CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk
Transcript of CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk
![Page 1: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Cognitive Neuroscience of Language:
13: Neglect dyslexia andperipheral dyslexias
Richard Shillcock
1
![Page 2: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
GoalsUnderstand some of the ways in which attention and impairments such as unilateral visual neglect can affect reading. Review some of the other peripheral dyslexias.
2
![Page 3: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Reading
3
Friedmann, N. & Gvion, A. (2001). Letter Position Dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 673–696.
Petrich, J.A.F., Greenwald, M.L. & Sloan Berndt, R.(2007). An investigation of attentional contributions to visual errors in right “neglect dyslexia”. Cortex, online.
Beschin, N., Basso, A. & Della Sala, S. (2000). Perceiving left and imagining right:Dissociation in neglect. Cortex, 36, 401-414.
![Page 4: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Attention
What might “attention” look like in the brain?The augmentation of “normal/default” processing, in spatial, temporal, intensity terms?
focal dividedovert covertgoal-oriented stimulus-orientedregion-based object-basedserial parallelautomatic controlledconstrained unlimited
“Attention” is used very elastically:
![Page 5: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Attention and vision
Attention is not just about eye-movements; attention can be directed covertly, to objects and regions, using cueing tasks
Attention may be better seen as task and modality specific
The simpler and more peripheral the task, the more parallel the processing seems to be; the more conscious
![Page 6: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Location- vs. object-based attention Egly, Driver & Rafal (1994)
Cueing is more effective when the target is in the same object, compared with a different objectLH damage impairs switching between objects, RH damage impairs switching between locations
![Page 7: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Different attentional systems Corbetta & Shulman (2002)
Goal directed – dorsal fronto-parietalStimulus driven – RH ventral fronto-parietal
![Page 8: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Visual attention
A parallel and a serial processEffects – or not – of set sizeEffects of the nature of the distractors
Treisman (1988, 1992)
![Page 9: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Attention and hearing
Psychologists have used the dichotic listening task to study “filtering” and the role of “higher-level processing”
A particular spoken discourse is spontaneously followed when it switches ears in a dichotic listening task
![Page 10: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Unilateral visual neglectHalligan & Marshall (1994); Kolb & Whishaw (1990)
10
![Page 11: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Neglecting internal representationsBisiach & Luzzatti (1978)
11
![Page 12: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Neglect and the hemispheres
12
![Page 13: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Contralateral projection
13
![Page 14: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Neglect dyslexia
Patients tend to ignore the left hand side of words (Ellis et al., 1987)
cage ➔ “age”; river ➔ “liver”; yellow ➔ “pillow”
Ellis et al. claim patients tend to preserve the length of the target word and preserve the letter positions
Dissociates from spatial neglect: Costello and Warrington (1987) reported a patient who neglected the left of words but the right of objects
14
![Page 15: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Neglect dyslexia
Lexical processing resembles performance in the line bisection task: very short words may be extended (Chatterjee, 1995)
15
![Page 16: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Connectionist modelling
16
![Page 17: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Visual dyslexiaReading errors throughout the word (not necessarily biased as in neglect dyslexia) (Lambon-Ralph & Ellis, 1997)
lend ➔ “land” easel ➔ “aerial”
arrangement ➔ “argument”, calm ➔ “claim”
Like neglect dyslexics (?), visual dyslexics preserve the length of the target word
Impaired letter encoding ➔ letter deletions, substitutions, etc.:
17
![Page 18: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Attentional dyslexiaPatients who can read single words but have problems identifying embedded words and letters (Shallice & Warrington, 1977):
BFXQL ➔ “F” or “Q”
Letters tend to “migrate” between words
WIN FED ➔ “fin” and “fed”
POT BIG HUT ➔ “but, big, hut”
Disruption in “perceptual grouping”?
Reflects impaired encoding of letter positions18
![Page 19: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Letter-by-letter reading(pure alexia)
‘Pure’ alexia without agraphia (Dejerine, 1890)
Patients who cannot read words but show slow sequential identification of letters in words (Patterson & Kay, 1982):
CASTLE -> "C, A, S, T, L, E ... castle"
After a word is read aloud letter by letter the patient recognizes the meaning of the word from their own spoken output
Reflects an inability to get from visual analysis to the orthographic input lexicon (word forms) 19
![Page 20: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Letter Position Dyslexia
The problem occurs in getting from visual analysis to the orthographic input lexicon (word forms)
Analogous behaviour can be induced in normals (Davis & Bowers, 2004)
20
(Friedmann & Gvion, 2001)
![Page 21: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Conclusions
A variety of reading impairments exist as a result of attentional problems
The most fully investigated – neglect dyslexia – can be characterized in terms of problems with contralaterally projected opponent processors, possibly with coarse coding in the RH
21
![Page 22: CNL 08 13 neglect dyslexia - inf.ed.ac.uk](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062519/62b2d3343fdac376126698db/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Conclusions
Connectionist models provide scope for varied patterns of impairment, but may need further (possibly anatomical) constraints
Even then, deficits are not robustly “pure”
Interaction with semantics may afford more scope for connectionist modelling
Causal argumentation needs to be subtle
22