Climate Change Report Emergency Vehicle …...Climate Change Report Emergency Vehicle Operations...

Climate Change Report Emergency Vehicle Operations Course (EVOC) San Diego County, California Project Number PDS2017-MPA-17-007

Prepared for the County of San Diego County of San Diego Planning and Development Services 5510 Overland Avenue, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92123

Project Proponent County of San Diego Department of General Services 5560 Overland Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 Contact: Thomas Hoerstman, Project Manager

Prepared by

William A. Maddux County-Approved CEQA Consultant

RECON Environmental, Inc. 1927 Fifth Avenue San Diego, CA 92101 P 619.308.9333

RECON Number 8265-3 December 20, 2017

v.jonesredding

Text Box

Project No. PDS2017-MUP-17-019 Environmental Log No. PDS2017-ER-93-19-006ZZC

Climate Change Report

Emergency Vehicle Operations Course Project i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Glossary of Terms and Acronyms .......................................................................... iv

Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 1

1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Purpose of the Report ......................................................................................... 2

1.1.1 Previously-Approved California Environmental Quality Act Documents ............................................................................................... 2

1.2 Project Location and Description ....................................................................... 3 1.2.1 Purpose of the Project ............................................................................. 3 1.2.2 Project Location ...................................................................................... 3 1.2.3 Planned Improvements ........................................................................... 3 1.2.4 Access/Security/Parking ......................................................................... 7 1.2.5 Operational Characteristics ................................................................... 8 1.2.6 County Energy Policy and Strategic Plans ............................................ 9 1.2.7 Construction ............................................................................................ 9 1.2.8 Project Design Features ........................................................................ 10

2.0 Existing Conditions....................................................................................... 10 2.1 Greenhouse Gases of Primary Concern ........................................................... 11 2.2 Sources of GHG Emissions ............................................................................... 12 2.3 Potential Climate Change Impacts .................................................................. 13 2.4 Existing Setting ................................................................................................ 13

2.4.1 Statewide GHG Emissions ................................................................... 13 2.4.2 San Diego Countywide GHG Emissions ............................................... 14

2.5 Surrounding Area, Existing Land Use, and Emissions ................................... 15 2.5.1 Surrounding Land Uses ........................................................................ 15 2.5.2 On-site Land Use and Physical Characteristics .................................. 16

2.6 On-Site GHG Inventory ................................................................................... 16 2.7 Regulatory Setting ........................................................................................... 16

2.7.1 Federal Greenhouse Gas Legislation ................................................... 16 2.7.2 State of California Greenhouse Gas Regulations ................................. 17

2.8 State of California Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and Programs ............... 21 2.8.1 Climate Change Scoping Plan .............................................................. 21 2.8.2 Original Scoping Plan GHG Reduction Strategies .............................. 22 2.8.3 Scoping Plan GHG Reduction Strategies ............................................. 24

2.9 San Diego Association of Governments Plans ................................................. 24 2.9.1 Regional Transportation Plan—San Diego Forward ........................... 24

2.10 County of San Diego Plans ............................................................................... 25 2.10.1 County of San Diego General Plan ....................................................... 25 2.10.2 County of San Diego Green Building Incentive Program .................... 25 2.10.3 County of San Diego Construction and Demolition Debris Deposit

Ordinance .............................................................................................. 25


Emergency Vehicle Operations Course Project ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)

3.0 Significance Criteria & Analysis Methodologies .................................... 26 3.1 State CEQA Guidelines .................................................................................... 26 3.2 County of San Diego Guidance—Climate Action Plan .................................... 26 3.3 CAPCOA Guidance—CEQA & Climate Change ............................................. 27 3.4 Significance Thresholds ................................................................................... 27 3.5 Methodology & Assumptions ............................................................................ 28

3.5.1 Construction Emissions ........................................................................ 28 3.5.2 Vehicle Emissions ................................................................................. 30 3.5.3 Energy Emissions ................................................................................. 31 3.5.4 Area Source Emissions ......................................................................... 32 3.5.5 Water and Wastewater Emissions ....................................................... 33 3.5.6 Solid Waste Emissions .......................................................................... 33 3.5.7 GHG Emissions Modeling Summary .................................................... 34

4.0 GHG Emissions Quantification .................................................................. 34 4.1 Carbon Sequestration Loss .............................................................................. 34 4.2 Construction GHG Emissions .......................................................................... 34 4.3 Operational GHG Emissions ............................................................................ 35

5.0 Recommended Project Design Features, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................................... 36 5.1 Project Design Features ................................................................................... 36 5.2 Impacts ............................................................................................................. 36

5.2.1 GHG Emissions ..................................................................................... 36 5.2.2 Plan, Policy, and Regulatory Conflicts ................................................. 37

5.3 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................ 43

6.0 References ....................................................................................................... 43

7.0 List of Preparers and Persons and Organizations Contacted ............ 45

FIGURES

1: Regional Location .......................................................................................................... 4 2: Project Location on Aerial Photograph ......................................................................... 5 3: Project Site Plan ........................................................................................................... 6


Emergency Vehicle Operations Course Project iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)

TABLES

1: Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes ............................................. 11 2: California GHG Emissions by Sector in 1990, 2008, and 2014 ................................... 14 3: San Diego County GHG Emissions By Sector in 2010 ................................................ 15 4: Construction Equipment List ....................................................................................... 29 5: Trip Generation ............................................................................................................. 31 6: Annual Vehicle Miles Travels ....................................................................................... 31 7: San Diego Gas & Electric Intensity Factors ................................................................ 32 8: Summary of GHG Emission Calculation Methodology ............................................... 34 9: Summary of Construction Emissions (MT CO2e) ........................................................ 35 10: Operational GHG Emissions in 2020 (MT CO2e) ........................................................ 35 11: Project Consistency with County General Plan Policies ............................................. 38

TECHNICAL ATTACHMENT

1: Modeling Input and Output 2: EVOC Locations with Average Travel Distance


Emergency Vehicle Operations Course Project iv

Glossary of Terms and Acronyms ° F degrees Fahrenheit AB Assembly Bill CAFE Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model CalEPA California Environmental Protection Agency CALGreen California Green Building Standards Code CalRecycle California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery CAP Climate Action Plan CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resources Board CBC California Building Code CCR California Code of Regulations CEC California Energy Commission CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CF Fluorocarbon CH4 Methane City City of San Diego CO2 Carbon dioxide CO2e Equivalent Carbon Dioxide County County of San Diego CPUC California Public Utilities Commission EIR Environmental Impact Report EO Executive Order EOMSP East Otay Mesa Specific Plan EVOC Emergency Vehicle Operations Course GDP gross domestic product GHG Greenhouse gas GWP Global warming potential HFC hydrofluorocarbons IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change LCFS Low Carbon Fuel Standard LEED Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design LEV Low Emission Vehicle mpg miles per gallon mph miles per hour MPO Metro Planning Organization MT CO2e metric ton CO2 equivalent MWh Megawatt per hour N2O Nitrous oxide NF3 Nitrogen trifluoride PFC perfluorocarbons Project Emergency Vehicle Operations Course RPS Renewable Portfolio Standard RTP regional transportation plan SANDAG San Diego Association of Governments


Emergency Vehicle Operations Course Project v

SB Senate Bill SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District l SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy SDG&E San Diego Gas & Electric SF6 sulfur hexafluoride SMAQMD Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District SR State Route Title 24 California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6, California Energy

Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings U.S. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency VMT Vehicle miles traveled


Emergency Vehicle Operations Course Project Page 1

Executive Summary The applicant, County of San Diego Department of General Services, proposes the Emergency Vehicle Operations Course (EVOC) (project), which entails construction of a new facility at the southeast corner of the intersection of Otay Mesa and Alta Roads in the County of San Diego, California.

The proposed facility will offer a driving course for emergency vehicle driver training, an administration building with classrooms for instruction, student and instructor parking, garages or covered structures for training vehicle storage and maintenance, an aboveground fuel tank, restrooms, a covered student observation area, and an observation tower.

The driving course will encompass the largest portion of the approximately 40-acre project site and will consist of a pursuit track/transition/car control course for high-speed training, skills pad and a street grid. A skills pad will be constructed for skid car training and slow speed driving exercises.

This report evaluates the potential global climate change impacts associated with the proposed project. An assessment was made to estimate the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that would be emitted as a result of construction and operation of the proposed project given its GHG reducing design features. The construction sources of GHG emissions that were calculated included: heavy construction equipment, worker vehicle miles traveled, and water use. The calculated operational sources of GHG emissions sources included energy, transportation, water, and solid waste. The proposed project would result in the equivalent annual emission of 835 metric tons (MT) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) in 2020.

The County of San Diego has not adopted a threshold of significance for general use as part of its environmental review process. This analysis assesses the proposed project’s GHG emissions based on the 900 MT CO2e screening level identified by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA). The 900 MT CO2e screening level is a screening level to determine project emissions with potential to impact the environment or achievement of state GHG reduction target identified by Executive Order (EO) S-3-05 and codified by Assembly Bill (AB) 32. As the project’s annual emissions do not exceed 900 MT CO2e, impacts would be less than cumulatively considerable. Additionally, the project would be consistent with all applicable policies from the County of San Diego’s General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Impacts to global climate change would be less than significant.



1.0 Introduction An Emergency Vehicle Operations Course (EVOC) is proposed to provide a venue for hands-on vehicle and classroom training courses primarily to public safety personnel. The County of San Diego (County) will consider allowing other driver training users, depending on schedule capacity and availability. An EVOC is a critical facility for law enforcement and public safety training. The California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training sets the minimum standards for law enforcement personnel throughout the state and establishes requirements to obtain and maintain peace officer status. In order to become a peace officer, recruits must complete 40 hours of EVOC training during a six-month academy. Upon completing the academy, peace officers in California are required to attend 4 hours of Perishable Skills Training in emergency vehicle operations biennially. The proposed EVOC site is intended to replace an inadequate leased venue on the Qualcomm Stadium parking lot, currently used to train the San Diego Regional Public Safety Training Institute recruits as well as City of San Diego (City) and County law enforcement and public safety personnel. With the pending sale of the Qualcomm Stadium, this venue may no longer be available after 2018. At present, there is no dedicated vehicle training facility in the San Diego region that can provide the level of training offered by a purpose-built EVOC site. The nearest equivalent facility is located in Riverside County.

1.1 Purpose of the Report This report evaluates the significance of the project’s contribution of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to statewide GHG emissions.

1.1.1 Previously-Approved California Environmental Quality Act Documents

On July 27, 1994, the County certified the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the East Otay Mesa Specific Plan (EOMSP). The EOMSP encompasses an area of approximately 3,300 acres in the unincorporated southwestern portion of San Diego County, adjacent to the U.S.-Mexico International Border, and adjoins the City’s 12,505-acre Otay Mesa Community Plan area.

Subsequently, on October 7, 2011, the County certified a Supplemental EIR for the Otay Crossings Commerce Park (Log No. 93-19-006Q; SCH No. 2006041039; Tentative Map [TM] 5405), which was tiered from the 1994 EOMSP EIR. Most recently, on May 17, 2013, the County approved an addendum (dated March 13, 2013) for minor modifications to the Otay Crossings Commerce Park. Modifications included revisions to the tentative map to accommodate the proposed State Route 11 (SR-11) alignment and Port of Entry.



1.2 Project Location and Description 1.2.1 Purpose of the Project

1.2.2 Project Location The project site is located in the unincorporated community of East Otay Mesa within the Otay subregional planning area in the southernmost portion of the County. The 39.685-acre site is a portion of a 311.5-acre site (assessor parcel number 648-070-03) that is approved as part of the Otay Crossings Commerce Park Tentative Map, County of San Diego Tract 5405R, which is located within Subarea 2 of the EOMSP area. The site is located approximately two miles east of the SR-125/SR-905 interchange. Figure 1 shows the regional location of the proposed project. Figure 2 shows an aerial photograph of the project vicinity.

The property proposed for the EVOC project is southeast of the intersection of Otay Mesa and Alta roads. The project site is bordered on the north by a planned extension of Otay Mesa Road, on the west by undeveloped lots that abut the future extension of Alta Road, and on the east by future lots created by the completion of Unit 2 of the approved TM 5405R2. The proposed future extension of SR-11 runs along the southerly border of the project site.

1.2.3 Planned Improvements The proposed facility would offer a driving course for vehicle training, an administration building with classrooms for instruction, student and instructor parking, garages or covered structures for training vehicle storage and maintenance, an aboveground fuel tank, restrooms, a covered student observation area, and an observation tower.

The driving course would encompass the largest portion of the approximately 40-acre project site and would consist of a pursuit track/transition/car control course for high-speed training, skills pad, and a street grid. A lane change course with one or more signalized intersections would simulate vehicular movement and law enforcement procedures. A skills pad would be constructed for skid car training and slow speed driving exercises. Skid cars are vehicles fitted with wheels on each side to provide drivers with skills to maneuver the car during a skid or tilt-up event (i.e., on two wheels). The remaining unpaved areas within the project area would be either covered with decomposed granite, a binding agent, ornamental landscaping, or a non-irrigated hydroseed mix for dust control purposes. Figure 3 shows the project site plan.

FIGURE 1

Regional Location

kj

USMC AIRSTATION

MIRAMAR

USMC AIRSTATION

MIRAMAR

Los PenasquitosCanyon Presv

Mission TrailsRegional Park

Cleveland NF

SutherlandLakeBatiquitos

Lagoon

Lake Hodges

El CapitanReservoir

San VicenteReservoir

LovelandReservoir

SweetwaterReservoir

Lower OtayReservoir

Ti j u a n a

Ri v e r

Sa

nD

ie

go

Ri

ve

r

S

an

Di e

g u i t o

Riv

e

r S a n t a Y s a b e lC r e e k

Sw

e e t w a t er

Ri

ve

r

D u l zu

r a

C

r e

ek

Sa

n

D

i e g u i t o

Ri

v e r

Ot a y R i v e r

E s c

on

d

i d

o

C

re

ek

Sw

ee

tw

a t e r

Riv

er

S

an

Di e g

o

Ri

ve

r

Mesa Grande

Reservation

Jamul Indian

Village

Sycuan

Reservation

Capitan

GrandeReservation

Barona

Reservation

Alpine

Bostonia

Casa deOro-Mount

Helix

Crest

FairbanksRanch

Granite Hills

HarbisonCanyon

Jamul

Lakeside

La Presa

Ramona

RanchoSan Diego

RanchoSanta Fe

San DiegoCountry

Estates

Spring

Valley

Winter Gardens

UV163

UV282

UV78

UV905

UV56

UV54

UV75

UV125

UV67

UV94

UV52 §̈¦8

§̈¦805

§̈¦15

§̈¦5 S A N D I E G O

C O U N T Y

M E X I C O

Carlsbad

Chula Vista

Coronado

Del Mar

El Cajon

Encinitas

Escondido

Imperial

Beach

La Mesa

LemonGrove

NationalCity

Poway

San Diego

SanMarcos

Santee

SolanaBeach

kj

USMC AIRSTATION

MIRAMAR

USMC AIRSTATION

MIRAMAR

Los PenasquitosCanyon Presv

Mission TrailsRegional Park

Cleveland NF

SutherlandLakeBatiquitos

Lagoon

Lake Hodges

El CapitanReservoir

San VicenteReservoir

LovelandReservoir

SweetwaterReservoir

Lower OtayReservoir

Ti j u a n a

Ri v e r

Sa

nD

ie

go

Ri

ve

r

S

an

Di e

g u i t o

Riv

e

r S a n t a Y s a b e lC r e e k

Sw

e e t w a t er

Ri

ve

r

D u l zu

r a

C

r e

ek

Sa

n

D

i e g u i t o

Ri

v e r

Ot a y R i v e r

E s c

on

d

i d

o

C

re

ek

Sw

ee

tw

a t e r

Riv

er

S

an

Di e g

o

Ri

ve

r

Mesa Grande

Reservation

Jamul Indian

Village

Sycuan

Reservation

Capitan

GrandeReservation

Barona

Reservation

Alpine

Bostonia

Casa deOro-Mount

Helix

Crest

FairbanksRanch

Granite Hills

HarbisonCanyon

Jamul

Lakeside

La Presa

Ramona

RanchoSan Diego

RanchoSanta Fe

San DiegoCountry

Estates

Spring

Valley

Winter Gardens

UV163

UV282

UV78

UV905

UV56

UV54

UV75

UV125

UV67

UV94

UV52 §̈¦8

§̈¦805

§̈¦15

§̈¦5 S A N D I E G O

C O U N T Y

M E X I C O

Carlsbad

Chula Vista

Coronado

Del Mar

El Cajon

Encinitas

Escondido

Imperial

Beach

La Mesa

LemonGrove

NationalCity

Poway

San Diego

SanMarcos

Santee

SolanaBeach

0 5Miles [

M:\JOBS5\8265\common_gis\fig1_nos.mxd 11/7/2017 fmm

SAN DIEGO

RIVERSIDE

SAN BERNARDINO

ORANGE

MEXICO

Project Locationkj

FIGURE 2

Project Location on Aerial Photograph

PA

SE

OD

ELA

FU

EN

TE

OTAY MESA RD

PA

SE

OD

ELA

FU

EN

TE

OTAY MESA RD

Image Source: Nearmap (flown June 2017)

0 300Feet [

Recreational Zone

\\serverfs01\gis\JOBS5\8265\common_gis\fig2_nos.mxd 11/7/2017 fmm

ADMIN & TRAINING BLDG

2 STORY 50,000 S.F.

SKILLS PAD(350' x 440')

STREET GRID

OFF-HIGWAYVEHICLESKILLS

COURSE

PURSUITTRACK

SR-11

OTAY MESA ROAD

GA

RA

GE

1G

AR

AG

E 2

PR

OP

OS

ED

PR

OP

OS

ED

PROPOSED

LEGEND:

FIGURE 3

Site Plan

M:\jobs5\8265\nos\graphics\eir\fig3.ai 12/13/17 sab

Map Source: Michael Baker International

0 180Miles



A level unpaved area measuring approximately 100 feet by 150 feet would be included within the driving course to accommodate all-terrain and off-road vehicles. The training within this off-highway-vehicle skills course would consist of slower speed exercises designed to get riders comfortable operating in a static environment before training elsewhere in the County under more rugged trail conditions. Students would be required to navigate through a series of cone patterns. Most of the exercises would be conducted just above idle and at the fastest obstacle (collision avoidance), probably about 15 to 20 miles per hour (mph) for the most advanced riders. After each skills course, the unpaved training area would be dragged to remain smooth and level and then watered to ensure it remains compact, rut free, and to provide dust suppression.

An observation tower would be centrally located between the skills pad, the street grid, and near the midpoint of the pursuit track to allow instructors to view vehicle operations on the different venues.

It is anticipated the administrative and training building area would not exceed 50,000 square feet and two stories in height. The administrative space would provide classrooms, restrooms, a training gym, Force Options Simulators room, Law Enforcement Driving Simulators rooms, a break room, conference room, and administrative offices. Paved surface parking for personal vehicles would be provided adjacent to the administration building. Training vehicles would be stored in a secured and canopied lot, or stored indoors in a warehouse or garage building. With the exception of the administrative and training building and the observation tower, all structures would be single story. The observation tower is proposed at a maximum height of 40 feet.

Phasing of the project is anticipated and may be implemented in several phases without regard to sequence. Interim facilities may be placed in the initial phase (e.g., portable restrooms, office trailers, and sea cargo containers). It is estimated that construction of the initial phase would begin in the second quarter of 2019 and would take 12 months.

1.2.4 Access/Security/Parking Primary access to the site is currently planned off Otay Mesa Road. This access is proposed as a 32-foot-wide driveway totaling 265 feet to the project gate with a turnaround for fire apparatus at 145 feet from Otay Mesa Road. This would limit stacking of vehicles on to Otay Mesa Road. Entry driveways would be gated to prevent public access and to ensure security of the facility. The perimeter of the proposed development area (within the property boundaries) would be fenced to a maximum 8 feet in height, and may include wrought iron and vinyl-coated chain link fencing.

Limited lighting would be installed in the on-site parking areas and on the exterior of buildings for purposes of security and safety. The driving course would not be lighted. Timers, motion sensors, and security cameras may also be utilized to ensure security of on-site structures and occupants and to reduce nighttime lighting. All project lighting would be designed and installed in accordance with the County of San Diego’s lighting ordinance.



The project proposes 170 off-street parking spaces, including 6 Americans with Disabilities Act accessible parking spaces.

1.2.5 Operational Characteristics The proposed operational program for the new facility includes: training in the safe operations of emergency, general, and special purpose vehicles; tactical exercises; training on simulators; general classroom instruction and meetings; physical fitness activities, and program administration.

Both traditional classroom and scenario training would occur within the administration building. The Law Enforcement Driving Simulators is a training simulator designed around the driver seat of a police pursuit vehicle. The system has three screens which provide stimuli to users to mimic a vehicle pursuit or Code-3 response (i.e., responding with lights and sirens activated). The Force Options Simulators is a training simulator that provides training in the use of multiple force options available to law enforcement through the use of video simulations. The Force Options Simulators can be linked into the Law Enforcement Driving Simulators to simulate a foot pursuit or use of force encounter following a vehicle pursuit or Code-3 response.

Driving exercises within the EVOC skills pad area would include slow-speed (approximately 10 to 35 mph) vehicle operations including: parallel parking; “t-box” maneuvers (a series of tight turns to enter and exit in the shape of a “T”); offset lane changes; a steering course; cul-de-sac exercises; collision avoidance; motorcycle exercises; exercises for buses, trucks, and vans; and skid car exercises. Driving exercises on the street grid would include training for pursuit driving and intersection analysis. It is anticipated that six to eight vehicles would utilize the transition and car control course, grid, and lane change course at any given time, depending on the obstacles present within the course and vehicle spacing. Driving exercises on the high-speed pursuit track (approximately 65 mph) would include training for Code-3 driving, pursuit driving, and high-speed vehicle maneuvers. It is anticipated that up to three cars would utilize the pursuit track at a given time.

The facility would operate year-round, with administrative and training functions generally occurring between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. It is anticipated that the facility would also host evening (nighttime driver training for law enforcement is required by the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training) and weekend classes to accommodate personnel or programs that cannot be scheduled during the typical Monday through Friday work week.

It is estimated that the facility could host an estimated maximum 180 students at any given time depending on the scheduling of instruction, with an anticipated average of approximately 80 students on-site at one time during typical operational hours. If multiple classes were scheduled for the same day, the student groups would rotate between classroom training and driving course training.



It is anticipated that approximately 10 to 20 staff/instructors would be assigned to the facility on either a full-time or part-time basis. The total maximum occupants on-site at one time could reach 200, based on full facility buildout and demand.

Minor vehicle maintenance would be performed on-site via a contracted mobile mechanic who would bring supplies to perform oil changes, tire rotations, and wheel balances. The contractor would be responsible for removal of all hazardous waste per the contract. No car washing is proposed on-site.

Nighttime training classes would consist of 30 to 40 students and 6 instructors, and would involve high-speed vehicle maneuvers during low light and nighttime conditions including Code-3 response. The vehicles that would be used have emergency light bars and vehicle headlights that would be in use during the night driving exercises. A limited number of portable lamps with a shielded downward emitting light source would illuminate the staging areas for students; however, the driving course itself would not be illuminated in order to mimic real-life nighttime scenarios. Lighting for on-site buildings and parking areas would be required for the safety of the training staff and students attending nighttime training events. All lighting would be directed downward and shielded.

The project would be visible from Otay Mesa Road to the north and from the (currently undeveloped) industrial lots to the east and west. The future extension of SR-11 along the southern boundary of the project is estimated to be 10 to 15 feet below the final grade of the EVOC and views into the site from that highway would be limited. All project elements would be designed to be compatible with the surrounding visual landscape and would include colors, textures, and vegetative design elements consistent with the surrounding community character.

1.2.6 County Energy Policy and Strategic Plans The project is subject to County design requirement, included in Board Policy G-15 Design Standards for County Facilities and Properties (Policy G-15). In addition to Policy G-15, the County has the adopted 2015-2020 Strategic Energy Plan.

1.2.7 Construction The approximately 40-acre site would be graded by permit to accommodate the EVOC project prior to acquisition by the County. For this initial grading, it is anticipated that approximately 50,000 cubic yards earthwork would be required. No import or export of material would be required. Post-grading on-site elevations would range from approximately 606 feet above mean sea level to approximately 558 feet above mean sea level across the project site. Some additional grading would be required during construction of the EVOC to establish finished grades for buildings and parking, the driving course, and any additional drainage facilities or on-site utilities that may be required.



1.2.8 Project Design Features The proposed project has been designed with a goal to comply with criteria established in the Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design (LEED) rating system. LEED is an internationally recognized green building certification system, providing third-party verification that a building was designed and built using strategies aimed at improving building siting and orientation, energy savings, water efficiency, waste reduction, use of recycled and sustainable building materials, non-toxic building and surfacing materials, and incorporation of other innovative features such as green roofs and on-site energy generation. These strategies also serve to reduce GHG emissions.

LEED was developed by the U.S. Green Building Council and provides building owners and operators a concise framework for identifying and implementing practical and measurable green building design, construction, operation, and maintenance. Projects applying for LEED certification are awarded points that are distributed across major categories such as sustainable sites, water efficiency, energy and atmosphere, materials and resources, and indoor environmental quality. Depending on the number of points earned, projects can be classified as Certified, Silver, Gold, or Platinum.

2.0 Existing Conditions To evaluate the incremental effect of the proposed project on global climate change it is important to have a basic understanding of the nature of the global climate change problem. Global climate change is a change in the average weather of the earth, which can be measured by wind patterns, storms, precipitation, and temperature. The earth’s climate is in a state of constant flux, with periodic warming and cooling cycles. Extreme periods of cooling are termed “ice ages,” which may then be followed by extended periods of warmth. For most of the earth’s geologic history, these periods of warming and cooling have been the result of many complicated, interacting natural factors that include volcanic eruptions which spew gases and particles (dust) into the atmosphere, amount of water, vegetation, and ice covering the earth’s surface, subtle changes in the earth’s orbit, and amount of energy released by the sun (sun cycles). However, since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution around 1750, the average temperature of the earth has been increasing at a rate that is faster than can be explained by natural climate cycles alone.

GHGs influence the amount of heat that is trapped in the earth’s atmosphere and thus play a critical role in determining the earth’s surface temperature. Outgoing infrared radiation is absorbed by GHGs, resulting in a warming of the atmosphere. This phenomenon, known as the “greenhouse effect,” is responsible for maintaining a habitable climate on earth. With the Industrial Revolution came an increase in the combustion of carbon-based fuels such as wood, coal, oil, and biofuels, as well as the creation of GHG-emitting substances not found in nature. Such human activities have increased atmospheric GHG levels in excess of natural ambient concentrations. This has led to a trend of unnatural warming of the earth’s atmosphere and oceans, with corresponding effects on global circulation patterns and climate.



2.1 Greenhouse Gases of Primary Concern There are numerous GHGs, both naturally occurring (i.e., biogenic) and artificial (i.e., anthropogenic). Table 1 summarizes some of the most common. Each GHG has a variable atmospheric lifetime and global warming potential (GWP).

Table 1 Global Warming Potentials and Atmospheric Lifetimes

Gas Atmospheric Lifetime

(years) 100-year GWP 20-year GWP Carbon dioxide (CO2) 50–200 1 1 Methane (CH4)* 12 25 72 Nitrous oxide (N2O) 114 298 289 HFC-23 270 14,800 12,000 HFC-32 4.9 675 2,330 HFC-125 29 3,500 6,350 HFC-134a 14 1,430 3,830 HFC-143a 52 4,470 5,890 HFC-152a 1.4 124 437 HFC-227ea 34.2 3,220 5,310 HFC-236fa 240 9,810 8,100 HFC-43-10mee 15.9 1,640 4,140 CF4 50,000 7,390 5,210 C2F6 10,000 12,200 8,630 C3F8 2,600 8,830 6,310 C4F10 2,600 8,860 6,330 c-C4F8 3,200 10,300 7,310 C5F12 4,100 9,160 6,510 C6F14 3,200 9,300 6,600 SF6 3,200 22,800 16,300 SOURCE: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2014. GWP = Global warming potential

The atmospheric lifetime of a GHG is the average time the molecule stays stable in the atmosphere. Most GHGs have long atmospheric lifetimes, staying in the atmosphere hundreds or thousands of years. The potential of a gas to trap heat and warm the atmosphere is measured by its GWP. The reference gas for establishing GWP is carbon dioxide, which—as shown in Table 1—consequently has a GWP of 1. As an example, methane, while having a shorter atmospheric lifetime than carbon dioxide, has a 100-year GWP of 28, which means that it has a greater global warming effect than carbon dioxide on a molecule-by-molecule basis. For purposes of reporting GHG emissions, all GHGs are converted to a common factor and reported as carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e).

Although there are dozens of GHGs, state law defines GHGs as the following seven compounds: carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3). Of these gases, CO2, CH4, and N2O are produced by both biogenic and anthropogenic sources, and are the GHGs of primary concern in this analysis. The remaining gases occur as the result of industrial processes, such as refrigeration, aluminum production,



semiconductor manufacture, and insulation in electric power transmission and distribution equipment, and are not of primary concern to this analysis.

2.2 Sources of GHG Emissions The main sources of GHG emissions and the major sectors identified for emissions reductions strategies by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) include transportation, electric power, residential, commercial, industrial land uses, recycling and waste, high global warming potential sources, agriculture, and forestry. Two of these GHG emission sectors account for the majority of GHG emissions generated within California: transportation and electric power.

The transportation sector includes the GHG emissions associated with on-road vehicles, off-road vehicles, aviation, ships, and rail. GHG emissions from on-road and off-road vehicles are generated from the engines’ combustion of fossil fuels and thus are typically estimated based on fuel type, fuel quantity consumed, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). CO2 emissions account for the majority of GHG emissions from mobile sources and are directly related to the quantity of fuel combusted, while CH4 and N2O emissions depend more on the emissions-control technologies employed in the vehicle and distance traveled.

Emissions from the electric power sector, as measured statewide, represent the GHG emissions associated with use and production of electrical energy, including electricity generated out of state. Electricity use is associated with fulfilling commercial, residential and industrial energy needs, as well as with collecting, treating, storing, and distributing water, wastewater, and solid waste.

Direct GHG emissions from the commercial and residential sector include area sources such as landscape maintenance equipment, fireplaces, and natural gas consumption for space and water heating. Indirect GHG emissions are also generated off-site at electricity-generating plants to meet commercial and residential electricity demand for heating, cooling, ventilating, lighting, and appliance needs. At the state level, these indirect electricity emissions are counted in the electric power sector. At the project-level, both the electricity and natural gas needs of a project are counted in the operational emissions estimates.

GHG emissions associated with industrial land uses, such as manufacturing plants and refineries, are predominantly comprised of stationary sources (e.g., boilers and engines) associated with industrial processes.

The recycling and waste sector represents the GHG emissions associated with operations at waste management facilities and landfills. GHG emissions are generated from solid waste disposal (including emissions associated with anaerobic and aerobic decomposition that primarily produce CH4 and CO2 emissions, respectively) and alternative daily cover (i.e., organic material used to cover waste piles, which also decompose and generate GHG emissions).



Examples of high global warming potential GHG sources include refrigerants (e.g., HFCs), industrial gases (e.g., PFCs and NF3), and electrical insulation (e.g., SF6). Although these GHGs are typically generated in much smaller quantities than CO2, their high GWP results in considerable CO2e statewide.

The agriculture sector represents the GHG emissions associated with agricultural processes as generated through the use of off-road farm equipment, irrigation pumps, residue burning, livestock, and fertilizer volatilization.

GHG emissions associated with the forestry sector include emissions from forest and rangeland fires and other disturbances such as pest damage, timber harvesting, wood waste decomposition, and other sources. CARB also tracks sinks or sequestration (i.e., the removal of CO2) associated with forestry.

2.3 Potential Climate Change Impacts The increase in the earth’s temperature is expected to have wide-ranging effects on the environment. Although global climate change is anticipated to affect all areas of the globe, there are numerous implications of direct importance to California. Statewide average temperatures are anticipated to increase by between 3 and 10.5 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) by 2100 (California Climate Change Center 2006). Some climate models indicate that this warming may be greater in the summer than in the winter. This could result in widespread adverse impacts to ecosystem health, agricultural production, water use and supply, and energy demand. Increased temperatures could reduce the Sierra Nevada snowpack and put additional strain on the region’s water supply. In addition, increased temperatures would be conducive to the formation of air pollutants resulting in poor air quality.

The anticipated consequences of global climate change have the potential to result in adverse impacts to the proposed project. Future patrons of the proposed project could be exposed to increased risk of dehydration, heat stroke, heat exhaustion, heart attack, stroke, and respiratory disease. However, these risks would be no different from those experienced by the San Diego region as a whole. Increased temperatures would result in more frequent use of air conditioning that would increase energy costs and that could put a strain on the area’s energy supplies. Because the proposed project is located inland well above sea level, no impacts related to sea level rise are anticipated.

It is also important to note that even if GHG emissions were to be eliminated or dramatically reduced, due to the lifespan of GHGs in the atmosphere it is projected that the effect of those emissions would continue to affect global climate for centuries.

2.4 Existing Setting 2.4.1 Statewide GHG Emissions The CARB performs statewide GHG inventories. The inventory is divided into nine broad sectors of economic activity: agriculture, commercial, electricity generation, forestry, high



GWP emitters, industrial, recycling and waste, residential, and transportation. Emissions are quantified in million MT CO2e. Table 2 shows the estimated statewide GHG emissions for the years 1990, 2005, and 2014.

Table 2 California GHG Emissions by Sector in 1990, 2005, and 2014

Sector

1990 Emissions in million MT CO2e (% total)1,2

2005 Emissions in million MT CO2e

(% total)2,3,4


(% total)2,3,4 Sources

Agriculture 23.4 (5%) 34.45 (7%) 36.11 (8%) Commercial 14.4 (3%) 14.27 (3%) 14.61 (3%) Electricity Generation 110.6 (26%) 107.85 (22%) 88.24 (20%) High GWP -- 7.70 (2%) 17.15 (4%) Industrial 103.0 (24%) 95.41 (20%) 93.32 (21%) Recycling and Waste -- 7.94 (2%) 8.85 (2%) Residential 29.7 (7%) 27.98 (6%) 23.73 (5%) Transportation 150.7 (35%) 184.21 (38%) 159.53 (36%)

Forestry (Net CO2 flux)5 -6.5 -- -- Not Specified 1.3 -- -- TOTAL 426.6 479.81 441.54 SOURCE: CARB 2007 and 2016. MT CO2e = metric tons of CO2 equivalent 1 1990 data was retrieved from the CARB 2007 source. 2 Quantities and percentages may not total properly due to rounding. 3 2005 and 2014 data were retrieved from the CARB 2016 source. 4 Reported emissions for key sectors. The inventory totals for 2005 and 2014 did not

include Forestry or Not Specified sources.

As shown in Table 2, statewide GHG source emissions totaled about 427 million MT CO2e in 1990, 480 million MT CO2e in 2005, and 442 million MT CO2e in 2014. Many factors affect year-to-year changes in GHG emissions, including economic activity, demographic influences, environmental conditions such as drought, and the impact of regulatory efforts to control GHG emissions. However, transportation-related emissions consistently contribute the most GHG emissions, followed by electricity generation and industrial emissions.

2.4.2 San Diego Countywide GHG Emissions A San Diego County regional emissions inventory was prepared by the University of San Diego School of Law, Energy Policy Initiative Center that took into account the unique characteristics of the region. Their 2010 emissions inventory for San Diego is duplicated in Table 3. The sectors included in this inventory are somewhat different from those in the statewide inventory, which is based on the 2008 Scoping Plan categories.



Table 3 San Diego County GHG Emissions By Sector in 2010

Sector


(% total)1 Agriculture/Forestry/Land Use 0.05 0.2% Waste 0.6 1.8% Electricity 8.3 25.0% Natural Gas Consumption 2.9 8.7% Industrial Processes & Products 1.8 5.4% On-Road Transportation 14.4 43.4% Off-Road Equipment and Vehicles 1.4 4.2% Civil Aviation 1.9 5.7% Rail 0.32 1.0% Water-Borne Navigation 0.1 0.3% Other Fuels/Other 1.58 4.8% Land Use Wildfires 0.28 0.8% Development (Loss of Vegetation) 0.18 0.5% Sequestration -0.66 -0.5% TOTAL 33.15 SOURCE: University of San Diego 2013. 1Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

Similar to the statewide emissions, transportation-related GHG emissions contributed the most countywide, followed by emissions associated with energy use. Transportation accounts for a higher proportion of GHG emissions in San Diego compared to the state, while electricity-related emissions represent the same proportion relative to the state as a whole. Industrial and agricultural emissions are substantially less represented in San Diego County compared to the state.

2.5 Surrounding Area, Existing Land Use, and Emissions

2.5.1 Surrounding Land Uses Uses surrounding the project site include undeveloped land and industrial uses. All properties immediately adjacent to the site are vacant. Existing uses in the vicinity of the proposed project include a power plant, a state prison, private and County detention facilities, open vehicle storage, and several industrial business parks. A landfill and recycling center is proposed northeast of the project site. Brown Field, a City-owned general aviation airport, is located three miles to the west and the Tijuana International Airport is three miles to the southwest across the U.S.-Mexico International Border.



2.5.2 On-site Land Use and Physical Characteristics The project site is presently zoned S88 and has a General Plan land use designation of Mixed Industrial. No changes to the existing zoning or land use are required for the project as proposed. However, the proposed project requires a Major Use Permit under the East Otay Mesa Specific Plan and County’s Zoning Ordinance.

The site is presently undeveloped and is located within an approved tentative map (TM 5405R) encompassing 311.5 acres. On April 6, 2017, a revised tentative map (revised map), PDS2017-TM-5405R, was submitted to the County to reduce the number of lots from 47 to 33, in order to create four lots totaling 40 acres. On June 28, 2017, another revised map was submitted, TM 5405R2, that consolidated the four lots to be purchased by the County into one lot, Unit 1 Lot 3. TM 5405R2 was approved by the Planning Commission on October 6, 2017.

The existing site topography is currently mild sloping mesa that ascends north and off-site to the San Ysidro Mountains.

2.6 On-Site GHG Inventory The existing site is graded and there are no current sources of on-site GHG emissions or sequestration.

2.7 Regulatory Setting 2.7.1 Federal Greenhouse Gas Legislation

2.7.1.1 GHG Emissions Intensity Reduction Programs

Towards the effort to reduce GHG emissions, in February 2002, the U.S. set a goal to reduce its GHG emissions intensity, which is the ratio of GHG emissions to economic output. In 2002, the U.S. GHG Emissions Intensity was 183 metric tons per million dollars of gross domestic product (GDP; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA [U.S. EPA] 2007). The goal established in February 2002 was to reduce this GHG emissions intensity by 18 percent by 2012 through various GHG reduction programs. One of these programs includes the Energy Star program that was first established in 1992 by the U.S. EPA and became a joint program with the U.S. Department of Energy in 1996. Energy Star is a program that labels energy efficient products with the Energy Star label. Energy Star enables consumers to choose energy-efficient and cost-saving products, with up to 30 percent energy savings over conventional appliances such as refrigerators, dishwashers, clothes washers, and fans. Another key federal GHG reduction program is the Green Power Partnership program that establishes partnerships between the U.S. EPA, and companies and organizations that have bought or are considering buying green power (i.e., power generated from renewable energy sources). The U.S. EPA offers recognition and promotion to organizations that replace electricity consumption with green power.



2.7.1.2 U.S. EPA Authority to Regulate GHGs

On April 2, 2007, in Massachusetts v. U.S. EPA; Case 549 U.S. 497 (2007), the U.S Supreme Court ruled that CO2 is an air pollutant as defined under the Clean Air Act, and that the U.S. EPA has the authority to regulate GHG emissions.

2.7.1.3 Corporate Average Fuel Economy

The federal Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards determine the fuel efficiency of certain vehicle classes in the U.S. While the standards had not changed since 1990, as a part of the Energy and Security Act of 2007, the CAFE standards were increased for new light-duty vehicles to achieve the equivalent of 35 miles per gallon (mpg) by 2020. In October 2012, the U.S. EPA and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued a final rule for new light-duty vehicles for model years 2017 to 2025 to achieve an equivalent of 54.5 mpg. With improved gas mileage, fewer gallons of transportation fuel would be combusted to travel the same distance, thereby reducing nationwide GHG emissions associated with vehicle travel.

2.7.2 State of California Greenhouse Gas Regulations The State of California has passed a number of policies and regulations that are either directly or indirectly related to GHG emissions. Only those most relevant to land use development projects are included in this discussion.

2.7.2.1 Executive Order S-3-05

EO S-3-05 proclaims that California is vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, including increased temperatures that could reduce the Sierra-Nevada’s snowpack, further exacerbate California’s air quality problems, and potentially cause a rise in sea levels. To combat those concerns, it established the following GHG emission reduction targets for the state of California:

• by 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; • by 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; • by 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels.

This EO also directed the secretary of the California EPA (CalEPA) to oversee the efforts made to reach these targets, and to prepare biannual reports on the progress made toward meeting the targets and on the impacts to California related to global warming. The first such Climate Action Team Assessment Report was produced in March 2006 and has been updated every two years thereafter.

Of note, in adopting AB 32, discussed below, the Legislature did not adopt the 2050 horizon-year goal from the EO; and, in the last legislative session, the Legislature rejected legislation to enact the EO’s 2050 goal (see Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Association of Governments (2017) Case No. S223603; Professional Engineers in



California Government v. Schwarzenegger (2010) 50 Cal.4th 989, 1015; and State of California 2004).

2.7.2.2 Assembly Bill 32—California Global Warming Solutions Act

In response to EO S-3-05, the California Legislature passed AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, and thereby enacted Sections 38500-38599 of the California Health and Safety Code. It required the CARB to establish an emissions cap and adopt rules and regulations that would reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. AB 32 also required CARB to adopt a plan by January 1, 2009 indicating how emission reductions would be achieved from significant GHG sources via regulations, market mechanisms, and other actions.

2.7.2.3 Executive Order B-30-15

This EO, issued on April 29, 2015, established an interim GHG emission reduction goal for the state of California to reduce GHG emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. This EO also directed all state agencies with jurisdiction over GHG-emitting sources to implement measures designed to achieve the new interim 2030 goal, as well as the pre-existing long-term 2050 goal established by EO S-3-05. Additionally, this EO directed CARB to update its Climate Change Scoping Plan to address the 2030 goal. CARB has released a draft of the statewide inventory and projection data for 2030, and identified reduction strategies capable of securing emission reductions that allow for achievement of the EO’s new interim goal.

2.7.2.4 Senate Bill 32—California Global Warming Solutions Act: Emissions Limit

In August 2016, the California Legislature approved Senate Bill (SB) 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act: Emissions Limit, and in September 2016, it was signed by Governor Brown. Under SB 32, the state would reduce its GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. SB 32 is tied to AB 197, which would establish a legislative oversight committee to which the Chair of CARB would report once a year, and would add two members of the legislature to the CARB. Additionally, in implementing the 40 percent reduction target, AB 197 would require CARB to prioritize emissions reductions to consider the social costs of the emissions of GHGs. AB 197 defines “social costs” to mean “an estimate of the economic damages, including, but not limited to, changes in net agricultural productivity; impacts to public health; climate adaptation impacts, such as property damages from increased flood risk; and changes in energy system costs, per metric ton of greenhouse gas emission per year.”



2.7.2.5 Senate Bill 375—Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008

SB 375, the Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008, was signed into law in September 2008 and requires CARB to set regional targets for reducing passenger vehicle GHG emissions. The purpose of SB 375 is to align regional transportation planning efforts, regional GHG reduction targets, and fair-share housing allocations under state housing law. SB 375 requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) to adopt a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) or Alternative Planning Strategy to address GHG reduction targets from cars and light-duty trucks in the context of that Metro Planning Organization MPO’s Regional Transportation Plan.

2.7.2.6 Senate Bill 97—California Environmental Quality Act Greenhouse Gas Amendments

SB 97 (Chapter 185, Statutes of 2007; Public Resources Code, Sections 21083.05 and 21097) acknowledges that climate change is a prominent environmental issue that requires analysis under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The California Natural Resources Agency adopted amendments to the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations [CCR], Title 14, Sections 15000-15387) to address GHG emissions, consistent with Legislature‘s directive in Public Resources Code Section 21083.05 (enacted as part of SB 97 [Chapter 185, Statutes 2007]). These changes took effect in March 2010.

2.7.2.7 Title 24—California Building Code

The CCR, Title 24, is referred to as the California Building Code, or CBC. It consists of a compilation of several distinct standards and codes related to building construction, including plumbing, electrical, interior acoustics, energy efficiency, handicap accessibility, and so on. Of particular relevance to GHG reductions are the CBC’s energy efficiency and green building standards as outlined below.

Title 24, Part 6—Energy Efficiency Standards

The CCR, Title 24, Part 6 is the California Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (also known as the California Energy Code). This Code, originally enacted in 1978, establishes energy efficiency standards for residential and non-residential buildings in order to reduce California’s energy consumption. The Energy Code is updated periodically to incorporate and consider new energy-efficient technologies and methodologies as they become available, and incentives in the form of rebates and tax breaks are provided on a sliding scale for buildings achieving energy efficiency above the minimum standards.

The current version of the Energy Code, known as 2016 Title 24, or the 2016 Energy Code, became effective January 1, 2017. The 2016 Energy Code provides mandatory energy-efficiency measures as well as voluntary tiers for increased energy efficiency. The California Energy Commission (CEC), in conjunction with the California Public Utilities Commission



(CPUC), has adopted a goal that all new residential and commercial construction achieve zero net energy by 2020 and 2030, respectively (CPUC 2013). It is expected that achievement of the zero net energy goal will occur via revisions to the Title 24 standards.

New construction and major renovations must demonstrate their compliance with the current Energy Code through submission and approval of a Title 24 Compliance Report to the local building permit review authority and the CEC. The compliance reports must demonstrate a building’s energy performance through use of CEC-approved energy performance software that shows iterative increases in energy efficiency given the selection of various heating, ventilation, and air conditioning; sealing; glazing; insulation; and other components related to the building envelope.

Title 24, Part 11—California Green Building Standards

The California Green Building Standards Code, referred to as CALGreen, was added to Title 24 as Part 11 first in 2009 as a voluntary code, which then became mandatory effective January 1, 2011 (as part of the 2010 CBC). The 2016 CALGreen institutes mandatory minimum environmental performance standards for all ground-up new construction of non-residential and residential structures. Local jurisdictions must enforce the minimum mandatory Green Building Standards and may adopt additional amendments for stricter requirements.

The mandatory standards require:

• Outdoor water use requirements as outlined in Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance emergency standards

• 20 percent mandatory reduction in indoor water use relative to specified baseline levels;

• 65 percent construction/demolition waste diverted from landfills;

• Infrastructure requirements for electric vehicle charging stations; • Mandatory inspections of energy systems to ensure optimal working efficiency; and

• Requirements for low-pollutant emitting exterior and interior finish materials such as paints, carpets, vinyl flooring and particleboards.

Similar to the reporting procedure for demonstrating Energy Code compliance in new buildings and major renovations, compliance with the CALGreen water reduction requirements must be demonstrated through completion of water use reporting forms for new low-rise residential and non-residential buildings. The water use compliance form must demonstrate a 20 percent reduction in indoor water use by either showing a 20 percent reduction in the overall baseline water use as identified in CALGreen or a reduced per-plumbing-fixture water use rate.



2.8 State of California Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan and Programs

2.8.1 Climate Change Scoping Plan As directed by the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, in 2008, CARB adopted the Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change (Original Scoping Plan). CARB has periodically revised GHG emissions forecasts and prepared supplemental revisions to the Original Scoping Plan. In 2014, CARB adopted the comprehensive First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework (First Update to the Scoping Plan) (CARB 2014). The First Update to the Scoping Plan “. . . highlights California’s success to date in reducing its GHG emissions and lays the foundation for establishing a broad framework for continued emission reductions beyond 2020, on the path to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050” (CARB 2014). The First Update to the Scoping Plan found that California is on track to meet the 2020 emissions reduction mandate established by AB 32, and notes that California could reduce emissions further by 2030 to levels squarely in line with those needed to stay on track to reduce emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050, if the state realizes the expected benefits of existing policy goals (CARB 2014).

In conjunction with the First Update to the Scoping Plan, CARB identified “six key focus areas comprising major components of the state’s economy to evaluate and describe the larger transformative actions that will be needed to meet the state’s more expansive emission reduction needs by 2050” (CARB 2014). Those six areas are: (1) energy; (2) transportation (vehicles/equipment, sustainable communities, housing, fuels, and infrastructure); (3) agriculture; (4) water; (5) waste management; and (6) natural and working lands. The First Update identifies key recommended actions for each sector that will facilitate achievement of the 2050 reduction goal.

Based on CARB’s research efforts, it has a “strong sense of the mix of technologies needed to reduce emissions through 2050” (CARB 2014). Those technologies include energy demand reduction through efficiency and activity changes; large-scale electrification of on-road vehicles, buildings, and industrial machinery; decarbonizing electricity and fuel supplies; and the rapid market penetration of efficient and clean energy technologies.

In January 2017, CARB released the 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update, The Proposed Strategy for Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target (Scoping Plan; CARB 2017). The Scoping Plan identifies state strategy for achieving the state’s 2030 interim GHG emissions reduction target codified by SB 32. The Scoping Plan assessed three scenarios: (1) a Reference Scenario that represents current policies prior to the passage of SB 350 (i.e., October 2015); (2) a Proposed Scoping Plan Scenario (referred to as the “Draft Scoping Plan Scenario”) that represents current policies, known commitments, as well as additional measures to reduce emissions from the refinery sector, and (3) an Alternative 1 Scenario that represents all policies and programs included in the Draft Scoping Plan



Scenario, as well as additional prescriptive measures to meet the 2030 statewide reduction target without reliance on the Cap-and-Trade Program or a carbon tax.

2.8.2 Original Scoping Plan GHG Reduction Strategies The majority of the Scoping Plan’s GHG reduction strategies are directed at the two sectors with the largest GHG emissions contributions: transportation and electricity generation. The GHG reduction strategies for these sectors involve statutory mandates affecting vehicle or fuel manufacture, public transit, and public utilities. The reduction strategies employed by CARB are designed to reduce emissions from existing sources as well as future sources. The most relevant are outlined in the following sections.

2.8.2.1 California Advanced Clean Car Program

The California Advanced Clean Car Program, adopted January 2012, combines the control of smog, soot-causing pollutants and GHG emissions into a single coordinated package of requirements for model years 2015 through 2025. Accordingly, the Advanced Clean Car Program coordinates the goals of the Pavley, low emissions vehicle (LEV), zero emission vehicle, and Clean Fuels Outlet programs in order to lay the foundation for the commercialization and support of these ultra-clean vehicles. AB 1493 (Pavley) directed CARB to adopt vehicle standards that lowered GHG emissions from passenger vehicles and light-duty trucks to the maximum extent technologically feasible, beginning with the 2009 model year. CARB has adopted amendments to its regulations that would enforce AB 1493, but provide vehicle manufacturers with new compliance flexibility. CARB has also adopted a second phase of the Pavley regulations, originally termed “Pavley II” but now called the Low Emission Vehicle III” (LEV III) Standards or Advanced Clean Car Program, that covers model years 2017 to 2025. CARB estimates that LEV III will reduce vehicle GHGs by an additional 4.0 million MT CO2E for a 2.4 percent reduction over Pavley I. These reductions come from improved vehicle technologies such as smaller engines with superchargers, continuously variable transmissions, and hybrid electric drives. On August 7, 2012, the final regulation for the adoption of LEV III became effective.

2.8.2.2 Low Carbon Fuel Standard

EO S-01-07 directed that a statewide goal be established to reduce the carbon intensity of California’s transportation fuels by at least 10 percent by 2020 through a Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS). LCFS promotes the use of GHG-reducing transportation fuels, e.g., liquid biofuels, renewable natural gas, electricity, and hydrogen, through a declining carbon intensity standard. The carbon intensity of a fuel is a measure of the GHG emissions associated with the production, distribution, and consumption of a fuel. CARB approved LCFS in 2009 and implemented it in 2010 as an early action measure under AB 32. Subsequently CARB approved amendments to the LCFS, which began implementation on January 1, 2013. Due to a court ruling that found procedural issues related to the original adoption of the LCFS, CARB readopted the LCFS regulation in September 2015, which went into effect on January 1, 2016. The program establishes a strong framework to



promote the low carbon fuel adoption necessary to achieve the governor's 2030 and 2050 GHG goals (CARB 2016).

2.8.2.3 Renewable Portfolio Standard

The Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) promotes diversification of the state’s electricity supply and decreased reliance on fossil fuel energy sources. Originally adopted in 2002 with a goal to achieve a 20 percent renewable energy mix by 2020 (referred to as the “Initial RPS”), the goal has been accelerated and increased by EOs S-14-08 and S-21-09 to a goal of 33 percent by 2020. In April 2011, SB 2 (1X) codified California’s 33 percent RPS goal. In September 2015, the California Legislature passed SB 350, which increases California’s renewable energy mix goal to 50 percent by the year 2030. Renewable energy includes (but is not limited to) wind, solar, geothermal, small hydroelectric, biomass, anaerobic digestion, and landfill gas.

2.8.2.4 Solid Waste Sources

The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, as modified by AB 341, requires each jurisdiction’s source reduction and recycling element to include an implementation schedule that shows: (1) diversion of 25 percent of all solid waste by January 1, 1995, through source reduction, recycling, and composting activities; (2) diversion of 50 percent of all solid waste on and after January 1, 2000; and (3) diversion of 75 percent of all solid waste by 2020, and annually thereafter. The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) is required to develop strategies, including source reduction, recycling, and composting activities, to achieve the 2020 goal.

CalRecycle published a discussion document, entitled California’s New Goal: 75 Percent Recycling, which identified concepts that would assist the state in reaching the 75 percent goal by 2020. Subsequently, in October 2013, CalRecycle released a revised concept list, entitled Update on AB 341 Legislative Report: Statewide Strategies to Achieve the 75 Percent Goal by 2020.

2.8.2.5 Cap-and-Trade Program

The California Cap-and-Trade Program began in January 2013 and was originally authorized to continue until the end of 2020. The program is a market-based regulation that is designed to reduce GHG emissions associated with major sources by setting a firm cap on overall GHG emissions from covered entities and gradually reducing that cap over time. The program defines major sources as facilities that generate more than 25,000 MT CO2e per year, which includes many electricity generators, refineries, cement production facilities, oil and gas production facilities, glass manufacturing facilities, and food processing plants. Each entity covered by the program is allocated specific GHG emission allowances and is able to buy or sell additional offset credits to other major sources-covered entities. Thus, the program employs market mechanisms to cost effectively reduce overall GHG emissions. Throughout the program’s duration, CARB continues to adjust the overall



GHG emissions cap to achieve emission levels consistent with 2020 statewide GHG emission reduction targets established by AB 32.

The California Cap-and-Trade Program was extended through passage of AB 398 on July 17, 2017. Pursuant to AB 398 the program will be continued through 2030; AB 398 directs CARB to ensure that statewide GHG emissions are reduced to at least 40 percent below the 1990 level by 2030.

2.8.3 Scoping Plan GHG Reduction Strategies Measures under the Draft Scoping Plan Scenario build on existing programs such as the LCFS, Advanced Clean Cars Program, RPS, SCS, the Short-Lived Climate Pollutant Reduction Strategy, and the Cap-and-Trade Program. Additionally, the Draft Scoping Plan proposes further strategies to reduce waste emissions through cogeneration, reduction of GHG emissions from the refinery sector by 20 percent, and new policies to address GHG emissions from natural and working lands. CARB continues to adjust the cap of the Cap-and-Trade Program to achieve emission levels consistent with 2020 statewide GHG emissions reduction targets established by AB 32. Modeling for the Draft Scoping Plan Scenario does not reflect reductions achieved by the Cap-and-Trade Program.

Based on a review of the Scoping Plan and the model used to develop the statewide reduction plan, the prescriptive measures necessary to achieve the State’s 2030 interim GHG reduction target without reliance on the Cap-and-Trade Program include a 5 percent renewable pipeline gas standard, a 25 percent reduction in GHG emissions from the oil and gas extraction sector, a 25 percent reduction in the GHG emissions from the industrial sector, 20 percent flexible demand response from residential and commercial electric appliances, an additional 7 percent increase in the LCFS (from 18 to 25 percent), an additional 10 percent reduction from the refining sector (from 20 to 30 percent), an additional 10 percent increase to RPS (from 50 to 60 percent), increased building energy efficiency standards, and additional transportation demand measures.

2.9 San Diego Association of Governments Plans

2.9.1 Regional Transportation Plan—San Diego Forward

The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is the San Diego region’s MPO. SANDAG completed and adopted the San Diego Forward in October 2015. CARB’s targets for SANDAG call for a 7 percent reduction in GHG emissions per capita from automobiles and light duty trucks compared to 2005 levels by 2020, and a 13 percent reduction by 2035 (SANDAG 2015). The reduction targets are to be updated every eight years, but can be updated every four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the targets. As stated by SANDAG, the strategy set forth in San Diego Forward is to “focus housing and job growth in the urbanized areas where there is existing



and planned infrastructure, protect sensitive habitat and open space, invest in a network that gives residents and workers transportation options that reduce GHG emissions, promote equity for all, and implement the plan through incentives and collaboration” (SANDAG 2015).

Pursuant to Government Code Section 65080(b)(2)(K), an SCS does not: (i) regulate the use of land; (ii) supersede the land use authority of cities and counties; or (iii) require that a city’s or county’s land use policies and regulations, including those in a general plan, be consistent with it. Nonetheless, SB 375 makes regional and local planning agencies responsible for developing those strategies as part of the federally required metropolitan transportation planning process and the state-mandated housing element process (CARB 2014, see also Gov. Code § 65080(b)).

2.10 County of San Diego Plans 2.10.1 County of San Diego General Plan The County’s General Plan incorporates smart growth and land planning principles intended to reduce VMT, and thus a reduction of GHGs. The General Plan aims to accomplish this by locating future development within and near existing infrastructure. The General Plan also directs preparation of a County Climate Action Plan (CAP) with reduction targets; development of regulations to encourage energy-efficient building design and construction; and development of regulations that encourage energy recovery and renewable energy facilities, among other actions. These planning and regulatory efforts are intended to ensure that actions of the County of San Diego do not impede AB 32 and SB 375 mandates (County of San Diego 2011).

2.10.2 County of San Diego Green Building Incentive Program

The County’s Green Building Incentive Program is designed to promote the use of resource-efficient construction materials, water conservation, and energy efficiency in new and remodeled residential and commercial buildings. The program offers incentives of reduced plan check turnaround time and a 7.5 percent reduction in plan check and building permit fees for projects meeting minimum program requirements. Minimum program requirements include compliance with resource conservation measures related to natural resource conservation, water conservation, and energy conservation (County of San Diego 2017).

2.10.3 County of San Diego Construction and Demolition Debris Deposit Ordinance

The County’s Construction and Demolition Recycling Ordinance is designed to promote the diversion of debris from construction and demolition projects away from landfills. The ordinance requires that construction, demolition, or renovation projects with 40,000 square



feet or greater prepare a Debris Management Plan. The plan must demonstrate how the project will achieve diversion of 90 percent diversion of inerts and 70 percent of all other construction materials from a project (County of San Diego 2007).

3.0 Significance Criteria & Analysis Methodologies

3.1 State CEQA Guidelines The California Natural Resources Agency maintains State CEQA Guidelines to assist lead agencies in developing significance thresholds for assessing potentially significant environmental impacts. According to CEQA Guidelines Appendix G Environmental Checklist, implementation of the proposed project would have significant environmental impacts on global climate change if it would:

1) Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; or

2) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of GHGs.

Individual projects do not generate sufficient GHG emissions to have a substantial direct effect on global climate change (South Coast Air Quality Management District [SCAQMD] 2008; San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 2009). However, continued development may contribute to the cumulative global accumulation of GHG emissions that could result in adverse impacts to the environment. Therefore, assessment of climate change impacts is by its nature a cumulative impact.

The State CEQA Guidelines state that a lead agency should make a good-faith effort to estimate the GHG emissions resulting from a project and, in the absence of regulatory standards for GHG emissions or other scientific data to clearly define what constitutes a significant impact, and undertake a project-by-project analysis consistent with available guidance and current CEQA practice. When determining appropriate thresholds, the State CEQA Guidelines allow lead agencies to consider thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts, provided that the thresholds are supported by substantial evidence.

3.2 County of San Diego Guidance—Climate Action Plan

The Conservation and Open Space Element of the County’s General Plan requires that the County prepare, maintain, and implement a CAP. The CAP will establish significance thresholds for assessing GHG emissions. The development of the CAP is currently being processed by the County under the supervision of a court pursuant to a judgment voiding a



prior CAP. The County General Plan does not prohibit the County from adopting interim thresholds prior to adoption of a court approved CAP; however, the County has not adopted a threshold of significance for general use as part of its environmental review process, at this time.

3.3 CAPCOA Guidance—CEQA & Climate Change

Guidance from the CAPCOA report CEQA & Climate Change, dated January 2008, identifies several potential approaches for assessing a project’s GHG emissions (CAPCOA 2008). Among these approaches, the guidance introduces the concept of establishing thresholds based on GHG emission market capture rates. Following this approach, a lead agency defines an acceptable market capture rate and identifies the corresponding emissions level.

The CAPCOA Guidance identifies a project-level threshold that would correspond to a 90 percent GHG emissions market capture rate, annual emission of 900 MT CO2e. Following the rationale presented in the CAPCOA Guidance, projects with annual emissions that do not exceed a screening level of 900 MT CO2e would not impede achievement of state reduction targets and would therefore be less than cumulatively considerable.

3.4 Significance Thresholds The proposed project is anticipated to be operational in 2020. Emissions are generally highest during the first year the project is fully operational and continue to decline in the future as a result of continued implementation of federal and state reduction measures, such as increased federal and state vehicle efficiency standards and utility renewables generation requirements. This analysis estimates the proposed project’s annual emissions in 2020 and assesses the proposed project’s contribution of GHG emissions to statewide GHG emissions and GHG emissions reduction targets based on a screening level of 900 MT CO2e identified by CAPCOA. Project annual emissions that do not exceed 900 MT CO2e would not conflict with the state reduction targets and would therefore be less than cumulatively considerable. Project annual emissions that exceed 900 MT CO2e would warrant more detailed conformity analysis for 2020 and 2030 targets.

The screening level used in this analysis is not based on the future County CAP and not based upon a threshold adopted by a public hearing process, but rather it is considered to be appropriate based on the nature of the proposed project. The screening level used in this analysis represents a good faith effort to evaluate whether GHG impacts from the proposed project may be significant, taking into account the type and location of the proposed development, the best available scientific data regarding GHG emissions, and the current state reduction targets and strategies for reduction of GHG emissions.



3.5 Methodology & Assumptions To evaluate the project’s net GHG emissions, emissions were calculated using CAPCOA’s California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), version 2016.3.2 and the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District’s (SMAQMD) 2016 Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0 (CAPCOA 2017; SMAQMD 2016).

CalEEMod was developed with the participation of several state air districts and incorporates various vehicle parameters based information specific to each county or air district. Construction and operations emissions associated with the building and parking lot were modeled using CalEEMod. The Road Construction Emissions Model was developed by the SMAQMD for use on roadways and similar linear construction projects. Construction emissions associated with the pursuit track, street grid track, and skills pads were calculated using the Road Construction Emissions Model.

The analysis methodology and input data are described in the following sections. Where project-specific data is not available, model inputs were based on information provided in the CalEEMod User’s Guide (CAPCOA 2017). Specific construction schedules are not available at this time; however, as the project is scheduled to be operational in year 2020. Therefore, the construction schedule was modeled beginning March 2019 with an ending date of March 2020.

3.5.1 Construction Emissions Construction activities emit GHGs primarily though combustion of fuels (mostly diesel) in the engines of off-road construction equipment and through combustion of diesel and gasoline in on-road construction vehicles and the commute vehicles of the construction workers. Smaller amounts of GHGs are also emitted through the energy use embodied in water use for fugitive dust control.

Every phase of the construction process, including demolition, grading, paving, and building, emits GHGs in volumes directly related to the quantity and type of construction equipment used. GHG emissions associated with each phase of project construction are calculated by multiplying the total fuel consumed by the construction equipment and worker trips by applicable emission factors. The number and pieces of construction equipment are calculated based on the project-specific design.

Construction activities would last for approximately 12 months. For modeling construction emissions, it was assumed construction would begin in late April 2019 and conclude in May 2020. Construction activities would include grading, roadways construction for the tracks, building construction, paving, and architectural coatings. Construction equipment required for the project would include, but would not be limited to, excavators, backhoes, scrapers, graders, trucks, rollers, dozers, and loaders. For the purposes of calculating worst-case emissions, construction of the building, parking lot, skills pad, and all tracks were modeled as occurring simultaneously. Total earthwork during the initial grading is estimated to include the movement of 50,000 cubic yards of soil on-site. It is estimated construction of



the training tracks would require approximately 18,000 cubic yard of road base material and 9,000 cubic yards of asphalt. No off-site improvements are associated with the project.

Heavy-duty construction equipment is usually diesel powered. In general, emissions from diesel-powered equipment contain more NOX, SOX, and particulate matter than gasoline-powered engines. However, diesel-powered engines generally produce less CO and less VOC than do gasoline-powered engines. Equipment emissions are affected by CARB’s In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation (Off-road Regulation), the off-road regulation requires construction fleets to phase out older equipment over time and provide specific dates for when all equipment must comply with various emissions standards, also known as tiers with the highest tier indicating the cleanest technology. Based on County contract requirements for this project, all equipment has been modeled as Tier IV. The construction equipment summarized in Table 4 is anticipated to be used in each phase of the project.

Table 4 Construction Equipment List

Construction Stage Equipment Type Quantity Tier Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 IV Site Preparation Graders 1 IV Site Preparation Crawler Tractor 1 IV Site Preparation Excavators 1 IV Site Preparation Scrapers 1 IV Grading Crawler Tractor 1 IV Grading Excavators 2 IV Grading Scrapers 2 IV Grading Rollers 2 IV Grading Graders 2 IV Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 IV Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 5 IV Road-base Air Compressors 1 IV Road-base Generator Sets 1 IV Road-base Graders 1 IV Road-base Plate Compactor 1 IV Road-base Pumps 1 IV Road-base Rough Terrain Forklift 1 IV Road-base Scrapers 2 IV Road-base Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 IV Building Construction Cranes 1 IV Building Construction Forklifts 2 IV Building Construction Generator Sets 1 IV Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 IV Building Construction Welders 3 IV Paving Pavers 2 IV Paving Paving Equipment 2 IV Paving Rollers 5 IV Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 IV Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 IV Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 IV



Based on guidance from the SCAQMD, total construction GHG emissions resulting from a project should be amortized over 30 years and added to operational GHG emissions to account for their contribution to GHG emissions over the lifetime of a project (SCAQMD 2009). Detailed model inputs are included with the model data sheets in Attachment 1.

3.5.2 Vehicle Emissions GHG emissions from vehicles come from the combustion of fossil fuels in vehicle engines. The vehicle emissions are calculated based on the vehicle type and the trip rate for each land use. The vehicle emission factors and fleet mix used in CalEEMod are derived from CARB’s 2014 Emission Factors Model (EMFAC 2014), which includes GHG reducing effects from the implementation of Pavley I (Clean Car Standards) and the LCFS, and are thus considered in the calculation of standards for project emissions.

The daily trip generation of 676 was taken from the project traffic report and used to develop a size-based metric based on total annual trips (KOA Corporation 2017). However, the traffic report looked only at the maximum daily event where up to 204 people could be on-site. Based on historical training practices, future training needs, safety requirements, as well as logistics, the most common condition would be approximately 67 persons on-site. To determine an annual trip generation, the Sheriff Department has estimated that the maximum event would occur twice a year at most. The normal operation would be 5 days a week, 52 weeks a year. However, due to scheduling conflicts, training may also occur in the evenings and on the weekends. To provide a conservative estimate of total trip generation, it was assumed that nighttime training may occur up to three nights a week and weekend training would occur every Saturday. Nighttime training events would be smaller and have 46 attendees, including instructors. Weekend training events would likely be similar to the evening events, however to be conservative the weekend events were modeled as typical weekday event. The total trip generation was then multiplied by the calculated average trip distance increase from all sheriff facilities to the new EVOC facility vs. the existing EVOC training occurring at Qualcomm Stadium. However, the relocation of the training activities from Qualcomm to the new EVOC facility would require individual sheriff deputies to travel an additional 14.46 miles to attend training activities at the facility. This additional distance was determined by evaluating the location of all sheriff facilities within the County and calculating the difference in distance between traveling to Qualcomm and the new EVOC facility. A set of maps are included in Attachment 2 that depict the locations of sheriff facilities and the existing and proposed EVOC locations. The additional mileage was applied to the trip generation to develop the total vehicle emissions associated with the new EVOC. Tables 5 and 6 summarize the proposed annual trip generation and VMT calculation.



Table 5 Trip Generation

Typical Day People Rate

(Trips per Person) Daily Trips Instructors 8 3.3 26 Staff 2 3.3 7 Students 60 3.3 198 Fuel/Deliveries/Maintenance -- -- 3 Total 70 -- 234

Nighttime People Rate Daily Trips Instructors 4 3.3 13 Staff 2 3.3 7 Students 40 3.3 132 Total 46 -- 152

Peak Day People Rate Daily Trips Instructors 20 3.3 66 Staff 4 3.3 13 Students 180 3.3 594 Fuel/Deliveries/Maintenance -- -- 3 Total 204 -- 676

Table 6 Annual Vehicle Miles Travels Condition Days

Standard Days 260 Weekends 52 Sub-total 312 Nights 104 Peak Days/year 2 Day/Weekend Trips 73,070 Nighttime Trips 15,787 Annual Peak Trips 1,353 Total Annual Trips 90,210 Increase in Distance* 14.46 Total Annual VMT 1,304,442.38 VMT = vehicle miles traveled *This is the distance individuals will travel to the new EVOC site.

3.5.3 Energy Emissions GHGs are emitted as a result of activities in buildings for which electricity and natural gas are used as energy sources. GHGs are emitted during the generation of electricity from fossil fuels off-site in power plants. These emissions are considered indirect but are calculated in association with a building’s operation. Electric power generation accounts for the second largest sector contributing to both inventoried and projected statewide GHG emissions. Combustion of fossil fuel emits criteria pollutants and GHGs directly into the atmosphere. When this occurs in a building, this is considered a direct emissions source



associated with that building. CalEEMod estimates emissions from the direct combustion of natural gas for space and water heating.

CalEEMod estimates GHG emissions from energy use by multiplying average rates of residential and non-residential energy consumption by the quantities of residential units and non-residential square footage entered in the land use module to obtain total projected energy use. This value is then multiplied by electricity and natural gas GHG emission factors applicable to the project location and utility provider.

Building energy use is typically divided into energy consumed by the built environment and energy consumed by uses that are independent of the construction of the building such as plug-in appliances. In California, Title 24 governs energy consumed by the built environment, mechanical systems, and some types of fixed lighting. Non-building energy use, or “plug-in energy use,” can be further subdivided by specific end-use (refrigeration, cooking, office equipment, etc.). Energy demand and efficiency factors through the 2016 Title 24 building code have been included in CalEEMod, version 2016.3.2.

The project would be served by San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E). Therefore, SDG&E’s specific energy-intensity factors (i.e., the amount of CO2, CH4, and N2O per megawatt-hour) are used in the calculations of GHG emissions. The state mandate for renewable energy is 33 percent by 2020. However, the energy-intensity factors included in CalEEMod by default only represent a 10.2 percent procurement of renewable energy (SDG&E 2011). To account for the continuing effects of the RPS through 2020, the energy-intensity factors included in CalEEMod were reduced by 22.8 percent. SDG&E energy intensity factors are shown in Table 7 and included in Attachment 1.

Table 7 San Diego Gas & Electric Intensity Factors

Greenhouse Gas 2009

(lbs/MWh) 2020

(lbs/MWh) Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 720.49 537.56 Methane (CH4) 0.029 0.022 Nitrous Oxide (N2O) 0.006 0.005 SOURCE: SDG&E 2011. lbs = pounds; MWh = megawatt-hour

Based on County Policy G-15 and the County’s Strategic Energy Plan for 2015-2020, specific energy efficiency measures used in the modeling include all electric landscaping equipment, energy star rated equipment (such as ceiling fans and refrigerators), and achieving a 25 percent increase in energy efficiency over the current Title 24. 3.5.4 Area Source Emissions Area sources include GHG emissions that would occur from the use of landscaping equipment. The use of landscape equipment emits GHGs associated with the equipment’s fuel combustion. The landscaping equipment emission values were derived from the 2011 Off-Road Equipment Inventory Model (CARB 2011).



3.5.5 Water and Wastewater Emissions The amount of water used and wastewater generated by a project has indirect GHG emissions associated with it. These emissions are a result of the energy used to supply, distribute, and treat the water and wastewater. For CEQA purposes, the reported water and wastewater emissions do not include biogenic emissions. In addition to the indirect GHG emissions associated with energy use, wastewater treatment can directly emit both CH4 and N2O.

The initial calculations for indoor and outdoor water use data for each land use subtype come from the Pacific Institute’s Waste Not, Want Not: The Potential for Urban Water Conservation in California 2003 (as cited in CAPCOA 2017). Based on that report, a percentage of total water consumption was dedicated to landscape irrigation, which is used to determine outdoor water use. Wastewater generation was similarly based on a reported percentage of total indoor water use (CAPCOA 2017).

The project would be subject to CALGreen, which requires a 20 percent increase in indoor water use efficiency. In addition, County Policy G-15 requires a reduction in potable water use by 25 percent. Thus, in order to demonstrate compliance with these requirements, a 25 percent reduction in indoor water use was included in the water consumption calculations for the project.

The project includes several outdoor water reduction measures including xeriscape planting and installing weather- or soil moisture-based automatic irrigation system controllers and provision of outdoor water from an existing on-site well. These design features are estimated to achieve at least a 25 percent reduction in outdoor water use.

In addition to water reductions, the GHG emissions from the energy used to transport the water are affected by RPS.

3.5.6 Solid Waste Emissions The disposal of solid waste produces GHG emissions from anaerobic decomposition in landfills, incineration, and transportation of waste. For CEQA purposes, the reported solid waste emissions do not include biogenic emissions. To calculate the GHG emissions generated by disposing of solid waste for the project, the total volume of solid waste was calculated using waste disposal rates identified by CalRecycle. The methods for quantifying GHG emissions from solid waste are based on the IPCC method, using the degradable organic content of waste. GHG emissions associated with the project’s waste disposal were calculated using these parameters. According to a CalRecyle report to the Legislature, as of 2013 California has achieved a statewide 50 percent diversion of solid waste from landfills through “reduce/recycle/compost” programs (CalRecycle 2013). However, Assembly Bill 341 mandates that 75 percent of the solid waste generated be reduced, recycled, or composted by 2020. Therefore, to account for the continuing actions of recycling requirements under state law (i.e., Assembly Bill 341), a 25 percent solid waste diversion rate was included in the model.



3.5.7 GHG Emissions Modeling Summary Table 8 provides a summary of the calculation methodology for each emission source calculated.

Table 8 Summary of GHG Emission Calculation Methodology

Source Phase I

Construction

Construction equipment was assumed to be a minimum of Tier IV compliant under CARB’s In-Use Off-Road Diesel-Fueled Fleets Regulation. Construction emissions were amortized over 30 years and added to operational emissions.

Vehicles Vehicle emissions were calculated using vehicle emission factors for year 2020. Total annual trips and VMT are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.

Energy

The project would use energy star rated ceiling fans and refrigerators. To comply with Policy G-15, the project would also achieve a 20 percent increase in energy efficiency over the current Title 24, Part 6. To account for the effects of RPS through 2020, the SDG&E energy-intensity factors included in CalEEMod were reduced by 22.8 percent.

Area Area-source emissions were calculated with all electric landscaping equipment. The project would not include woodstoves or fireplaces.

Water A 25 percent decrease in water use was included in the water consumption calculations in accordance with Title 24, Part 11, CalGreen standards and County Policy G-15.

Solid Waste

Emissions were calculated using standard generation rates and emission factors, which are based on California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery waste generation rates. To account for the continuing actions of recycling requirements under state law (i.e., Assembly Bill 341), a 25 percent solid waste diversion rate was included in the modeled.

VMT = vehicle miles traveled RPS = Renewables Portfolio Standard CalEEMod = California Emissions Estimator Model CalGreen = California Green Building Standards Code

4.0 GHG Emissions Quantification 4.1 Carbon Sequestration Loss Based on the size and type of the existing vegetation community, the project would not result in any carbon sequestration loss as the site would be rough graded prior to the project applicant obtaining control of the project, which was analyzed as part of the EOMSP EIR.

4.2 Construction GHG Emissions Based on the construction time frame and the type and size of the proposed land use, the proposed project would generate a total of approximately 1,116 MT CO2e over the entire



construction period. Total annual and amortized construction emissions are presented in Table 9.

Table 9 Summary of Construction Emissions (MT CO2e)

Construction Phase Total Emissions Amortization Period Amortized Emissions

2019 645.2 30 years

21.5 2020 470.3 15.7 Total 1,115.5 37.2

As construction emissions are finite in time, i.e., when construction ends, so do construction-related GHG emissions, no additional construction emissions would be associated with future conditions. The amortized construction emissions are added to the annual operational emissions.

4.3 Operational GHG Emissions Based on the methodology summarized in Section 3.5, the primary sources of direct and indirect GHG emissions have been calculated. Table 10 summarizes the operational emissions associated with the proposed project. Additionally, Table 10 includes a summation of operational emissions and amortized GHG emissions associated with construction.

Table 10 Operational GHG Emissions in 2020

(MT CO2e) Source MT CO2e

Area <1 Energy 212 Vehicles 515 Solid Waste 18 Water 46 Subtotal 791 Amortized Construction 44 Total Gross Emissions 834 MT CO2e = metric tons carbon monoxide equivalent



5.0 Recommended Project Design Features, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures

5.1 Project Design Features The proposed project would be designed and constructed with the goal of obtaining LEED certification. To achieve this and based on County Policy G-15, the proposed project would implement the following project design features:

PDF-1. As required by Policy G-15, the project will be designed to achieve a 20 percent increase in energy efficiency over the current Title 24, Part 6 requirements (County of San Diego 2016).

PDF-2. As required by the 2015-2020 Strategic Energy Plan, the project will be designed to achieve a 25 percent reduction in indoor water use (County of San Diego 2015).

PDF-3. The proposed project will include outdoor water reduction measures, including but not limited to xeriscape planting, weather- or soil moisture-based automatic irrigation system controllers, or provision of outdoor water from a non-potable source. These features are estimated to achieve at least a 25 percent reduction in outdoor water use.

PDF-4. The proposed project will install U.S. EPA’s Energy Star-rated fans and appliances, as applicable.

PDF-5. The proposed project will minimize site lighting to only that necessary for security, safety, and identification and the tracks would not have lights. The proposed project would increase the use of low-voltage lighting and equipment.

PDF-6. The project contract language will include a requirement for all equipment to meet or exceed EPA Tier IV Final air emissions standards.

5.2 Impacts 5.2.1 GHG Emissions The first criterion identified in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines indicates that implementation of the proposed project would have significant environmental impacts on global climate change if it would generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.

As discussed in Section 3.0, the County has not adopted a threshold of significance for general use as part of its environmental review process. This analysis uses a screening level



of 900 MT CO2e that was adapted from the CAPCOA report CEQA & Climate Change. This screening level is based upon a 90 percent emissions market capture rate.

As shown in Table 10, the proposed project would result in the equivalent annual emission of 835 MT CO2e. As annual emissions do not exceed 900 MT CO2e, the proposed project would not conflict with the state reduction targets and emissions would therefore be less than cumulatively considerable. Impacts would be less than significant.

5.2.2 Plan, Policy, and Regulatory Conflicts The second criterion identified in Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines indicates that implementation of the proposed project would have significant environmental impacts on global climate change if it would conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of GHGs. As discussed in Section 2.0, numerous local, state, and federal plans, policies, and regulations have been adopted for the purpose of reducing the GHG emissions. As the proposed project includes land use development that is anticipated to be complete and in operation by 2020, conformity with state reduction targets codified by AB 32 and conformity with the County of San Diego General Plan policies are assessed.

5.2.2.1 State Scoping Plan and Reduction Targets—EO S-3-05, AB 32, EO B-30-15, and SB 32

EO S-3-05 established the following GHG emission reduction targets for the state of California:

• by 2010, reduce GHG emissions to 2000 levels; • by 2020, reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels; • by 2050, reduce GHG emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels.

AB 32 codified the 2020 goal of EO S-3-05 and launched the Climate Change Scoping Plan that outlined the reduction measures needed to reach this target. EO B-30-15 established an additional interim GHG emission reduction goal for the state of California by 2030 of 40 percent below 1990 levels.

• by 2030, reduce GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels.

SB 32 codified the 2030 goal of EO B-30-15 and called for revision of the Climate Change Scoping Plan to outline the reduction measures needed to reach this target.

The 900 MT CO2e threshold identified by CAPCOA identifies small projects with emissions that would result in less than cumulatively significant impacts to achievement of state reduction targets. CAPCOA guidance indicates that projects that meet the 900 MT CO2e would be consistent with state reduction targets identified by AB 32.



While the project is anticipated to be constructed and operational by 2020, project emissions would decline beyond 2020 as a result of continued implementation of federal, state, and local reduction measures such as increased federal and state vehicle efficiency standards, and SDG&E’s increased renewable sources of energy in accordance with RPS goals. Based on currently available models and regulatory forecasting, project emissions would continue to decline from 2020 through at least 2050. Given the reasonably anticipated decline in project emissions once fully constructed and operational, the project is in line with the GHG reductions needed to achieve the 2030 GHG emission reduction targets identified by EO B-30-15 and SB 32.

The annual emissions of the project do not exceed 900 MT CO2e, the proposed project would not conflict with the state Scoping Plan or the achievement of state reduction goals codified by AB 32, and the annual emissions of the project would continue to decline after 2020 and thus would not conflict with the achievement of state reduction goals identified and codified by B-30-15 and SB 32. Impacts would be less than significant.

5.2.2.2 General Plan

The Conservation and Open Space Element of the County’s General Plan includes policies intended to reduce GHG emissions through sustainable land development, architecture and buildings, mobility, solid waste management, energy, water supply. Project consistency with these policies is assessed in Table 11. It should be noted that several of the policies identified in Table 11 are beyond the scope of individual land use projects. All policies related to sustainability are included for disclosure, regardless of whether or not the proposed project could reasonably conflict with the policy.

As shown in Table 11, the proposed project would not conflict with policies outlined in the Conservation and Open Space Element of the County’s General Plan. Impacts would be less than significant.

Table 11 Project Consistency with County General Plan Policies

Policy Policy Description Project Consistency

COS-14.1

Land Use Development Form. Require that development be located and designed to reduce vehicular trips (and associated air pollution) by utilizing compact regional and community-level development patterns while maintaining community character.

The project would be located in the existing EOMSP area and would be located near industrial land uses. Due to the unique nature of the EVOC as a land use, it is considered compatible with the community character. By locating the EVOC in the County, the Sheriff Department is reducing the future trips associated with the next nearest options, which are outside the County.

COS-14.2

Villages and Rural Villages. Incorporate a mixture of uses within Villages and Rural Villages that encourage people to walk, bicycle, or use public transit to reduce air pollution and GHG emissions.

The project is not located within Villages and Rural Villages; thus, the project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.





COS-14.3

Sustainable Development. Require design of residential subdivisions and nonresidential development through “green” and sustainable land development practices to conserve energy, water, open space, and natural resources.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes “green” and sustainable land requirements as well as requirements to conserve energy, water, and natural resources. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-14.4

Sustainable Technology and Projects. Require technologies and projects that contribute to the conservation of resources in a sustainable manner, that are compatible with community character, and that increase the self-sufficiency of individual communities, residents, and businesses.

The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-14.5

Building Siting and Orientation in Subdivisions. Require that buildings be located and oriented in new subdivisions and multi-structure non-residential projects to maximize passive solar heating during cool seasons, minimize heat gains during hot periods, enhance natural ventilation, and promote the effective use of daylight.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes technology requirements for all new county buildings, which include cool roofs. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-14.6

Solar Access for Infill Development. Require that property setbacks and building massing of new construction located within existing developed areas maintain an envelope that maximizes solar access to the extent feasible.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes site design requirements for inclusion of renewable energy systems.

COS-14.7

Alternative Energy Sources for Development Projects. Encourage development projects that use energy recovery, photovoltaic, and wind energy.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes site design requirements for inclusion of renewable energy systems.

COS-14.8

Minimize Air Pollution. Minimize land use conflicts that expose people to significant amounts of air pollutants.


COS-14.9

Significant Producers of Air Pollutants. Require projects that generate potentially significant levels of air pollutants and/or GHGs such as quarries, landfill operations, or large land development projects to incorporate renewable energy, and the best available control technologies and practices into the project design.


COS-14.10

Low-Emission Construction Vehicles and Equipment. Require County contractors and encourage other developers to use low-emission construction vehicles and equipment to improve air quality and reduce GHG emissions.

Project construction equipment is regulated by the U.S. EPA non-road diesel engine standards. Additionally, the project would include requirements for all construction equipment to achieve emission reduction equal to EPA Tier IV emission standards for all construction equipment in contract language. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.





COS-14.11

Native Vegetation. Require development to minimize the vegetation management of native vegetation while ensuring sufficient clearing is provided for fire control.

The project would include limited vegetation management. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-14.12

Heat Island Effect. Require that development be located and designed to minimize the “heat island” effect as appropriate to the location and density of development, incorporating such elements as cool roofs, cool pavements, and strategically placed shade trees.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes technology requirements for all new county buildings, which include cool roofs. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-14.13

Incentives for Sustainable and Low GHG Development. Provide incentives such as expedited project review and entitlement processing for developers that maximize use of sustainable and low GHG land development practices in exceedance of State and local standards.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes sustainability requirements for all new county buildings. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-15.1

Design and Construction of New Buildings. Require that new buildings be designed and constructed in accordance with “green building” programs that incorporate techniques and materials that maximize energy efficiency, incorporate the use of sustainable resources and recycled materials, and reduce emissions of GHGs and toxic air contaminants.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes LEED certification. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-15.2

Upgrade of Existing Buildings. Promote and, as appropriate, develop standards for the retrofit of existing buildings to incorporate design elements, heating and cooling, water, energy, and other elements that improve their environmental sustainability and reduce GHG.

Not applicable.

COS-15.3

Green Building Programs. Require all new County facilities and the renovation and expansion of existing County buildings to meet identified “green building” programs that demonstrate energy efficiency, energy conservation, and renewable technologies.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes Green building requirements for all new County buildings. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-15.4 Title 24 Energy Standards. Require development to minimize energy impacts from new buildings in accordance with or exceeding Title 24 energy standards.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes an energy efficiency requirement for all new county buildings to achieve an increase of 25 percent over current Title 24 energy standards. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-15.5

Energy Efficiency Audits. Encourage energy conservation and efficiency in existing development through energy efficiency audits and adoption of energy saving measures resulting from the audits.

Not applicable.





COS-15.6 Design and Construction Methods. Require development design and construction methods to minimize impacts to air quality.


COS-16.1

Alternative Transportation Modes. Work with SANDAG and local transportation agencies to expand opportunities for transit use. Support the development of alternative transportation modes, as provided by Mobility Element policies.


COS-16.2 Single-Occupancy Vehicles. Support transportation management programs that reduce the use of single-occupancy vehicles.


COS-16.3

Low-Emissions Vehicles and Equipment. Require County operations and encourage private development to provide incentives (such as priority parking) for the use of low- and zero-emission vehicles and equipment to improve air quality and reduce GHG emissions.

The project would use newer vehicles for training, but would be required to use the same vehicles as used in service. The project would comply with County parking requirements in the provision of prioritized clean-air parking. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-16.4

Alternative Fuel Sources. Explore the potential of developing alternative fuel stations at maintenance yards and other County facilities for the municipal fleet and general public.


COS-16.5 Transit-Center Development. Encourage compact development patterns along major transit routes.


COS-17.1

Reduction of Solid Waste Materials. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and future landfill capacity needs through reduction, reuse, or recycling of all types of solid waste that is generated. Divert solid waste from landfills in compliance with State law.

The proposed project would comply with Construction and Demolition Debris Ordinance, which requires that 90 percent of inerts and 70 percent of all other construction materials from a project be recycled.

COS-17.2 Construction and Demolition Waste. Require recycling, reduction and reuse of construction and demolition debris.

COS-17.3

Landfill Waste Management. Require landfills to use waste management and disposal techniques and practices to meet all applicable environmental standards.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes recycling requirement for all new county buildings. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-17.4

Composting. Encourage composting throughout the County and minimize the amount of organic materials disposed at landfills.


COS-17.5

Methane Recapture. Promote efficient methods for methane recapture in landfills and the use of composting facilities and anaerobic digesters and other sustainable strategies to reduce the release of GHG emissions from waste disposal or management sites and to generate additional energy such as electricity.






COS-17.6 Recycling Containers. Require that all new land development projects include space for recycling containers.


COS-17.7 Material Recovery Program. Improve the County’s rate of recycling by expanding solid waste recycling programs for residential and non-residential uses.


COS-17.8 Education. Continue programs to educate industry and the public regarding the need and methods for waste reduction, recycling, and reuse.


COS-18.1

Alternate Energy Systems Design. Work with San Diego Gas and Electric and non-utility developers to facilitate the development of alternative energy systems that are located and designed to maintain the character of their setting.


COS-18.2

Energy Generation from Waste. Encourage use of methane sequestration and other sustainable strategies to produce energy and/or reduce GHG emissions from waste disposal or management sites.


COS-18.3

Alternate Energy Systems Impacts. Require alternative energy system operators to properly design and maintain these systems to minimize adverse impacts to the environment.


COS-19.1 Sustainable Development Practices. Require land development, building design, landscaping, and operational practices that minimize water consumption.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes requirement for all new county buildings to reduce potable water use as well as landscaping and exterior water use requirements. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

COS-19.2

Recycled Water in New Development. Require the use of recycled water in development wherever feasible. Restrict the use of recycled water when it increases salt loading in reservoirs.

The project would be consistent with County Policy G-15, which includes requirement for all new county buildings to reduce potable water use as well as landscaping and exterior water use requirements. The proposed project would not conflict with implementation of the policy.

EOMSP = East Otay Mesa Specific Plan EVOC = Emergency Vehicle Operations Course



5.3 Mitigation Measures This project’s potential to result in impacts to global climate change was assessed based on the 900 MT CO2e screening threshold identified by the CAPCOA. The 900 MT CO2e is used to determine if project emissions have the potential to impact the environment or the State’s achievement of GHG reduction targets. As shown in Table 10, construction and operation of the proposed project would result in the equivalent annual emission of 835 MT CO2e. As annual emissions do not exceed 900 MT CO2e, the proposed project’s impact on global climate change would therefore be less than cumulatively considerable. Additionally, as shown in Table 11, the project would be consistent with all applicable policies from the County’s General Plan Open Space and Conservation Element. Therefore, the project would not conflict with applicable plans, policies or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Impacts global climate change would be less than significant. No mitigation would be required.

6.0 References California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA) 2008 CEQA & Climate Change, Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emission

from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. January. 2017 California Emissions Estimator model (CalEEMod). User’s Guide Version 2016.3.2

October California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2007 California GHG Inventory. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/archive/tables/

ghg_inventory_ipcc_90_04_sum_2007-11-19.pdf Accessed April, 2014. 2011 Off-Road Equipment Inventory Model. 2014 First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan: Building on the Framework.

May. 2016 California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000–2014 - by Category as Defined in

the 2008 Scoping Plan. Last updated March 30. 2017 The 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan Update, The Proposed Strategy for

Achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target. January 20. California Climate Change Center 2006 Our Changing Climate Assessing the Risks to California, A Summary Report from

the California Climate Change Center. July.



California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) 2013 Update on AB 341 Legislative Report: Statewide Strategies to Achieve the 75

Percent Goal by 2020, October. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) 2013 California’s Zero Net Energy Policies and Initiatives, accessed at

http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/C27FC108-A1FD-4D67-AA59-7EA82011B257/0/3.pdf. Sept. 18, 2013.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2014 Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. KOA Corporation

2017 Memorandum: Emergency Vehicle Operations Course Traffic Study Trip Generation Review, October 30.

Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) 2016 Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0, May 19. San Diego, County of 2007 County Code of Regulatory Ordinances, Sections 68.508 through 68.518, Diversion

of Construction and Demolition Materials from Landfill Disposal, March 21, available at http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/common_ components/images/dpw/recyclingpdfs/FinalCDord.pdf.

2011 San Diego County General Plan, August, available at

http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/sdc/pds/generalplan.html. 2015 2015-2020 Strategic Energy Plan, available at

http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/dgs/Doc/Energy_StrategicEnergyPlan.pdf.

2016 Policy Number G-15, Design Standards for County Facilities and Property,

November 15, available at http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/cob/docs/policy/G-15.pdf.

2017 The Green Building Program, accessed November 2, available at

http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/pds/greenbuildings.html. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 2015 San Diego Forward, accessed November 5, 2015, available at

http://www.sdforward.com/. San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) 2011 March 2011 Semi-Annual Compliance Report Pursuant to the California

Renewables Portfolio Standard. Filed March.



San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) 2009 Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for

New Projects under CEQA. December 17. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2008 Interim CEQA GHG Significance Thresholds for Stationary Sources, Rules and

Plans. Board Meeting Date December 5, 2008. Agenda No. 31. 2009 Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group 14.

November 19, 2009. University of San Diego 2013 San Diego County Updated Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Prepared by the University

of San Diego School of Law, Energy Policy Initiative Center (EPIC), and available online at http://www.sandiego.edu/law/centers/epic/reports-papers/reports.php. March.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) 2007 U.S. Climate Policy and Actions. Obtained from the EPA Climate Change website

at http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/policy/index.html on May 25, 2007.

7.0 List of Preparers and Persons and Organizations Contacted

The following personnel contributed to the preparation of this technical report.

Michael Page Principal William Maddux County-approved Consultant – Air Quality Jesse Fleming Senior Air Quality and GHG Specialist Jack Emerson Air Quality and GHG Specialist Stacey Higgins Senior Production Specialist Frank McDermott Senior GIS Specialist


Emergency Vehicle Operations Course Project

ATTACHMENT 1 Modeling Input and Output

Project Characteristics - RPS through 2020

Land Use - Track modeled in Road construction model.

Construction Phase - Based on approximate 12 Month Schedule paving and painting would require 30 working days.

Off-road Equipment - No changes

Off-road Equipment - Reduced Construction Phases increased equipment

Off-road Equipment - No Change


1.1 Land Usage

Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population

Government Office Building 50.00 1000sqft 1.15 50,000.00 0

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 10.00 1000sqft 0.23 10,000.00 0

Other Asphalt Surfaces 3.20 Acre 3.20 139,392.00 0

Parking Lot 170.00 Space 1.53 68,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics

Urbanization

Climate Zone

Urban

13

Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.6 40

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics

Utility Company San Diego Gas & Electric

2021Operational Year

CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

537.56 0.022CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr)

0.005N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr)

San Diego County - EVOC _ GHGSan Diego County APCD Air District, Annual

CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 12/8/2017 12:15 PMPage 1 of 36

San Diego County - EVOC _ GHG - San Diego County APCD Air District, Annual



Trips and VMT - Hauling zeroed as no import or export would occur

Grading - No Import/Export 50,000 cubic foot on-site earthwork

Architectural Coating - SDAPCD Rule 67.0.1 Requires Reductions in most coatings, a reduction of 100 g/l was applied to account for this on all but parking paints.

Vehicle Trips - Trip charcteristics modified to account for total annual VMT of 1,304,442

Vehicle Emission Factors -



Area Coating - SDAPCD Rule 67.0.1

Energy Use - The track will not be lit. Garages will not have natual gas

Water And Wastewater - No water would be supplied in the garage buildings.

Solid Waste - The garages are not solid waste sources.

Land Use Change - No change the land has been graded prior to the project.

Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - County will require Tier 4 equipment as part of the contract language.

Area Mitigation -

Energy Mitigation - 2015-2020

Water Mitigation - Title 24, Part 11, CalGreen , Current state and County water policies a 25% reduction was applied to indoor and outdoor water demand to account for these regulations.

Waste Mitigation - AB 341 Requirements for non-residential uses and County policies for reycling.

Operational Off-Road Equipment -

Fleet Mix -

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value

tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 150.00

tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 150.00

tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00














tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 4 Final












tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00

tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00

tblEnergyUse NT24NG 0.11 0.00

tblEnergyUse T24NG 1.56 0.00

tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 25,000.00



tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 25,000.00

tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.022

tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 720.49 537.56

tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.005

tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 9.40 0.00

tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 3,125.00 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CC_TL 7.30 0.00




tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 62.00 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL 7.30 0.00




tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 5.00 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 41.00 0.00

tblVehicleTrips CW_TL 9.50 14.46




tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 100.00

tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 59.00 0.00

tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 34.00 0.00

tblVehicleTrips DV_TP 5.00 0.00

tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 16.00 0.00

tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 3.00 0.00



2.0 Emissions Summary

tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 50.00 100.00

tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 92.00 0.00

tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.68 0.00

tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.68 0.00

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 68.93 6.94

tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.68 0.00

tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 2,312,500.00 0.00



2.1 Overall Construction

ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10

Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Year tons/yr MT/yr

2019 0.2681 2.4911 1.8810 4.0200e-003

0.2458 0.1240 0.3698 0.1073 0.1161 0.2234 0.0000 363.1104 363.1104 0.0648 0.0000 364.7298

2020 0.6327 1.2542 1.1350 2.4000e-003

0.0521 0.0606 0.1127 0.0141 0.0569 0.0710 0.0000 214.2739 214.2739 0.0382 0.0000 215.2299

Maximum 0.6327 2.4911 1.8810 4.0200e-003

0.2458 0.1240 0.3698 0.1073 0.1161 0.2234 0.0000 363.1104 363.1104 0.0648 0.0000 364.7298

Unmitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Year tons/yr MT/yr

2019 0.0772 0.6205 1.9114 4.0200e-003

0.1582 7.0800e-003

0.1653 0.0612 6.9200e-003

0.0681 0.0000 363.1101 363.1101 0.0648 0.0000 364.7295

2020 0.5390 0.3346 1.2001 2.4000e-003

0.0521 3.6200e-003

0.0557 0.0141 3.5500e-003

0.0177 0.0000 214.2737 214.2737 0.0382 0.0000 215.2297

Maximum 0.5390 0.6205 1.9114 4.0200e-003

0.1582 7.0800e-003

0.1653 0.0612 6.9200e-003

0.0681 0.0000 363.1101 363.1101 0.0648 0.0000 364.7295

Mitigated Construction


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

31.60 74.50 -3.17 0.00 29.42 94.20 54.22 37.99 93.95 70.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



2.2 Overall Operational


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Category tons/yr MT/yr

Area 0.3247 2.0000e-005

2.1500e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.1700e-003

4.1700e-003

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.4400e-003

Energy 5.4400e-003

0.0495 0.0416 3.0000e-004

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

0.0000 232.4298 232.4298 8.3400e-003

2.6500e-003

233.4275

Mobile 0.1031 0.5078 1.5140 5.5800e-003

0.4917 4.6400e-003

0.4963 0.1317 4.3400e-003

0.1360 0.0000 514.4434 514.4434 0.0255 0.0000 515.0808

Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.4391 0.0000 9.4391 0.5578 0.0000 23.3849

Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.1513 48.0289 51.1802 0.3256 8.0900e-003

61.7316

Total 0.4332 0.5573 1.5577 5.8800e-003

0.4917 8.4100e-003

0.5001 0.1317 8.1100e-003

0.1398 12.5904 794.9062 807.4966 0.9173 0.0107 833.6293

Unmitigated Operational

Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)

1 4-29-2019 7-28-2019 1.0677 0.1942

2 7-29-2019 10-28-2019 0.9806 0.2946

3 10-29-2019 1-28-2020 0.9556 0.2909

4 1-29-2020 4-28-2020 1.5667 0.7601

Highest 1.5667 0.7601



2.2 Overall Operational


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Area 0.3247 2.0000e-005

2.1500e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.1700e-003

4.1700e-003

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.4400e-003

Energy 4.5800e-003

0.0417 0.0350 2.5000e-004

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

0.0000 210.7701 210.7701 7.6400e-003

2.3700e-003

211.6674

Mobile 0.1031 0.5078 1.5140 5.5800e-003

0.4917 4.6400e-003

0.4963 0.1317 4.3400e-003

0.1360 0.0000 514.4434 514.4434 0.0255 0.0000 515.0808

Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.0793 0.0000 7.0793 0.4184 0.0000 17.5387

Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.3635 36.0217 38.3852 0.2442 6.0700e-003

46.2987

Total 0.4323 0.5494 1.5511 5.8300e-003

0.4917 7.8200e-003

0.4995 0.1317 7.5200e-003

0.1392 9.4428 761.2394 770.6821 0.6958 8.4400e-003

790.5900

Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail

Construction Phase


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total

Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e

Percent Reduction

0.20 1.41 0.42 0.85 0.00 7.02 0.12 0.00 7.27 0.42 25.00 4.24 4.56 24.15 21.42 5.16



Phase Number

Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week

Num Days Phase Description

1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 4/29/2019 5/10/2019 5 10

2 Grading Grading 5/11/2019 6/7/2019 5 20

3 Building Construction Building Construction 6/8/2019 4/24/2020 5 230

4 Paving Paving 3/16/2020 4/24/2020 5 30

5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/16/2020 4/24/2020 5 30

OffRoad Equipment

Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 90,000; Non-Residential Outdoor: 30,000; Striped Parking Area: 12,444 (Architectural Coating – sqft)

Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0

Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 10

Acres of Paving: 4.73



3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor

Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40

Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37

Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38

Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41

Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40

Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37

Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29

Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20

Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74

Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37

Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45

Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42

Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36

Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38

Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48

Trips and VMT

Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count

Worker Trip Number

Vendor Trip Number

Hauling Trip Number

Worker Trip Length

Vendor Trip Length

Hauling Trip Length

Worker Vehicle Class

Vendor Vehicle Class

Hauling Vehicle Class

Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Building Construction 9 107.00 44.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT

Architectural Coating 1 21.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT



3.2 Site Preparation - 2019


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0903 0.0000 0.0903 0.0497 0.0000 0.0497 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0217 0.2279 0.1103 1.9000e-004

0.0120 0.0120 0.0110 0.0110 0.0000 17.0843 17.0843 5.4100e-003

0.0000 17.2195

Total 0.0217 0.2279 0.1103 1.9000e-004

0.0903 0.0120 0.1023 0.0497 0.0110 0.0607 0.0000 17.0843 17.0843 5.4100e-003

0.0000 17.2195

Unmitigated Construction On-Site

Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment

Water Exposed Area





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 3.5000e-004

2.7000e-004

2.6300e-003

1.0000e-005

7.2000e-004

1.0000e-005

7.3000e-004

1.9000e-004

0.0000 2.0000e-004

0.0000 0.6737 0.6737 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.6742

Total 3.5000e-004

2.7000e-004

2.6300e-003

1.0000e-005

7.2000e-004

1.0000e-005

7.3000e-004

1.9000e-004

0.0000 2.0000e-004

0.0000 0.6737 0.6737 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.6742

Unmitigated Construction Off-Site


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0407 0.0000 0.0407 0.0223 0.0000 0.0223 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 2.3300e-003

0.0101 0.1043 1.9000e-004

3.1000e-004

3.1000e-004

3.1000e-004

3.1000e-004

0.0000 17.0843 17.0843 5.4100e-003

0.0000 17.2195

Total 2.3300e-003

0.0101 0.1043 1.9000e-004

0.0407 3.1000e-004

0.0410 0.0223 3.1000e-004

0.0227 0.0000 17.0843 17.0843 5.4100e-003

0.0000 17.2195

Mitigated Construction On-Site





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 3.5000e-004

2.7000e-004

2.6300e-003

1.0000e-005

7.2000e-004

1.0000e-005

7.3000e-004

1.9000e-004

0.0000 2.0000e-004

0.0000 0.6737 0.6737 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.6742

Total 3.5000e-004

2.7000e-004

2.6300e-003

1.0000e-005

7.2000e-004

1.0000e-005

7.3000e-004

1.9000e-004

0.0000 2.0000e-004

0.0000 0.6737 0.6737 2.0000e-005

0.0000 0.6742

Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Grading - 2019


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0690 0.0000 0.0690 0.0342 0.0000 0.0342 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Off-Road 0.0258 0.2835 0.1629 3.0000e-004

0.0140 0.0140 0.0129 0.0129 0.0000 26.6423 26.6423 8.4300e-003

0.0000 26.8530

Total 0.0258 0.2835 0.1629 3.0000e-004

0.0690 0.0140 0.0830 0.0342 0.0129 0.0471 0.0000 26.6423 26.6423 8.4300e-003

0.0000 26.8530




3.3 Grading - 2019


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 5.9000e-004

4.5000e-004

4.3900e-003

1.0000e-005

1.2000e-003

1.0000e-005

1.2100e-003

3.2000e-004

1.0000e-005

3.3000e-004

0.0000 1.1227 1.1227 4.0000e-005

0.0000 1.1237

Total 5.9000e-004

4.5000e-004

4.3900e-003

1.0000e-005

1.2000e-003

1.0000e-005

1.2100e-003

3.2000e-004

1.0000e-005

3.3000e-004

0.0000 1.1227 1.1227 4.0000e-005

0.0000 1.1237



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Fugitive Dust 0.0311 0.0000 0.0311 0.0154 0.0000 0.0154 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0157 0.1775 3.0000e-004

4.8000e-004

4.8000e-004

4.8000e-004

4.8000e-004

0.0000 26.6422 26.6422 8.4300e-003

0.0000 26.8530

Total 3.6300e-003

0.0157 0.1775 3.0000e-004

0.0311 4.8000e-004

0.0316 0.0154 4.8000e-004

0.0159 0.0000 26.6422 26.6422 8.4300e-003

0.0000 26.8530




3.3 Grading - 2019


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 5.9000e-004

4.5000e-004

4.3900e-003

1.0000e-005

1.2000e-003

1.0000e-005

1.2100e-003

3.2000e-004

1.0000e-005

3.3000e-004

0.0000 1.1227 1.1227 4.0000e-005

0.0000 1.1237

Total 5.9000e-004

4.5000e-004

4.3900e-003

1.0000e-005

1.2000e-003

1.0000e-005

1.2100e-003

3.2000e-004

1.0000e-005

3.3000e-004

0.0000 1.1227 1.1227 4.0000e-005

0.0000 1.1237


3.4 Building Construction - 2019


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.1736 1.5493 1.2615 1.9800e-003

0.0948 0.0948 0.0891 0.0891 0.0000 172.8016 172.8016 0.0421 0.0000 173.8540

Total 0.1736 1.5493 1.2615 1.9800e-003

0.0948 0.0948 0.0891 0.0891 0.0000 172.8016 172.8016 0.0421 0.0000 173.8540






Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0152 0.4059 0.1091 8.8000e-004

0.0215 2.8100e-003

0.0243 6.2000e-003

2.6900e-003

8.8900e-003

0.0000 85.9203 85.9203 6.9000e-003

0.0000 86.0926

Worker 0.0310 0.0238 0.2301 6.5000e-004

0.0631 4.6000e-004

0.0635 0.0168 4.2000e-004

0.0172 0.0000 58.8655 58.8655 1.8900e-003

0.0000 58.9128

Total 0.0462 0.4297 0.3392 1.5300e-003

0.0845 3.2700e-003

0.0878 0.0230 3.1100e-003

0.0261 0.0000 144.7858 144.7858 8.7900e-003

0.0000 145.0055



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.0241 0.1643 1.2833 1.9800e-003

3.0000e-003

3.0000e-003

3.0000e-003

3.0000e-003

0.0000 172.8014 172.8014 0.0421 0.0000 173.8538

Total 0.0241 0.1643 1.2833 1.9800e-003

3.0000e-003

3.0000e-003

3.0000e-003

3.0000e-003

0.0000 172.8014 172.8014 0.0421 0.0000 173.8538






Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0152 0.4059 0.1091 8.8000e-004

0.0215 2.8100e-003

0.0243 6.2000e-003

2.6900e-003

8.8900e-003

0.0000 85.9203 85.9203 6.9000e-003

0.0000 86.0926

Worker 0.0310 0.0238 0.2301 6.5000e-004

0.0631 4.6000e-004

0.0635 0.0168 4.2000e-004

0.0172 0.0000 58.8655 58.8655 1.8900e-003

0.0000 58.9128

Total 0.0462 0.4297 0.3392 1.5300e-003

0.0845 3.2700e-003

0.0878 0.0230 3.1100e-003

0.0261 0.0000 144.7858 144.7858 8.7900e-003

0.0000 145.0055




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.0880 0.7962 0.6992 1.1200e-003

0.0464 0.0464 0.0436 0.0436 0.0000 96.1181 96.1181 0.0235 0.0000 96.7044

Total 0.0880 0.7962 0.6992 1.1200e-003

0.0464 0.0464 0.0436 0.0436 0.0000 96.1181 96.1181 0.0235 0.0000 96.7044






Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 6.9600e-003

0.2081 0.0553 4.9000e-004

0.0121 1.0200e-003

0.0131 3.5000e-003

9.7000e-004

4.4700e-003

0.0000 48.1811 48.1811 3.6900e-003

0.0000 48.2734

Worker 0.0164 0.0121 0.1188 3.6000e-004

0.0356 2.6000e-004

0.0359 9.4600e-003

2.4000e-004

9.7000e-003

0.0000 32.1881 32.1881 9.7000e-004

0.0000 32.2123

Total 0.0233 0.2203 0.1741 8.5000e-004

0.0477 1.2800e-003

0.0490 0.0130 1.2100e-003

0.0142 0.0000 80.3692 80.3692 4.6600e-003

0.0000 80.4857



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.0136 0.0927 0.7246 1.1200e-003

1.6900e-003

1.6900e-003

1.6900e-003

1.6900e-003

0.0000 96.1180 96.1180 0.0235 0.0000 96.7043

Total 0.0136 0.0927 0.7246 1.1200e-003

1.6900e-003

1.6900e-003

1.6900e-003

1.6900e-003

0.0000 96.1180 96.1180 0.0235 0.0000 96.7043






Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 6.9600e-003

0.2081 0.0553 4.9000e-004

0.0121 1.0200e-003

0.0131 3.5000e-003

9.7000e-004

4.4700e-003

0.0000 48.1811 48.1811 3.6900e-003

0.0000 48.2734

Worker 0.0164 0.0121 0.1188 3.6000e-004

0.0356 2.6000e-004

0.0359 9.4600e-003

2.4000e-004

9.7000e-003

0.0000 32.1881 32.1881 9.7000e-004

0.0000 32.2123

Total 0.0233 0.2203 0.1741 8.5000e-004

0.0477 1.2800e-003

0.0490 0.0130 1.2100e-003

0.0142 0.0000 80.3692 80.3692 4.6600e-003

0.0000 80.4857


3.5 Paving - 2020


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Off-Road 0.0204 0.2110 0.2198 3.4000e-004

0.0113 0.0113 0.0104 0.0104 0.0000 30.0423 30.0423 9.7200e-003

0.0000 30.2852

Paving 6.2000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0266 0.2110 0.2198 3.4000e-004

0.0113 0.0113 0.0104 0.0104 0.0000 30.0423 30.0423 9.7200e-003

0.0000 30.2852




3.5 Paving - 2020


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 8.3000e-004

6.1000e-004

6.0200e-003

2.0000e-005

1.8000e-003

1.0000e-005

1.8200e-003

4.8000e-004

1.0000e-005

4.9000e-004

0.0000 1.6310 1.6310 5.0000e-005

0.0000 1.6322

Total 8.3000e-004

6.1000e-004

6.0200e-003

2.0000e-005

1.8000e-003

1.0000e-005

1.8200e-003

4.8000e-004

1.0000e-005

4.9000e-004

0.0000 1.6310 1.6310 5.0000e-005

0.0000 1.6322



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total




0.0182 0.2594 3.4000e-004

5.6000e-004

5.6000e-004

5.6000e-004

5.6000e-004

0.0000 30.0423 30.0423 9.7200e-003

0.0000 30.2852

Paving 6.2000e-003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 0.0104 0.0182 0.2594 3.4000e-004

5.6000e-004

5.6000e-004

5.6000e-004

5.6000e-004

0.0000 30.0423 30.0423 9.7200e-003

0.0000 30.2852




3.5 Paving - 2020


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 8.3000e-004

6.1000e-004

6.0200e-003

2.0000e-005

1.8000e-003

1.0000e-005

1.8200e-003

4.8000e-004

1.0000e-005

4.9000e-004

0.0000 1.6310 1.6310 5.0000e-005

0.0000 1.6322

Total 8.3000e-004

6.1000e-004

6.0200e-003

2.0000e-005

1.8000e-003

1.0000e-005

1.8200e-003

4.8000e-004

1.0000e-005

4.9000e-004

0.0000 1.6310 1.6310 5.0000e-005

0.0000 1.6322


3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 0.4893 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


0.0253 0.0275 4.0000e-005

1.6600e-003

1.6600e-003

1.6600e-003

1.6600e-003

0.0000 3.8299 3.8299 3.0000e-004

0.0000 3.8373

Total 0.4929 0.0253 0.0275 4.0000e-005

1.6600e-003

1.6600e-003

1.6600e-003

1.6600e-003

0.0000 3.8299 3.8299 3.0000e-004

0.0000 3.8373






Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.1600e-003

8.6000e-004

8.4300e-003

3.0000e-005

2.5300e-003

2.0000e-005

2.5400e-003

6.7000e-004

2.0000e-005

6.9000e-004

0.0000 2.2834 2.2834 7.0000e-005

0.0000 2.2851

Total 1.1600e-003

8.6000e-004

8.4300e-003

3.0000e-005

2.5300e-003

2.0000e-005

2.5400e-003

6.7000e-004

2.0000e-005

6.9000e-004

0.0000 2.2834 2.2834 7.0000e-005

0.0000 2.2851



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Archit. Coating 0.4893 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


1.9300e-003

0.0275 4.0000e-005

6.0000e-005

6.0000e-005

6.0000e-005

6.0000e-005

0.0000 3.8299 3.8299 3.0000e-004

0.0000 3.8373

Total 0.4897 1.9300e-003

0.0275 4.0000e-005

6.0000e-005

6.0000e-005

6.0000e-005

6.0000e-005

0.0000 3.8299 3.8299 3.0000e-004

0.0000 3.8373




4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile



Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Worker 1.1600e-003

8.6000e-004

8.4300e-003

3.0000e-005

2.5300e-003

2.0000e-005

2.5400e-003

6.7000e-004

2.0000e-005

6.9000e-004

0.0000 2.2834 2.2834 7.0000e-005

0.0000 2.2851

Total 1.1600e-003

8.6000e-004

8.4300e-003

3.0000e-005

2.5300e-003

2.0000e-005

2.5400e-003

6.7000e-004

2.0000e-005

6.9000e-004

0.0000 2.2834 2.2834 7.0000e-005

0.0000 2.2851





Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 0.1031 0.5078 1.5140 5.5800e-003

0.4917 4.6400e-003

0.4963 0.1317 4.3400e-003

0.1360 0.0000 514.4434 514.4434 0.0255 0.0000 515.0808

Unmitigated 0.1031 0.5078 1.5140 5.5800e-003

0.4917 4.6400e-003

0.4963 0.1317 4.3400e-003

0.1360 0.0000 514.4434 514.4434 0.0255 0.0000 515.0808

4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information

Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated

Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT

Government Office Building 347.00 0.00 0.00 1,304,581 1,304,581

Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00

Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total 347.00 0.00 0.00 1,304,581 1,304,581

Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %

Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by

Government Office Building 14.46 0.00 0.00 100.00 0.00 0.00 100 0 0

Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

4.4 Fleet Mix



5.0 Energy Detail


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Electricity Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 165.4322 165.4322 6.7700e-003

1.5400e-003

166.0600

Electricity Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 178.5590 178.5590 7.3100e-003

1.6600e-003

179.2366

NaturalGas Mitigated

4.5800e-003

0.0417 0.0350 2.5000e-004

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

0.0000 45.3379 45.3379 8.7000e-004

8.3000e-004

45.6073

NaturalGas Unmitigated

5.4400e-003

0.0495 0.0416 3.0000e-004

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

0.0000 53.8708 53.8708 1.0300e-003

9.9000e-004

54.1909

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

Exceed Title 24

Install Energy Efficient Appliances

Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH

Government Office Building 0.593936 0.041843 0.182569 0.108325 0.016436 0.005513 0.015940 0.023523 0.001912 0.001972 0.006090 0.000748 0.001193

Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.593936 0.041843 0.182569 0.108325 0.016436 0.005513 0.015940 0.023523 0.001912 0.001972 0.006090 0.000748 0.001193

Parking Lot 0.593936 0.041843 0.182569 0.108325 0.016436 0.005513 0.015940 0.023523 0.001912 0.001972 0.006090 0.000748 0.001193

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No Rail

0.593936 0.041843 0.182569 0.108325 0.016436 0.005513 0.015940 0.023523 0.001912 0.001972 0.006090 0.000748 0.001193

Historical Energy Use: N



5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr

Government Office Building

1.0095e+006

5.4400e-003

0.0495 0.0416 3.0000e-004

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

0.0000 53.8708 53.8708 1.0300e-003

9.9000e-004

54.1909

Other Asphalt Surfaces

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Unrefrigerated Warehouse-No

Rail

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 5.4400e-003

0.0495 0.0416 3.0000e-004

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

3.7600e-003

0.0000 53.8708 53.8708 1.0300e-003

9.9000e-004

54.1909

Unmitigated



5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas

NaturalGas Use


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr


849600 4.5800e-003

0.0417 0.0350 2.5000e-004

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

0.0000 45.3379 45.3379 8.7000e-004

8.3000e-004

45.6073


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


Rail

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 4.5800e-003

0.0417 0.0350 2.5000e-004

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

3.1700e-003

0.0000 45.3379 45.3379 8.7000e-004

8.3000e-004

45.6073

Mitigated



5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

Electricity Use

Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr


672000 163.8559 6.7100e-003

1.5200e-003

164.4777


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Parking Lot 23800 5.8032 2.4000e-004

5.0000e-005

5.8253


Rail

36500 8.8999 3.6000e-004

8.0000e-005

8.9337

Total 178.5590 7.3100e-003

1.6500e-003

179.2366

Unmitigated



6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity

Electricity Use


Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr


619925 151.1582 6.1900e-003

1.4100e-003

151.7319


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Parking Lot 23800 5.8032 2.4000e-004

5.0000e-005

5.8253


Rail

34740 8.4708 3.5000e-004

8.0000e-005

8.5029

Total 165.4322 6.7800e-003

1.5400e-003

166.0600

Mitigated




Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total



Mitigated 0.3247 2.0000e-005

2.1500e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.1700e-003

4.1700e-003

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.4400e-003

Unmitigated 0.3247 2.0000e-005

2.1500e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.1700e-003

4.1700e-003

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.4400e-003

6.2 Area by SubCategory


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr

Architectural Coating

0.0767 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.2477 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Landscaping 2.0000e-004

2.0000e-005

2.1500e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.1700e-003

4.1700e-003

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.4400e-003

Total 0.3247 2.0000e-005

2.1500e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.1700e-003

4.1700e-003

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.4400e-003

Unmitigated



Apply Water Conservation Strategy

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory


Exhaust PM10

PM10 Total

Fugitive PM2.5

Exhaust PM2.5

PM2.5 Total


SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr

Architectural Coating

0.0767 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Consumer Products

0.2477 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Landscaping 2.0000e-004

2.0000e-005

2.1500e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.1700e-003

4.1700e-003

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.4400e-003

Total 0.3247 2.0000e-005

2.1500e-003

0.0000 1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.1700e-003

4.1700e-003

1.0000e-005

0.0000 4.4400e-003

Mitigated




Category MT/yr

Mitigated 38.3852 0.2442 6.0700e-003

46.2987

Unmitigated 51.1802 0.3256 8.0900e-003

61.7316

7.2 Water by Land Use

Indoor/Outdoor Use


Land Use Mgal MT/yr


9.93298 / 6.08796

51.1802 0.3256 8.0900e-003

61.7316


0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


Rail

0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 51.1802 0.3256 8.0900e-003

61.7316

Unmitigated



8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

Institute Recycling and Composting Services

7.2 Water by Land Use

Indoor/Outdoor Use


Land Use Mgal MT/yr


7.44974 / 4.56597

38.3852 0.2442 6.0700e-003

46.2987


0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


Rail

0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 38.3852 0.2442 6.0700e-003

46.2987

Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail




MT/yr

Mitigated 7.0793 0.4184 0.0000 17.5387

Unmitigated 9.4391 0.5578 0.0000 23.3849

Category/Year

8.2 Waste by Land Use

Waste Disposed


Land Use tons MT/yr


46.5 9.4391 0.5578 0.0000 23.3849


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


Rail

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 9.4391 0.5578 0.0000 23.3849

Unmitigated



8.2 Waste by Land Use

Waste Disposed


Land Use tons MT/yr


34.875 7.0793 0.4184 0.0000 17.5387


0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000


Rail

0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Total 7.0793 0.4184 0.0000 17.5387

Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad

Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment

Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators

Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

Boilers

Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type

User Defined Equipment



11.0 Vegetation

Equipment Type Number



Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0

Daily Emission Estimates for -> Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust

Project Phases (Pounds) ROG (lbs/day) CO (lbs/day) NOx (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) SOx (lbs/day) CO2 (lbs/day) CH4 (lbs/day) N2O (lbs/day) CO2e (lbs/day)

Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.48 9.36 1.06 50.09 0.09 50.00 10.46 0.06 10.40 0.02 1,767.80 0.42 0.02 1,784.59

Grading/Excavation 2.56 50.42 5.21 50.34 0.34 50.00 10.66 0.26 10.40 0.09 8,719.82 2.45 0.09 8,806.58

Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 2.03 40.15 4.99 50.33 0.33 50.00 10.64 0.24 10.40 0.08 7,710.34 1.59 0.09 7,776.60

Paving 0.87 19.54 2.84 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.04 4,121.73 0.73 0.07 4,161.34

Maximum (pounds/day) 2.56 50.42 5.21 50.34 0.34 50.00 10.66 0.26 10.40 0.09 8,719.82 2.45 0.09 8,806.58

Total (tons/construction project) 0.20 4.11 0.52 3.89 0.04 3.85 0.83 0.02 0.80 0.01 798.81 0.17 0.01 806.05

Notes: Project Start Year -> 2018

Project Length (months) -> 12

Total Project Area (acres) -> 25

Maximum Area Disturbed/Day (acres) -> 5

Water Truck Used? -> Yes

Phase Soil Asphalt Soil Hauling Asphalt Hauling Worker Commute Water Truck

Grubbing/Land Clearing 0 0 0 0 360 40

Grading/Excavation 0 0 0 0 880 40

Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0 103 0 180 760 40

Paving 0 207 0 330 600 40

CO2e emissions are estimated by multiplying mass emissions for each GHG by its global warming potential (GWP), 1 , 25 and 298 for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively. Total CO2e is then estimated by summing CO2e estimates over all GHGs.

Total Emission Estimates by Phase for -> Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust Total Exhaust Fugitive Dust

Project Phases

(Tons for all except CO2e. Metric tonnes for CO2e)ROG (tons/phase) CO (tons/phase) NOx (tons/phase) PM10 (tons/phase) PM10 (tons/phase) PM10 (tons/phase) PM2.5 (tons/phase) PM2.5 (tons/phase) PM2.5 (tons/phase) SOx (tons/phase) CO2 (tons/phase) CH4 (tons/phase) N2O (tons/phase) CO2e (MT/phase)

Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.05 0.01 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.00 9.72 0.00 0.00 8.90

Grading/Excavation 0.03 0.55 0.06 0.55 0.00 0.55 0.12 0.00 0.11 0.00 95.92 0.03 0.00 87.88

Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.12 2.43 0.30 3.04 0.02 3.03 0.64 0.01 0.63 0.00 466.48 0.10 0.01 426.82

Paving 0.05 1.07 0.16 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 226.70 0.04 0.00 207.63

Maximum (tons/phase) 0.12 2.43 0.30 3.04 0.02 3.03 0.64 0.01 0.63 0.00 466.48 0.10 0.01 426.82

Total (tons/construction project) 0.20 4.11 0.52 3.89 0.04 3.85 0.83 0.02 0.80 0.01 798.81 0.17 0.01 731.24

CO2e emissions are estimated by multiplying mass emissions for each GHG by its global warming potential (GWP), 1 , 25 and 298 for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively. Total CO2e is then estimated by summing CO2e estimates over all GHGs.

The CO2e emissions are reported as metric tons per phase.

Daily VMT (miles/day)

Total PM10 emissions shown in column F are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns G and H. Total PM2.5 emissions shown in Column I are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns J and K.

EVOC

PM10 and PM2.5 estimates assume 50% control of fugitive dust from watering and associated dust control measures if a minimum number of water trucks are specified.

EVOC

PM10 and PM2.5 estimates assume 50% control of fugitive dust from watering and associated dust control measures if a minimum number of water trucks are specified.

Total PM10 emissions shown in column F are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns G and H. Total PM2.5 emissions shown in Column I are the sum of exhaust and fugitive dust emissions shown in columns J and K.

Total Material Imported/Exported

Volume (yd3/day)

Road Construction Emissions Model, Version 8.1.0 11/7/2017

Road Construction Emissions Model Version 8.1.0Data Entry Worksheet

Optional data input sections have a blue background. Only areas with a

yellow or blue background can be modified. Program defaults have a white background.

The user is required to enter information in cells D10 through D24, E28 through G35, and D38 through D41 for all project types.

Please use "Clear Data Input & User Overrides" button first before changing the Project Type or begin a new project.

Input TypeProject Name EVOC

Construction Start Year 2018Enter a Year between 2014 and

2025 (inclusive)

Project Type 1) New Road Construction : Project to build a roadway from bare ground, which generally requires more site preparation than widening an existing roadway

2) Road Widening : Project to add a new lane to an existing roadway

3) Bridge/Overpass Construction : Project to build an elevated roadway, which generally requires some different equipment than a new roadway, such as a crane

4) Other Linear Project Type: Non-roadway project such as a pipeline, transmission line, or levee construction

Project Construction Time 12.00 months

Working Days per Month 22.00 days (assume 22 if unknown)

Predominant Soil/Site Type: Enter 1, 2, or 3 1) Sand Gravel : Use for quaternary deposits (Delta/West County)

2) Weathered Rock-Earth : Use for Laguna formation (Jackson Highway area) or the Ione formation (Scott Road, Rancho Murieta)

3) Blasted Rock : Use for Salt Springs Slate or Copper Hill Volcanics (Folsom South of Highway 50, Rancho Murieta)

Project Length 2.33 miles

Total Project Area 24.80 acres

Maximum Area Disturbed/Day 5.00 acres

Water Trucks Used? 11. Yes

2. No

Material Hauling Quantity Input

Material Type PhaseHaul Truck Capacity (yd3) (assume

20 if unknown)Import Volume (yd3/day) Export Volume (yd3/day)

Grubbing/Land Clearing

Grading/Excavation

Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade

Paving

Grubbing/Land Clearing

Grading/Excavation

Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade20.00 103.00 0.00

Paving 20.00 207.00 0.00

Mitigation OptionsOn-road Fleet Emissions Mitigation Select "2010 and Newer On-road Vehicles Fleet" option when the on-road heavy-duty truck fleet for the project will be limited to vehicles of model year 2010 or newer

Off-road Equipment Emissions Mitigation

Select "Tier 4 Equipment" option if some or all off-road equipment used for the project meets CARB Tier 4 Standard

Will all off-road equipment be tier 4?

The remaining sections of this sheet contain areas that can be modified by the user, although those modifications are optional.

(for project within "Sacramento County", follow soil type selection

instructions in cells E18 to E20 otherwise see instructions provided in

cells J18 to J22)

1

All Tier 4 Equipment

Note: Required data input sections have a yellow background.

Soil

Asphalt

Please note that the soil type instructions provided in cells

E18 to E20 are specific to Sacramento County. Maps

available from the California Geologic Survey (see weblink

below) can be used to determine soil type outside

Sacramento County.

http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/information/geologic_

mapping/Pages/googlemaps.aspx#regionalseries

1

Tier 4 Equipment

2010 and Newer On-road Vehicles Fleet

Select "20% NOx and 45% Exhaust PM reduction" option if the project will be required to use a lower emitting off-road construction fleet. The SMAQMD Construction Mitigation

Calculator can be used to confirm compliance with this mitigation measure (http://www.airquality.org/ceqa/mitigation.shtml).

To begin a new project, click this button toclear data previously entered. This buttonwill only work if you opted not to disablemacros when loading this spreadsheet.

Data Entry Worksheet 2


Note: The program's estimates of construction period phase length can be overridden in cells D50 through D53, and F50 through F53.

Program Program

User Override of Calculated User Override of Default

Construction Periods Construction Months Months Phase Starting Date Phase Starting Date

Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.50 1.20 1/1/2018

Grading/Excavation 1.00 4.80 1/17/2018

Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 5.50 4.20 2/17/2018

Paving 5.00 1.80 8/4/2018

Totals (Months)

Note: Soil Hauling emission default values can be overridden in cells D61 through D64, and F61 through F64.

Soil Hauling Emissions User Override of Program Estimate of User Override of Truck Default Values Calculated

User Input Miles/Round Trip Miles/Round Trip Round Trips/Day Round Trips/Day Daily VMT

Miles/round trip: Grubbing/Land Clearing 30.00 0 0.00

Miles/round trip: Grading/Excavation 30.00 0 0.00

Miles/round trip: Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 30.00 0 0.00

Miles/round trip: Paving 30.00 0 0.00

2010+ Model Year Mitigation Option Emission Rates ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/mile) 0.07 0.36 1.51 0.10 0.04 0.02 1,590.26 0.00 0.05 1,605.93

Grading/Excavation (grams/mile) 0.07 0.36 1.51 0.10 0.04 0.02 1,590.26 0.00 0.05 1,605.93

Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/mile) 0.07 0.36 1.51 0.10 0.04 0.02 1,590.26 0.00 0.05 1,605.93

Paving (grams/mile) 0.07 0.36 1.51 0.10 0.04 0.02 1,589.99 0.00 0.05 1,605.65

Hauling Emissions ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Pounds per day - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Tons per const. Period - Grubbing/Land Clearing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Pounds per day - Grading/Excavation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Tons per const. Period - Grading/Excavation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Pounds per day - Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Tons per const. Period - Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Pounds per day - Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Tons per const. Period - Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Total tons per construction project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Note: Asphalt Hauling emission default values can be overridden in cells D87 through D90, and F87 through F90.

Asphalt Hauling Emissions User Override of Program Estimate of User Override of Truck Default Values Calculated

User Input Miles/Round Trip Miles/Round Trip Round Trips/Day Round Trips/Day Daily VMT

Miles/round trip: Grubbing/Land Clearing 30.00 0 0.00

Miles/round trip: Grading/Excavation 30.00 0 0.00

Miles/round trip: Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 30.00 6 180.00

Miles/round trip: Paving 30.00 11 330.00






Emissions ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e







Pounds per day - Paving 0.05 0.26 1.10 0.07 0.03 0.01 1,156.76 0.00 0.04 1,168.16



12



Note: Worker commute default values can be overridden in cells D113 through D118.

Worker Commute Emissions User Override of Worker

User Input Commute Default Values Default Values

Miles/ one-way trip 20 Calculated Calculated

One-way trips/day 2 Daily Trips Daily VMT

No. of employees: Grubbing/Land Clearing 9 18 360.00

No. of employees: Grading/Excavation 22 44 880.00

No. of employees: Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade 19 38 760.00

No. of employees: Paving 15 30 600.00

Emission Rates ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/mile) 0.03 1.33 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.00 393.83 0.01 0.01 395.91

Grading/Excavation (grams/mile) 0.03 1.33 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.00 393.83 0.01 0.01 395.91

Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/mile) 0.03 1.33 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.00 393.83 0.01 0.01 395.91

Paving (grams/mile) 0.03 1.32 0.15 0.05 0.02 0.00 393.58 0.01 0.01 395.65

Grubbing/Land Clearing (grams/trip) 1.17 3.21 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.83 0.02 0.01 91.49

Grading/Excavation (grams/trip) 1.17 3.21 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.83 0.02 0.01 91.49

Draining/Utilities/Sub-Grade (grams/trip) 1.17 3.21 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.83 0.02 0.01 91.49

Paving (grams/trip) 1.17 3.21 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.79 0.02 0.01 91.45











Note: Water Truck default values can be overridden in cells D145 through D148, and F145 through F148.

Water Truck Emissions User Override of Program Estimate of User Override of Truck Default Values Calculated

User Input Default # Water Trucks Number of Water Trucks Miles Traveled/Vehicle/Day Miles Traveled/Vehicle/Day Daily VMT

Grubbing/Land Clearing - Exhaust 1 40.00 40.00

Grading/Excavation - Exhaust 1 40.00 40.00

Drainage/Utilities/Subgrade 1 40.00 40.00

Paving 1 40.00 40.00
















Note: Fugitive dust default values can be overridden in cells D171 through D173.

User Override of Max Default PM10 PM10 PM2.5 PM2.5

Acreage Disturbed/Day Maximum Acreage/Day pounds/day tons/per period pounds/day tons/per period

Fugitive Dust - Grubbing/Land Clearing 5.00 50.00 0.28 10.40 0.06

Fugitive Dust - Grading/Excavation 5.00 50.00 0.55 10.40 0.11

Fugitive Dust - Drainage/Utilities/Subgrade 5.00 50.00 3.03 10.40 0.63

Fugitive Dust



Off-Road Equipment Emissions

Default

Grubbing/Land Clearing Number of Vehicles Override of Default ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Override of Default Number of Vehicles Program-estimate

Default Equipment Tier (applicable

only when "Tier 4 Mitigation" Option

Selected) Equipment Tier Type pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Aerial Lifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Air Compressors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Bore/Drill Rigs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Cement and Mortar Mixers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Concrete/Industrial Saws 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Cranes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Crawler Tractors 0.24 4.10 0.47 0.02 0.02 0.01 775.49 0.24 0.01 783.53

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Crushing/Proc. Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Excavators 0.16 4.04 0.33 0.02 0.02 0.01 536.03 0.17 0.00 541.59

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Forklifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Generator Sets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Graders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Off-Highway Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Off-Highway Trucks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Other Construction Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Other General Industrial Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Other Material Handling Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Pavers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Paving Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Plate Compactors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Pressure Washers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Rollers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Rough Terrain Forklifts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Rubber Tired Loaders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Scrapers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.00 5 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Signal Boards 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Skid Steer Loaders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Surfacing Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Sweepers/Scrubbers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Trenchers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Welders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

User-Defined Off-road Equipment If non-default vehicles are used, please provide information in 'Non-default Off-road Equipment' tab ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e

Type pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Grubbing/Land Clearing pounds per day 0.40 8.14 0.80 0.04 0.04 0.01 1,311.51 0.41 0.01 1,325.12

Grubbing/Land Clearing tons per phase 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.21 0.00 0.00 7.29

N/A

N/A

N/A

Equipment Tier

0.00

Number of Vehicles

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Mitigation Option

0.00

0.00



Default

Grading/Excavation Number of Vehicles Override of Default ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e










0 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Cranes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Crawler Tractors 0.24 4.10 0.47 0.02 0.02 0.01 775.49 0.24 0.01 783.53


3 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Excavators 0.49 12.13 0.98 0.05 0.05 0.02 1,608.08 0.50 0.01 1,624.78



1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Graders 0.19 3.29 0.38 0.02 0.02 0.01 629.41 0.20 0.01 635.92











2 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Rollers 0.16 4.02 0.33 0.02 0.01 0.01 534.41 0.17 0.00 539.95



1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Rubber Tired Loaders 0.19 3.30 0.38 0.02 0.02 0.01 619.57 0.19 0.01 626.01

2 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Scrapers 0.92 15.94 1.84 0.09 0.08 0.03 3,008.05 0.94 0.03 3,039.27





2 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 0.19 4.73 0.38 0.02 0.02 0.01 632.00 0.20 0.01 638.55





0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Grading/Excavation pounds per day 2.38 47.50 4.77 0.24 0.22 0.08 7,807.01 2.43 0.07 7,888.00

Grading/Excavation tons per phase 0.03 0.52 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 85.88 0.03 0.00 86.77

N/A

N/A

Equipment Tier

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Number of Vehicles

0.00

0.00

0.00

Mitigation Option



Default

Drainage/Utilities/Subgrade Number of Vehicles Override of Default ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e




Selected) Equipment Tier pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day pounds/day


1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Air Compressors 0.10 2.44 0.20 0.01 0.01 0.00 375.27 0.04 0.00 377.00





Model Default Tier Tier 4 Crawler Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


Model Default Tier Tier 4 Excavators 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Generator Sets 0.16 4.06 0.33 0.02 0.02 0.01 623.04 0.04 0.00 625.56

1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Graders 0.19 3.29 0.38 0.02 0.02 0.01 629.41 0.20 0.01 635.92








1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Plate Compactors 0.02 0.36 0.32 0.02 0.02 0.00 34.48 0.00 0.00 34.65


1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Pumps 0.16 4.06 0.33 0.02 0.02 0.01 623.04 0.05 0.00 625.61

Model Default Tier Tier 4 Rollers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Rough Terrain Forklifts 0.11 2.61 0.21 0.01 0.01 0.00 346.54 0.11 0.00 350.13



2 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Scrapers 0.92 15.94 1.84 0.09 0.08 0.03 3,008.05 0.94 0.03 3,039.27










0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade pounds per day 1.85 37.49 3.99 0.20 0.19 0.06 6,271.82 1.57 0.05 6,326.69

Drainage/Utilities/Sub-Grade tons per phase 0.11 2.27 0.24 0.01 0.01 0.00 379.44 0.09 0.00 382.76

N/A

N/A

N/A

Equipment Tier

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Number of Vehicles

0.00

0.00

Mitigation Option



Default

Paving Number of Vehicles Override of Default ROG CO NOx PM10 PM2.5 SOx CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e











Model Default Tier Tier 4 Crawler Tractors 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00


Model Default Tier Tier 4 Excavators 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



Model Default Tier Tier 4 Graders 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00






1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Pavers 0.14 3.45 0.28 0.01 0.01 0.00 458.43 0.14 0.00 463.18

1 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Paving Equipment 0.12 3.08 0.25 0.01 0.01 0.00 406.76 0.13 0.00 410.99




3 Model Default Tier Tier 4 Rollers 0.24 6.03 0.49 0.02 0.02 0.01 801.36 0.25 0.01 809.67




Model Default Tier Tier 4 Scrapers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00










0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Paving pounds per day 0.70 17.29 1.40 0.07 0.06 0.02 2,298.33 0.72 0.02 2,322.18

Paving tons per phase 0.04 0.95 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 126.41 0.04 0.00 127.72

Total Emissions all Phases (tons per construction period) => 0.18 3.79 0.38 0.02 0.02 0.01 598.94 0.16 0.01 604.54

N/A

N/A

Equipment Tier

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

0.00

0.00

Number of Vehicles

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

Mitigation Option



Equipment default values for horsepower and hours/day can be overridden in cells D391 through D424 and F391 through F424.

User Override of Default Values User Override of Default Values

Equipment Horsepower Horsepower Hours/day Hours/day

Aerial Lifts 63 8

Air Compressors 78 8

Bore/Drill Rigs 206 8

Cement and Mortar Mixers 9 8

Concrete/Industrial Saws 81 8

Cranes 226 8

Crawler Tractors 208 8

Crushing/Proc. Equipment 85 8

Excavators 163 8

Forklifts 89 8

Generator Sets 84 8

Graders 175 8

Off-Highway Tractors 123 8

Off-Highway Trucks 400 8

Other Construction Equipment 172 8

Other General Industrial Equipment 88 8

Other Material Handling Equipment 167 8

Pavers 126 8

Paving Equipment 131 8

Plate Compactors 8 8

Pressure Washers 13 8

Pumps 84 8

Rollers 81 8

Rough Terrain Forklifts 100 8

Rubber Tired Dozers 255 8

Rubber Tired Loaders 200 8

Scrapers 362 8

Signal Boards 6 8

Skid Steer Loaders 65 8

Surfacing Equipment 254 8

Sweepers/Scrubbers 64 8

Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 98 8

Trenchers 81 8

Welders 46 8

END OF DATA ENTRY SHEET


Roadbase and Asphalt Calculation

Length 2.33 Miles

Ashpalt Depth 6 inches

Roadbase Depth 12 Inches

Roadbase Duration 5.5 Months

Asphalt Duration 5 Months

Total roadbase 18,188 Cubic Yards

Monthly roadbase 3,307 Cubic Yards

Daily roadbase 150 Cubic Yards

Total asphalt 9,094 Cubic Yards

Monthly asphalt 1,819 Cubic Yards

Daily asphalt 83 Cubic Yards

Daily Trips Annual Trips Annual VMTTech Business Park 52 Acres 6,156 1,539,000 8,926,200 assumes 5.8 mile aveTech Business Park 40 Acres 4,735 1,183,846 6,866,308 assumes 5.8 mile aveEVOC 200 People 673 90,210 1,304,442 based on 14.46 milesNet Change (4,062)Reduction over allowed 66.0%

Project Building 50 Sq ftPeak Day Trips 13.53

3.04Converted Daily Trips 347Trip Rate 6.9393

Typical Day People Rate Daily TripsInstructors 8 3.3 26Staff 2 3.3 7Students 60 3.3 198Fuel/Deliveries/Maintenance 3.2Total 70 -- 234

Nighttime People Rate Daily TripsInstructors 4 3.3 13Staff 2 3.3 7Students 40 3.3 132Total 46 -- 152Peak Day People Rate Daily TripsInstructors 20 3.3 66Staff 4 3.3 13Students 180 3.3 594Fuel/Deliveries/Maintenance 3.2Total 204 -- 676

Weeks/year 52Standard Days 260 5x/weekWeekends 52 Every SaturdaySub-total 312Nights 104 2x/weekPeak Days/year 2

Day/Weekend 73,070Nighttime 15,787Annual Peak Trips 1,353

Annual Trips 90,210Increase in Distance 14.46 MilesAnnual VMT 1,304,442.38 Miles

Year2009 720.49 Co2 Intensity 0.0290 CH4 Intensity 0.0060 N2O Intensity2015 641.86 Co2 Intensity 0.0258 CH4 Intensity 0.0053 N2O Intensity2020 537.56 Co2 Intensity 0.0216 CH4 Intensity 0.0045 N2O Intensity2030 401.16 Co2 Intensity 0.0161 CH4 Intensity 0.0033 N2O Intensity2009 10.2% RPS % 10.2% RPS % 10.2% RPS %2015 20.0% RPS % 20.0% RPS % 20.0% RPS %2020 33.0% RPS % 33.0% RPS % 33.0% RPS %2030 50.0% RPS % 50.0% RPS % 50.0% RPS %


Emergency Vehicle Operations Course Project

ATTACHMENT 2 EVOC Locations with Average Travel Distance

UNCLASSIFIED // FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

1

Specified Sheriff’s Facilities / EVOC locations with Average Travel DistanceDate of product: September 2017 • Location: San Diego CountySources: SANGIS, AGOLCreated by : SDSO/LECC


Travel distance from specified Sheriff’s facilities to current EVOC site (Qualcomm Stadium)

Name Average Miles to Qualcomm Stadium

Sheriff's Facilities 22.27

Current EVOC SiteQualcomm Stadium



2

Specified Sheriff’s Facilities / EVOC locations with Average Travel DistanceDate of product: September 2017 • Location: San Diego CountySources: SANGIS, AGOLCreated by : SDSO/LECC

Name Average Miles to Otay Site

Sheriff's Facilities 36.73

Travel distance from specified Sheriff’s facilities to proposed Otay EVOC site

Proposed Otay Site - EVOC 32.56195,-116.91532

Climate Change Report Emergency Vehicle …...Climate Change Report Emergency Vehicle Operations...

Documents

Transcript of Climate Change Report Emergency Vehicle …...Climate Change Report Emergency Vehicle Operations...