COGNITION

16
COGNITION Definition “process of organizing information to solve a problem” thinking, decision making reasoning, judging, imagining All depend on learning & memory

description

COGNITION. Definition “process of organizing information to solve a problem” thinking, decision making reasoning, judging, imagining All depend on learning & memory. History of Intelligence: Plato, Galton, Binet. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of COGNITION

Page 1: COGNITION

COGNITION

Definition

“process of organizing informationto solve a problem”

– thinking, decision making– reasoning, judging, imagining

All depend on learning & memory

Page 2: COGNITION
Page 3: COGNITION

History of Intelligence:Plato, Galton, Binet

“No two persons are born exactlyalike, but each differs from the other by

natural endowments, one being more suitedfor one occasion and the other for another”

Page 4: COGNITION

Alfred Binet and theIntelligence Quotient (IQ)

• First calculate the child’s mental age– corresponds to the age of ability– 9 yr old with a mental age of 7 would struggle

• Divide mental age by chronological age

IQ = 100 * MA / CA

125 = 100*10/8

Page 5: COGNITION
Page 6: COGNITION

Intelligence:What is it?

Not a thing, but a concept:“a person’s capacity forgoal-directed behaviour”

• Standardization, Reliability, & Validity• Culture-Free Intelligence Tests• Genetic and Environmental Influence• General vs. Specific Abilities

Page 7: COGNITION

Intelligence Testing:Standardization, Reliability, Validity

• Standardization– Uniform administration and performance norms

• Reliability– Consistent results; 102 – 53 – 146 in 3 months– Current test reliabilites are >.90 (high reliab.)

• Validity– Test measures what it is supposed to measure– Compare IQ score to other measures of IQ– Stanford-Binet vs. Wechsler (correls of .40-.75)

Page 8: COGNITION

Consistent Group Differencesin Intelligence Testing

• Male vs. Female

– Males: +45 math, +8 verbal SAT

• Black vs. White (Americans)

– Blacks: -15 Full IQ, -100 verbal/math SAT

• Japanese vs. American

– Japanese: <3% popln, >25% science awards

Page 9: COGNITION

Bias in Intelligence Testing:What is a ‘regatta’?

• Are current tests of mental ability unfair to minority groups?– African Americans score 10-15 points lower– Review of evidence produced no clear explanation

• Tests typically assume the same educational and cultural experiences– Do the scores reflect a socially disadvantaged

environment; they still have predictive validity

Page 10: COGNITION

Intelligence:Culture Free Testing

• Intelligent behaviour varies by situation– South Pacific Islands, Manager, Inner City

Can we ever have a test of intelligenceuninfluenced by one’s culture?

(basic cognitive abilities)

• Initial results have been disappointing– Largely perceptual/spacial tasks– High SES and Europeans still score higher

Page 11: COGNITION

Source of Intelligence:Genetics vs. Environment

Sparks a fierce political debate

• Genetics“Do people with similar geneshave similar mental abilities?”

• Environment“Do life experiences matter,

and if so, how early?”

Page 12: COGNITION
Page 13: COGNITION

Six Explanations Why Group Differences are Environmental

Cultural differences in education

Barriers to disadvantaged groups

Adoption studies

Infant Picture Test

African ancestry

Rise & fall of all cultures

Page 14: COGNITION

Intelligence: GeneralVersus Specific Abilities

Should we represent intelligenceby one number or several numbers?

Specific– talents: math, music, dance, art, writing, sports– single number would be useless

General– general intelligence (g) underlies all abilities– appears to be true with physical ability

Page 15: COGNITION
Page 16: COGNITION