CMB Polarization from Patchy Reionization

download CMB Polarization from Patchy Reionization

If you can't read please download the document

description

CMB Polarization from Patchy Reionization. Gil Holder. Outline. Patchy reionization CMB polarization Correlation with redshifted 21cm radiation Remote quadrupole measurements & Hubble volume 3D reconstruction. Patchy Reionization. First stars ``blow bubbles’’ in cosmic web - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of CMB Polarization from Patchy Reionization

  • CMB Polarization from Patchy ReionizationGil Holder

  • OutlinePatchy reionizationCMB polarizationCorrelation with redshifted 21cm radiationRemote quadrupole measurements & Hubble volume 3D reconstruction

  • Patchy ReionizationFirst stars ``blow bubbles in cosmic webStrongly inhomogeneousBubbles growing, becoming more numerous, range in bubble sizesFurlanetto et al

  • CMB Polarization quadrupoleanisotropy+ Thomson scattering =polarization

  • Polarization from Patchy ReionizationVery small scalesVery small signalDore et al

  • CMB Pol. & Patchy ReionizationUnlikely to be a problem for inflation B modesMainly confined to single Stokes componentDore et al

  • Thomson optical depth/21cm anti-correlationHolder, Iliev & MellemaMass densityThomson optical depth21 cm emission(slice dz~1; 100 Mpc on a side)

  • Some equations21 cm fluctuationsOptical depthOptical depth fluctuations21 cm - (optical depth) anti-correlation

  • Thomson optical depth/21cm anti-correlationHolder, Iliev & MellemaEarly times: blowing bubbles (ionize and awe)Late times: last throes of neutral overdense regions

  • The benefits of alien collaborators at z~10Surface of last scattering at z=10 has little overlap with oursMore than 1/2 of signal from dark agesGood enough data over large patch of sky allows reconstruction of initial conditions for most of Hubble volumeNeeds polarized 0.1 uK on arcminute scales and mK redshifted 21 cm

  • Comparison with Galaxy ClustersZ~9 : mean density x1000, comoving 10 Mpc=1 MpcAt z=0, this is a galaxy cluster!Remote quadrupoles with galaxy clusters suggested by Kamionkowski & LoebZ=10 has less overlap with z=0 CMBOptical depth from 21cm instead of ???No galaxy cluster in the field (radio halos, AGN, CMB lensing) SZ Image by Laurie Shaw

  • How hard is this?Need 100 nK in CMB polarization on arcminutes scales (basically 100 times the collecting area of APEX)Need few mK at wavelengths of few m (likely needs SKA)Radio point sources will be particularly nastyBig bubbles around largest sources could have 10x larger signal and detectable with current technology

  • Summary

    Fine-scale polarization measurements allow new cosmological insightsRedshifted 21cm emission well anti-correlated with CMB polarization Cross-comparison allows measurement of quadrupoles at z~10 (but signals are small)21cm gives you optical depthCMB polarization=optical depth * quadrupolemK radio signal and 100 nK CMB pol on 1 scales