary of Environmental requirements has been prepared by Tobin Consulting engineers. This is the document we are using. Results are also included for monthly analysis of groundwater as required by provisions of old licence

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



In 2018 a total of 286 samples were sampled by KCC Laboratory personnel compared to 200 in 2017. The extra samples were due mainly to further research projects. Altogether 2000 tests were analysed to satisfy requirements of licence monitoring. Of these 1980 tests were analysed in KCC laboratory. The outsourced tests were analysed by ELS laboratories. The latter included Cyanide and List1 / 2 organics as required on an annual basis for three groundwater locations It must however be stressed that each test for SVOCs or VOCs comprises analysis for 153 specific compounds. These are included as appendix to this report The monitoring locations monitored are as per requirements of licence. APP1 outlines locations and associated northing’s and easting’s Trigger limits Trigger limits are required to be set for certain parameters in groundwater and submitted to EPA. Perhaps the best such limits to use are groundwater threshold values as set out in groundwater regulations 2009. Other standards used, correspond to drinking water regulatory standards. However, where drinking water limits cannot be adhered to because of natural conditions (non-anthropogenic effects) i.e. Ph the trigger value would have to be more flexible. The trigger values for Boreholes 1 to 4 are as highlighted in Table 1. Borehole 5 appears to be monitoring an aquifer which contains a lot of decaying organic matter more than likely from natural sources. Table I Parametric Trigger values for Groundwater Parameter units Trigger value ( max) Trigger value(min) Ammonium mg/L 0.225 Nitrite mg/L 0.38 Total Oxidised Nitrogen mg/L

(NO3) 37.5

Conductivity Us/cm 800 Ph Ph units 10 4.5 Dissolved Oxygen mg/L

O2 1.0

Chloride mg/L 200 Flouride ug/L 1000 Sodium mg/L 150 Potassium mg/L 10 Boron mg/L 0.75 Copper mg/L 1.5 Cadmium ug/L 3.75 Chromium ug/L 37.5 Arsenic ug/L 7.5 Lead ug/L 10 Nickel ug/L 15 Mercury ug/L 0.75 Total Cyanide ug/L 37.5 VOCs Benzene ug/L 0.75 1,2 dichloroethane ug/L 2.25 Tetra chloroethene and ug/L 7.5

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



Parameter units Trigger value ( max) Trigger value(min) Trichloroethene Toluene ug/L 5 Phenols mg/L 0.05 SVOCs Atrazine ug/L 0.075 Simazine ug/L 0.075 Poly aromatic Hydrocarbons1

ug/L 0.075

Pesticides2,3 ug/L 0.375 1 PAHs neasured should include at least benzo(b)Fluoranthene, benzo(k Fluoranthene, benzo(ghi)perylene,indeno(123-cd)pyrene Fluoranthene 2 the trigger value applies to each individual pesticide measured. 3Pesticides include organic insecticides, Organic herbicides, Organic nematocides, organic acaricides, organic algicides, organic rodenticides, organic slimicides, related products (inter alia, growth regulators

List 1 and List 2 Organics Under the provisions of monitoring requirements, we are required to monitor List 1 and List 2 organic compounds in three groundwater locations on an annual basis. These locations have to be agreed with EPA. In this report we report on four groundwater locations which were monitored for these compounds i.e. Borehole 4, GWML-E3, GWML-E1 and Sugrues well (well on adjoining property to Landfill) The compounds analysed comprised of two types Volatile Organic compounds (VOCs) and Semi Volatile organic compounds (SVOCs). VOCs comprise of organic compounds with boiling points close to or less than that of Water i.e. Petroleum products and common solvents –up to 79 compounds were screened for using Purge and Trap GC MS. Semi Volatile compounds comprise of higher boiling point organics and comprise of classes of compounds such as pesticides, herbicides, PCBs (polychlorinated Biphenyls) and PAHs (Poly aromatic Hydrocarbons). Up to 63 different compounds in this category were screened for. A list of these compounds, together with limits of detection is given in Appendix 2. Original report from contract laboratory is also enclosed

All parameters analysed were below their respective detection limits Heavy Metals As we possess and use *ICP-MS instrument we monitored many more locations for heavy metals than were strictly required i.e. 14 surface water, 6 Leachate, and 8 groundwater locations *Inductively coupled Plasma Mass spectrometer

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS Groundwater

All boreholes are showing evidence of surface water contamination to a greater or lesser extent – borehole 2 been least affected. This is evident from turbidity colour and Total Organic carbon levels. The source of this surface water contamination is undoubtedly exacerbated by rainfall. There was evidence of some contamination in in Borehole 2 in November judging by higher than normal Ammonia and phosphate concentrations but latest results from Feb indicate a return to background levels. Borehole 4 had also momentary spike in ammonia levels in Feb after very heavy rainfall Borehole 5 exhibits evidence of presence of substantial Iron pan judging by high Iron, manganese and even Arsenic results which is a natural occurrence from the bedrock on site. There is stagnant water at borehole 5 and this has shown a rise in ammonia in 2018. Due to a suspected collapse in the borehole, it is not possible to purge the well and it proposed to either remediate the area or install a new well. These works will take place in 2019 Fig 1 Ammonia levels in Borehole 5 between 2014 and 2018

Boreholes GWML E1 and E3, 4 and Sugrues well were tested for list 1, 2 organics. No organic compounds were detected above their respective detection limits Surface water: Impact of Suspended solids: Results from monitoring over last 10 years indicates that most significant threat or impact from Landfill activities in surrounding waters is suspended solids. Samples were obtained “in site monitoring” from Stations SWML 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11 and new lagoon SWMLE1. Suspended solids have declined significantly since 2014 at on-site surface water lagoons (SWMLE1) and SWML 10 in Nov. Figs 4 and 7. No significant levels of Suspended solids were noted.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



In the case of surrounding sites spikes of suspended solids appear occasionally during or after heavy rain. However, in general levels of suspended matter are low There were some suspended solids noted in samples taken in February and November corresponding to high bursts of rainfall High suspended solids in river waters may impair fish spawning grounds particularly in winter and spring. Occasional pulses of suspended matter entering these sites are more than likely the main contributory factor for unsatisfactory biological quality in the past. In the case of O’ Brennan’s bridge it was agreed following unsatisfactory result in 2017 that biological monitoring would be undertaken twice i.e. May and September. The May 2018 result was favorable i.e. Q 4-5. However, by September 2018 this value had deteriorated to 3-4 All other impact sites monitored i.e. E1, N1, G1, G2 Note deterioration in site E2 from Q4 to Q 3 See summary of Biological report in APP 3 An example of suspended solids impact is shown in Fig 2

Impact of Ammonia levels on receiving waters No significant levels of ammonia were recorded in period 2014 to 2018 unlike in 2013, where up to Nov 2013 significant levels were recorded in new lagoon SWML E1 Leachate results There was a low leachate detection in detection manholes monitored LD1 and LD2 but it is negligible by the time it enters LD3

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



Conclusion

Evidence of surface water contamination noted in all boreholes Biological assessment in 2018 denoted waters of good quality in most impact sites

except for W2 at O Brennan’s bridge where a deterioration in status to Q3-5 was noted and E2

No significant levels of Ammonia detected in receiving water sites unlike in earlier years i.e. 2013

References:

1) Summary of Environmental Monitoring requirements For- Kerry Co Council Landfill, Muingnaminnane, Tralee, Co Kerry -Waste Licence Ref No: 1-3: Tobin Consulting Engineers 2) Biological Invertebrate Monitoring of Surface Waters 2012; Laboratory KCC

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

Sathorlann CCC North Kerry Landfill: AER Report 2018: Laboratory Monitoring 26th Mar 2019 KCC Laboratory APP 2: List 1 and List 2 Organic compounds analysed


APPENDIX 1 ; LIST 1, 2 Organics

Appendix1: Details Sampling points referred to in report

Location comments old or alternative name Location Easting

Location Northing

Groundwater

specified groundwater monitoring pts

Groundwater – GWML-E1 94697 117360

Groundwater - BH-2 94814 117306



Groundwater - BH-5 94917.5 117152.7

Groundwater – GWML-E3 94843 117658

Private boreholes adjacent to landfill

borehole: Dennis O Mahony not specified in new licence 97390.7 118348.7

borehole: Gerry Sugrue not specified in new licence 93037.8 116489.5

Leachate

Detection manholes

LD-1 leachate detection manhole 1 94909 117268

LD-2 leachate detection manhole 2 94894 117298

LD-3 leachate detection manhole from lagoon 94905 117264

Lagoon sampling pts

LL-1 Leachate in lagoon 1 94904 117237

LL-2 leachate in Lagoon 2 94927 117166

LL-3 lagoon containing run off from compost 94979 117414

Ancillary pts

Puraflo Treatment Inlet not specified in new licence

Puraflo Treatment Outlet not specified in new licence 94867.2 117332

Wheelwash Not specified in new licence

Surface water

Off site sampling pts

Surface Water sampling point: W1 not specified in new licence biological station 94493.3 117107.5

Surface water sampling point: E2 Not specified in new licence O'Learys farm 95870.6 116575.6

Surface water sampling point: W2 Not specified in new licence 94493.3 117159.9

SW-1 previously E1 95471 117077

SW-2 95143.6 117969.4

SW-3 94853 118263

On site sampling pts

SWML-1 previously 1 94948.3 117376.4

SWML-2 Western Lagoon previously 2 94837.9 117263.7

SWML-3 94866 117221

SWML-4 previously 4 94883.9 117092.6

SWML-5 94911 117027

SWML-10 Eastern lagoon 95092 117470

SWML-11 previously 11 95067 117520

SWML-E1 New surface water lagoon 94592 117510

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



SVOCs: (Semi Volatile base Neutrals) Std Method 6410 B Liquid-Liquid Extraction GC/MS.

VOCs: Std Method 6210 D-Purge and Trap Capillary Column GCMS.Screening per USEPA 524.2 list.

Parameter limit of detection units Parameter

limit of detection units

1.3 - Dichlorobenzene 1 ug/l Dichlorodifluoromethane 10 ug/l

1.4 - Dichlorobenzene 1 ug/l Chloromethane 0.5 ug/l

Hexachloroethane 1 ug/l Ethyl Chloride/Chloroethane 0.5 ug/l

bis(2-Chloroethyl) ether 1 ug/l Vinyl Chloride/Chloroethene *(0.5ppb) 0.5 ug/l

1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1 ug/l Vinyl Chloride/Chloroethene * (25ppb) 0.5 ug/l

bis(2-Chloroisopropyl) ether 1 ug/l Bromomethane 0.5 ug/l

N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine 1 ug/l Trichloromonofluoromethane 0.5 ug/l

Nitrobenzene 1 ug/l Ethyl Ether/Diethyl Ether 0.5 ug/l

Hexachlorobutadiene 1 ug/l 11 Dichloroethene 0.5 ug/l

1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 1 ug/l Acetone 2 ug/l

Isophorone 1 ug/l Iodomethane/Methyl Iodide 0.5 ug/l

Naphthalene 1 ug/l Carbon Disulphide 0.5 ug/lbis(2-Chlororthoxy) methane 1 ug/l Allyl Chloride 0.5 ug/l

Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 1 ug/l Methylene Chloride/DCM 5 ug/l

2-Chloronaphthalene 1 ug/l 2-Propenenitrile/Acrylonitrile 2 ug/l

Acenaphthylene 1 ug/l Chloroacetonitrile 0.5 ug/l

Acenaphthene 1 ug/l Nitrobenzene 0.5 ug/l

Dimethyl phthalate 1 ug/l Propanenitrile 10 ug/l

2,6-Dinitrotoluene 1 ug/l Hexachlorobutadiene 0.5 ug/l

Fluorene 1 ug/l Trans-1,2 Dichloroethene 0.5 ug/l4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether 1 ug/l MtBE 0.5 ug/l

2,4-Dinitrotoluene 1 ug/l 11 Dichloroethane 0.5 ug/l

Diethyl phthalate 1 ug/l 22 Dichloropropane 0.5 ug/l

N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 1 ug/l cis-12 Dichloroethene 0.5 ug/l

Hexachlorobenzene 1 ug/l 2-Butanone 5 ug/l

a-BHC 1 ug/l Methyl Acrylate 5 ug/l4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether 1 ug/l Bromochloromethane 0.5 ug/l

y-BHC 1 ug/l Methacrylonitrile 5 ug/l

Phenanthrene 1 ug/l Tetrahydrofuran 5 ug/l

Anthracene 1 ug/l Chloroform* 1 ug/l

B-BHC 1 ug/l 111 Trichloroethane 0.5 ug/l

Heptachlor 1 ug/l 1-Chlorobutane 0.5 ug/l

d-BHC 1 ug/l Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 ug/l

Aldrin 1 ug/l 11 Dichloropropene 0.5 ug/l

Dibutyl phthalate 1 ug/l Benzene 0.1 ug/l

Heptachlor epoxide 1 ug/l 12 Dichloroethane ) 0.1 ug/l

Endosulfan I 1 ug/l Trichloroethylene/ Trichloroethene 0.1 ug/l

Fluoranthene 1 ug/l 12 Dichloropropane 0.5 ug/l

Dieldrin 1 ug/l Dibromomethane 0.5 ug/l

4,4'-DDE 1 ug/l Methyl Methacrylate 0.5 ug/l

Pyrene 1 ug/l Bromodichloromethane* 2 ug/l

Endrin 1 ug/l 13 Dichloropropene,cis 2 ug/l

Endosulfan II 1 ug/l MIBK/4 Methyl 2 Pentanone 2 ug/l

4,4'-DDD 1 ug/l Toluene 0.5 ug/l

Benzidine 1 ug/l 13 Dichloropropene,trans 2 ug/l

4,4'-DDT 1 ug/l Ethyl Methacrylate 2 ug/l

Endosulfan sulfate 1 ug/l 112 Trichloroethane 0.5 ug/l

Endrin aldehyde 1 ug/l Tetrachloroethylene/ Tetrachloroethene* 0.1 ug/l

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



APPENDIX 1 ; LIST 1, 2 Organics SVOCs: (Semi Volatile base Neutrals) Std Method 6410 B Liquid-Liquid Extraction GC/MS.

VOCs: Std Method 6210 D-Purge and Trap Capillary Column GCMS.Screening per USEPA 524.2 list.

Parameter limit of detection units Parameter

limit of detection units

Butyl benzyl phthalate 1 ug/l Tetrachloroethylene/ Tetrachloroethene* 0.1 ug/l

bis(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate 1 ug/l 13 Dichloropropane 0.5 ug/l

Chrysene 1 ug/l 2-Hexanone 1 ug/l

Benzo(a)anthracene 1 ug/l Dibromochloromethane * 1 ug/l

3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 1 ug/l 12 Dibromoethane 0.5 ug/l

Di-n-octyl phthalate 1 ug/l Chlorobenzene 0.5 ug/l

Benzo(b)fluoranthene 1 ug/l 1112 Tetrachloroethane 2 ug/l

Benzo(k)fluoranthene 1 ug/l Ethyl Benzene 0.5 ug/l

Benzo(a)pyrene 1 ug/l m & p Xylene 0.5 ug/l

Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 1 ug/l o Xylene 0.5 ug/l

Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 1 ug/l Styrene 2 ug/l

Benzo(ghi)perylene 1 ug/l Bromoform * 1 ug/l

N-Nitrosodimethylamine 1 ug/l Isopropyl Benzene 0.5 ug/l

Chlordane 1 ug/l Bromobenzene 0.5 ug/l

Toxapene 1 ug/l 1122 Tetrachloroethane 0.5 ug/l

PCB 1016 1 ug/l 123 Trichloropropane 2 ug/l

PCB 1221 1 ug/l Trans 14 Dichloro 2 Butene, tran 2 ug/l

PCB 1232 1 ug/l Propyl Benzene 0.5 ug/l

PCB 1242 1 ug/l 2-Chlorotoluene 0.5 ug/l

PCB 1248 1 ug/l 4 Chlorotoluene 0.5 ug/l

PCB 1254 1 ug/l 135 Trimethylbenzene 0.5 ug/l

PCB 1260 1 ug/l Tert Butyl Benzene 0.5 ug/l

124 Trimethylbenzene 0.5 ug/l

Sec Butyl Benzene 0.5 ug/l

13 Dichlorobenzene 0.5 ug/l

P Isopropyltoluene 0.5 ug/l



N Butyl Benzene 0.5 ug/l

Hexachloroethane 5 ug/l

12 Dibromo 3 Chloropropane 2 ug/l

124 Trichlorobenzene 0.5 ug/l

Napththalene 2 ug/l

123 Trichlorobenzene 0.5 ug/l

Toluene 0.5 ug/l

13 Dichloropropene,trans 2 ug/l

Ethyl Methacrylate 2 ug/l

112 Trichloroethane 0.5 ug/l

Tetrachloroethylene/ Tetrachloroethene* 0.1 ug/l

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15


Biological Invertebrate Monitoring

Of

Surface Waters

Draining North Kerry Landfill

2018

Laboratory KCC C Markey, Iona McGloin Date of report: Sept 2018

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15


Subject: Biological Assessment of impact sites at North Kerry landfill. Date: September 2018 Introduction: Under the EPA License granted to North Kerry Landfill at Muingnaminnane surface waters draining the landfill are continually monitored. Condition 9.9 of the license requires biological assessment to be carried out annually. Seven sites are included for assessment as follows: W1, W2, E1, E2, G1, G2 and N1 (See Map app a). Biological Q Rating: The samples were classified using the Biological Quality Rating System for Rivers (Q Rating System) as outlined by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Biological Quality Rating System for Rivers (Q ratings) ranges from Q1 to Q5 where a Q5 denotes a pristine river and Q1 indicates serious pollution (see Quality Rating Table below). From the point of view of the Water Framework Directive all rivers and streams must be at least Good status i.e. Q4. High status river stations are not allowed to deteriorate. There are different classifications for depositing and eroding substrates. The Q system is aimed particularly at larger streams and rivers and is carried out between May and September. Three-minute kick samples are carried out at each station accompanied by stone examinations and weed sweeps.

Table 1: Q Status Rating vs. Water Framework Directive (WFD) Quality status Biotic Index Water Quality WFD Quality Status Q5 pristine

High Q4-5 Very goodQ4 Good GoodQ3-4 Slightly Polluted ModerateQ3 Moderately Polluted

Poor Q2-3 Moderate to PoorQ2 PoorQ1-2 Poor to badQ1 Bad

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

App 3 AER; North Kerry Landfill: Invertebrate Monitoring report


Results Table 1: Biological Q Rating

Biological Station Lab Ref No Date Result: Q value

W1 Inaccessible ------ Inaccessible

W2 2018/1491 30/05/2018 4-5

W2 2018/2847 19/09/2018 3-4

E1 2018/2848 19/09/2018 4-5

E2 2018/2849 19/09/2018 3

G1 2018/2894 25/09/2018 4-5

G2 Inaccessible ------- Inaccessible

N1 2018/2895 25/09/2018 4-5

Ivy Bridge 2018/2850 19/09/2018 4-5

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



Table 2: Chemical Results

Discussion: W1 biological station drains the western side of North Kerry Landfill. It is a very small stream just downstream of the landfill and a tributary of the river Lee. The terrain is very steep, the stream is very narrow and the water flows over a series of small falls. When last sampled. In September 2014 this site was found to be inaccessible due to (i) A new high wire fence with barbed wire on top running the length of the stream. (ii) Trees and bushes cut down and allowed to fall over the stream. The situation remains the same in September 2018.Therefore this station could not be sampled. W2: NKL Biological station W2 is at O’Brennan’s Bridge on the River Lee approximately 3km downstream of W1. It drains the Western side of the landfill including many of the surface water drains. This Station was sampled twice in 2018. May 2018: In May this site merits a Q value of 4-5 denoting very good quality and a high WFD quality status. Four A group species were found in numerous abundance. Group C is abundant but mainly due to Baetis rhodani with low numbers and good diversity of other Group C species. The tolerant Group D and E are absent and scarce respectively.

SuspendedSolids NH4 pH Cond DO Temp TON MRP

Fe

N O2 N P

Max. -- 9 -- 15 -- -- --

Target -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Min. -- 6 -- 5 -- -- --

Location Lab Ref no. Date mg/l mg/l pH units µS/cm mg/l

Degrees C mg/l mg/l

µg/l

W1 Inaccessible --- ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ------ --- W2 2018/2847 19/09/2018 4 <0.05 7.1 138 9.8 12.6 <0.5 0.01 457 E1 2018/2848 19/09/2018 4 <0.05 6.6 86 8.97 11.9 <0.5 0.01 1513E2 2018/2849 19/09/2018 1 <0.05 5.3 68 9.97 12.0 <0.5 0.04 1678G1 2018/2894 25/09/2018 26 <0.05 6.8 87 11.1 10.2 <0.5 0.01 1303G2 Inaccessible --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

N1 2018/2895 25/09/2018 4 <0.05 6.7 92 10.7 10.9 <0.5 0.01 1095Ivy Br 2018/2850 19/09/2018 3 <0.05 6.4 76 10.2 12.2 <0.5 0.01 1051

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



September 2018: In September this site merited a Q rating of 3-4 denoting a WFD quality status of “Moderate” and “slightly polluted” water quality. The reasonably good representation of Group A (two species in fair numbers) is offset by the abundance rating of “Superabundant /Excessive” for Group C. This is mainly due to the numbers of Simuliidae and Baetis rhodani present. Simuliidae make up 60% of Group C. This is a significant dominance. There is an overall decrease in Group A from 33% in May to 6% in September and an increase in Group C from 51% to 79% in the same period. Group D and E are scarce and absent respectively. E1 biological station is a small stream draining the Eastern side of the landfill. It runs through bog land. It merits a Q4-5 indicating very good water quality and a High WFD Quality status. There are four Group A species in an abundance category of “Numerous/Abundance”. Group C are represented by six species with low numbers of each and the tolerant Group D and E are absent. This site is of very high-quality veering on the high side of the Q4-5. E2 biological station also drains the Eastern side of the landfill. It is a tributary of the Smearlagh River. It obtains a Q3 indicating a poor WFD Quality status. Group A is absent. There is low diversity with 64% of the species present being made up of Baetis rhodani (33%) and Simuliidae (31%) both of which belong to Group C. The pH at this site is acidic at 5.3 and invertebrate abundance tends to be lower for the entire community at pH values less than 6. Group A Ephemeroptera (Mayfly) species are one of the most sensitive groups of aquatic insects to low pH, Plecoptera (Stoneflies) and Trichoptera (Caddisflies) are generally less sensitive. The high iron reading of 1678ug/l found at E2 combined with the low pH may contribute to the low diversity and density found here. G1 The Glashoreag River drains the Northern side of the landfill. G1 biological station is on the Glashoreag River upstream of the Northern stream confluence. It scores a Q4-5 rating which indicates very good quality and a “High” WFD quality status. Four A group species were found in “Numerous” abundance. The more tolerant and diverse C group are abundant in numbers but mainly due to Baetis rhodani and the tolerant D and E groups are absent. These factors are significant in its rating. N1 biological station is situated on a small stream which drains forestry on the northern side of the landfill. For the purposes of this report it will be referred to as the Northern Stream. It is a tributary of the Glashoreag River, its confluence lying between biological stations G1 and G2. It scores a biological Q rating of 4-5 indicating very good water quality and a high WFD quality status. Two Group A species in “Common/Numerous” abundance, Group C abundant with good diversity and a total absence of Groups D and E were found. G2 biological station is located on the Glashoreag River downstream of the N1 confluence. Access is through private land densely planted with trees with a heavy overgrown ditch at the access point to the river. It has always been a difficult site to access but has become inaccessible due to increased growth in the last four years. Due to this it could not be

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



sampled in 2016, 2017 or this year 2018. It was decided in 2016 to sample further downstream at Ivy Bridge. Ivy Bridge: The Glashoreag River at Ivy Bridge is further downstream of G2 and upstream of the confluence with the River Smearlagh. It scores a biological Q rating of 4-5 indicating very good water quality and a high WFD quality status. Three Group A species in “Numerous” abundance coupled with a good spread of low numbers in the more diverse Group C and the total absence of Group D and E are indicative of the high score obtained.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



Table 3 Q values 2011 to 2018 Sampling

StationDate Q value

30/05/2018 NA*

21/09/2017 NA*

20/09/2016 NA*

10/06/2013 3

17/09/2012 4

22/05/2012 3‐4

03/08/2011 3

19/09/2018 3‐4

30/05/2018 4‐5

21/09/2017 3‐4

20/09/2016 4

16/09/2014 4

04/06/2013 4‐5

17/09/2012 4‐5

21/05/2012 4‐5

19/09/2018 4‐5

21/09/2017 4‐5

20/09/2016 4‐5

16/09/2014 4‐5

10/06/2013 4‐5

17/09/2012 4‐5

19/09/2018 3

21/09/2017 4

20/09/2016 3‐4

16/09/2014 3

04/06/2013 3‐4

19/09/2012 3‐4

25/09/2018 4‐5

25/09/2017 4‐5

22/09/2016 4‐5

17/09/2014 4

18/06/2013 4

18/09/2012 4‐5

19/09/2018 NA*

25/09/2017 NA*

22/09/2016 NA*

17/09/2014 3‐4

18/06/2013 4

18/09/2012 4‐5

25/09/2018 4‐5

21/09/2017 4‐5

22/09/2016 4

17/09/2014 3

18/06/2013 3‐4

18/09/2012 3‐4

19/09/2018 4‐5

21/09/2017 4‐5

22/09/2016 4

N1

Ivy

Bridge

W1

W2

E1

E2

G1

G2

* NA not accessible

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15



Conclusion: W1 Biological Station is inaccessible. E1 Biological station is of very high quality and has retained its Q4-5 biotic index. E2 Biological station has obtained a Q 3 and has dropped in quality from a Q4 in 2017. W2 Biological station merited a Q4-5 in May and a Q3-4 in September. There is a marked deterioration between May and September. G1 Biological station on the Glashoreag river has retained its Q 4-5 biological rating. N1 Biological station has retained its Q 4-5 biological rating. G2 Biological station inaccessible. Ivy Bridge on the Glashoreag river has retained its Q4-5 biological rating.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

Sathorlann CCC North Kerry Landfill: AER Report 2018: Laboratory Monitoring KCC Laboratory APP 2: 2018 - Invertebrate report summary


Appendix A: Map of Sampling Stations

For in

spec

tion p

urpo

ses o

nly.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:15

of 31

Ground Water, Surface Water and Leachate Results – North Kerry Landfill 2018

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

Analysis 001_COLOUR 002_TURBIDITY

003_ODOUR 011_TOTAL_HARDNESS

013C_BOD_ATU

014_COD 015_TOC

Parameter Colour Turbidity Odour Total Hardness

B.O.D. C.O.D. TOC

Reported NameMin. Value 0 4.5 6.0 0 0Max Value 25.00 9.0 9.0 800 5 0.051

Units HAZEN NTU NONE DEG_C DEG_C PH PH PH USCM USCM MGCACO3L BOD BOD BOD MGL MGL MGLN MGLNProduct Project SAMPLING

POINTSampling Point Sample No. Sampled Date Sampled Time Sampled By

North_Kerry_Landfill Groundwater :Borehole No 2

2018/0602 28-Feb-18 11:35 AS 29 4.80 Not Detected 7.9 5.5 161 29.0 <1.0 <0.05


2018/1651 14-Jun-18 14:30 TS 10 5.40 Not Detected 10.4 5.4 158 48.0 <1.0 <0.05


2018/0603 28-Feb-18 12:45 TS 180 31.80 Normal 4.0 6.4 361 13.0 1.5 <0.05


2018/1652 14-Jun-18 12:52 TS 200 8.60 Not Detected 15.4 6.9 353 168.0 2.5 0.07


2018/0604 28-Feb-18 12:40 ML 37 4.38 Not Detected 7.7 6.2 216 13.0 5.6 0.41


2018/1653 14-Jun-18 11:43 TS 16 4.29 Not Detected 9.8 6.0 184 70.0 2.2 <0.05


2018/0605 28-Feb-18 12:25 TS


2018/1654 14-Jun-18 12:45 TS 1800 396.00 Metallic 10.8 7.3 119 70.0 6.4 <0.05


2018/0606 28-Feb-18 11:50 TS 120 31.20 Normal 7.1 5.8 130 37.0 <1.0 <0.05


2018/1655 14-Jun-18 13:25 TS 150 30.70 Not Detected 11.6 6.1 133 44.0 1.1 0.11

North_Kerry_Landfill Groundwater :GWML E1

2018/0601 28-Feb-18 11:40 AS 2700 588.00 Not Detected 8.7 6.9 259 100.0 5.6 <0.05


2018/1650 14-Jun-18 11:30 TS 25000 3.68 Not Detected 11.2 6.6 217 69.0 2.5 <0.05

North_Kerry_Landfill Groundwater :Dennis O'Mahony

2018/0607 28-Feb-18 13:05 AS 80 4.02 Not Detected 4.4 5.6 97 29.0 4.3 <0.05


2018/1656 14-Jun-18 11:55 ML 100 18.82 Not Detected 13.4 5.9 121 74.0 4.9 0.07

North_Kerry_Landfill Groundwater :Gerry Sugrue

2018/0608 28-Feb-18 11:01 AS


2018/1657 14-Jun-18 13:27 ML <5 0.36 Not Detected 18.8 6.2 184 70.0 10.0 <0.05

North_Kerry_Landfill Leachate: LD-1

2018/0609 28-Feb-18 13:50 TS Leachate 7.7 6.3 270 3.1 19 4.48


2018/1663 14-Jun-18 13:05 TS Leachate 12.8


2018/0610 28-Feb-18 14:05 TS Normal 9.5 7.2 379 <1.3 <10 0.08


2018/1664 14-Jun-18 14:00 TS Stale 11.6


2018/0611 28-Feb-18 14:25 TS Normal 4.9 7.7 730 <1.3 <10 0.22


2018/1665 14-Jun-18 14:10 TS Not Detected 13.5

North_Kerry_Landfill Leachate: LL 1

2018/0612 28-Feb-18 14:45 TS Leachate 3.3 7.6 1660 8.8 118 97.40


2018/0802 21-Mar-18 11:35 TS Leachate 7.5 7.4 2030 8.7 149 115.40


2018/1615 13-Jun-18 11:40 TS Leachate 16.4 7.7 1841 186 86.30


2018/2476 22-Aug-18 12:15 ML Not Detected 18.8 7.8 2640 252 143.40


2018/0613 28-Feb-18 14:55 TS Leachate 3.0 7.8 2750 9.0 255 187.80


2018/0803 21-Mar-18 13:22 TS Leachate 10.0 7.7 3330 22 351 260.00


2018/1623 13-Jun-18 12:30 TS Leachate 15.3 7.9 2430 356 129.60


2018/2484 22-Aug-18 14:40 ML Pungent 20.3 8.3 2290 433 10.20

North_Kerry_Landfill Surface water: SW-1

2018/0223 29-Jan-18 14:55 TS Normal 7.4


2018/0586 28-Feb-18 12:40 AS Not Detected 1.3 7.0 131 1.4 16 <0.05


2018/0820 23-Mar-18 11:36 ML Normal 5.9


2018/1180 30-Apr-18 13:15 AS Not Detected 9.5


2018/1498 01-Jun-18 11:22 AS Not Detected 14.0


2018/1638 14-Jun-18 11:30 ML Not Detected 1.8 4.0 90 <1.3 160 <0.05


2018/2189 31-Jul-18 12:07 AS Not Detected 10.5


2018/2611 30-Aug-18 12:32 ML Normal 14.0 7.4 148 <1.3 42 <0.05


2018/2625QA 30-Aug-18 12:33 ML Normal 14.7 7.5 150 <1.3 35 0.05


2018/0224 29-Jan-18 15:05 TS Normal 7.6


2018/0587 28-Feb-18 12:30 ML


2018/0588 28-Feb-18 12:17 ML Normal 2.6 7.0 126 1.3 <10 <0.05


2018/0821 23-Mar-18 11:22 ML Normal 6.0




2018/1499 01-Jun-18 11:15 AS


2018/1639 14-Jun-18 12:20 ML Not Detected 13.4 5.8 64 1.4 142 <0.05


2018/2190 31-Jul-18 11:56 AS


2018/2612 30-Aug-18 12:52 ML


2018/0225 29-Jan-18 14:45 TS Normal 7.8


2018/0822 23-Mar-18 11:28 ML Normal 6.3






2018/1640 14-Jun-18 12:57 ML Not Detected 13.6 6.2 66 1.9 86 <0.05




2018/2613 30-Aug-18 13:15 ML Normal 14.5 6.7 88 1.3 55 <0.05

North_Kerry_Landfill Surface water: SWML-10(Eastern Lagoon outlet)

2018/0230 29-Jan-18 13:10 TS Normal 8.5 <0.05


2018/0593 28-Feb-18 12:40 TS Normal 3.2 7.0 213 <1.3 14 <0.05


2018/0826 23-Mar-18 13:26 ML Normal 7.0 <0.05


2018/1187 30-Apr-18 12:01 AS Not Detected 9.5 <0.05


2018/1192QA 30-Apr-18 12:01 AS Not Detected 9.5 <0.05


2018/1505 01-Jun-18 11:40 AS Not Detected 15.0 <0.05


2018/1645 14-Jun-18 11:45 TS Not Detected 14.1 7.3 186 1.9 44 0.05


2018/2196 31-Jul-18 12:52 AS Not Detected 13.0 <0.05


2018/2618 30-Aug-18 14:10 ML Normal 15.6 7.8 250 <1.3 30 <0.05

North_Kerry_Landfill Surface water: SWML-11

2018/0231 29-Jan-18 13:15 TS Normal 8.3 <0.05


2018/0594 28-Feb-18 12:50 TS Normal 2.6 7.4 215 <1.3 <10 <0.05


2018/0827 23-Mar-18 13:41 ML Normal 7.2 <0.05




2018/1506 01-Jun-18 11:42 AS


2018/1646 14-Jun-18 11:55 TS Not Detected 14.5 7.4 184 2.7 45 <0.05


2018/2619 30-Aug-18 14:13 ML

North_Kerry_Landfill Surface water: SWML-2(Western Lagoon outlet)

2018/0226 29-Jan-18 12:15 TS Normal 8.9 <0.05


2018/0589 28-Feb-18 11:20 TS Normal 2.3 7.0 240 1.5 11 <0.05


2018/0600QA 28-Feb-18 11:25 AS Not Detected 2.3 7.3 240 1.7 <10 <0.05


2018/0823 23-Mar-18 12:44 ML Normal 6.4 <0.05




2018/1501 01-Jun-18 11:55 AS Not Detected 15.0 0.06






2018/2614 30-Aug-18 13:41 ML Normal 17.2 8.6 209 1.3 18 <0.05


2018/0227 29-Jan-18 12:30 TS Normal 8.7 <0.05


2018/0590 28-Feb-18 11:35 TS




2018/1502 01-Jun-18 11:46 AS Musty 16.0


2018/1642 14-Jun-18 12:05 TS Not Detected 12.9 7.5 241 <1.3 25 <0.05


2018/2193 31-Jul-18 13:07 AS


2018/2195 31-Jul-18 13:33 AS


2018/2615 30-Aug-18 13:43 ML


2018/0228 29-Jan-18 12:45 TS Normal 10.3


2018/0591 28-Feb-18 11:50 TS


2018/0824 23-Mar-18 13:02 ML Normal 8.0








2018/2194 31-Jul-18 13:20 AS


2018/2616 30-Aug-18 13:48 ML


2018/0229 29-Jan-18 12:55 TS Normal 8.6


2018/0592 28-Feb-18 12:10 TS


2018/0825 23-Mar-18 13:17 ML Normal 7.3


2018/1186 30-Apr-18 12:41 AS Metallic 11.0






2018/2197 31-Jul-18 13:33 AS


2018/2617 30-Aug-18 13:54 ML

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO


NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_SWML5







\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Aug\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Sep\20


\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Feb\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Apr\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Jun\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Jun\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Aug\20

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO


\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Feb\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Mar\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Apr\20


\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Aug\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Sep\20



\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Jun\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Jun\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Jun\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Aug\20



\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Feb\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Mar\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Apr\20



NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_SW3





\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO




SURF_WATER North Kerry Landfill



NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_LL2


NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_LD3








LEACHATE North Kerry Landfill

NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_OMAHONY


NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_SUGRUE


NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_BH6


NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_GWML_E1









COA Link

GRD_WATER North Kerry Landfill NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_BH2


0

AmmoniaTemperature pH Conductivity B.O.D.

005A_TEMP_FIELD 006_PH 007A_CONDUCTIVITY20C 013C_BOD 022K_AMMONIA

Kerry County Council - All Laboratory Results Report (Environment)* Please note that in accordance with Quality assurance procedures some of this data may be

provisional and may be subject to further revision. This data is not validated until issued in report form signed by Senior Executive Chemist or another approved signatory

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

Kerry County Council - All Laboratory Results Report (Environment)* Please note that in accordance with Quality assurance procedures some of this data may be

provisional and may be subject to further revision. This data is not validated until issued in report form signed by Senior Executive Chemist or another approved signatory

North_Kerry_Landfill Surface water: SWML-E1(Northern Lagoon)

2018/0235 29-Jan-18 14:30 TS Normal 8.5 <0.05


2018/0597 28-Feb-18 12:00 AS Not Detected 2.1 7.6 273 1.7 <10 <0.05


2018/0830 23-Mar-18 12:20 ML Normal 6.5 <0.05




2018/1509 01-Jun-18 11:32 AS Not Detected 18.5 0.07


2018/1649 14-Jun-18 13:40 TS Not Detected 17.3 7.8 167 1.8 18 0.10




2018/2201QA 31-Jul-18 12:40 AS Not Detected 15.0 <0.05


2018/2622 30-Aug-18 13:31 ML Normal 17.5 8.1 159 <1.3 19 <0.05

North_Kerry_Landfill Surface water: W1

2018/0232 29-Jan-18 15:20 TS Normal 7.7


2018/0595 28-Feb-18 13:30 TS Normal 2.4 7.6 112 <1.3 <10 <0.05


2018/0828 23-Mar-18 11:00 ML Normal 6.0










2018/2620 30-Aug-18 12:20 ML Normal 13.9 7.2 101 <1.3 25 <0.05

North_Kerry_Landfill Surface water: W2(O'Brennan's Br. R.Lee)

2018/0233 29-Jan-18 15:30 TS Normal 8.3


2018/0234QA 29-Jan-18 15:33 TS Normal 8.3


2018/0596 28-Feb-18 10:52 AS 1.7 7.4 143 1.6 <10 <0.05


2018/0829 23-Mar-18 10:35 ML Normal 7.2


2018/0831QA 23-Mar-18 10:35 ML Normal 7.2




2018/1508 01-Jun-18 12:36 AS Not Detected 16.0 <0.05


2018/1510QA 01-Jun-18 12:36 AS Not Detected 16.0






2018/2621 30-Aug-18 14:35 ML Normal 13.6 7.3 126 <1.3 20 <0.05\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20

NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_W2

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20




\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Aug\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Aug\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Sep\20

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Apr\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Jun\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Jun\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Aug\20

NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_SWMLE1

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Feb\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Apr\20

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

Analysis 001_COLOUR 002_TURBIDITY

003_ODOUR 008_BIOL_ASSESS

011_TOTAL_HARDNESS

013C_BOD_ATU

014_COD 015_TOC 016_FLUORIDE_ISE

Parameter Colour Turbidity Odour Biological Q Rating

Total Hardness

B.O.D. C.O.D. TOC Fluoride

Reported NameMin. Value 0 4.5 6.0 0Max Value 25.00 9.0 9.0 800 0.051 0.1

Units HAZEN NTU NONE DEG_C DEG_C PH PH PH USCM USCM NONE MGCACO3L BOD MGL MGL MGL_F MGLN MGLN MGLNProduct Project SAMPLING

POINTSampling Point Sample No. Sampled Date Sampled Time Sampled By


2018/2719 06-Sep-18 14:35 ML 15 8.60 Not Detected 11.3 5.7 154 1.4 <0.05


2018/3571 27-Nov-18 11:55 TS 12 1.40 Normal 10.0 5.6 158 26.0 2.7 <0.1 0.27




2018/3572 27-Nov-18 13:45 TS <5 0.34 Normal 12.4 6.5 389 174.0 2.8 0.1 <0.05


2018/2721 06-Sep-18 11:45 ML 7 1.38 Not Detected 10.8 6.1 185 <1.0 <0.05


2018/3573 27-Nov-18 13:16 TS 7 1.02 Normal 9.4 6.1 178 35.0 2.2 0.1 <0.05




2018/3574 27-Nov-18 12:15 TS 2250 335.00 Metallic 10.5 6.0 205 24.0 18.8 <0.1 0.66


2018/2723 06-Sep-18 14:15 ML 19 4.28 Not Detected 12.9 6.3 146 1.8 0.21


2018/3575 27-Nov-18 12:30 TS <5 0.46 Normal 9.6 5.7 134 40.0 1.5 <0.1 <0.05




2018/3569 27-Nov-18 11:35 TS 16 1.99 Normal 11.4 6.3 194 67.0 6.1 <0.1 <0.05


2018/2724 06-Sep-18 12:30 ML 144 11.30 Not Detected 13.9 6.0 113 8.6 0.06


2018/3568 27-Nov-18 12:26 AS 78 5.21 Not Detected 8.5 5.9 94 118.0 6.6 <0.1 <0.05


2018/2725 06-Sep-18 11:15 ML 5 0.57 Normal 14.2 6.1 177 1.0 <0.05


2018/3557 27-Nov-18 12:25 ML <5 <0.25 Normal 10.3 6.0 198 76.0 2.2 <0.1 <0.05


2018/2726 06-Sep-18 13:20 ML Not Detected 12.0


2018/3577 27-Nov-18 14:30 TS Leachate 9.2 6.4 365 1.7 34 <0.1 9.40


2018/2727 06-Sep-18 13:35 ML Not Detected 12.8


2018/3578 27-Nov-18 14:40 TS Normal 10.7 6.9 465 <1.3 20 <0.1 0.57



2018/3579 27-Nov-18 14:50 TS Normal 8.5 7.5 801 <1.3 11 <0.1 <0.05



2018/3580 27-Nov-18 15:00 TS Leachate 8.3 7.4 1793 11 189 <0.1 100.00



2018/3581 27-Nov-18 15:15 TS Leachate 7.4 7.8 3250 31 356 <0.1 222.00

NORT_KERRY_LANDFILL_TONREAGH_GORTNALEAHA BR

North_Kerry_Landfill Surface water: Tonreagh Lower at Gortnaleaha Bridge

2018/3553 27-Nov-18 11:25 ML Normal 8.8 7.0 139 3.4 55 0.18

NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_E1

North_Kerry_Landfill Biological stn E1

2018/2848 19-Sep-18 12:50 IMCG 11.9 6.6 86 4-5 <0.05

NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_E2

North_Kerry_Landfill Biological stn E2

2018/2849 19-Sep-18 14:45 IMCG 12.0 5.3 68 3 <0.05

NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_G1

North_Kerry_Landfill Biological stn G1

2018/2894 25-Sep-18 10:40 IMCG 336 10.2 6.8 87 4-5 <0.05

NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_G2

North_Kerry_Landfill Biological stn G2

2018/2850 19-Sep-18 15:48 IMCG 12.2 6.4 76 4-5 <0.05

North_Kerry_Landfill Surface water: Lee at Crag Bridge

2018/2728 06-Sep-18 10:55 ML Normal 14.0 0.30

North_Kerry_Landfill Surface water: Lee at Crag Bridge

2018/3554 27-Nov-18 11:40 ML Normal 8.7 7.0 105 4.9 79 0.43

NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_N1

North_Kerry_Landfill Biological stn N1

2018/2895 25-Sep-18 12:20 IMCG 348 10.9 6.7 92 4-5 <0.05


2018/2921 28-Sep-18 11:15 ML Normal 9.7


2018/2933QA 28-Sep-18 11:17 ML Normal 9.5


2018/3249 01-Nov-18 13:30 AS Not Detected 6.5


2018/3261QA 01-Nov-18 13:30 AS Not Detected 6.5


2018/3559 27-Nov-18 11:43 AS Not Detected 7.9 5.3 59 1.9 123 <0.05


2018/2922 28-Sep-18 11:39 ML


2018/2991 03-Oct-18 12:48 ML Normal 13.7 69




2018/3560 27-Nov-18 11:31 AS Not Detected 8.1 4.0 98 <1.3 156 <0.05


2018/2923 28-Sep-18 12:15 ML Normal 10.3






2018/2928 28-Sep-18 13:20 ML Normal 12.2


2018/3256 01-Nov-18 13:55 AS Not Detected 6.5 <0.05




2018/2929 28-Sep-18 13:20 ML


2018/3257 01-Nov-18 13:57 AS




2018/2729 06-Sep-18 14:05 ML <0.05


2018/2799 14-Sep-18 15:50 EX_PJMA <0.05


2018/3096 09-Oct-18 15:45 EX_PJMA <0.05






2018/2925 28-Sep-18 12:39 ML






2018/2926 28-Sep-18 12:50 ML


2018/3254 01-Nov-18 14:20 AS




2018/2927 28-Sep-18 12:56 ML






2018/2932 28-Sep-18 13:40 ML Normal 12.8




2018/3576 27-Nov-18 12:45 TS Normal 7.3 6.8 159 <1.3 25 <0.05


2018/2930 28-Sep-18 11:00 ML Normal 10.5




2018/3558 27-Nov-18 13:05 ML Normal 7.9 6.2 56 2.1 93 <0.05


2018/2847 19-Sep-18 11:10 IMCG 12.6 7.1 138 3-4 <0.05




2018/3555 27-Nov-18 11:57 ML Normal 8.7 7.0 91 1.9 66 <0.05

007A_CONDUCTIVITY20C 022K_AMMONIA

Kerry County Council - All Laboratory Results Report (Environment)

* Please note that in accordance with Quality assurance procedures some of this data may be provisional and may be subject to further revision. This data is not validated until issued in report

form signed by Senior Executive Chemist or another approved signatory

Page 1 of 1

Temperature pH

005A_TEMP_FIELD 006_PH

Conductivity Ammonia

0



COA Link

GRD_WATER North Kerry Landfill NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_BH2






NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_OMAHONY




NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_GWML_E1


NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_SUGRUE


LEACHATE North Kerry Landfill NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_LD1




SURF_WATER North Kerry Landfill




NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_LEE_CRAG_BR






\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRO







\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Oct\201\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Oct\201


\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Sep\20\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Sep\20





NORTH_KERRY_LANDFILL_SWMLE1

\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Oct\201\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20




\\doc_server\coa\KCC_ENVIRON\2018\Dec\20



For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

of 31

Appendix C: Gas Model Review

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

Revision: 2 Date:

www.fehilytimoney.ie

Cork.

Prepared by:Fehily Timoney & Co.

Core House,Pouladuff Road,

18 December 2018

North Kerry Gas Model Review

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

DESIGNED: SF CHECKED: TRDATE: 18/12/18 REVISION: 2

JOB NUMBER:

CALC NUMBER:

North Kerry Landfill FILE:

LandGEM Calibration Tool SHEET:

2 18-Dec-18 SF TR CJC


CONSULTANTS IN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Cork : Tel 021-4964133 Fax 021-4964464

PROJECT:

DESCRIPTION:

C:\Users\DAVID~1.DON\AppData\Local\Temp\p1820%20north%20kerry%20gas%20model%20review%20rev%202%2018%20dec%20208.xls-1.xlsm

Calc cover

Rev Date Prepared

P1820

C-01

ApprovedGas calibration tool normalised to 50% and years 2017 and 2018 adjusted in accordance with DD / B9 email dated

CheckedPurpose and Description

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

SF18/12/2018

P1820C-01

Ref. OutputPage 1 of 3 1

1

2

3

45

ii Appendices

1.1 Overview of Gas Calibration Tool1.2. Landfill Gas Prediction Model Limitations1.3 LandGEM Software Support1.4. Example Design Report1.5 Database calculations

2.0. Landfill Gas Review

Appendix 1: Historical Landfill Gas Flow (m3/hr)

Appendix 2: Historical Landfill CH4 (%) Average

ii. Contents

1.0 Introduction & Purpose

A management and auditing model for balancing landfill gas extraction. C. J. Cronin, P. Kelly, E. Hanley, T. Ruddy, J. Smith Proceedings Waste 2008A spread sheet tool to calibrate LANDGEM gas modelling balancing landfill gas extraction. C. J. Cronin, P. Kelly, T. Ruddy, D. Smyth, S. Myler. Proceedings Sardinia 2011.http://www.epa.gov/ttncatc1/products.html (Website Updated as of 2018)KCC gas audit records Email DD dated 12 Dec 2018

DESCRIPTION: LandGEM Calibration Tool SHEET Design Report

i. References

CONSULTANTS IN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

DESIGNED: CHECKED: TRDATE: REVISION: 2

Cork : Tel 021-4964133 Fax 021-4964464

NUMBER:NUMBER:

PROJECT: North Kerry Landfill FILEC:\Users\DAVID~1.DON\AppData\Local\Temp\p1820%20north%20kerry%20gas%20model%20review%20rev%202%2018%20dec%20208.xls-1.xlsm

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16


1.1 Overview of Gas Calibration Tool

Ref 1

Ref 2

1.2. Landfill Gas Prediction Model Limitations

Ref 3

1.3 LandGEM Software Support

http://www.epa.gov/ttncatc1/dir1/landgem-v302-guide.pdfhttp://www.epa.gov/ttncatc1/products.html#software

1.4. Example Design Report

The model make no allowance for waste compositions that differ from average US conditions. Adjustments are therefore required if waste composition of the subject landfill differs from US historical averages. This calibration tool is not suited to residual waste where organic content of the waste may be very low.

The model applies a best fit result for the target date and only selects the five closest curves to that date. The selection does not by default represent the most appropriate curve.

Users when entering flow data must make allowance for fugitive emissions.

The gas prediction tool uses spreadsheets developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency. The manual and software of LandGEM version 3.02 can be obtained from the following web addresses respectively:

Attached is an example of a typical audit report generated by the FTC as balancing software tool

Thereafter the five curves that provide the closest match to the gas extraction flow rate observation at the specified audit date (Table 1.3) are selected and presented graphically in Figure 1.1.

These graphs (Figure 1.1) present prediction model outputs against audit flow records and allow inputs also from one other prediction curve (GasSim or other).

Thereafter the best fit curve from the 5 generated LandGEM curves can be selected (Table 1.7) and the k and Lo values determined for the best fit curve.

The algorithms used to develop the spreadsheet are documented in Ref 2.

The model requires representative audit results over an extended period and on the basis of such produces a best fit curve using LandGEM algorithms.


1.0 Introduction & Purpose

This landfill gas calibration tool is one of a suite of programs developed by FTC designed to facilitate balancing of landfill gas extraction.This tool was developed because historical audits of sites invariably show significant differences between audit results and the theoretical gas prediction curve developed for the facility.This software tool is designed as a validation check when using theoretical gas prediction models. Following inputs of MSW waste and historical gas extraction audit results, algorithms develop a locus of curves using the LandGEM software for respective k and Lo selections.

Typical Audit Report

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16


1.5 Database calculations

Ref 5

This Landfill Gas Review should not be used for Pollutant Release & Transfer Policy (PRTR) as data was provided only from the months of January to September.The results from the Landfill Gas Review will not comply with the (PRTR) annual report for 2018, which is an EPA requirement for all licenced facilities.

The best fit curve for the Year 2015 is Model 5 (illustrated with a purple line) in the LandGEM Landfill Gas Prediction Model. The associated Model data is attached in "8.1E LandGem Model 5" and give an estimate of gas predictions to facilitate PRTR returns

The purpose of the landfill gas review is to update the gas prediction model with the use of historical has flow rate records.

Kerry County Council provided Gas Audits for 2016, 2017 & 2018. Each Gas Audit contained monthly data on the well monitoring of gas extraction at North Kerry.

For the purpose of the gas review, all monthly values of the historical landfill gas flow rate were tabularised and averaged to find an average yearly value that could be inputted into the model. See Appendix 1.

For the purpose of the gas review, all monthly values of the methane content were tabularised and averaged to find an average yearly value that could be inputted into the model. See Appendix 2.

The gas prediction model was trialed with the values of historical landfill gas flow and methane percentage for the years 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 following the instructions of LandGEM Calibration Curve. The best-fit prediction curve was selected.


The curves are created using waste inputs and different factors for k and Lo. These calculations are carried out in the background but if the user wishes to view them they can be unhidden.

Some worksheets are also password protected to prevent inadvertent errors with macros, should the user want to unprotect them the password is 1234

2.0. Landfill Gas Review

Rev 2 flows in 2017 and 2018 were normalised to 50% as advised by Ref 5 email and the model calibration was conducted for 50% methane.

The year 2015 generates the five gas flow prediction curves that represent the best fit of the North Kerry landfill when compared to the values of 2016, 2017 and 2018.

For in

spec

tion p

urpo

ses o

nly.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16


Year Imported Waste Year Hist. LFG

Gas Flow

Other Gas Prediction

model

Capture Factor

Adjusted Gas

Prediction Flow rate

t m3/hr m3/hr m3/hr1994 16,902 1994 75% 01995 23,505 1995 10 75% 0 51996 23,722 1996 30 75% 0 0.35 0.031997 25,582 1997 50 75% 0 35 801998 33,530 1998 60 75% 01999 57,873 1999 90 75% 02000 60,474 2000 110 75% 02001 63,946 2001 120 75% 02002 62,822 2002 155 75% 02003 50,235 2003 200 75% 02004 48,054 2004 240 75% 02005 34,431 2005 270 75% 02006 60,025 2006 280 75% 02007 56,794 2007 320 75% 02008 62,413 2008 350 75% 02009 39,755 2009 370 75% 02010 20,987 2010 380 75% 02011 16,546 2011 147 374 60% 2452012 71,007 2012 139 367 60% 2322013 55,276 2013 255 360 70% 3642014 2014 319 375 80% 3992015 2015 272 365 80% 3402016 2016 265 347 80% 3312017 2017 136 330 80% 1702018 2018 100 316 80% 1252019 2019 303 80% 02020 2020 290 80% 02021 2021 279 80% 02022 2022 268 80% 02023 2023 257 80% 02024 2024 246 80% 02025 2025 235 80% 02026 2026 224 80% 02027 2027 212 80% 02028 2028 200 80% 02029 2029 196 80% 02030 2030 192 80% 02031 2031 186 80% 02032 2032 180 80% 02033 2033 175 80% 02034 2034 168 80% 02035 2035 163 80% 02036 2036 155 80% 02037 2037 145 80% 02038 2038 140 80% 02039 2039 139 80% 02040 2040 1382041 2041 1302042 2042 1252043 2043 120

2044 2044 119 2015 0% k (year-1) Lo (m3/Mg)2045 2045 118 272 60% 0.55 402046 2046 116 10 100% 0.85 502047 2047 110 80% 0.7 452048 2048 105 80% 0.95 552049 2049 102 50% 0.35 35

k=Lo=

Model 5

Table 1.6 - K and Lo for models 1-5

Model 1Model 2Model 3

CONSULTANTS IN ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Core

House, Pouladuff Road, Cork City, Cork, Ireland

Model 4

Table 1.8 - Manual K and Lo Selectionk=Lo=

Table 1.4 - Avg. CH4 Conc. at EnginesEnter CH4 (%v/v)

% of Landfill Capped

pWaste Table 1.2 - Hist. LFG Details

Table 1.3 - Actual LFG Flow at Flares & EnginesEnter Year

Enter Actual Gas Production (m3/hr)Tolerance (m3/yr)

Table 1.7 - Model SelectionEnter Model No:

Capped Landfill Capture Eff.Overall Capture Efficiency

Table 1.5 - LFG Capture Estimate% of Landfill Open

Open Landfill Capture Eff.

-100

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1975 1985 1995 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045

LF

G F

low

(m

3 /h

r)

Fig. 1.1 - LandGEM Landfill Gas Prediction Model

Actual Model 1 Model 2Model 3 Model 4 Model 5Other Gas Prediction model Table 1.8 Manual Inputs

INSTRUCTIONS:NOTE: default data inserted please insert relevant data as instructed below1. Enter Imported Waste tonnage and years in Table 1.1.2. Enter Historical Landfill Gas Flow totals for years up to current year in Table 1.2 including allowance for fugitive emissions.3. Enter details of the measured Landfill Gas Flow to engines and/or flares for current year in Table 1.3.(Table 1.5 adjusts for fugitive emissions).4. Enter average methane content of landfill gas at the engines in Table 1.4.5. Enter landfill gas capture estimate for respective years using tool in Table 1.5.6. Select Update Calibration Curve to update analysis for model curve selection 7. Blue text denotes where inputs are required.8. Select best-fit prediction curve from Fig.1.1 and enter best fit in Table 1.7. This model number curve will be used for PV analysis.9. Table 1.8 allows manual selection of k and Lo.NOTE Default year settings on x axis of Fig 1.1. If dates outside these years are required reformatting of the axis is required

IMPORTANT NOTE:This model is only accurate for methane concentrations between 40 and 60 percent. UsingLandGEM at landfills that have methane content outside the range of 40 to 60 percent is notrecommended. The first-order decomposition rate equation used by LandGEM to determineemissions may not be valid outside of this range.Note also that LandGEM uses waste stream composition based on average of US sites

PV Analysis Cover

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

Model 5-1 Parameters:k = 0.350 year -1

Lo = 35 m 3 /Mg

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021User Waste Acceptance Inputs (Mg/year) 16,902 23,505 23,722 25,582 33,530 57,873 60,474 63,946 62,822 50,235 48,054 34,431 60,025 56,794 62,413 39,755 20,987 16,546 71,007 55,276 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

User Waste-In-Place (Mg) 0 16,902 40,407 64,129 89,711 123,241 181,114 241,588 305,534 368,356 418,591 466,645 501,076 561,101 617,895 680,308 720,063 741,050 757,596 828,603 883,879 883,879 883,879 883,879 883,879 883,879 883,879 883,879

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022Methane Emissions (m 3 /year) 177,773 372,496 511,998 629,867 796,523 1,170,000 1,460,541 1,701,801 1,859,991 1,839,078 1,801,401 1,631,566 1,781,079 1,852,456 1,961,854 1,800,632 1,489,622 1,223,748 1,609,201 1,715,370 1,208,801 851,827 600,273 423,005 298,087 210,058 148,025 104,312

Avg. Total Methane Emission (m 3 /hour) 20.3 42.5 58.4 71.9 90.9 133.5 166.6 194.1 212.2 209.8 205.5 186.1 203.2 211.3 223.8 205.4 169.9 139.6 183.6 195.7 137.9 97.2 68.5 48.3 34.0 24.0 16.9 11.9Avg. Total LFG Emission (m 3 /hour) 40.6 85.0 116.8 143.7 181.7 266.9 333.2 388.3 424.4 419.6 411.0 372.2 406.4 422.6 447.6 410.8 339.9 279.2 367.1 391.4 275.8 194.3 137.0 96.5 68.0 47.9 33.8 23.8Avg. Methane Captured (m 3 /hour) 16.2 34.0 46.7 57.5 72.7 106.8 133.3 155.3 169.7 167.8 164.4 148.9 162.5 169.1 179.0 164.3 135.9 111.7 146.9 156.5 110.3 77.7 54.8 38.6 27.2 19.2 13.5 9.5Avg. Total LFG Captured (m 3 /hour) 32.4 68.0 93.5 115.0 145.4 213.6 266.6 310.6 339.5 335.7 328.8 297.8 325.1 338.1 358.1 328.7 271.9 223.4 293.7 313.1 220.6 155.5 109.6 77.2 54.4 38.3 27.0 19.0WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 1 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

WASTE 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902 16,902EMISSIONS 177,773 125,274 88,279 62,209 43,838 30,892 21,769 15,341 10,810 7,618 5,368 3,783 2,666 1,879 1,324 933 657 463 326 230 162 114 81 57 40 28 20 14

WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 2 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26WASTE 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505 23,505

EMISSIONS 247,222 174,214 122,767 86,512 60,964 42,961 30,274 21,334 15,034 10,594 7,465 5,261 3,707 2,612 1,841 1,297 914 644 454 320 225 159 112 79 56 39 28WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 3 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

WASTE 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722 23,722EMISSIONS 249,504 175,823 123,900 87,311 61,527 43,357 30,553 21,531 15,172 10,692 7,534 5,309 3,741 2,637 1,858 1,309 923 650 458 323 228 160 113 80 56 40

WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 4 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24WASTE 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582 25,582

EMISSIONS 269,068 189,609 133,615 94,157 66,351 46,757 32,949 23,219 16,362 11,530 8,125 5,726 4,035 2,843 2,004 1,412 995 701 494 348 245 173 122 86 61WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 5 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

WASTE 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530 33,530EMISSIONS 352,664 248,518 175,128 123,410 86,966 61,284 43,186 30,433 21,445 15,112 10,650 7,505 5,288 3,727 2,626 1,851 1,304 919 648 456 322 227 160 113

WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 6 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22WASTE 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873 57,873

EMISSIONS 608,700 428,943 302,271 213,007 150,103 105,776 74,539 52,527 37,015 26,084 18,381 12,953 9,128 6,432 4,533 3,194 2,251 1,586 1,118 788 555 391 276WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 7 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

WASTE 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474 60,474EMISSIONS 636,056 448,221 315,856 222,580 156,850 110,530 77,889 54,888 38,679 27,256 19,207 13,535 9,538 6,721 4,736 3,338 2,352 1,657 1,168 823 580 409

WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 8 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20WASTE 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946 63,946

EMISSIONS 672,574 473,955 333,991 235,359 165,855 116,876 82,361 58,039 40,899 28,821 20,310 14,312 10,086 7,107 5,008 3,529 2,487 1,753 1,235 870 613WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 9 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

WASTE 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822 62,822EMISSIONS 660,752 465,624 328,120 231,222 162,940 114,822 80,913 57,019 40,180 28,315 19,953 14,061 9,908 6,982 4,920 3,467 2,443 1,722 1,213 855

WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 10 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18WASTE 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235 50,235

EMISSIONS 528,364 372,332 262,378 184,895 130,293 91,816 64,702 45,594 32,130 22,642 15,955 11,243 7,923 5,583 3,935 2,773 1,954 1,377 970WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 11 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

WASTE 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054 48,054EMISSIONS 505,425 356,167 250,987 176,867 124,636 87,830 61,893 43,615 30,735 21,659 15,263 10,755 7,579 5,341 3,764 2,652 1,869 1,317

WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 12 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16WASTE 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431 34,431

EMISSIONS 362,140 255,196 179,833 126,726 89,303 62,931 44,346 31,250 22,022 15,518 10,936 7,706 5,430 3,827 2,697 1,900 1,339WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 13 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

WASTE 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025 60,025EMISSIONS 631,334 444,894 313,511 220,928 155,685 109,709 77,311 54,480 38,391 27,054 19,065 13,435 9,467 6,671 4,701 3,313

WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 14 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14WASTE 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794 56,794

EMISSIONS 597,351 420,946 296,636 209,036 147,305 103,804 73,149 51,548 36,325 25,598 18,038 12,711 8,958 6,312 4,448WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 15 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

WASTE 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413 62,413EMISSIONS 656,451 462,593 325,984 229,717 161,879 114,074 80,387 56,647 39,919 28,130 19,823 13,969 9,844 6,937

WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 16 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12WASTE 39,755 39,755 39,755 39,755 39,755 39,755 39,755 39,755 39,755 39,755 39,755 39,755 39,755

EMISSIONS 418,137 294,656 207,641 146,322 103,111 72,661 51,204 36,083 25,427 17,918 12,627 8,898 6,270WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 17 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

WASTE 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987EMISSIONS 220,738 155,552 109,615 77,245 54,433 38,359 27,031 19,048 13,423 9,459 6,666 4,697

WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 18 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10WASTE 16,546 16,546 16,546 16,546 16,546 16,546 16,546 16,546 16,546 16,546 16,546

EMISSIONS 174,028 122,636 86,420 60,899 42,915 30,242 21,311 15,018 10,583 7,457 5,255WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 19 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

WASTE 71,007 71,007 71,007 71,007 71,007 71,007 71,007 71,007 71,007 71,007EMISSIONS 746,841 526,290 370,870 261,348 184,169 129,782 91,455 64,448 45,415 32,004

WASTE ADDED IN YEAR 20 YEAR 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8WASTE 55,276 55,276 55,276 55,276 55,276 55,276 55,276 55,276 55,276

EMISSIONS 581,385 409,695 288,707 203,448 143,368 101,030 71,194 50,170 35,354

Model 5-1 Year

Model 5-1 Year

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

Year 2016 Year 2017 Year 2018

BeforeGas Flow(m3/hr)

AfterGas Flow(m3/hr)





Jan 370 230 Jan 155 155 Jan 230 200Feb 325 300 Feb 220 210 Feb 220 200Mar 300 280 Mar 210 190 Mar 210 190Apr 320 305 Apr 200 180 Apr 175 160May 280 270 May 135 125 May 185 170Jun 275 265 Jun 165 155 Jun 150 140Jul 280 270 Jul 210 195 Jul 120 110Aug 310 290 Aug 200 180 Aug 170 160Sep 300 280 Sep 220 205 Sep 180 170Oct 240 225 Oct 180 155 Oct - -Nov 240 230 Nov 200 180 Nov - -Dec 260 240 Dec 250 220 Dec - -

Average 292 265 Average 195 179 Average 182 167

M:\Environmental_Protection\WasteMgt\WasteInfrastructure\NKL\File_400_EPA_Compliance\2019\6. AER\GasReview\P1820 North Kerry Gas Model Review Rev 2 18 Dec 208.xlsm

### Historical Landfill Gas Flow (m3/hr) ###

Flare/Engine Flare/Engine Flare/Engine

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

Year 2016 Year 2017 Year 2018

BeforeMethane

(%)

AfterMethane

(%)

BeforeMethane

(%)

AfterMethane

(%)

BeforeMethane

(%)

AfterMethane

(%)Jan 38 42 Jan 56 56 Jan 29 32Feb 44 46 Feb 33 36 Feb 26 30Mar 43 47 Mar 32 38 Mar 27 29Apr 45 48 Apr 35 37 Apr 28 32May 44 46 May 46 48 May 24 26Jun 45 48 Jun 42 46 Jun 29 30Jul 43 46 Jul 32 34 Jul 43 45Aug 45 48 Aug 33 36 Aug 31 33.6Sep 43 46 Sep 29 32 Sep 28 30Oct 35 39 Oct 36 39 Oct - -Nov 36 37 Nov 41 43 Nov - -Dec 34 36 Dec 30 33 Dec - -

Average 41 44 Average 37 40 Average 29 32

M:\Environmental_Protection\WasteMgt\WasteInfrastructure\NKL\File_400_EPA_Compliance\2019\6. AER\GasReview\P1820 North Kerry Gas Model Review Rev 2 18 Dec 208.xlsm

### Historical Landfill CH 4 (%) Average ###

CH4 (%) CH4 (%) CH4 (%)

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

of 31

Appendix D: Monthly Balancing Records – Gas field

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

NORTH KERRY LANDFILL GAS EXTRACTION WELL MONITORING

Model Serial No 9500132 GA 5000Date: 26/01/2018Weather: Cool/Dry 0998mb

Cell Well CH4 (%) CO2 (%) O2 (%) Balance (%) CO (ppm)Static

Pressure (mb)

Valve Pos (%)

Monitor at wellhead/flowline/manifo

ld (w/f/m)

Comments

Cells 1 1.3 26 20 1 53 1 -1 3% w1.4 23 17 3 57 1 -1 3% w

Cells 2 2.1 16 13 5 66 1 0 3% W Fixed pipe work 2.2 24 15 5 57 1 0 3% w2.3 37 24 1 38 2 -1 3% w

Cells 3 3.2 26 18 3 53 2 -1 3% w3.4 33 18 1 48 1 -1 3% w

Cells 4 4.2 17 16 1 66 2 -42 10% w4.3 36 20 1 43 1 -1 3% w4.4 37 22 2 40 2 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 31 18 2 49 1 -1 3% w5.2 29 17 3 51 1 -1 3% W5.3 22 17 2 59 2 -1 3% W5.4 38 22 1 39 2 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 22 16 4 58 1 0 3% W6.2 29 17 1 53 2 -1 3% w6.3 19 17 5 59 2 -1 3% W Wellhead needs work 6.4 34 22 1 43 1 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 30 17 2 51 2 -1 3% W Need to investigate 7.2 32 20 3 45 1 -1 3% W7.3 31 22 1 46 2 -1 3% W7.4 29 19 3 49 2 -1 3% W7.5

Cells 8 8.1 46 29 1 24 2 -1 3% W8.2 19 15 3 58 1 -2 6% M8.3 32 23 2 43 3 -1 3% W8.4 36 23 3 38 3 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 19 16 4 61 1 -1 3% W9.2 48 29 1 22 3 -48 25% w9.3 11 8 19 63 1 0 1% w9.4 38 30 2 30 2 -48 25% W9.6 34 25 2 39 1 -4 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 25 18 5 52 2 -1 1% w Cap damaged perforated pipe above ground level 10.3 34 25 2 39 1 -49 15% w10.4 36 22 2 40 3 -48 10% w10.5 38 25 1 36 1 -18 30% w10.6 34 21 2 43 1 -2 15% w

Cells 11 1 38 28 2 32 1 -49 20% W2 19 17 13 60 1 -1 1% w To excavate well would require digging up road3 46 32 2 20 3 -3 20% w

Cells 12 1 31 21 2 46 1 -1 10% M Under ground well issue pipe work ok2 37 25 2 36 3 -4 20% M Over pulled gas well3 17 22 1 60 1 -5 0% M4 43 25 3 29 1 -5 5%

Cells 13 1 32 23 3 42 2 -50 100% M2 36 20 2 42 2 -49 25% M3 41 27 1 31 1 -49 90% M4 35 23 2 30 2 -50 95% M5 32 26 2 40 2 -49 15% M6 36 26 1 37 1 -12 1% M

Cells 14 1 29 22 3 46 2 -2 1% M2 43 27 2 28 2 -14 20% M3 36 24 3 37 3 -10 30% M4 38 25 2 35 1 -11 30% M5 25 20 3 52 2 -2 20% M6 38 23 2 37 2 -4 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 31 26 2 41 2 -50 60% W2 28 25 2 45 3 -50 60% W3 29 26 2 43 1 -51 60% W4 28 25 2 45 2 -50 60% W5 30 26 3 42 2 -51 60% W6 42 26 1 31 2 -22 10% W7 39 29 2 30 3 -22 10% W8 28 27 1 44 2 -51 60% W9 27 24 4 45 1 -51 60% W

10 30 26 2 42 2 -50 60% W11 28 25 2 44 4 -51 60% W12 29 24 2 45 1 -50 60% W13 5 6 19 70 1 0 0% W14 24 21 2 53 2 -1 1% W15 43 28 2 27 3 -5 1% W

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

16 17 13 4 66 1 -1 0% W Well closed poor gas will monitor, no issue with pipe work 17 12 10 7 71 1 -1 0% W Well closed poor gas will monitor, no issue with pipe work

Cell17/18New Wells 1 43 32 1 24 2 -6 2%

2 45 32 1 22 1 -7 2%3 43 30 2 25 1 -8 2%

Cell 17 1 22 19 6 53 2 -1 1% W2 27 21 3 49 2 -1 75% W3 24 19 4 53 1 -12 100% W4 32 26 2 40 3 -27 75% W5 25 18 2 55 1 -14 60% W6 28 22 2 48 1 -10 90% W

Cells 18 1 34 31 3 32 2 -51 50% M2 32 30 2 36 1 -51 50% M3 33 29 3 35 3 -50 30% M4 43 33 1 23 2 -51 50% M5 34 27 2 37 3 -51 50% M

Valves 1 22 18 3 57 2 -1 30% 0 Line 12 30 22 2 46 2 -1 30% 0 Line 23 22 19 2 57 2 -54 40% 0 Line 34 33 26 2 39 2 -55 30% 35 Manifold 11/125 31 23 3 43 3 -55 60% 10 Manifold 136 28 23 2 47 1 -55 80% 10 Manifold 147 46 34 1 19 3 -56 30% 35 Mainline cell 158 42 29 3 26 2 -56 80% 40 Cell 9&109 34 29 1 36 1 -55 60% 70 Manifold 17/18

Flare/Engine Before 29 26 3 42 3 -64 230m3hr Gas quality has reduced significantly

Flare/Engine After32 28 1 39 1 -57 200m3hr

Gas quality is holding but suction is increasing gradually. All new gas wells are now connected

Comments: Gasfield is being over extractedGas wells will be dewatered in February

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16


Model Serial No 9500132 GA 5000Date: 27/02/2018

Weather: Cool/Dry 1006mb

Cell Well CH4 (%) CO2 (%) O2 (%)Balance

(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flo

wline/manifo

ld (w/f/m)

Cells 1 1.3 28 20 2 54 2 -1 3% w

1.4 22 15 3 60 1 -1 3% w

Cells 2 2.1 14 12 6 68 1 0 3% W

2.2 13 12 7 68 1 0 3% w

2.3 39 24 1 36 3 -1 3% w

Cells 3 3.2 28 19 2 51 2 -1 3% w

3.4 31 20 1 48 1 -1 3% w

Cells 4 4.2 18 14 2 66 2 -40 10% w

4.3 38 21 1 40 1 -1 3% w

4.4 34 19 3 44 2 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 16 12 8 64 1 0 3% w

5.2 26 14 4 56 1 -1 3% W

5.3 19 15 3 63 2 -1 3% W

5.4 35 20 2 43 2 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 24 16 3 57 1 0 3% W

6.2 31 20 1 48 2 -1 3% w

6.3 16 13 2 69 2 -1 3% W

6.4 31 19 3 47 1 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 32 18 3 47 2 -1 3% W

7.2 30 21 2 47 1 -1 3% W

7.3 33 22 1 44 2 -1 3% W

7.4 26 17 3 54 2 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 44 27 2 27 2 -1 3% W

8.2 25 19 3 53 1 -4 6% M

8.3 28 19 2 51 3 -1 3% W

8.4 32 23 2 43 1 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 21 18 3 58 1 -1 3% W

9.2 44 25 2 29 3 -42 25% w

9.3 16 10 8 66 1 0 1% w

9.4 32 26 2 40 2 -42 25% W

9.6 34 25 2 39 1 -4 1% W

29 21 3.0 47.0 1 -9

Cells 10 10.2 23 15 5 57 1 -1 1% w

10.3 38 26 2 34 1 -40 15% w

10.4 32 19 3 46 2 -41 10% w

10.5 32 21 1 47 1 -9 30% w

10.6 29 19 2 50 2 -3 15% w

Cells 11 1 34 25 2 39 1 -40 20% W

2 16 14 13 57 1 0 1% w

3 16 18 1 65 3 -2 20% w

Cells 12 1 28 18 2 52 1 -1 10% M

2 34 24 1 40 3 -6 20% M

3 16 20 1 63 1 -3 0% M

4 36 23 3 52 1 -3 5%

Cells 13 1 25 21 3 51 2 -41 100% M

2 26 18 2 54 2 -40 25% M

3 31 22 2 45 1 -41 90% M

4 29 19 3 49 2 -40 95% M

5 29 24 2 45 2 -40 15% M

6 31 23 2 44 1 -8 1% M

Cells 14 1 23 16 4 57 2 -1 1% M

2 32 22 2 44 3 -22 20% M

3 32 22 2 44 2 -19 30% M

4 29 22 2 47 1 -22 30% M

5 22 16 3 59 2 -4 20% M

6 34 21 1 46 2 -6 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 42 26 1 31 2 -43 60% W

2 22 19 2 57 1 -42 60% W

3 24 18 2 56 1 -42 60% W

4 52 36 1 11 3 -41 60% W

5 21 18 3 58 4 -40 60% W

6 32 27 3 38 3 -40 10% W

7 19 17 2 62 2 -42 10% W

8 18 16 2 64 2 -41 60% W

9 20 17 4 59 1 -43 60% W

10 28 25 2 45 3 -42 60% W

11 45 33 2 20 2 -43 60% W

12 32 25 2 41 1 -40 60% W

13 8 12 9 71 1 0 0% W

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

14 18 16 2 64 3 -1 1% W

15 24 18 2 56 3 -2 1% W

16 21 18 2 15 2 -1 0% W

17 16 12 4 68 1 -1 0% W

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 23 18 1 58 3 -1 2% W

2 21 18 1 22 1 -1 2% W

3 35 28 2 35 1 -40 2% W

Cell 17 1 17 15 6 62 2 -1 1% W

2 29 24 1 46 2 -1 75% W

3 23 19 3 55 1 -22 100% W

4 34 26 1 39 3 -16 75% W

5 22 16 4 58 1 -22 60% W

6 22 15 3 60 1 -13 90% W

Cells 18 1 32 28 3 37 3 -24 50% M

2 35 32 2 31 1 -6 50% M

3 35 31 2 31 2 -38 30% M

4 38 33 1 28 3 -40 50% M

5 30 26 2 42 3 -39 50% M

Valves 1 19 16 4 61 3 -1 3% 0

2 26 23 2 49 2 -1 3% 0

3 28 22 2 48 2 -48 40% 0

4 22 19 2 57 3 -46 30% 40

5 21 18 3 58 2 -43 60% 12

6 19 16 2 63 1 -44 80% 14

7 23 21 1 55 3 -45 30% 30

8 25 21 4 50 2 -42 80% 40

9 36 30 1 33 1 -40 60% 65

10

Flare/Engine Before 26 23 2 49 4 -57 220m3hr

Flare/Engine After30 26 1 43 2 -48 200m3hr

Comments: Gasfield is being over extractedGas wells in Cells 13& 14 dewatered in February but have all recharged

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16





(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flo

wline/manifo

ld (w/f/m)

Cells 1 1.3 25 18 3 54 3 -1 3% w

1.4 19 16 3 62 2 -1 3% w

Cells 2 2.1 12 14 7 67 1 0 3% W

2.2 15 13 8 64 2 0 3% w

2.3 32 20 2 46 1 -1 3% w

Cells 3 3.2 27 18 3 52 1 -1 3% w

3.4 33 21 2 44 2 -1 3% w

Cells 4 4.2 17 15 1 67 3 -33 10% w

4.3 36 20 2 42 1 -1 3% w

4.4 30 20 2 48 3 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 14 10 9 67 2 0 3% w

5.2 28 16 3 53 1 -1 3% W

5.3 21 16 3 60 2 -1 3% W

5.4 33 21 1 45 1 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 20 14 5 61 1 0 3% W

6.2 29 18 3 50 2 -1 3% w

6.3 19 15 2 64 1 -1 3% W

6.4 34 21 2 43 1 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 28 16 4 52 1 -1 3% W

7.2 31 22 2 45 1 -1 3% W

7.3 30 21 2 47 3 -1 3% W

7.4 29 19 3 49 2 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 47 29 2 22 3 -1 3% W

8.2 21 15 4 60 1 -5 6% M

8.3 30 21 2 47 3 -1 3% W

8.4 28 19 3 50 2 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 19 16 5 60 1 0 3% W

9.2 40 21 2 37 2 -36 25% w

9.3 13 14 12 61 1 0 1% w

9.4 34 21 2 43 2 -35 25% W

9.6 37 26 2 35 1 -6 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 25 17 3 55 1 -1 1% w

10.3 35 23 2 40 1 -36 15% w

10.4 29 20 2 49 2 -37 10% w

10.5 30 20 2 48 1 -11 30% w

10.6 27 19 3 51 3 -5 15% w

Cells 11 1 38 26 2 34 1 -35 20% W

2 14 13 13 60 1 0 1% w

3 25 16 3 56 3 -4 20% w

Cells 12 1 26 19 3 52 1 -1 10% M

2 30 21 1 48 2 -3 20% M

3 18 21 1 60 1 -5 0% M

4 29 20 4 47 1 -5 5%

Cells 13 1 26 18 3 53 2 -36 100% M

2 28 19 2 51 1 -37 25% M

3 27 18 4 51 2 -5 5% M

4 31 18 1 50 3 -35 95% M

5 26 23 3 47 2 -36 30% M

6 33 25 1 41 1 -3 1% M

Cells 14 1 25 17 3 55 2 -1 1% M

2 29 20 3 48 3 -35 20% M

3 30 20 3 47 2 -15 8% M

4 32 22 2 44 1 -18 16% M

5 26 18 2 53 3 -3 3% M

6 36 24 1 39 1 -3 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 38 27 1 34 3 -36 60% W

2 28 23 1 48 1 -37 60% W

3 26 19 3 52 1 -36 60% W

4 46 34 1 19 2 -37 60% W

5 23 18 3 56 3 -36 60% W

6 34 25 2 39 2 -36 10% W

7 28 24 2 46 3 -37 10% W

8 19 15 2 64 2 -36 60% W

9 23 21 2 54 1 -36 60% W

10 26 23 2 49 2 -37 60% W

11 42 28 2 28 2 -35 60% W

12 34 27 2 37 1 -37 60% W

13 12 14 4 70 2 0 0% W

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

14 22 17 2 59 1 -1 1% W

15 20 17 3 60 2 -1 1% W

16 23 18 3 56 2 -1 0% W

17 15 11 5 69 1 0 0% W

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 20 17 3 60 3 -1 2% W

2 19 15 3 63 1 -1 2% W

3 33 26 1 40 1 -36 2% W

Cell 17 1 15 12 6 37 2 -1 1% W

2 24 21 2 53 3 -1 1% W

3 26 20 1 53 1 -36 100% W

4 31 23 1 45 3 -34 75% W

5 24 18 3 55 1 -26 60% W

6 25 18 3 54 1 -6 90% W

Cells 18 1 30 27 3 40 2 -35 50% M

2 27 23 3 47 1 -4 5% M

3 31 26 3 40 2 -36 30% M

4 36 29 1 34 2 -37 50% M

5 32 28 1 39 2 -37 50% M

Valves 1 17 15 4 64 3 -1 3% 0

2 23 20 3 54 1 -1 3% 0

3 27 23 1 49 1 -37 40% 0

4 26 17 3 54 2 -37 30% 35

5 23 18 3 56 2 -20 15% 10

6 24 21 1 55 1 -36 80% 10

7 31 23 2 45 3 -37 30% 30

8 23 19 3 55 3 -36 80% 45

9 34 29 1 36 1 -36 60% 70

10


Flare/Engine After 29 23 1 47 2 -40 190m3hr

Comments: Gasfield is being over extractedPoor gas recovery - extremely difficult to utilse the poor gas yield & operating the engine in reduced methanogenesis activity.Dewatered gas wells recharging quickly

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16



Weather: Mild/Dry 1004mb


(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flo

wline/manif

old (w/f/m)

Comments

Cells 1 1.3 22 17 3 58 1 -1 3% w

1.4 18 14 4 64 1 -1 3% w

Cells 2 2.1 14 13 4 69 1 0 3% W

2.2 17 15 5 63 2 0 3% w

2.3 34 21 2 43 2 -1 3% w

Cells 3 3.2 25 19 2 54 1 -1 3% w

3.4 31 19 3 47 2 -1 3% w

Cells 4 4.2 15 13 1 71 4 -6 10% w

4.3 38 22 2 38 2 -1 3% w

4.4 29 21 2 48 2 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 16 11 6 67 2 0 3% w

5.2 26 14 3 57 2 -1 3% W

5.3 23 15 3 59 3 -1 3% W

5.4 35 20 1 44 2 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 18 15 5 62 1 0 3% W

6.2 27 16 3 54 2 -1 3% w

6.3 23 17 2 58 1 -1 3% W

6.4 31 19 3 47 1 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 25 15 4 56 1 -1 3% W

7.2 29 23 2 46 1 -1 3% W

7.3 32 22 2 44 3 -1 3% W

7.4 27 21 3 49 2 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 41 23 2 34 2 -1 3% W

8.2 19 14 5 62 1 -2 6% M

8.3 26 19 3 52 4 -1 3% W

8.4 26 18 3 53 2 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 16 15 6 63 1 0 3% W

9.2 38 22 1 39 2 -22 25% w

9.3 17 15 4 64 1 0 1% w

9.4 32 18 2 48 2 -23 25% W

9.6 34 23 2 41 1 -8 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 27 18 2 62 1 -1 1% w Cap damaged perforated pipe above ground level

10.3 33 21 2 44 1 -23 15% w

10.4 31 21 2 46 3 -23 10% w

10.5 32 25 2 41 1 -21 30% w

10.6 29 21 3 47 2 -8 15% w

Cells 11 1 34 27 2 37 1 -25 20% W

2 16 14 10 60 1 0 1% w To excavate well would require digging up road

3 46 28 1 25 2 -12 20% w

Cells 12 1 24 16 3 57 1 -2 10% M

2 28 18 2 52 3 -2 20% M

3 21 19 1 59 3 -4 0% M

4 27 21 3 49 1 -4 5%

Cells 13 1 29 19 2 50 2 -21 100% M

2 31 20 2 47 1 -20 25% M

3 29 19 3 49 2 -8 5% M

4 33 21 2 44 3 -21 95% M

5 24 19 3 54 2 -20 30% M

6 30 23 1 46 2 -5 1% M

Cells 14 1 32 19 2 47 1 -3 1% M

2 33 21 2 44 3 -23 20% M

3 32 19 3 46 2 -12 8% M

4 35 24 4 37 1 -19 16% M

5 28 19 2 51 3 -2 3% M

6 32 23 1 44 2 -8 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 42 29 1 28 3 -25 60% W

2 38 20 1 41 2 -23 60% W

3 21 15 4 60 1 -2 60% W

4 48 31 1 20 2 -24 60% W

5 27 17 3 53 1 -23 60% W

6 32 23 2 43 2 -16 10% W

7 27 21 2 50 3 -16 10% W

8 16 12 2 70 2 -8 60% W

9 26 19 2 53 1 -24 60% W

10 29 24 2 45 2 -23 60% W

11 39 26 2 33 2 -24 60% W

12 32 24 2 42 1 -23 60% W

13 14 12 5 69 1 0 0% W

14 24 18 3 55 1 -2 1% W

15 22 15 3 60 2 -2 1% W

16 21 16 3 59 2 -2 0% W

17 13 10 6 71 1 0 0% W

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 19 17 4 60 3 -1 2% W

2 38 26 1 35 3 -22 2% W

3 35 28 1 36 1 -23 2% W

Cell 17 1 13 12 8 67 2 0 1% W

2 22 19 2 57 2 -1 1% W

3 28 21 3 48 1 -22 100% W

4 29 21 3 47 3 -23 75% W

5 25 18 2 55 1 -21 60% W

6 23 16 3 58 2 -3 90% W

Cells 18 1 32 29 2 37 2 -20 50% M

2 31 21 3 45 1 -6 5% M

3 29 21 2 48 2 -22 30% M

4 39 28 1 32 2 -23 50% M

5 28 20 3 49 2 -21 50% M

Valves 1 19 14 4 63 3 0 3% 0 Line 1

2 31 24 2 43 1 -28 3% 0 Line 2

3 19 17 1 63 1 -24 40% 0 Line 3

4 28 21 3 42 2 -22 30% 40 Manifold 11/12

5 32 23 2 43 2 -23 15% 10 Manifold 13

6 24 19 2 55 1 -25 80% 10 Manifold 14

7 30 22 2 46 2 -24 30% 30 Mainline cell 15

8 25 20 3 52 3 -25 80% 20 Cell 9&10

9 36 30 2 32 1 -26 60% 50 Manifold 17/18

10

Flare/Engine Before 28 22 2 48 2 -32 175m3hr Gas quality has reduced significantly

Flare/Engine After 32 24 1 43 2 -28 160m3hr

Comments: Gasfield is being over extractedPoor gas recovery - extremely difficult to utilse the poor gas yield & operating the engine in reduced methanogenesis activity.Dewatered gas wells recharging quickly

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16



Weather: Warm/Dry 1018mb


(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flowline/

manifold (w/f/m)

Comments

Cells 1 1.3 24 16 3 57 1 -1 3% w

1.4 16 13 4 67 1 -1 3% w

Cells 2 2.1 19 14 4 63 1 0 3% W

2.2 15 13 5 67 2 0 3% w

2.3 32 20 1 47 2 -1 3% w

Cells 3 3.2 26 19 2 53 1 -1 3% w

3.4 33 20 3 44 3 -1 3% w

Cells 4 4.2 16 14 1 69 4 -3 10% w

4.3 34 19 3 44 1 -1 3% w

4.4 31 19 2 48 1 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 19 11 4 66 2 0 3% w

5.2 24 12 3 61 1 -1 3% W

5.3 23 15 3 59 3 -1 3% W

5.4 37 21 1 41 1 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 16 13 5 66 1 0 3% W

6.2 25 16 4 55 2 -1 3% w

6.3 28 19 2 51 1 -1 3% W

6.4 29 19 3 49 1 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 27 14 3 56 2 -1 3% W

7.2 26 18 3 53 2 -1 3% W

7.3 29 19 2 50 1 -1 3% W

7.4 25 19 3 53 3 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 37 21 2 40 2 -1 3% W

8.2 23 17 3 57 2 -4 6% M

8.3 24 17 4 55 2 -1 3% W

8.4 28 20 2 50 1 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 14 12 8 66 1 0 3% W

9.2 36 23 1 40 3 -27 25% w

9.3 15 13 6 66 1 0 1% w

9.4 31 19 2 48 1 -28 25% W

9.6 32 21 2 45 2 -9 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 29 20 2 49 1 -1 1% w

10.3 30 19 3 48 1 -26 15% w

10.4 27 17 3 53 2 -27 10% w

10.5 34 23 2 41 1 -27 30% w

10.6 26 18 3 53 2 -10 15% w

Cells 11 1 36 24 2 38 2 -29 20% W

2 14 12 11 63 1 0 1% w

3 41 25 1 33 2 -17 20% w

Cells 12 1 26 18 2 54 1 -3 10% M

2 30 21 2 47 2 -3 20% M

3 23 20 1 56 2 -3 0% M

4 28 19 4 49 1 -3 5%

Cells 13 1 30 18 2 50 3 -26 100% M

2 29 21 2 48 1 -25 25% M

3 31 20 2 47 3 -10 5% M

4 35 20 1 44 2 -26 95% M

5 26 18 3 53 3 -27 30% M

6 28 21 1 50 2 -7 1% M

Cells 14 1 34 21 2 43 2 -5 1% M

2 32 19 2 47 3 -27 20% M

3 29 17 4 50 3 -18 8% M

4 32 22 3 43 2 -23 16% M

5 24 14 4 58 2 -1 3% M

6 29 21 2 48 2 -9 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 38 24 2 36 3 -28 60% W

2 32 21 1 46 2 -27 60% W

3 23 17 3 57 1 -4 60% W

4 43 27 1 29 2 -27 60% W

5 25 16 3 56 1 -26 60% W

6 28 19 3 50 2 -22 10% W

7 31 22 2 45 1 -22 10% W

8 19 14 3 64 1 -6 60% W

9 28 19 2 51 1 -28 60% W

10 27 21 2 50 3 -28 60% W

11 35 23 2 40 3 -27 60% W

12 31 22 3 44 1 -28 60% W

13 16 13 6 65 1 0 0%

14 21 17 3 59 1 -3 1%

15 19 13 5 63 2 -3 1%

16 20 17 3 60 2 -4 0%

17 16 12 7 65 1 0 0%

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 17 15 5 63 2 -1 2%

2 31 22 2 45 3 -26 2%

3 33 26 1 40 1 -27 2%

Cell 17 1 16 12 6 66 2 0 1% W

2 19 15 2 64 1 -1 1% W

3 26 19 3 52 1 -6 100% W

4 27 18 3 52 2 -28 75% W

5 26 17 3 54 1 -27 60% W

6 24 16 3 57 2 -5 90% W

Cells 18 1 34 30 2 34 2 -24 50% M

2 33 24 2 41 1 -8 5% M

3 31 25 2 42 2 -26 30% M

4 36 26 1 37 2 -27 50% M

5 31 23 3 43 2 -26 50% M

Valves 1 21 16 4 59 2 0 3% 0 Line now under suction after KCC works

2 26 21 2 51 1 -37 3% 0 Line 3

3 21 18 1 60 1 -30 40% 34 Manifold 11/12

4 26 19 2 53 2 -27 30% 12 Manifold 13

5 30 21 2 47 2 -27 15% 12 Manifold 14

6 22 17 2 59 1 -30 80% 35 Mainline cell 15

7 24 18 2 56 2 -31 30% 25 Cell 9&10

8 22 17 3 58 3 -30 80% 52 Mainline 17

9 32 27 1 40 1 -29 60% Manifold 18

Flare/Engine Before 24 16 3 57 2 -45 185m3hr Gas quality is terrible

Flare/Engine After

26 18 2 54 3 -38 170m3hr

Gas quality is holding but suction is increasing gradually,

when barometric pressure increases it puts pressure on

the gasfield

Comments: Gasfield is being over extractedPoor gas recovery - extremely difficult to utilse the poor gas yield & operating the engine in reduced methanogenesis activity.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16



Weather: Warm/Dry 1018mb


(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flowline/

manifold (w/f/m)

Comments

Cells 1 1.3 23 16 2 59 1 -1 3% w

1.4 18 13 3 66 1 -1 3% w

Cells 2 2.1 16 14 6 64 1 0 3% W

2.2 17 11 6 66 1 0 3% w

2.3 29 21 1 49 2 -1 3% w

Cells 3 3.2 25 18 3 54 1 -1 3% w

3.4 31 19 2 48 2 -1 3% w

Cells 4 4.2 18 13 2 67 3 -4 10% w

4.3 32 18 2 48 1 -1 3% w

4.4 30 20 3 47 1 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 17 9 6 68 1 0 3% w

5.2 26 14 3 57 2 -1 3% W

5.3 25 17 2 56 2 -1 3% W

5.4 34 21 1 44 1 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 18 14 4 64 1 0 3% W

6.2 28 18 3 51 3 -1 3% w

6.3 24 16 3 57 1 -1 3% W

6.4 26 20 3 51 1 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 24 13 3 60 2 -1 3% W

7.2 25 17 3 55 2 -1 3% W

7.3 27 18 2 53 1 -1 3% W

7.4 23 16 4 57 3 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 32 18 3 47 3 -1 3% W

8.2 21 16 3 60 2 -3 6% M

8.3 23 18 5 54 2 -1 3% W

8.4 26 19 2 53 1 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 15 14 6 65 1 0 3% W

9.2 34 21 1 44 2 -18 25% w

9.3 13 12 7 68 1 0 1% w

9.4 28 18 3 51 1 -17 25% W

9.6 29 19 2 50 3 -10 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 30 21 2 46 1 -1 1% w

10.3 28 18 3 51 1 -17 15% w

10.4 25 16 3 56 2 -17 10% w

10.5 31 22 2 45 1 -16 30% w

10.6 28 19 1 52 2 -12 15% w

Cells 11 1 38 22 2 38 2 -16 20% W

2 15 13 11 61 1 0 1% w

3 37 21 1 42 2 -13 20% w

Cells 12 1 24 16 4 56 1 -2 10% M

2 28 19 2 51 2 -2 20% M

3 28 22 1 49 3 -2 0% M

4 26 18 6 50 1 -1 5%

Cells 13 1 28 17 3 52 2 -18 100% M

2 27 18 2 53 1 -17 25% M

3 32 21 2 45 4 -4 5% M

4 30 19 1 50 1 -14 95% M

5 24 17 3 56 3 -12 30% M

6 26 18 2 54 2 -9 1% M

Cells 14 1 29 18 2 51 2 -6 1% M

2 30 18 2 50 1 -16 20% M

3 31 19 2 48 3 -17 8% M

4 28 19 3 50 1 -16 16% M

5 27 18 2 53 2 -3 3% M

6 32 23 1 44 3 -12 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 33 21 2 44 2 -16 60% W

2 33 22 1 44 2 -16 60% W

3 21 15 4 60 1 -3 60% W

4 42 25 1 32 3 -17 60% W

5 23 15 3 59 1 -16 60% W

6 25 18 2 55 2 -16 10% W

7 28 20 2 50 1 -17 10% W

8 18 13 2 67 1 -5 60% W

9 26 18 2 54 1 -16 60% W

10 25 20 2 53 3 -16 60% W

11 30 19 2 49 2 -17 60% W

12 30 21 2 47 1 -16 60% W

13 15 12 6 67 1 0 0% W

14 19 16 2 63 1 -2 1% W

15 21 14 4 61 2 -2 1% W

16 22 18 4 56 3 -3 0% W

17 14 11 8 67 1 0 0% W

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 18 15 4 63 2 -1 2% W

2 33 23 1 43 1 -15 2% W

3 32 24 1 -43 1 -15 2% W

Cell 17 1 15 13 6 66 2 0 1% W

2 20 16 2 62 1 0 1% W

3 23 17 4 56 1 -4 100% W

4 28 19 2 51 2 -15 75% W

5 22 16 3 59 1 -12 60% W

6 22 15 2 60 2 -3 90% W

Cells 18 1 31 28 2 39 2 -15 50% M

2 32 25 1 42 1 -8 5% M

3 32 26 2 40 2 -15 30% M

4 37 28 1 34 2 -16 50% M

5 32 24 2 42 2 -15 50% M


2 28 22 2 48 1 -21 3% 0 Line 3

3 26 21 1 52 1 -17 40% 40 Manifold 11/12

4 27 20 3 50 2 -17 30% 10 Manifold 13

5 31 22 2 45 2 -16 15% 10 Manifold 14

6 24 19 2 59 1 -18 80% 25 Mainline cell 15

7 22 17 2 59 2 -17 30% 15 Cell 9&10

8 24 18 3 55 3 -16 80% 40 Mainline 17

9 33 29 1 37 1 -17 60% Manifold 18

Flare/Engine Before 29 19 2 49 1 -26 150m3hr Gas quality constant

Flare/Engine After 30 20 2 48 2 -22 140m3hr Gas quality is holding and suction has reduced.

Comments: Gasfield is being over extractedPoor gas recovery - extremely difficult to utilse the poor gas yield & operating the engine in reduced methanogenesis activity.Small improvement on Cell 11

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16



Weather: Cool/showers


(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flowline/

manifold (w/f/m)

Comments

Cells 1 1.3 24 16 2 58 1 -1 3% w

1.4 17 12 4 69 1 -1 3% w

Cells 2 2.1 17 14 7 62 1 0 3% W

2.2 19 12 5 63 1 0 3% w

2.3 31 21 1 47 2 -1 3% w

Cells 3 3.2 27 17 2 51 1 -1 3% w

3.4 30 18 2 50 1 -1 3% w

Cells 4 4.2 30 20 2 48 2 -3 10% w

4.3 34 21 2 43 2 -1 3% w

4.4 36 22 2 40 1 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 19 12 5 64 1 0 3% w

5.2 28 16 3 53 1 -1 3% W

5.3 25 18 2 55 1 -1 3% W

5.4 36 23 1 40 1 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 19 15 3 63 1 0 3% W

6.2 26 19 3 52 2 -1 3% w

6.3 26 17 3 54 2 -1 3% W

6.4 28 19 2 51 1 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 22 15 3 60 2 -1 3% W

7.2 28 18 3 51 1 -1 3% W

7.3 29 18 2 51 1 -1 3% W

7.4 24 14 5 57 2 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 34 19 2 45 2 -1 3% W

8.2 25 18 2 55 2 -5 6% M

8.3 26 19 3 52 2 -1 3% W

8.4 28 19 2 51 1 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 17 14 4 65 1 0 3% W

9.2 38 22 1 39 2 -16 25% w

9.3 12 12 7 69 1 0 1% w

9.4 31 19 2 48 1 -15 25% W

9.6 34 22 2 42 2 -6 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 33 20 2 45 1 -1 1% w

10.3 30 19 3 48 1 -14 15% w

10.4 29 18 3 50 2 -13 10% w

10.5 36 22 2 40 1 -12 30% w

10.6 34 21 1 44 2 -8 15% w

Cells 11 1 43 24 2 31 2 -13 20% W

2 13 11 11 65 1 0 1% w

3 43 23 1 33 2 -10 20% w

Cells 12 1 28 19 3 50 1 -1 10% M

2 31 21 2 46 2 -1 20% M

3 39 28 1 32 4 -2 0% M

4 30 21 4 45 1 -1 5% M

Cells 13 1 30 18 3 49 2 -3 100% M

2 31 19 2 48 2 -7 25% M

3 32 22 1 43 1 -2 5% M

4 32 19 1 48 1 -3 95% M

5 28 17 2 53 3 -5 30% M

6 32 21 2 45 2 -6 1% M

Cells 14 1 31 19 2 48 2 -4 1% M

2 32 19 2 47 1 -8 20% M

3 34 20 2 44 3 -9 8% M

4 30 19 2 49 1 -8 16% M

5 33 20 2 45 2 -3 3% M

6 36 23 1 40 3 -6 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 39 26 2 33 3 -14 60% W

2 38 23 1 38 2 -13 60% W

3 26 17 3 54 1 -4 60% W

4 44 29 1 26 3 -13 60% W

5 26 16 3 55 1 -12 60% W

6 32 22 2 44 2 -13 10% W

7 34 26 2 38 1 -13 10% W

8 23 16 2 59 1 -6 60% W

9 32 21 2 45 1 -12 60% W

10 31 23 2 44 1 -13 60% W

11 36 21 2 41 2 -12 60% W

12 39 24 2 35 1 -12 60% W

13 19 14 4 63 1 0 0% W

14 23 16 2 59 1 -4 1% W

15 26 16 3 55 2 -3 1% W

16 25 18 4 53 3 -3 0% W

17 18 13 4 65 1 0 0% W

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 17 15 5 63 2 -1 2% W

2 42 28 1 29 1 -9 2% W

3 44 32 1 23 1 -8 2% W

Cell 17 1 18 14 4 64 2 0 1% W

2 19 15 2 64 1 0 1% W

3 25 18 3 54 1 -6 100% W

4 30 21 2 47 2 -9 75% W

5 26 18 3 53 1 -11 60% W

6 27 15 2 56 2 -6 90% W

Cells 18 1 43 35 1 21 2 -15 50% M

2 44 33 1 22 1 -5 5% M

3 48 37 1 14 2 -14 30% M

4 45 35 1 19 2 -14 50% M

5 37 29 1 33 2 -13 50% M


2 30 24 2 44 1 -16 3% 0 Line 3

3 38 29 1 32 1 -16 40% 35 Manifold 11/12

4 26 21 3 50 2 -11 30% 5 Manifold 13

5 33 25 2 40 2 -11 15% 5 Manifold 14

6 38 21 2 39 1 -16 80% 25 Mainline cell 15

7 31 23 2 44 2 -16 30% 10 Cell 9&10

8 30 23 3 44 3 -16 80% 20 Mainline 17

9 46 37 1 16 1 -16 60% Manifold 18

Flare/Engine Before 43 28 2 27 2 -19 120m3hr Gas quality constant

Flare/Engine After 45 30 1 24 1 -18 110m3hr Gas quality is holding and suction has reduced.

Comments: Gas yield and quality has improved on Cell 11 & 18

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16



Weather: Cool/wet


(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flowline/

manifold (w/f/m)

Comments

Cells 1 1.3 23 16 2 59 1 -1 3% W

1.4 18 12 5 71 1 -1 3% W

Cells 2 2.1 20 14 5 61 1 0 3% W

2.2 18 13 5 64 1 0 3% W

2.3 26 19 3 52 3 -1 3% W

Cells 3 3.2 28 17 2 50 1 -1 3% W

3.4 28 18 3 51 1 -1 3% W

Cells 4 4.2 26 21 1 52 2 -4 10% W

4.3 31 19 2 48 2 -1 3% W

4.4 33 20 3 44 1 -1 3% W

W

Cells 5 5.1 21 14 4 61 1 0 3% W

5.2 26 15 4 55 1 -1 3% W

5.3 23 15 3 59 1 -1 3% W

5.4 30 21 3 46 1 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 17 13 4 66 1 0 3% W

6.2 22 17 3 58 3 -1 3% W

6.3 23 16 3 58 1 -1 3% W

6.4 27 18 2 53 2 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 24 16 3 57 2 -1 3% W

7.2 25 17 3 55 2 -1 3% W

7.3 25 16 3 56 1 -1 3% W

7.4 24 16 4 56 2 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 32 18 2 48 3 -1 3% W

8.2 27 19 2 52 3 -5 6% W

8.3 24 19 3 54 2 -1 3% W

8.4 29 20 2 49 1 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 15 12 4 69 1 0 3% W

9.2 35 19 1 45 3 -19 25% W

9.3 14 11 6 69 2 0 1% W

9.4 25 16 2 57 1 0 25% W

9.6 30 24 2 44 2 -10 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 30 20 2 48 1 -1 1% W

10.3 28 20 3 49 1 -14 15% W

10.4 27 19 2 52 2 -19 10% W

10.5 34 20 2 44 1 -18 30% W

10.6 36 23 1 40 2 -14 15% W

Cells 11 1 40 23 2 35 2 -17 20% W

2 12 10 15 63 1 0 1% W

3 41 25 1 33 2 -19 20% W

Cells 12 1 27 18 3 52 1 -1 10% M

2 29 21 2 48 2 -1 20% M

3 27 22 1 50 4 -2 0% M

4 34 21 3 42 1 -1 5% M

Cells 13 1 32 19 3 46 2 -2 100% M

2 33 19 3 45 2 -12 25% M

3 30 20 2 47 1 -4 5% M

4 34 21 3 42 1 -7 95% M

5 26 19 2 53 3 -9 30% M

6 36 22 2 40 3 -10 1% M

Cells 14 1 33 21 2 44 2 -9 1% M

2 30 19 2 49 1 -12 20% M

3 38 22 2 38 3 -13 8% M

4 28 17 2 53 1 -12 16% M

5 31 21 2 46 2 -11 3% M

6 33 21 1 45 3 -10 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 34 23 2 41 3 -19 60% W

2 32 20 1 47 2 -20 60% W

3 24 15 3 58 1 -7 60% W

4 38 23 1 38 3 -21 60% W

5 25 17 3 55 1 -18 60% W

6 30 20 2 48 2 -19 10% W

7 29 22 3 46 1 -19 10% W

8 19 15 2 64 1 -7 60% W

9 30 18 3 49 2 -18 60% W

10 29 21 3 47 1 -19 60% W

11 30 18 3 49 2 -19 60% W

12 33 22 2 43 1 -18 60% W

13 16 13 5 66 1 0 0% W

14 21 15 4 60 3 -2 1% W

15 22 14 3 61 2 -2 1% W

16 21 16 4 59 2 -2 0% W

17 16 12 6 66 1 0 0% W

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 15 13 6 66 2 0 2% W

2 40 26 1 34 1 -12 2% W

3 42 29 1 28 1 -17 2% W

Cell 17 1 16 13 4 67 2 0 1% W

2 17 13 2 68 1 0 1% W

3 24 18 3 55 1 -9 100% W

4 28 20 2 50 2 -13 75% W

5 23 16 3 58 1 -14 60% W

6 25 14 3 58 2 -12 90% W

Cells 18 1 34 27 1 38 2 -8 50% M

2 35 28 2 35 1 -9 5% M

3 43 32 1 24 2 -23 30% M

4 36 30 3 31 2 -21 50% M

5 32 27 4 37 2 -8 50% M


2 30 24 2 44 1 -16 3% 0 Line 3

3 38 29 1 32 1 -16 40% 40 Manifold 11/12

4 26 21 3 50 2 -11 30% 10 Manifold 13

5 33 25 2 40 2 -11 15% 10 Manifold 14

6 38 21 2 39 1 -16 80% 30 Mainline cell 15

7 31 23 2 44 2 -16 30% 20 Cell 9&10

8 30 23 3 44 3 -16 80% 50 Mainline 17

9 46 37 1 16 1 -16 60% Manifold 18


Flare/Engine After 33.6 26.8 1.4 38 2 -33 160m3hr Gas quality is reduced and suction increasing..

Comments:

Gas quality has reduced from last month and suction increased.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16





(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flowline/

manifold (w/f/m)

Comments

Cells 1 1.3 24 17 2 57 2 -1 3% w

1.4 19 13 6 62 1 -1 3% w

Cells 2 2.1 22 14 4 60 2 0 3% W

2.2 19 13 5 63 1 0 3% w

2.3 29 20 2 49 2 -1 3% w

Cells 3 3.2 29 18 3 50 1 -1 3% w

3.4 26 16 4 54 2 -1 3% w

Cells 4 4.2 21 18 1 60 1 -8 10% w

4.3 30 19 3 48 1 -1 3% w

4.4 35 21 3 41 1 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 23 15 3 59 1 0 3% w

5.2 24 14 4 59 2 -1 3% W

5.3 26 16 3 55 1 -1 3% W

5.4 28 18 3 51 1 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 19 13 4 64 1 0 3% W

6.2 24 18 4 54 2 -1 3% w

6.3 25 16 3 56 2 -1 3% W

6.4 24 16 3 57 2 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 27 17 3 53 2 -1 3% W

7.2 28 18 3 51 2 -1 3% W

7.3 22 14 4 60 1 -1 3% W

7.4 26 17 3 54 2 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 30 17 2 51 2 -1 3% W

8.2 24 18 2 56 3 -4 6% M

8.3 21 16 3 60 2 -1 3% W

8.4 27 20 2 51 1 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 17 13 6 64 1 0 3% W

9.2 32 18 1 49 3 -32 25% w

9.3 16 11 6 67 3 0 1% w

9.4 20 13 2 65 1 0 25% W

9.6 26 19 2 53 2 -21 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 32 21 2 45 1 -2 1% w

10.3 26 19 3 52 1 -28 15% w

10.4 25 18 3 54 2 -30 10% w

10.5 30 18 3 49 1 -32 30% w

10.6 33 21 2 44 2 -32 15% w

Cells 11 1 33 21 2 44 2 -39 20% W

2 14 11 14 61 1 0 1% w

3 35 22 1 42 2 -24 20% w

Cells 12 1 25 17 3 55 1 -1 10% M

2 22 18 2 58 2 -1 20% M

3 21 18 1 60 3 -3 0% M

4 28 20 2 50 1 -3 5%

Cells 13 1 30 18 3 49 2 -4 100% M

2 31 17 3 49 2 -22 25% M

3 29 20 2 49 1 -8 5% M

4 29 19 3 49 1 -22 95% M

5 24 16 3 57 3 -23 30% M

6 30 20 2 48 3 -16 1% M

Cells 14 1 31 19 2 48 2 -14 1% M

2 29 20 3 48 1 -21 20% M

3 34 19 2 44 3 -21 8% M

4 28 18 2 52 2 -16 16% M

5 29 19 2 50 2 -19 3% M

6 30 19 3 48 1 -20 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 32 21 2 45 2 -36 60% W

2 34 21 1 44 2 -35 60% W

3 26 16 3 55 1 -9 60% W

4 34 21 1 44 4 -36 60% W

5 25 18 2 55 1 -35 60% W

6 29 19 2 50 2 -36 10% W

7 27 22 3 48 1 -10 10% W

8 21 16 2 61 1 -10 60% W

9 28 16 3 53 2 -35 60% W

10 26 19 3 52 1 -36 60% W

11 29 19 2 50 3 -35 60% W

12 31 22 3 44 1 -36 60% W

13 15 13 5 67 1 0 0% W

14 20 15 3 62 2 -1 1% W

15 21 14 4 59 2 -1 1% W

16 18 14 4 61 2 -20 0% W

17 18 13 4 65 1 0 0% W

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 17 12 5 66 2 0 2% W

2 32 27 1 40 1 -35 2% W

3 31 27 1 41 1 -36 2% W

Cell 17 1 15 12 4 69 2 0 1% W

2 18 12 3 67 1 0 1% W

3 22 17 3 58 1 -13 100% W

4 26 18 2 54 2 -24 75% W

5 25 17 3 55 1 -25 60% W

6 23 13 3 61 2 -24 90% W

Cells 18 1 28 23 3 46 2 -35 50% M

2 22 18 3 57 1 -17 5% M

3 32 28 1 39 2 -37 30% M

4 31 26 2 41 3 -35 50% M

5 29 23 3 45 2 -24 50% M

Valves 1 19 15 4 63 1 0 3% 0

2 28 24 2 46 1 -39 3% 0 Line 3

3 23 18 1 58 1 -38 40% 50 Manifold 11/12

4 25 19 3 53 2 -42 30% 10 Manifold 13

5 25 20 3 52 2 -43 15% 10 Manifold 14

6 25 19 3 53 1 -42 80% 35 Mainline cell 15

7 27 22 2 49 3 -22 30% 25 Cell 9&10

8 24 19 3 54 2 -39 80% 50 Mainline 17

9 31 26 1 42 3 -40 60% Manifold 18

Flare/Engine Before 28 22 2.8 47 2 -45 180m3hr Gas quality has reduced

Flare/Engine After 30 23 2 45 2 -41 170m3hr Gas quality and volume is reducing

Comments: Gas quality has reduced from last month again, pumping is continuing on gas well 9.4

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16



Weather: Cool/wet


(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flowline/

manifold (w/f/m)

Comments

Cells 1 1.3 24 16 2 58 1 -1 3% w

1.4 18 14 5 63 1 -1 3% w

Cells 2 2.1 22 15 4 59 1 0 3% W

2.2 20 14 4 62 1 0 3% w

2.3 27 20 3 68 3 -1 3% w

Cells 3 3.2 27 17 2 54 1 -1 3% w

3.4 29 19 3 49 1 -1 3% w

Cells 4 4.2 29 22 1 48 2 -5 10% w

4.3 30 18 2 50 2 -1 3% w

4.4 31 19 3 47 1 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 20 13 4 63 1 0 3% w

5.2 27 15 4 54 1 -1 3% W

5.3 23 15 3 59 1 -1 3% W

5.4 28 21 3 48 1 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 18 14 4 64 1 0 3% W

6.2 23 18 3 56 2 -1 3% w

6.3 21 14 3 62 1 -1 3% W

6.4 25 17 3 55 1 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 25 16 4 55 1 -1 3% W

7.2 27 18 3 52 2 -1 3% W

7.3 23 15 3 59 2 -1 3% W

7.4 26 16 3 55 2 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 30 17 2 51 2 -1 3% W

8.2 28 19 2 51 3 -3 6% M

8.3 26 18 4 52 1 -1 3% W

8.4 26 16 3 55 1 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 17 13 4 66 1 0 3% W

9.2 31 18 1 50 2 -34 25% w

9.3 13 10 6 71 1 0 1% w

9.4 27 17 2 54 2 0 25% W

9.6 28 22 2 48 2 -21 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 28 18 2 52 2 -1 1% w

10.3 30 21 3 46 1 -34 15% w

10.4 29 21 2 48 2 -35 10% w

10.5 31 19 3 47 2 -34 30% w

10.6 30 20 1 49 1 -35 15% w

Cells 11 1 36 20 2 42 2 -36 20% W

2 10 10 17 63 1 0 1% w

3 47 29 4 20 2 -34 20% w

Cells 12 1 24 18 3 55 1 -1 10% M

2 26 19 2 52 3 -1 20% M

3 39 26 1 34 2 -3 0% M

4 38 26 2 32 1 -3 5%

Cells 13 1 33 19 2 46 2 -3 100% M

2 31 18 3 47 2 -21 25% M

3 33 21 2 58 1 -21 5% M

4 31 21 3 45 1 -16 95% M

5 29 20 3 48 3 -15 30% M

6 32 20 2 46 2 -21 1% M

Cells 14 1 36 22 2 40 2 -30 1% M

2 27 18 2 53 1 -27 20% M

3 42 24 2 32 3 -28 8% M

4 32 23 1 44 2 -25 16% M

5 34 23 2 41 2 -28 3% M

6 30 20 1 49 3 -29 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 35 26 2 37 3 -40 60% W

2 31 21 1 47 2 -39 60% W

3 28 17 3 52 1 -12 60% W

4 40 25 1 34 3 -40 60% W

5 27 18 3 52 1 -23 60% W

6 32 22 2 44 3 -23 10% W

7 26 20 1 53 1 -12 10% W

8 21 16 2 61 1 -12 60% W

9 32 20 3 45 2 -27 60% W

10 30 21 3 46 1 -25 60% W

11 29 19 3 49 2 -24 60% W

12 34 24 2 40 2 -25 60% W

13 14 12 7 67 1 0 0% W

14 19 14 4 63 3 -1 1% W

15 24 15 3 58 2 -3 1% W

16 23 17 3 57 2 -4 0% W

17 15 11 6 68 1 0 0% W

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 17 14 5 64 2 0 2% W

2 37 29 1 33 1 -34 2% W

3 39 30 1 30 1 -38 2% W

Cell 17 1 15 14 4 67 2 0 1% W

2 17 13 3 67 1 0 1% W

3 26 19 3 52 1 -23 100% W

4 30 21 2 47 2 -29 75% W

5 24 19 3 54 1 -25 60% W

6 22 13 3 62 2 -26 90% W

Cells 18 1 32 28 3 37 2 -12 50% M

2 34 29 2 35 1 -12 5% M

3 38 31 1 30 2 -40 30% M

4 34 28 2 36 2 -40 50% M

5 30 24 3 43 2 -16 50% M

Valves 1 20 16 4 60 2 0 3% 0

2 32 24 2 42 1 -43 3% 0 Line 3

3 30 23 1 46 1 -42 40% 40 Manifold 11/12

4 26 20 3 51 2 -21 30% 5 Manifold 13

5 30 20 3 47 2 -31 15% 5 Manifold 14

6 30 24 2 44 2 -40 80% 30 Mainline cell 15

7 31 25 2 42 2 -37 30% 25 Cell 9&10

8 35 24 2 39 3 -40 80% 45 Mainline 17

9 36 29 1 34 1 -40 60% Manifold 18

Flare/Engine Before 30 21 2 46 2 -48 155m3hr Gas quality has reduced

Flare/Engine After 32 22 1 44 2 -45 150m3hr Gas quality and volume is reducing

Comments: Barometric pressure remains very high at 1028mb and has been high for a while, this is putting pressure on the gasfield and Gas quality.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16



Weather: Cool/Dry


(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flowline/

manifold (w/f/m)

Comments

Cells 1 1.3 23 16 3 60 1 -1 3% W

1.4 21 15 4 60 2 -1 3% W

Cells 2 2.1 24 15 4 57 2 0 3% W

2.2 21 14 3 61 1 0 3% W

2.3 29 22 3 46 2 -1 3% W

Cells 3 3.2 25 18 3 54 1 -1 3% W

3.4 26 18 3 53 2 -1 3% W

Cells 4 4.2 32 23 1 44 2 -30 10% W

4.3 28 17 2 53 2 -1 3% W

4.4 30 20 2 48 1 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 22 14 4 60 1 0 3% W

5.2 25 16 3 56 2 -1 3% W

5.3 26 16 3 55 1 -1 3% W

5.4 26 19 3 52 1 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 18 13 5 64 1 0 3% W

6.2 24 18 3 55 2 -1 3% W

6.3 23 16 3 58 1 -1 3% W

6.4 23 16 3 58 2 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 25 17 4 54 1 -1 3% W

7.2 26 18 2 54 2 -1 3% W

7.3 21 13 3 63 2 -1 3% W

7.4 24 15 3 58 1 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 32 18 2 48 2 -1 3% W

8.2 27 18 3 52 2 -6 6% M

8.3 24 17 2 57 1 -1 3% W

8.4 25 16 3 56 2 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 15 11 6 68 1 0 3% W

9.2 33 20 1 46 2 -43 25% w

9.3 16 11 3 70 1 0 1% w

9.4 25 16 2 57 2 0 25% W

9.6 30 23 2 45 2 -40 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 29 17 2 52 2 -1 1% W

10.3 31 21 2 46 1 -42 15% W

10.4 27 19 2 52 2 -42 10% W

10.5 29 19 3 47 2 -41 30% W

10.6 28 21 1 50 1 -41 15% W

Cells 11 1 32 24 4 40 2 -45 20% W

2 12 11 16 61 1 0 1% W

3 35 26 2 37 2 -20 20% W

Cells 12 1 22 16 3 59 1 -2 10% M

2 23 19 2 56 2 -1 20% M

3 24 22 1 53 2 -3 0% M

4 32 22 2 44 1 -3 5% M

Cells 13 1 30 18 2 50 3 -3 100% M

2 34 19 3 44 2 -40 25% M

3 29 18 2 51 1 -41 5% M

4 32 23 2 43 1 -41 95% M

5 31 22 2 45 3 -39 30% M

6 29 19 2 50 2 -40 1% M

Cells 14 1 34 22 2 42 2 -2 1% M

2 28 19 2 51 1 -42 20% M

3 36 23 2 39 3 -41 8% M

4 30 24 1 45 2 -43 16% M

5 32 21 2 45 3 -42 3% M

6 31 22 1 46 3 -42 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 31 27 2 40 3 -41 60% W

2 30 22 1 47 2 -40 60% W

3 26 16 3 55 1 -8 60% W

4 32 27 1 40 3 -40 60% W

5 25 18 3 54 1 -42 60% W

6 31 21 3 47 2 -41 60% W

7 24 18 1 57 1 -22 60% W

8 19 16 2 64 2 -22 60% W

9 29 19 3 49 2 -41 60% W

10 28 19 3 50 2 -40 60% W

11 27 18 3 52 1 -41 60% W

12 31 22 2 45 1 -40 60% W

13 13 11 7 69 1 0 0% W

14 21 14 3 61 2 -3 1% W

15 22 14 3 60 1 -5 1% W

16 20 16 3 59 2 -2 0% W

17 11 11 6 72 1 0 0% W

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 19 15 4 62 1 -2 2% W

2 35 30 1 34 1 -42 2% W

3 34 27 1 38 1 -41 2% W

Cell 17 1 13 13 4 70 2 0 1% W

2 17 11 3 69 1 0 1% W

3 23 19 3 55 1 -42 100% W

4 28 19 2 51 2 -42 75% W

5 19 14 3 64 1 -10 60% W

6 20 11 5 64 2 -10 90% W

Cells 18 1 29 26 3 42 2 -15 50% M

2 26 21 2 51 2 -14 5% M

3 31 27 1 41 2 -41 30% M

4 29 22 2 47 1 -40 50% M

5 28 22 3 47 2 -22 50% M

Valves 1 21 18 3 58 2 0 3% 0 Line 1/2

2 31 25 2 42 1 -42 3% 0 Line 3

3 28 25 4 43 1 -46 40% 35 Manifold 11/12

4 27 22 3 48 2 -45 30% 10 Manifold 13

5 29 21 3 47 2 -43 15% 10 Manifold 14

6 26 22 2 50 2 -45 80% 25 Mainline cell 15

7 32 26 2 40 2 -43 30% 25 Cell 9&10

8 33 27 2 38 3 -46 80% 45 Mainline 17

9 32 26 1 40 1 -42 60% Manifold 18

Flare/Engine Before 31 23 2 44 2 -60 160m3hr Gas quality remains poor

Flare/Engine After 33 26 1 40 2 -50 150m3hr Gas quality s poor. Suction starting to increase

Comments: Barometric pressure remains very high, this is putting pressure on the gasfield and Gas quality.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16





(%)CO (ppm)

Static

Pressure

(mb)

Valve Pos

(%)

Monitor at

wellhead/flowline/

manifold (w/f/m)

Comments

Cells 1 1.3 25 14 3 58 1 -1 3% W

1.4 19 14 4 63 1 -1 3% W

Cells 2 2.1 24 15 3 60 2 0 3% W

2.2 19 13 3 65 2 0 3% W

2.3 26 19 2 53 1 -1 3% W

Cells 3 3.2 25 19 4 52 1 -1 3% W

3.4 25 17 3 55 2 -1 3% W

Cells 4 4.2 23 20 1 56 2 -43 10% W

4.3 26 17 3 54 3 -1 3% W

4.4 28 19 2 51 1 -1 3%

Cells 5 5.1 24 15 4 57 1 0 3% W

5.2 26 18 3 53 2 -1 3% W

5.3 24 16 4 56 1 -1 3% W

5.4 27 20 3 50 1 -1 3% W

Cells 6 6.1 19 14 5 62 1 0 3% W

6.2 23 19 3 55 2 -1 3% W

6.3 21 15 3 61 1 -1 3% W

6.4 24 16 3 57 1 -1 3% W

Cells 7 7.1 24 18 3 55 1 -1 3% W

7.2 25 18 2 55 2 -1 3% W

7.3 22 14 3 61 2 -1 3% W

7.4 23 15 4 58 1 -1 3% W

7.5

Cells 8 8.1 29 19 2 50 2 -1 3% W

8.2 24 17 3 56 2 -12 6% M

8.3 22 16 2 60 1 -1 3% W

8.4 23 15 4 58 3 -1 1% W

Cells 9 9.1 14 12 4 70 1 0 3% W

9.2 24 19 1 56 2 -62 25% W

9.3 15 10 3 72 1 0 1% W

9.4 23 14 3 60 2 0 25% W

9.6 28 21 2 49 2 -65 1% W

Cells 10 10.2 27 17 3 53 2 -1 1% W

10.3 28 19 2 51 2 -63 15% W

10.4 26 18 2 54 2 -64 10% W

10.5 29 20 3 48 3 -63 30% W

10.6 25 18 2 55 2 -64 15% W

Cells 11 1 27 22 4 47 2 -63 20% W

2 14 12 15 59 1 0 1% W

3 30 23 2 45 2 -15 20% W

Cells 12 1 19 14 3 64 1 -2 10% M

2 21 18 2 59 2 -1 20% M

3 22 18 1 59 3 -7 0% M

4 26 20 2 52 1 -7 5% M

Cells 13 1 28 18 2 52 2 -5 100% M

2 31 19 3 47 2 -64 25% M

3 27 17 3 53 1 -63 5% M

4 30 22 2 46 1 -64 95% M

5 29 20 2 49 2 -64 30% M

6 27 18 3 52 3 -63 1% M

Cells 14 1 32 22 2 44 3 -4 1% M

2 29 20 2 49 2 -65 20% M

3 33 21 2 44 3 -63 8% M

4 34 26 1 39 2 -14 16% M

5 29 19 2 50 3 -64 3% M

6 28 21 2 49 2 -64 1% M

Cells 15/16 1 28 24 2 46 3 -63 60% W

2 27 21 1 51 3 -64 60% W

3 25 19 3 53 1 -12 60% W

4 30 25 1 44 2 -65 60% W

5 26 18 3 53 1 -64 10% W

6 28 19 2 51 2 -64 10% W

7 22 17 1 60 2 -26 60% W

8 20 17 2 61 3 -26 60% W

9 26 17 3 54 2 -65 60% W

10 24 16 3 57 2 -64 60% W

11 23 15 4 58 1 -63 60% W

12 26 20 2 52 2 -64 60% W

13 13 10 8 69 1 0 0% W

14 16 14 3 67 2 0 1% W

15 20 13 3 64 1 -2 1% W

16 18 15 3 64 2 -2 0% W

17 13 11 4 72 1 0 0% W

Cell17/18

New Wells 1 20 15 4 61 1 -1 2% W

2 25 21 1 53 1 -66 2% W

3 27 23 1 49 1 -65 2% W

Cell 17 1 15 12 4 68 2 0 1% W

2 15 11 3 71 1 0 1% W

3 21 19 3 57 1 -23 100% W

4 25 20 2 54 2 -40 75% W

5 21 15 3 61 1 -15 60% W

6 17 11 5 67 3 -5 90% W

Cells 18 1 23 20 3 54 2 -17 50% M

2 21 15 2 63 2 -17 5% M

3 28 24 1 47 2 -65 30% M

4 27 23 2 48 1 -66 50% M

5 24 20 3 33 2 -25 50% M

Valves 1 22 18 3 57 2 0 3% 0 Line 1/2

2 24 19 2 55 2 -68 3% 0 Line 3

3 21 18 3 58 1 -66 40% 50 Manifold 11/12

4 28 21 3 48 2 -66 30% 10 Manifold 13

5 30 22 2 46 2 -65 15% 10 Manifold 14

6 23 20 2 55 3 -66 80% 30 Mainline cell 15

7 29 22 2 47 1 -66 30% 25 Cell 9&10

8 27 23 2 48 2 -65 80% 55 Mainline 17

9 28 24 1 47 1 -66 60% Manifold 18

Flare/Engine Before 26 19 3 52 2 -73 220m3hr Gas quality remains poor

Flare/Engine After 27 21 2 50 3 -68 210m3hr Gas quality s poor. Suction starting to increase

Comments:Barometric pressure has been high at 1030/1040mb for the last 6 weeks and has put major pressure on the gasfield. Engine is been rested on average 4 hours everyday,as gasfield needs to recover.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

of 31

Appendix E: Landfill Gas Survey 2018

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

A survey of landfill sites to determine the quantity of methane flared and or recovered in utilisation plants for 2018

Please choose from the drop down menu the license number for your site

Please choose from the drop down menu the name of the landfill site

Please enter the number of flares operational at your site in 2018

Please enter the number of engines operational at your site in 2018

Total methane flared 0 kg/year

Total methane utilised in engines 274,303 kg/year

Introduction

[email protected]

[email protected]

Once completed please send the completed file as an attachment clearly stating the name and or license number of the landfill site (e.g. W000 Xanadu landfill_2018) to:

Please note that the closing date for reciept of completed surveys is 31/03/2019

The Office of Environmental Sustainability (OES) of the Environmental Protection Agency acts as the inventory agency in Ireland with responsibility for compiling and reporting national greenhouse gas

inventories to the European Commission and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. In addition to meeting international commitments Ireland’s national greenhouse gas

inventory informs national agencies and Government departments as they face the challenge to curb emissions and meet Ireland’s emission reduction targets under the Effort Sharing Decision (No.

406/2009/EC). The national inventory also informs data suppliers, making them aware of the importance of their contributions to the inventory process and a means of identifying areas where input data

may be improved.

It is on this basis that the Environmental Protection Agency is asking landfill operators to partake in this survey so that the most uptodate information on methane flaring and recovery in utilisation plants

at landfills sites is used in calculating the contribution of the landfill sector to national greenhouse gas emissions

The Environmental Protection Agency wishes to thank you for partaking in this survey. If you have any questions about the survey and how to complete it please view the "Help sheet" worksheet. If

however, your query is not answered by viewing the "Help sheet" worksheet please contact:

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

to be filled in by licensee calculated by spreadsheet

Engine No. 1

Engine type ?

Monthly Method Runtime Runtime Downtime Total runtime Average Inlet

Average Inlet

Temp Average Flow Average CH4 Average CO2 Average O2 Combustion Total CH4 Total CH4

M/C/E days/month hrs/day hrs hrs/month Pressure (mbg) ◦ C Rate (m3/hr) %v/v %v/v %v/v efficiency (%) m3kgs

January M 31 24 66 678 ‐57 10 230 32.00 28.00 1.00 98.0 48,903 31,865

February M 28 24 54 618 ‐57 10 200 30.00 26.00 1.00 98.0 36,338 23,678

March M 31 24 118 626 ‐40 10 190 30.00 23.00 1.00 98.0 34,968 23,191

April M 30 24 102 618 ‐28 10 160 32.00 24.00 1.00 98.0 31,009 20,818

May M 31 24 86 658 ‐38 10 170 30.00 18.00 2.00 98.0 32,887 21,855

June M 30 24 93 627 ‐22 10 140 30.00 20.00 2.00 98.0 25,807 17,432

July M 31 24 77 667 ‐18 10 110 45.00 30.00 1.00 98.0 32,356 21,943

August M 31 24 57 687 ‐33 10 160 33.60 26.00 1.50 98.0 36,194 24,177

September M 31 24 65 679 ‐41 10 170 30.00 23.00 2.00 98.0 33,936 22,483

October M 31 24 70 674 ‐45 10 150 32.00 22.00 1.00 98.0 31,705 20,918

November M 30 24 69 651 ‐50 10 150 33.00 26.00 1.00 98.0 31,580 20,728

December M 31 24 110 634 ‐68 10 210 30.00 21.00 2.00 98.0 39,143 25,213

Total 7,817 414,828 274,303

Please note: Only fill the "Yearly" table if data is not availabe or cannot be calculated nor estimated on a monthly basis

Yearly Method Runtime Runtime Downtime Total runtime Average Inlet

Average Inlet

Temp Average Flow Average CH4 Average CO2 Average O2 Combustion Total CH4 Total CH4

M/C/E days/year hrs/day hrs hrs/year Pressure (mbg) ◦ C Rate m3/hr %v/v %v/v %v/v efficiency (%) m3kgs

2018 0 Select 10 98.0 0 0

If "other" enter engine description here

Month /year comissioned ?

Month decomissioned if decomissioned in 2018 ?

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

of 31

Appendix F: Engine Stack Monitoring Testing

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:16

Document No.: NOLATL1061218 / 2018775 EPA Licence No.: W0001-04

Visit No: 1 Licence Holder: North Kerry Landfill, E1

Year: 2018 Facility Location: North Kerry Landfill Facility

Office: Trim Rev.No: 1

Facility Name North Kerry Landfill Facility

Contact Person Ms Ruth Baker

EPA Licence Number W0001-04

Report Title Air Emissions Compliance Monitoring Emissions Report

Company addressAir Scientific Ltd., 32 DeGranville Court, Dublin road,

Trim, Co. Meath

Stack Emissions Testing Report Commissioned by B9 Power

Job Reference Number NOLATL1061218 / 2018775

Report Written By Amanda Sheridan

Report Approved by Dr. John Casey

Licence Holder North Kerry Landfill, E1

Stack Reference Number E1

Dates of the Monitoring Campaign 06/12/2018

Version 1

Signature of Approver

Stack Testing Team Dr. John Casey

Report Date 29/01/2019

Report Type Test Report Compliance Monitoring

Page 1 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Contents4

4

4

4

4

5

5

6

7

8

9

10

12

12

13

14

15

15

15

16

16

24

24

25

26

29

35

36

37

39

43

45

46

47

50

70

72

1. Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

I. Monitoring Objectives ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Accreditation details …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Monitoring Dates & Times ………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Monitoring, Equipment & Analytical Methods …………………………………………………………………….

Sampling Deviations ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Reference Documents …………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Suitability of sampling location ……………………………………………………………………………………………

Overall Aim of the monitoring Campaign ……………………………………………………………………………

Special Requirements …………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Target Parameters ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Emission Limit Values …………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Reference Conditions …………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Overall Results ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Preliminary stack survey calculations ………………………………………………………………………………….

IV. Appendix III - Individual parameter sampling details and results ………………………………………

Total Particulate Matter: Sampling details and results ………………………………………………………..

Total Particulates Quality Assurance …………………………………………………………………………………..

Carbon Monoxide Quality Assurance ………………………………………………………………………………….

Carbon Monoxide Results & Sampling details …………………………………………………………………….

Process details …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Stack diagram ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

2. APPENDICES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

II. Appendix I - Monitoring Personnel & Equipment ………………………………………………………………

Stack Emissions Monitoring Personnel ………………………………………………………………………………..

III. Appendix II - Stack Details & flow characteristics ………………………………………………………………

Sulphur Dioxide Trend ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Sulphur Dioxide Results & Measurement Uncertainty ………………………………………………………..

Sulphur Dioxide Quality Assurance …………………………………………………………………………………….

Sulphur Dioxide Sampling Details & Results ……………………………………………………………………….

Carbon Monoxide Trend …………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Carbon Monoxide Measurement Uncertainty …………………………………………………………………….

Oxides of Nitrogen Quality Assurance ………………………………………………………………………………..

Oxides of Nitrogen Results & Sampling details …………………………………………………………………..

Oxides of Nitrogen Trend ……………………………………………………………………………………………………

Oxides of Nitrogen Measurement Uncertainty …………………………………………………………………..

Oxygen Quality Assurance ………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Page 2 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





75

76

76

78

80

Opinions and interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of Air Scientific Limited INAB accreditation.

This test report shall not be reproduced, without the written approval of Air Scientific Limited. All sampling

and reporting is completed in accordance with Environmental Protection Agency Air Guidance Note 2 requirements.

Moisture Results & Measurement Uncertainty ………………………………………………………………..

Oxygen Trend ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Carbon Dioxide Quality Assurance ……………………………………………………………………………………..

Carbon Dioxide Sampling Details & Results ……………………………………………………………………….

Carbon Dioxide Trend ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

Page 3 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





I.

1. Executive Summary

Monitoring Objectives

Overall Aim of the monitoring CampaignThe aim of the monitoring campaign was to demonstrate compliance with a set of emission limit values as specified in the site licence.

Special Requirements

Volume (m3.h-1)

Oxygen (O2)

Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)

Stack Gas Temperature

There were no special requirements.

Target Parameters

Total Particulate Matter (TPM)

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) as NO2

Page 4 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





CO - -

NOx as NO2 500 -

Emission Limit Values

Emission Limit Values / Mass Emissions Limit Values mg.m-3 kg.h-1

TPM 130 -

Stack Gas Temperature - -

Volume (m3.h-1) 3,000 -

SO2 - -

Total Pressure kPa 101.3

Moisture % Yes

Reference Conditions

Reference Condition Value

Oxygen Reference % 5

Temperature K 273.15

Page 5 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17

Document No.: NOLATL1061218 / 2018775 EPA Licence No.: W0001-04 EPA Licence No.: W0001-04




Executive Summary

Overall Results

Concentration

Mass Emission

Parameter Units Result MU +/- Blanks LimitCompli

antUnits

Run 1

Accreditation

LOD

TPM EN13284-1:2017 mg.m-3 1.98 1.05 <1.57 130 Yes kg.h-1

Result Limit Dates Time on Time off O2 Ref. (%)

Yes 1.75

CO EN15058:2017 mg.m-3 870.32 48.26 - - N/A kg.h-1

0.002 - 06/12/2018 09:00:00 09:30:00 5

NOx EN14792:2017 mg.m-3 398.4 29.43 - 500 Yes kg.h-1

0.77

Yes <1.80.352 - 06/12/2018 09:14:00 09:47:00 5

Yes <1.7- 06/12/2018 09:14:00 09:47:00 5

Yes <6.1

Oxygen (%) EN14789:2017 % v/v 5.06 0.13 - - N/A -

0.795 - 06/12/2018 09:14:00 09:47:00 5SO2 CEN/TS17021:2017 mg.m-3 898.86 53.71 - - N/A kg.h-1

Yes -

CO2 ISO12039 % v/v 10.98 0.35 - - N/A -

- - 06/12/2018 09:14:00 09:47:00 5

H2O EN14790:2017 % v/v 10.5 0.41 - - N/A -

-

N/A -- - 06/12/2018 08:30:00 09:00:00 5

Yes -- 06/12/2018 09:14:00 09:47:00 5

Yes -

Stack Gas Velocity EN16911:2013 m.s-1 20.35 0.81 - - N/A -

- - 06/12/2018 08:20:00 - 5Stack Gas Temperature K 621.15 - - - N/A -

Yes -

Volumetric Flow Rate m3.h-1 890 W0001-04 - 3,000 Yes -

- - 06/12/2018 08:20:00 - 5

Yes -

Volumetric Flow Rate (Ref) m3.h-1 884 - - 3,000 Yes -

- - - - - 5

Other -

Accreditation details

Air Scientific Limited INAB319T

External Analytical Laboratory UKAS1549

Yes -- - - - - 5

Page 6 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Run

Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

Run 1

Run 2

Run 3

Executive Summary

Monitoring Dates & Times

Parameter Location ID Sampling Dates Sampling Time On Sampling Time Off Duration (mins.)

-

- - - - -

Total Particulate Matter (TPM)

E1 06/12/2018 09:00:00 09:30:00 00:30:00

- - - -

-

- - - - -

Carbon Monoxide (CO)

E1 06/12/2018 09:14:00 09:47:00 00:33:00

- - - -

-

- - - - -

Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)

as NO2

E1 06/12/2018 09:14:00 09:47:00 00:33:00

- - - -

-

- - - - -

Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)

E1 06/12/2018 09:14:00 09:47:00 00:33:00

- - W0001-04 -

Water Vapour (%)

E1 06/12/2018 08:30:00 09:00:00 00:30:00

-

- - - - -

Oxygen (%)

E1 06/12/2018 09:14:00 09:47:00 00:33:00

- - - -

Stack Gas Velocity

E1 06/12/2018 08:20:00 - -

Stack Gas Temperature

E1 06/12/2018 08:20:00 - -

-

- - - - -

Carbon Dioxide (%)

E1 06/12/2018 09:14:00 09:47:00 00:33:00

- - - -

Page 7 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Executive Summary

Monitoring, Equipment & Analytical Methods

Parameter Monitoring Analysis

StandardTechnical Procedure

Accredited Testing

Testing Lab Analytical Technique INAB Analysis

Total Particulate Matter (TPM) EN13284-1:2017 SOP 2000 Yes SAL Gravimetric -

Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) CEN/TS 17021:2017 SOP 2046 Yes AirSci NDIR Absorption -

-

Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) EN14792:2017 SOP 2002 Yes AirSci Chemiluminescence -

Carbon Monoxide (CO) EN15058:2017 SOP 2004 Yes AirSci NCIR By Horiba PG-250

-

Carbon Dioxide ISO 12039:2001 SOP 2045 Yes AirSci - -

Oxygen (%) EN14789:2005 SOP 2008 Yes AirSci Paramagnetic

Stack Gas Temperature EN16911:2013 SOP 2005 Yes AirSci Thermocouple -

-Water Vapour (%) EN14790:2005 SOP 2007 Yes AirSci Gravimetric

-Stack Gas Velocity EN16911:2013 SOP 2005 Yes AirSci Pitot tubes

Page 8 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





W0001-04

List of Equipment

ID Item of Equipment Manufacturer Serial No.

ASLTM12EQ520 Buhler Sample Gas Cooler Buhler Technologies 100063602044367-001

ASLTM12EQ522 Ohaus Scales Ohaus 8732189114

ASLTM12EQ513 Horiba PG2500 Portable Gas Analzer Horiba ZVM969TT

ASLTM12EQ517 Testo 400 Gas Pressure Vacumn and Flow Testo 00828828/305

ASLTM14EQ512 GemRed Electronic Level 0 to 180 Degrees GemRed 8088

ASLTM14EQ513 ISO Stack Sampling Machine TCR Tecora 070205976 & 049039P

ASLTM12EQ526 Knob weights (200,500,1000mg) KERN & Sohn GmbH G1117388

ASLTM13EQ506 S TYPE PITOT TUBE Tecora O710

ASLTM16EQ507 K type thermocouple TC Direct 109710/1C

ASLTM14EQ516 6" Digital Calliper Stanley 052013w

ASLTM15EQ505 Mass flow meter Siargo A1K05286

Page 9 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Sampling Deviations

Parameter Deviation

Standard ID EN16911:2013 – flow rates in accordance with MID6911-1

Standard ID Due to the high velocity in the duct a smaller nozzle size was used than required by BS EN 13282-1 section 5.2.4 (6mm) to carry out isokinetic sampling.

Site Review (SR) SOP1015

Site Specific Protocol (SSP) SOP1015

Standard ID -

Standard ID -

Reference Documents

Risk Assessment (RA) SOP1011

Page 10 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





W0001-04Executive Summary

Suitability of sampling location

Platform Details

Irish EPA Technical Guidance Note AG1 / BS EN 15259 Platform Requirements

Value Comment

Sufficient Working area to manipulate probe and measuring instruments Yes -

General Information Value

Permanent/Temporary Temporary

Inside/ Outside Outside

Platform has chains / self closing gates at top of ladders Yes -

There are no obstructions present which hamper insertion of sampling equipment No -

Platform has 2 handrails (approx. 0.5m & 1.0 m high) Yes -

Platform has vertical base boards (approx. 0.25 m high) Yes -

Sampling Location / Platform Improvement Recommendations

None

BSEN 15259 Homogeneity Test Requirements

1: There is no requirement to perform a BSEN15259 Homogenity Test on this stack

Process details

Parameter

Safe Access Available Yes -

Easy Access Available Yes -

Feedstock LFG

Abatement System No

Abatement Systems Running Status N/A

Process status Normal

Capacity (per/hour) (if applicable) 150Kw

Continuous or Batch Process Continuous

Fuel Gas

Plume Appearance No

Other information None

Page 11 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





- -

- -

- -

- -

- -

-

-

-

-

-

-

Yes

-

Licensee

Reg. number W0001-03 Contractor Air Scientific Ltd.

Signature Signature -

Emissions point -

Site Contact Ms Ruth Baker Contractor's contact Amanda Sheridan

Role Role -

Type of process Load of process Abatement system List of Solvents used per process

Rotogravure Printing Bag filter - -

Cement Plant Electrostatic precipitator - - -

Electrical generation Cyclone - - -

Steam boiler Thermal oxidiser - - -

Other Active carbon bed - - -

NSCR - - -

SCR - - -

Dry scrubber - - -

Wet scrubber - - -

Lime injection - - -

Biofilter - - -

None - - -

Other: - - -

Page 12 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Executive Summary

Stack diagram

Page 13 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





II.

2. APPENDICES

Appendix I - Monitoring Personnel & Equipment

Stack Emissions Monitoring Personnel

Team Leader Name Dr. John Casey

-

Qualifications PhD. (Eng.), MSc. (Agr.), B. Agr. Sc.

System approval Air Scientific Limited Approved

Page 14 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





III.

Stack details Units Value

Date of survey 06/12/2018

Appendix II - Stack Details & flow characteristics

Preliminary stack survey calculations

General Stack Details

Stack Diameter / Depth, D m 0.2

Stack Width, W m -

Time of survey 08:20

Type Circular

Average Barometric Pressure, Pb kPa 99.4

Type of Pitot S

Average Stack Gas Temp., Ta C 348

Average Static Pressure, P static kPa 0.1

Negative flow No

Highly homogeneous flow stream/gas velocity Yes

Are Water Droplets Present? No

Average Pitot Tube Calibration Coeff, Cp 0.854

Final Pitot Leak Check Pa 18.2

Orientation of Duct Vertical

Sample Port Size mm 100

Initial Pitot Leak Check Pa 19.5

Number of Lines Used 1

Pitot Tube Cp 0.998

Number of Lines Available 1

Page 15 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Point Distance to duct (m) Pa Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Oxygen (%) Angle of Swirl

Sampling Line A

-

2 0.05 181 348 21.7 - <15

1 0.01 - - - -

<15

4 0.19 - - - - -

3 0.15 138 348 19 -

-

6 - - - - - -

5 - - - - -

-

8 - - - - - -

7 - - - - -

-

10 - - - - - -

9 - - - - -

<15

Min - 138 348 18.98 - <15

Average - 159.5 348 20.35 -

<15Max - 181 348 21.73 -

Page 16 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Sampling Line B

Angle of Swirl

1 - - - - - -

Point Distance to duct (m) Pa Temp oC Velocity (m/s) Oxygen (%)

-

3 - - - - - -

2 - - - - -

-

5 - - - - - -

4 - - - - -

-

7 - - - - - -

6 - - - - -

-

9 - - - - - -

8 - - - - -

-

Average - - - - - -

10 - - - - -

-

Max - - - - - -

Min - - - - -

Page 17 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Component Conc. ppm Conc. Dry % v/v Conc. Wet % v/v Molar Mass

Carbon Dioxide CO2 - 11.1 - 44.01

Oxygen O2 - 5.1 - 32

Nitrogen N2 - 83.8 - 28.1

Temperature oC 273.15

Total Pressure kPa 101.3

Moisture (H2O) - - 10.5 18.02

Moisture % -

Oxygen (Dry) % 5

Reference Conditions Units Numbers

Page 18 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Component Molar Mass M Density Kg/m3 pConc. Dry %

v/vDry Volume Fraction

r Dry Conc. kg/m3 piConc. wet %

v/v

Stack Gas Composition & Molecular Weights

Wet Volume Fraction r Wet Conc. kg/m3 pi

Carbon Dioxide CO2 44.01 1.96 11.1 0.111 0.22 9.93 0.1 0.2

Oxygen O2 32 1.43 5.1 0.051 0.07 4.56 0.05 0.07

0.11 0.08

where p=M/22.41

pi = r x p

75 0.75 0.94

Moisture (H2O) 18.02 0.8 - - - 10.5

Nitrogen N2 28.1 1.25 83.8 0.838 1.05

Page 19 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Wet Density (STP), P STW kg.m-3 1.29

Dry Density (Actual), P Actual kg.m-3 0.579

Calculation of Stack Gas Densities

Determinant Units Result

Dry Density (STP), P STD kg.m-3 1.342

P STD = sum of component concentrations, kg/m3 (excluding water vapour)

P STW = (P STD + pi of H2O) / ( 1 + (pi of H2O / 0.8036))

P actual = P STD x (T STP / (P STP)) x (Pa / Ta)

Average wet Density (Actual), P Actual W kg.m-3 0.557

Where

P actual W (at each sampling point) = P STW x (Ts / Ps) x (Pa / Ta)

Page 20 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





0.40 0.81

Lowest Differential Pressure 138 Pa >5 Pa Yes EN16911:2013

Sampling Plane Validation Criteria Value Units Requirement Compliance Method

Highest Gas Velocity 21.73 m/s - N/A -

Lowest Gas Velocity 18.98 m/s - N/A -

Mean Velocity 20.35 m/s - N/A -

Ratio of Above 1.15 :1 <3:1 Yes EN16911:2013

No local negative flow No - - Yes -

Angle of flow with regard to duct axis <15 degrees < 15 Yes EN16911:2013

Calculation of stack Gas Velocity, V

Velocity at Traverse Point, V = Kcp * Sqroot ((2 * DP ) / Density) 572.8922846

Homogeneous flow stream/gas velocity Yes - - Yes -

Gas Volumetric Flowrate Units Result

Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (Actual) m3.h-1 2302

Where

Kpt = Pitot tube calibration coefficient 0.854

Compressibility correction factor, assumed at a constant 0.998 0.998

Gas Volumetric Flowrate REF to Oxygen m3.h-1 884

Standard uncertainty of velocity (m/s) Expanded uncertainty of velocity (m/s) Volume flow rate expanded uncertainty (m3/hr) 107

Gas Volumetric Flow Rate (STP, Wet) m3.h-1 994

Gas Volumetric Flowrate (STP, Dry) m3.h-1 890

Page 21 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





IV.

Stack ID E1 Time Off 09:30:00

Appendix 3 - Individual parameter sampling details and results

Total Particulate Matter Sampling details and results

Run 1 Time On 09:00:00

Finish Dry Gas Meter - m3 Pressure at Pump 99.5 kPa

Filter ID E1 Uncertainty Data

Start Dry Gas Meter - m3 Temperature at Pump 13 Deg C

Moisture Content 10.5 % Humidity at Pumps 0.1 %

Average Stack Temperature 348 0C Air Volume at Pump 0.216 m3

Volume of Air Sampled 0.2 m3 (VgN) Front End Weight <0.3 mg

Stack Flow Rate STP, Dry 890 m3.h-1 Filter Weight 0.14 mg

300.0 - W0001-04

Balance Calibration Weight

1000.0 - g

500.0 - g

1 - - -

Inpinger Weights Initial Final Difference

3 - - -

2 - - -

Volume of Air Sampled 0.2 Nm3

4 - - -

Leak Check Results Result % Leak

Moisture Content (EN 14790) 0 %

After Blank 0.12 l/min 0.8

Before Blank 0.1 l/min 0.6

After Sample 1 0.14 l/min 0.9

Before Sample 1 0.11 l/min 0.7

Standard Maximum 0.32 l/min 2%

Average Flow Rate 16 l/min 0.9

Leak check acceptable Yes Yes/No

Back Pressure - bar -

Standard Criteria to be Met Result Standard Requirement

Water droplets present No Yes/No

Angle of Flow <15 <15 Degrees

Negative Flow in the Stack None None

Pitot Pressure Difference >5Pa >5Pa

Ratio of Flow Measurement 1.31 <3:1

Page 22 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Positive Pressure Pass

Pitot Tube Leak Check Result

Number of Ports 1

Negative Pressure Pass

Straight length before sample point > 5 > 5 Hydraulic Diameters

Straight length after sample point > 5 > 5 Hydraulic Diameters

Blank (Filter and Front Wash Combined) <0.35 mg

Sample Calculations

Volume of Air Sampled 0.22 Nm3

Sample 1 (Filter and Front Combined) 0.44 mg

Sample Result 1.97 mg.m-3

Blank Result <1.57 mg.m-3

Blank as Percentage of ELV 1.2 % Standard Requirement <10% ELV

Emission Limit Value 130 mg.m-3

Isokinetic Variation % -0.37

Isokinetic Criterion Compliance

Iso Kineticity Acceptable - Yes

Allowable Isokinetic Range % 95-115

Page 23 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Total Particulates Quality Assurance

Stack ID E1

Parameter Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Blank Blank Blank

- -

Sampling Dates - 06/12/2018 - - - - -

Sampling Times - 09:00:00 - - -

- -

Volume Sampled (REF.)

m3 0.2 - - - - -

Sampling Device - Basic - - -

- -

Probe rinse ID - E1w - - - - -

Filter ID Number - E1 - - -

- -

Probe Rinse Solids Mass

mg <0.3 - - - - -

Total Filter Mass mg 0.14 - - -

- -

General information

Total Mass Collected mg 0.44 - - -

Technical Procedure - 2000 - - - - -

Standard ISEN13284-1

Probe Material - SS - - - - -

- -

Positioning of Filter - In-stack - - - -

Filter Housing - SS - - -

-

Filter Size and Material

-47mm filter, 4mm nozzle

- - - - -

Number of Sampling lines used

- 1 - - - - -

- -Number of Sampling

Points used- 2 - - -

Page 24 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Stack ID E1

Carbon Monoxide Quality Assurance

Sampling Details

Parameter Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Sampling Times - 09:13 - -

Sampling Dates - 06/12/2018 - -

Instrument Range ppm 1000 - -

Quality Assurance Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Span Gas Value ppm 616 - -

Acceptable Gas Range - Yes - -

Conditioning Unit Temperature 0C 2 - -

Average Temperature < 0C 2 - -

Pump flow rate l/min 0.4 - -

Allowable Temperature - 4 - -

Temperature Acceptable - Yes - -

Zero Drift Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Zero Down Sampling Line (Pre) ppm 1 - -

Zero Down Sampling Line (Post) ppm 4 - -

Zero Drift ppm 3 - -

Span Drift Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Allowable Zero Drift ppm 12 - -

Zero Drift Acceptable (Y/N) Yes - -

Span Down Sampling Line (Pre) ppm 616 - -

Span Down Sampling Line (Post) ppm 618 - -

Span Drift Acceptable (Y/N) Yes - -

Span Drift ppm 2 - -

Allowable Span Drift ppm 12 - -

Leak Check Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Span Gas Conc. ppm 616 - -

Test Conditions Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Recorded Conc. down Line ppm 616 - -

Leak check acceptable (< 2%) (Y/N) Yes - -

Run Ambient Temperature Range 0C 13 - -

Page 25 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Parameter Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Mean

Carbon Monoxide Results & Sampling Details

-

Uncertainty mg.m-3 48.26 - - -

Concentration mg.m-3 866.95 - - -

General Sampling Information

Parameter Value

Standard EN15058

Mass Emission kg.h-1 0.77 - -

Heated Head Filter Used Yes

Heated Line Temperature 190

Span Gas Reference Number ASLTM18ING515

Technical Procedure SOP2004

Probe material SS

Filtration Type/Size PTFE

Span Gas Uncertainty (%) <2

Zero Gas Type Nitrogen

Number of Sampling Lines Used 1

Span Gas Expiry Date 21-Dec

Span Gas Start Pressure (bar) 60

Gas Cylinder Concentration (ppm) 616

Oxygen 5

Temperature (K) 273.15

Pressure (kPa) 101.3

Gas (Wet or Dry) Dry

Number of Sampling Points Used 1

Sample Point I.D's E1


Page 26 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





W0001-04

Carbon Monoxide Trend

620

640

660

680

700

720

740

760

pp

m

Time

Run 1

Page 27 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Carbon Monoxide Measurement Uncertainty

Measured Quantities Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3

Measured Reading ppm 693.56 - -

Certified Range of Analyser ppm 1.36-1000 - -

Operational Range of Analyser ppm 1000 - -


Nonlinearity % 0.9 - -

Temperature Dependent Zero drift % 0.14 - -

Temperature Dependent Span drift % -0.12 - -

Calibration Gas Uncertainty % <2 - -

Cross-sensitivity % 0.08 - -

Leak % 0 - -

Parameter Units W0001-04 Run 2 Run 3

Combined uncertainty mg.m-3 11.34 - -

Uncertainty corrected to std conds. mg.m-3 48.26 - -

Expanded uncertainty mg.m-3 22.68 - -

Expanded uncertainty expressed with a level of confidence of 95%

% of value 5.57 - -


% of ELV - - -

Expanded uncertainty expressed with a level of confidence of 95% mg.m-3 48.26 - -

Requirement in standard is for uncertainty to be < 10% at ELV at standard conditions

Page 28 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Stack ID E1

Oxides of Nitrogen Quality Assurance

Sampling Details






Span Gas Value ppm 160.7 - -








Zero Down Sampling Line (Pre) ppm 0.1 - -

Zero Down Sampling Line (Post) ppm 0.1 - -



Allowable Zero Drift ppm 3.2 - -


Span Down Sampling Line (Pre) ppm 160.7 - -

Span Down Sampling Line (Post) ppm 160.4 - -


Span Drift ppm 0.3 - -

Allowable Span Drift ppm 3.2 - -


Span Gas Conc. ppm 160.7 - -

Recorded Conc. down Line ppm 160.7 - -




Page 29 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17




Office: Trim Rev.No: 1Oxides of Nitrogen Results & Sampling Details



Mass Emission kg.h-1 0.35 - - -


Technical Procedure SOP2002

Probe material SS



Parameter Value

Standard EN14792


Span Gas Expiry Date 19-May




Date & Result of last converter check 95.4 02/09/2018




Gas Cylinder Concentration (ppm) 160.7


Zero Gas Type N


Oxygen 5




Page 30 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





W0001-04

Oxides of Nitrogen Trend

0.000

50.000

100.000

150.000

200.000

250.000

300.000

pp

m

Time

Run 1

Page 31 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Oxides of Nitrogen Measurement Uncertainty



Certified Range of Analyser ppm 0.87 to 1000 - -




Temperature Dependent Zero drift % -0.04 - -

Temperature Dependent Span drift % -0.25 - -


Leak % 0 - -

NOx Converter Efficiency % W0001-04 - -

Calibration Gas Uncertainty % <2 - -

Mass Flow Controllers (Dilution) Uncertainty % <1 - -







% of value 7.42 - -


% of ELV 5.89 - -


Page 32 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Stack ID E1

Sulphur Dioxide Quality Assurance

Sampling Details






Span Gas Value ppm 552 - -








Zero Down Sampling Line (Pre) ppm 1 - -

Zero Down Sampling Line (Post) ppm 8 - -



Allowable Zero Drift ppm 27 - -


Span Down Sampling Line (Pre) ppm 552 - -

Span Down Sampling Line (Post) ppm 558 - -


Span Drift ppm 6 - -

Allowable Span Drift ppm 27 - -


Span Gas Conc. ppm 552 - -

Recorded Conc. down Line ppm 552 - -




Page 33 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Sulphur Dioxide Results & Sampling Details



Mass Emission kg.h-1 0.79 - - -


Technical Procedure -

Probe material SS



Parameter Value

Standard -


Span Gas Expiry Date Dec-18




Date & Result of last converter check -




Gas Cylinder Concentration (ppm) 552


Zero Gas Type N


Oxygen 5




Page 34 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





W0001-04

Sulphur Dioxide Trend

306

308

310

312

314

316

318

pp

m

Time

Run 1

Page 35 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Page 36 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Sulphur Dioxide Measurement Uncertainty



Certified Range of Analyser ppm 2.14 to 1000 - -




Temperature Dependent Zero drift % 0.8 - -

Temperature Dependent Span drift % 2 - -

Calibration Gas Uncertainty % <2 % - -


Leak % 0 - -

Parameter Units W0001-04 Run 2 Run 3






% of value 6 - -


% of ELV - - -


Page 37 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Stack ID E1

Oxygen Quality Assurance

Sampling Details































Combined uncertainty % vol 0.13 - -

% of value % 2.53 - -

Expanded uncertainty % of value 5.05 - -

Expanded uncertainty % vol 0.26 - -

Page 38 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





W0001-04

Oxygen trend

4.6

4.7

4.8

4.9

5

5.1

5.2

pp

m

Time

Run 1

Page 39 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Stack ID E1

Carbon Dioxide Quality Assurance

Sampling Details































Combined uncertainty % vol 0.17 - -

% of value % 1.57 - -

Expanded uncertainty % of value 3.14 - -

Expanded uncertainty % vol 0.35 - -

Page 40 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





-

Concentration % 10.98 - - -

Carbon Dioxide Results & Sampling Details



Parameter Value

Standard ISO10239

Uncertainty % 0.35 - -




Technical Procedure 2045

Probe material SS

Filtration Type/Size Ceramic


Zero Gas Type N


Span Gas Expiry Date 23-Feb


Gas Cylinder Concentration (ppm) 15.2

Oxygen 5







Page 41 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





W0001-04

Carbon Dioxide Trend

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

11

pp

m

Time

Run 1

Page 42 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Page 43 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17





Method: EN 14790

Moisture Results & Sampling Details

Title: Determination of Moisture

Test Time 08:30 09:00 Pressure at Pump 101.3 kPa

Stack Name E1 Time off Temperature at Pump 0 Deg C

Dry Gas Meter Reading After - m3

Dry Gas Meter Reading Before - m3 Humidity at Pumps 0.1 %

Normalised Air Volume Sampled 0.105 Nm3

Volume of Air Sampled - m3

Balance Calibration Weight

Leak Rate 0.001

1000.0 1000 g

200.0 200 g

1 485.1 489.7 4.6

Inpinger Weights Initial Final Difference

3 455.9 457.6 1.7

2 439.2 442.3 3.1

Volume of Air Sampled 0.105 Nm3 9.9

4 644.1 644.6 0.5

Combined uncertainty 0.21 mg.m-3

Moisture Content (EN 14790) 10.5 %

Expanded uncertainty as percentage of limit value - % ELV

Expanded uncertainty as a 3.91 % measured value

Expanded uncertainty in units of measurement 0.41 mg.m-3

Page 44 of 44

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17

Concept Life Sciences

Certificate of Analysis

Hadfield HouseHadfield Street

CornbrookManchester

M16 9FETel : 0161 874 2400Fax : 0161 874 2404

Report Number: 790672-1

Date of Report: 02-Jan-2019

Customer: Air ScientificUnit 32 Degranville CourtDublin RoadTrimCo. MeathIreland.

Customer Contact: Project Management

Customer Job Reference: NOLATL1061218Date Job Received at Concept: 14-Dec-2018

Date Analysis Started: 17-Dec-2018Date Analysis Completed: 02-Jan-2019

The results reported relate to samples received in the laboratory and may not be representative of a wholebatch.Opinions and interpretations expressed herein are outside the scope of UKAS accreditationThis report should not be reproduced except in full without the written approval of the laboratoryTests covered by this certificate were conducted in accordance with Concept Life Sciences SOPsAll results have been reviewed in accordance with Section 25 of the Concept Life Sciences, AnalyticalServices Quality Manual

This document has been printed from a digitally signed master copy

Concept Life Sciences is a trading name of

Concept Life Sciences Analytical & Development

Services Limited registered in England and

Wales (No 2514788)

1549

Report checkedand authorised by :Kathryn GleavesCustomer Service Advisor

Issued by :Kathryn GleavesCustomer Service Advisor

Page 1 of 2

790672-1

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17

Index to symbols used in 790672-1

Concept Reference: 790672

Customer Reference: NOLATL1061218

Filter Quartz 47mm Analysed as Filter Quartz 47mm

Miscellaneous

Concept Reference 790672 001 790672 003

Customer Sample Reference E1 Blank

Test Sample AR AR

Date Sampled 06-DEC-2018 06-DEC-2018

Determinand Method LOD Units Symbol

Particulates (Total) Grav (5 Dec) 0.05 mg U 0.14 <0.05

Concept Reference: 790672

Customer Reference: NOLATL1061218

Wash(DI) Analysed as Wash(DI)

Miscellaneous

Concept Reference 790672 002 790672 004

Customer Sample Reference E1 W Blank W

Test Sample AR AR

Date Sampled 06-DEC-2018 06-DEC-2018

Determinand Method LOD Units Symbol

Particulates (Total) Grav 0.3 mg U <0.3 <0.3

Value Description

AR As Received

U Analysis is UKAS accredited

This document has been printed from a digitally signed master copy

Produced by Concept Life Sciences, Hadfield House, Hadfield Street, Cornbrook, Manchester, M16 9FE Page 2 of 2

790672-1

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17

of 31

Appendix G: PRTR Report 2018

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:17

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18

of 31

Appendix H: Topographical Survey 2018

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18

SLOPE STABILTY ASSESSMENT FOR

NORTH KERRY LANDFILL

KERRY COUNTY COUNCIL

JUNE 2018

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18

SLOPE STABILTY ASSESSMENT FOR NORTH KERRY LANDFILL

Completed by: Paul O’Connor (Chartered Engineer) Kerry County Council Site Inspection: 18th May 2018

Keywords: Slope, Stability, Assessment, Muingnaminnane, Kerry.

Abstract: Kerry County Council carried out a slope stability assessment of the landfill side

slopes at North Kerry Landfill in order to comply with Condition 8.11.1 of Waste Licence W0001-04 (IED).

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1

1.1 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................... 1 1.3 PREVIOUS SLOPE STABILITY ASSESSMENTS ....................................................................... 1 1.4 SITE WALKOVER ...................................................................................................... 2

2 CONDITIONS OF SURVEY........................................................................................3

3 SLOPE STABILITY OBSERVATIONS .........................................................................4

3.1 CELLS 17, 18 AND 19 .............................................................................................. 4 3.2 CELLS 1 TO 16....................................................................................................... 6

4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................................8 LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix 1: Slope Location Plan

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18

Section 1 Kerry County Council North Kerry Landfill: Slope Stability Assessment

Page 1 of 11

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

Kerry County Council undertake a slope stability assessment of W0001-01 North Kerry Landfill, Muingnaminnane, Tralee Co. Kerry. An independent Environmental Consultancy undertook the previous slope stability assessment for the landfill during March 2017.

This 2018 assessment is in accordance with Condition 8.11.1 of the EPA waste licence issued to the site (Current IED Licence No: W0001-04)

1.2 Site Description

The facility is situated in north County Kerry, approximately 11 km west of the town of Tralee in the townland of Muingnaminnane.

The site was developed as a municipal landfill facility and recycling centre. The site ceased receiving waste for deposition in 2014. Kerry County Council is currently undertaking various works associated with the sites aftercare.

Kerry County Council’s Chartered Engineer completed a site walkover of the site on 18th May 2018 to examine the existing landfill slopes at North Kerry Landfill. All slopes within the site were inspected as part of the visual assessment with written and photographic notes taken. Slopes were inspected on foot generally traversing from toe to crest across the entire length of the slope.

The heavy growth of vegetation and grass was cut back during Q4 2017 and Q1 2018 where the landfill cap at Cells 1 – 19 were flailed. Long grasses, scrubland and rushes with some trees and larger bushes were cut back. Re-profiling and installation of drainage within the landfill cap across Cells 1 to 16 to shed runoff was completed in Q1 2018 which has substantially reduced surcharge loading.

No visibly unstable slopes were observed on the site and no tension cracks were observed in any of the slopes which may have suggested potential instability.

1.3 Previous Slope Stability Assessments A previous slope stability assessment for the landfill was undertaken during March 2017. The reported issues noted during this visual assessment in 2017 have since been completed as outlined below:

1. Vegetation growth on slopes to be cut back and maintained such that more effective visual

inspections can be completed on the landfill slopes for future annual inspections as required by the conditions attached to IED Licence No. W0001-04.

2. Re-profiling and installation of drainage within the landfill cap across Cells 1 to 16 to shed

runoff, improve trafficability and reduce surcharge loading. The localised depressions noted across the capping may have been caused by settlement following waste degradation or additional surcharge loading caused by the waterlogging of the capping material.

Where areas are noticeably waterlogged waste below the liner may also be saturated in the event that the cap liner has been compromised. If materials above the cap liner remain saturated there is an increased risk of a translational failures. If the waste is saturated there is an increased risk of a rotational failure within the waste body as any tension cracks that develop become water filled allowing water ingress deeper into the slope.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18


Page 2 of 11

1.4 Site Walkover Kerry County Council completed a site walkover of the site on the 18th May 2018. All slopes within the site were inspected as part of the visual assessment with written and photographic notes taken. Slopes were inspected on foot generally traversing from toe to crest across the entire length of the slope.

All slopes were assessed for signs of instability or identification of potential factors which may impact the future stability of the landfill slopes.

A Site Layout Plan is included in Appendix 1 to this document.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18


Page 3 of 11

2 CONDITIONS OF SURVEY

The condition survey completed was limited to a visual inspection of the exposed elements of the landfill slopes only and limited to readily accessible areas. The purpose of the condition survey was to assess and advise of issues relating to the stability of the landfill slopes as required by Waste License W0001-04 (IED).

No intrusive investigations or prolonged monitoring of defective areas were carried out by Kerry County Council. No structural analyses, testing or measurements were undertaken when compiling this report. This report reflects Kerry County Councils interpretation of the site condition from a visual inspection only.

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18


Page 4 of 11

3 SLOPE STABILITY OBSERVATIONS

3.1 CELLS 17, 18 and 19

Cells 17, 18 and 19 are shown in the Appendix 1: Site Layout Plan. These cells are the most recently filled and capped cells.

The main slopes were observed to be vegetated by grass.

Photo 1 – Cells 17, 18 & 19

Reprofiling of a small section of the service track along Cell 17 (Side slope to access road) (Side slope to access road) at the South West slope (to the rear of site office). There were no other indications of translational or rotational instabilities observed.

Photo 1 – Cells 17, 18 & 19 Photo 2 – Southwest Slope

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18


Page 5 of 11

Photo 3 – Southeast Slope Photo 4 – Ridge along Cell 17

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18


Page 6 of 11

3.2 CELLS 1 to 16

Cells 1 to 16, the oldest in the landfill, are shown in Appendix A: Site Layout Plan. All cells in this area have been capped. The slopes to cells 1 to 16 vary in steepness from 1:1 to 1:10 approximately. The slopes were vegetated with scrubland and rushes which have been cut back and maintained in Q4 2017 and Q1 2018 making it easier to transverse through the capping.

The slopes are considered to be stable.

Photo 5 – Cells 1 to 16

Photo 6: New drainage channels on capping Photo 7: Flailed capping and well maintained side slopes

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18

of 11


Photo 8: Slopes to Cells 3/4 Photo 9: Slopes to Cells 9/10

Photo 10: Slopes to Cell 16 Photo 11: Slopes to Cell 15a/b

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18

of 11


4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Kerry County Council completed a site walkover and visual slope stability assessment of North Kerry Landfill on the 18th May 2018.All slopes were walked in a toe to crest survey, photographed and examined for indications of instability.

The results of this visual assessment indicate that the landfill body main slopes are generally considered to be stable. Reprofiling of a small section of the service track along Cell 17 (Side slope to access road) at the South West slope (to the rear of site office) is to be completed by the end of 2018. Kerry County Council will ensure that:

1. Reprofiling of a small section of the service track along Cell 17 (Side slope to access road) at the South West slope (to the rear of site office).

2. The vegetation growth on the slopes must be flailed and maintained every 2 years which will ensure

effective visual inspections are completed on the landfill slopes as required by the conditions attached to IED Licence No. W0001-04.As such any hidden hazards such as gas well enclosures below ground level (which may be hidden by vegetation) are identified.

3. Maintenance of the recently constructed drainage system within the landfill caps which help runoff,

improve trafficability and reduce surcharge loading.

________________________ Paul O’Connor Chartered Engineer Environmental Services Kerry County Council 21st June 2018

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18

APPENDIX 1

Site Location Plan

For

insp

ectio

n pur

pose

s only

.

Conse

nt of

copy

right

owne

r req

uired

for a

ny ot

her u

se.

EPA Export 29-03-2019:03:30:18

Comhairle Contae Chiarraí · Class 10 The treatment of any waste on land with a consequential...

Documents

Transcript of Comhairle Contae Chiarraí · Class 10 The treatment of any waste on land with a consequential...