Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a...

62
Collusion in the Labor Market A tale of conspiracy between employers Pedro Gonzaga António Brandão Hélder Vasconcelos

Transcript of Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a...

Page 1: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Collusion in the Labor

MarketA tale of conspiracy between employers

Pedro Gonzaga

António Brandão

Hélder Vasconcelos

Page 2: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Collusion in the labor market

Wage

Employment

Demand

Supply

Collusion in the supply side of the market (workers)

Collusion in the demand side of the market (employers)

Page 3: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Collusion in the supply side of the labor

market:

Objectives:

Achieve greater wages;

Improve working

conditions (benefits,

workplace safety,

promotions, hiring and

firing rules…)

Increase the level of

employment ?

LABOR UNIONS

Page 4: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Wage

Employment

Demand

Supply

Collusion in the supply side of the labor

market…

W0

W1

L1 L0

Collective Labor Supply

IF the labor market is

competitive…

Increase in wage levels;

FALL IN

EMPLOYMENT

FALL IN SOCIAL

WELFARE in .

Page 5: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Milton Friedman’s critiqueIf unions raise wage rates in a particular occupation or

industry, they necessarily make the amount of employment

available in that occupation or industry less than it

otherwise would be—just as any higher price cuts down the

.the amount purchased. The effect is an increased number of persons seeking

other jobs, which force down wages in other occupations. Since unions have

generally strongest among groups that would have been high-paid anyway,

their effect has been to make high paid workers higher paid at the expense of

lower-paid workers. Unions have therefore not only harmed the public at

large and workers as a whole by distorting the use of labor; they have also

made the incomes of the working class more unequal by reducing the

opportunities available to the most disadvantaged workers.

Page 6: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Demand

Supply

W0

W1

L1 L0

Collective Labor Supply

Milton Friedman’s critique

Demand

Supply

W0

W1

L1L0

Augmented Labor Supply

Unionized Industry Non-Unionized IndustryL

Page 7: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Wage

Employment

Marginal Income

Labor Supply

Collusion in the supply side of the labor

market…

W0

L0

Marginal Cost

However, if firms have market

power…

Page 8: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Wage

Employment

Marginal Income

Labor Supply

Collusion in the supply side of the labor

market…

W0

L0

Marginal Cost

However, if firms have market

power…

W1

L1

Page 9: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Wage

Employment

Marginal Income

Labor Supply

Collusion in the supply side of the labor

market…

W0

L0

Marginal Cost

However, if firms have market

power…

Increase in wage levels;

INCREASE IN

EMPLOYMENT

RAISE IN SOCIAL

WELFARE in .

W1

L1

Page 10: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Is collusion in the supply side of the labor market legal?

Treaty on the Functioning of the European

Union – Article 101

1. The following shall be prohibited as

incompatible with the internal market: all

agreements between undertakings,

decisions by associations of undertakings

and concerted practices which may affect

trade between Member States and which

have as their object or effect the

prevention, restriction or distortion of

competition within the internal market.

Page 11: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Is collusion in the supply side of the labor market legal?

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the

European Union – Article 12

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of

peaceful assembly and to freedom of

association at all levels, in particular in

political, trade union and civic matters,

which implies the right of everyone to form

and to join trade unions for the protection

of his or her interests.

2. Political parties at Union level contribute

to expressing the political will of the citizens

of the Union.

Page 12: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

We cannot prevent workers from joining labor unions…

but neither should we force them to do so.

Page 13: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Bibliometry

Page 14: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Collusion in the demand side of the labor

market…

Cooperative agreements to reduce wages;

Centralized determination of employment levels;

No poaching agreements;

Working conditions settlements…

Page 15: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Oil Cartel to set the wages of managerial, professional and technical employees.

Surveys about past and current salary information;

Exchange of detailed information between firms;

Frequent meeting to discuss wage budgets.

Page 16: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Conspiracy between the hospitals in Detroit to depress the wage levels of registered nurses in the context of a national nurse shortage.

Exchange of detailed and non-public

information about remuneration

through:

Meetings;

Telephone conversations;

Surveys.

Page 17: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

No-solicitation agreements between high technology companies.

Eric, I am told that Google's new cell phone software group is relentlessly recruiting in

our iPod group. If this is indeed the truth, can you put a stop to it? Thanks, Steve.

I'm sorry to hear this; we have a policy of no recruiting of Apple employees. I will

investigate immediately! Eric.

Page 18: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

We rarely hear, it has been said, of the

combinations of masters, though frequently of

those of workmen. But whoever imagines, upon

this account, that masters rarely combine, is as

ignorant of the world as of the subject. Masters are

always and everywhere in a sort of tacit, but

constant and uniform combination, not to raise the

wages of labor above their actual price.

Page 19: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Sherman Act Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Page 20: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Economic literature

Bhaskar, V., Manning, A., & To, T. (2002). Oligopsony and MonopsonisticCompetition in Labor Markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives , 16(2),155-174.

Manning, A. (2010). Imperfect Competition in the Labour Market. CEPDiscussion Paper No 981 .

Manning, A. (2003). The Real Thin Theory: Monopsony in ModernLabour Markets. Labour Economics , 10(2), 105-132.

Oligopsonistic and monopsonisticallycompetitive labor markets

Page 21: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Economic literature

Mukherjee, A., Selvaggi, M., & Vasconcelos, L. (2012). Star Wars:Exclusive Talent and Collusive Outcomes in Labor Markets. Journal ofLaw Economics & Organization , 28(4), 754-782.

Shelkova, N. Y. (2008). Low-Wage Labor Markets and the Power ofSuggestion. Economics Working Papers , Paper 200833.

Bergès, F., & Caprice, S. (2008). Is Competition or Collusion in theProduct Market Relevant for Labour Markets? Recherches économiquesde Louvain , 74(3), 273-298. Centralized determination of employment

levels;

Collusion in the labor market

Page 22: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

“We just don't know much about tacit collusion byemployers because no-one has thought it worth-while toinvestigate in detail “

Manning

Page 23: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Economic literature

Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input.Work in Progress.

Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury and collusivebuyer practices in input markets. Boston University Law Review 76:1076-1116.

González, Aldo, and Loreto Ayala. 2012. Does input purchasecooperation foster downstream collusion? Serie de Documentos deTrabajo del Departamento de Economia de la Universidad de Chile, SDT358.

Collusion in the input market

Page 24: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Theory of Collusion in the Labor Market

by

Pedro Gonzaga

António Brandão

Hélder Vasconcelos

Page 25: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Assumptions

Industry composed by n firms;

Oligopoly in the final good market and

oligopsony in the labor market;

Downward sloping demand functions;

Upward sloping supply functions;

Production functions with one input;

Convex cost technology;

Competition by prices and wages;

Differentiated products;

Differentiated jobs posts.

Page 26: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Relation between the labor market and the

final good market…

Wages

Labor Supplies

Production Functions

Good Demands

Prices

Page 27: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Price

Output

Output

Output

Output

Labor

Wage

Labor

Demand

Production Function

Supply

Page 28: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Price

Output

Output

Output

Output

Labor

Wage

Labor

Demand

Production Function

Supply

Page 29: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Non-cooperative equilibrium

Profits in terms of price:

Profits in terms of labor:

Page 30: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Non-cooperative equilibrium

Optimal Prices:

Optimal Wages:

Page 31: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Non-cooperative equilibrium

Equations:

N final good demand functions;

N production functions;

N labor supply functions;

N best reply functions.

Equilibrium variables:

N prices;

N quantities;

N employment levels;

N wages.

Page 32: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Collusive equilibrium

Maximization problem:

Page 33: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Collusive equilibrium

Optimal Prices:

Labor Stealing Effect Business Stealing Effect

Page 34: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Price

Output

Demand

Non-cooperative vs collusive equilibrium

in the final good market

Y0

Marginal Cost

MgIncome

P0

Rivalry

Page 35: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Price

Output

Demand

Non-cooperative vs collusive equilibrium

in the final good market

Y0

Marginal Cost

MgIncome

P0

Y1

P1

Rivalry

Collusion

Page 36: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Wage

Labor

Non-cooperative vs collusive equilibrium

in the labor market

L0

Marginal Cost

MgIncome

W0

Rivalry

Labor Supply

Marginal Revenue

Page 37: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Wage

Labor

Non-cooperative vs collusive equilibrium

in the labor market

L0

Marginal Cost

MgIncome

W0

L1

W1

Rivalry

Collusion

Labor Supply

Marginal Revenue

Page 38: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Effects of collusion in the labor market…

Fall in wages;

Fall in employment levels;

Fall in quantities transacted;

Raise in prices.

↓ Worker’s Welfare

↓ Consumer’s Welfare

Labor Supplies

Production Functions

Good Demands

Page 39: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Partial collusion (in labor market A)

Labor Market A

Final Good Market

Labor Market B

↓ Wages↓ Employment

↓ Total Quantity Transacted↑ Prices

↑ Wages↑ Employment

Page 40: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Partial collusion (in labor market A)

Labor Market A

Final Good Market 1

Labor Market B

↓ Wages↓ Employment

↓ Total Quantity Transacted↑ Prices

↑ Wages↑ Employment

Labor Market C

Final Good Market 2 …

↑ Wages↑ Employment

↓ Total Quantity Transacted↑ Prices

Page 41: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Theory of Semi-Collusion in the Labor Market

by

Pedro Gonzaga

António Brandão

Hélder Vasconcelos

Page 42: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Economic literature

Brod, Andrew, and Ram Shivakumar. 1999. Advantageous semi-collusion. The Journal ofIndustrial Economics 47(2): 221-230.

d'Aspremont, Claude, and Alexis Jacquemin. 1988. Cooperative and noncooperative R&Din duopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review 78(5): 1133-1137.

Deltas, George, and Konstantinos Serfes. 2002. Semicollusion vs. full collusion: the role ofdemand uncertainty and product substitutability. Journal of Economics 77(2): 111-139.

Eckard, E. Woodrow. 1991. Competition and the cigarette TV advertising ban. EconomicInquiry 29(1): 119-133.

Lorange, Peter. 1973. Anatomy of a complex merger: a case study and analysis. Journal ofBusiness Finance 5: 32-38.

Simbanegavi, Witness. 2009. Informative advertising: competition or cooperation? Journalof Industrial Economics 57(1): 147-166.

Steen, Frode, and Lars Sørgard. 2009. Semicollusion. Foudations and Trends inMicroeconomics 5(3): 153-228.

Semi-collusion

Page 43: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

New assumption:

Industry composed by n firms;

Oligopoly in the final good market and

oligopsony in the labor market;

Downward sloping demand functions;

Upward sloping supply functions;

Production functions with two inputs

but employers can only fix the price of

one;

Convex cost technology;

Competition by prices and wages;

Differentiated products;

Differentiated jobs posts.

Page 44: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Production function with two inputs

Final Good

Specialized Workers (L1)

Non-specialized

Workers (L2)

Perfectly competitive labor market

(firms are not able to collude)

Wage exogenously fixed at .

Oligopsonistic labor market (firms can coordinate wages)

Page 45: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Production function with two inputs

The two inputs are imperfect substitutes.

Non-Specialized Labor

Specialized Labor

Isoquants of the Production Function

There is no more a deterministic relation between the price of the

final good and the price of the input

Page 46: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Price

Output

Output

Output

Non-Specialized Labor

Specialized Labor

Wage

Specialized Labor

Demand

Isoquants of the Production Function

Supply

Page 47: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

A two stage game

Second StageEmployment of Non-Specialized Workers

Prices Final Output

First Stage

Wages of Specialized Workers Employment of Specialized Workers

SEMI-COLLUSION

Firms can only collude at the first stage…

Page 48: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Equilibrium in the second stage

Firms choose prices and levels of non-specialized

workers that maximize individual profits;

Wages of specialized workers are taken as given.

Page 49: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Equilibrium in the second stage

Optimal Conditions

Page 50: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Equilibrium in the second stage

Optimal Conditions

Price

Output

Demand

Y0

Marginal Cost

MgIncome

P0

Non-specialized Labor

Specialized Labor

Isoquants

L10

Y0

L20

Page 51: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Non-cooperative equilibrium in the first

stage Firms choose wages of specialized workers that

maximize individual profits;

Firms predict how wages will affect their own

behavior in the second stage.

Page 52: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Optimal Condition

Non-cooperative equilibrium in the first

stage

DYNAMIC EFFECT

Page 53: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

DYNAMIC EFFECT

TYPE A INDUSTRIES TYPE B INDUSTRIES

Final Goods close substitutes differentiated

Job Posts differentiated close substitutes

<0 >0

Dynamic Effect price war effectshooting-the-moon

strategy

Price War Effect

Firms set lower wages to avoid triggering price wars in the second

stage;

Shooting-the-Moon Strategy

Firms set higher wages to reduce the productive capacity of the

rivals, forcing them to raise prices and obtaining additional

costumers.

Page 54: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Collusive equilibrium in the first stage

Firms choose wages of specialized workers that

maximize joint profits;

Firms predict how wages will affect their

behavior in the second stage.

Page 55: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Optimal Condition

Collusive equilibrium in the first stage

Page 56: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Non-cooperative vs collusive equilibrium

in the first stage

Business stealing effect

Specialized labor force

stealing effect

Dynamic effect

Page 57: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Non-cooperative vs collusive equilibrium

in the first stageAgain lower employment and

wages of specialized workers

under collusion.Wage

Specialized LaborL10

Marginal Cost

MgIncome

W0

L11

W1

Rivalry

Collusion

Labor Supply

Marginal Revenue

Page 58: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Impact of collusion in the labor market on

prices and output

Again lower output and higher

prices under collusion.

Price

Output

Demand

Y0

Marginal Cost

MgIncome

P0

Y1

P1

Rivalry

Collusion

Page 59: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Impact of collusion in the labor market on the

employment of non-specialized labor

Specialized LaborL10

Y0

L20

Non-spec. Labor

Specialized LaborL10

Y0

L20

L11

L21

Y1

L11

L21

Substitution Effect > Scale Effect

Higher level of non-specialized labor

Non-spec. Labor

Substitution Effect < Scale Effect

Lower level of non-specialized labor

Y1

Page 60: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Effects of semi-collusion in the labor market…

Fall in wages of specialized workers;

Fall in employment of specialized

workers;

Unknown effect on employment of

non-specialized workers;

Fall in quantities transacted;

Raise in prices.

↓ Worker’s Welfare

↓ Consumer’s Welfare

Page 61: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

Upcoming research…

Development of empirical methods to detect collusion based on the relation

between collusion in the final good market and collusion in the labor

market…

Page 62: Collusion in the Labor Market · Christin, Clémence. 2009. Collusive strategic buying of a necessary input. Work in Progress. Dowd, James M. 1996. Oligopsony power: antitrust injury

The End

Pedro Gonzaga

António Brandão

Hélder Vasconcelos