Code Governance Review Major Policy reform Proposals Gas Customer Forum 26 January 2009.
-
Upload
barnard-porter -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Code Governance Review Major Policy reform Proposals Gas Customer Forum 26 January 2009.
Code Governance ReviewMajor Policy reform
ProposalsGas Customer Forum
26 January 2009
2
Introduction
• Review initiated in November 2007
• 4 workstrands:– Governance of Charging methodologies;– Environment and code objectives
• This presentation:– Major Policy Review (including self governance)– Role of code administrators & participation of small
participants and consumer representatives
3
Background
• Some codes have been in place for some time.• Governance arrangements have facilitated incremental
changes well.• Plethora of change mechanisms• Encountered problems with major policy reform – TAR• Public policies are impacting on the industry more than
ever.
4
Industry Changes
• Regulatory changes– Sustainable development / environment,– Better regulation,– Appealibility of code decisions,– Requirement to undertake Impact Assessments.
• Market changes– New smaller participants,– Renewables / distributed generators,– Future changes – Smart Metering?
• European Policies
5
Current Code Governance Arrangements
• What are we trying to answer;
– Can current arrangements accommodate public policy reform?
– Do current arrangements promote inclusivity?
– Are current arrangements flexible enough to deal with future challenges?
6
Good governance principles
• Promote inclusive, accessible and effective consultation• Governance rules and processes transparent and easily
understood• Rules administered in independent and objective fashion• Provide rigorous and high quality analysis• Cost effective• Rules and processes flexible to allow effective change
management• Deliver in a manner that places a proportionate regulatory burden
7
Ofgem initiates review
Third party raises mod proposal
Categorisation / filtering
Merits appeal to
Ofgem
Ofgem-led policy review
process
Policy / principles decision –
legally-binding
Mod proposals
developed to implement
conclusions
Ofgem decision
Consultation and Panel
recommendation
PATH 2 – IMPROVED STATUS QUO
PATH 3 – SELF GOVERNANCE
PATH 1 – POLICY REVIEW
Standard CC merits
appeal
Consultation and Panel decision
Ofgems Reform Proposals
8
Key Issues (1)
• Categorisation / Filtering– First consider if a modification should proceed down path 1,– If not, by applying a further set of criteria to determine if it
should proceed along path 2 or 3.• Filtering mechanism
– Option A – Ofgem allocates modification– Option B – Industry allocates modification with Ofgem ability to
veto
9
Key Issues (2)
Self Governance• Key questions relating to the design of self governance:
– Who should be the decision maker for the modification?
– What voting procedures should apply governing decisions?
– Should there be mechanisms to send proposals to Path 2 (‘Improved status quo’)?
– What appeal rights should exist?
10
Key issues
Self Governance
• Panel Structure– Independent or representative ?– A mixture?
• Voting mechanism– Thresholds?– Constituency voting?– Majority ?
11
OfgemPolicy /
principles decision
Network / Panel
develops and raises
implementing mods
Option 1Ofgem
document contains policy principles only
Option 2Ofgem
document also outlines where
mods are needed
Option 3Ofgem
document also contains legal
drafting
Categorisation / filtering
Merits appeal to
Ofgem
Ofgemdecision
PATH 2 – IMPROVED STATUS QUO
PATH 3 – SELF GOVERNANCE
Standard CC merits
appeal
Consultation and Panel decision
Consultation and Panel
recommendation
Categorisation / filtering
Categorisation / filtering
Categorisation / filtering
Merits appeal to
Ofgem
Ofgemdecision
PATH 2 – IMPROVED STATUS QUO
PATH 3 – SELF GOVERNANCE
Standard CC merits
appeal
Consultation and Panel decision
Consultation and Panel
recommendation
Merits appeal to
Ofgem
Ofgemdecision
PATH 2 – IMPROVED STATUS QUO
PATH 3 – SELF GOVERNANCE
Standard CC merits
appeal
Consultation and Panel decision
Consultation and Panel
recommendation
Network / Panel further
develops implementing
mods
Note: over-riding code objective (and assessment criterion for mods): implement policy principles
Standard CC merits
appeal
Ofgemdecision
Consultation and Panel
recommendation
Implementing the outcome of major policy reviews
12
Safe Guards
• Appeals Mechanism
– Whichever option was adopted for the ‘outcome of the policy review’
• High Level binding conclusions• Detailed Binding Conclusions• Ofgem prepares modification and legal text
– At the end of the ‘outcome’ phase, we consider the Energy Act appeals mechanism would be applicable
13
Next Steps
• Ofgem workshop: 11 February, Victoria, London.
• Deadline for consultation responses: Friday 27 February.
QUESTIONS / OBSERVATIONS.