Climate Change and Human Development (On-line Course for Journalists), UNDP
-
Upload
undp-in-europe-and-cis -
Category
Self Improvement
-
view
776 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Climate Change and Human Development (On-line Course for Journalists), UNDP
© 2007 UNDP. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.Proprietary and Confidential. Not For Distribution Without Prior Written Permission.
Climate Change and Human Development
On-line Course for Journalists on Climate Change and Human Development
2UNDP Environment and Energy Group 2
Workshop overview
Climate Change: A General Introduction Part 1
The Long View: Climate Change and Past Human Development
The Science of Climate Change: Anthropogenic impacts
Climate Change in Europe and the CIS region
The Economics of Climate Change
International Climate Change negotiations
Cases against Pro-active Climate Risk Management
Adaptation and Mitigations are complementary strategies Part 2
UNDP MDG Carbon Facility Part 3
2007 Human Development Report Part 4
3UNDP Environment and Energy Group 3
Part I
Climate Change:A General Introduction
4UNDP Environment and Energy Group 4
Chapter 1.1
The Long View: Climate Change and Past Human Development
5UNDP Environment and Energy Group 5
Long-term climate variability
The Earth’s climate changes on timescales of days to many millennia
Past ~2.5 million years:• Ice age cycle every ~100,000 years, driven by changes in Earth’s orbit• Temp. change of up to ~6-7º C globally between cold ice age & warm interglacial
• Human beings evolved against backdrop of glacial-interglacial oscillations• Humans have experienced a world up to ~6º C cooler than at present• Humans have experienced a world up to ~1.5º C warmer than at present
Pillar of lake sediment, in central Sahara, Libya
6UNDP Environment and Energy Group 6
Holocene Climatic Optimum• 10,000–5,000 yrs ago, arid belt of northern hemisphere was humid• Greater summer heating – more intense monsoon in today’s deserts • Sahara, Western Asia, South Asia, northern China wetter• Globally, temperatures little different from today (<0.4° C higher)
Civilisation and climate change
Role of climatic crises• Humid period interrupted by periodic climatic crises - agriculture • ~6,000 yrs ago: shift towards aridity with cold arid crisis - partial recovery• ~5,200 yrs ago: final collapse of monsoons in many areas
Civilisation as adaptation• First civilisations emerge in areas facing environmental crisis populations squeezed into remain productive areas - river valleys increase in competition, social inequality, social stratification cities & states emerge as product of adaptation to increase aridity need to secure territory, manage populations, intensify food production
• 4,200 years ago a further arid crisis devastates Egypt and Mesopotamia
7UNDP Environment and Energy Group 7
Lessons for development
Humanity has co-evolved with a dynamic climate• Climate change drives innovation, via crisis & disruption
Recent development has assumed a static climateDevelopment accommodates seasonal changes and extreme events with return periods of years to (in some cases) decades, but tends to ignore variability on decadal and longer timescales: e.g.
– building on flood plains– development on dynamic shorelines– expansion of agriculture into historically marginal areas (e.g. Sahel)– development that ignores longer-term climate variability increases vulnerability– complications of increasing levels of poverty
• Civilisation emerged during the last great global climatic upheaval• Since then, the global climate has remained relative stable• This period of stability is over
8UNDP Environment and Energy Group 8
Chapter 1.2
The Science of Climate Change: Anthropogenic Impacts
9UNDP Environment and Energy Group 9
10UNDP Environment and Energy Group 10Source: IPCC (2007)
Greenhouse gas concentrations are rising
• Increase since ~1750 due to industrial activity
• Rapid rise over past 50 years
• Atmospheric CO2 concentration has remained below 300 ppm for at least past 600,000 years
• Now at 380 ppm and rising
11UNDP Environment and Energy Group 11
Source: IPCC (2007)
Temperatures are rising
12UNDP Environment and Energy Group 12
Source: Science, 10 February 2005
Global temperatures over the past 1,200 years
13UNDP Environment and Energy Group 13
Attributing climate change to human activity
Natural + anthropogenic forcing Natural forcing only
Global mean surface temperature anomalies from observations (black) as as simulated by a variety of global climate models.
Source: IPCC (2007)
14UNDP Environment and Energy Group 14
EU Guardrail
EU Guardrail
Future emissions and warming scenariosA2 SRES Scenario
Strong regional economic growth and no capping of greenhouse gas emissions:
By 2100 - GHG concentrations of 700-1,000 ppm - Temperature rise of 2°-6° C
EU proposes keeping global temperature increase below 2º C to avoid “dangerous” climate change - Almost certain to exceed this “guardrail” value - Stabilisation below 550 ppm unlikely - Likely 2°C by 2050 and 3°C by 2100
Last time global temperature was 3°C above pre-industrial value: 3 million years ago
For higher temperatures, must go back tens of millions of years – no past analogue of future
Doubling
Doubling
15UNDP Environment and Energy Group 15
Projected temperature and precipitation changes
Source: IPCC (2007)
16UNDP Environment and Energy Group 16
Heat wave was associated with widespread mortality, especially elderly
Average temperature during 2003 heat wave was 22°C, far outside recorded range (mean value 17°C). Such an event very unlikely in the context of historical climate variability.
Estimated that probability of an extreme summer such as that of 2003 has more than doubled as a consequence of human-induced climate change.
Distribution of summer (average) temperatures in Switzerland from 1864-2003
European heat wave, 2003
17UNDP Environment and Energy Group 17
Past, present and future sea level
• 1990s: fastest recorded rise at 4mm per year
• Future increases likely to be similar or greater
• Longer term: ≥ 1m per century very plausible
Source: IPCC (2007)
Conservative estimate?
18UNDP Environment and Energy Group 18
Chapter 1.3
Climate Change in Europe and the CIS Region
19UNDP Environment and Energy Group 19
Drought in Central and Western Asia 1999-2003• Most of affected area semi-arid steppe with winter & early spring precipitation• Precipitation between 1998-2001 less than 55% of long-term regional average• Drought exacerbated by early snow-melt and higher temperatures• Intensity of rainfall and drought-hardened ground led to flash floods• Prolonged La Niña & unusually warm W. Pacific & E. Indian Ocean played role• Consistent with projections of increased rainfall variability & intensity, more
frequent drought, decline in snow and ice cover
Drying trends in South & South-East Europe• Southern & south-eastern Europe have become drier by up to 20% (past century)• Frequency of “very wet” days has decreased in southern Europe (past century)
Recent Observed Trends
20UNDP Environment and Energy Group 20
Key Vulnerabilities in Europe
Source: IPCC (2007)
TU: Tundra
BO: Boreal
AT: Atlantic
CE: Central
MT: Mountains
ME: Mediterranean
ST: Steppe
SLR: Sea-level rise
NAO: N. Atl. Oscil.
21UNDP Environment and Energy Group 21
Summary of impacts: Europe
Source: IPCC (2007)
• 1º - 5.5º C increase for Europe as a whole by 2100, for low-high emissions scenarios
• Warming greatest over E. Europe in winter, W. & S. Europe in summer
• Yearly maximum temperatures expected to increase most in S. & central Europe
• Some E. European countries expected to experience same no. of hot days as present-day S. Europe
• More year-to-year variability, & more heat waves & drought - dry periods increase by 2100 in E. Europe
• Deflection of summer storms - decrease of precipitation of 30-45% in central Europe in summer
• More Atlantic cyclone activity - more precipitation & strong winds over central Europe in winter
• Increase in intensity of daily precipitation, even where trend is one of drying
• Increased flood risk in eastern and central Europe
• Increase in winter flows and decrease (of up to 50%) in summer flows for Rhine, Slovakian rivers, Volga
• Increased irrigation demand, greatest in central & eastern Europe
• Surface runoff reduced by 20-30% in south-eastern Europe
• By 2070s, 100-year droughts return every 50 years or less
• Decreases in crop productivity in Mediterranean, south-west Balkans, southern European Russia
• Decreased demand for winter heating, increased demand for summer cooling
• More heat-related deaths, fewer cold-related deaths
22UNDP Environment and Energy Group 22
Climate change impacts in north-eastern Asia
Source: IPCC (2007)
• Impacts on infrastructure & transport
• Reduction in Arctic sea ice
• Impacts on carbon cycle
23UNDP Environment and Energy Group 23
Central Asia• Median warming of 3.7º C, modest seasonal variation
• Median annual precipitation decrease of 3%: +4% in winter, -13% in summer (dry season)
• Grasslands productivity reduced (10-30% projected for Mongolia) - livestock impacts
• Expansion of steppe and desert steppe, possible reduction in available agricultural land
• Northward shift of agricultural zones, shrinking of high mountainous zones and forest steppe
• Crop yields down by up to 30% (HadCM2 modelling studies with CO2 fertilisation)
• More frequent mudflow and avalanches
• Changes in runoff might affect hydropower generation (e.g. Tajikistan)
Russian Federation• Increased forest productivity in north, but more forest fires
• Lena river delta retreating at 3.6-4.5 m/yr
• Reduced grassland productivity& northward shift - impacts on milk yield & animal health
• Low river flow events possibly more frequent in crop growing regions of south-west
• Permafrost melting, affecting bearing capacity, exploitability (excavation, mining), subsidence
• Increases in malaria & tick-borne encephalitis already reported
• Extreme high temperatures may affect mortality (may be offset by warmer winter temperatures)
Summary of impacts: Central Asia & Russia
24UNDP Environment and Energy Group 24
Chapter 1.4
The Economics of Climate Change
25UNDP Environment and Energy Group 25
Greenhouse gas emissions
Climate change impacts
Global climate change: change in mean global temperature, changes in regional temperature, rainfall,
pressure, circulation etc
Mitigation: reduce emissions, reducing magnitude of CC
Adaptation: reduce vulnerability to CC impacts, reducing losses
Mitigation vs adaptation
Adaptation and mitigation are complementary strategies
Future warming – carbon intensive world (adapted from IPCC TAR WGI)
CO2 concentration
does NOT stabilize.
Climate change impacts in a carbon-intensive world
27UNDP Environment and Energy Group 27
Avoided damages from climate change
Stern (2006): 1% of global GDP/a: stabilisation at 550 ppm CO2e by 2050; 5-20% of global GDP/a if unmitigated (warming of 5C or more).
IPCC (2007): 3% of global GDP/a: stabilisation at 445-710ppm CO2e by 2030
Nordhaus (2007): 3% of global GDP/a: stabilisation at 685ppm by 2100
• What is dangerous climate change?
28UNDP Environment and Energy Group 28
Cost of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions
Costs of mitigation depend on:1. Abatement technology used2. Location of abatement3. Scale of deployment of technology
Where the global GHG emissions cap is set and who is allowed to trade will affect 1,2 and 3.
Stabilising at 550 ppm/2C implies carbon price of $35/tC•Nordhaus: $129.5 t C (685 ppm by 2100)•Stern: $314 t C (BAU)
29UNDP Environment and Energy Group 29
Paying for adaptation
Costs of adaptationWorld Bank: $9 bn - $41 bn/a Oxfam: <$50 bn/a (US and EU: 75% of bill)
Increases in ODA in the pipeline. Liability or opportunity?
•Total ODA in 2005: US$106.8 billion.•Scaling up to $50 billion/a by 2010 (G8)•Scaling up to $66 billion/a by 2015 (EU 15, 0.7% GNI)
Adaptation could displace MDG investments. Need to seek additional resources for adaptation and to protect planned ODA.
30UNDP Environment and Energy Group 30
Benefits from adaptation
1. Reduced damage to economy: Flood control in China: B/C = 4 (1960-2000)Flood proofing roads Bangladesh: 1.62 (2000-2025)Flood proofing homesteads, Chars Bangladesh: 1.4 (2000 – 2025)(Stern Review, DFID 2006)
2. Higher productivity levels: Mali Sorghum yields: +6 to + 56% yieldMali Pearl Millet yields: +13 to +57%Recorded malaria cases in Botswana 10 times lower in 2005-6 than in 1996-7.(IRI 2006)
31UNDP Environment and Energy Group 31
Adaptation and residual risk
Stern Review, 2006
32UNDP Environment and Energy Group 32
Chapter 1.5
International Climate Change negotiations
33UNDP Environment and Energy Group 33
Climate change entered the policy radar in 1979
1979 First World Climate Conference
1988 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) created
1990 IPCC First Assessment Report: scientific basis for UNFCCC
1992 (June) UNFCCC adopted at Rio Earth Summit
1994 (May) UNFCCC enters into force
1995 First Conference of the Parties (COP 1), Berlin
1997 COP 3, Kyoto: Kyoto Protocol adopted
1998 COP 4, Buenos Aires: Buenos Aires Plan of Action
2000 COP 6, The Hague: Talks on Plan of Action break down
2001 (July)2001 (October)
COP 6 “bis” resumes in BonnCOP 7, Marrakech: Marrakech Accords
2002 COP 8, Delhi: Delhi Declaration
2004 COP 10, Buenos Aires
2005 (February) Kyoto Protocol enters into force
2006 COP 12, Nairobi: Nairobi Work Programme
34UNDP Environment and Energy Group 34
The Convention clearly links climate change to development
Convention objective
achieve stabilization of greenhouse gas
concentrations in the atmosphere at a
low enough level to prevent “dangerous
anthropogenic Interference” with the climate system
• allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to to climate change;
• ensure food production is not threatened; and
• enable economic development to proceed sustainably
within timeframe
sufficient to
UNFCCC signed by 191 Parties – near universal membership
35UNDP Environment and Energy Group 35
Each Convention body has specialised role
Conference of the Parties (COP)• highest decision-making authority of the UNFCCC
Subsidiary Body for Scientific & Technological Advice (SBSTA)• provides link between scientific information and policy needs of COP
Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI)• advises on implementation issues
Global Environment Facility (GEF)• financial mechanism of the UNFCCC
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)• three working groups contribute to Assessment Reports• First Assessment Report (AR1) in 1990 served as basis for UNFCCC• AR2 (1995); AR3 (2001); AR4 (2007)
36UNDP Environment and Energy Group 36
The Convention clusters countries in three groups
“Common, but differentiated responsibilities”
Industrialised countries &
Economies in Transition (EITs)
• Adopt policies and measures with aim of reducing GHG emissions to 1990 levels
• EITs have “flexibility” in implementing commitments
Annex I
Industrialised countries
• Provide financial resources to enable developing countries to:
• mitigate• adapt
• Promote and facilitate technology transfer to EITs and non-Annex I Parties
Annex II
Developing countries
• COP identifies activities to address non-Annex I needs and concerns
• no quantitative obligations
• Least Developed Countries given special consideration
Non-Annex I
37UNDP Environment and Energy Group 37
Main features
• Legally binding targets for emissions of six major greenhouse gases in industrialised countries during first commitment period
• New international market-based instruments creating a new commodity: carbon
• Facilitate sustainable development and additional support to developing countries on adaptation
• Entry into force on 16 February 2005• 174 Parties, 1 regional economic organisation (June 2007)• Commitment period: 2008 – 2012
The Kyoto Protocol
38UNDP Environment and Energy Group 38
Several key issues remain at centre of climate negotiations
1. Engaging non-Annex I countries in mitigation efforts– particularly China and India
2. Engaging US and Australia in Kyoto Protocol– US is responsible for 20%-25% of global emissions
3. Funding for adaptation (impacts are already occurring)
4. Establishing new emission reduction targets (post-2012)– voluntary or mandatory?– absolute or relative?– sectoral targets?
5. Role of sinks (LULUCF → REED)
39UNDP Environment and Energy Group 39
Issue 1: Future emissions growth will come from today’s developing countries
Where FSU = former Soviet Union
Developed and developing country emissions currently about equal…… but developing countries have around 85% of total population
40UNDP Environment and Energy Group 40
Issue 2: Engaging the US and Australia in the Kyoto Protocol Issue 3: Countries least responsible for climate change are most vulnerable
41UNDP Environment and Energy Group 41
Result: UNFCCC negotiations are dominated by a few key positions
United States
• climate change is long-term problem
• premature to think about post-2012 framework
• focus on technologies that provide reductions in 20-30 years, not binding targets and timetables
European Union• climate change is urgent issue• chance to avoid dangerous
interference could be lost in next 10 to 20 years
• need binding targets & timetables
Asia Pacific Partnership (2006)
US, Australia, India, Japan, China, South Korea
Developing countries (G77)• climate change urgent issue
• developed countries are responsible and must act first• priority is development,
poverty reduction• need climate-
friendly technologies
42UNDP Environment and Energy Group 42
All sectors and regions have the potential to contribute
Note: estimates do not include non-technical options such as lifestyle changes
43UNDP Environment and Energy Group 43
Chapter 1.6
Cases Against Pro-Active Climate Risk Management
44UNDP Environment and Energy Group 44
Contrarians
1. The climate is not changing
2. The climate is changing, but this is part of a natural process
3. Human-induced climate change is real, but we should not worry about it
Since the late 1980s, a well-coordinated, well-funded campaign by contrarian scientists, free-market think tanks and some elements in industry has argued that we should not worry about climate change. There are three fundamental positions taken by the contrarians:
“…could it be that man-made global warming is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people? It sure sounds like it.” (Sen. J. Inhofe, Oklahoma)
“…the Left's best excuse for increasing government control over our actions in ways both large and small …the ideal scare campaign for those who hate capitalism and love big government… anti-American, anti-capitalist, and anti-human” (Christopher C. Horner, Competitive Enterprise Institute)
The arguments against action have not been consistent - they have evolved as it becomes more difficult to deny the science
45UNDP Environment and Energy Group 45
Contrarian Position 1: The climate is not changing
Realities
1. Manmade climate change is the only current satisfactory explanation for observed trends in climate
Evidence for warming comes from a huge variety of sources - nearly all parts of the world exhibit warming trends
Basic physics tells us that increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will lead to warming: both have been observed
Modelling only reproduces observations if includes GHG emissions
2. The scientific consensus is extremely strong - while there is uncertainty and disagreement about many potential impacts, the vast majority of climate scientists accept that human activity is influencing climate
3. IPCC is conservative in many respects, limiting itself to quantifiable science (e.g. sea-level projections). Science is subject to rigorous peer review
Assertions
1. Global warming is an invention of environmentalists - it is a hoax
2. There is no scientific consensus on climate change
3. IPCC and climate scientists are alarmist
46UNDP Environment and Energy Group 46
Contrarian Position 2: Climate change is real, but is not caused by human activity
Assertions
1. Climate has always changed. Climate change is nothing new.
2. Past warming has been as great or greater than that we are experiencing today
3. Past warming has preceded increases in greenhouse gas concentrations
4. The observed warming has been caused by an increase in the sun’s output
5. Climate models do not include effects of changes in solar output, volcanoes, etc
Realities
1. Sooner or later we will have to face significant natural climate change regardless of greenhouse gas emissions, but left alone the climate is likely to remain stable for many centuries or even millennia.
2. Global temperature probably comparable to today during last interglacial ~110,000 years ago. Medieval warm period appears to have been a regional, not a global, warming. Projected temperatures for late 20th century higher than any time during last 3 million years, possibly 10s of millions of years.
3. Yes, but the mechanisms were different (orbital) and greenhouse gases then amplified warming
4. There is evidence for a solar impact on climate in the past, but the recent effects of changes solar output is small compared with that of greenhouse gases, and recent observed solar changes are in the wrong direction to explain increased global temperatures
5. Wrong - climate models include many “forcings”, including solar, aerosols, volcanoes, etc
47UNDP Environment and Energy Group 47
Argument 3: Climate change is real, and is caused by human activity, but we should not worry about it
Realities
1. Models have trouble representing abrupt changes such as those known to have occurred in the past - may underestimate risks
2. There are limits to, and constraints on, adaptation
3. Warming of ~2-3°C may increase productivity of some crops/plants, but this will be offset by drought, extremes etc, & will not be sustained for higher temperatures
4. Climate change stimulates social change, but this often involves large-scale disruption to societies, and changes emerge after transitional crisis periods.
5. Adaptation cost estimates are few, and tend to assume gradual, low-magnitude changes. Uncertainty in impacts means that costs cannot be predicted. Where adaptation is not possible, losses are inevitable.
Assertions
1. Climate change will not be as bad as expected - risks have been exaggerated
2. We will adapt to climate change, as people adapted to past changes
3. Climate change is good - warmer conditions & more CO2 will green the world
4. Climate change will stimulate innovation and drive progress
5. The costs of mitigation will outweigh the costs of adaptation
48UNDP Environment and Energy Group 48
Growing the world economy today to better address climate change tomorrow
“…The elaborate and expensive actions now being considered to stop global warming will cost hundreds of billions of dollars, are often based on emotional rather than strictly scientific assumptions, and may very well have little impact on the world’s temperature for hundreds of years.”
Rather than starting with the most radical procedures, Lomborg argues we should first focus resources on more immediate concerns, such as fighting malaria and HIV/AIDS and assuring and maintaining a safe, fresh water supply – activities “which can be addressed at a fraction of the cost and save millions of lives within our lifetime.”