Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

20
COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF WEB SITE NAVIGATION Aimee Maree Forsstrom BAppComp Post Graduate Research Student Southern Cross University School of Information Technology Research performed under the supervision of Dr Graham Cooper

description

cognitive science, web navigation, design, technology, researc

Transcript of Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

Page 1: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

COGNITIVE ANALYSIS OF WEB SITE NAVIGATION

Aimee Maree Forsstrom BAppComp

Post Graduate Research Student

Southern Cross University

School of Information Technology

Research performed under the supervision of Dr Graham Cooper

Page 2: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

HUMAN COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURE

Image from http://education.arts.unsw.edu.au/staff/sweller/clt/

Page 3: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

PLUS OR MINUS TWO THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some

Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information *

Short-term memory is restricted to just a few bits of information, this famous paper by George A Miller showed among other things how chunking could be employed to increase the restricted capacity of short-term memory.

*originally published in The Psychological Review, 1956, vol. 63, pp. 81-97 http://www.musanim.com/miller1956/

Page 4: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY

Cognitive load refers to the total amount of mental activity imposed on working memory at an instance in time.

This theory suggests that learning happens best under conditions that are aligned with human cognitive architecture.

Sweller, J., Instructional Design in Technical Areas, (Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research (1999).

Page 5: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

THE THREE MAIN TYPES OF COGNITIVE LOAD

Intrinsic cognitive load; Cannot be changed, this is due to the inherent difficulty associated with the information presented.

Extraneous cognitive load; Unnecessary cognitive load generated by the manner in which information is presented to learners and is under the control of designers (Cooper 1998).

Germane cognitive load; devoted to the processing, construction and automation of schemata (long term memory)” (Sweller 1999).

Page 6: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

WITH COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY WE CAN REDUCE THE REQUIRED MENTAL EFFORT

When intrinsic cognitive load is low (simple content) sufficient mental resources remain

If the intrinsic cognitive load is high and the extraneous cognitive load is high total cognitive load will exceed.

Modifying instructional materials to engineer a lower level of extraneous cognitive load will facilitate learning.

Page 7: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY FOCUSES ON THE ROLE OF WORKING MEMORY IN THE LEARNING PROCESS

1. Working memory is extremely limited.2. Long term memory is essentially unlimited.3. The process of learning requires working

memory to be actively engaged in the comprehension of instructional material to encode into long term memory.

4. If the resources of working memory are exceeded then learning will be ineffective.

Page 8: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

WHY WEB SITE NAVIGATION AND CLT?

As we navigate and learn our way through a web site we are interacting with and processing information

With the uptake of the web and the use of the web for business applications Navigation becomes more important to our efficient use of the web

Page 9: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

MAIN WAY WE ACCESS INFORMATION – THE INTERNET

Web Site Navigation is Instructional Design Navigation is the instruction we use to locate

and move our way through a web site

Page 10: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

NOT JUST STATIC BUT INTERACTIVE

The web has become Interactive No longer do we just surf/browse for

information But we interact with it and perform tasks

Page 11: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

TASK DRIVEN NAVIGATION

With the rise of content management systems most websites these days are maintained by task driven interaction

Websites such as Twitter, facebook, bebo, linkedin, myspace are task driven not browse and search

We visit these websites to perform tasks and interact with the information

All this interacting changes the way we navigate around the web

Page 12: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

ALL THIS INFORMATION CAN OVERLOAD OUR MEMORY

* Image from http://my.opera.com/englishlearning/blog/shor-term-memory

Page 13: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

CAN WE ANALYSE IF PEOPLE HAVE INTERPRETED INFORMATION ON A WEB SITE?

Yes, this is where Cognitive Load Theory and Cognitive Analysis comes into play...

We don't just test if people enjoy and can use the website but we access how much information they have been able to process whilst interacting with it.

Page 14: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

HOW DO WE PROVE INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN IS BETTER

We run Controlled Experiment/s We take two groups of people One with the normal instruction (Control

Group) One with the changed instruction

(Experiment Group) We then look at the test results to see if

there is any statistical difference between the groups

If there is a statistical difference then the instructional change has benefited the interpretation of that information

Page 15: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

EXAMPLE OF COGNITIVE LOAD WEB BASED EXPERIMENT

Game was designed to mimic task driven navigation

Two groups where used with different navigation types

Navigation design change looked into was CSS position:fixed (use of static menus)

Page 16: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

EXPERIMENT DESIGN

1. Participants where taken through a navigation game (Random Facts Game)

2. Asked to complete a mental effort survey3. Asked to complete a “Fill in the Facts”

questionnaire from the random facts learnt in the game

4. Ask to perform a rebuild of the navigation menu (to show uptake of schema)

5. Asked to complete a usability survey and provide quantitative feedback

Page 17: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM EXPERIMENT

The experiment group was more efficient in time for navigation steps, statistical significance found.

From the “Fill in the Facts” questionnaire we can see a statistical difference in the overall scores out of 17 questions, the experiment group scored higher in 14 and in all the harder questions.

From the Navigation Schema rebuild we can see a statistical difference in overall schema rebuild

In qualitative analysis 47% of the control group complained about the navigation whilst only 17% complained in the experiment group

Page 18: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

WHAT DOES IT HELP US UNDERSTAND

From this research we can see a trend that if we change the web site navigation to adhere to cognitive load then people are able to take in the information more

We can form a conclusion that the group with better navigation had a lower incidence of cognitive over load and hence were able to interpret the information and also interact with more elements of the information

Some statistical differences found and trends present which present the need for further research into this effect

Page 19: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

WHY IS COGNITIVE ANALYSIS NEEDED

Task Driven Navigation not just seek and find Web as become a hub of activity where we work

not just play More business is being done online, more people

are forced to interact with websites for there work Stop the guess work, are people taking in and

interacting with the information on our web sites

Examples of sites that could use Cognitive Analysis Government portal sites where access to worthwhile

information is why people visit them Content Management Systems (example Drupal

Admin Menu) Task driven and business based web applications

Page 20: Cognitive analysis of web site navigation

NOW THAT WE HAVE PASSED THE “WOW” FACTOR OF THE WEB, IT IS THE TIME FOR US AS WEB ENGINEERS TO ENSURE THAT THE USER EXPERIENCE IS PARAMOUNT.

NO LONGER CAN WE JUST DESIGN WEB SITES FOR US OR FOR THE BUSINESS BUT WE NEED TO CONSIDER HOW PEOPLE ARE INTERACTING WITH AND INTERPRETING OUR INFORMATION.

AIMEE MAREE FORSSTROM 2009