Colorectal Cancer Update for Healthcare Providers May 2013
description
Transcript of Colorectal Cancer Update for Healthcare Providers May 2013
Colorectal Cancer UpdateColorectal Cancer Update
for Healthcare Providersfor Healthcare Providers
May 2013May 2013
Maryland Department of Health and Mental HygienePrevention and Health Promotion Administration
Cigarette Restitution Fund ProgramCenter for Cancer Prevention and Control
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
2
CRC Incidence, Mortality, and CRC Incidence, Mortality, and Survival in the U.S.Survival in the U.S.
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
3
Colorectal CancerColorectal Cancer
Third most commonly diagnosed cancer in Maryland among both men and women
Second leading cause of cancer-related mortality
Incidence and mortality have been decreasing in recent years
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
4
Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality RatesColorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality Ratesby Year of Diagnosis or Death, Maryland,by Year of Diagnosis or Death, Maryland,
2002-20082002-2008
Maryland Cancer Registry (incidence rates) NCHS Compressed Mortality File in CDC WONDER (mortality rates)
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
5
Source: SEER 9 areas. SEER Source: SEER 9 areas. SEER Program, National Cancer Institute. Program, National Cancer Institute.
5-year CRC survival has improved over the past 30 years in
the U.S.
Colorectal Cancer
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
6
CRC ScreeningCRC Screening
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
7
Colorectal Cancer Screening Status of People Colorectal Cancer Screening Status of People Age 50 Years and OlderAge 50 Years and Older
Maryland Cancer Surveys and BRFSS, 2002-2010Maryland Cancer Surveys and BRFSS, 2002-2010
2317
1011
41
10
26
50
2320
59
11
67
18
7
98
66
5
22
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Up-to-date withcolonoscopy
Up-to-date withFOBT and/or
sigmoidoscopy
Tested but not up-to-date*
Never tested
Percent
2002 2004 2006 2008 2010
Maryland Cancer Survey, 2002-2008BRFSS, 2010
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
8
80% of people 50+ in 80% of people 50+ in Maryland reported having a Maryland reported having a provider provider recommend recommend endoscopy…..
of those, 88% got screened
88%
24%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Providerrecommended
No providerrecommended
Per
cen
t S
cree
ned
w
ith
En
do
sco
py
Maryland Cancer Survey, 2008
Provider Recommendation is KEY to Screening
Of the 20% who did NOT report a provider recommendation….only 24% got screened
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
9
Colorectal Cancer Screening with
colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy?
(50+ years)
Never screened withcolonoscopy orsigmoidoscopy
25%
Ever screened with colonoscopy or Sigmoidoscopy
75%
Maryland Cancer Survey, 2008
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
10
Colorectal Cancer Screening
with colonoscopy orsigmoidoscopy?
(50+ years)
Never screenedwith colonoscopy or
sigmoidoscopy25%
Ever screened with colonoscopy orSigmoidoscopy
75%
85% 85% have been to doctor have been to doctor
for “routine checkup”for “routine checkup” in past 2 yearsin past 2 years
Only 15%have NOT had checkup
Maryland Cancer Survey, 2008
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
11
Patient:Family and personal historyPast screeningSymptoms
Primary Doctor:Referral
Pathologist:Pathology report
Case Management and Communication
Colonoscopist:Risk historyMedication changesPrep instructionsPost colonoscopy instructionsColonoscopy report
FindingsRecommendations
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
12
Who needs screening?Who needs screening?
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
13
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Ag
e-s
pec
ific
rat
e p
er 1
00,0
00 p
op
ula
tio
n
Age Group
Colorectal Cancer Age-Specific Incidence Ratesby Gender, Maryland and U.S., 2004-2008
MD Male MD Female U.S. Male U.S. Female
Source: Maryland Cancer Registry
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
14
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
15
Colorectal Cancer Cases by Risk HistoryColorectal Cancer Cases by Risk History
Sporadic Sporadic (average risk) (65%–85%)(average risk) (65%–85%)
FamilyFamilyhistoryhistory(10%–30%)(10%–30%)
Hereditary nonpolyposis Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC, 2-3%)colorectal cancer (HNPCC, 2-3%)
Familial adenomatous Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) (<1%)polyposis (FAP) (<1%)
Rare syndromes Rare syndromes (<0.1%)(<0.1%)
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/genetics/colorectal/HealthProfessional
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
16
Risk of CRCRisk of CRC
Group Approx. lifetime risk of CRC
General Population 5-6%
One first degree relative (FDR) with CRC 2--3-fold increase over general population
Two FDRs with CRC 3--4-fold increase
FDR with CRC diagnosed < 50 3--4-fold increase
One second or third degree relative About 1.5-fold increase
Two second degree relatives About 2--3-fold increase
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
(ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s colitis)
7-10% have CRC after having ulcerative colitis for 20 years;
then ~1%/year
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)
~100%
~80+%
Burt RW. Gastroenterology 2000;119:837-53 Winawer S, et al. Gastroenterology 2003;124:544-560
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
17
Average Risk
Increased Risk
Colonoscopy, every 10 years orFOBT or FIT annually if refuse endoscopy orFlexible sigmoidoscopy, every 5 years with a high sensitivity fecal occult blood test* (FOBT), every 3 years
Colonoscopy(interval for repeat depends on risk, history, and prior colonoscopy results)
Maryland Screening Recommendations:Medical Advisory Committee on CRC
* Hemoccult SENSA or fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
18
Risk Category Age to Begin Screening
Average risk Age 50 years
Increased risk
Family History
Colorectal cancer or adenomatous polyp(s)* in an FDR age <60, or in 2 or more FDRs at any age
* Especially if advanced adenomas: > 1 cm; villous histology; or high grade dysplasia
Age 40 years, or 10 years before the youngest case in the immediate family, whichever is earlier
Genetic syndrome:
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal
cancer (HNPCC)
Age 10 to 12 years
Age 20 to 25 years, or 10 years before the youngest case in the immediate family
Inflammatory bowel disease Cancer risk begins to be significant 8 years after the onset of pancolitis (involvement of entire large intestine), or 12-15 years after the onset of left-sided colitis
Rex DK, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2009:104;739-750American Cancer Society, 2012 http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/ColonandRectumCancer/MoreInformation/ColonandRectumCancerEarlyDetection/colorectal-cancer-early-detection-acs-recommendations
Age to Begin Screening by Risk Category
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
19
Guidelines
Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008:
A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society,
the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on CRC, and the American College of Radiology
CA Cancer J Clin 58: 130-160 (May 2008)
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
20
Tests that Find Both Polyps and Cancer
Flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years
Colonoscopy every 10 years
Double contrast barium enema every 5 years
CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) every 5 years
Guidelines, American Cancer Society, June 2012http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/ColonandRectumCancer/MoreInformation/ColonandRectumCancerEarlyDetection/colorectal-cancer-early-detection-screening-tests-used
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
21
Tests that Primarily Find Cancer
High sensitivity FOBT every yearHemoccult SENSA or fecal immunochemical test (FIT)
Stool DNA test (unclear how often this is needed,
not currently available commercially is U.S.)
Guidelines, American Cancer Society, 2012http://www.cancer.org/cancer/colonandrectumcancer/detailedguide/colorectal-cancer-detection-recommendationsUnited States Preventive Services Task Force http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/colocancer/coloartzaub.htm#results
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
22
CRC Screening Guidelines CRC Screening Guidelines American Cancer Society, June 2012American Cancer Society, June 2012
Beginning at age 50, men and women at average risk for CRC should use one of the screening tests.
The tests that are designed to find both early cancer and polyps are preferred if these tests are available to the patient and the patient is willing to have one of these more invasive tests.
Talk to your doctor about which test is best for you.
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
23
CRC Screening under the CRC Screening under the Cigarette Restitution Fund Cigarette Restitution Fund
Program (CRFP) in Maryland Program (CRFP) in Maryland
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
24
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
25
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
26
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
27
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
28
Summary of Cigarette Restitution FundSummary of Cigarette Restitution FundColorectal Cancer Screening in MarylandColorectal Cancer Screening in Maryland
As of December 31, 2012:
23,203 23,203 People have had one or more People have had one or more screening proceduresscreening procedures
____________________________________________________________________________
8,356 FOBTs (all income levels)FOBTs (all income levels) 181 SigmoidoscopiesSigmoidoscopies21,355 ColonoscopiesColonoscopies
DHMH, CCPC, Client Database, C-CoPD, as of 2/25/2013
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
29
Summary of Cigarette Restitution FundSummary of Cigarette Restitution FundColorectal Cancer ScreeningColorectal Cancer Screening________ County, Maryland________ County, Maryland
2000-20XX:
XXXX Individuals screened for CRC Individuals screened for CRC by one or more methodby one or more method++
____________________________________________________________
XXXX FOBTs* FOBTs*XX Colonoscopies*XX Colonoscopies*____________________________________________________________
XX Cancers* Cancers* X High grade dysplasia*X High grade dysplasia* XX Adenoma(s)*XX Adenoma(s)*
DHMH, CCPC, Client Database, C-CoPD, as of xx/xx/xxxx DHMH, CCPC, Client Database, C-CoP, as of xx/xx/xxxx
Obtain numbers for y
our
jurisdiction from th
e Client
Database, C-CoPD and C-CoP
reports, o
r call L
orraine
Underwood 410-767-0791
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
30
Gender of 23,173 Screened* for CRC Gender of 23,173 Screened* for CRC Maryland, 2000-December 2012Maryland, 2000-December 2012
*Of clients with known gender screened with one or more of the following: FOBT, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, imaging
Women15,586(67%)
Men7,587(33%)
DHMH, CCPC, Client Database, C-CoPD, as of 2/26/2013
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
31
Minority Status of 23,203 New People Screened* for CRC, Minority Status of 23,203 New People Screened* for CRC, Maryland, 2000-December 2012Maryland, 2000-December 2012
*Of clients screened with one or more of the following: FOBT, flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, imaging
Non-minority or Unknown11,110 (48%)
Minority12,093 (52%)
DHMH, CCPC, Client Database, C-CoPD, as of 2/26/2013
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
32
Results* of 21,356 ColonoscopiesResults* of 21,356 Colonoscopies Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund Program Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund Program
Maryland, 2000-December 2012Maryland, 2000-December 2012
* Most “advanced” finding on colonoscopy
DHMH, CCPC, Client Database, C-CoP, as of 2/27/2013
Cancer/Suspect Cancer, 243, 1%
Adenoma High-Grade, 88, 0%
Adenomas, Other, 5,074, 24%
Other poly ps, 4,580, 22%
Other f indings, 7,771, 36%
Negativ e, 3294, 15%
Inadequate col but no f indings, 306, 1%
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
33
Recommended screening Recommended screening afterafter initial screening-- initial screening--
rescreening or surveillance rescreening or surveillance colonoscopycolonoscopy
“Recall Interval”
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
34
After first colonoscopy, then whatthen what?
Interval between colonoscopies will depend on: – findings on last colonoscopy, – risk history, and– symptoms
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
35
For the recommended recall intervals, please see:
DHMH Colorectal Cancer Minimal Elements
http://phpa.dhmh.maryland.gov/cancer/Shared%20Documents/ccpc13-24--att_CRCMinimalElements2013[1].pdf
(or http://phpa.dhmh.maryland.gov/cancer/ under Resources)
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
36
Guidelines for Recall Intervals Guidelines for Recall Intervals Following ColonoscopyFollowing Colonoscopy
Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Screening and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology, 2012;143:844–857
Rex DK, Ahnen DJ, Baron JA, Batts KP, Burke CA, et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: Review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012:109;1315-29.
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
37
Keys to the right recallKeys to the right recall
1. Colonoscopy Report
2. Pathology Report
3. Recommendation based on guidelines
4. Communication
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration [Date]
38
Standards for Colonoscopy Reports—Standards for Colonoscopy Reports—CO-RADS*CO-RADS*
Colonoscopy report should include:
Date and Time - Procedure Patient description Risk factorsASA class IndicationsConsent signed Sedation Colonoscope Bowel prep adequacy
Whether cecum reached Colonoscopy withdrawal time Findings Specimen(s) to path lab Impression Complications Pathology Recommendations Follow-up plan/Recall Other
*Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable, Lieberman et al., Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2007; 65: 757-766
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
39
Adequacy of First ColonoscopyAdequacy of First ColonoscopyAmong 16,813* First Cycle ColonoscopiesAmong 16,813* First Cycle Colonoscopies
Maryland, 2000-December 2012Maryland, 2000-December 2012
*16,813 of the 17,915 first colonoscopies had information on “adequacy” of the col in CRFP.DHMH, CCPC, Client Database, Data Download, 2/27/2013
Adequate 15,258 (91%)
Not Adequate 1,555 (9%)
(Inadequate prep OR didn't reach
cecum)
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
40
Reporting on
Colonoscopy Findings: – Number of masses, polyps, other lesions
(try to give actual or estimated number rather than “several” or “multiple”)
– Findings: for EACH mass/polyp/lesion
locationsize description tattoo biopsy(ies) taken method of each biopsywhether lesion completely removed or not
whether there was piecemeal removal whether specimens retrievedwhether saline lift usednumber of specimens sent to pathology
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
41
How will your patients be reminded How will your patients be reminded about their about their nextnext colonoscopy?colonoscopy?
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
42
Patient:Family and personal historyPast screeningSymptoms
Primary Doctor:Referral
Pathologist:Pathology report
Case Management and Communication
Colonoscopist:Risk historyMedication changesPrep instructionsPost colonoscopy instructionsColonoscopy report
FindingsRecommendations
Prevention and Health Promotion Administration May 2013
43
Acknowledgements
•Funding from the Maryland Cigarette Restitution Fund (CRF)
•Staff and partners of Local Public Health Department Programs in MD and their contracted providers
•DHMH Center for Cancer Prevention and Control (CCPC)• Database and Quality assurance• Surveillance and Evaluation Unit including
- University of Maryland at Baltimore- Ciber, Inc.
• CCPC CRF Programs Unit• Maryland Cancer Registry
•Minority Outreach Technical Assistance Partners
http://phpa.dhmh.maryland.gov
PREVENTION AND PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION HEALTH PROMOTION
ADMINISTRATIONADMINISTRATION