CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003...

26
CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 •Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us about the Universe ? A theoretical introduction. •Lecture 2: Recent successes in the mapping of CMB anisotropy: what pre-WMAP and WMAP data reveals.

Transcript of CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003...

CMB observations and results

Dmitry Pogosyan

University of Alberta

Lake Louise, February, 2003

•Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us about the Universe ? A theoretical introduction.

•Lecture 2: Recent successes in the mapping of CMB anisotropy: what pre-WMAP and WMAP data reveals.

É T=T(nê) =P

`a`mY?`m(nê)

∆T/T ~ 10-5

C` = hja2`mji

Sachs-WolfeEffect

Acoustic Oscillations

Drag

Damping

Curvature`pk ø R ?=rs(ñ?)

Òbh2

ø eà (`=̀D)mD

Doppler

Tensors

Reionizationø eà2üc

Phenomenology of the Angular Power Spectrum

Òbh2;Òdmh2

large <-- scales --> small

Error origins – noise and ‘cosmic variance’

Cosmic Variance ~ Cl / √fsky Noise

Relikt, 1983 (USSR)

• First CMB anisotropy data actively used to restrict cosmological models

• Quadrupole dT/T < 4 x 10-5

• Many models where dismissed for failing this limit – hot (massive neutrino) dark matter, late

decaying neutrinos ….

COBE-DMR, 1992 First detection of anisotropy large angular scale l < 20 growing initial slope ns=1.20.2 Low quadrupole power

Search for the first acoustic peak:• TOCO 1998• Boomerang NAmerica, 1997

Mapping acoustic oscillations:• Boomerang 2000-2002• Maxima 2000-2001• DASI 2001

2002CBI – damping tailArcheops – low l link to COBEACBAR - medium-high lDASI – detection of polarization

Pre WMAP parameters (Jan 2003)

Deficiencies

• Covering only part of the sky leads to high cosmic variance uncertainties. (Noise is not an issue at l < 1000)

• Patched coverage of the angular scales enhances role of systematics (e.g., calibration and beam uncertainties) which dominates analysis.

• As the result – limited success of breaking some degeneracies c – 8 as predicted from CMB

c – ns

c – gravitational waves

Wilkinson Microwave Probe (WMAP) – launch June 2001, first year data release – Feb 11, 2003

•75-85% of full sky•5 frequency channels at 23-94 Ghz• First 1year data – sky is covered twice•Each pixel observed ~3000 times. Cosmic variance limited up to l~600 •0.5% calibration uncertainty

WMAP high S/N, high resolution CMB map of the full sky

Joint pre-WMAPk= -0.05 0.05

b = 0.022 0.002cdm = 0.12 0.02ns = 0.95 0.04

c < 0.3-0.4

WMAPextk= -0.02 0.02

b = 0.0224 0.0009 cdm = 0.135 0.009

h = 0.71 0.04

ns = runs 1.2-0.93 c = 0.17 0.04

WMAP alonek= -0.03 0.05

b = 0.024 0.001 cdm = 0.14 0.02

h = 0.72 0.05

ns = 0.99 0.04 c= 0.15 0.07

• Measurement of TE polarization

• Prove of adiabatic perturbation origin

(TE anticorrelation at ~ 100)

c determination from TE enhancement at l < 20.

WMAP new advances – TE: c, adiabaticity

CMB Polarization

• Full description of radiation is by polarization matrix, not just intensity – Stockes parameters, I,Q,U,V

• Why would black-body radiation be polarized ? Well, it is not in equilibrium, it is frozen with Plankian spectrum, after last Thompson scattering, which is a polarizing process.

• But only, because there is local quadrupole anisotropy of the photon flux scattered of electron. Thus, P and dT/T are intimately related, second sources first (there is back-reaction as well).

• There is no circular polarization generated, just linear – Q,U. Level of polarization ~10% for scalar perturbations, factor of 10 less for

tensors. Thus needed measurements are at dT/T~10-6 – 10-8 level.

• As field on the sky – B, E modes (think vectors, but in application to second rank tensor), distinguished by parity.

WMAP new advances – extending the parameter list

• Do we need ever precise determination of the parameters ? Yes, if we want to explore larger parameter space.,

• WMAP:– Running ns – positive slope

at low l, negative at higher l Recall COBE-DMR, it also preferred n~1.2 ! Also, low quadrupole – hint to new physics ?

– Gravitational wave (tensor) contribution to dT/T is small < 0.72 of scalar component

“The Seven Pillars” of the CMB(of inflationary adiabatic fluctuations)

Large Scale Anisotropies

Acoustic Peaks/Dips

Gaussianity

Polarization, TE correlation

Damping Tail

•Secondary Anisotropies

•Gravity Waves, B-type polarization pattern

Minimal Inflationary parameter set

Quintessesnce

Tensor fluc.

Broken Scale Invariance

BOOMERANG

Cosmic Background Imager (CBI)

ACBAR