CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

25
H. MAINAUD DURAND CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

description

CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements. SUMMARY CLIC project: Introduction to the CLIC project Alignment requirements HL-LHC project: Introduction to the HL-LHC project Alignment requirements Common alignment requirements of both projects. CLIC: introduction to the project. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

Page 1: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

H. MAINAUD DURAND

CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

Page 2: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

2

SUMMARY

CLIC project:o Introduction to the CLIC projecto Alignment requirements

HL-LHC project:o Introduction to the HL-LHC projecto Alignment requirements

Common alignment requirements of both projects

Page 3: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

3

CLIC: introduction to the project

H. Mainaud Durand

Study for an e- e+ collider with a centre of mass energy of 3 TeV

Sub-µm beam size, down to a few nm at the IP A number of challenges to be mastered, among which:

o Very tight tolerances of alignment of components, to about 10 µm over a distance of 200mo Active stabilization of the quadrupoles in the nanometre range required

Page 4: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

4

CLIC: introduction to the project

H. Mainaud Durand

Page 5: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

5

CLIC: introduction to the project

H. Mainaud Durand

Based on a two beam acceleration concept Each linac consists of more than 10 000 modules (with a 2m length)

Page 6: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

6

CLIC: introduction to the project

H. Mainaud Durand

Different types of components: Quadrupoles :

o MB quadrupoles: ~ 4000 o DB quadrupoles: ~ 42 000

BPM: one per each quadrupole Accelerating structures: ~ 142 800 PETS components: ~ 71 000

Page 7: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

7

CLIC: alignment requirements

H. Mainaud Durand

Starting point = challenge concerning the pre-alignment of the CLIC components.

Requirements:

The zero of each component will be included in a cylinder with a radius of a few micrometers:

10 µm (BDS components) 14 µm (RF structures & MB quad BPM) 17 µm (MB quad) 20 µm (DB quad)

Active alignment consists of two steps: Determination of the position by alignment sensors Re-ajustment by actuators

Within +/- 0.1 mm (1s)

Active pre-alignment Beam based alignment Beam based feedbacksWithin a few µm

Mechanical pre-alignment

PRE-ALIGNMENT (beam off)

Page 8: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

8

SUMMARY

CLIC project:o Introduction to the CLIC projecto Alignment requirements

HL-LHC project:o Introduction to the HL-LHC projecto Alignment requirements

Common alignment requirements of both projects

Page 9: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

9

HL-LHC: introduction to the project

H. Mainaud Durand

Objective: to extend the discovery potential of the LHC, by increasing its luminosity by a factor 10 beyond its design value

Key innovative technologies:- cutting-edge 13T superconducting

magnets- Very compact and ultra precise

superconductive cavities for beam rotation (crab cavities)

- 300 m long high power superconducting links with zero energy dissipation

Page 10: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

10

HL-LHC: introduction to the project

H. Mainaud Durand

Page 11: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

HL-LHC: introduction to the project

Page 12: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

12

HL-LHC: Introduction to the project

H. Mainaud Durand

ATLASCMS

P. FessiaJP Corso and EN-MEF int. team

Page 13: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

13

HL-LHC: introduction to the project

H. Mainaud Durand

Page 14: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

14

HL-LHC: introduction to the project

H. Mainaud Durand

Page 15: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

15

HL-LHC: alignment requirements

H. Mainaud Durand

Within +/- 0.1 mm ? (1σ) Initial alignment (absolute position)

Smoothing

Fiducialisation

Within +/- 0.1 mm (1σ)

Monitoring of the relative position

Remote adjustment if needed

Within a few µm

Beam

Monitoring of the relative position

Remote adjustment if needed

Within +/- 0.1 mm (1σ)

Within +/- 0.1 mm ? (1σ)

Monitoring of the position of the cold mass w.r.t. external fiducials

Triplet

Other components of the LSS

Page 16: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

16

SUMMARY

CLIC project:o Introduction to the CLIC projecto Alignment requirements

HL-LHC project:o Introduction to the HL-LHC projecto Alignment requirements

Common alignment requirements of both projects

Page 17: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

17

Common requirements between both projects

H. Mainaud Durand

The determination of the position of the component can be divided (as an approximation) into two steps:

Determination of the “zero” of the component • In the referential frame of its mechanical support• In the referential frame of the sensor

Determination of the position of the referential frame of the sensor coupled to the component w.r.t a stretched considered as a straight reference

Step 1

Step 2

Step 1

Magnet

Mechanical support

Sensor referential frame

Straight reference

Page 18: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

18

BDS: strategyCommon requirements between both projects

H. Mainaud Durand

Straight reference

Sensor

Straight reference:

- Length > 200 m- Stable, along time, according to environment

conditions- Straight at a few micrometers

Sensor:

- Biaxial sensor, providing radial and vertical offsets w.r.t alignment reference

- Interchangeable at the micrometer level

- Repeatability of measurements < 1 μm

- Accuracy < 5 μm- Limited drift- Radiation hard, possibility of

remote electronics- Frequency of acquisition: 20 Hz.

n sensors, with n > 100

Page 19: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

19

BDS: strategyConclusion

H. Mainaud Durand

Alignment requirements between both projects are quite different:

• For HL-LHC: relative monitoring at the micrometer level, in a very severe environment

• For CLIC: absolute alignment at the micrometer level

In both cases, we will need:

• A straight alignment reference, stable along time and environment, over a length above 200 m

• n sensors (n between 20 and 100), plugged on the components to be aligned, providing radial and vertical offset measurements w.r.t the alignment reference at a micrometric accuracy.

Can the laser beam be such a straight reference?• what about the stability of the beam, the stability of the laser source• Is vacuum needed on such distances? Which vacuum? Are there other solutions?• What is the impact of temperature, humidity and other parameters on the

straightness of the laser beam?• How to be sure of the straightness of the beam?

Page 20: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

20

BDS: strategyConclusion

H. Mainaud Durand

Concerning the sensors:

• Which type of sensor can fulfil such requirements?• What is the impact of the diameter of the laser beam w.r.t. accuracy of the sensor?• How to attach the sensor to the component, and measure w.r.t. a laser beam under

vacuum?• How to transfer the position of the laser beam outside the vacuum pipe without any

constraints?• Are there rad hard sensors?• Which kind of algorithm for image processing should be used?

Then, once we have found a solution: how to validate the global solution?

These are a lot of questions! We hope to find a great number of answers during your presentations, and during the brainstorming.

Page 21: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

SPARES SLIDES

Page 22: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

22

BDS: strategy concerning the determination of positionSolution proposed

Installation and determination of the surface geodetic networkTransfer of reference into

tunnel

Absolute alignment of the elements

Relative alignment of the elements

Active prealignment

Control and maintenance of the alignment

H. Mainaud Durand

Installation and determination of the tunnel geodetic network

Page 23: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

23

Solution proposed

Transfer of reference into tunnel

Installation and determination of the tunnel geodetic network

Combination of 3D triangulation and trilateration coupled with measurements on vertical plumb wires

Methods validated on an LHC pit in 2010 (depth of 65 m): precision of 0.1 mm and accuracy of 0.5 mm

Hypothesis considered for CLIC: absolute position at the bottom of each pit: ± 2 mm (depth > 100 m)

Distance < 2.5 km

BDS: strategy concerning the determination of position

H. Mainaud Durand

Installation and determination of the surface geodetic network

Page 24: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

24

BDS: strategy

Solution proposed Absolute alignment of the elements

Relative alignment of the elements

Metrological Reference Network

Installed w.r.t the tunnel geodetic network

Overlapping stretched wires propagating the precision over long distances

Simulations in 2009: o Precision at the bottom of the shaft of ± 2 mmo Calibration of metrological plates: ± 5 μmo Distance between pits: 3.5 kmo Wires: 400m long Std deviation of 3.6 μm over 200m

of sliding window

Propagation network simulations

BDS: strategy concerning the determination of position

H. Mainaud Durand

Page 25: CLIC and HL-LHC alignment requirements

25

BDS: strategy

Solution proposed Absolute alignment of the elements

Relative alignment of the elements

TT1 facility

Precision on a 140 m wire: better than 2 microns over 33 days Standard error in the determination: 11 microns in vertical, 17

microns in radial. Can be improved!

BDS: strategy concerning the determination of position

H. Mainaud Durand