CNMI vs USA Motion to Dismisss, Files 19-1
-
Upload
evergreencnmi -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of CNMI vs USA Motion to Dismisss, Files 19-1
-
8/14/2019 CNMI vs USA Motion to Dismisss, Files 19-1
1/4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
____________________________________
)
COMMONWEALTH OF THE )
NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, ))
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) 08-CV-01572 (PLF)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. )
)
Defendants. )
____________________________________)
DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
Defendants, the United States of America; Michael Chertoff, Secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS); DHS; Elaine Chao, Secretary of the Department of Labor
(DOL); and DOL (collectively United States), submit the following memorandum in support
of their motion, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), to dismiss the
Complaint filed by the Plaintiff, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI or
the Commonwealth).
The CNMI, an unincorporated territory of the United States, requests that this Court
declare that Title VII of the Consolidated Natural Resources Act, Pub. L. No. 110-229, Title VII,
Subtitle A, 122 Stat. 754, 853 (2008) (CNRA), violates the terms of the relationship agreement
between the parties, entitled Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands in Political Union with the United States of America, Pub. L. No. 94-241, 90 Stat. 263
(1976), as amended (Covenant). The CNRA applies the Immigration and Nationality Act and
other U.S. immigration laws to the CNMI beginning, at the earliest, in June 2009.
Case 1:08-cv-01572-PLF Document 19 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 4
-
8/14/2019 CNMI vs USA Motion to Dismisss, Files 19-1
2/4
2
The action should be dismissed for four reasons: (1) the CNMI lacks standing to bring this
action because the injuries alleged by the CNMI are not concrete and particularized but are
instead speculative and hypothetical; (2) even if the alleged harms are not speculative, the injuries
alleged are too remote for the Court to adequately address them at this time, and thus the action is
not ripe; (3) the Governor of the CNMI lacks standing to bring this action on behalf of the CNMI
because he cannot show that he has a protected procedural interest that confers standing on him
to bring this action; and (4) even if the CNMI has met its minimum constitutional standing
requirements, the action should be dismissed because the Covenant, generally permits Congress
to apply federal law to the CNMI (Covenant 105), and expressly and unambiguously permits
Congress to apply the immigration and naturalization laws of the United States to the CNMI
(Covenant 503).
A memorandum of points and authorities accompanies this motion. The memorandum
attaches Exhibits A - D. The United States notes that Exhibit B is a partial document, consisting
of 65 pages. The original document is more than 100 pages, most of which are not relevant to
this action. However, upon request, the United States will provide paper copies of it or any other
Exhibit upon request.
//
//
//
//
//
Case 1:08-cv-01572-PLF Document 19 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 2 of 4
-
8/14/2019 CNMI vs USA Motion to Dismisss, Files 19-1
3/4
3
Dated: December 15, 2008 Respectfully submitted,
GREGORY G. KATSAS
Assistant Attorney General
DAVID J. KLINEDirector, District Court Section
Office of Immigration Litigation
VICTOR M. LAWRENCE
Principal Assistant Director
By: /s/ Theodore W. Atkinson
THEODORE W. ATKINSON
SAMUEL P. GO
DEREK C. JULIUS
United States Department of JusticeCivil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation
District Court Section
P. O. Box 868 Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044
Tel: (202) 532-4135
Fax: (202) 305-7000
E-mail: [email protected]
Case 1:08-cv-01572-PLF Document 19 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 3 of 4
-
8/14/2019 CNMI vs USA Motion to Dismisss, Files 19-1
4/4
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned hereby certifies that on December 15, 2008, he served a copy of the
attached Defendants Motion to Dismiss, along with the accompanying Memorandum in Support
and Exhibits A - D, by e-mail and through the CM/ECF system, which caused the following to be
served by electronic means on the following:
David W. DeBruin
JENNER & BLOCK LLP
1099 New York Avenue, NW
Suite 900
Washington , DC 20001
Email: [email protected]
Sharmila Sohoni
JENNER & BLOCK LLP
1099 New York Avenue, NWSuite 900
Washington , DC 20001-4412
Email: [email protected]
William M. Hohengarten
JENNER & BLOCK LLP
1099 New York Avenue, NW
Suite 900
Washington , DC 20001
Email: [email protected]
Dated: December 15, 2008 /s/ Theodore W. Atkinson
THEODORE W. ATKINSON
United States Department of Justice
Case 1:08-cv-01572-PLF Document 19 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 4 of 4