Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

37
Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring Dermot Burke The General Infirmary at Leeds

description

Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring. Dermot Burke The General Infirmary at Leeds. Birmingham 37 70 Derby County 38 70 Sunderland 38 67 Preston 37 65 Wolves 38 65 West Bromwich 37 63 Cardiff 38 63 Southampton 38 60 Stoke City 38 58 Colchester 38 53 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Page 1: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Dermot Burke

The General Infirmary at Leeds

Page 2: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 3: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 4: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 5: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 6: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 8: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 9: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Commissioned analysis of surgical performance by using routine data: lessons from Bristol inquiry.

Spiegelhalter DJ, Aylin P, Best NG, Evans SJW, Murray GD.

J R Statist Soc (Ser A) 2002;165:1-31

Colorectal SurgeryWhy Score?

Page 10: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

http://heartsurgery.healthcarecommission.org.uk

Page 11: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 12: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

ASA1 Fit and well

2 Mild systemic disease

3 Severe, limiting systemic disease

4 Incapacitating systemic disease

5 Moribund

Page 13: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 14: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

APACHE

APACHE (1981) 34 physiological variables

APACHE II (1985) 12 physiological variables age and chronic health history.

APACHE III (2001) 17 physiologic variablesage and chronic health historyprior treatment location & diagnosis

Page 15: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

APACHE IITemperature - core

Mean arterial pressure

Heart rate

Respiratory rate

Oxygenation

FIO2

Arterial pH

Serum sodium

Serum potassium

Serum creatinine

Haematocrit

White blood cell count

Page 16: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

APACHE II

Developed for use in intensive care setting

Takes no account of surgical insult

Page 17: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

What is POSSUM?

Page 18: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Alien invasion: How the possum became public enemy No 1

Page 19: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

What is POSSUM?

Physiological and Operative Severity

Score for the enUmeration of

Morbidity and Mortality

Page 20: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

What is POSSUM?

A method of operative risk prediction

that allows for case-mix

Page 21: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

What is POSSUM?

18 variables

12 physiological 6 operative

Page 22: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Physiological Operative

Age OperationCardiac status Number of proceduresECG Blood lossRespiratory status Peritoneal contaminationBP Extent of malignancyPulse Elective / emergency GCS HbWCCUreaSodiumPotassium

Page 23: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

POSSUM mathsEach factor divided into 1, 2, 3, or 4 levels

weighting of 1, 2, 4 or 8 applied to that level

Amount (ml)

<100

101- 500

501 – 1000

>1000

Weighting

1

2

4

8

Level

1

2

3

4

e.g. blood loss

Page 24: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Original POSSUM equations

MorbidityIn [R/(1-R)] = -5.91 + (0.16*phys score) + ( 0.19*op sev score)

MortalityIn [R/(1-R)] = -7.04 + (0.13*phys score) + ( 0.16*op sev score)

Minimum risk of mortality = 0.40%

Page 25: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

P-POSSUM

Minimum risk of mortality = 0.22%

In [R/(1-R)] = -9.06 + (0.169*phys score) + (0.155*op sev score)

Page 26: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

CR-POSSUMAge, Cardiac status, BP, Pulse, Hb, Urea

Operation, Peritoneal contamination,Extent of malignancy, Emergency / Elective

Physiological (6):

Operative (4):

Tekkis et al Br J Surg 2004, 91: 1174-1182

ln[R/(1 − R)] = −9 ・ 167 + (0 ・ 338*phys score) + (0 ・ 308*op sev score)

Page 27: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

CR-POSSUM

Minimum risk of mortality = 0.27%

Overpredicts young, fit, elective

Underpredicts elderly, emergency

Tekkis et al Br J Surg 2004, 91: 1174-1182

Page 28: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Validation of CR-POSSUM

Patients(n)

P-POSSUM CR-POSSUM ActualDeaths

General 519 23 (4.4%) 19 (3.7%) 18 (3.5%)

Colorectal 793 36 (4.5%) 25 (3.2%) 28 (3.5%)

Total 1312 59 44 46

Shutt D et al, 2005, ACPGBI

Page 29: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

ACPGBI scores

Predictive score for patients with colorectal cancer(age, ASA, stage, urgency, cancer resection)

Predictive model for patients with malignantbowel obstruction (age, ASA, stage, urgency)

Page 30: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Practicalities

Page 31: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 32: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 33: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 34: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Arsenal 12 12 0 0 70 2 68 36 Everton 14 10 3 1 32 13 19 31Charlton Athletic 11 9 1 1 37 13 24 28 Leeds United 11 8 2 1 34 18 16 25Blackburn Rovers 16 7 8 1 29 29 0 22Chelsea 11 6 2 3 25 10 15 21Bristol 11 7 4 0 29 23 6 21Birmingham City 14 4 6 4 22 21 1 16Doncaster Rovers 14 4 9 1 17 35 -18 13Sunderland 17 3 13 1 12 60 -48 10Cardiff City 16 2 11 3 20 40 -20 9Fulham 15 1 14 0 9 72 -6 3

Page 35: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring

Man Utd 29 23 3 3 66 19 +47 72 Chelsea 28 19 6 3 50 19 +31 63 Liverpool 29 16 5 8 44 20 +24 53 Arsenal 27 15 7 5 50 23 +27 52 Bolton 30 14 6 10 34 34 0 48 Everton 29 11 10 8 37 26 +11 43 Reading 29 13 4 12 43 38 +5 43 Tottenham 30 12 7 11 40 43 -3 43Portsmouth 29 11 8 10 36 31 +5 41 Blackburn 30 12 5 13 35 39 -4 41 Newcastle 29 10 7 12 34 37 -3 37 Middlesborough 29 9 9 11 32 34 -2 36 Aston Villa 28 7 12 9 29 34 -5 33 Fulham 29 7 12 10 31 44 -13 33 Wigan 29 9 5 15 30 44 -14 32 Sheffield Utd 29 8 7 14 25 41 -16 31 Man City 27 8 6 13 20 33 -13 30 Charlton 29 6 6 17 26 49 -23 24 West Ham 30 5 6 19 21 50 -29 21 Watford 29 3 11 15 18 43 -25 20

Man Utd 29 23 3 3 66 19 +47 72 Chelsea 28 19 6 3 50 19 +31 63 Liverpool 29 16 5 8 44 20 +24 53 Arsenal 27 15 7 5 50 23 +27 52 Bolton 30 14 6 10 34 34 0 48 Everton 29 11 10 8 37 26 +11 43 Reading 29 13 4 12 43 38 +5 43 Tottenham 30 12 7 11 40 43 -3 43Portsmouth 29 11 8 10 36 31 +5 41 Blackburn 30 12 5 13 35 39 -4 41 Newcastle 29 10 7 12 34 37 -3 37 Middlesborough 29 9 9 11 32 34 -2 36 Aston Villa 28 7 12 9 29 34 -5 33 Fulham 29 7 12 10 31 44 -13 33 Wigan 29 9 5 15 30 44 -14 32 Sheffield Utd 29 8 7 14 25 41 -16 31 Man City 27 8 6 13 20 33 -13 30 Charlton 29 6 6 17 26 49 -23 24 West Ham 30 5 6 19 21 50 -29 21 Watford 29 3 11 15 18 43 -25 20

Page 36: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring
Page 37: Colorectal Surgery – Outcomes and Scoring