Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

97
SYSTEMATIC CLINICAL EXAMINATION IN MAXILLOFCIAL TRAUMA Dr Arjun Shenoy

Transcript of Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Page 1: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

SYSTEMATIC CLINICAL EXAMINATION IN MAXILLOFCIAL TRAUMA

Dr Arjun Shenoy

Page 2: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Contents

• Extraoral examination

Inspection - scalp

- Ear, Eyes, Nose

- Middle third of the face

- Lower third of face

• Extraoral palpation

Page 3: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Intraoral examination.- Inspection

- Palpation

• Percussion and Auscultation

• Conclusion

• References.

Page 4: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

General examination

Nervous system• Orientation

• Memory

Respiratory system & CVS

Chest & Abdomen.

Page 5: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

FORCES

Page 6: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Biomechanics of the midface

• midface equates to a tent, where the tent poles represent the bony midface and the tarpaulin represents the overlying soft tissues.

• vectors of the midface address all three dimensions ie, vertical, sagittal, and transverse,

Page 7: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Extraoral examination

Inspection.• Face – washed with warm saline/water

• Cleaning of dried blood clots/ scabs

• Check for – presence of edema, ecchymosis, deformity, facial asymmetry.

• Bleeding areas, CSF leak.

• Associated soft tissue injury.

Page 8: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

ESSENTIALS

• Examination gloves

• Single-use tongue blades

• Examination light

• Visual chart

• Nasal speculum (in case of need for nasal examination)

Page 9: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Scalp & skull

• Lacerations & contusions.

• Depressed # of the skull

• Battle’s sign.

Ecchymosis near mastoid process

Page 10: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Eyes.

• Examine for debris / broken glass pieces

• Lacerations

• Corneal Abrasions & Scleral tears

• Circumorbital Edema & Ecchymosis

• Examine for movements of the eye in all GAZES & patency of optic & occulomotor nerve

Page 11: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Classification of eyelid lacerations

partial thickness full thickness

canalicular system canalicular system

involved not involved

Page 12: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

full thickness + inferior canalicular disruption

Page 13: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Racoon eyes.

Page 14: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Subconjunctival Ecchymosis–

• Flame shaped hemorrhage with posterior limit not seen .

( Suspect # of the orbital walls )

Page 15: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Globe position-

Simple testing of pupil axis is provided using a straight instrument.

The examiner should include an examination from above

Page 16: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

… and below to evaluate facial symmetry.

The illustration shows a posttraumatic asymmetry of globe protrusion (left enophthalmos)

Page 17: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Hertel exophthalmometer

• This instrument is only reliable to measure the sagittal globe position correctly in a side-to-side comparison.

• Note: Evaluation for enophthalmos in the acute setting is unreliable because of orbital edema or if the lateral orbital rim is not intact and displaced

Page 18: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Naugle exophthalmometer

• In case of acquired or congential asymmetry of the lateral orbital rims a Hertel exophthalmometer is misleading.

• Naugle exophthalmometer is preferred since the referring structure is not the lateral orbital rim but the frontal and infraorbital structures.

Page 19: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Pupillary reactionA light is used to assess pupillary reaction

Page 20: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• The illustration shows the optic nerve with impingement of the optic nerve at the orbital apex. There is no indirect light reaction of the unaffected right eye (Marcus Gunn pupil).

• Note: The indirect light reaction is more reliable than the direct pupillary reaction to detect posttraumatic optic nerve lesions.

Page 21: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Ear

• Lacerations of auricle, external auditory canal, tympanic membrane.

• Check for bleeding & foreign bodies

• Check for any CSF Ottorrhea

• Check for any Blood discharge

Dislocated condylar neck may # EAM

Page 22: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Examine for laceration or collapse of the external canal.

• Examine the tympanic membrane for rupture or a hemotympanum.

• Note: Blood in the ear canal may indicate skull base fractures or external auditory canal lesion resulting from a condylar fracture.

Page 23: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Note: Make sure the patient can hear with both ears

• Examine for a hematoma of the auricular cartilage. If there is a hematoma it needs to be drained and a ‘through-and-through’ bolster dressing is recommended. This is to prevent the permanent deformity of a cauliflower ear, with a possible compromise of the external canal.

Page 24: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Bolster suture are used in a ‘through-and-through’ manner to prevent reaccumulation of the hematoma

• Many different materials can be used as a bolster dressing. In this case, dental rolls have been used

Page 25: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

BATTLES SIGN

• Post Auricular Bruising

• Base of Skull Fracture

OR

• condyle impacts above into the MCF fracturing the mastoid process )

Page 26: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma
Page 27: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

FRONTO-NASOETHMOIDAL REGION

• NOE complex fractures involve the medial vertical (nasomaxillary) buttresses of the facial skeleton

Page 28: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

IN CASE OF FRACTURE IN NOE

• swelling and pain in the medial canthal area.

Page 29: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Intercanthal distance

• in Caucasians more than 35 mm intercanthal distance is considered abnormal.

• illustration demonstrates widening on the left with the medial canthus positioned lateral to the position of the lateral nasal alar margin

Page 30: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• NOE fractures are most commonly classified according to Markowitz BL, Manson PN, Sargent L, et al (1991)

• Type I• Type II• Type III

• These can be unilateral or bilateral injuries.

• Plast Reconstr Surg. 87(5):843-53:

Page 31: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Type I

• In unilateral Markowitz type I fractures, there is a single large NOE fragment bearing the medial canthal tendon.

• The nasal bone may also be involved and, in cases of comminution, may not provide adequate dorsal support to the nasal bridge.

Page 32: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Unilateral Type II

• In unilateral type II fractures, there is often comminution of the NOE area, but the canthal tendon remains attached to a fragment of bone, allowing the canthus to be stabilized with wires or a small plate on the fractured segment

Page 33: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Unilateral Type II + Involvement of the nasal bone

• The nasal bone may also be involved and, in cases of comminution, may not provide adequate dorsal support to the nasal bridge.

Page 34: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Bilateral type II fracture with nasal bone

involvement

• bone grafting of the nasal dorsum may be necessary

Page 35: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Type III

• In type III fractures, there is often comminution of the NOE area (as in type II fractures) and a detachment of the medial canthal tendon from the bone.

Page 36: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Type III + Involvement of the nasal bone

Page 37: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Bilateral type III fracture with nasal bone

involvement

Page 38: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Nose.• Uni/bilateral epistaxis.

• CSF rhinorrhea – tram line effect & halo effect

• Deviation, asymmetry of nose.

Page 39: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

CSF RHINNORHEA

• Leakage of CSF from the nose due to fractured cribriform plates of ethmoid bone , generally with Le-Fort 2 & 3 fractures

• Tram Line Effect

• Patient complains of salty taste in throat ( post nasal leak of CSF)

• Warn patient not to blow nose vigorously (traumatic aerocele) and raise head ( will increase ICP )

Page 40: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

CSF leak (clinical sign: straw-colored or clear nasal drainage)

• Tilt test with positive halo sign (as illustrated)

• CT scan with thin coronal cuts (0.5 mm) of the cribriform plate

• Comparison of the concentration of glucose between fluid and patient’s serum

• Laboratory analysis for beta-transferrin

Page 41: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Traumatic telecanthus.

- Nasal fracture

- Lefort III fracture

Saddle Nose - Depressed Nasal

Bridge due to # of the nasal bones

Traumatic Telecanthus & Mongoloid

Inclination of Palpebral Fissure.

( # of the frontal process of the

maxilla to which palpebral ligaments

are attached )

Normal Intercanthal Distance = 3 – 3.5 Cm

Page 42: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• BALLOON FACIES -Circumorbital

• Edema

• PANDA FACIES - Circumorbital

• Ecchymosis

• Vertical lengthening of the face

( downward & backward rotation of # rd maxilla )

• Sensory loss in region supplied by V2 branches

• Surgical Emphysema ( Air entering from nose leaks through fractured Maxilla/Zygoma/Naso-ethmoid regions to tissues )

Page 43: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Nasal inspection using a speculum with appropriate light (headlights are recommended) allows for examination of the nasal cavity.

• It is very important to rule out a septal hematoma, as this has to be drained to avoid an infection which can result in septal perforation. Nasal packing or splints should be inserted to prevent recurrence of hematoma.

Page 44: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

This clinical photograph shows septal hematoma.

Page 45: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Clinical photograph shows delayed drainage of septal hematoma resulting in infection. This patient did not present to the emergency room until 1 week following sustaining nasal trauma.

Page 46: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Middle third of face• Bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis, gross edema –

‘Moon face.’

• Lengthening of middle third of the face – ‘Dish face deformity.’

Page 47: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Panda facies

• Vero-1965

• Bilateral circumorbital ecchymosis

• Localized to orbicularis oculi region.

• Maximum effect- 24-48 hrs.

Page 48: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

EXAMNATION MANDIBLE • Inspect for Asymmetry and deviation • of mandible

• Lacerations

• Condylar depression( the condyle can be dislocated anterior to thearticular eminence )

• Trismus & Jaw Movements

• Palpate the symphysis , inferior Border and ramus of the mandiblefor step deformity.

• PARADE GROUND FRACTURE – Bilateral parasymphysial with Bilateral Condylar fracture.

Page 49: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Extraoral palpation

Page 50: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Fracture palpation

• The midface and frontal cranium should be palpated to detect bony irregularities, step-offs, crepitus, and sensory disturbances.

• It is crucial for decision making to ensure that one hand stabilizes the skull so that the examiner’s contralateral hand can provide movements which can be assessed.

Page 51: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Extraoral palpation

• Gentle but firm pressure.

• Depression over forehead.

• Areas of tenderness, step deformity, abnormal mobility.

Supra-orbital rim

frontozygomatic suture

Page 52: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• zygomatic butress→

• zygomatic arch →

• infra orbital rim →

• zygomaxillary suture

Page 53: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Feel for STEP DEFORMITY in bone by palpating starting from the :

Supra-orbital rim →frontozygomatic suture →zygomatic butress →zygomatic arch →infrorbital rim → zygomaxillary suture

Page 54: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Illustration shows the palpation in the region of the zygomatic complex and zygomatic arch.

Page 55: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Zygomatic Examination

• Unilateral epistaxis

• Depressed malar

prominence

• Subcutaneous

emphysema

• Orbital rim step-off

• Altered relative pupil

position

• Periorbital ecchymosis

• Subconjunctival

hemorrhage

• Infraorbital

hypoesthesia

Page 56: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

TMJ PALPATION

Page 57: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

TMJ Dislocation

Symptoms

• Patient presents with mouth open, cannot close

mouth or talk well

• Can be misdiagnosed as psychiatric or dystonic

reaction

Page 58: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Mandible

- Areas of tenderness,

step deformity.

- Abnormal mobility.

- Inferior border continuity.

- Angle of mandible.

Page 59: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Bow string test

• Fingers are used to grab the eyelid or a forceps to grab the skin in the medial canthal area and pulled laterally

• the lid is pulled laterally while the tendon area is palpated to detect movement of fracture segments. A lack of resistance or movement of the underlying bone is indicative of a fracture.

Page 60: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Illustration shows the palpation of the nose

Page 61: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Bimanual palpation

• instrument is placed in the nose and pushed laterally in the medial canthal area to test for instability and crepitation, which suggests an unstable NOE fracture

Page 62: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

IN CASE OF FRACTURE IN NOE

• swelling in the medial canthal area and pain and crepitation with palpation.

Page 63: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

PALPATION OF NOSE

• simple method to gather information on the function of the internal

patency of the nose.

Page 64: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Examination of the nose starts with inspection for swelling or asymmetry, followed by palpation. Characteristic signs for nasal fractures are:

• Pain

• Bleeding

• Swelling

• Compromised nasal airway

• Crepitation

• Palpable bony dislocation

Page 65: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• The nose can be retruded and impacted at the nasofrontal suture area with lack of support for the nasal septum and cartilages.

Page 66: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• An undetected septal hematoma may also result in the formation of neocartilage, resulting in a widening of the septum and narrowing of the nasal airways

Page 67: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Neck examinationPalpate the posterior neck for any signs of cervical spine trauma

Page 68: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• anterior neck for signs of laryngeal trauma

• If a laryngeal fracture is suspected, CT of the neck recommend.

• Examined for any significant penetrating neck trauma or laceration.

Page 69: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

laryngeal fracture

Placement of an endotracheal tube may be difficult or dangerous if a patient has a large hematoma.

emergency tracheostomy should be considered.

Elective intubation for midface surgery should be delayed

Page 70: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

INTRA-ORAL EXAMINATION

Page 71: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Intraoral examination

Inspection.

• Mouth opening

• Gagging of occlusion

• Lacerations

• Ecchymosis

Page 72: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

EXAMINATION OF PALATE

• Note: Palatal hematoma and/or palatal lacerations can be noted in the sagittally split palate.

Page 73: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Blood Clots / Avulsed teeth

• ECCHYMOSIS/HEMATOMA in –

Buccal Sulcus at buttress region Sublingual region Greater palatine foramen

• Step Defects in Occlusion

• GAGGING OF OCCLUSION

Page 74: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Anterior open bite & Shift of midline

• BUCKET HANDLE FRACTURE

– Bilateral parasymphysial # where the anterior segment is pulled lingually & down by the mylohyoid & digastric respectively , and the postr fragment pulled vertically upwards.

Page 75: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Panfacial fracture showing characteristic anterior open bite deformity which is commonly associated with Le Fort fractures.

Page 76: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

GAGGING OF OCCLUSION DUE TO FRACTURED CONDYLE

Page 77: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma
Page 78: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Intraoral palpation

• Buccal & lingual sulcus –tenderness, alteration in contour, crepitus

• Mandible palpation

• Mobility of maxilla

Page 79: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Differentiating Leforts

Pull forward on maxillary teeth

• Lefort I: maxilla only moves

• Lefort II: maxilla & base of nose move:

• Lefort III: whole face moves:

Page 80: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Mobility of the midface may be tested by grasping the anterior alveolar arch and pulling forward while stabilizing the patient with the other hand.

Page 81: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• testing for mobility of the central midface

Page 82: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• testing for mobility of the midface.

Page 83: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

AUSCULTATION

PERCUSSION• Percussion - Loss of Normal resonance of the

• Maxillary Sinus ( CRACKED TEACUP SOUND )

Page 84: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

TESTS

Page 85: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Acuity testing

Page 86: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Visual field testing

Page 87: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Visual field testing

Page 88: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Testing of ocular motility

Page 89: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Examine the patient to check the extraocularmuscle (EOM) are functioning properly.

Page 90: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

If the extra ocular muscles (EOM) are not functioning properly the surgeon should make sure that there is no entrapment of the soft tissues. It is recommended to perform the forced duction test under sedation, local, or general anesthesia

Page 91: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Gross digital intraocular pressure testing

• This should include an examination of the anterior chamber to rule out a hyphema.

• Severe exophthalmos due to retrobulbar bleeding may need immediate surgical intervention to decrease the intraorbital pressure.

• exophthalmos which is typical for carotid-cavernous-sinus fistula.

Page 92: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Sensory loss.

• Anesthesia/ parasthesia over different parts of face.

- Infraorbital nerve.

- Supraorbital nerve

- Break in continuity of inferior alveolar nerve.

- Facial palsy- peripheral branches, fractures of cranial base involving facial canal.

Page 93: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

Sensory exam of the face

• Illustration shows injury to the zygomatic branches of the facial nerve resulting in inability to close the eye

• Examine the function of the sensory nerves of the face (supraorbital nerve, infraorbital nerve, and mental nerve).

• Examine the function of the motor nerves of the face (frontal (temporal), zygomatic, buccal, marginal mandibular, and the cervical branch of the facial nerve). The most important branches to check are the zygomatic and the marginal mandibular.

Page 94: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Illustration shows the absence of function of the depressor muscles, resulting in asymmetry of the lower lip.

Page 95: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

• Illustration shows injury to the temporal branch resulting in significant brow ptosis and possible visual field impairment with upward gaze.

Page 96: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma

REFERENCES

• Fractures of the Facial Skeleton, Peter Banks

• Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma, 4th Edition,RaymondFonseca, H. Dexter Barber, Michael Powers,David E. Frost

• Online resource- Science-direct

Page 97: Clinical Evaluation in Maxillofacial Trauma