Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite...

10
Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ, 1,3 HIMANI SHARMA, 1 G. PRASHANT REDDY, 1 NEVIN ALTUNYURT, 1 MADHAVAN SWAMINATHAN, 1 RAO TUMMALA, 1 and VIJAY NAIR 2 1.—Packaging Research Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0560, USA. 2.—Intel Corporation, 5000 W. Chandler Boulevard, Chandler, AZ 85226, USA. 3.—e-mail: [email protected] Cobalt–polymer magnetic nanocomposites have been synthesized and char- acterized for their microstructure and properties such as permeability, per- mittivity, dielectric and magnetic losses from 100 MHz to 2 GHz to study their suitability as antenna dielectrics. Oxide-passivated cobalt nanoparticles were dispersed in epoxies to form nanocomposite toroids and thin-film resonator structures on organic substrates. Permeabilities of 2.10 and 2.65 were mea- sured up to 500 MHz, respectively, with 25-nm to 50-nm and 5-nm nanopar- ticles in the nanocomposites. The loss tangent ranged from 0.02 to 0.04 at these frequencies. A combination of stable permeability of 2 at 1 GHz to 2 GHz and permittivity of 7 was achieved with nanocomposites having 5-nm nanoparticles. The magnetic nanomaterials described in this paper can over- come the limitations from domain-wall and eddy-current losses in microscale metal–polymer composites, leading to enhanced frequency stability. The paper also demonstrates integration of metal–polymer nanocomposites as thin-film build-up layers with two-metal-layer structures on organic substrates. Key words: Antenna, nanocomposites, substrates, integration, magnetodielectrics, magnetic loss INTRODUCTION Current and emerging radiofrequency (RF) sub- systems need materials and structures with higher permittivity and permeability along with frequency and thermal stability, and low loss. These properties are critical for component and system performance enhancement, system integration, and miniaturi- zation. 1 Existing RF materials such as low-temper- ature cofired ceramics (LTCCs) and polymer dielectrics show fundamental limitations in terms of component miniaturization because of their inferior properties such as low permittivity and absence of magnetic properties. Enhancement in permittivity or permeability usually comes at the expense of dielectric loss, and temperature and frequency dependence of properties, which makes them unsuitable for use in high-performance RF compo- nents. 2 Amongst the RF components, the antenna is still considered a major barrier to system minia- turization because the performance of an antenna is directly dependent on its physical size. 3 To decrease the size of an antenna, it has to be surrounded by a material with either high permittivity (e) or per- meability (l), which would shorten the wavelength by a factor of 1= ffiffiffiffiffi el p 4,5 and lead to miniaturized designs. Over the past decade, the materials employed in high-frequency planar antennas were mostly limited to thick-film LTCCs 6,7 owing to their low loss, stable properties, and partial integration capability, although end-systems made using these technologies are still bulky and costly. Polymer dielectrics, on the other hand, provide the benefits of low-cost manufacturing and total integration capa- bilities with other polymer-based systems. However, traditional organic materials such as epoxies have high electrical losses at high frequencies, while (Received September 4, 2013; accepted January 9, 2014; published online February 8, 2014) Journal of ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2014 DOI: 10.1007/s11664-014-3025-5 Ó 2014 TMS 1097

Transcript of Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite...

Page 1: Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT

Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for MiniaturizedAntennas

P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT REDDY,1

NEVIN ALTUNYURT,1 MADHAVAN SWAMINATHAN,1 RAO TUMMALA,1

and VIJAY NAIR2

1.—Packaging Research Center, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0560, USA.2.—Intel Corporation, 5000 W. Chandler Boulevard, Chandler, AZ 85226, USA. 3.—e-mail:[email protected]

Cobalt–polymer magnetic nanocomposites have been synthesized and char-acterized for their microstructure and properties such as permeability, per-mittivity, dielectric and magnetic losses from 100 MHz to 2 GHz to study theirsuitability as antenna dielectrics. Oxide-passivated cobalt nanoparticles weredispersed in epoxies to form nanocomposite toroids and thin-film resonatorstructures on organic substrates. Permeabilities of 2.10 and 2.65 were mea-sured up to 500 MHz, respectively, with 25-nm to 50-nm and 5-nm nanopar-ticles in the nanocomposites. The loss tangent ranged from 0.02 to 0.04 atthese frequencies. A combination of stable permeability of �2 at 1 GHz to2 GHz and permittivity of �7 was achieved with nanocomposites having 5-nmnanoparticles. The magnetic nanomaterials described in this paper can over-come the limitations from domain-wall and eddy-current losses in microscalemetal–polymer composites, leading to enhanced frequency stability. The paperalso demonstrates integration of metal–polymer nanocomposites as thin-filmbuild-up layers with two-metal-layer structures on organic substrates.

Key words: Antenna, nanocomposites, substrates, integration,magnetodielectrics, magnetic loss

INTRODUCTION

Current and emerging radiofrequency (RF) sub-systems need materials and structures with higherpermittivity and permeability along with frequencyand thermal stability, and low loss. These propertiesare critical for component and system performanceenhancement, system integration, and miniaturi-zation.1 Existing RF materials such as low-temper-ature cofired ceramics (LTCCs) and polymerdielectrics show fundamental limitations in terms ofcomponent miniaturization because of their inferiorproperties such as low permittivity and absence ofmagnetic properties. Enhancement in permittivityor permeability usually comes at the expense ofdielectric loss, and temperature and frequencydependence of properties, which makes them

unsuitable for use in high-performance RF compo-nents.2 Amongst the RF components, the antenna isstill considered a major barrier to system minia-turization because the performance of an antenna isdirectly dependent on its physical size.3 To decreasethe size of an antenna, it has to be surrounded by amaterial with either high permittivity (e) or per-meability (l), which would shorten the wavelengthby a factor of 1=

ffiffiffiffiffi

elp 4,5 and lead to miniaturized

designs. Over the past decade, the materialsemployed in high-frequency planar antennas weremostly limited to thick-film LTCCs6,7 owing to theirlow loss, stable properties, and partial integrationcapability, although end-systems made using thesetechnologies are still bulky and costly. Polymerdielectrics, on the other hand, provide the benefits oflow-cost manufacturing and total integration capa-bilities with other polymer-based systems. However,traditional organic materials such as epoxies havehigh electrical losses at high frequencies, while

(Received September 4, 2013; accepted January 9, 2014;published online February 8, 2014)

Journal of ELECTRONIC MATERIALS, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2014

DOI: 10.1007/s11664-014-3025-5� 2014 TMS

1097

Page 2: Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT

low-loss organics based on fluoropolymers, benzocyc-lobutene (BCB), and others have low permittivity andno magnetic properties. These limitations lead to largecomponent designs, and also make it extremely diffi-cult to build integrated high-performance front-endmodules.8,9

Magnetic films provide unique opportunities toaddress the fundamental limitations of traditionalRF dielectrics. In addition to enhancing the induc-tance density through higher permeability, mag-netic films can also potentially lead to a dramaticreduction in antenna size because of their combinedeffect of high permittivity and permeability. Com-pared with traditional polymer dielectrics, increasesin the permeability and permittivity by fourfold inmagnetic nanocomposites can reduce antennadimensions by a factor of four, resulting in signifi-cant antenna miniaturization. By tuning the for-mulation, materials can be designed to have lowerpermittivity-to-permeability ratio to achieve goodimpedance matching with that of free space.10 Theantenna bandwidth on such magnetic substrateswill therefore be wider than that with high-per-mittivity dielectric substrates11–13 that provide thesame miniaturization from the permittivity alone.The high permeability suppresses backscatteringand improves the radiation efficiency, resulting infurther performance enhancement.2 Magneticmaterials have been widely studied at frequenciesabove 100 MHz. They are classified into ferrites,microscale metal composites, nanoscale metal com-posites, and anisotropic composite structures andare briefly reviewed here in these categories.

Compounds of ferrites and other oxides are widelyused for microwave applications such as circulators,isolators, and phase-shifters because of their higherresistivity resulting in lower eddy-current losses andfrequency stability.14 Recent study showed stableproperties in nanocomposites containing ferritenanoparticles, with permeabilities of 5 to 10 up to15 GHz.15 Compounds based on BaO, Fe2O3, andother oxides (MO, M = Co, Ni, etc.) with hexagonalstructures are more suited for high-frequency appli-cations.16 When Co is the other oxide used along withBaO and Fe2O3, they are classified as Co2M (bariumhexaferrite, BaFe12O19), Co2Y (Ba2Co2Fe12O22), orCo2Z (mixtures of M and Y, Ba3Co2Fe12O41).Recently, hexaferrites and their nanocompositeswith glass and polymer were characterized forantennas.17–19 Co2Z hexaferrites showed permeabil-ity of above 10 at 300 MHz to 400 MHz.19 Perme-ability of �2 with loss of 0.03 has been shown forferrite–glass nanocomposites with frequency stabil-ity of up to 2 GHz to 3 GHz.18

Traditional metal-based magnetic composites atsubmicro- or microscale also do not show adequatefrequency stability and low loss. The eddy-currentlosses are directly proportional to the particle sizeand are therefore higher for microscale particles20

compared with nanoparticles. Larger particles also

have multiple domains which generate additionallosses due to domain-wall resonance.21 Severalstudies on magnetic metal–polymer compositeshave been reported, particularly focusing on theiron–polymer and NiFe–polymer systems.22–25 Withlarge, microsized particles, permeabilities of above100 are reported. These particles show lower coer-civity and higher intrinsic permeability. However,the magnetic losses become significant even at1 MHz.

The frequency stability of microscale compositescan be enhanced with anisotropic structures. Stud-ies on NiFe alloy flake–polymer nanocompositesshowed permeabilities of 5 to 10 with losses of above0.1 at 1 GHz.26 In another study by Yang et al.,27

oriented flake-shaped Fe alloy particles mixed in aparaffin matrix showed permeability of 8 at100 MHz and 3.9 up to 2 GHz. Oriented ferrite filmswith hard axis in the direction perpendicular to thefilm plane have also been shown to have enhancedfrequency stability.28

Magnetic materials that comprise nanoscale metalparticles in an amorphous matrix provide uniqueopportunities to address the fundamental limitationsof microscale magnetic materials. Higher perme-ability and frequency stability can be achieved inmagnetic nanocomposites by reducing the particlesize and the separation between neighboring metalparticles down to the nanoscale, which leads tomagnetic exchange coupling phenomena;29,30 Forexample, Co- or Fe-based nanocomposites show muchhigher permeability and frequency stability atmicrowave frequencies than those obtained frombulk Co or Fe metal or their microscale composites.31

The exchange coupling interaction, which leads tomagnetic ordering within a grain, extends out to theneighboring environments within a characteristicdistance, lex, which is �20 nm for Fe or Co.32,33 Theexchange interaction in nanocomposites also leads tocancelation of the magnetic anisotropy of individualparticles and the demagnetizing effect, leading tohigher permeability and lower coercivity.34 Becauseof the nanosized metal particles, the eddy currentsproduced within the particles are also negligiblysmall, leading to much lower loss for nanocomposites,compared with conventional microsized ferrites orpowder materials. These nanomagnetic structureswith high permeability were mostly obtainedthrough sputtering, which cannot yield the thickmagnetic films required for antenna applications.Nanoparticle composites in polymer matrices syn-thesized via chemical synthesis routes can accom-plish this. However, they do not show such highpermeability as sputtered films, although they haveimproved frequency stability and lower losscompared with their microstructured counter-parts.28,33,35–39 Anisotropic one-dimensional nano-structures based on nickel or cobalt nanowires orfilaments have been studied to overcome thelimitations of isotropic nanocomposites. Nanowire

Raj, Sharma, Reddy, Altunyurt, Swaminathan, Tummala, and Nair1098

Page 3: Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT

Ta

ble

I.S

ele

cte

drefe

ren

ces

on

ma

gn

eto

die

lectr

ics

an

dth

eir

ele

ctr

om

ag

neti

cp

ro

perti

es

at

mic

ro

wa

ve

freq

uen

cie

s

Ma

teria

lS

tru

ctu

re

Pro

perti

es

Freq

uen

cy

Ref.

Pass

ivate

dm

etal

nan

opart

icle

s(N

iFe)

�100-n

mp

art

icle

sP

erm

eabil

ity:

12

1G

Hz

38

Oxid

e-p

ass

ivate

dir

onan

dn

ick

eln

an

ocom

pos

ites

�100-n

mp

art

icle

sP

erm

eabil

ity:

1.3

to1.5

Per

mit

tivit

y:

14

to15

Magn

etic

loss

:0.2

to0.3

2G

Hz

to18

GH

z42

Co 2

Z–gla

ssn

an

ocom

pos

ites

�100-n

mgra

ins

Per

mea

bil

ity:

2M

agn

etic

loss

:0.0

2P

erm

itti

vit

y:

7D

iele

ctri

clo

ss:

0.0

1

2G

Hz

to3

GH

z18

Sp

inel

–w

ax

nan

ocom

pos

ites

60-n

mp

art

icle

sP

erm

eabil

ity:

4to

9P

erm

itti

vit

y:

3to

8M

agn

etic

loss

:0.2

9G

Hz

to15

GH

z15

Co 2

Zfe

rrit

es,

sin

tere

dce

ram

icfi

lms

10-l

msi

nte

red

gra

ins

Per

mea

bil

ity:

9to

10

Per

mit

tivit

y:

9to

10

100

MH

zto

400

MH

z19

Ni x

Zn

xF

e 2O

4,

spu

tter

edfe

rrit

efi

lms

Cry

stall

ite

size

:10

nm

to15

nm

Th

ick

nes

s:1.5

lmP

erm

eabil

ity:

71

GH

z28

Ori

ente

dm

etal

flak

es(i

ron

)T

hic

kn

ess:

100

nm

Siz

e:5

lm

Gra

insi

ze:

13

nm

Per

mea

bil

ity:

3to

6M

agn

etic

loss

:3

2G

Hz

to3

GH

z27

Magn

etic

nan

owir

earr

ay

ap

pro

ach

(cob

alt

)C

obalt

nan

owir

es50-n

mp

ores

90-n

min

terp

ore

dis

tan

ce

Per

mea

bil

ity:

3.5

Magn

etic

loss

:0.0

45

4.5

GH

z40

Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas 1099

Page 4: Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT

composites with crystallographically oriented cobaltof high magnetocrystalline field anisotropy showedpermeability of 3.5 and loss of 0.045 up to4.5 GHz.40,41 A brief summary of the microwaveproperties of magnetodielectrics is provided inTable I.

Polymer nanocomposites loaded with metalnanoparticles also show enhancement in permittiv-ity with higher metal-filler content. The additionalpolarization, which is strongly frequency depen-dent, occurs because of charge redistribution atmetal–polymer interfaces that creates electricdipoles. Permittivities of �10 are typically seen inmetal–polymer nanocomposites in the 1 GHz to5 GHz range with oxide-passivated nanoscaleparticles.42 Several models have been proposed inthe literature to explain the dielectric properties ofmetal–polymer nanocomposites.43–45 The modelssuggest that the particle conductivity, size, andpermittivity of the medium surrounding the nano-particles influence the dielectric relaxation fre-quency. Beyond the relaxation frequency, thepermittivity of the nanocomposite approaches thatof the matrix.

Although several reports are available on themicrowave properties of metal nanocomposites,33–39

integration of magnetic nanocomposites as thin(20 lm to 100 lm) films on an organic substrate forlow-cost microwave applications, and their charac-terization by probing planar inductive and capaci-tive structures to study magnetic and dielectricproperties simultaneously, have not been reported.Such integration using standard package fabrica-tion technologies and high-frequency characteriza-tion of magnetic polymer nanocomposite films arecritical to understand their applicability for low-costorganic packaging. This paper thus investigates theprocessing and properties of novel magnetic nano-composites for their magnetic permeability, dielec-tric constant, and dielectric loss up to 2 GHz. Basedon these measurements, the suitability of thesematerials for high-frequency antenna applicationsis assessed.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Commercially available cobalt nanoparticles(Strem Chemicals, Inc., Newburyport, MA, USA),synthesized by carbonyl decomposition and passiv-ated with a layer of sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate(AOT) surfactant to protect the surfaces, were used.The AOT coating, in conjunction with the nativeoxide, prevents oxidation during initial handling.

Polymer Matrix Selection

Epoxieswereusedas thepolymermatricesonorganicsubstrates because of their process compatibility withstandard package fabrication. AOT-coated 5-nm cobaltnanoparticles were directly mixed and milled with themonomer solution. The oxide-passivated cobalt nano-particles, on the other hand, were first milled in a

solvent (propylene glycol methyl ether acetate,PGMEA; CAS no. 108-65-6) medium. This processresults in the disintegration of aggregates to obtainfinely dispersed spherical Co nanopowder in PGMEA.Epoxy resin (EPON828�; Momentive PerformanceMaterials, USA) was added to this suspension andagain milled for 6 h, followed by addition of curingagent (EPIKURE 3300; Momentive PerformanceMaterials, USA) and final mixing for 2 h.

Scanning electron micrography (SEM) images forthe two nanocomposite systems are shown inFig. 1a, b. The nanocomposite with 5-nm particlesshowed well-dispersed particles, while the othersystem with 25-nm nanoparticles showed largerfeatures of 100 nm, indicating some particle aggre-gation. To fabricate the toroid test structures, driedmetal–polymer composite was crushed and dry-pressed in a steel mold, followed by curing thepolymer. Magnetization (B)–field (H) loops wereobtained by using a vibrating-sample magnetometer(VSM, 736 series; Lakeshore). Measurements up to500 MHz were performed using an impedance ana-lyzer (4291B; Agilent).

Fabrication of Thin-Film CharacterizationTest Structures

To fabricate thin-film structures by screen-printing,the suspension was converted to a high-viscosity paste

Fig. 1. SEM images of (a) 5-nm and (b) 25-nm Co–epoxy nano-composites.

Raj, Sharma, Reddy, Altunyurt, Swaminathan, Tummala, and Nair1100

Page 5: Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT

by heating it in a nitrogen-flow oven to slowly evapo-rate the solvent. Cu-cladded FR-4 (flame-retardant)laminates were used as the substrates for fabricatingthe test structures. The laminate consisted of 18-lmcopper cladding on a glass–polymer composite, usu-ally referred to as FR-4. The polymer consists of epoxywith flame retardants and other additives to increasethe glass-transition temperature and lower the coef-ficient of thermal expansion (CTE). Traditionalprocesses that are compatible with existing infra-structure such as screen-printing, mechanical via-drilling, and wet metallization using electroplatedcopper were employed. With thicker vias and highersolid loading, screen-printing did not give good processcontrol. Hence, stencil-printing followed by mechani-cal drilling of vias (Quick Circuit 7000; T-Tech, Inc.,Norcross, GA) was used in such cases. Drill bits of0.5 mm (Megatool; Drill Technology, Ada, MI) wereutilized for drilling the vias. The top metal layer wasformed through a semiadditive process constitutingseed-layer deposition, photoresist patterning, andplating, followed by photoresist and seed-layerremoval. These process steps are described in Fig. 2.

Optical micrographs of the test vehicles withmechanically drilled vias and electroplated resona-tor test structures are shown in Fig. 3a. The struc-ture is composed of two metal layers separated by

the nanocomposite dielectric. As seen in Fig. 3b, thetop metal is framed with another metal layer, whichis shorted to the bottom metal with a series of viaswith diameter of 0.5 mm. The gap between theframing metal and the top metal is 0.1 mm, andthe width, w, of the framing metal is 0.7 mm. Theelectric wall, created by the series of vias that shortthe frame to metal, transforms the parallel-plateresonator into a box resonator, created by organicsubstrate technology. The response of the resonatorcan be measured using ground–signal–ground(GSG) air probes. The structure is excited by prob-ing it at the corners, such that the signal tip of theprobe lands on the top metal while the ground tipsland on the frame. In the case of magnetodielectricsubstrates, however, a parallel-plate resonator isuseful only in the frequency range up to the firstantiresonance in the transmission impedance response,Z12. In this frequency range, because of the inherentcapacitive behavior of the parallel-plate resonator,the impedance response is more sensitive to changesin permittivity, making it possible to characterizethe dielectric properties almost independently of themagnetic properties. Therefore, the frequency-dependent data can be extracted by starting with anapproximate value for permittivity and by fittingthe simulated Im(Z12) and Re(Z12) values to the

Fig. 2. Process flow for test-vehicle fabrication of high-frequency characterization structures.

Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas 1101

Page 6: Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT

measured values to extract the relative permittivityand dielectric loss, respectively.

Similar to the idea of using the inherently capaci-tive behavior of parallel-plate resonators to charac-terize the permittivity, structures with inductiveimpedance response can be used to characterize thepermeability. Strip inductors obtained by shorted

microstrip lines were used to measure the inductiveimpedance response. The characterization processstarts with vector network analyzer (VNA, 8720ES;Agilent) s-parameter measurements and thicknessdata, followed by curve-fitting of the simulated Z11

data to the measured Z11 (self-impedance) data. Therelative permeability and magnetic loss tangent wereused to fit the imaginary and real parts of the simu-lated data to the measured data.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The fabricated films were characterized by x-raydiffraction (XRD) analysis to confirm the presence ofthe crystallographic metal phase. Films with 25-nmparticles showed stronger face-centered cubic (FCC)cobalt phase (Fig. 4). The finer (5-nm) nanoparticlesshowed weak peaks, as suggested by the manufac-turer’s data. The low saturation magnetization (Ms)and weak peaks indicate the presence of a signifi-cant volume of cobalt oxide on the surface, althoughthese are referred to as cobalt–polymer nanocom-posites hereinafter.

The cobalt–polymer (5-nm particles) toroidsshowed stable permeability, as shown in Fig. 5.Permeability of 2.6 to 2.65 was measured in thefrequency range of 70 MHz to 500 MHz with steadyloss of 0.03 to 0.04. Nanocomposites with 25-nmparticles showed permeability of 2.15 to 2.25 in thesame frequency range. However, the magnetic losssystematically increased from 0.01 to 0.02, althoughstill being less than the dielectric loss of traditionalepoxies. The B–H curves obtained from VSM mea-surements are shown in Fig. 6. The Ms for thenanocomposites with 25-nm nanoparticles was60 emu/g, while that for the 5-nm nanocompositeswas 25.2 emu/g. In spite of having the same metalcontent, the Ms is different because of the higheroxide fraction for the finer nanoparticles. The key

(a)

(b)Fig. 3. (a) Optical micrographs of the fabricated test structures:mechanically drilled vias (left), and plated capacitive and inductiveresonator structures (right). (b) Schematic test structures with GSGprobe locations for exciting the capacitive and inductive resonators;white circles indicate via positions.

Fig. 4. XRD patterns from the two nanocomposite systems in this study. The 5-nm cobalt nanocomposite films are deposited on copper-cladlaminates.

Raj, Sharma, Reddy, Altunyurt, Swaminathan, Tummala, and Nair1102

Page 7: Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT

properties are summarized in Table II. The theo-retical Ms value of cobalt is 160 emu/g. For 80 wt.%nanoparticle loading in the nanocomposites, thetheoretical Ms is 128 emu/g. This indicates that50 wt.% (for the 5-nm system) and 80 wt.% (for the25-nm system) of the nanoparticles consist of oxide.

The oxide content is also evident from x-ray photo-electron spectroscopy (XPS) studies (data not reportedhere) showing strong shoulder peaks corresponding tocobalt in the +2 and +3 oxidation states.

Both curves show high remanence (18.4 emu/gfor 25-nm particles, 5.4 emu/g for 5-nm particles)and coercivity (648 Oe for 25-nm particles, 115 Oefor 5-nm particles) compared with traditional softmagnets. When the particle size is small enough toform single domains, the coercivity of nanoparti-cles is controlled by the magnetic anisotropies andsurface effects arising from distortion in the sym-metry fields at the surface.32,46,47 The coercivity isfurther aggravated in oxide-passivated nanoparti-cles because of various surface anisotropies such asferromagnetic–antiferromagnetic exchange anisot-ropy at CoO–Co interfaces, as described by Berko-witz and Takano.48

The relatively stable permeability with 5-nmparticles is attributed to the finer size and lowercoercivity that resulted in suppressed eddy-currentand hysteresis losses. Based on the stable lossproperties, 5-nm cobalt nanoparticles were chosenfor high-frequency characterization. The inductorand parallel-plate resonators were modeled in Son-net with the test-vehicle electrode and dielectricgeometries in order to accurately model the losses.Characterization was performed up to 2 GHz,beyond which the resonance frequency of theinductor affects the measurements. Characteriza-tion of high-frequency magnetic properties wasperformed by matching the simulated impedancedata from Sonnet to the measured impedance dataat every frequency point to within 1% accuracy.Sensitivity analysis showed that the permittivity,permeability, and loss tangents converge to �1% forthis level of impedance matching. The characterizedvalues for the relative permeability and magnetic losstangent are shown in Fig. 7a. The cobalt–polymernanocomposite with 5-nm Co particle size showeda lr of 1.95 ± 0.05. Similarly, Fig. 7b shows theextracted values for the relative permittivity anddielectric loss tangent. As seen in this figure, therelative permittivity is constant at 7.4 ± 0.2 and the

(a)

(b)Fig. 5. Permeability versus frequency plots of cobalt–polymer nano-composites: (a) 5-nm particles and (b) 25-nm to 50-nm particles.

(a) (b)Fig. 6. B–H curves for the 5-nm and 25-nm cobalt–polymer nanocomposites from VSM measurements. Panel (b) is a zoomed version of (a).

Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas 1103

Page 8: Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT

dielectric loss increases with frequency. The devia-tion from one sample to another was within 5% andwas attributed to local thickness nonuniformitywithin the device from the paste-printing process.In one-port measurements with inductive resonatorstructures, network analyzer probes add significantparasitics. Hence, the magnetic loss tangent isexpected to have an additional source of error.

High permeability in magnetic nanocompositesusually results from superexchange couplingbetween nanoparticles. The relatively lowerpermeability values in the current nanocompositesindicate that such interparticle interactions areweak because of the increased separation betweenthe particles from the relatively lower metal particleloading in the polymer matrix and their packingT

ab

leII

.M

ag

neti

cp

ro

perti

es

of

the

na

no

co

mp

osi

tes

Co

ba

lt–P

oly

mer

Na

no

co

mp

osi

teE

stim

ate

dM

s(e

mu

/g)

Mea

sured

Ms

(em

u/g

)C

oerciv

ity

(Oe)

Rem

an

en

ce

(em

u/g

)P

erm

ea

bil

ity

Ma

gn

eti

cL

oss

5n

m128

25.2

115

5.4

2.5

–2.5

50.0

3–0.0

425

nm

128

60

648

18.4

2.1

5–2.2

50.0

1–0.0

2

(a)

(b)Fig. 7. Relative permeability (a) and permittivity (b), and the corre-sponding loss tangents, as a function of frequency for the 5-nmcobalt–polymer nanocomposites.

Raj, Sharma, Reddy, Altunyurt, Swaminathan, Tummala, and Nair1104

Page 9: Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT

density. The processing steps such as ball-millingand curing during polymer composite processingresult in significant oxide growth, which suppressesinterparticle exchange coupling. The isolated parti-cles retain substantial demagnetization, high coer-civity from the metal-oxide exchange anisotropy,48

and poor interparticle coupling. The high losses of0.1 at 1 GHz to 2 GHz are attributed to the highcoercivity from the single-domain particles com-bined with surface and interface effects, size andstructural inhomogeneities that cause broad ferro-magnetic resonance.49–51 These are frequentlyreferred to as extrinsic damping mechanisms. Withfurther optimization of the synthesis and processingto reduce the oxide shell thickness and increase theparticle loading in the polymer and packing density,these problems could be addressed, leading tohigher permeabilities and suppressed losses.

The high dielectric losses from dipole relaxationat 1 GHz to 5 GHz are also of concern with metalnanoparticle–polymer composites. The strategiesfor lowering this loss are not well understood,though literature indicates that the relaxation fre-quency can be shifted away from the operation fre-quency by varying the particle conductivity, size,and core–shell structures.45

Metal nanoparticles dispersed in the epoxy matrixthus show twofold enhancement in permittivity andpermeability compared with traditional polymerdielectrics. This results in �twofold reductions inantenna size. The losses are comparable to those oflow-loss epoxies in the very high-frequency (VHF)and ultrahigh-frequency (UHF) range (�0.02,100 MHz to 500 MHz), making them attractive forapplications in this frequency range. A permeabilityof 2.5 and permittivity of 7.5 with a low magnetic lossof 0.02 in the VHF and UHF frequency range enablesignificant antenna size reduction with higherbandwidth than traditional RF dielectrics. Theseproperties are superior to other metal nanocompos-ites27 and ferrites19,28 reported in the literature till0.5 GHz. However, hexaferrites18 and certain nano-scale anisotropic metal nanocomposite struc-tures38,40 are reported to have higher permeabilityand improved frequency stability above 1 GHz com-pared with the nanocomposites studied here. Thedegradation of properties in the current nanocom-posites is attributed to the demagnetization and fer-romagnetic resonance (FMR) broadening in theoxide-passivated nanoparticles. With further reduc-tion in the oxide shell thickness and improved nano-particle packing, higher permeability and lowerlosses can be retained at GHz frequencies. This willmake them more suitable for a broader set ofapplications.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper describes a metal–polymer nanocom-posite dielectric approach for high-frequency RFapplications. The frequency-dependent magnetic

properties were extracted by using an impedanceanalyzer. The metal nanocomposite structureshowed both high permittivity and permeability andlow losses in the VHF and UHF frequency range.

The GHz frequency-dependent material charac-teristics of the magnetodielectric films wereextracted from corner-probing of parallel-plate res-onators and strip inductors. Permeability of �2 andpermittivity of �7.4 above 1 GHz frequency weredemonstrated with the thin-film approach. Thougheddy-current losses are suppressed in these sys-tems, the high coercivity and resonance dampinglead to high losses above 1 GHz. With furtherreduction in loss, the magnetic nanomaterialsdescribed herein could be applied to antenna andother RF components, leading to significant minia-turization and performance enhancement.

A process to integrate nanoscale metal compositesat high loading onto organic substrates as thin-filmbuild-up layers using standard packaging technolo-gies such as screen-printing, mechanical via-drilling,and electroplating has also been demonstrated.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors wish to thank Intel Corporation forsupporting this work.

REFERENCES

1. P.M. Raj, H. Sharma, D. Mishra, K.P. Murali, K. Han, M.Swaminathan, and R. Tummala, IEEE Nanotechnol. Mag. 6,18 (2012).

2. M. Swaminathan, V. Sundaram, J. Papapolymerou, and P.Markondeya Raj, IEEE Microw. Mag. 12, 62 (2011).

3. G.-M. Yang, X. Xing, A. Daigle, M. Liu, O. Obi, J.W. Wang,K. Naishadham, and N.X. Sun, IEEE Trans. Magn. 44, 3091(2008).

4. L.J. Martin, S. Ooi, D. Staiculescu, M.D. Hill, C.P. Wong,and M.M. Tentzeris, IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf.Technol. 32, 849 (2009).

5. N. Altunyurt, M. Swaminathan, P.M. Raj, and V. Nair,Proceedings of the 59th Electronic Components and Tech-nology Conference, vol. 801 (2009).

6. O. Dernovsek, A. Naeini, G. Preu, W. Wersing, M. Eberstein,and W.A. Schiller, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 21, 1693 (2001).

7. S. Ghosh, A. Hilgers, T. Schlenker, and R. Porath, J. Eur.Ceram. Soc. 21, 2621 (2001).

8. N. Altunyurt, R. Rieske, M. Swaminathan, and V. Sundaram,IEEE Trans. Adv. Packag. 32, 797 (2009).

9. G. Dejean, R. Bairavasubramanian, D. Thompson, G.E.Ponchak, M.M. Tentzeris, and J. Papapolymerou, IEEEAntennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 4, 22 (2005).

10. H. Mossallaei and K. Sarabandi, IEEE Trans. AntennasPropag. 52, 1558 (2004).

11. Y. Liu, Y. Wang, and R. Yang, Proceedings of the 6thInternational Symposium on Antennas, Propagation andEM Theory, 2003, vol. 116 (2003).

12. K. Buell, H. Mosallaei, and K. Sarabandi, IEEE Trans.Antennas Propag. 54, 135 (2006).

13. P.B.A. Fechine, A. Tavora, L.C. Kretly, A.F.L. Almeida,M.R.P. Santos, F.N.A. Freire, and A.S.B. Sombra,J. Electron. Mater. 35, 1848 (2006).

14. R.E. Collin, Foundations for Microwave Engineering, 2nded. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1992), p. 450.

15. H. Bayrakdar, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 323, 1882 (2011).16. K.N. Rozanov, Z.W. Li, L.F. Chen, and M.Y. Koledintseva,

J. Appl. Phys. 97, 013905 (2005).

Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas 1105

Page 10: Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized ... · Cobalt–Polymer Nanocomposite Dielectrics for Miniaturized Antennas P. MARKONDEYA RAJ,1,3 HIMANI SHARMA,1 G. PRASHANT

17. L. Yang, L.J. Martin, D. Staiculescu, C.P. Wong, and M.M.Tentzeris, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 56, 3223 (2008).

18. J. Lee, Y.-K. Hong, S. Bae, J. Jalli, and G.S. Abo, J. Appl.Phys. 109, 07E530 (2011).

19. S. Bae, Y.K. Hong, J.J. Lee, J. Jalli, G.S. Abo, A. Lyle, I.T.Nam, W.M. Seong, J.S. Kum, and S.H. Park, IEEE Trans.Magn. 45, 2557 (2009).

20. F. Mazaleyrat and L.K. Varga, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 215–216, 253 (2000).

21. S.B. Liao, Ferromagnetic Physics (Beijing: Science Press,1992), p. 11.

22. P. Gramatyka, R. Nowosielski, P. Sakiewicz, and J. Achiev,Mater. Manuf. Eng. 20, 115 (2007).

23. R. Nowosielski and J. Achiev, Mater. Manuf. Eng. 24, 68(2007).

24. A.H. Taghvaei, H. Shokrollahi, and K. Janghorban, Mater.Des. 31, 142 (2010).

25. A.H. Taghvaei, H. Shokrollahi, A. Ebrahimi, and K.Janghorban, Mater. Chem. Phys. 116, 247 (2009).

26. Y. Shirakata, N. Hidaka, M. Ishitsuka, A. Teramoto, and T.Ohmi, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 9 (2008).

27. W. Yang, L. Qiao, J. Wei, Z. Zhang, T. Wang, and F. Li,J. Appl. Phys. 107, 033913 (2010).

28. D. Guo, Z. Zhang, M. Lin, X. Fan, G. Chai, Y. Xu, and D.Xue, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 42, 125006 (2009).

29. Y. Hayakawa, A. Makino, H. Fujimori, and A. Inoue, Jpn. J.Appl. Phys. 81, 8 (1997).

30. S. Ohnuma, H. Fujimori, T. Masumoto, X.Y. Xiong, D.H.Ping, and K. Hono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 946 (2003).

31. G. Herzer, IEEE Trans. Magn. 26, 1397 (1990).32. G. Herzer, Scripta Metall. Mater. 33, 1741 (1995).33. Y. Zhao, C. Ni, D. Kruczynski, X. Zhang, and J.Q. Xiao,

J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 3691 (2004).34. S. Ge, D. Yao, M. Yamaguchi, X. Yamg, H. Zuo, T.

Ishii, D. Zhou, and F. Li, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 40, 3660 (2007).

35. N. Tang, W. Zhong, X. Wu, H. Jiang, W. Liu, and Y. Du,Mater. Lett. 59, 1723 (2005).

36. X. Ma, Y. Zhang, S. Ge, D. Zhang, D. Yan, and D. T. Xiao,US Patent, 7,485,366 B2 (2009).

37. K. Peng, L. Zhou, A. Hu, Y. Tang, and D. Li, Mater. Chem.Phys. 111, 34 (2008).

38. W. Liu, W. Zhong, H. Jiang, N. Tang, X. Wu, and Y. Du,Surf. Coat. Technol. 200, 5170 (2006).

39. Y.D. Zhang, S.H. Wang, D.T. Xiao, J.I. Budnick, and W.A.Hines, IEEE Trans. Magn. 37, 2275 (2001).

40. X. Kou, X. Fan, H. Zhu, R. Cao, and J.Q. Xiao, IEEE Trans.Magn. 46, 1143 (2010).

41. M. Darques, J. Spiegel, J. DelaTorr Medinaa, I.Huynen, and L. Piraux, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 321, 2055(2009).

42. B. Lu, X.L. Dong, H. Huang, X.F. Zhang, X.G. Zhu, J.P. Lei,and J.P. Sun, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 1106 (2008).

43. A. Bonincontro, C. Cametti, and A. Di Biasio, J. Phys. DAppl. Phys. 13, 1529 (1980).

44. G.M. Tsangaris, G.C. Psarras, and N. Kouloumbi, Mater.Sci. Technol. 12, 533 (1996).

45. I.J. Youngs, N. Bowler, K.P. Lymer, and S. Hussain,J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 38, 188 (2005).

46. J.P. Chen, C.M. Sorensen, K.J. Klabunde, and G.C.Hadjipanayis, Phys. Rev. B 51, 11527 (1995).

47. V.B. Bregar, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 1679 (2004).48. A.E. Berkowitz and K. Takano, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.

200–201, 552 (1999).49. V. Castel, J.B. Youssef, and C. Brosseau, J. Nanomater.

Article ID 27437 (2007).50. R. Perzynski and Y.L. Raikher, Surface Effects in Magnetic

Nanoparticles, ed. D.A. Fiorani (Ottawa: NanostructuredScience and Technology Series, 2005), p. 180.

51. Y.A. Koksharov, Magnetic Nanoparticles, ed. S.P. Gubin(Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2009), p. 231.

Raj, Sharma, Reddy, Altunyurt, Swaminathan, Tummala, and Nair1106