Colas Group Assessment of Environmental Complexity · Web viewAccording to the Colas Group (Colas)...
Click here to load reader
Transcript of Colas Group Assessment of Environmental Complexity · Web viewAccording to the Colas Group (Colas)...
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 1
Colas Group Assessment of Environmental Complexity
Jon McVay
University of Alaska-Fairbanks
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 2
Abstract
Colas Group appears to understand its complex and turbulent environment and strives to
maintain efficiency and effectiveness. The Group’s strengths reside in the following driving
forces: strong footholds in long-term, high potential markets; vertical integration; a network of
800 construction units and 2,000 material production units; a decentralized organization; human
capital; a technical innovation policy; recognized technical, legal, and financial expertise in
managing complex contracts; development capacities via both external and internal growth; solid
financial structure.
Keywords: road construction, infrastructure, organization design
.
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 3
Colas Group Assessment of Environmental Complexity
According to the Colas Group (Colas) website, it is involved in every aspect of
construction and maintenance for roads and for other transportation infrastructure. Roads and
infrastructure programs experienced funding declines over the past five years, which appear to be
bottoming out for recovery and improvement over the next five years (U.S. Transportation).
#1
Several elements affect Colas. These factors very in intensity and scope based on the
relative position of inquisition. This assessment is from a United States perspective and
addresses the fringe elements of the international sectors.
Industry
Despite Colas’ international reach, it competes at the local level. In this case, each location
has a similar environment with different names associated with the local. The state of Alaska, for
example, possesses a common population of small, regional, and national companies that
compete for the same work. A review of the Alaska Navigator website revealed the following
competitors: Granite Construction, Quality Asphalt Paving (QAP), HC Contractors, Exclusive
Paving, SECON, Neeser Construction, Inc., Brice Inc., Dawson Construction, Scarsella Brothers,
Knik Construction, Tutka, LLC, Hamilton Construction, and Wolverine Supply, Inc.
Granite Construction and Colaska, a subsidiary of Colas Group, manage approximately
seventy-fiver percent of the projects. These two companies are both international entities. It is
important to note that the following companies are owned by Colaska: QAP, Exclusive Paving,
and SECON. The remaining companies are small (Tutka, Wolverine), mid-sized regional (HC
Contractors, Dawson Construction, Scarsella Brothers, Brice Inc.), and large regional contractors
(Neeser, Knik).
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 4
The road construction business strives to return profits between thee percent and six
percent. However, recent upticks in competition have resulted in 3 percent representing a solid
project. Personal experience with the competitive environment in Alaska may be indicative of
the environment elsewhere. Net margins are down several points as competition is willing to
acquire work for at or less than cost. Additionally, the home range of local and regional
contractors is increasing when contracts are scarce. The penetration by outside companies, scarce
contract opportunities, and cost conscious customers yield unfavorable competitive environments
for profit.
Raw Materials
The predictability of raw material costs affects the ability to win contracts and ultimately
make money. A key component to asphalt is oil, which has been extremely volatile (Amadeo).
As contracts become increasingly awarded purely on cost, the ability to manage that volatility is
integral to short term and long term success. Oil, gravel, and Portland cement represent the
majority of raw materials that are converted to asphalt and or concrete.
In addition to those raw materials, heavy equipment, tractor trailers and dump trucks,
pickup trucks, and cranes are necessary to build the projects. It appears that equipment sales
growth is anticipated by that sector which should maintain current price indices (Hill).
Since road construction businesses are typically onsite, real estate is not a critical element
for success. That is, cheap property for temporary storage is obtained and equipment is
transported to the job site. Property distance from the job site can influence competition.
Human Resources
The mix of professional and skilled human resources varies in the industry based on a
particular model. In Alaska, the season is typical compressed into the summer months. Based on
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 5
personal experience, companies retain project managers and estimators through the winter to
compete for work. Field labor positions like superintendents, foreman, truck drivers, laborers,
and operators are typically seasonal employees. The predicted growth in the equipment operator
(Construction Operators) and laborer (Construction Laborers) occupations are anticipated to be
12% -- faster than average – in the United States (Bureau of Labor Statistics). Field labor is
most often union labor to allow for rapid expansion and contraction to support sporadic project
work.
Professional labor like engineers and project managers are integral for successful project
execution. Recruiting interns through various universities is a frequent technique to augment
fulltime employees with educated assistance while also initiating an introduction of the industry
to potential fulltime employees of the future.
Financial Resources
There are several techniques to fund organizations in this industry. Most projects must be
bonded by reputable sureties, which often forces competition for larger projects away from small
and mid-size companies. Banks are often the source for financing of small and family owned
businesses. Limits are correlated to smart algorithms and essentially tied to the company assets
and recent history of performance.
Based on personal experience, larger contractors require both a bond and a letter of credit.
These documents prove to the client that there is sufficient history and support to maintain cash-
flow through a typical construction period. In these cases, costs range from $25,000 to $100,000
per day. Payment terms are generally no sooner than 30 days and a subcontractor may wait 120
days for payment.
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 6
Market
The customers for this industry are typically Government entities (local, state, and federal).
Therefore, funding for infrastructure programs are based on taxes, royalties, and bonds. In
Alaska, almost all of these funding sources are tied to the price of oil.
Technology
The horizontal construction business maintains technological improvements in several
ways. First is the technological sophistication of heavy equipment and trucks. Telematics are
becoming more integral to vertical control and grade. Personal experience reveals that other IT-
related technologies are better quantifying utilization of equipment, down time, fuel
consumption, etc. These technologies offer potential advantage as it enters acceptance with the
contractor community.
Other technology advancements have spread beyond those economies in the west, from
improved traffic technology and solar roadways (Ashoka) to paperless site management and
drone surveys (Hesegawa). The spread of acceptance offers new customers and an eagerness to
accept efficiency innovations once resisted.
Economic Conditions
Recent improvements in the global economy, primarily moved by influence from the U.S.,
may offer additional public spending (speculation based on Brusuelas and U.S. Transportation).
Using the U.S. as a leading indicator, major transportation construction activity is forecasted to
maintain an upward trend through 2021 (U.S. Transportation).
Government
Colas employs a regional, state, and local organization structure (Colas 2017). The local
entities offer a firm understanding of the governing laws and regulations.
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 7
Sociocultural
Colas employs a regional, state, and local organization structure (Colas 2017). The local
entities maintain a strong grasp on the local sociocultural variables.
International
Colas employs a regional, state, and local organization structure (Colas 2017). With
existing international reach, it appears that it has systems in place to handle various foreign
customs, regulations, and exchange rates (Built to last).
#2
Yes, Colas is internationally diversified. The Colas workforce of approximately 55,000
employees, 800 construction units, and 2,000 material sites contribute to urban development and
recreational facilities. Colas has two operational segments: roads (civil engineering and
construction) and specialty activities (railways, road safety and signaling, pipelines and
waterproofing). The roads segment represents approximately 80% of Colas revenue (Colas).
As a worldwide construction business, Colas is challenged with balancing flexibility and
control. It employs a regional hierarchy with the following regions: Mainland France, Europe,
North America, and the rest of the world. Europe and the rest of the world are further broken out
(Colas 2017). Using Colaska as an example, the company then has sub-entities by district or
state, the sub-entities by local geography (QAP, Exclusive Paving, SECON, etc.). Each local
geography typically maintains a company-owned gravel mine, plants, etc. (Colaska).
Colas strives to invest in locations that appear to have robust infrastructure plans and
commensurate funding (Colas). Recent recession and infrastructure downturns may present
opportunity for acquisition of appropriately located companies in the active geography. Timing
the acquisition in the near term may present excellent competitive advantage in the middle to
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 8
long term given the expected economic growth of 4% in 2018 (Brusuelas). In addition,
construction spending in key geographies is expected to slow in 2018 and begin growth in 2019
(U.S. Construction).
Colas practices vertical integration. For example, a Colas company might own and produce
material for its source in the quarry, to crushing to meet contact specification, hauling, and
placement. If it owns a quarry near where significant work is planned, the control of efficiently
producing (or mining) materials from the quarry reduces or eliminates waste associated with the
potential inefficiency of purchasing the materials from another entity. Crushing the rock then
offers responsibility for meeting specifications by producing aggregate output with the least
amount of waste and the fewest number of re-runs (the need to put the same raw materials back
into the processing system). A Colas-owned fleet of trucks then hauls the material to a Colas-
owned asphalt plant. In each of these cases, increasing productivity while decreasing variability
improves efficiency of the output – a ton of asphalt placed and paved. Local growth may be
organic, but regional growth is likely to be the mergers and acquisitions.
Despite Colas’ international reach, it competes at the local level. In this case, each location
has a similar environment with different names associated with the local. The state of Alaska, for
example, possesses a common population of small, regional, and national companies that
compete for the same work. A review of the Alaska Navigator website revealed the following
competitors: Granite Construction, Quality Asphalt Paving (QAP), HC Contractors, Exclusive
Paving, SECON, Neeser Construction, Inc., Brice Inc., Dawson Construction, Scarsella Brothers,
Knik Construction, Tutka, LLC, Hamilton Construction, and Wolverine Supply, Inc.
Granite Construction and Colaska, a subsidiary of Colas Group, manage approximately
seventy-fiver percent of the projects. These two companies are both international entities. It is
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 9
important to note that the following companies are owned by Colaska: QAP, Exclusive Paving,
and SECON. The remaining companies are small (Tutka, Wolverine), mid-sized regional (HC
Contractors, Dawson Construction, Scarsella Brothers, Brice Inc.), and large regional contractors
(Neeser, Knik).
The road construction business strives to return profits between thee percent and six
percent. However, recent upticks in competition have resulted in 3 percent representing a solid
project. Personal experience with the competitive environment in Alaska may be indicative of
the environment elsewhere. Net margins are down several points as competition is willing to
acquire work for at or less than cost. Additionally, the home range of local and regional
contractors is increasing when contracts are scarce. The penetration by outside companies, scarce
contract opportunities, and cost conscious customers yield unfavorable competitive environments
for profit.
#3
As one evaluates the Colas Group from the international form, the organization is complex
and unpredictable. For example, sociocultural variation from the top, there are scores of factors
to consider. However, as one goes to the local entity and the relatively small geography,
quantifying environmental factors, predicting and influencing outcomes becomes a simpler
endeavor. For example, QAP focuses on Southcentral Alaska while SECON focuses on
Southeast Alaska, and Exclusive Paving focuses on Interior Alaska. These geographies allow for
location specific interpretation of the complexities and increase predictability.
Notwithstanding the simplification by geography, the home range of local and regional
contractors is increasing when contracts are scarce. The penetration by outside companies, scarce
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 10
contract opportunities, and cost conscious customers yield unfavorable competitive environments
for profit.
#4
The Colas Group maintains a strategy consistent with the turbulent environment (Colas
2017). It diversifies locations based on expected need and funding levels. Colas also continues
to conduct research and development to maintain industry leadership competencies. It
contributed to a paving solution not seen before for the Calgary Airport in 2015 (Croteau). It
maintains the Colas Campus for Science and Techniques where it developed Wattway, a solar
pavement panel (Press Kit, 2015). Colas Campus provides for the technical and technological
expertise under organization authority. This strength offers confidence to customers looking for
leading edge technologies and techniques within the appropriate competitive environment.
Exhibit 1 presents the environment, strategy types, and organizational goals.
Exhibit 1
Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 Type 4
Environment Calm Varied Locally stormy TurbulentStrategy Types Reactor Defender Prospector Analyzer with
InnovationOrganizational Goals
Neither Efficiency Effectiveness Efficiency and Effectiveness
#5
The Colas Group aligned appropriately across Environment, Strategy Type, and
Organizational Goals. Colas strives for improvement. This endeavor is supported by the
organization that is designed horizontally to emphasize learning and local control (Colas).
Additionally, the continued practice to collect and analyze performance in several key areas
indicates the desire for improvement. The Colas Group maintains and organization structure that
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 11
balances flexibility and learning with centralized control and efficiency. It has decentralized
organization that has strong roots in the local communities, and is able to respond to market
needs flexibly, quickly and effectively (Colas). Colas states on its website that it is a “leader in
the construction and maintenance of transport infrastructure” and that the Group’s strengths
reside in the following driving forces: strong footholds in long-term, high potential markets;
vertical integration; a network of 800 construction units and 2,000 material production units; a
decentralized organization; human capital; a technical innovation policy; recognized technical,
legal, and financial expertise in managing complex contracts; development capacities via both
external and internal growth; solid financial structure.
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 12
References
Alaska Navigator. (n.d.) http://www.alaskanavigator.org/
Amadeo, K. (n.d.). How High Will Oil Prices Rise in 2018? Retrieved February 04, 2018, from
https://www.thebalance.com/oil-price-forecast-3306219
Ashoka. (2014, May 22). 4 Innovation Trends That Could Change The Way We Design Roads
By 2020. Retrieved February 04, 2018, from
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ashoka/2014/05/22/4-innovation-trends-that-could-change-
the-way-we-design-roads-by-2020/#3cf97e3e347d
Brusuelas, J. (n.d.). 2018 global economic outlook. Retrieved February 04, 2018, from
http://rsmus.com/economics/the-real-economy/the-real-economy-volume-37/2018-global-
economic-outlook.html
Built to last, general counsel, Colas. (2011, August 8). Retrieved February 4, 2018, from
https://www.thelawyer.com/issues/8-august-2011/built-to-last-general-counsel-colas/
Colas Group. (n.d.) Retrieved January 28, 2018. https://www.colas.com/en/group/profile
Colas Group. (April 13, 2016). Annual Report 2015. Retrieved January 28, 2018, from
https://www.zonebourse.com/COLAS-5225/pdf/626175/Colas_Rapport-annuel.pdf
Colas Group. (April 11, 2017). Annual Report 2016. Retrieved February 4, 2018, from
https://www.colas.com/sites/default/files//onglets/colas_1701286_annual_report_2016_30_
03_17.pdf
Colas Rail. (n.d.). Retrieved February 04, 2018, from https://www.prospects.ac.uk/employer-
profiles/colas-rail-26816
Colas Reviews. (n.d.). Retrieved February 04, 2018, from
https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/colas-reviews-SRCH_KE0,5.htm
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 13
Colaska. (n.d.). Retrieved February 11, 2018, from http://www.colaska.com/
Construction Laborers and Helpers Summary. (n.d.). Retrieved February 04, 2018, from
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/construction-and-extraction/construction-laborers-and-
helpers.htm
Construction Equipment Operators Summary. (n.d.). Retrieved February 04, 2018, from
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/construction-and-extraction/construction-equipment-
operators.htm
Croteau, J., Pianarosa, S., HARRISON, T., Johnston, A., & Leroy-Mallol, F. (2015, November
30). A Paving Solution to Minimize Airport Down Time While Providing Resistance to
Surface Deformation: Calgary Airport. Retrieved February 04, 2018, from
https://trid.trb.org/view/1483906
Daft, R. L. (2016). Organization Theory and Design:12th. Boston, MA: CENGAGE
LEARNING, INC.
Hasegawa, Lauren. (2015, February 10). Technology Trends in Road Building. Retrieved
February 04, 2018, from https://www.slideshare.net/GoBridgit/technology-trends-in-road-
building
Hill, C. (2017, March 07). Worldwide equipment sales forecast up 7% for 2017; North America
to grow by 6%. Retrieved February 11, 2018, from
https://www.equipmentworld.com/worldwide-equipment-sales-forecast-up-7-for-2017-
north-america-to-grow-by-6/
Implementing ISO 9001 Quality Management. (n.d.). Retrieved February 04, 2018, from
https://www.bsigroup.com/en-GB/iso-9001-quality-management/Implementing-ISO-9001/
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 14
Leeds, R. (2017, December 08). Top 4 Challenges Facing The Construction Industry. Retrieved
February 11, 2018, from http://www.digitalistmag.com/future-of-work/2016/08/15/top-4-
challenges-facing-construction-industry-04388065
Marilyn M. Helms, Judy Nixon, (2010) "Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now?: A
review of academic research from the last decade", Journal of Strategy and
Management, Vol. 3 Issue: 3, pp.215-251, https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251011064837
Phillips, A. (2015, January 04). Top 10 construction companies in the world. Retrieved January
28, 2018, from http://www.constructionglobal.com/top-10/top-10-construction-companies-
world
Press Kit: Watt Way. (2015). Retrieved February 4, 2018 from
http://www.wattwaybycolas.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Wattway-DP-UK.pdf
Telematics in Heavy Equipment Market - Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth,
Trends, and Forecast 2017 - 2025. (2017, November 20). Retrieved February 11, 2018,
from https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/telematics-in-heavy-equipment-market---
global-industry-analysis-size-share-growth-trends-and-forecast-2017---2025-
300559651.html
U.S. Transportation Construction Market Forecast 2017. (n.d.). Retrieved February 4, 2018 from
https://www.artba.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/2017_ARTBA_MarketForecast_Final1
2.21.pdf
COLAS GROUP ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY 15