Cognition

21
Cognition

description

Cognition. Social Learning Mechanisms. Social Learning Mechanisms. Mechanisms Stimulus or Social Enhancement (instrumental) Drawn to object by conspecific could learn via trial and error Observational Fear Conditioning (classical) UR caused by a conspecific - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Cognition

Page 1: Cognition

Cognition

Page 2: Cognition

Social Learning Mechanisms

Page 3: Cognition

Social Learning Mechanisms Mechanisms

Stimulus or Social Enhancement (instrumental) Drawn to object by conspecific could learn via trial and error

Observational Fear Conditioning (classical) UR caused by a conspecific

Mimicry (“Monkey See-Monkey Do”) Copy for copying sake

Imitation (copy to get goal) Copy exactly to get the same goal as the

demonstrator Self vs. Other Perspective (“Theory of mind”)

Page 4: Cognition

Food Preferences and Enhancement

Rats prefer foods eaten by conspecifics not simply, smell of food associated with smell

of the model rat rear end vs. front end matters asleep vs. awake doesn’t social (rat) vs nonsocial (cotton ball) matters

Page 7: Cognition

Mimicry, Imitation, Emulation

Mimicry Not intentional

Imitation Imitation, slavish copying with a goal Emulation, non-slavish copying with a goal

(could be “copying of goal” + “trial and error”, or problem solving)

Page 8: Cognition

Emulation vs. Imitation

Push Pull

Ghost

Model

Movement

Page 9: Cognition

Results of Tomesello (2006)

Page 10: Cognition

Children

Page 11: Cognition

Theory of Mind

• Understanding that others have mental processes that may differ from one’s own

EmotionsKnowledgeVisual Perspective

Page 12: Cognition
Page 13: Cognition

Knowledge AttributionPovinelli (1991)

Knower – sees food being hidden Guesser – outside of room

Stage 1: As aboveStage 2: Knower wears hatStage 3: Guesser stays in room with a

bagged head

Page 14: Cognition

Chimpanzees(Great Apes)

Rhesus Monkeys(New World)

Page 15: Cognition

Alternative

Did chimps discriminate between the two situations based on subtle differences in how the “guesser” and “knower” acted?

Maybe they choose the one with eyes open during hiding?

Page 16: Cognition

“Begging Experiment” Povinelli (1999)

Beg from “seeing” vs. “nonseeing”

Front vs. Back – Yes Pail Beside vs. Over Head - No Averted Eyes vs. Over Shoulder Look –

No Blindfold Mouth vs. Blindfold Eyes - No

Page 17: Cognition

“Chimps Fail Begging Experiment”

Page 18: Cognition

“Elephants Pass Begging Experiment”

However, this doesn’t imply elephants can “mind-read”

Page 19: Cognition

Mark TestGallup’s Mark Test (Great Apes)

Page 20: Cognition

Mirror self-recognition: Chimp, Bonobo – Yes Orang-utan, Gorilla – Yes Elephants – Maybe? Dolphins –Maybe? Pigeons –No

Page 21: Cognition

Human versus Chimps

Mind-reading Pointing Impulsive Cooperation Imitation Vis Memory Aud Memory Deception

Poor No More Trainable Emulation Better Good Poor

Good Yes Less Spontaneous Slavishly Good Better Excellent

Skill ChimpHuman