Collapsible Soils
description
Transcript of Collapsible Soils
COLLAPSIBLE SOILS
Collapsible soils
These are unsaturated soils that can withstand
relatively large imposed stresses with small
settlement at low in situ moisture content but will
exhibit a decrease in volume and associated
settlement (which could be of large magnitude) with
no increase in applied stress if wetting occurs
Soil grains
Water bridge
Water bridgeWater bridge
Occurrence in the world
Extensive deposits occur world wide
e.g. sensitive clays of Scandinavia and eastern Canada
loess formations of China, Russia and eastern
Berea Red Sands of the southern African east coast.
Residual soils such as the Highveld granites of South Africa
Kalahari sands
The black cotton soils of Northeastern Nigeria, Cameroon
and Chad
etc
Origin
Granite Residual granite
quartz, mica flakes, kaolinite
It is characterized by quartz grains embedded in some silt materials together with fine sand and colloidal matter
Rainfall will leach out the soluble colloidal material leaving a honey comb structure
In dry environment coupled with the little salts in place the joints where the quartz grains meet some moisture will be trapped so the honey comb structure can withstand some considerable force when dry but when saturated collapses and creates a host of collapsible soil problems
Weathered
Characteristics
Have an open structure
Have a high void ratio
Have a low dry density
Have a high porosity
Are geologically young or recently altered deposit
Have a high sensitivity
Have a low inter particle bond strength
The behavior of collapse is illustrated below
Time
settlement
Normal settlement with soil partially saturated
Additional settlement with no change in applied pressure but increase in moisture content
According to Dudley (1970), and Harden et al., (1973), four factors are needed to produce collapse in a soil structure:
1. An open, partially unstable, unsaturated fabric
2. A high enough net total stress that will cause the structure to be metastable
3. A bonding or cementing agent that stabilizes the soil in the unsaturated condition
4. The addition of water to the soil which causes the bonding or cementing agent to be
reduced, and the inter-aggregate or inter-granular contacts to fail in shear, resulting in
a reduction in total volume of the soil mass.
Collapsible behavior of compacted and cohesive soils depends on the percentage of fines, the initial water content, the initial dry density and the energy and the process used in compaction.
Why do we have problems with collapsible soils?
Either one or all of the following problems may allow collapse to be evident in construction
1. Construction was carried out before collapse phenomenon was identified
2. No geotechnical assessment was carried out
3. In case the geotechnical assessment was done, it did not evaluate correctly or idenity
potential collapsible soils within the profile
4. Recommendations given by the Geotechnical engineer was ignored by the parties invoved
in the design
Evaluation and prediction
Field Identification
Observational method
Look for cracking and building distortion
Soil profiling
Recognize a loose or open fabric
Use a hand lens to look for colloidal coatings and clay bridges
Sausage test- Carve out two cylindrical sample of undisturbed material to nearly as
possible to same diameter and height. Wet and knead one sample and remould it to the
same dimensions you had. A decrease in height when compared with the undisturbed
material is indicative of collapsible material
Laboratory testing
Particle size distributionAtterberg limitsDry density
Consolidometer tests
1. Double oedometer Tests
i. Plot the e-log p graphs for both specimens.
ii. Evaluate the in situ effective pressure, Po. Draw a vertical line corresponding to
the pressure Po.
iii. From the e-log p curve of the soaked specimen, determine the pre consolidation
pressure, Pc.
iv. Determine eo, corresponding to Po from the e-log p curve of the soaked specimen.
v. Through point (Po, eo) draw a curve that is comparable to the e-log p curve
obtained from the specimen tested at natural moisture content.
vi. Determine the incremental pressure, ∆p, on the soil caused by the construction of
the foundation. Draw a vertical line corresponding to the pressure of Po + ∆p in
the e-log p curve.
vii. Now, determine es and ec.
viii. The settlement of soil without change in the natural moisture content is
S1 = ∆es/ (1 + eo) x H
Also, the settlement caused by the collapse of the soil structure isS1 = ∆ ec/ (1 + eo) x H
where H = the thickness of soil vulnerable to collapse
The single consolidometer test.
This is a simpler test to perform since
the interpretations of double oedometer test is cumbersome
Only one undisturbed sample is tested
The sample in the consolidometer is loaded to the expected stress from the structure and
then soaked
Consolidation from natural moisture content and the additional obtained from soaking is
calculated
This method is advantageous in that you can monitor the loading and moisture content paths
to which the soil will be subjected in the field.
Disadvantage this method over predicts settlement
The Collapse Potential Test
The collapse potential test is a special case of the single consolidometer test
Sample is saturated at a load of 200 kPa (Schwartz, 1985).
According to Jennings and Knight (1975) the Collapse Potential is not a design parameter,
but is an index figure providing the engineer with a guide to the collapse situation and
whether there is good reason for further investigation.
The table below gives guidance as to the severity of collapse
Triaxial testings
Stress path testing can be done which will be carried out only by training institutions and
not commercial labs
Sampling Procedures
Use representative undisturbed samples for testings
Use block samples cut by hand from a test pit or trial trench
Take samples in the field directly into consolidometer rings.
Insitu Tests
Any in situ test must be designed to compare the stress deformation curves of the soil at its natural moisture content with that of the saturated condition.
Plate loading tests have been used in many instances
Engineering Solutions
1. Precluding the triggering mechanism
Ensure that the water does not reach the collapsing soil horizons.
2. Chemical stabilization
Stabilizing agent may increase the strength of colloidal bridges. Research on this area is limited. Use of sodium silicate and injection of carbon dioxide have been suggested(Semkin et al., 1986).
3. Piled and pier foundationsStructural loads may be transferred through the collapsible soils by means of piled orpier foundations. This method is suitable for soils whose origin is transported. Then in that case the transported soil which is collapsible is shallow and underlain by stable soils or rock.
4. Design for the collapse as quantifiedincreasing structural flexibility by the provision of joints or reducing the bearing pressures to restrict collapse settlement. Raft foundations are suitable for thisMake sure there is no increase in moisture in the underlying soil with time.
5. Densification
For footings of foundations densification should be limited to 1.5 times the minimum plan dimension of footings and the soil should be compacted to sufficient density such that the CP < 1% down to the accepted depth of influence
For road works compact to 90% Mod ASSHTO for 0-0.5 m and 85% ASSHTO for 0.5-1m
This could be combined with removal and compaction
Vibroflotation
Dynamic compaction
In situ densification by surface rolling- Use impact and vibratory rollers
ReferencesExpansive soils : problem soils in South Africa - state of the art by K Schwartz
The occurrence and extent of collapse settlement in residual granite in the Stellenbosch area by NANINE GILDENHUYS
Geotechnical engineering - Principles and Practices of Soils Mechanics and Foundation Engineering