COLS NEWSLETTER - upes.ac.in · PDF fileBiswaroop Mukherjee Devashish Jain Girdhar Khattar ......
Transcript of COLS NEWSLETTER - upes.ac.in · PDF fileBiswaroop Mukherjee Devashish Jain Girdhar Khattar ......
EDITORIAL BOARD
Chairman:
Dr. Tabrez Ahmad
Faculty-in-Charge:
Dr. Sujata Bali
Media Coordinator:
Ms. Charu Srivastava
Ed-in-Chief:
Shatrunjay Bose
Associate Editors:
Sumaiya Saleem
Nishith Upadhyaya
Aprajita Gupta
Managing Editor:
Saif Rahman Ansari
Senior Assistant Editors:
Aniket Chatterjee
Anushka Dhawan
Neha Singh
Assistant Editors:
Ankita Agarwal
Anushtha Srivastava
Biswaroop Mukherjee
Devashish Jain
Girdhar Khattar
Krishna Pallavi
Saransh Vijay
COLS NEWSLETTER Dec., 2015- Jan., 2016
FROM THE CHANCELLOR’S DESK…
It is very heartening to note that COLS Newsletter the face of COLS
activities, has come up with yet another issue.
The growth of CoLS, the youngest of the three
Colleges of UPES is consistently reflected through
the sections of Campus News, Students’ achievement
and Faculty achievements. The photographic
glimpses of CoLS activities bring out the pleasant
visual presentation of systematic and diverse CoLS
activities.
The CoLS Newsletter also highlights the latest legal
developments with an eye for interesting and impactful news in this
discipline providing insight to the reader of contemporary issues.
I also must appreciate that the hardwork put in by our students and
faculty members has ensured that COLS scales new heights year after
year.
Many Congratulations to the CoLS Newsletter Team for keeping the
Newsletter ongoing!
Wishing the Team CoLS Newsletter continued success!
Dr. S. J. Chopra
Chancellor,
UPES
Highlights
Courtroom Drama 2 Know Your Faculty 8
Law and Beyond 3 Know Your Alumnus 9
As we see it 4 Students’ Achievements 10
Beyond Bar & Bench 5 Campus News 11
Around the Globe 6 Faculty Achievements 12
Opportunities 7 CoLS at a Glance 13
Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
2 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Courtroom Drama
SC: SARFAESI Act cannot nullify the
existence of Rent Control Acts in India.
Declaring that a landlord cannot do indirectly
what he has been restricted from doing under the
Rent Control Act, the Hon’ble Apex Court bench
comprising of Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Gopala
Gowda and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amitava Roy, in
the case of Vishal N. Kalsaria v. Bank of India &
Ors. Criminal Appeal No.52 of 2016, arising out
of SLP (Crl.) No. 8060 of 2015 ruled that
(SARFAESI) Act does not override the provisions
of Rent Control Act by the virtue of Section 35.
The Appellant were tenants in respect of a
property which was mortgaged by the landlord as
a security in the Bank of India. The bank
proceeded under the Section 13 and Section 14 of
SARFAESI Act on the non-payment of dues, to
obtain the possession of mortgaged property
which was currently in the possession of the
Appellant. The Magistrate relied on Harshad
Goverdhan Sondagar v. International Assets
Reconstruction Co. Ltd. Criminal Appeal No.
736/2014, arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.)
No.1666/2012, and held that the possession of the
land can be recovered by the secured creditor
under SARFAESI Act and thus, the Rent Control
laws cannot bind the bank.
Supreme Court of India rejected the contention of
the bank and ruled that all the provisions of
SARFAESI Act extends to the laws operating in
the same field and hence, the Rent Control Acts in
India do not fall in the ambit of Section 35 of the
said Act. The Hon’ble Court also said that the
Bank of India is not at the liberty to evict the
tenants from the land which has reserved as a
collateral security, on the non-payment of dues by
the landlord.
Courtesy: livelaw.com
SC: Perjury proceeding against Forensic
Expert in the Jessica Lal Case set aside.
In the case of Prem Sagar Manocha v. State NCT
of Delhi Criminal Appeal No. 9-10/2016 arising
from SLP (Crl.) No. 7153-7154/2013, the
Supreme Court of India set aside the perjury
proceedings initiated under Section 340 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, against the
forensic expert in the Jessica Lal Murder case.
According to the High Court of Delhi, Prem Sagar
Manocha, the ballistic expert departed from his
stand taken in the oral testimony and submitted a
different written opinion, for the benefit of the
accused, Manu Sharma and helped him in
obtaining his acquittal. According to Manocha’s
report, there were two firearms used to fire two
different cartridges. His opinion however was
non-specific and indefinite in the trial court due to
the non-availability of suspected firearm.
The Forensic Expert gave a scientific opinion after
examining the cartridges as to whether they have
been fired from the same firearm or not. The
Supreme Court of India observed the absence of
firearm for proper examination and held that a
closer scrutiny is required to initiate proceedings
under Section 340. The Hon’ble Apex Court ruled
in favor of the forensic expert and stated that the
mere contention of the High Court that the
opinion given by the Expert was not definite and
conclusive does not render the expert evidence to
be false evidence under Section 193 of Indian
Penal Code, 1860. Thus, there exist no reasonable
grounds to initiate perjury proceeding against the
expert evidence.
Courtesy: The Indian Express
3 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Law & Beyond
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of
Children) Act, 2015 Passed in India
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of
Children) Act, 2015 was passed by the Rajya Sabha
in the Winter Session of the Parliament in
December, 2015.
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of
Children) Amendment Bill, was introduced in the
Parliament in 2014, as a result of the public outrage
that arose because one of the offenders of the
infamous Delhi gang rape case of 2012 was a few
months short of 18 years of age and according to the
then law, would be released after 3 years of stay in
Special Home.
Earlier, the Act (amended in 2000) classified
offences conducted by Juvenile as serious and non-
serious but did not provide any clear definition for
the two. However, in the new Amended Act of 2015,
offences have clearly been categorised as petty,
serious and heinous. While the petty and serious
offences will be inquired and punished by the
Juvenile Justice Board, for the heinous offences, the
Board can only conduct a preliminary inquiry about
the physical and mental abilities of the juvenile and
his knowledge to foresee the consequences of the
offence he has committed. Final decision in such
cases will be pronounced by the Children’s Courts.
Children below the age of 18 years who are alleged
or found to commit an offence are defined as
‘children in conflict with law’. The demand of the
public was to lower the age of juvenile from 18
years but India could not do so because it is bound
by the Convention on the Rights of the Child
(CORC) framed by the UNICEF which defined the
child as a person below the age of 18. India could
not submit to the demand of the public that asked for
death penalty to those who committed heinous
offences such as rape and murder.
However, the Act allows the courts to try juveniles
as adults for heinous crimes such as rapes and
murder, and punish accordingly.
Courtesy: PRS India
Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill
2016 Passed by Rajya Sabha
The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Bill
2016, that aims to protect the interests of
homebuyers and enhance the credibility of the
construction sector, was passed unanimously in the
Rajya Sabha. It also aims to promote transparency,
accountability and efficiency in the Real Estate
Sector.
The Bill proposes to establish a State Real Estate
Regulatory Authority (RERA), after ratification of
the Act in every state of the country, as a
government authority to redress the grievances
against any builder. The RERA will have the
authority to govern both residential and commercial
real estate transactions, and will make it compulsory
for the developers to give all information about the
project plan, government approvals, land title status
and schedule for completion to the RERA and then
RERA shall pass this information to the consumers.
The Bill clearly defines Carpet Area, therefore,
making the practice of selling on the basis of
ambiguous super built-up area for a real estate
project illegal. Also, in case the developer delays a
project, he will be liable to pay the same interest to
the consumer that the latter pays as EMI to the bank.
Main feature of this Bill is that the developer has to
deposit 70% of the collections from the buyers in a
separate bank account thus ensuring that he is not
able to invest in numerous projects with the booking
money of one project which earlier used to lead to
delay in completion and handover to consumers.
The Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty
Alleviation came up with this Bill to address the
notoriety in the Real Estate Sector and to enhance
the flow of investments.
Courtesy: The Hindu and The Economic Times
4 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
As We See It: Indian Tax Authorities Clarify Taxation of EPC/Turnkey
Agreements
The Indian Central Board of Direct Taxes ("CBDT") as of late issued a Circular No.7 of
2016 ("Circular") to give clarity and direction to citizens on the circumstances in which
individuals from a consortium framed to execute an Engineering, Procurement and
Construction ("EPC") and/or a turnkey contract may not be described as an Association of
Persons ("AoP") under the Indian Income Tax Act, 1961 ("ITA").The Circular comes in the
wake of a few clashing decisions with reference to CIT v. Oriental Structural Engineers Pvt.
Ltd., ITA Nos. 444 & 445 of 2014 that was rendered by Indian legal powers on the topic of
whether a consortium shaped to execute expansive base undertakings ought to be portrayed
as an AoP under the ITA, and in like manner be made subject to the going with Indian
charge outcomes.
This issue is of specific pertinence where a consortium includes non-occupants as the
presence of an AoP can uncover a substantial part of a consortium's salary to tax collection
in India, including that identifying with the exercises which may not be attempted in India.
With reference to CIT v. Balkrishna, 39 ITR 546, an AoP is a different assessable element
under the ITA and is considered to appear when two or more persons join together in like
manner reason or normal activity with the object of creating income. Income earned by an
AoP is typically assessable in the hands of the AoP at the most extreme peripheral rate. An
AoP is esteemed to be an occupant of India where its control or administration is not
arranged entirely outside India.
In this foundation, Circular No.7 of 2016 expresses that a consortium game plan for
executing EPC/turnkey contracts which has the accompanying characteristics may not be
dealt with as an AoP. The Circular likewise clears up that there might be other extra
components which might legitimize that a consortium is not an AoP, which would need to
be analyzed on a case by case premise.
The Kelkar Committee Report on "Returning to and Revitalizing Public Private
Partnership Model in Infrastructure" has suggested the advancement of air terminals, ports
and railroads through the Public Private Partnership Model. The Circular denote a stage in
that course and is an endeavor to realize consistency in the utilization of Indian duty rules,
with a perspective to accomplishing the previously stated destinations. To the degree that
the aim was for those elements to be adequate to evade formation of an AoP, the drafting
decision of "might" can bring up issues in the matter of whether this gives the assessment
powers a window to ask further. On a more positive note, the Circular further expresses that
consortium individuals might share contract cost at a gross level to encourage
accommodation in charging and allows regular administration for the purpose of
authoritative comfort and these coordination between gatherings.
Courtesy: www.nishithdesai.com.
5 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Beyond Bar & Bench: News from the profession
‘Big Law Disrupter’ Collyer started in
Singapore by NLSIU alumnus, to focus on
India-Singapore deal corridor
NLSIU Bangalore 2001 alumnus Azmul Haque
left Olswang Singapore in September to start up
Collyer Law, in Singapore. NLSIU batch mate
Palash Gupta joined Collyer as India Desk head,
and former Duane Morris & Selvam partner James
Wong joined as Director.
The firm will counsel start-ups and small
businesses. The main focus has been expressed to
be on the India-Singapore deal corridor, through
advising on company formation, seed and venture
capital, employment law, intellectual property,
corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions,
technology transactions, private equity and
international arbitration.
Collyer is the first Indian-qualified lawyer-
founded law firm in Singapore to be given a
license to practice Singapore law, and as Haque
adds in an email, “the firm does not bill clients
according to hourly rates”, and that there are “no
junior associates handling work meant for
Partners”
Courtesy: barandbench.com
Changes in the CCI dynamism, new Chairman
appointed; ex-chairman hired by CAM
Hundreds applied to replace Mr. Ashok Chawla as
the Chairman of CCI, owing to his retirement.
Mr. Devender Kumar Sikri, a former Gujarat
cadre IAS officer has been chosen to succeed
Chawla in the fair trade regulation body. Sikri will
have tenure of about two and a half years, as
reported.
Previously, Mr. Sikri has also been the Secretary
in the Ministry of Women and Child
Development, Registrar General of Census and
Collector of Rajkot and Jamnagar, among others.
Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas (CAM) appointed
Ashok Chawla, ex-CCI-Chairman, as its strategic
advisory board member, effective January 15,
2016. He has also been mandated to assist CAM
with advocacy and policy advice. Chawla retired
from the CCI on 7th
January 2016, after a 43-year
career as a civil servant from the Indian
Administrative Service Batch of 1973.
Courtesy: legallyindia.com
AZB assists Star India Pvt. Ltd. in MAA TV
(Telegu) acquisition
AZB & Partners advised and assisted Star India
Private Limited in acquisition of MAA Television
Network Limited’s business of production,
broadcasting and/or distribution of general
entertainment channels, music and movies
television channels in Telugu language.
Star India is a leading broadcaster in India with
over 40 channels in eight different languages.
Founded by P. Murali Krishnam Raju in 2001,
Maa TV has satellite telecast rights for about 700
films, a considerable number of them being
Telugu blockbusters. Star’s Shankar said the
company would like to keep the senior and middle
management teams as they were.
Maa TV group was formerly owned by
industrialist Nimmagadda Prasad, Rajya Sabha
member Chiranjeevi and actor Nagarjuna.
Courtesy: livelaw.in
6 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Around The Globe
Poland passes controversial law to weaken
top Court
In a move that undermines the democracy of
Poland, the ruling Conservative Party has
passed a law that will effectively paralyze the
Apex Court of the country and will prove a
substantial obstacle to the system of checks and
balances on the government.
Poland’s Constitutional Court, which functions
to check on the constitutional validity of
challenged law, will now face hurdles. The
approval of the new law entails raising the bar
for constitutional court rulings from a simple
majority to a two-thirds majority. The new law
hinders the proper functioning of the legal
system and undermines the court’s
independence. The law faces criticism from the
Polish Supreme Court, the Parliamentary
Assembly of the Council of Europe, Amnesty
International and former Polish President Ms.
Lech Walesa.
Courtesy: www.theguardian.com
Spain court declares Catalonia independence
plan unconstitutional
Following the economic crisis in Spain post
2008, The Catalonians want to secede from
Spain. They only account for sixteen percent of
the population but that sector is enormously
wealthy; contributing to 20 percent of the GDP.
The Catalonians believe that the rest of Spain is
an economic burden on them.
However, with the ruling of the court, someone
has thrown a spanner in the works. The Spanish
Constitutional Court has declared that the
decision to start a secession process is
unconstitutional as it infringes certain
provisions of the Constitution.
“The principle of democracy cannot be
considered to be separate from the
unconditional primacy of the constitution,” the
court said in its decision, noting that the motion
violated five articles of the constitution as well
as two articles from Catalonia’s statute.
Being one of the fastest decision’s in the
Court’s history (coming only three weeks after
the government had filed the appeal), the media
has branded it a political lever to be sidelined
before the oncoming general elections of Spain.
The acting Catalan government is not worried
and said that this ruling would have minimal
effect in obstructing the political will of the
regional parliament.
Courtesy: www.jurist.org
Bulgaria lawmakers approve constitutional
amendments to reform judiciary.
Bulgaria is believed to be one of the most
corrupt countries in the European Union and has
made scant progress in jailing its crime bosses
and corrupt senior government officials. The
National Assembly of the Republic of Bulgaria
approved amendments to the Constitution to
reform the judicial system. The changes were
approved on a first reading and will have to be
voted again.
The proposed changes include reducing the term
of the Supreme Judiciary Council (SJC) by one
year. This body will also be divided into
separate bodies – a thirteen member college
overseeing judges and a twelve member college
overseeing prosecutors. It also nullifies secret
voting by magistrates, thus paving the road for
direct election. It also increases the power of the
judicial inspectorate.
Courtesy: www.reuters.com
7 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Opportunities
NUALS’ International Seminar on Legal and
Economic Analysis of Goods and Service Tax
[April 5, Kochi]
Submit by March 17
Centre for Consumer Protection Law and Policy
(CCPLaP), Centre for Law and Economics (CLE)
& Centre for Parliamentary Studies and Law
Reforms (CPSLR) and The National University of
Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS), Kochi has
invited papers for international seminar on “Legal
and Economic Analysis of Goods and Service
Tax” on 5th
April, 2016.
For any further query, feel free to contact:
GNLU-GUJCOST and Centre for IPR Essay
Competition 2016:
Submit by May 15
GNLU-GUJCOST, in association with GNLU
Centre for IPR, is conducting an essay
competition on contemporary and emerging issues
in the field of intellectual property rights.
The theme for the competition is: Digital Divide-
Culture Re-imagined.
For further details or queries, contact:
Dr. Nidhi Buch, Faculty Convener and Director,
GNLU Centre for IPR; Email: [email protected]
Mr. Hardik Parikh, Faculty Member, GNLU
Centre for IPR; Email: [email protected]
Ms. Tania Sebastian, Faculty Member, GNLU
Centre for IPR; Email: [email protected]
BPSMV’s National Seminar on Re-envisioning
Social Justice in the Era of Globalization
[March 26, Haryana]
Submit by March 23
Papers for National Seminar on Re-envisioning
Social Justice in the Era of Globalization Research
are invited from scholars, researchers,
academicians, social workers and students on the
theme of the seminar.
For Further Details or Queries, Contact:
Dr. Kritika : 9812589760
Ms. Alka Bharti : 9671647922
Dept. of Laws: 01263283723
Udgam Vigyati, Indore Institute of Law’s Law
& Management Journal:
Submit by May 15
Indore Institute of Law finds immense pride in
inviting you to contribute from your deep array of
wisdom & learning to our Law & Management
Journal “UdgamVigyati” – The Origin of
Knowledge, bearing ISSN 2455 – 2488.
It is a peer reviewed, multi-disciplinary journal
aiming to communicate high quality original
research work, reviews, short communications
and case report that contribute significantly to
further the knowledge related to the field of
Law and Management.
For any further query, feel free to contact:
8 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Know Your Faculty
Mr. Amit Sinha (AS) has been associated with CoLS, UPES for a short but valuable time as an
Assistant Professor and specializes in International Investment Law and International Commercial
Arbitration.
Summing up his experiences so far, he gave Team CoLS Newsletter (TCN) some insights-
TCN: Hello sir, please, tell us something about yourself. What do you think are your strengths and
weaknesses?
AS: I have graduated in Law from Hidayatullah National Law University, Raipur in the year 2012. I did
my post-graduation in Law from South Asian University, New Delhi with specializations in International
Legal studies. Thereafter, I started working in Vidhik Law Partners, a law firm based in Delhi. Currently I
am working here at College of Legal Studies, UPES. I believe that my motivation to learn and to persevere
for the same is my forte. However I feel that at times I am not able to give enough time to myself and my
hobbies, but yes I do try to get time for the same.
TCN: What has motivated you towards the academic profession? From where did you get your
inspiration?
AS: My father has always been a source of inspiration for me to pursue law as a career. All professions have
their own merits and very often it is a matter of one’s own choice. I decided to go for academic profession
for the simple reason that it offered me a platform to indulge in research activities and contribute and work
more in my field of specialization i.e. International Investment Law and International Commercial
Arbitration. Apart from this, I think academics in general and legal academics in particular are a very
progressive and noble profession. If a person has an interest in a particular subject then academics provides
him a wonderful opportunity to discover and research that particular subject.
TCN: What techniques do you think professors should apply to make lectures interesting?
AS: I think the whole idea is to connect with the class and make the students understand the concept and
so the aim shall always be to maximize the participation of the students. That is why I prefer the discussion
mode of learning to make the lectures interesting. I keep on innovating methods to make the lectures
interesting by conducting certain quizzes on the subject, presentations, group work, encouraging the students
to write research papers etc.
TCN: It's been a while since you have been in UPES. What are the things you like or dislike about the
college?
AS: Professionalism in UPES is its biggest plus point. It makes the working and academic environment
sound and efficient. Apart from this, it provides us with world class infrastructure and other basic facilities
suiting the needs of an academic institution. It also provides a sound platform not only for students but also
to the faculty members to indulge in research activities and explore their field of expertise with more vigour.
With this, I would suggest there must be a ‘Faculty Rejuvenation Center’ in every college; where faculty
members can also indulge in sporting and extra-curricular activities.
TCN: Beyond the professional life, what do you indulge in as a hobby?
AS: I have profound liking for the game of chess. Travelling, cooking and listening to music are my
hobbies. I also love to spend time with my friends and family.
9 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Know Your Alumnus
Ms. Janani Srinivasan (JS) is from the Second batch of Integrated B.A.,
LL.B. (Energy Laws) (2008-2013) of CoLS. She is currently a research
associate with Kay Bailey Hutchison Energy Center (KBHEC) and Vinson &
Elkins, LLP, Houston, Texas, USA. Team CoLS Newsletter (TCN) managed
to get a few insights from her.
TCN: How did your experience at UPES help you shape your career?
JS: The best experience I cherish from my UPES days is the friendships I forged. When you are in
college you don’t realize that the people whom you shared half a century with in a small town like
Bidholi would end up being your big ticket to a great professional network. Today my friends are district
judges, academicians, associates at top law firms, and when I need career advice, or help on a case brief
that is new to me, it is this group that I tend to rely on. Practicing oil and gas transactions in Texas now, I
often find myself relating back to my classroom lessons in oil & gas and mining laws. Until date I still
use references from my Sectoral Report, to understand the energy scenario in India then. When I joined
law school in 2008, UPES was the only university offering a sector-specific LL.B program with special
emphasis on Energy Laws. Today I understand the value of this curriculum.
TCN: What would you look for if you were to hire graduates from UPES?
JS: I would look for “Attitude” than a graduate’s skill set. I believe skills can be taught and grades can
be improved. Whereas an attitude towards one’s job is largely self-motivated. A person with a positive
attitude and perseverance to learn is a great addition to any team. I was not a 3 pointer… I survived!
TCN: You are truly an inspiration for many UPESites. What/who was your inspiration to help
you make the cut?
JS: I don’t attribute my inspiration to one person or one thing. It was a combination of various elements.
UPES professors, my friends, family, everybody inspired me to push past my limits. Not to sound too
selfish, it was largely my own self-expectations that helped me identify my career path.
TCN: What extracurricular activity, according to you, can be most broadening a learning
experience?
JS: Any activity outside the academic box is important. Interestingly in my experience my hobbies have
actually helped me focus better at work and taught me patience. According to me Moot courts, debates,
journal writings, internships are not extra-curricular, rather extremely important co-curricular activities
that help you developed a rounded understanding of the nature of your work.
TCN: What are your views on the changing dynamics of teaching/learning across law schools in
India?
JS: I think we are at the corner of a positive change. I come across many law graduates opting a career in
academia, compared to other traditional means of practice like litigation or law firms, which is great. We
are moving away from passive learning techniques to more interdisciplinary approaches, which I feel is
especially important in law practice.
10 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Students’ Achievements
Paper presentation at India Habitat Centre, New Delhi
Anuveeta Datta Chowdhury B.Com., LL.B. (Hons.), Year II and Akash, B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), Year V,
presented a paper titled “Reformed Indian Policies: Dawn for the Nation” in International Seminar of
DSPSR, 2016 and 2nd
Annual Conference of IAMD. The theme of the paper was “Make in India: The
Road Ahead” and the conference was held at India Habitat Centre, New Delhi on January 3 & 4, 2016.
Their paper has also been accepted for publication.
Internship Experience in Russia
Simarpreet Wadhwa and Surbhi Khandelwal, B.A., LL.B. (Hons.), Year I, went to Russia for internship
through AIESEC and have shared their experience:
“There are some experiences that leave a long lasting impact on our lives. This
internship was definitely one of them. The opportunity of sharing our thoughts with people of
entirely different origin and background about India’s culture, prevalent laws, values etc. was
simply amazing and a unique experience.
We went there for a month through 'AIESEC'. Our project themes included 'Education’
and ‘Explore Russia'. On a lighter note, the quintessential European architecture left us
fascinated! Exploring the city is something we terribly miss. We went there at the pivotal time
of celebration i.e. the New Year, and the magnificent fireworks were something to die for!”
Placement News
We heartily congratulate our Final Year students for successfully securing placements at the following
reputed organizations and law firms:
Merritz Law Firm, Dubai: Aditya Trehan, B.A., LL.B. (Hons.)
Apex Attorney International Trade law LLP: Diksha Tomar, B.A., LL.B. (Hons.)
DNS Management Consultancy: Love Khari, B.A., LL.B. (Hons.)
NKG Advocates: Parijat Singh, B.A., LL.B. (Hons.)
SR Law Associates: Amol Chitravanshi, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons.)
Everest Cables: Anuja Keshava, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons.)
DJS Legal: Atisha Singh, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons.)
VJ Advocates: Shimona Singh Kulhara, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons.)
DJS Legal: Urvashi Shahi, B.B.A., LL.B. (Hons.)
Advocate, K.M. Pande, Gujarat High Court: Vatsal Jagdi Somani, B.B.A., LL.B.(Hons.)
We wish all of them best of luck for their future!
11 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Campus News
SURANA AND SURANA “ENERVIONS” INTERNATIONAL ESSAY WRITING COMPETITION
2015
College of Legal Studies, University of Petroleum and Energy organized its first International Essay Writing
Competition, “ENERVIONS” in collaboration with Surana and Surana International Attorneys, under the
mentorship and effective guidance of the Dr. Tabrez Ahmad, Faculty Convener, Dr. Sujata Bali and Faculty
Co-convener, Ms. Charu Srivastava. Presently, the sphere of law has been continuously evolving in the field
of energy and environment. The theme of the competition was based on “Convergence of energy and
environment sectors: Legal perspectives”. The topics of the competition were quite challenging but the
competition received 52 entries from students across the world. The theme of the competition mainly
featured the following dominant topics:
Hydraulic Fracturing in the Exploitation of Unconventional Gas: Scope for the Protection of
Environment in the Pertinent Legal Framework.
Petroleum Operations in the Arctic Region: A Regulatory Approach to the Protection of
Environment.
Environmental Disasters and Accountability of Oil Companies: Lessons to Be Learned from BP Oil
Spills.
Fukushima Incident: Revisiting Human and Environmental Safety.
The worth of the competition was further enhanced by the jury consisting of eminent professors, researchers
and academicians namely, Professor Arnaldo Sobrinho, University of Paraiba, Brazil, Dr. Kamrul Hossain,
Senior Research Scientist, Artic Centre, Rovanieme, Finland who were two remarkable personalities from
international universities, Dr. MD. Zafar Mahfooz Nomani, Faculty of Law, AMU, Prof. M K Ramesh,
Professor of Law, National Law School of India University, Bangalore, Mr. Apoorva Misra, Partner, Jyoti
Sagar Associates, New Delhi, Mr. Avdhash Kaushal, Chairman, RLEK, Mr. Anshuman Sharma, General
Counsel & Director - Public Policy, Cairn India Limited; Mr. Mohammed Naseem, Chairman & Managing
Partner, Global Law of Liaison Services and Mr. Rohit Rajagopal, Counsel, BG Group were other eminent
personalities to be a part of distinguished jury.
The Advisory Committee of the Competition was constituted by our Director, Professor (Dr). Tabrez
Ahmad, CoLS, UPES, Dr. S. Ravichandran, Advocate & Head, Academic Initiatives, Surana &Surana
International Attorneys, Chennai, Mr. Sampath Kumar (Industry Fellow) CoLS, UPES and Dr. Azim B.
Pathan, Faculty, CoLS, UPES.
The first prize of INR 25,000 was bagged by Puneet Rathsharma and Kartik JP, West Bengal National
University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata; the Second prize of INR 20,000 was won by Geetashree S. Kurup
and Jagdish Jena, National Law University, Assam and the third prize was of INR 10,000 won by Dhruv
Tiwari and Anand Swaroop Das, National Law University, Odisha. To boost the morale of participants and
to appreciate their hard work there were 12 consolation prizes of INR 1000 each.
We take immense pleasure in congratulating all the winners and participants of International Surana and
Surana Essay Writing Competition, 2015.
12 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Faculty Achievements
Dr. Saroj Bohra
Awarded Certificate of Appreciation for Exemplary work in area of excellent coordination &
successful organizing of National Seminar (21st to 22
nd November, 2015) on December 15, 2015 at
Communication meet at UPES.
Dr. Mamta Rana
Published a paper titled “Examining the Interface between Intellectual Property Rights and Plant
Genetic Resources”, in Journal of Legal Studies, Issue July 1, 2015, Vol. 3, ISSN 2321-1059.
Dr. Sujata Bali
Presented a paper entitled “Cyber Crimes against Women: Looking from Victims’ Perspective” at
The International Conference on Victim Compensation and Restorative Justice and National Bill
Drafting Competition On Victim Compensation, 2015, organized by Centre for Advanced Studies in
Human Rights (CASIHR), Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab in collaboration with
Institute of Correctional Administration, Chandigarh through web-conferencing on November 23,
2015.
Dr. Sandhya Kumari
Awarded Ph.D. on the topic of “Migration and Human Trafficking in Children for Labour Purposes:
A Case Study of Jharkhand”, an empirical study under the revered guidance of Professor S. C. Raina
from Faculty of Law, Delhi University, Delhi on 20th
November, 2015.
Delivered a lecture as resource person on “Indian Laws and Court Rulings related to Human
Trafficking” at LNJN National Institute of Criminology and Forensic Science, Delhi in a three-day
Workshop on “Forensic Evidence in Human Trafficking” on December 22, 2015.
Mr. Aravindan Anandan
Presented a paper on 'RTI as a tool for enforcing women's social security' at 'International
Conference on Gender Equality' conducted by The Gender Park, Dept. of Social Justice (Govt. of
Kerala) and UN Women conducted from November 12 to 14, 2015 at Kovalam, Kerala.
Ms. Pooja Gautam
Presented a paper on ‘Technological advancement of criminal justice system’ in two days national
seminar on ‘Criminology, crime and the criminal justice system: an insight in the contemporary age
of science and technology’, conducted from November 21 to 22, 2015 organized by CoLS, UPES.
Ms. Charu Srivastava
Presented a paper on the title “Access to Medicine in India: A Crisis or Miracle” in the National
Seminar on the Evolving Regime of Intellectual Property Protection which was co organized by
Jawaharlal Nehru University, Public Health Foundation of India and Third World Network under the
umbrella of Health Economics Association of India (HEAI) conducted from November 2 to 4, 2015.
13 Volume II, Issue XII - Volume III, Issue I
Glimpses of Literary Events during Law Week Celebrations
Nov. 23-26, 2015