Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

download Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

of 11

Transcript of Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    1/111

    The co-interaction of consumption and income

    Statement of the Problem

    This paper studies the co-interaction of consumption and income. But the

    consumption expenditure is a complex matter. It depends on the income. If

    income increases in a dollar, consumption increases by a fraction of a dollar. This

    fraction is the marginal propensity to consume on the simplest ways to express

    such a relation of dependency is as a linear function:

    C=a+bY

    Where C is the consumption expenditure, Y is the national income

    and "a" and "b" is constant.

    In this paper, we will consider a relation between the consumption and the income.

    Moreover this paper will use an econometric method to estimate parameters in the

    model, apply some test to verify the result we acquire and then conclude the model.

    General model:

    C t=1+2YD t+ t

    Where:Ct(GC)= Consumption Expenditure

    YDt(GYD)= Income

    Before some testing process we have to establish random walks model because

    regressing one random walk against another can lead to spurious results in that

    conventional significance tests will tend to indicate a relationship between the two

    variables when in fact none exists. This is one reason why it is important to test for

    random walks. If a test fails to reject the hypothesis of a random walk, one can

    difference the series question before using it in regression. Since many economic

    time series seem to follow random walks, this suggests that one will typically want to

    difference a variable before using it in regression. While this is acceptable,differencing may result in a loss of information about the long- run relationship

    between two variables

    Data sources and description

    Due to time and scope, quarterly time series data from 1954.1 to 1995.21

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    2/111

    The co-interaction of consumption and income

    There are 166 observation. The data has been collected from sheet. In addition with

    this purpose the book of (i) Econometric models and Economic forecast ( by- Robert

    S. pindyck and Doniel L.), fourth edition, (ii) Basic Econometrics. Domandar N.

    Gujrati. fourth edition, have been used. . After analysis the result, I'll attach a copy

    of data.

    Descriptive statistics of each variable:

    Date:11/15/09

    Time: 12:22Sample: 1954:1 1995:2

    GC GYD

    Mean 1578.775 1726.075Median 950.4500 1071.650Maximum 4851.029 5201.000Minimum 236.4000 258.6000Std. Dev. 1388.838 1496.928Skewness 0.878114 0.838759Kurtosis 2.424395 2.350241

    Jarque-Bera 23.62498 22.38407Probability 0.000007 0.000014

    Observations

    166 166

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    3/111

    The co-interaction of consumption and income

    GYD

    Model Estimation

    For the model estimation, we will do some test about the co- integration ofconsumption and income. Now we apply the least square method for the ADF testand output is show below:

    ADF Test Statistic 9.623256

    1% CriticalValue*

    -3.4713

    5% Critical Value -2.879110% Critical Value -2.5760

    *MacKinnon critical values for rejection of hypothesis of aunit root.

    Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test EquationDependent Variable: D(GC)

    Method: Least SquaresDate: 11/15/09 Time: 13:01Sample(adjusted): 1954:3 1995:2Included observations: 164 after adjusting endpoints

    Variable Coefficient

    Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

    GC(-1) 0.014044

    0.001459 9.623256 0.0000

    D(GC(-1)) 0.02290 0.079927 0.286596 0.7748

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    4/11

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    5/111

    The co-interaction of consumption and income

    738.0990

    1

    Durbin-Watsonstat

    1.912886

    Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

    Vector Error Correction Estimates:

    Date: 11/15/09 Time: 13:16Sample(adjusted): 1954:4 1995:2Included observations: 163 afteradjusting

    endpointsStandard errors & t-statistics inparentheses

    CointegratingEq: CointEq1

    D(GC(-1)) 1.000000

    D(GYD(-1)) -0.949584(0.03716)

    (-25.5512)

    C 0.825001

    ErrorCorrection:

    D(GC,2) D(GYD,2)

    CointEq1 -0.480847 1.265850

    (0.11620) (0.12944)(-4.13802) (9.77945)

    D(GC(-1),2) -0.338085 -0.242504(0.09645) (0.10744)

    (-3.50512) (-2.25706)

    D(GYD(-1),2) -0.278621 -0.053315(0.06086) (0.06779)

    (-4.57800) (-0.78643)

    C 0.643335 0.181223

    (1.26298) (1.40686)(0.50938) (0.12881)

    R-squared 0.461454 0.710258Adj. R-squared

    0.451293 0.704791

    Sum sq.resids

    41319.57 51269.99

    S.E. equation 16.12053 17.95697

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    6/111

    The co-interaction of consumption and income

    F-statistic 45.41319 129.9214Log likelihood -682.4173 -700.0025Akaike AIC 8.422298 8.638068Schwarz SC 8.498218 8.713988Meandependent

    0.408840 0.087730

    S.D.dependent

    21.76252 33.04977

    Determinant ResidualCovariance

    72079.53

    Log Likelihood -1374.194Akaike InformationCriteria

    16.98398

    Schwarz Criteria 17.17378

    Result and conclusion

    We have tested whether real consumption spending and real income are co-

    integrated, using quarterly data from 1954:1 to 1952:2. we first test whether each

    variable is a random walk using the augmented Dickey-Fuller test. Running this test,

    first for consumption and then for the income and case include logs for the change in

    the variable, always yields test statistics that fail to reject the random walk h

    Hypothesis. Next run a co-integrated regression of consumption C against income

    from the Durbin-Watson statistics. We can see it value and comparing the critical

    value. We can reject the hypothesis at a random walk at the 5% level. Running a

    Dickey-Fuller test on the residuals of the regression also leads to a rejection of the

    random walk hypothesis at the 5% level.

    Limitation of the study and possible extension

    There is no limitation on getting the essential data and information. The data which

    are collected, I have assumed the all information true and collected. I have some

    limitation from the span of time, besides I did not get enough facility to use EVIEWs

    program for me. Notwithstanding these limitations, it is expected that it will also

    contribute in a merger to have better under standing of the condition of the single

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    7/111

    The co-interaction of consumption and income

    equation model.

    Acknowledgement

    I am grateful to our beloved professor Dr. Bangorn Tubtimtong for his

    contribution and his moral assistance.

    References.

    1.Damonder N. Gujarati , Basic Econometrics, McGraw-Hill, fourth edition.

    2. Robert S Pindyck and Daniel L Rubinfeld, Econometric model and forecast

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    8/111

    The co-interaction of consumption and income

    Appendix

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    9/111

    The co-interaction of consumption and income

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    10/111

    The co-interaction of consumption and income

  • 8/14/2019 Cointegration of Consumption and Income 3

    11/111

    The co-interaction of consumption and income