Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

download Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

of 29

Transcript of Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    1/29

    March2010ArabAcademyforScience&Technology&Maritime

    Transport-GraduateSchoolofBusinessPresentedto:

    Dr.HatemAlzuhairy

    BY:

    1.AmrEl-Sharkawy 2.AhmedElFar3.HossamSaber4.SalemAbdellatif5.TarekFahd

    THECOCA-COLACOMPANY

    STRATEGICMANAGEMENTCASESTUDY

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    2/29

    2

    I -TABLE OF CONTENTS

    S E C T I O N D E S C R I P T I O N P A G E

    I-TableofContents 2

    II-Introduction 3-4

    1 StrategyFormulation 5-18

    1.1 **Missionstatementevaluationmatrix 5-6

    1.2 **CPM,EFE&IFE 7-11

    1.3 Longtermobjectives 12

    1.4 ApplyingofSWOTmatrix&IEmatrix 13-14

    1.5 QuantitativeStrategicPlanningMatrix(QSPM) 15-18

    2 StrategyImplementation 19-22

    2.1 AnnualObjectives 19

    2.2 Organizationalstructure 20

    2.3 Production/Operation 21

    2.4 Therewards/Incentive 21-223 StrategyEvaluation 23

    3.1 BalancedScoreCard 23

    4 Conclusion 24

    5 References 25

    6 Appendixes 26-29

    AppendixA FinancialRatiosAnalysis(2009)

    26

    AppendixB IncomeStatementAnalysis(2009) 27AppendixC CashflowSTATEMENTAnalysis(2009)

    28

    AppendixD FinancialHighlights(2009) 29

    **EXTRAWORK

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    3/29

    3

    I I - INTRODUCTION

    TheCoca-ColaCompanyHistory

    TheprototypeCocaColarecipewas

    formulatedattheEagleDrugandChemical

    Company,adrugstoreinColumbus,

    GeorgiabyJohnPemberton,originallyasa

    cocawinecalledPemberton'sFrenchWine

    Cocoa.Hemayhavebeeninspiredbythe

    formidablesuccessofVinMariani,a

    Europeancocawine.

    In1886,whenAtlantaandFultonCountypassedprohibitionlegislation,Pemberton

    respondedbydevelopingCocaCola,essentiallyanon-alcoholicversionofFrenchWine

    Cola.ThefirstsaleswereatJacob'sPharmacyinAtlanta,Georgia,onMay8,1886.Itwas

    initiallysoldasapatentmedicineforfivecentsaglassatsodafountains,whichwere

    popularintheUnitedStatesatthetimeduetothebeliefthatcarbonatedwaterwas

    goodforthehealthPembertonclaimedCocaColacuredmanydiseases,including

    morphineaddiction,dyspepsia,neurasthenia,headache,andimpotence.Pembertonran

    thefirstadvertisementforthebeverageonMay29ofthesameyearintheAtlanta

    Journal.

    By1888,threeversionsofCocaColasoldbythreeseparatebusinesseswereon

    themarket.AsaGriggsCandleracquiredastakeinPemberton'scompanyin1887and

    incorporateditastheCocaColaCompanyin1888.Thesameyear,whilesufferingfrom

    anongoingaddictiontomorphine,Pembertonsoldtherightsasecondtimetofour

    morebusinessmen:J.C.Mayfield,A.O.Murphey,C.O.MullahyandE.H.Bloodworth.

    Meanwhile,Pemberton'salcoholicsonCharleyPembertonbegansellinghisown

    versionoftheproduct.

    JohnPembertondeclaredthatthename"CocaCola"belongedtoCharley,buttheother

    twomanufacturerscouldcontinuetousetheformula.So,inthesummerof1888,

    CandlersoldhisbeverageunderthenamesYumYumandKoke.Afterbothfailedto

    catchon,CandlersetouttoestablishalegalclaimtoCocaColainlate1888,inorderto

    forcehistwocompetitorsoutofthebusiness.Candlerpurchasedexclusiverightstothe

    formulafromJohnPemberton,MargaretDozierandWoolfolkWalker.However,in

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    4/29

    4

    1914,Doziercameforwardtoclaimhersignatureonthebillofsalehadbeenforged,

    andsubsequentanalysishasindicatedJohnPemberton'ssignaturewasmostlikelya

    forgeryaswell.

    NewCoke

    OnApril23,1985,CocaCola,amidmuchpublicity,attemptedtochangetheformulaof

    thedrinkwith"NewCoke".

    21stCentury

    LaunchaDietCokeproductsweetenedwiththeartificialsweetenersucralose

    ("Splenda"),thesamesweetenercurrentlyusedinPepsiOne

    March21,2005,itannouncedanotherdietproduct,CocaColasweetenedpartlywitha

    blendofaspartameandacesulfamepotassium.

    In2007,CocaColabegantosellanew"healthysoda":DietCokewithvitaminsB6,B12,

    magnesium,niacin,andzinc,marketedas"DietCokePlus."

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    5/29

    5

    1 - STRATEGY FORMULATION

    1.1-MISSIONSTATEMENTEVALUATIONMATRIX

    COCA-COLAMISSIONSTATEMENT:

    OurRoadmapstartswithourmission,whichisenduringItdeclaresourpurposeasacompanyandservesasthestandardagainstwhichweweighouractionsanddecisions.

    Torefreshtheworld...(1)and(3) Toinspiremomentsofoptimismandhappiness... Tocreatevalueandmakeadifference.(6)

    COMPONENTS Existinmissionstatement

    1. Customers YES

    2. ProductsServices NO3. Markets YES

    4. ConcernforSurvival,Growth,Profitability NO5. Technology NO

    6. Philosophy YES

    7. Self-Concept NO

    8. ConcernforPublicImage NO

    9. ConcernforEmployees NO

    * *PEPSICOMISSIONSTATEMENT:

    Ourmissionistobetheworld's(1)(3)premierconsumerproductscompanyfocusedonconvenientfoodsandbeverages(2).Weseektoproducefinancialrewardstoinvestors(4)asweprovideopportunitiesforgrowthandenrichmenttoouremployees(9),ourbusinesspartnersandthecommunitiesinwhichweoperate.Andineverythingwedo,westriveforhonesty,fairness(6)

    andintegrity(8).

    COMPONENTS Existinmissionstatement

    1. Customers YES2. ProductsServices YES

    3. Markets YES4. ConcernforSurvival,Growth,Profitability YES5. Technology NO

    6. Philosophy YES

    7. Self-Concept NO8. ConcernforPublicImage YES9. ConcernforEmployees YES

    **EXTRAWORK

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    6/29

    6

    * *COCA-COLAnewproposedmission:

    AtCocaColawebelieveourmainresponsibilityisprovidingcustomers(1)with

    refreshingbeveragesincludingsoftdrinks,water,energydrinks,juices,andtea(2)

    tofitanyoccasionintheirday-to-daylives(6).Oursignatureproduct,Coke(7),isa

    favoritearoundtheworldandawidevarietyofourproductsaresoldinover200

    nations(3).Weusetheonlythemostsophisticatedequipment(4)toprocessand

    makeourproductstoensureeachglassofCokeproductisasgoodasthelast(5).

    Ouremployees(9)arefairlycompensatedandwepracticefairtradeinallmarkets

    wecompete.Wevalueourresponsibilitytoallcommunitiesweserveandsupport

    manyeducationalandleadershipprograms(8).

    COMPONENTS Existinmissionstatement

    1. Customers YES

    2. ProductsServices YES

    3. Markets YES

    4. ConcernforSurvival,Growth,Profitability YES

    5. Technology YES

    6. Philosophy YES

    7. Self-Concept YES

    8. ConcernforPublicImage YES

    9. ConcernforEmployees YES

    *ASSUMPTION**EXTRAWORK

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    7/29

    7

    1 . 2 C P M , E F E A N D I F E M A T R I X E S

    1.2.1-**CPMCOMPETITIVEPROFILEMATRIX

    CPMCompetitiveprofilematrix isanessentialstrategicmanagementtooltocomparethefirm

    withthemajorplayersoftheindustry.Competitiveprofilematrixshowstheclearpicturetothe

    firmabouttheirstrongpointsandweakpointsrelativetotheircompetitors.

    CocaCola PepsiCo CadburySchweppes

    CriticalSuccess

    Factors*Weight *Rating

    Weighted

    Score*Rating

    Weighted

    Score*Rating

    Weighted

    Score

    MarketShare

    Price

    FinancialPosition

    ProductQuality

    ProductLines

    CustomerLoyalty

    Marketing

    Total

    0.15

    0.10

    0.12

    0.15

    0.15

    0.15

    0.07

    1.00

    40.60

    30.30

    30.36

    30.45

    30.45

    40.60

    30.21

    3.44

    30.45

    30.30

    40.48

    30.45

    40.60

    40.60

    30.21

    3.56

    20.30

    30.30

    30.36

    30.45

    30.45

    30.45

    20.14

    2.78

    *ASSUMPTION**EXTRAWORK

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    8/29

    8

    1.2.2-EFEMATRIXES

    ExternalFactorEvaluation(EFE)matrixmethodisastrategic-managementtooloftenusedforassessmentofanactualbusinessconditions.Itisagoodtooltovisualizeandprioritizetheopportunitiesandthreatsthatabusinessisfacing.

    ExternalfactorsassessedintheEFEmatrixaretheonesthataresubjectedtothewillofsocial,economic,political,legal,andotherexternalforces.

    KeyExternalFactors*Weight

    (../1)

    *Rating

    (../4)

    Weighted

    Score

    A-Opportunities:

    1-In2008,bottledwaterwasthesecondlargestselling

    drinkintheU.S.market0.06 4 0.24

    2-AccordingtotheDonkeyRecyclingInstitute,salesof

    flavored,noncarbonateddrinksareexpectedto

    surpasssodasalesby2010

    0.1 3 0.3

    3-Moderatecaffeineconsumptionappearedbeneficial

    inreducingriskofdeath0.05 2 0.1

    4-Today's24/7lifestylesisdrivingthesalesofenergy

    drinks,withvolumehavingincreasedbyanimpressive75%andvaluebysome71%since2000.

    0.1 4 0.4

    5-Doingbusinesswithpoorpeoplebringstheminto

    themarketplace.

    UseofManualDistributionCenters

    0.1 3 0.3

    6-Inaconditionwheremarketsshiftandcustomers

    preferencesbecomesmoreunpredictableand

    complex,adoptingCSRstrategycouldbeapowerfultoolforsurvival.

    0.05 3 0.15

    *ASSUMPTION

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    9/29

    9

    KeyExternalFactors*Weight

    (../1)

    *Rating

    (../4)

    Weighted

    Score

    B-Threats:

    1-Bottledwaterprocessedwithdistillationorreverse

    osmosislacksfluorideionswhicharesometimes

    naturallypresentingroundwater.Thedrinkingof

    distilledwatermayconceivablyincreasetheriskof

    toothdecayduetoalackofthiselement.

    0.05

    2

    0.1

    2-costofenergyisincreasing. 0.05 3 0.15

    3-Overallcarbonateddrinksaleshavebeenflatdueto

    linksofsugartoobesityandhighfructosecorn

    syruptoheartdisease.

    0.07 3 0.21

    4-Risingcostofrawmaterialsuchascorn,orange 0.09 3 0.27

    5-Waterscarcityandpoorqualitycouldnegatively

    impacttheCoca-Colasystemsproductioncostsand

    capacity.

    0.05 3 0.15

    6-Changesinlawsandregulationsrelatingto

    beveragecontainersandpackaging0.05 2 0.1

    7-Unfavorableeconomicandpoliticalconditionsin

    internationalmarkets0.03 2 0.06

    8-Significantadditionallabelingorwarning

    requirements0.06 4 0.24

    9-Changesincommercialandmarketpracticeswithin

    theEuropeanEconomicArea0.04 2 0.08

    10-Changesinaccountingstandardsandtaxation

    requirements 0.05 2 0.1

    TOTAL 1.00 2.95

    *ASSUMPTION

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    10/29

    10

    1.2.3-IFEMATRIXES

    InternalFactorEvaluation(IFE)matrixisastrategicmanagementtoolforauditingor

    evaluatingmajorstrengthsandweaknessesinfunctionalareasofabusiness.IFEmatrix

    alsoprovidesabasisforidentifyingandevaluatingrelationshipsamongthoseareas.

    KeyInternalFactors *Weight(../1)

    *Rating(../4)

    WeightedScore

    A-Strengths

    1-Productlinesof400Brands 0.05 4 0.2

    2-StrongManpowerresources(71,000)people 0.05 4 0.2

    3-7differentsegmentsallovertheworld(Africa,

    Asian,Europe,.)0.1 3 0.3

    4-LongHistory,Establishedsince1885(Brand

    Namereputation).0.05 4 0.2

    5-AfricaSectorisverystrong55,000outof

    71,0000.05 2 0.1

    6-Acquiringdifferentmineralwaterco.inmany

    placesintheworld.0.05 4 0.2

    7-HasStrongdigitalmarketingplatformlocated

    inLatinAmerica0.05 4 0.2

    8-Industryleaderinmarketcapitalizationwith

    $112billion0.1 4 0.4

    9-Topsellerinnonalcoholicmarketbeveragesin

    Russia0.05 3 0.15

    10-HasformedastrongapartnershipwithMcDonalds,biggestcustomer

    0.1 4 0.4

    11-JointventurewithNestleresultedin

    establishingbeveragespatternsworldwide0.05 4 0.25

    *ASSUMPTION

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    11/29

    11

    KeyInternalFactors*Weight

    (../1)

    *Rating

    (../4)

    Weighted

    Score

    B-Weaknesses

    1-Productlinesislimitedtobeveragesonly 0.05 1 0.05

    2-Afailed$16billionacquisitionofQuakerOatshinderslong-termgrowth.

    0.1 1 0.10

    3-NegativepublicityinIndiabecauseofwaterissues,hasledtopoorbrandimageandhinderedgrowththere.

    0.05 2 0.10

    4-Marketingdeficienciesduetoturnoverinleadershipanda16percentdecreaseinadvertisingspending.

    0.05 2 0.10

    5-RevenuesforUSmarketsegment

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    12/29

    12

    1.3-*COCACOLALONGTERMOBJECTIVES

    1- Increasethecompanyrevenueby50%intwoyears(currentrevenue24bill).

    2- Increasethebookvalue/shareby25%inthreeyears(currentvalue$8.52).

    3- Generatecashflowby1billintwoyears(currentvalue2,320bill).

    4- Increasethenetincomeby30%inthreeyears(currentvalue6,824bill).

    *ASSUMPTION

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    13/29

    13

    1 . 4 - A P P L Y I N G O F SW O T M A T R I X & I E M A T R I X

    1.4.1SWOTMATRIX

    SWOTMatrix:AtoolthatidentifiestheStrengths,Weaknesses,OpportunitiesandThreats

    ofanorganization.Specifically,SWOTisabasic,straightforwardmodelthatassesseswhat

    anorganizationcanandcannotdoaswellasitspotentialopportunitiesandthreats.ThemethodofSWOTanalysisistotaketheinformationfromanenvironmentalanalysisand

    separateitintointernal(strengthsandweaknesses)andexternalissues(opportunitiesand

    threats).Oncethisiscompleted,SWOTanalysisdetermineswhatmayassistthefirmin

    accomplishingitsobjectives,andwhatobstaclesmustbeovercomeorminimizedto

    achievedesiredresults.

    Strengths(S) Weaknesses(W)

    Opportunities(O) SOStrategies

    1. LaunchnewproductsinthelocalmarketssuchasHellenicCocaCola

    (S11,O2).

    2. Marketnewproductsthatishealthierandsuitableforthenewgeneration

    (S8,O4).

    WOStrategies

    1. MarketinternationalbeveragestoAmericanconsumers

    (W1,O1,O4).

    2. Increasemarketingeffortsforbottledwater

    (W1,O1).

    Threats(T) STStrategies

    1. AcquirekrispykremedoughnutsInc(KKD)forthediversificationofproducts(S6,T3).

    2. Establishajointventurewithothercompanies(i.e.illycoffee)forReadyToDrink

    beverages(RTD)(S8,T3)

    WTStrategies

    1. AcquireGoldenEnterprises(GLDC)tohelpdiversifytheproductline

    (W1,T3).

    2. PartnershipwithUNDPinEveryDropMatterprojectineasternEurope

    (W3,T5)

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    14/29

    14

    1.4.2IEINTERNAL-EXTERNALMATRIX

    TheInternal-External(IE)matrixisanotherstrategicmanagementtoolusedtoanalyzeworkingconditionsandstrategicpositionofabusiness.TheInternalExternalMatrixorshortIEmatrixisbasedonananalysisofinternalandexternalbusinessfactors

    whicharecombinedintoonesuggestivemodel.TheIEmatrixisacontinuationoftheEFEmatrixandIFEmatrixmodels.

    CocaColahaveStrongIFE&MediumEFE(Zone4)soGrow&Buildstrategieswillbeused:

    Integration(forward):Useofmanualdistributioncenters

    MarketPenetration:Increasemarketingbudget(i.e.createdigitalprogramwith

    iTunes;targetingaudiencesundertheageof12&mainsponsorofworldcup2010)

    andmorefocusonNorthUSmarket

    MarketDevelopment:energyandhealthydrinks

    ProductDevelopment:Foodindustry,InnovationinProducts(i.e.Jianchimeans

    "stronginnerenergy"inChinese.Thedrink,madewithfruitjuicesandplant

    extractsandavailableinthreeflavors,isinspiredbyancientChinesewisdomto

    enhancetheinnerbalance.Jianchiproductsarenowavailableinmorethan100

    pharmaciesandherbalshopsinMilan.)

    TheIFETotalWeightedScore=3.05

    Strong Average Weak

    3.0to4.0 2.0to2.99 1.0to1.99

    High I II III

    3.0to3.99

    Medium IV V VI

    2.0to2.99

    Coca-Cola

    Low VII VIII IX

    TheE

    FETotalWeightedScore=2

    .95

    1.0to1.99

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    15/29

    15

    1.5-QUANTITATIVESTRATEGICPLANNINGMATRIX(QSPM)

    QuantitativeStrategicPlanningMatrix(QSPM)isahigh-levelstrategicmanagement

    approachforevaluatingpossiblestrategies.QuantitativeStrategicPlanningMatrixora

    QSPMprovidesananalyticalmethodforcomparingfeasiblealternativeactions.

    AcquireKKD

    andGLDC

    (Diversifyfood

    productslines)

    Producenewdiet

    drinksthathavehealthiersugar

    substitutes

    Increase

    marketingeffortsfor

    bottledwater

    KeyExternalFactors

    WeightedScore

    (FromEFE)

    *AS TAS *AS TAS *AS TAS

    Opportunity

    1-In2008,bottledwaterwasthesecondlargestsellingdrinkintheU.S.market

    0.06 - - -

    2-AccordingtotheDonkeyRecyclingInstitute,salesofflavored,noncarbonateddrinksareexpectedtosurpasssodasalesby2010

    0.1 3 0.3 4 0.4 2 0.2

    3-Moderatecaffeineconsumptionappearedbeneficialinreducingriskofdeath

    0.05 3 0.15 4 0.2 2 0.1

    4-Today's24/7lifestylesisdrivingthesalesofenergydrinks,with

    volumehavingincreasedbyanimpressive75%andvaluebysome71%since2000.

    0.1 - - -

    5-Doingbusinesswithpoorpeoplebringsthemintothemarketplace.

    UseofManualDistributionCenters

    0.1 - - -

    6-Inaconditionwheremarketsshiftandcustomerspreferencesbecomesmoreunpredictableand

    complex,adoptingCSRstrategycouldbeapowerfultoolforsurvival.

    0.05 - - -

    *ASSUMPTION

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    16/29

    16

    AcquireKKD

    andGLDC

    (Diversifyfood

    productslines)

    Producenewdiet

    drinksthathave

    healthiersugar

    substitutes

    Increase

    marketing

    effortsfor

    bottledwater

    KeyInternalFactors

    WeightedScore

    (FromIFE)

    *AS TAS *AS TAS *AS TAS

    Threats

    1-Bottledwaterprocessedwithdistillationorreverseosmosislacksfluorideionswhicharesometimesnaturallypresentingroundwater.Thedrinkingofdistilledwatermayconceivablyincreasetheriskoftoothdecayduetoalackofthiselement.

    0.05

    2 0.1 3 0.15 4 0.2

    2-Costofenergyisincreasing. 0.05 - - -

    3-Overallcarbonateddrinksaleshavebeenflatduetolinksofsugartoobesityandhighfructosecornsyruptoheartdisease.

    0.07 3 0.21 4 0.28 2 0.14

    4-Risingcostofrawmaterialsuchascorn,orange

    0.09 - - -

    5-WaterscarcityandpoorqualitycouldnegativelyimpacttheCoca-Colasystemsproductioncostsandcapacity.

    0.05 - - -

    6-Changesinlawsandregulationsrelatingtobeveragecontainersandpackaging

    0.05 - - -

    7-Unfavorableeconomicandpoliticalconditionsininternationalmarkets

    0.03 - - -

    8-Significantadditionallabelingorwarningrequirements

    0.06 - - -

    9-ChangesincommercialandmarketpracticeswithintheEuropean

    EconomicArea

    0.04 - - -

    10-Changesinaccountingstandardsandtaxationrequirements

    0.05 - - -

    SUBTOTAL 1.00 0.88 1.15 0.88

    *ASSUMPTION

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    17/29

    17

    AcquireKKD

    andGLDC

    (diversifyfood

    productslines)

    Producenewdiet

    drinksthathave

    healthiersugar

    substitutes

    Increase

    marketing

    effortsfor

    bottledwater

    KeyInternalFactors

    Wei

    ghtedScore

    (FromIFE)

    *AS TAS *AS TAS *AS TAS

    Strengths

    1-Productlinesof400Brands 0.05 2 0.1 4 0.2 3 0.15

    2-StrongManpowerresources(

    71,000)people0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 2 0.1

    3-7differentsegmentsalloverthe

    world(Africa,Asian,Europe,.)

    0.1 - - -

    4-LongHistory,Establishedsince

    1885.0.05 2 0.1 3 0.15 4 0.2

    5-AfricaSectorisverystrong

    55,000outof71,0000.05 - -- -

    6-Acquiringdifferentmineral

    waterco.inmanyplacesinthe

    world.

    0.05 3 0.15 3 0.15 4 0.2

    7-HasStrongdigitalmarketing

    platformlocatedinLatin

    America

    0.05 - - -

    8-Industryleaderinmarket

    capitalizationwith$112billion0.1 4 0.4 3 0.3 3 0.3

    9-Topsellerinnonalcoholic

    marketbeveragesinRussia0.05 - - -

    10-Hasformedastronga

    partnershipwithMcDonalds,biggestcustomer

    0.1 - - -

    11-JointventurewithNestle

    resultedinestablishing

    beveragespatternsworldwide

    0.05 - - -

    *ASSUMPTION

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    18/29

    18

    AcquireKKD

    andGLDC

    (diversifyfood

    productslines)

    Producenewdiet

    drinksthathave

    healthiersugar

    substitutes

    Increase

    marketing

    effortsfor

    bottledwater

    KeyInternalFactors

    Wei

    ghtedScore

    (FromIFE)

    *AS TAS *AS TAS *AS TAS

    Weaknesses

    1-Productlinesislimitedto

    beveragesonly0.05 4 0.2 3 0.15 2 0.1

    2-Afailed$16billionacquisitionofQuakerOatshinderslong-termgrowth.

    0.1 - - -

    3-NegativepublicityinIndia

    becauseofwaterissues,hasledtopoorbrandimageandhinderedgrowththere.

    0.05 - - -

    4-Marketingdeficienciesduetoturnoverinleadershipanda16percentdecreaseinadvertisingspending.

    0.05 - - -

    5-RevenuesforUSmarket

    segment

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    19/29

    19

    2 - STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION

    2.1-*ANNUALOBJECTIVES:

    R&DFUNCTION:

    1. Developtwonewproductsinthefoodindustry.2. Developonenewhealthybeverageproduct.

    PRODUCTIONFUNCTION:

    1. Increasetheinventoryturnoverto7.2. Implementanewqualitycontrolsystemforfoodindustry.3. Decreasetheproductionunitcasecostby5%.4. Implementnew3foodproductionlinesinEurope.5. Implementnew3foodproductionlinesinNorthAmerica.

    6. Increasethebeverageproductionby5%.7. Increasethebottledindustryproductionby10%.

    MARKETINGFUNCTION:

    1. Increasethebeveragemarketshareby2%(from54to56)2. Increasethesalesvolumeby4%

    FINANCINGFUNCTION:

    1. Reducethecompanyliabilitiesby5%annually2. Financenew6foodplants.

    HUMANRESOURCESFUNCTION:

    1. Hiringspecializedstaffforfoodindustry1200employees.2. Developemployeesby15daystraining.3. Decreasetheemployeesturnoverby50%.

    *ASSUMPTION

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    20/29

    20

    2.2-*ORGANIZATIONALSTRUCTURE

    Tohandletheenormouscapacityofitsbusiness,theCocaColaCompanyhasdividedup

    intosixoperatingunits

    Therefore,CocaColaispredominantlyorganizedintoaninternationalareastructure

    consideredasaglobalproductdivisionalstructure.

    Tomeetandmatchtheorganizationstructurewiththeformulatedstrategies,newfoodindustrydirectorwillbeaddedtostructuretomanagethenewfoodsector.

    Newhealthybeveragewillbemanagedlikethesoftdrinksbeverages.

    ADVANTAGESOFTHISDIVISIONALSTRUCTURE:

    Workflowperdivision

    LowlevelofCentralization

    Flexibleandinnovative

    Sensitivetosubtledifferencesacrossproducts,regions,andclients

    *ASSUMPTION

    Chairman

    / CEO

    EVP

    & P BI/SC

    EVP

    & CFO

    EVP

    & P MKT

    President

    & COO

    SVP

    & GC

    SVP

    & HRD

    SVP

    & PAD

    P of

    Eurasia

    P of

    Pacific

    P of

    Latin

    America

    P of

    Africa

    P of

    Europe

    *FOODINDUSTRY

    DIRECTO

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    21/29

    21

    2.3PRODUCTION/OPERATIONS

    CostControl,oneofthemanagementissuesinoperationsiscostreductionorcost

    optimization.ItisclearintheCocaColaincomestatementsthatCocaColapractices

    costreductionin2009from11,374,000,000$to11,088,000,000$andtheRevenue

    decreasedfrom31,944,000,000$to30,990,000,000$socostcontrolshouldbe

    donethroughoptimizetheprocessofoperation(Rawmaterial,powerconsumption,

    fuelconsumption),costofunitcasemustbemonitored.

    Inventory/InventoryControlisthemainforoperationmanagementconcerns,itis

    calculatedfromthebalancesheetthattheCocaColainventoryturnoverratiois4.9

    whichislessthantheindustryaverage7.1,andsoCoca-Colashoulddevelopand

    revisetheinventorycontrolsystemtoreachtheindustryaverage.

    Plantsize,foodandsnakeswillbeanewindustryforCocaCola,sonewproduction

    linesintheexistingplantsshouldbeestablishedforfoodindustry,capacitywillbe

    basedonthemarketingforecast,sositelocationanalysisisveryimportant.

    Forfoodindustry,Purchasespecializedequipmentandaddspecializedpeople(humanresources).

    ForFoodindustry,applythequalitycontrolsystemtomeetthecustomer

    satisfaction.

    2.4-THEREWARDS/INCENTIVESYSTEM

    1-THEANNUALINCENTIVEPROGRAM

    Salesofcompanyproducts(volume)andeconomicprofit(profit).Thesetwo

    objectivesbecomethetargetforthedivisionforannualincentivepurposes.Forcorporateassociates,thetargetforincentivepurposesistheobjectiveforthetotalcompany.

    Attheendoftheyear,theperformanceofeachdivisionisassessedversusits

    objectivesfortheyearrelativetoafundingmatrix.Thematrixweightsvolumeandprofit

    equally.Ifdivisionsmeettheirobjectivesexactly,thenincentivesarefundedat100%of

    target.Iftheyexceedobjectives,theyarefundedatgreaterthan100%,andiftheyfall

    short,theyarefundedatlessthan100%. Thetargetedpoolitselfissimplythetotal

    amountrequiredtoawardeachparticipantintheplantheirexacttarget,whichis

    expressedasapercentofbasesalary(e.g.,10%,15%)basedonjobgradelevel.

    Oncethepoolforthedivisionisfunded,thendivisionmanagementdecideshowtheexactpoolwillbedistributed.Eachdivisionhastheresponsibilitytosetspecificteamand

    individualobjectivesthatlinkintothetotaldivisionobjectives.Basedonindividualandteamperformanceagainstthoseobjectives,eachparticipantthenreceivesaspecificannual

    incentiveaward,whichfallswithinabroadrangefromnoawardtothemaximumaward.It

    istheresponsibilityofeachdivisiontomakesurethattotalincentiveawardsdonotexceed

    theamountallocatedandthatthetotalawardsbalanceagainstthepool.

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    22/29

    22

    2-THESTOCKOPTIONSPROGRAM

    Theprocessforstockoptionawardsissimilartothatofannualincentives:Option

    poolsarefundedbasedonperformanceagainstunitcasesalesandeconomicprofit

    objectives,andindividualoptiongrantsaredeterminedbasedonspecificcontributionto

    thoseobjectives.

    Stockoptionawardsareconsideredannuallyandfallwithinaminimumtomaximumofaspecifiedrange,whichvariesbygradelevelandisdrivenbytargetedtotal

    compensationlevelsversusthemarketplace.Divisionmanagementconsiderseacheligible

    associateeachyearforanappropriategrantandthenrecommendsthatamountfor

    approvalbythecompensationcommitteeoftheboard.Forbothannualincentivesand

    stockoptions,awardsforcorporateassociatescomefromandmustbalanceagainstthecorporatepool,whichisbasedontotalcompanyperformance.

    IMPACTOFTHEPROGRAMS:

    Theeffectonthebusinessoftheclearlinkageofincentiveandstockoptionawards

    toeconomicprofithasbeenverypositive.Someofthebenefitsincludethefollowing:

    1.Moreattentionisgivenintheplanningprocesstotheamountandcostofcapital

    requiredtodelivervolumeandprofitresults.

    2.Managersandassociatesnowfocusmoredailyattentionthanevernotonlyon

    generatingvolumeandprofit,butdoingsoinawaythatcoverscapitalcostsandenhances

    shareownervalue.

    3.Thecommunicationeffortssurroundingtheimportanceofvalue-basedmanagementare

    reinforcedfinanciallytwiceayearthroughincentiveandstockoptionawards.

    4.Theeconomicprofitlevelsofthecompanyandtheresultingincreaseinshareownervaluecontinuetogrowathealthyrates.Figure3-1showsthataseconomicprofitgrewan

    averageof20.2%peryearfor10yearsendingwith1997,stockpricegrewanaverageof

    30.2%peryearforthesameperiod.

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    23/29

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    24/29

    24

    4 - CONCLUSION

    Tosurviveinthemarketyouhavetocompete,tocompeteinthemarketyouhaveto

    grow.

    CocaColaalwayscompeteswithPepsi,soCocaColashouldlookforitscompetitive

    advantagestobemarketleader.

    CocaColashouldintegrateitsbusinessinthehealthyandenergybeveragesto

    competewiththecompetitors.

    CocaColashoulddiversifyitsbusinessbyfoodindustrytoincreasethebeverages

    marketshareandreducetheriskprobabilities.

    CocaColashouldavidtobethefollowerinthemarkettodiscoveritscompetitive

    advantages.

    CocaColaleadsthedigitalmarketingphilosophyinthebeverageindustry.

    CocaColaandApplealliancesupportCoca-colainthecompetitionasanew

    innovatedmarketingidea.

    CocaColamustontheroadbysustainableindustrialdevelopmentoverthelong

    term.

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    25/29

    25

    5 - REFERENCES

    1-http://www.marketresearchworld.net

    2-http://www.thecoca-colacompany.com

    3-http://en.wikipedia.org

    4-http://www.maxi-pedia.com

    5-www.wilsongroup.com

    6-http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor/invsub/results

    7-http://www.pepsico.com/index.html#/flash/investormeeting_banner.swf

    8-StrategicManagementconceptsandcasesbyFredDavid12edition

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    26/29

    26

    6 - A P P E N D I X E S

    APPENDIXA-FINANCIALRATIOSANALYSIS(2009)

    GrowthRates% CocaCola IndustrySales(Qtrvsyearagoqtr) 5.40 5.10

    NetIncome(YTDvsYTD) 17.50 29.40

    NetIncome(Qtrvsyearagoqtr) 55.10 72.70

    Sales(5-YearAnnualAvg.) 7.35 8.59

    NetIncome(5-YearAnnualAvg.) 7.08 8.69

    Dividends(5-YearAnnualAvg.) 10.40 10.15

    PriceRatios CocaCola IndustryCurrentP/ERatio 18.7 18.4

    P/ERatio5-YearHigh NA 2.8

    P/ERatio5-YearLow NA 0.9

    Price/SalesRatio 4.07 3.13Price/BookValue 5.08 5.27

    Price/CashFlowRatio 15.50 13.70

    ProfitMargins% CocaCola IndustryGrossMargin 64.2 57.7

    Pre-TaxMargin 28.9 22.0

    NetProfitMargin 22.3 17.0

    5YrGrossMargin(5-YearAvg.) 64.6 58.0

    5YrPreTaxMargin(5-YearAvg.) 27.1 20.3

    5YrNetProfitMargin(5-YearAvg.) 20.7 15.3

    FinancialCondition CocaCola IndustryDebt/EquityRatio 0.48 1.29

    CurrentRatio 1.3 1.4

    QuickRatio 1.1 1.2

    InterestCoverage NA 2.5

    LeverageRatio 2.0 3.4

    BookValue/Share 10.77 11.06

    InvestmentReturns% CocaCola IndustryReturnOnEquity 30.2 37.6

    ReturnOnAssets 15.5 12.3

    ReturnOnCapital 22.4 17.5

    ReturnOnEquity(5-YearAvg.) 29.8 22.4

    ReturnOnAssets(5-YearAvg.) 15.7 11.9

    ReturnOnCapital(5-YearAvg.) 23.0 17.2

    ManagementEfficiency CocaCola IndustryIncome/Employee 74,418 59,283

    Revenue/Employee 333,944 321,203

    ReceivableTurnover 9.1 10.2

    InventoryTurnover 4.9 7.1

    AssetTurnover 0.7 0.8

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    27/29

    27

    APPENDIXB-INCOMESTATEMENTANALYSIS(2009)

    2009 2008 2007 2006 2005

    PeriodEndDate 12/31/2009 12/31/2008 12/31/2007 12/31/2006 12/31/200

    PeriodLength 12Months 12Months 12Months 12Months 12Months

    StmtSource 10-K 10-K 10-K 10-K 10-K

    StmtSourceDate 02/26/2010 02/26/2010 02/26/2010 02/21/2007 02/28/2006

    StmtUpdateType Updated Reclassified Reclassified Updated Updated

    Revenue 30,990.0 31,944.0 28,857.0 24,088.0 23,104.0

    TotalRevenue 30,990.0 31,944.0 28,857.0 24,088.0 23,104.0

    CostofRevenue,Total 11,088.0 11,374.0 10,406.0 8,164.0 8,195.0

    GrossProfit 19,902.0 20,570.0 18,451.0 15,924.0 14,909.0

    Selling/General/Administrative

    Expenses,Total 11,358.0 11,774.0 10,945.0 9,431.0 8,739.0

    Research&Development 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    Depreciation/Amortization 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    InterestExpense(Income),NetOperating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    UnusualExpense(Income) 313.0 350.0 0.0 185.0 85.0

    OtherOperatingExpenses,Total 0.0 0.0 254.0 0.0 0.0

    OperatingIncome 8,231.0 8,446.0 7,252.0 6,308.0 6,085.0

    InterestIncome(Expense),NetNon-Operating

    0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    Gain(Loss)onSaleofAssets 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    Other,Net 40.0 39.0 219.0 195.0 -93.0

    IncomeBeforeTax 8,946.0 7,506.0 7,919.0 6,578.0 6,690.0

    IncomeTax-Total 2,040.0 1,632.0 1,892.0 1,498.0 1,818.0

    IncomeAfterTax 6,906.0 5,874.0 6,027.0 5,080.0 4,872.0

    MinorityInterest -82.0 -67.0 -46.0 0.0 0.0

    EquityInAffiliates 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    U.S.GAAPAdjustment 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    NetIncomeBeforeExtra.Items 6,824.0 5,807.0 5,981.0 5,080.0 4,872.0

    TotalExtraordinaryItems 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    NetIncome 6,824.0 5,807.0 5,981.0 5,080.0 4,872.0

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    28/29

    28

    APPENDIXC-CASHFLOWSTATEMENTANALYSIS(2009)

    2009 2008 2007 2006 2005

    PeriodEndDate 12/31/2009 12/31/2008 12/31/2007 12/31/2006 12/31/2005

    PeriodLength 12Months 12Months 12Months 12Months 12Months

    StmtSource 10-K 10-K 10-K 10-K 10-K

    StmtSourceDate 02/26/2010 02/26/2010 02/26/2010 02/21/2007 02/28/2006StmtUpdateType Updated Reclassified Reclassified Updated Updated

    NetIncome/StartingLine 6,906.0 5,874.0 6,027.0 5,080.0 4,872.0

    Depreciation/Depletion 1,236.0 1,228.0 1,163.0 938.0 932.0

    Amortization 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    DeferredTaxes 353.0 -360.0 109.0 -35.0 -88.0

    Non-CashItems

    255.0 1,584.0 -109.0 589.0 277.0

    ChangesinWorkingCapital

    -564.0 -755.0 -40.0 -615.0 430.0

    CashfromOperatingActivities 8,186.0 7,571.0 7,150.0 5,957.0 6,423.0

    CapitalExpenditures

    -1,993.0 -1,968.0 -1,648.0 -1,407.0 -899.0

    OtherInvestingCashFlowItems,Total

    -2,156.0 -395.0 -5,071.0 -293.0 -597.0

    CashfromInvesting

    Activities-4,149.0 -2,363.0 -6,719.0 -1,700.0 -1,496.0

    FinancingCashFlow

    Items0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

    TotalCashDividendsPaid

    -3,800.0 -3,521.0 -3,149.0 -2,911.0 -2,678.0

    Issuance(Retirement)ofStock,Net

    -856.0 -493.0 -219.0 -2,268.0 -1,825.0

    Issuance(Retirement)ofDebt,Net

    2,363.0 29.0 4,341.0 -1,404.0 -2,282.0

    CashfromFinancing

    Activities-2,293.0 -3,985.0 973.0 -6,583.0 -6,785.0

    ForeignExchangeEffects 576.0 -615.0 249.0 65.0 -148.0

    NetChangeinCash 2,320.0 608.0 1,653.0 -2,261.0 -2,006.0

  • 8/9/2019 Coca Cola 2009 Case Study

    29/29

    APPENDIXD-FINANCIALHIGHLIGHTS(2009)

    Financial Highlights

    Sales 30.99 Bil

    Income 6.82 Bil

    Net Profit Margin 22.28%Return on Equity 30.15%

    Debt/Equity Ratio 0.48

    Revenue/Share 13.31

    Earnings/Share 2.93

    Book Value/Share 10.77

    Dividend Rate 1.76

    Payout Ratio 56.00%

    Revenue - Quarterly Results (in Millions)

    FY (12/09) FY (12/08) FY (12/07)

    1st Qtr 7,169.0 7,379.0 6,103.0

    2nd Qtr 8,267.0 9,046.0 7,733.0

    3rd Qtr 8,044.0 8,393.0 7,690.0

    4th Qtr 7,510.0 7,126.0 7,331.0

    Total 30,990.0 31,944.0 28,857.0

    Earnings Per Share - Quarterly Results

    FY (12/09) FY (12/08) FY (12/07)

    1st Qtr $0.58 $0.65 $0.55

    2nd Qtr $0.88 $0.61 $0.80

    3rd Qtr $0.82 $0.82 $0.72

    4th Qtr $0.67 $0.43 $0.52Total $2.95 $2.51 $2.59

    Qtr. over Qtr. EPS Growth Rate

    FY (12/09) FY (12/08) FY (12/07)1st Qtr 35% 25% ---

    2nd Qtr 52% -6% 45%

    3rd Qtr -7% 34% -10%

    4th Qtr -18% -48% -28%

    Yr. over Yr. EPS Growth Rate

    FY (12/09) FY (12/08)1st Qtr -11% 18%

    2nd Qtr 44% -24%

    3rd Qtr 0% 14%

    4th Qtr 56% -17%