Collaborative Planning as an Effective Tool for Program Management and Sustainability … beyond...
-
Upload
tariq-fothergill -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Collaborative Planning as an Effective Tool for Program Management and Sustainability … beyond...
Collaborative Planning as an Effective Tool for Program Management and Sustainability
… beyond UASI funding …
Sandra DavisDenise Barrett
Portland UASI
Presentation Outline
Current Situation Identified Need An Urban Area Solution Realizing the Vision Let’s Talk About Your Region
The Past
Substantive UASI funding for regions to prioritize preparedness needs and make significant progress towards meeting them
The Present
Number of UASIs reduced Reduced funding for most
remaining UASIs
The Future
UASI funding will continue to decline and or be discontinued
Many preparedness needs could and may go unmet
The Challenge
How to manage and sustain your disaster preparedness program while continuing to build capacity with less resources
Finding A Solution
Developing creative ways to maximize limited resources– Effective collaborative planning
processes that build relationships and alliances which live beyond traditional UASI funding
– Cost sharing– Use of regional staff
The Portland Example
Organizations with a role in disaster preparedness– UASI – REMG– REPPG– NWHPO– WA HS Region IV– Others (e.g., Metro, Water, MARSEC,
Private Sector)
Facts/Needs Identified
UASI funding will diminish over time– Regional preparedness must
continue Ongoing & coordinated
engagement of stakeholders is key to capacity building– Contributions must be targeted
Staff support will be required for the program to be sustainable– A coordinated regional governance
framework/organization is needed
Activities
Developing preparedness vision, strategy and priorities, work plan and associated funding plan
Developing plans, procedures and agreements
Conducting training and exercises Acquiring and maintaining regional
capabilities to protect people and physical assets
RDPO Emerges
Regional AccountabilityRegional Accountability
Responsibility
Regional StrategyRegional Strategy
Regional Work PlanRegional Work Plan
Projects and InitiativesProjects and Initiatives
Input & Inform
ation Exchange
Public OfficialsPublic Officials
Directors, Executives, Administrators
Directors, Executives, Administrators
ManagersManagers
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Participants
Stak
ehol
ders
Reg
iona
l Sta
ff
Focu
sed
Adv
isor
y Pr
oces
s
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Program CommitteeProgram Committee
Steering CommitteeSteering Committee
Policy CommitteePolicy Committee
FRA
MEW
OR
KG
UID
AN
CE
STRA
TEGIC
DIR
ECTIO
N
Regional AccountabilityRegional Accountability
Responsibility
Regional StrategyRegional Strategy
Regional Work PlanRegional Work Plan
Projects and InitiativesProjects and Initiatives
Input & Inform
ation Exchange
Public OfficialsPublic Officials
Directors, Executives, Administrators
Directors, Executives, Administrators
ManagersManagers
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Participants
Stak
ehol
ders
Reg
iona
l Sta
ff
Focu
sed
Adv
isor
y Pr
oces
s
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Program CommitteeProgram Committee
Steering CommitteeSteering Committee
Policy CommitteePolicy Committee
FRA
MEW
OR
KG
UID
AN
CE
STRA
TEGIC
DIR
ECTIO
N
Responsibility
Regional StrategyRegional Strategy
Regional Work PlanRegional Work Plan
Projects and InitiativesProjects and Initiatives
Input & Inform
ation Exchange
Public OfficialsPublic Officials
Directors, Executives, Administrators
Directors, Executives, Administrators
ManagersManagers
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Participants
Stak
ehol
ders
Reg
iona
l Sta
ff
Focu
sed
Adv
isor
y Pr
oces
s
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Program CommitteeProgram Committee
Steering CommitteeSteering Committee
Policy CommitteePolicy Committee
FRA
MEW
OR
KG
UID
AN
CE
STRA
TEGIC
DIR
ECTIO
N
RDPO Primary Stakeholders
Members/partners: counties, cities, special districts, regional organizations, agencies, businesses and non-profits in the PUA--and all of the elected officials, executives, operational staff et al--who are responsible for disaster preparedness
RDPO Secondary Stakeholders
Secondary: the Public throughout the PUA
. . .and any other public or private
entity that would benefit from our improved regional disaster preparedness efforts
RDPO Mission Statement (draft)
The RDPO is a public-private collaborative partnership in the Portland Urban Area that coordinates the region's all hazards disaster preparedness efforts.
RDPO Vision—a sustainable & high-impact regional DP organization
Horizontal and vertical connectivity; increased coordination & collaboration
Engaged & empowered elected officials
Stronger multi-disciplinary, all-hazards strategic planning, training & exercising (i.e., enhanced capabilities)
Greater efficiency & effectiveness
RDPO Value & Benefits
Builds networks of support & cross-fertilization
Increases your access to regional assets & other resources (more cost-effective)
Builds capacity and capabilities in your jurisdictions, among staff at all levels and among all disciplines
Jurisdictions & Agencies:
RDPO Value & Benefits
Elected Leaders:
Helps prepare them for complex, tough decision-making
Enables them to contribute to developing much needed policies and coordination mechanisms and setting direction/priorities for an all-hazards regional approach
Increased public support
RDPO Value & Benefits
You are not alone!Widen your options!
The RDPO Model Structural Elements
Regional AccountabilityRegional Accountability
Responsibility
Regional StrategyRegional Strategy
Regional Work PlanRegional Work Plan
Projects and InitiativesProjects and Initiatives
Input & Information Exchange
Public OfficialsPublic Officials
Directors, Executives, Administrators
Directors, Executives, Administrators
ManagersManagers
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Participants
Stak
ehol
ders
Regi
onal
Sta
ff
Focu
sed
Advi
sory
Pro
cess
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Program CommitteeProgram Committee
Steering CommitteeSteering Committee
Policy CommitteePolicy Committee
FRAMEW
ORK
GUIDANCE
STRATEGIC DIRECTIO
N
Regional AccountabilityRegional Accountability
Responsibility
Regional StrategyRegional Strategy
Regional Work PlanRegional Work Plan
Projects and InitiativesProjects and Initiatives
Input & Information Exchange
Public OfficialsPublic Officials
Directors, Executives, Administrators
Directors, Executives, Administrators
ManagersManagers
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Participants
Stak
ehol
ders
Regi
onal
Sta
ff
Focu
sed
Advi
sory
Pro
cess
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Program CommitteeProgram Committee
Steering CommitteeSteering Committee
Policy CommitteePolicy Committee
FRAMEW
ORK
GUIDANCE
STRATEGIC DIRECTIO
N
Responsibility
Regional StrategyRegional Strategy
Regional Work PlanRegional Work Plan
Projects and InitiativesProjects and Initiatives
Input & Information Exchange
Public OfficialsPublic Officials
Directors, Executives, Administrators
Directors, Executives, Administrators
ManagersManagers
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Discipline and Subject Matter Experts
Participants
Stak
ehol
ders
Regi
onal
Sta
ff
Focu
sed
Advi
sory
Pro
cess
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Standing Work Groups & Task Forces
Program CommitteeProgram Committee
Steering CommitteeSteering Committee
Policy CommitteePolicy Committee
FRAMEW
ORK
GUIDANCE
STRATEGIC DIRECTIO
N
Structural Elements: purpose & composition
Policy Committee: Elected Leaders
*Unified Vision & Clear Policies*
17 members: 1 county rep. and two cities represented per county. Plus 1 rep each: City of Portland and Metro
Structural Elements: purpose & compositionSteering Committee: Directors, Executives
*Org. Development & Regional DP Strategy*
12-15 members (16 for Start-Up):
– Counties & City of Portland (6): one rep each– Law (1), Fire (1), Public Works (2), Public Health (1),
PS Comms (1), Health Care Delivery System (1)– Private Sector (1); Non-profit Sector (1)– Program Committee Chair
Structural Elements: purpose & composition
Program Committee: Chairs of Work Groups (x10) as voting members, plus a range of non-voting members
*Regional Work Plan (Projects)*
Operationalizing the Regional Strategy
Structural Elements: purpose & composition
Work Groups & Task Forces:Disciplines & Subject Matter Experts (All
jurisdictions)
*Develop and Manage Regional Projects & Initiatives*
Discipline & Capability-based Groups Represented
Law Enforcement Fire/EMS Public Works Emergency Management Citizen Corps WebEOC Regional Users Group
Public Safety Communications Public Information Officers Transit Public Health/Medical Marine & Civil Aviation Resource Management Committee
Structural Elements: purpose & compositionStaff: RDPO Administrator, UASI Regional Staff
(start-up)
*Process leadership & operational support: regional strategy, work plan,
projects, & initiatives*
(plus organizational development during start-up)
The RDPO Start-Up
Period: August 2011 – July 2013 Organizational Development:
– Stand up structure (phased approach)
– Confirm mission, vision, values, etc.– Charter & authorize the organization– Develop sustainability plan
RDPO Sustainability
Financial Support (e.g., grants, regional contributions)
Political Will
Social Cohesion
Prioritization Process
What Can You Do?
Identify existing groups of preparedness coordination
Identify regional and/or interagency activities & priorities
Develop a collaborative framework for integrating existing efforts
Implement your vision!
Thank you!
Any Questions?
Denise Barrett, RDPO Administrator 503-823-5386
Sandra Davis, Project Manager 206-478-6881