CMB observations and results

26
CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 •Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us about the Universe ? A theoretical introduction. •Lecture 2: Recent successes in the mapping of CMB anisotropy: what pre-WMAP and WMAP data reveals.

description

CMB observations and results. Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta. Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us about the Universe ? A theoretical introduction . Lecture 2: Recent successes in the mapping of CMB anisotropy: what pre-WMAP and WMAP data reveals. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of CMB observations and results

Page 1: CMB observations and results

CMB observations and results

Dmitry Pogosyan

University of Alberta

Lake Louise, February, 2003

•Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us about the Universe ? A theoretical introduction.

•Lecture 2: Recent successes in the mapping of CMB anisotropy: what pre-WMAP and WMAP data reveals.

Page 2: CMB observations and results

É T=T(nê) =P

`a`mY?`m(nê)

∆T/T ~ 10-5

C` = hja2`mji

Page 3: CMB observations and results

Sachs-WolfeEffect

Acoustic Oscillations

Drag

Damping

Curvature`pk ø R ?=rs(ñ?)

Òbh2

ø eà (`=̀D)mD

Doppler

Tensors

Reionizationø eà2üc

Phenomenology of the Angular Power Spectrum

Òbh2;Òdmh2

large <-- scales --> small

Page 4: CMB observations and results

Error origins – noise and ‘cosmic variance’

Cosmic Variance ~ Cl / √fsky Noise

Page 5: CMB observations and results

Relikt, 1983 (USSR)

• First CMB anisotropy data actively used to restrict cosmological models

• Quadrupole dT/T < 4 x 10-5

• Many models where dismissed for failing this limit – hot (massive neutrino) dark matter, late

decaying neutrinos ….

Page 6: CMB observations and results

COBE-DMR, 1992 First detection of anisotropy large angular scale l < 20 growing initial slope ns=1.20.2 Low quadrupole power

Page 7: CMB observations and results

Search for the first acoustic peak:• TOCO 1998• Boomerang NAmerica, 1997

Page 8: CMB observations and results

Mapping acoustic oscillations:• Boomerang 2000-2002• Maxima 2000-2001• DASI 2001

Page 9: CMB observations and results

2002CBI – damping tailArcheops – low l link to COBEACBAR - medium-high lDASI – detection of polarization

Page 10: CMB observations and results

Pre WMAP parameters (Jan 2003)

Page 11: CMB observations and results
Page 12: CMB observations and results
Page 13: CMB observations and results

Deficiencies

• Covering only part of the sky leads to high cosmic variance uncertainties. (Noise is not an issue at l < 1000)

• Patched coverage of the angular scales enhances role of systematics (e.g., calibration and beam uncertainties) which dominates analysis.

• As the result – limited success of breaking some degeneracies c – 8 as predicted from CMB

c – ns

c – gravitational waves

Page 14: CMB observations and results
Page 15: CMB observations and results
Page 16: CMB observations and results

Wilkinson Microwave Probe (WMAP) – launch June 2001, first year data release – Feb 11, 2003

•75-85% of full sky•5 frequency channels at 23-94 Ghz• First 1year data – sky is covered twice•Each pixel observed ~3000 times. Cosmic variance limited up to l~600 •0.5% calibration uncertainty

Page 17: CMB observations and results

WMAP high S/N, high resolution CMB map of the full sky

Page 18: CMB observations and results

Joint pre-WMAPk= -0.05 0.05

b = 0.022 0.002cdm = 0.12 0.02ns = 0.95 0.04

c < 0.3-0.4

WMAPextk= -0.02 0.02

b = 0.0224 0.0009 cdm = 0.135 0.009

h = 0.71 0.04

ns = runs 1.2-0.93 c = 0.17 0.04

WMAP alonek= -0.03 0.05

b = 0.024 0.001 cdm = 0.14 0.02

h = 0.72 0.05

ns = 0.99 0.04 c= 0.15 0.07

Page 19: CMB observations and results

• Measurement of TE polarization

• Prove of adiabatic perturbation origin

(TE anticorrelation at ~ 100)

c determination from TE enhancement at l < 20.

WMAP new advances – TE: c, adiabaticity

Page 20: CMB observations and results

CMB Polarization

• Full description of radiation is by polarization matrix, not just intensity – Stockes parameters, I,Q,U,V

• Why would black-body radiation be polarized ? Well, it is not in equilibrium, it is frozen with Plankian spectrum, after last Thompson scattering, which is a polarizing process.

• But only, because there is local quadrupole anisotropy of the photon flux scattered of electron. Thus, P and dT/T are intimately related, second sources first (there is back-reaction as well).

• There is no circular polarization generated, just linear – Q,U. Level of polarization ~10% for scalar perturbations, factor of 10 less for

tensors. Thus needed measurements are at dT/T~10-6 – 10-8 level.

• As field on the sky – B, E modes (think vectors, but in application to second rank tensor), distinguished by parity.

Page 21: CMB observations and results
Page 22: CMB observations and results
Page 23: CMB observations and results

WMAP new advances – extending the parameter list

• Do we need ever precise determination of the parameters ? Yes, if we want to explore larger parameter space.,

• WMAP:– Running ns – positive slope

at low l, negative at higher l Recall COBE-DMR, it also preferred n~1.2 ! Also, low quadrupole – hint to new physics ?

– Gravitational wave (tensor) contribution to dT/T is small < 0.72 of scalar component

Page 24: CMB observations and results
Page 25: CMB observations and results

“The Seven Pillars” of the CMB(of inflationary adiabatic fluctuations)

Large Scale Anisotropies

Acoustic Peaks/Dips

Gaussianity

Polarization, TE correlation

Damping Tail

•Secondary Anisotropies

•Gravity Waves, B-type polarization pattern

Minimal Inflationary parameter set

Quintessesnce

Tensor fluc.

Broken Scale Invariance

Page 26: CMB observations and results

BOOMERANG

Cosmic Background Imager (CBI)

ACBAR