Clinical Integration Data Elements - CaresPPS network partners ... Cayuga Community Health Network,...
Transcript of Clinical Integration Data Elements - CaresPPS network partners ... Cayuga Community Health Network,...
Welcome and Introductions Cayuga EPAC Representatives
Liz SmithKathleen Cuddy
Cayuga County Regional Project Advisory Committee
Promote community-level collaboration via performing provider systems (PPSs) that
support the formation of Integrated Delivery
Networks…
Improve health outcomes and reduce avoidable
hospital readmissions and emergency department
utilization by…
Preserve and transform the State’s fragile health care
safety net system and prepare providers for
success in Value Based Payment…
VBP 25%
Goals of DSRIPThere are Three Primary Objectives of the DSRIP Program
IDN
• 11 DSRIP Projects with required, at-risk Milestones, Provider, and Patient Targets
1. Integrated Delivery System2. DSRIP Care Management3. ED Care Triage4. Care Transitions5. Patient Activation6. Primary Care/Behavioral Health Integration7. Crisis Stabilization8. Cardiovascular Disease Management9. Palliative Care Integration10. Behavioral Health Infrastructure11. Reduce Preterm Births
• Organizational Workstreams, some with required, at-risk Milestones and Targets
• IT/PHM/Clinical Integration• Workforce & Primary Care Plan• Cultural Competency/Health Literacy• Governance & Performance Reporting• Financial Sustainability & VBP (new)Administer a Value Based Payments Needs
Assessment to the PPS network to identify opportunities to support transition to VBP
Develop a VBP support implementation plan to address the identified needs of the PPS network partners
Develop partner engagement schedule for partners for VBP education and trainings
State-Mandated PPS Requirements
Implementation of Evidence Based Best Practices
Standardized Protocols and Procedures of
Care
Care Coordination
and Care Management
Robust Data Analytics and Data Sharing
Collaborative PPS
GovernanceStructure
Communication Across the Network
Moving to an Integrated Service Delivery ModelINTEGRATED DELIVERY OF SERVICES ARE CHARACTERIZED BY A SYSTEM OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATIONS WORKINGTOGETHER TO DRIVE GREATER VALUE AND IMPROVE CARE
PPS Projects & Organization Worksteams
PHM InfrastructureCNYCC Functions
Value Based Payment Readiness
Required Capacities to Assume Clinical and Financial Accountability Through VBP Arrangements
Performance Management
QualityImprovement
Capacity to Accept and Distribute Payment
Financial Strategy for
Possible Short Falls
Care Management
& Care Coordination
Programs
Network Management
Data Analytics
PPS Focus Areas
ContractingEntities
Scope of responsibility based primarily on treatment episodes
Scope of responsibility based on defined population of assigned or attributed patients over time
Conventional Medical Care
Reactive: Address illness of presenting patient
Proactive: Care processes also emphasize outreach based on needs, including primary and secondary prevention
Care delivered primarily by individualprofessional contributors
Care delivered by multi-disciplinary teams, including patient and informal caregivers
Volume driven reimbursement primarily based on fee-for-service
Value driven reimbursement based at least partly on acceptance of responsibility and risk and delivery of value
Population Health Management
Value Based Payment And DSRIP Success
Success in DSRIP and Value Based Payment (VBP) Programs Requires a Transition from Conventional Medical Care to Population Health Management (PHM)
Development of New Funds Flow Policy
• Board of Directors charged CNYCC with the development of a plan for the next iteration of program funding
• CNYCC hired COPE Health Solutions to support the new funds flow policy development
• Creation of a Funds Flow Work Group (FFWG) comprised of a wide-range of CNYCC partner organizations
• FFWG work directly with the CNYCC (COPE) to provide oversight and recommendations for the successful development of the PPS’s next-phase funds flow model. CNYCC Funds Flow Work Group
CNYCC Phase I Funding
Approved by CNYCC BOD in November 2015Developed a process to distribute funding for participation
Fund Allocation
Distribution of approximately
$13 million
Activity Focus
Implementation Planning Actively Engaged PatientsReporting
Background – CNYCC Funds Flow
CNYCC Phase II Funding
Currently being finalized for BOD approval (June) Development of a formulaic process to distribute funding for participation
Fund Allocation
Distribution of approximately $49
millionBridge Payment
Phase II Project Agreement
Activity Focus
Actively Engaged PatientsReporting Performance ActivityTransition to VBPBridge Payment
New – CNYCC Funds Flow Policy
Bridge Payment
• Above Target Patient Reporting – Retroactive funding provided to partner organizations that reported actively engaged patients over the identified targets ($1.5 Million)
• Performance Activity Funding – All CNYCC contracted partner organizations will be provided the opportunity to complete as many as seven performance activities to receive funding ($8.5 Million)
• A small cohort of contracted partners (approximately 40 partner organizations) will have the opportunity to participate in an additional activity focused on the implementation of the Population Health Management (PHM) system
• Flow funds to partners immediately for completed, in-process and near-term activities to advance DSRIP objectives
• Gather important information that will inform future contracting• “Bridge” the network activities from previous payment policies to upcoming Phase II contracts
Goals of the Bridge Payment:
Bridge Payment: Funding Opportunities
Proposed Allocation of CY17 Baseline Partner Share w/ Rollover
Copyright © 2017 COPE Health Solutions. All rights reserved. 14
$34M
$15M
0
$10M
$20M
$30M
$40M
$50M
$60M
CY17/FY17Baseline Rollover
$10M
$3.4M
$1.6M
InnovationFunds andProject RFPsRevenue Loss
Total Partner Share for CY17/FY17: approx. $49M
Phase II Contracting Funds
Phase II Contracting
• $34 Million Dollars to be allocated to Partner Organizations • Formula to Determine Potential Funding Possible per Individual Partner Organization• Greater Emphasis on Performance Measurement • “Bridge” the network activities from previous payment policies to upcoming Phase II contracts
Phase II Funding:
Next Steps:
• FFWG Recommendation of Phase II Funds Flow Policies• BOD Approval (June Board Meeting)• Development & Distribution of Phase II (Amended) Project Agreements• Friday Webinar – Overview of Bridge Payment and Phase II Contracting Process
Performance Activities Finalization Process Efforts
Estimated over 12 weeksdedicated to the process from
contributors
Over 15 PAWG Sessions with CNYCC to brainstorm,
iterate, revise activity language
6 Sessions with FFWG for Review and Discussion, including “Homework” reviews and revisions
3 Drafts of Performance Activities, 2 Gap
Analyses, and 1 QA
120 Final Performance
Activities Developed
Copyright © 2017 All Rights Reserved
FFWG: FundsFlow Work GroupPAWG: CNYCC PerformanceActivity Workgroup
13
• 120 Performance Activities approvedby FFWG
• 84 general Performance Activities• 36 Patient Engagement reporting
activities
• 92 activities directly linked to oneor more outcome measures
• 19 foundational activities addressall outcome measures
Copyright © 2017 All Rights Reserved
Total 120
14
Performance Activities SummaryProject # of Performance
Activities2.a.i 51
2.a.iii 72.b.iii 62.b.iv 72.d.i 143.a.ii 7
3.a.iM1 73.a.iM2 8
3.b.i 103.g.i 7
Multi Project 1Total 120
Contracting PeriodQuarter
# of PerformanceActivities
Quarter 1 24Quarter 2 21Quarter 3 43Quarter 4 32
Phase II Timeline Proposed Updates – Remediation Period
• Review outputs andconduct reasonablenesstests
Contract Input Validation Remediation Period Output Analysis Production and QA
• Produce individualized partner project agreements
• Conduct full QA processto ensure accuracy andcompleteness of eachindividual contract
• Roll out final project agreements to partners
• Revise inputs and runmodel for baseline allocations
• Produce preliminaryoutputs (without dollars) for partner remediationprocess
• QA initial outputs before distribution to partners
• 2 week data remediationperiod for service type and project selection
• Provide technical assistance to support partner decision making
• Clean up Data ValidationTools received frompartners
• Provide to CNYCC toinput into salesforce tocreate a single source oftruth
• Finalize partnercontracting list
• Run model withvalidated project andservice type selection
Today – June 30 July 5 – July 26 July 31 - August 3
BoD
Appr
oval
of fi
nala
naly
sisou
tput
s
August 11 – August 21
Copyright © 2017 All Rights Reserved
*August 10 36
10-minute break
Cayuga County Community Forum
Cayuga Community Health Network
Jessica Soule
Partner Spotlight
Listening SessionsLearning from our residents and consumers
Cayuga Community Health Network, Inc.• Rural Health Network of Cayuga County
• 501(c)3 non-profit organization
• Focus on chronic disease prevention and maintenance
• Chronic Disease Self-Management
• National Diabetes Prevention Program
Community Engagement Forums
• Implementation of patient activation activities to engage, educate, and integrate the uninsured and low/non-utilizing Medicaid populations into community-based care
CCHN proposed 2 listening sessions within Cayuga County in February
Subsidized Housing• For residents
• Thursday morning
• $10 gift cards
• Onsite at housing campus
• Questions related to expectations of care levels, barriers
Rural Community• Community leaders by
invite
• Friday over lunch
• Host Lifespan Therapies, King Ferry
• Questions focused on challenges faced by rural population
Listening Sessions’ Audiences
Forum Results• Identified themes,
ideas, suggestions, surprises
• Created report for stakeholders
• Conduct additional information gathering
• Find solutions to address issues
Population Demographics
Auburn Housing Authority
• Consists of three complexes within City of Auburn
• 326 housing units
• All subsidized housing
• 25% of residents racial minority (12% city of Auburn)
King Ferry
• Town of Genoa 1,935 people
• Very rural community
• Many diary farms (migrant workers)
• 6.7% of people don’t speak English at home
• 2% of population is Guatemalan
HealtheCNY.org
A snapshot of the economic conditions for zip code for King Ferry.
Demographics for the groupsAuburn Housing
• 11 people attended (registered)• 81% has specific health condition
– Asthma, Diabetes, High blood pressure, Depression/anxiety
• 100% had Medicaid, primary dr.• 90% taking medication• 82% smoke• 63% use public transport, 18% have a car,
9% have no transportation• 9% Native, 9% Hispanic, 9% multiracial• Barriers to keeping appt.
– Cost/co-pays– Transportation– Prior experience with dr
King Ferry
• 8 people attended (invited)
• 37% had specific health conditions– Thyroid, diabetes and hypertension
• 88% have private insurance
• 63% take medication
• 12% smoke
• 100% have vehicles
• Multiple people spoke about migrant workers in farming area
• 88% said healthcare was fairly affordable
ThemesTransportation, low health literacy, lack of respect, lack of options
Auburn Housing Authority• Lack of transportation. Most medical offices don’t ask, even
if a note is needed. Call too early, can be rejected.• Lack of respect. Many won’t accept their insurance. Many
referrals out of county but can’t get there.• This culture caused many to feel pushed aside or not valued. • Other challenges to getting quality health care include long
wait times and insufficient time with doctors, issues communicating with doctors –Providers with English as second language, doctors hard
to understand
Auburn Housing Authority continued• Doctors urge clients to make changes. People with success were given
clear directions. Overarching statements don’t work such as lose weight, stop smoking.
• Insurance coverage: Surprised to receive medical bills for procedures and lab work that they didn’t know wasn’t covered. Would have made different choices.
• Preference for healthcare sites for doctors office, urgent care or emergency department:– Urgent care sites are preferred. They see people quicker and are
nicer– ER is challenging because of long waits. It’s uncomfortable and not
clean– Would go to primary care if could get appointments when needed
• Participants provided positive feedback regarding working with insurance navigators
Quotes from Auburn• “They were snotty.” “I never saw my doctor.”
• “Being pushed aside, or not being heard.”
• “They went to college – we have to listen to them.”
• “Don’t look at us like we are stupid because you see we have Medicaid or Medicare.”
• “(Doctors) treat us like we are nothing.”
• “I have a high risk pregnancy and I can’t get an appointment for three months.”
King Ferry• Lack of public transportation. Medical
transport may not pick people up, few buses and no taxi services. Some people have to travel elsewhere to get to care, but can’t physically there.
• Copays and deductibles are a major factor in deciding when and what medical services to seek. Some reject recommended procedures and therapies based on high copays and timing related to insurance.
Town of Genoa = 1,935 people
King Ferry continued• Rural populations are aging. This leads to lack
of volunteers, attrition for those who are involved or donate their time to community efforts.
• Aging in place for residents is limited to those who can afford care. Even then, finding aides willing to come to rural is difficult and inconsistent.
• Internet and cellular service is unreliable and causes major issues. Besides issues with communication to public, and causes difficulty in employee recruitment to small community.
Quotes from King Ferry• “Transportation is a big issue for our families. We’re trying constantly to meet (that need).
There are three of us who offer transportation to the southern end of the county. That’s not enough.”
• “Six months is not acceptable to wait (for dental appointment).”
• “I would say the majority of the people we see here – if we weren’t here (in King Ferry), would not be going to physical therapy and they should. They just can’t drive to Cortland or Auburn. Transportation is an issue.”
Quotes from King Ferry• “All this effort to get people signed up for WIC is almost a waste of time because they will
never get to the appointment.”
• “If our aide can’t come, that’s it. One of us has to be home.” (Isaac has gotten so big that his mom can’t lift him.)
• Immigrants and non-English speakers “are not always welcome at other agencies.”
• “I have a mom coming in today to help her with her taxes, and I’ve been thinking all day with my fingers crossed, ‘I hope the internet works at school’ because for us, it’s hit or miss.”
Next StepsWhat to do with the results
Future Forums • Focus on aging in place, find proposed solutions to seek funding
• Gather more information regarding prediabetes/risk factors
• Referral process survey to healthcare providers
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/lifestylechangeprogramsurvey
Contact Me
Jessica Soule• Cayuga Community Health Network, Inc.
• (315) 252-4212
Management DashboardsPerformance & Outcomes Measures (Measurement Year 2, (MY2))July 2015 to June 2016
Actively Engaged Patients (Demonstration Year 3, (DY3))May 2017
Performance & Outcomes Measures (Measurement Year 2, - MY2 -)July 2015 to June 2016
Performance and Outcomes Measures – Measure SummaryCNYCC Performance Measure Summary Total
Total Measures 52
# of Measures with Data Available 24# of Measures with No Data Available 28
# of Measures on Target 10# of Measures off Target 14
# of Measures with Unknown Performance 28
# of Measures currently Pay for Reporting 39# of Measures currently Pay for Performance 13
Performance & Outcomes Measures – Goals & Results(Performance Period: July 2015 – June 2016 [Measurement Year 2])
The Performance and Outcomes Measures below apply to the following projects:
• Integrated Delivery System (2.a.i)
• DSRIP Care Management (2.a.iii)
• ED Care Triage (2.b.iii)
• Care Transitions (2.b.iv)
85.15 90.37 88.78 95.24 91.55 157.14
37.02 95.30 96.47
645.55
85.06 90.19 88.00 95.23 90.93 154.80
44.77 95.67 96.76
619.98
-
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
Adult Access toPreventative or
Ambulatory Care- 20 to 44 (%)
Adult Access toPreventative or
Ambulatory Care- 45 to 64 (%)
Adult Access toPreventative or
Ambulatory Care- 65 and older (%)
Children's accessto Primary Care -12 to 19 years (%)
Children's accessto Primary Care -25 months to 6
years (%)
PDI 90 -Composite of allmeasures (Rate
Per 100,000)
PotentiallyAvoidable ER
Vists (Rate Per100)
Children's accessto Primary Care -12 to 24 months
(%)
Children's accessto Primary Care -7 to 11 years (%)
PotentiallyAvoidable
Readmissions(Rate Per100,000)
Most Recent Data Goal
(2.34)
(0.37) (0.29)
(25.57)
Performance & Outcomes Measures – Goals & ResultsPay for Reporting Measures(Performance Period: July 2015 – June 2016 [Measurement Year 2])
On or Above GoalNot on Target to Goal – Indicates which direction and how much improvement is needed for CNYCC to meet goal
Performance & Outcomes Measures – Goals & Results(Performance Period: July 2015 – June 2016 [Measurement Year 2])
The Performance and Outcomes Measures below apply to the following projects:
• Behavioral Health/Primary Care Integration (3.a.i)
• Behavioral Health Crisis Stabilization (3.a.ii)
Performance & Outcomes Measures – Goals & ResultsPay for Reporting & Pay for Performance Measures(Performance Period: July 2015 – June 2016 [Measurement Year 2])
On or Above Goal
P4R Currently Pay for Reporting Measure
78.3
8
69.9
4 78.6
0 95.4
0
51.5
5
48.4
1
33.5
1
19.4
1
57.8
1
40.1
7
62.4
6
58.2
5
43.0
6
80.7
6
67.4
8 77.9
7
114.
21
51.0
0
49.2
1
34.8
7
21.7
4
61.5
9
43.6
0
65.7
4
61.3
4
45.9
1
-
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
CardiovascularMonitoring for
People withCardiovascular
Disease andSchizophrenia (%)
Diabetes Monitoringfor People with
Diabetes andSchizophrenia (%)
Diabetes Screeningfor People with
Schizophrenia orBipolar Disease who
are UsingAntipsychotic
Medication (%)
PotentiallyPreventable
Emergency RoomVisits (for persons
with BH diagnosis) ±(Rate Per 100)
Adherence toAntipsychotic
Medications forPeople with
Schizophrenia (%)
Antidepressant Medication
Management –Effective Acute
Phase Treatment (%)
Antidepressant Medication
Management –Effective
Continuation Phase Treatment (%)
Engagement ofAlcohol and OtherDrug Dependence
Treatment(Initiation and 2visits within 44
days) (%)
Follow-up after hospitalization for
Mental Illness –within 30 days (%)
Follow-up after hospitalization for
Mental Illness –within 7 days (%)
Follow-up care forChildren PrescribedADHD Medications -Continuation Phase
(%)
Follow-up care for Children Prescribed ADHD Medications – Initiation Phase
(%)
Initiation of Alcoholand Other Drug
DependenceTreatment (1 visit
within 14 days) (%)
Most Recent Data Goal
(.80)
(1.36)
(2.33)
(3.78)
(3.43)
(3.28) (3.09)
(2.38)
(2.85)
P4R P4R
Not on Target to Goal – Indicates which direction and how much improvement is needed for CNYCC to meet goal
Performance & Outcomes Measures – Goals & Results(Performance Period: July 2015 – June 2016 [Measurement Year 2])
The Performance and Outcomes Measures below apply to the following projects:
• Cardiovascular Disease Management (3.b.i)
Performance & Outcomes Measures – Goals & ResultsPay for Performance Measure(Performance Period: July 2015 – June 2016 [Measurement Year 2])
36.11 32.39
0
10
20
30
40
Prevention Quality Indicator # 7 (Hypertension) ±
Most Recent Data Goal
(3.72)
On or Above Goal
Not on Target to Goal – Indicates which direction and how much improvement is needed for CNYCC to meet goal
Total Available FundingDY2, Q3 and Q4 Reporting Period
Available Funding for AEP & Performance and Outcomes (Total Available Funding for DY2, Q3 and Q4 - $5,405,492.52)
Performance and Outcomes Measures
$4,617,291.73
Actively Engaged Patients (AEP) $788,200.79
Performance & Outcome Measures: Projected FundingJuly 2015 - June 2016 (Measurement Year 2)
Performance and Outcomes – Projected Funding Summary• Dollar Values reflected in the Dashboards are based on the available funds for DY2,
Quarters 3 and 4. Total available to CNYCC is $4,617,291.73
• Performance Measures are broken into 4 Tiers based on measure worth• Tier 1 – 15 Performance and Outcomes Measures worth $2,624,748.34
• Includes Potentially Avoidable Readmissions and Potentially Avoidable ER Visits Measures
• Tier 2 – 13 Performance and Outcomes Measures worth $1,204,171.27• Includes Follow-up after Hospitalization (7 & 30 Days) & Antidepressant Medication
Management
• Tier 3 – 12 Performance and Outcomes Measures worth $633,986.46• Includes Adult and Children’s Access Measures
• Tier 4 – 12 Performance and Outcomes Measures worth $154,385.66• Includes Cardiovascular Measures
Performance and Outcomes – Projected Funding Summary(Total Funding Available for DY2, Q3 and Q4 Performance Measures - $4,617,291.73)
Tier 1, $2,624,748.34
Tier 2, $1,204,171.27
Tier 3, $633,986.46Tier 4, $154,385.66
MEASURE TIERS BASED ON TOTAL FUNDING FOR ALL PROJECTS
Performance and Outcomes – Projected Funding Summary(Total Funding Available for DY2, Q3 and Q4 Tier 1 Performance Measures - $2,624,748.34)
$615,926.64
$1,390,132.73
$386,335.31
$232,353.65
Projected NOT to Receive Payment
Pay for Reporting – Guaranteed Funds
Performance Unknown – Pay for Performance
Projected to Receive Payment
Performance and Outcomes – Projected Funding Summary(Total Funding Available for DY2, Q3 and Q4 Performance Measures - $4,617,291.73)
Projected NOT to Receive Payment
Pay for Reporting – Guaranteed Funds
Performance Unknown – Pay for Performance
$232,353.65$232,353.65
$205,309.00$169,260.53$169,260.53$169,260.53$169,260.53$169,260.53$169,260.53$169,260.53
$153,981.66$153,981.66$153,981.66$153,981.66$153,981.66
$0.00 $50,000.00 $100,000.00 $150,000.00 $200,000.00 $250,000.00
Prevention Quality Indicator # 7 (Hypertension) ±Prevention Quality Indicator # 8 (Heart Failure) ±
Screening for Clinical Depression and follow-upPQI 90 - Composite of all Measures
Potentially Avoidable ReadmissionsCare Coordination (Q13, 17 and 20)
Getting Timely Appointments, Care and Information (Q6, Q8 and Q10)HCAHPS - Care Transistion Metrics (Q23 to Q25)
Potentially Avoidable ER VistsPDI 90 - Composite of all measures
Diabetes Screening for People with Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disease who…Potentially Preventable Emergency Room Visits (for persons with BH…
Cardiovascular Monitoring for People with Cardiovascular Disease and…Diabetes Monitoring for People with Diabetes and Schizophrenia
Adherence to Antipsychotic Medications for People with Schizophrenia
Tier 1 Measure Payments (Total $2,624,748.34)
Projected to Receive Payment
Actively Engaged PatientsMay 2017 (Demonstration Year 3)
Actively Engaged Patients: May 1 – May 31, 2017
58
ProjectDY3Q2 Target Actual
Gap to DY2Q4 Target Status
DSRIP Care Management (2aiii) 5,600 8 5,592
ED Care Triage (2biii) 7,200 1,402 5,798
Care Transitions (2biv) 2,970 180 2,790
Patient Activation (2di) 11,100 875 10,225
Primary Care/Behavioral Health Integration (3ai) 16,490 6,123 10,367
Behavioral Health Crisis Stabilization (3aii) 10,800 1,520 9,280
Cardiovascular Disease Management (3bi) 6,460 1,822 4,638
Palliative Care PCMH Integration (3gi) 1,980 1 1,979
Indicates that 80% of the Q4 target has been reached and the AV should therefore be achieved
DSRIP Care Management Actively Engaged PatientsActively Engaged Patient Contribution by Organization by Month
St. Joseph's Health Center Oneida Health Systems, Inc. Regional Primary Care NetworkApr-17 7 1
Mar-17 6
Feb-17 14
Jan-17 4 1
Dec-16 5
Nov-16 5
Oct-16 2
Sep-16 10
Aug-16 6
Jul-16 5
Jun-16 1 14
May-16 132
020406080
100120140
2aiii DSRIP Care Management - Monthly
DY Target Actual AEP / Month (*) $ At-Risk
DY3Q2 (9/17) 5,600 8 747 x 6 months $167,000
DY3Q4 (3/18) 16,700 - 1112 x 12 months $144,000Action Steps
• To increase partnership between Health Homes, down stream providers and medical entities, a finalized sample Service Agreement and Care Coordination communication work flow will be disseminated to partner organizations to assist with implementation strategies.
DSRIP Care Management Actively Engaged Patient Targets
* 80% AEP needed to meet target
ED Care Triage Actively Engaged PatientsActively Engaged Patient Contribution by Organization by Month
RomeMemorialHospital
St. ElizabethMedical Center
St. Joseph'sHealth Center
Faxton-StLuke's
Healthcare
UpstateUniversityHospital
Oneida HealthSystems, Inc.
OswegoHospital Crouse Hospital
Lewis CountyGeneralHospital
AuburnCommunity
Hospital
CommunityMemorialHospital
May-17 62 138 123 156 47 53 62 14 5 1
Apr-17 71 202 105 152 47 63 41 23 36 1
Mar-17 79 233 124 94 41 46 32 38 6 3
Feb-17 77 241 123 88 58 57 45 33 10 4 4
Jan-17 74 246 124 92 63 52 50 44 15 4 5
Dec-16 73 213 94 56 85 55 12 41 7 4
Nov-16 102 131 80 32 95 55 31 43 29 2
Oct-16 135 99 136 17 74 59 33 17 16
Sep-16 63 63 94 42 44 42 36 21 5 2
Aug-16 184 44 160 36 34 51 27 7 9
Jul-16 71 40 93 2 29 40 85 16 13
Jun-16 726 111 18 36 133 22 6
0200400600800
1,0001,2001,4001,6001,8002,000 2biii ED Care Triage - Monthly
DY Target Actual AEP / Month (*) $ At-Risk
DY3Q2 (9/17) 7,200 1,402 960 x 6 months $157,000
DY3Q4 (3/18) 14,490 - 966 x 12 months $134,000Action StepsRecent change (4/19) to expand AEP Definition by suspending the 2 day business notification of PCP or HH CM appointment. The expanded AEP Definition is:
• Had either a PCP or Health Home Care Manager appointment scheduled within 30 Days of the ED discharge date OR• A PCP or Health Home Care Manager appointment scheduled outside of the 30 Days following the ED discharge
BUT had been notified of the appointment within 30 Days of the ED discharge
ED Care Triage Actively Engaged Patients
* 80% AEP needed to meet target
Care Transitions Actively Engaged PatientsActively Engaged Patient Contribution by Organization by Month
Upstate UniversityHospital
St. Joseph's HealthCenter
St. Elizabeth MedicalCenter
Auburn CommunityHospital
Oneida HealthSystems, Inc.
Rome MemorialHospital
Faxton-St Luke'sHealthcare Oswego Hospital Lewis County General
Hospital Crouse Hospital
May-17 73 15
Apr-17 67 17 2 6
Mar-17 308 10 83 11 4 5
Feb-17 292 20 58 12 7 1
Jan-17 320 14 29 15 19 1
Dec-16 314 188 72 10 43 57 37 1 2
Nov-16 267 178 61 43 53 34 17 15 5
Oct-16 281 212 82 50 54 43 15 11 4 1
Sep-16 274 219 83 65 66 47 17 13
Aug-16 266 185 114 60 38 56 12 12 1
Jul-16 236 193 110 13 60 46 23 23 7 1
Jun-16 281 222 113 54 38 45 21 21 10 4
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
2biv Care Transitions - Monthly
DY Target Actual AEP / Month (*) $ At-Risk
DY3Q2 (9/17) 2,970 180 396 x 6 months $156,000
DY3Q4 (3/18) 5,940 - 396 x 12 months $134,000
Action Steps
• Actively Engaged Patient definition is undergoing review and revision that will include a consideration of timing based on the new DY.
Care Transitions Actively Engaged Patients
* 80% AEP needed to meet target
Patient Activation Actively Engaged PatientsActively Engaged Patient Contribution by Organization by Month
TheSalvation Army
LewisCountyGeneralHospital
OneidaHealth
Systems, Inc.
PlannedParenthood of
Mohawk
Hudson, Inc.
CatholicCharitie
s ofOnonda
gaCounty
CrouseHospital
FingerLakes
Community
Health
RescueMissionof Utica
AuburnCommu
nityHospital
ACRHealth
Faxton-St
Luke'sHealthc
are
PlannedParenthood ofCentral
andWester
n NY
CatholicCharitie
s ofOswegoCounty
St.Elizabet
hMedicalCenter
Regional
PrimaryCare
Network
NOCHSI
Resource
Centerfor
IndependentLiving
NorthCountryPrenata
lPerinat
alCouncil
LewisCountyHealthAgency
Arise,Inc.
Syracuse
Recovery
Services
HillsideChildre
n'sCenter
ElderChoice,Inc.
FingerLakes
MigrantHealthCare
ProjectInc.
Hutchings
Psychiatric
Center
UpstateUniversi
tyHospital
Northern
Regional Center
forIndepen
dentLiving
May-17 4 89 54 35 77 7 30 49 9 12 5 12 8 3 3 2 1 1
Apr-17 5 101 35 50 46 20 23 74 12 23 36 9 14 5 4 2 1 7 4 2 1
Mar-17 136 53 27 14 4 15 2 25 14 15 4 2 3 8 7 4 3 6
Feb-17 52 33 32 12 32 27 3 6 34 1 26 7 1 4 4 1 3 1
Jan-17 5 59 41 32 23 31 35 4 8 14 12 1 6 1 1
Dec-16 21 37 19 16 26 9 7 2 4 8 3 2 7
Nov-16 109 70 20 24 10 6 13 4 9 1 3 3
Oct-16 5 27 38 31 27 12 8 1 4 1 8 7
Sep-16 26 35 3 12 2 16 10 1 6 1 2
Aug-16 62 37 12 8 6 2 11 11 5 3 4
Jul-16 136 13 90 18 12 40 5 6 9 5 4 5
Jun-16 74 31 20 22 3 8 4 6 5 13
050
100150200250300350400450500
2di Patient Activation - Monthly
DY Target Actual AEP / Month (*) $ At-Risk
DY3Q2 (9/17) 11,100 875 1480 x 6 months $135,000
DY3Q4 (3/18) 22,300 - 1,487 x 12 months $116,000Action Steps• Continuing outreach to engage new organizations to partner with CNYCC to
implement project
Patient Activation Actively Engaged Patients
* 80% AEP needed to meet target
Primary Care/Behavioral Health Integration Actively Engaged PatientsActively Engaged Patient Contribution by Organization by Month
St.ElizabethMedicalCenter
St.Joseph'sHealthCenter
Faxton-StLuke's
Healthcare
NOCHSIUpstateUniversity Hospital
PlannedParentho
od ofMohawkHudson,
Inc.
SyracuseBrick
House
FamilyCare
MedicalGroup
Community
MemorialHospital
RegionalPrimary
CareNetwork
OswegoHospital
SyracuseCommunity HealthCenter,
Inc.
CrouseHospital
LibertyResource
s, Inc.
LewisCountyGeneralHospital
MohawkValley
Psychiatric Services
OneidaHealth
Systems,Inc.
UnitedCerebral
Palsy
FarnhamInc.
FingerLakes
Community Health
AuburnCommuni
tyHospital
HarborLights Arise, Inc.
May-17 915 370 528 399 113 105 214 67 80 42 8
Apr-17 796 444 569 445 175 124 97 100 186 99 46 98 76 19 8
Mar-17 491 269 179 314 148 275 226 72 39 69 39 59 51 10 9 7 18 18
Feb-17 471 210 176 315 103 249 208 92 36 92 100 46 48 22 58 12 3 16 21 15
Jan-17 577 252 197 417 164 244 205 49 42 55 132 46 41 24 68 18 7 19 25 30 2
Dec-16 439 254 170 468 235 263 164 63 38 76 51 28 19 26 28 11 16 23
Nov-16 308 316 186 530 347 275 178 59 512 59 71 23 42 8 29 14 10 24 40
Oct-16 240 378 237 321 460 153 69 71 73 75 20 42 8 13 13 38 1
Sep-16 458 283 247 322 690 315 30 48 77 3 1 7 2
Aug-16 723 474 351 249 629 213 211 62 91 134 42 15 32 26
Jul-16 14 169 315 71 513 337 196 226 18 100 179 32 27 6 28 21
Jun-16 254 265 515 14 50 183 209 415 57 115 1 52 39 8 89 38 26 25 12 1
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,0003ai Primary Care/Behavioral Health Integration - Monthly
DY Target Actual AEP x Month (*) $ At-Risk
DY3Q2 (9/17) 16,490 6,123 2,199 x 6 months $142,000
DY3Q4 (3/18) 39,865 - 2,658 x 12 months $122,000Action Steps
• Actively Engaged Patient Reporting Criteria narrows starting April 1st to align with the 3ai Standards of Care
Primary Care/Behavioral Health Integration Actively Engaged Patients
* 80% AEP needed to meet target
Behavioral Health Crisis Stabilization Actively Engaged PatientsActively Engaged Patient Contribution by Organization by Month
OnondagaCase
Management
OswegoHospital
SyracuseBrick House
LibertyResources,
Inc.
St. Joseph'sHealthCenter
Arise, Inc.
CayugaCounty
CommunityMentalHealthCenter
TheNeighborhoo
d Center,Inc.
SyracuseCommunity
HealthCenter, Inc.
Central NewYork Services
MohawkValley
PsychiatricServices
HutchingsPsychiatric
Center
NorthCountry
TransitionalLiving
Services
UpstateUniversityHospital
Unity Houseof Cayuga
County, Inc.Farnham Inc.
OswegoCounty
Opportunities
May-17 168 319 127 24 29 24 23 1 4
Apr-17 239 149 242 110 18 20 21 2
Mar-17 172 235 95 35 20 24 3 2
Feb-17 668 257 157 132 109 22 20 15 21 16
Jan-17 745 268 161 133 156 47 25 27 32 31 13 2 2 1
Dec-16 610 259 163 113 136 35 24 13 39 9 2 3
Nov-16 591 252 150 137 141 31 19 16 24 4 7 1 4 1
Oct-16 547 153 163 163 125 40 21 15 27 4 4 1 2
Sep-16 528 175 157 131 32 20 12 3 4 2
Aug-16 184 189 80 12 32 13 2 10 8 5 3 1
Jul-16 526 159 155 31 92 10 22 11 5 28 2 3 1 1
0500
1,0001,5002,0002,5003,0003,5004,0004,5005,000
3aii Behavioral Health Crisis Stabilization - Monthly
DY Target Actual AEP / Month (*) $ At-Risk
DY3Q2 (9/17) 10,800 1,520 1,440 x 6 months $135,000
DY3Q4 (3/18) 24,480 - 1,632 x 12 months $116,000
Action Steps• Convening partner-led discussion about Open Access scheduling as a strategy to
improve access to services. • Workgroup meeting to develop protocols around mobile crisis, peer respite and
warm line. • Work of the group will continue, but at the county level; exploring overlap with
the Care Transition Coalitions and other forums.
Behavioral Health Crisis Stabilization Actively Engaged Patients
* 80% AEP needed to meet target
Cardiovascular Disease Management Actively Engaged Patients Actively Engaged Patient Contribution by Organization by Month
St. ElizabethMedicalCenter
Faxton-StLuke's
Healthcare
UpstateUniversityHospital
RomeMemorialHospital
Family CareMedicalGroup
Lewis CountyGeneralHospital
SyracuseCommunity
HealthCenter, Inc.
RegionalPrimary Care
Network
CommunityMemorialHospital
NOCHSI PhysicianCare, PC
OneidaHealth
Systems, Inc.
OswegoHospital
AuburnCommunity
Hospital
St. Joseph'sHealth Center
Port CityFamily
Medicine
May-17 368 258 89 50 10 81 17 32 17 16 23
Apr-17 235 93 118 54 81 21 54 43 48 60 8 17 29
Mar-17 218 150 65 31 47 82 24 29 26 3 4 23
Feb-17 218 133 24 26 31 62 14 23 15 29 30 17 10 13
Jan-17 65 166 10 25 65 61 14 32 22 31 32 17 9
Dec-16 46 150 15 21 39 31 4 23 25 30 34 12 10 1
Nov-16 38 136 218 52 70 48 20 10 35 27 16 7
Oct-16 32 19 263 63 69 80 41 9 33 21 16 8 5
Sep-16 42 19 393 75 26 50 28 19 15 11 6
Aug-16 19 26 49 82 62 91 31 21 5 13 29 5
Jul-16 43 41 75 158 33 46 35 19 4 5 22 4
Jun-16 65 63 128 140 46 5 2 42 50 3 4 56 5
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
3bi Cardiovascular Disease Management - Monthly
DY Target Actual AEP / Month (*) $ At-Risk
DY3Q2 (9/17) 6,460 1,822 861 x 6 months $104,000
DY3Q4 (3/18) 12,730 - 849 x 12 months $89,000Action Steps• Supporting partner implementation of Standards of Care.• Working with HealtheConnections and other community partners to increase Self-Measured
Blood Pressure opportunities to improve patient blood pressure control.• Continuing work with Central New York Regional Center for Tobacco Health Systems to
support smoking cessation training, 5A’s implementation and connections with the NYS Smoker’s Quitline.
• DY3 focus on promotion of community resources and population health management particularly for high risk patients.
Cardiovascular Disease Management Actively Engaged Patients
* 80% AEP needed to meet target
Palliative Care IntegrationActively Engaged Patient Contribution by Organization by Month
St. Elizabeth Medical CenterMay-17 1Mar-17 6
5
6
6
6
6
6
7
7
7
7
3gI Palliative PCMH Integration - Monthly
DY Target Actual AEP / Month (*) $ At-Risk
DY3Q2 (9/17) 1,980 1 264 x 6 months $80,000
DY3Q4 (3/18) 3,960 - 264 x 12 months $69,000Action Steps• Exploring alignment with PCMH and working with Karen Joncas to develop a
model for delivery within practices to support implementation.• Continued outreach to partner organizations considering the Palliative Care
project to help eliminate barriers to engagement• IPOS training date and registration disseminated to all current and
prospective partners• Developing repository for IPOS for contracted partners to be able to report
Palliative Care Integration Actively Engaged Patients
* 80% AEP needed to meet target
Digital Billboard
CayugaNext Meeting:
October 5, 2017