College Admissions - The Inside View

download College Admissions - The Inside View

of 35

Transcript of College Admissions - The Inside View

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    1/35

    Inside the Admission Office

    . . . What Every Family Needs to Know inan increasingly Competitive College

    Environment

    Don Betterton

    Betterton College [email protected]

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    2/35

    Types of Colleges ~(4200 total)

    In the U.S. there is a higher education opportunity for every

    level of student interest and ability. My categories:

    Category # Description

    Register &attend

    1900

    Routine enrollmentprocess

    Specialty

    schools

    300

    Admit on interest and

    talent

    Meet Basic

    Std.

    165

    0

    Admit > 75% of

    applicants

    Competitive

    250

    Admit 40% - 75% of

    applicants

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    3/35

    250

    B +/A- Avg

    Top 15-20%

    SAT 600-700

    Some Honors, AP

    Good

    Activities/Talent,Personal

    Meet Basic Standards

    (7s and below)

    Competitive(7s, 8s, 9s,10s)

    Selective

    (10s, 11s, 12s)

    Most

    Selective(13s, 14s)

    1650

    C+/B Avg

    Top 1/2 to 1/3

    SAT 450-600

    Pre-College Courses

    Some participation

    Good HS Citizen

    2000 4-yr

    25

    A/A+ Avg Top ofClass

    SAT Mid /High 700s

    All Hard Courses

    Unusually StrongActivities, Talent,

    Personal in

    combinationNo Negatives

    75

    A Avg

    Top 5-10%

    SAT 700s

    Almost all Honors/AP

    StrongActivities/Talent,

    Personal

    Betterton College Planning, LLC

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    4/35

    Competitive and Selective

    Although these colleges make up onlyabout 20% of the 4-yr schools, more than of undergrads attend one of them.

    They are the types of colleges where goodadmission planning is needed.

    They tend to be more expensive andinformation about how to pay, with orwithout aid, is important.

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    5/35

    Admission Recruiting Methods CreateUnrealistic Expectations

    It is hard to judge where a student standsbecause colleges send We Want You

    messages knowing they will only admit someof the students they encourage to apply.

    Beware ofcheerful assurances by admissionreps

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    6/35

    Why is it Harder Than When Your ParentsWent to College?

    In Econ 101 language, its because of therelationship between supply and demand.

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    7/35

    Supply and Demand

    Supply is steady. While there are many more students seeking to attend

    college, the number of openings has remained about thesame.

    Demand is growing overall. The number of high school grads has never been higher.

    Now about 3.3M

    The percent going to college is increasing.

    From 45% to nearly 2/3 since 1980s

    More international students want to study in U.S.

    Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac 2008

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    8/35

    What to Do

    When you are among a great many who want to attenda competitive college, it pays to know the selectionstandards.

    This knowledge can help in 2 ways:

    It can help you prepare, both inside and outside theclassroom, to meet those standards

    Courses, grades, standard tests

    Achievement, activities

    It can help you make a realistic college list

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    9/35

    Life Isnt Easy in Admissions

    While admission offices strive togenerate more applications, it doescreate a problem.

    There are more and more students toevaluate, and it is increasingly hard

    to choose among them.

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    10/35

    Consider:

    There is academic Bunching

    Increased enrollment in hard courses Honors, AP, International Baccalaureate

    College courses in high school, summerenrichment

    Distinctions are blurred Grade inflation

    Multiple valedictorians SAT re-centering, take the highest score,

    subject tests, ACT strategy Test prep courses (ePrep recommended)

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    11/35

    And

    There is personal Polishing

    Students are more savvy about building a resumewith activities and accomplishments, strategizing

    the essay, using summer for extra college prep

    High schools feel the pressure -- reluctant to lessenstudent chances inflation in teacher and

    counselor recs

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    12/35

    To Complicate Matters Further ..

    College admission offices have a split personality They are a meritocracy

    Admit the best

    They also practice institutional engineering

    Admit to meet other objectives

    The result is not one, but two admissions processes

    One for Untagged applicants

    One for Tagged applicants

    This is where confusion increases and predictability decreases.

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    13/35

    What To Do The most common reason a good student does not get

    admitted to a competitive college is that he is in theUntaggedcategory and doesnt realize the admissionstandards for him are well above the published averages.

    In fact, there may not be that many average admits. A public university publishes: 1300 SAT, 3.6 GPA

    (1400, 3.9 out-of-state; 1000, 3.2 in-state)

    In making college list and estimating chances, important toknow if you are Untaggedor Tagged.

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    14/35

    Special Categories

    The 4 most common Tagged categories are:

    Recruited athlete (+25-30%)

    Underrepresented minority (+25-30%)

    Legacy (+10-15%) Early Decision (+10%)

    One that is growing in popularity:

    Disadvantaged, low income, first generationcollege, overcoming obstacles

    College Board Survey ofColleges 2007

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    15/35

    Other Tagged Categories

    These tend to vary a great deal byinstitution.

    State residents

    Institutional need: arts talent, specialacademic ability

    Connections

    Demonstrated interest Misc: geographic, gender, full pay

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    16/35

    Level 1 Div I, II schp athlete

    Level II

    Non-schp athlete Affirmative actionminority

    Level IIA

    Low incm, disadv,obstacles Inst. Need arts,

    academic

    Level III Legacy Early Decision Connections State resident for some

    publics

    Level IV

    Geography Demonstrated interest Misc: gender, full pay

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    17/35

    Lets Do Some TaggedMath

    Mid-size private, freshman class of 1200.Spots an Untagged app may not be

    competing for:

    Minority -- 170

    Athlete -- 180

    Legacy -- 140

    Internatl -- 60Misc -- 50

    600

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    18/35

    Tagged Strategies

    Minority -- Find out if they give a preference

    Legacy -- Apply to college parents attended (check gradschool, grandparents, sibs)

    Athlete Apply to colleges where you will be a recruit

    Apply early Early Decision (Early Action) LI/Disadv/Obstacles Ask admission rep

    Instit. need Complete Arts Supplement or make contact,demonstrate ability, request support

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    19/35

    College List Making Advice

    Untagged compare yourself to the 75thpercentile of the academic profile

    Tagged-

    Minority: 25th- 50th percentile

    Recruited athlete: The coach will tell you

    what your chances are.

    Legacy and E.D.: 40th- 60th percentile

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    20/35

    An Admission Exercise

    Colleges rate applicants on academic and personalscales.

    Because colleges have to sort through so manyapps, they use a number system.

    This system is 1 (low) to 8 (high) on both academicand personal.

    Academics are weighted more heavily thenpersonal

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    21/35

    ACADEMIC RATING TABLE

    AverageGPA (UW)

    Rank Courses(5 solids)

    SAT(M+CR/2)

    ACT(Comp)

    SATSubject

    AcadAwards

    8 A+

    4.097-100

    1-2% Most

    Demanding**

    750-800 35-36

    780-800

    Intern/

    National

    7 A3.994-96

    3-5% MostDemanding

    710-740 33-34760-770

    Region/State

    6 A-3.7-3.890-93

    6-14% VeryDemanding

    680-700 32730-750 County

    5 B+3.3-3.687-89

    15-20% Demanding 650-670 29-31680-720

    School

    4 B/B-2.7-3.280-86

    25% Demanding 600-640 26-28630-670

    None

    3 C

    2.3-2.677-79

    33% Average 550-590 23-25

    590-620

    None

    2 C2.0-2.274-76

    50% BelowAverage

    470-540 19-22500-580

    None

    1 C-Below 2.0Below 74

    Below50%

    BelowAverage

    Below 470 Below 19 Below500

    None

    Betterton College Planning, LLC

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    22/35

    Personal Ratings The personal rating is based

    on a combination of attributes

    in different areas. Theytypically include:

    Achievement

    Talent

    Leadership/positions of

    responsibility

    How you are revealed in the

    application, interview, essay

    Service to others

    Overcoming obstacles

    Personal attributes

    Personal attributes primarily comefrom school and teacher reportsand required interviews. Thecategories are:

    Respect accorded by faculty

    Class participation

    Academic achievement

    Intellectual promise

    Writing quality Creativity

    Work habits

    Maturity

    Motivation

    Leadership

    Integrity

    Reaction to setbacks

    Concern for others

    Self-confidence

    Initiative

    Independence

    PERSONAL RATING TABLE Betterton College Planning LLC

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    23/35

    Non-Academic

    Achievement

    Talent OtherAchievemen

    t

    Service toOthers

    Leadership PersonalCharacteris

    tics

    8 International/

    National

    Rare in Major Rare for

    High SchoolStudent

    Extraordinary

    Contribution

    Quite

    Extraordinary

    7 Regional/State

    Unusual inMajor

    UnusuallyStrong

    Significant Rolein Important

    Service

    ExtremelyStrong

    One of Top Fewin My Career

    6 County League Quite Strong inImportant

    Important Well BeyondTypical Service

    WidelyRespected

    OutstandingTop 1-4%

    5 Major School Very Good Above Average Well MeaningService

    Very Good ExcellentTop 5-10%

    4 Minor SchoolGood Class

    Good Typical TypicalContribution

    Good Very Good

    3 Class Average Minimal Only What isRequired

    AverageGood/Average

    2 Very little/None

    Minimal/None VeryLittle/None

    Very little/None None to Speakof

    Below Average

    Non-AcademicAchievement:

    School related group activities such as government, newspaper, debate, theater,music, athletics

    Talent: Individual achievement in areas such as music, art, theater, dance, creative writing,athletics

    Other Achievement: Outside of school) such as scouting, religious, club sports, employment

    Services to Others: Volunteer work to disadvantaged, elderly, hospital, etc.

    Leadership: Positions of responsibility such as elected or appointed positions

    PERSONAL RATING TABLE Betterton College Planning, LLC

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    24/35

    8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

    8

    7

    6

    5

    4

    3

    2

    1

    COMBINED ACADEMIC/PERSONALRATING TABLES

    Academic

    Personal

    Betterton College Planning, LLC

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    25/35

    14 Super Selective Princeton, Yale

    13 Most Selective Swarthmore, Penn

    12 Most Selective/Selective Lehigh, BC

    11 Selective NYU, Carnegie Mellon

    10 Competitive TCNJ, Holy Cross

    9 Competitive BU, Dickinson

    8 Lightly Competitive Rutgers, Delaware

    7 Lightly Comp/Meet Basic Standards Quinnipiac, VA Tech

    6 Meet Basic Standards Ramapo, Drew

    STUDENT RATINGS COMPARED TO COLLEGE RATINGS

    Betterton College Planning, LLC

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    26/35

    VeryDifficult

    (10-30%)

    Difficult

    (20-40%)

    SomewhatDifficult

    (30-50%)

    GoodChoice

    (40-60%)

    SolidChance

    (50-70%)

    StrongChance

    (60-80%)

    V.G. toExcellentChance

    (70-90%)

    BC (12) NYU (11) TCNJ (10) BU (9) Rutgers(8)

    VA Tech(7)

    Ramapo(6)

    Notes:

    Betterton College Planning EVALUATOR

    Name John Rating 5/4 DateHere are your admission prospects comparing your credentials with those of

    each colleges most recent freshman man class. Green shading indicates

    Core colleges.

    Betterton College Planning, LLC

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    27/35

    Tags

    Strong Tags, e.g., Minorities and Athletes,might add 2 points to rating

    Legacy might add 1 point

    For example, a minority or athlete 5/4 (total of 9)

    would have the same admission chance as anUntagged 11.

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    28/35

    VeryDifficult

    (10-30%)

    Difficult

    (20-40%)

    SomewhatDifficult

    (30-50%)

    GoodChoice

    (40-60%)

    SolidChance

    (50-70%)

    StrongChance

    (60-80%)

    V.G. toExcellentChance

    (70-90%)

    Prin (14) Penn (13) BC (12) NYU (11) TCNJ (10) BU (9) Rutgers(8)

    VA Tech(7)

    Ramapo(6)

    Notes:

    Betterton College Planning EVALUATOR w/ TAG

    Name John Rating 5/4 ATH 11 DateHere are your admission prospects comparing your credentials with those of

    each colleges most recent freshman man class. Green shading indicates

    Core colleges.

    Betterton College Planning, LLC

    Factors That Limit the College

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    29/35

    Factors That Limit the CollegeEvaluator

    Data for freshman class two years ago

    Some missing factors like essay, interview

    Publics can have different resident, non-residentselection standards

    Within a college, some schools/majors can bemore competitive

    Admission ratings are objective for sorting groupsof students, become more subjective in individualdecisions*

    Nevertheless, the Evaluator is a good system formaking a realistic list and showing whereimprovement is needed

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    30/35

    Do the Student Ratings andCollege Matching Make Sense?

    Kerry 6+/6- 3.9 top 7% 670 SAT 3AP, 2HDance, obstacles: 4 high schools, type 1 diabetes

    UCLA (12), W/L Princeton (14), legacy

    Alex 3/3+ 2.7 top 30% 510 SAT regular coursesSwimmer, but not recruited

    UNH (6), reject Chapman (9)

    Krystle 6+/4 3.9 top 10% 520 SAT 4AP, 1HRoutine personal

    U MD (10), reject NYU (11)

    Addie 7+/6 4.0 top 3% 760 SAT 3AP, 2H

    School activities and leadership, ntl level speakerPrinceton (14) ED, legacy

    Emily 7/5+ 3.8 top 3% 750 SAT IB programSchool activities and leadership, circus performer

    Princeton (14) ED, legacy

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    31/35

    More ExamplesEric 6/5 3.7 32 ACT (1420) AP/IB 5s on 3 APs

    State ranked fencer, music, lots of service Kids Rock, EmorySchp

    Emory (12) ED

    Kevin 4+/4+ 89 630 SAT Regular coursesLeader national caliber robotics team, service to aunt with MSsupport from Penn and Lehigh faculty

    Lehigh (11) ED

    Jason 5/4 3.3 670 SAT 2AP 1H

    Some tennis and soccer, sports editor of newspaper,v.g. essay, demonstrated interest, visit, 2 interviews Syracuse Newhouse (10) ED

    Katie 6+/5+ 4.0 top 5% 680 SAT 1AP 3HSome school activities, state/national competitive dancer

    Richmond (10) ED $10,000 Richmond Scholar

    Cassidy 7/4 3.6 top 20% 750 SAT 800s SAT Subj 4APNational Chem, Math, Physics awards routine activitiesRPI (10) $8000 schp. Full schp Rutgers (8), Stevens (9)

    No: MIT, Harv, Stan, Cal Tech, Col, Rice, Cornell, PrinWait List: Wash U, Carnegie Mellon

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    32/35

    The Essay

    First rule Do No Harm10% to15% Pulls you down

    poorly written, too long, doesnt answer question

    15% to 70% Neutral

    15% Positive impression5% Big help

    Write with a conversational tone, avoid grand topics like hunger, peace, andglobal warming

    Answer the question, make it about you and something you care about. Showattractive quality, endearing flaw better than bragging

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    33/35

    Try to Avoid Speculation

    My daughter wont be admittedbecause: Too many students from her high school are applying

    No one from her high school has ever applied She didnt apply E.D.

    Only athletes and minorities get admitted there

    We applied for aid

    She didnt take all AP courses

    She got a B

    She worked in the summer rather than take a languageimmersion course in Spain

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    34/35

    How To Improve Your Chances

    Make a realistic list:

    Concentrate on CORE, other colleges on either side

    Be enthusiastic about Good Choice, Solid Chance schools

    Take good courses. Plan test taking strategy

    Add colleges where you might be Tagged

    Look at personal side. Avoid resume fillers, try todistinguish yourself.

    The 2 strong profile is appealing

    Pay attention to teacher recs, essay, evaluative interview

    Below top-level demonstrated interest can be important

  • 8/9/2019 College Admissions - The Inside View

    35/35

    Conclusion

    Plan ahead to present the best version ofwho you are, not a makeover. Look forpolish, not plastic surgery.

    Finding a college that fulfills youracademic potential and is a good fit

    personally is more important thanattending the better school.