Coke Version4

31
Coca Cola Company Group 8: 1. Johan 2. Hazar 3. Iylia 4. Lilaj 1

description

this is case study

Transcript of Coke Version4

Page 1: Coke Version4

1

Coca Cola Company

Group 8:1. Johan2. Hazar3. Iylia4. Lilaj

Page 2: Coke Version4

2

Purpose:• Sustain company growth.• Should We Enter Snack or Food

Industry?• Strategic Direction for Coca Cola

Company.• Develop 3-Year Strategic Plan.

introduction

Page 3: Coke Version4

3

Information Generation

• Porter’s 5 Forces• PESTLE• SWOT

Analysis• BCG• TOWS• Space• Ansoff

Implement• Action Plans• Budgets• Schedules

Evaluation• Strategic

Map• BSC

Strategic process flow

Page 4: Coke Version4

4

Porter’s 5 Forces

Pestle

Pestle + porter’s 5 forcesInformation Generation

Political

Economic

Social

Technological

Legal

Environmental

Page 5: Coke Version4

5

Porter’s 5 forces

Rivalry among existing competitors - High

• Many competitors.• Financially strong

(Pepsico).• Saturating market

growth.

Bargaining Power of Suppliers – Low• Undifferentiated

input.• Coca Cola is the

largest customer for the suppliers.

Threat of Substitute Product – High

• Milk and alcoholic drinks.

Bargaining Power of Buyers – Low• Low switching cost.•Brand loyalty.•Price sensitive.•Buyer concentration.

Threat of New Entrants – Medium• No switching cost.• Brand loyalty.• Strict Regulation.

Information Generation

Page 6: Coke Version4

6

Pestle ANALYSISInformation Generation

Political factors Economic factors Social factors

• Strict manufacturing procedures.

• Country-specific political stability.

• Government’s campaign to create healthier society.

• High commodity food prices and high unemployment rate have forced Coca Cola to offer low prices to cost-conscious consumers.

• Consumers are becoming more health conscious.

• Growingly price sensitive.

Page 7: Coke Version4

7

Pestle ANALYSISInformation Generation Technological factors Environmental

factorsLegal factors

• Advance in technology improves manufacturing process.

• Coca Cola tends to use the technology to sell effectively its products (ie.greener bottles and packaging).

• All of the facilities in Coca Cola are strictly monitored according to the environmental laws imposed by the government.

• Coca Cola have made an investment to build the world's largest plastic bottle-to-bottle recycling plant and to support recycling in the U.S.

• Caramel colouring: Law known as Proposition 65, the State of California began requiring warning labels for some products containing 4-MEI above an extremely low level. Coca Cola engage caramel supplier to ensure it is below the level set by California.

Page 8: Coke Version4

8

swotStrength:S1. Market leaderS2. Strong Marketing ArmS3. Strong brand imageS4. Strong brand portfolioS5. Strong cash flow

Weakness:W1. Unhealthy brand imageW2. Poor reception in Middle East.W3. Negative publicity.W4. Solely focus on beverage industry.

Opportunity:O1. Technological advancementO2. Growing demand for healthy products.O3. Low switching costO4. Emerging market

Threat:T1. Volatile exchange rates.T2. Growingly intense competition.T3. Uncertain inflation rate.T4. Saturating beverage industry growth in U.S.

Information Generation

Page 9: Coke Version4

9

towsSO:S2,S5,O3 – Launch aggressive marketing campaign to grab bigger market share.

WO:W1,O2 – Launch more healthy brands to improve image.

ST:S3,S4,T2 – Strong brand power and diverse product line can deter competition.

S2,S3,S5,T4 – Leverage on Coca Cola strong capabilities and brand to enter newmarket.

WT:W4,T4 – Venture into new industry

Analysis

Page 10: Coke Version4

10

Where are we now?Where do we want to go?

bcgAnalysis

Page 11: Coke Version4

11

spaceFinancial Position (FP) Stability Position (SP)

Liquidity 5 Technological changes -4

Leverage 4 Price elasticity -4Cash flow 6 Barriers to entry into market -3

Profitability 6 Competitive pressure -5

Earning per share 3 Demand variability -3

Return on investment 4 Risk involved in business -3

Total 27 Total -22Average (FP) 4.67 Average (SP) -3.67

Y-Axis = FP + SP = 4.67 + (-3.67) = 1

Page 12: Coke Version4

12

spaceCompetitive Position (CP) Industry Position (IP)

Market share -2 Growth potential 5

Product quality -1 Financial stability 3Brand and image -3 Ease of entry into market 6

Product life-cycle -3 Profit potential 3

Customer loyalty -2 Resource utilization 3

Technology know-how

-4 Productivity utilization 3

Total 15 Total 22Average (FP) -2.50 Average (SP) 3.83

X-Axis = CP + IP = (-2.50) + 3.83 = 1.33

Page 13: Coke Version4

spaceAnalysis

1.00

1.33

FP

SP

CP IP

CONSERVATIVE

DEFENSIVE

AGGRESSIVE

COMPETETIVE

Page 14: Coke Version4

14

ansoffTOWS Risk Ansoff

SO: S2,O3 – Launch aggressive marketing campaign to grab bigger market share.

Low Market Penetration

ST: S2,S3,S5,T4 – Leverage on Coca Cola strong capabilities and brand to enter new market.

Moderate Market Development

WO: W1,O2 – Launch more healthy brands to improve image.

Moderate Product Development

WT: W4,T4 – Venture into new industry.

High Diversification

Analysis

Page 15: Coke Version4

15

mCkinsey 7s

Factors Issues Risk Alignment Compliance

Structure Coca Cola:Centralise

Kar’s Nut:Decentralise

Communication issues

Rotate managers

Yes, Coca Cola is committed to integrate Kar’s Nut.

Strategy Coca Cola:High advertisement expenses.

Kar’s Nut:Spend more on R&D.

Disagreement in resource allocation

Increase budget for R&D.

Yes, more resources will be utilized for the effort.

Analysis

Page 16: Coke Version4

16

Factors Issues Risk Alignment Compliance

System Coca Cola:Uses SAP system.

Kar’s Nut:Uses Pronto system.

Difficulty to centralize information between the two system.

Kar’s Nut to convert to SAP.

Yes, conversion benefits outweigh the initial cost.

Staff Coca cola :Employee enjoys a lot of benefits.

Kar’s Nut:Give little benefits for the employees.

Dissatisfied employees due to unequal treatment.

Increase benefits options to Kar’s Nut employees.

Yes, new benefit options would receive warm welcome among the employees.

AnalysismCkinsey 7S

Page 17: Coke Version4

17

Factors Issues Risk Alignment Compliance

Style Coca-colaAllow mistakes to encourage learning.

Kar’s NutsDiscourage mistakes.

Conflicting style.

Change the accepted ways of doing things for Kar’s Nut.

Yes, Coca Cola style has proven to be more effective.

Skills Coca-ColaStaff are regularly trained as new technique or technology appear.

Kart’s NutsStaff are trained once a year and some techniques are inefficient.

Skills imbalance.

Send Kar’s Nuts staff for training and development.

Yes, developing the staff would reap the company higher benefits in the future.

Page 18: Coke Version4

18

Factors Issues Risk Alignment ComplianceShared Value

Coca Cola:Encourage diversity with workforce of different races and taps into talents all over the world.

Kar’s Nut:Workforce consist mainly Americans.

Internal conflict between the employees.

Give overseas assignment to Kar’s Nut managers and training.

Yes, the objective is clear

Page 19: Coke Version4

19

Info. BCG TOWS Space Ansoff

SWOT:W4:Solely focus on beverage.T4:Saturating beverage industry.

1. Need more brands in Star quadrant.

2. Over reliance on core brand.

WT: Venture into new industry. (W4,T4)

Aggressive Strategies

Diversification to Food industry.

Porter’s 5 Forces:High intensity competition in beverage industry.

recap

Page 20: Coke Version4

20

Info. BCG TOWS Space Ansoff

SWOT: S2:Strong Marketing.S3:Strong Brand.T4:Saturating US Market. Need more

brands in Star quadrant.

ST: Leverage on Coca Cola strong capabilities and brand to enter new market.

Aggressive Strategies

Market Development to penetrate new market.

Porter’s 5 Forces:High intensity competition in beverage industry.

recap

Page 21: Coke Version4

21

Info. BCG TOWS Space Ansoff

SWOT:

W1:Unhealthy brand image.O2: growing demand for healthy products.

1. Need more brands in Star quadrant.

2. Over reliance on core brand.

WO:Launch more

healthy products

to improve image.

Aggressive Strategies

Product Development to introduce

more nutritional

brands.PESTLE: P-Government initiatives to promote healthy lifestyle.

recap

Page 22: Coke Version4

22

Learning & Growth

PerspectiveMaintain learning

cultureEnable technology Information Capital

Internal Perspective

Innovation Improve Internal Processes Customer Relationship Management

Customer Perspective

Create customer value Branding Availability Social Concern

Financial Perspective Improve profitability Increase Asset Utilisation Expand Revenue

OpportunitiesImprove Cost of

Operations

VISION: To inspire people to be the best they can be and leave positive imprint to the society.MISSION: To refresh the consumers around the world with delicious, convenient, and complementary

food and beverages that inspire moments of wisdom and happiness.

Strategic mapEvaluation

Page 23: Coke Version4

23

Balance scorecardEvaluation

Page 24: Coke Version4

24

Balance scorecardEvaluation

Strategy Goal: Objective: Measures TargetsWhat we want to accomplish How are we going to accomplish goal

Improve internal processes Effective implementation Initiatives delivered on time % of initiatives delivered on time 90%to maximise resources of initiatives. Initiatives delivered within budget % of initiatives delivered 90%and infrastructure. within budget

Initiative meets project goals % of goals met 90%

Strategy Goal: Objective: Measures TargetsWhat we want to accomplish How are we going to accomplish goal

Promote culture and 1. Increase skills and Provide training. Percent of employees attend 60%working environment knowledge. to the training.that encourages growth 2. Accomplish our goals and Communicate the project status percent of reports delivered 95%and development to meet finish projects. and barriers to decision makers. on time required.individual needs of ouremployees.

Internal Perspective

Learning & Growth Perspective

Page 25: Coke Version4

25

Balance scorecardEvaluation

Strategy Goal: Objective: Measures TargetsWhat we want to accomplish How are we going to accomplish goal

Reduce cost of operation. Streamline business process Utilise cost-benefit analysis to Percent of change initiatives 20%to reduce cost. make better decisions. that have cost benefit.

Strategy Goal: Objective: Measures TargetsWhat we want to accomplish How are we going to accomplish goal

Meet customer's needs 1. Identify change in customer Introduce new brand that fits the Feedback survey. 4.5 score of 5.and build on brand image. preference and implement new taste preference and more

solutions. nutritional content.2. Build brand image. Advertisement campaign. Conduct post-campaign Positive perception with

assessment on perception increase in sales by 10%.and response to sales.

Financial Perspective

Customer Perspective

Page 26: Coke Version4

26

Winning strategy

Fit Test:● Strategy that corresponds to industry, competition, market opportunities, and other factors that affects the business.

Competitive Advantage Test:● Achieve sustainable advantage - Well differentiated product line- Build on the brand

Performance Test:● Strategy produces good performance.- Increase revenue potential.- Sustain company’s high growth.

Evaluation

Page 27: Coke Version4

27

The End

Thank you

Page 28: Coke Version4

28

All Brands

Page 29: Coke Version4

29

Appendix

Page 30: Coke Version4

30

Appendix

Page 31: Coke Version4

31

Appendix