CO2 geological storage in saline formations Auli Niemi Uppsala University
description
Transcript of CO2 geological storage in saline formations Auli Niemi Uppsala University
CO2 geological storage in saline formations
Auli NiemiUppsala University
Department of Earth Sciences
Hydrologidagarna 20142014-03-18
Stockhoms Universitet
Outline
• What is CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage)
• Key processes
• Key issues and challenges
• Ongoing research projects at Uppsala University
Principle of CO2 storage in saline aquifer
CO2 >
800
m
Several kilometers
Supercritical CO2Brine
A sufficiently impermeable seal (cap rock)
A sufficiently permeable reservoir rock
Estimate of role of CCS in reducing atmospheric CO2
Source: IEA
Options for Geological Storage
IPCC, 2005
• deep saline aquifers• depleted oil and gas fields• unmineable coal seams • other options (e.g. basalts)
Depleted oil/gas fields: - Well understood, lot of data, EOR possibility, proven capability to hold hydrocarbons- Extensively drilled (leaks?), not sufficient volumetric capacityDeep saline formations- Largest overall capacity- Less previous data, not as well demonstrated (sealing capacity)
Global distribution of CO2 sources
IEA GHG, 2002
Distribution of sources by sector
Geographic distribution of large stationary sources
Distribution of CO2 sources in Sweden/Baltic
Geographic distribution of large stationary sources
Distribution of sources by sector
Prospective areas in sedimentary basins world-wide (IPCC, 2005).
Prospective areas in sedimentary basins in Swedish territory (after Henkel et al, Erlström et al, 2011)
Potential areas for storage
How is CO2 stored in the deep aquifer?
How is CO2 stored in the deep aquifer?
CO2
CO2 gets physically trapped beneath the sealing cap-rock and low permeability layers
How is CO2 stored in the deep aquifer?
CO2 gets trapped as immobile isolated residual ’blobs’ in the pore space
CO2
CO2 gets physically trapped beneath the sealing cap-rock and low permeability layers
How is CO2 stored in the deep aquifer?
CO2 gets trapped as immobile isolated residual ’blobs’ in the pore space
CO2 CO2 gets physically trapped beneath the sealing cap-rock and low permeability layers
CO2 dissolves into water
How is CO2 stored in the deep aquifer?
CO2 gets trapped as immobile isolated residual ’blobs’ in the pore space
CO2 CO2 gets physically trapped beneath the sealing cap-rock and low permeability layers
CO2 dissolves into water
CO2 converts into solid minerals
GCCSI identified (mostly planned) large scale projects
Sleipner (North Sea) project
• longest running environmentally motivated CCS project • operating since 1996• Ideal storage reservoir (uniform, thick, extensive, high porosity, high permeability reservoir layer, thick seal of shale
T. Torp, 2011
Seismic monitoring to observe the plume at Sleipner
Myer, 2012
Computer modeling matches the observed plume behavior - Sleipner
Weyburn (Canada) project
• EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery) purposes
• largest amount stored so far• seismic monitoring has been succesful here too
In Salah (Alger)
• Gas field, injection since 2004, stored 2.5 Million Ton
• Application of seismic monitoring challenging
• InSar maps of surface deformation together with geomechanical modeling key to understanding CO2 migration
EU roadmap to CCS implementation
Technical Non-technical
• Financial uncertainty
• Regulatory uncertainty
• Public acceptance
• Infrastructure
Key challenges
• Storage capacity
• Cost - primarily capture
• Possible environmental risks
- leakage
- brine migration and pressure increase
- mechanical integrity, induced seismicity
• Extensive participation to EU R&D projects
• Studies in Sweden;
- two pre-feasibility studies during 2012-2013
financed by Energimyndigheten (SwedstoreCO2 and Bastor)
CCS work at Uppsala University
Our Ongoing EU R&D projects
MUSTANG – large-scale integrating project for quantifying Saline Aquifers for CO2 Geological Storage (2009-2014)-Coordinator
Panacea – project focusing on long term effects of CO2 Geological Storage (2012-2014)- WP leader (led by EWRE, Israel)
TRUST – project continuing and expanding the field experiment of MUSTANG (Nov. 2012-Nov 2017)- WP leader (led by EWRE, Israel)
CO2QUEST – project focusing on effect of impurities of CO2 stream (March 2013- Feb 2016)- WP leader (led by UCL, England)
Test sites
• MUSTANG (www.co2mustang.eu)
• Develop methodology and understanding for the quantification of saline aquifers for CO2
geological storage
• Large scale integrating project, 19 partners, 24 affiliated organizatons
• 7 test sites includingone deep injection experiment and one shallow injection experiment of CO2, as well as strong laboratory experiment, process
understanding and modeling components
Uppsala led large EU R&DProject - MUSTANG
MUSTANG PARTNERS
MUSTANG SIRAB
Understranding the site properties
Contributing: UU, SGU, UNOTT, CSIC, LIAG, UGÖTT,GII, IIT, EWRE, UB, CNRS, UEDIN
Example – South Scania Site Sweden
Contributing: UU, SGU
Improving the field testing methods
Interface-specific tracers
Geophysical methodsCO2 Injection-monitoring –sampling system
Contributing: UU, UGÖTT,GII, EWRE, CNRS, Imageau, Solexperts, Vibrometric, CSIC
Reservoir rock samples
Caprock samples
Reservoir properties
Fractured caprockalteration
Initial state
Claystone
20m1mm
Laboratory Experiments - Synopsis
Percolation bench
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40980
990
1000
1010
1020
60°C
50°C
40°C
30°C20°C12°C
De
nsity
/ kg
m-3
Pressure / MPa0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
980
990
1000
1010
1020
60°C
50°C
40°C
30°C20°C12°C
De
nsity
/ kg
m-3
Pressure / MPa
Brine-CO2 mixture properties
Laboratory Experiments
Contributing: CNRS, UGÖTT, KIT, UEDIN, UU
Example -
– Saturation
– Porosity after calcite dissolution
CaCO3(s) + H+ = Ca2+ + HCO3−
CO2(aq) = CO2(g)
H+ + HCO3− = H2O + CO2(aq)
NaCl(s) = Na+ + Cl−
HCO3− = H+ + CO3
2-
H2O = H+ + OH−
Saaltnik et al, 2012
Improving simulation models
Heletz deep CO2 injection experiment
Scientifically motivated CO2 injection experiment of scCO2 injection to a reservoir layer at 1600 m depth, with sophisticated monitoring and sampling
CO2 injection experiment
Objectives• To gain understanding and develop methods to determine the two key trapping mechanisms of CO2 (residual trapping and dissolution trapping) at field scale, impact of heterogeneity• Validation of predictive models,measurement and monitoring techniques wells for field
experiments
injection-withdrawal of scCO2 and brine
zone of residual trapped scCO2
1. 2.
Determine in-situ residual and dissolution trapping parameters
Reduced influence of formation heterogeneity
scCO2, brine & tracers
sc CO2
push-pull dipole
Heterogeneity affects migration and trapping
Hydraulic tests Thermal tests Tracer tests
residual trapping
residual trapping
residual & dissolution trapping, (& interfacial area)
Our Ongoing EU R&D projects
MUSTANG – large-scale integrating project for quantifying Saline Aquifers for CO2 Geological Storage (2009-2014)-http://www.co2mustang.eu (Uppsala coordinator, closing meeting in Uppsala May 26-27, 2014)
Panacea – project focusing on long term effects of CO2 Geological Storage (2012-2014)-http://panacea-co2.org/
TRUST – project continuing and expanding the field experiment of MUSTANG (Nov. 2012-Nov 2017)-http://trust-co2.org/
CO2QUEST – project focusing on effect of impurities of CO2 stream (March 2013- Feb 2016)-http://www.co2quest.eu/
Hontomin
Heletz
Partners: EWRE, Uppsala, Göttingen Univ, CSIC, CNRS, Edinburgh Univ., Cambridge Univ, Technion, Statoil, Nottingham Univ, Imageau (Nat Res Can, CO2CRC, LBNL)
Panacea - long-term effects of CO2
Possibilities to store CO2 in Sweden/Baltic
•two feasibility studies 2012-2013, financed by the Swedish Energy Authority
•SwedeStoreCO2; to look at possibilities for a pilot scale injection experiment in the Swedish territory
•BASTOR; to look at possibilities to store CO2 in the Baltic Sea - so far financing by Finland and Sweden
Contact person: C.Juhlin Uppsala University
Bastor project: objective to look at the storage capacity in the Baltic sea as a whole
Led by Elforsk/Panaware
(contact person: P-A Nilsson)
Baltic Sea formations
SLR report, 2013, to be released by Energymyndigheten
Estimated porosity and permeability – Dalders monocline
Example simulation results; southern part of Dalders monocline
Thank you for your attention!