CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN … fileproject design document form (cdm-ssc-pdd) -...

PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD) - Version 03 CDM – Executive Board

1

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM (CDM-SSC-PDD)

Version 03 - in effect as of: 22 December 2006

CONTENTS A. General description of the small scale project activity B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period D. Environmental impacts E. Stakeholders’ comments

Annexes Annex 1: Contact information on participants in the proposed small scale project activity Annex 2: Information regarding public funding Annex 3: Baseline information

Annex 4: Monitoring Information


2

Revision history of this document Version Number

Date Description and reason of revision

01 21 January 2003

Initial adoption

02 8 July 2005 • The Board agreed to revise the CDM SSC PDD to reflect guidance and clarifications provided by the Board since version 01 of this document.

• As a consequence, the guidelines for completing CDM SSC PDD have been revised accordingly to version 2. The latest version can be found at <http://cdm.unfccc.int/Reference/Documents>.

03 22 December 2006

• The Board agreed to revise the CDM project design document for small-scale activities (CDM-SSC-PDD), taking into account CDM-PDD and CDM-NM.


3

SECTION A. General description of small-scale project activity A.1 Title of the small-scale project activity: Cebu CTRADE Biogas to Energy Project Version 4-4 18/5/2008 A.2. Description of the small-scale project activity: The proposed project is a bundled project activity to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions through the capture and destruction of biogas methane in two (2) farms employing pig and chicken wastes and the use of the recovered methane to fuel a generator which will supply the energy requirements of the farms in the province of Cebu, the Philippines (hereafter referred to as the project activity). This project activity will be implemented by C TRADE Philippines (hereafter referred to as CTRADE or project participant). The bundled project activity consists of two farms which are owned and operated by Wellisa Farms, a leader in the Philippines’ swine and egg-production industry:

Farm 1: at Wellisa Farms in Bantayan Island, Cebu (hereafter referred to as Bantayan Farm)

Farm 2: at Wellisa Farms in Tayud, Consolacion, Cebu (hereafter referred to as Tayud Farm)

The two farms currently use oxidation lagoons or ponds to manage their wastes. These wastes degrade anaerobically in the lagoons thereby producing biogas, a component of which is methane. To provide a more effective wastewater treatment technique for each of the farms, CTRADE will build in each of the farms an enclosed, dome-type anaerobic digester to trap, collect and use the biogas as a fuel to generate electricity for use by the farms. The two farms currently get their electricity supply from the Visayas Grid. With the project activity, renewable electricity will be supplied to the farms using biogas from the digesters. Excess biogas, when cannot be used for electricity, will be flared. The wastes from the pigs and chicken will be collected by Wellisa Farms to be treated in biogas digesters. The two farms at Bantayan Island and Tayud, wholly owned by Wellisa Farms, are planned to be expanded in a phased manner to reach full capacity. Bantayan Farm will have a population of 10,000 pigs and 1,000,000 chicken. Tayud Farm on the other hand will be operating on wastes from 3,000 pigs and 1,000,000 chicken. CTRADE, will install, own and operate biogas systems for these two farms. CTRADE will use a proven design biogas digester technology that has been tested in the same area and proven to be efficient in biogas production and waste treatment. Continuous biogas flow monitoring meters will be used to measure and record the actual total amount of methane reductions achieved at each site with remote data monitoring access to evaluate and audit through wireless connections. The project activity will contribute to a reduction of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at an average of 43,714 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum.


4

Contribution to Sustainable Development The Philippine Designated National Authority1 defines sustainable development criteria of a CDM project as comprising three dimensions, namely, environmental, economic and social. Indicators have been provided for each of these dimensions. CDM project activities in the Philippines must meet these. The following illustrates, briefly, how the proposed project activity meets these criteria: Environmental The design biogas digester technology is a closed system design that reuses treated water within the farms. Through this, the project activity significantly reduces BOD/COD levels below that which would otherwise flow into the surrounding water bodies with a real possibility of reaching the water tables and threatening the drinking water of both humans and animals in the area. Moreover the biodigester/waste treatment facility reduces the area’s susceptibility to mosquito breeding which may be the cause of local health concerns. As dengue is prevalent among children in the Philippines, the absence of stagnant water for bacteria and mosquitoes to breed is also seen as a welcome benefit for the current and future residents of the areas around the farms. On another significant level, the project controls air pollution caused by ammonia, which is released when the nitrogen from the wastes mixes with air. It is a common scenario in the Philippines where people near pig/chicken farms using oxidation ponds complain about the foul smell that arises intermittently. The farms in this project activity has not been spared of these complaints. As an enclosure, the project activity, through the biogas digester that will be installed, will capture all intense air borne pollution with only a very negligible amount of leakage, thereby controlling foul smell that is the root of all complaints. From the perspective of CTRADE and Wellisa Farms, the project activity will act as a clean technology demonstration project within the wastewater management sector in the Visayas Region, which they hope will be replicated by them across the Philippines through the help of CDM financing. Economic By utilizing the biogas collected from the digester to produce electricity, the project activity will displace electricity from the Visayas Grid. Through this, the project activity shares in the country’s quest for energy self sufficiency by depending less on non-renewable energy sources. The residents in the nearby area within the farms also stand to benefit directly from the project activity through the employment of local work force in the construction, operation and maintenance of the project activity. While the technology is not entirely new, the US technology design is a new improvement, and thus will entail technology transfer from the makers of the equipment to the local force employed in the project activity.

1 The Department of Environment and Natural Resources as designated by Executive Order 320. CDM Sustainable development criteria have been defined and are available from the DNA www.cdmdna.emb.gov.ph


5

One of the by-products of the installed biogas digester systems are solids which will be sold by the farms as fertilizers to nearby communities, thereby providing additional revenues for the farms. Social The residents in within the vicinity of the project areas can benefit directly and indirectly from the project activity. The labor force to be hired will develop their capacities through training and exposure on how to properly construct, operate and maintain the equipment in the farms. The increased confidence in the state-of-the-art technology to be provided by CTRADE will hopefully encourage development of similar project activities in the area, thereby improving local economy, and social conditions. From the perspective of CTRADE and Wellisa Farms, this project activity is a new development in the area which can contribute in promoting the province of Cebu as an environmentally-friendly place that manages its wastes properly. As one of the biggest farms in the Visayas Region, Welllisa Farms has been trying to intensify its efforts to manage its waste properly to set an example to other pig farms in the province of Cebu and in the region. A.3. Project participants:

Name of Party involved (*) ((host) indicates a host Party)

Private and/or public entity(ies) Project participants (*) (as applicable)

Kindly indicate if the Party involved wishes

to be considered as project participant

Philippines (host) C TRADE No

(*) In accordance with the CDM modalities and procedures, at the time of making the CDM-PDD public at the stage of validation, a Party involved may or may not have provided its approval. At the time of requesting registration, the approval by the Party(ies) involved is required. A.4. Technical description of the small-scale project activity: A.4.1. Location of the small-scale project activity: A.4.1.1. Host Party(ies): Republic of the Philippines A.4.1.2. Region/State/Province etc.: Cebu Province A.4.1.3. City/Town/Community etc: Farm Location

Farm 1: Bantayan Farm Brgy. Madrilejos, Bantayan Island, in the northernmost tip of Cebu Province, Philippines

Farm 2: Tayud Farm Tayud, Consolacion, Cebu Province, Philippines


6

A.4.1.4. Details of physical location, including information allowing the unique identification of this small-scale project activity :

v A.4.2. Type and category(ies) and technology/measure of the small-scale project activity: In accordance with Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale project activities, the proposed bundle project activity falls under the following: Type I: Renewable Energy Projects Category: D Grid Connected Renewable Electricity Generation

(Reference AMS-I.D) Version 13 At installed capacity of 200kW for Bantayan farm and 120kW for Tayud farm, the bundled project activity will be generating a total of 1,716 MWh of electricity per year, all of which will be used by the farms to cover their electricity requirements.

Bantayan Farm (Wellisa Farms) Bgy. Madrilejos Bantayan Is. 11° 11’ 49” N 123° 45’ 23” E

Tayud Farm (Wellisa Farms) Bgy. Tayud Consolacion, Cebu. 10° 22’ 33” N 123° 57’ 25” E


7

The project activity conforms to the applicability conditions of this methodology since the project generates electricity that displaces electricity from an electricity distribution system that is supplied by at least one fossil fuel fired generating unit. Furthermore, the total installed capacity of 320kW is less than the threshold of 15 MW. Type III: Other Project Activity Category: D Methane recovery in animal manure management systems

(Reference AMS-III.D) Version 14 The project is estimated to reduce an average of 43,714.0 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum from both the recovery and destruction of biogas methane that would otherwise be decaying anaerobically and the displaced electricity from the grid a total generating capacity of 320KW. The emission reductions of the project activity is less than the limit set at 60 kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent annually, thus, the project activity conforms to Type III-D project activities. Technology Used in the Project Activity The proposed biogas system to be installed by CTRADE in each of the farms will be composed of the following processes: 1. Waste Collection- Waste (solid & liquid) are funneled to waste canals during cleaning and flushing

and collected in centralized waste drainage system. 2. Waste Transportation – Wastes are drained into holding tanks. Then these wastes will be

transported to the biogas facility for treatment. 3. Waste Feeding – The wastes will be emptied into a holding or mixing tank and fed after

homogenizing tank into the primary digester. 4. Anaerobic Digestion in the Digester – The main digester is a steel or concrete tank with a pump as

stirring device. This dome-type digester ensures proper mixing of waste material with different group microorganism to ensure high rate degradation process. Retention time is seventeen (18) days.

5. Biogas Production – Biogas is produced by the metabolism of different groups of microorganism acting on the organic matter. As gas is produced and accumulated on top of the digester, enough pressure is exerted to displace the liquid inside the digester, which then exits from the digester into the sludge collecting tank. The gas is then filtered to be ready for use as fuel to power the generators.

6. Solid-Liquid Separation – After digestion, the slurry (solid and liquid) is pumped into a dewatering system. Water is then drained to a water holding tank for recycling. Around 90% of BOD and around 80-85% COD is removed by this system. This water is then pumped to a water recovery pond for aeration.

7. Waste Water Recycling – Water recycling pond enhances the quality of recovered water by introducing oxygen through mechanical aeration of biological method (e.g. reed bed or aerobic plants like water hyacinths). From here, water again will be recycled for cleaning and flushing the wastes in the farms.


8

The following is a simple illustration of the biogas system to be used by CTRADE.

A.4.3 Estimated amount of emission reductions over the chosen crediting period:

Year Annual emission reduction in tCO2e

Year 1 1 Sept 2008 – 31 Aug. 2009 4,702.5 Year 2: 1 Sept 2009 – 31 Aug 2010 20,467.5 Year 3: 1 Sept 2010 – 31 Aug 2011 36,605.9 Year 4: 1 Sept 2011 – 31 Aug 2012 53,623.4 Year 5: 1 Sept 2012 – 31 Aug 2013 53,623.4 Year 6: 1 Sept 2013 - 31 Aug 2014 53,623.4 Year 7: 1 Sept 2014 - 31 Aug 2015 53,623.4 Year 8: 1 Sept 2015- 31 Aug 2016 53,623.4 Year 9: 1 Sept 2016 - 31 Aug 2017 53,623.4

Year 10 15 Sept 2017 – 14 Sept 2018 53,623.4

Sum over crediting period 437,139.8 Annual average over the crediting period of

estimated reductions (tCO2e) 43,714.0

1

2 3

4

5

Inlet & Mixing Tank

Mixing Chamber (Anaerobic Digester)

Outlet

Sludge Separator Water Recovery & Recycle

Closed Flare

Gas Flow Monitor

Scrubber Gas Engine

Electric Generator and Burners

Electricity and Burners for Farm use

Filters Biogas

Gas Line

Inlet Pipe

Overflow

Sludge flow control

Gas Flow Monitor


9

A.4.4. Public funding of the small-scale project activity: Investments from CTRADE are used to finance this project activity. The project activity has not received and is not seeking public funding from Annex 1 countries. A.4.5. Confirmation that the small-scale project activity is not a debundled component of a large scale project activity: Guidelines set in Appendix C of the Simplified Modalities and Procedures for Small-Scale CDM project activities state that small-scale project activity shall be deemed a debundled component of a larger project activity if there is a registered small scale project activity or a request for registration by another small-scale project activity:

• By the same project participants, • In the same project category and technology/measure; • Registered within the previous 2 years and • Whose boundary is within 1 km of the project boundary of the proposed small scale

project activity at the closest point. None of the statements above is applicable to the project activity. Moreover, the project activity is a bundle of two small projects undergoing the CDM project cycle at the same time. SECTION B. Application of a baseline and monitoring methodology B.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to the small-scale project activity: AMS I.D - Grid connected renewable electricity generation (Version13) AMS-III.D – Methane Recovery in animal manure management systems (Version 14) B.2 Justification of the choice of the project category: The project activity conforms to applicability conditions of Type I-D.

This project comprises renewable energy generation units, such as photovoltaics, hydro, tidal/wave, wind, geothermal and renewable biomass, that supply electricity to and/or displace electricity from an electricity distribution system that is or would have been supplied by at least one fossil fuel fired generating unit.

The Project activity is a renewable electricity generation technology that aims to displace electricity from an electricity distribution system that is supplied by gas generators. The total installed capacity of 320kW is less than the thresholds set by this methodology.


10

The project activity conforms to applicability conditions of Type III-D.

(a) The livestock population in the farm is managed under confined conditions (b) Manure or the streams obtained after treatment are not dischared into

natural water resources (e.g. river or estuaries)

The project activity consists of livestock within confined conditions and manure and streams obtained after treatment will be used within the farm vicinity as fertilizer and/or re-used in a closed-loop system as cleaning liquid within the farm.

(c) The annual average temperature of baseline site where anaerobic manure treatment facility is ocated is higher than 5°C.

The averate temperature within the facility is approx 28a5°C.

(d) In the baseline scenario the retention time of manure waste in the anaerobic treatment system is greater than 1 montn, and in case of anaerobic lagoons in the baseline, their depths are at least 1m. The baseline scenario is an anaerobic lagoon with a retention time greater than 1month with a depth of at least 1m.

(e) No methane recovery and destruction by flaring, compbustion or gainful use takes place in the baseline scenario. Moreover, methane capture and destruction activities were not part of the baseline scenario.

Furthermore, the project activity shall satisfy the following conditions:

(a) the sludge must be handled aerobically. In case of soil application of the final sludge, the proper conditions and procedures (not resulting in methane emissions) must be ensured. As stated in paragraph (a) sludge collected from the project activity will be handled aerobically by drying and will either be given or sold as fertilizers to the nearby communities.

(b) Technical measures shall be used (e.g. flared, combusted) to ensure that all biogas produced by the digester is used or flared.

As stated in paragraph (b) the project activity utilizes the biogas to generate electricity. Excess biogas will be flared, ensuring that all biogas will be utilized.

Measures are limited to those that result in emission reductions of less than or equal to 60 kt CO2 equivalent annually.

Emission reduction of the project activity is less than 60,000 tCO2e. Specifically, calculated emission reduction for all farms is at an average of 43,714 tCO2e/year.


11

B.3. Description of the project boundary: For each of the farms, the project boundary is illustrated as follows: This is in accordance with the definition of project boundary in AMS Type I.D which “encompasses the physical, geographical site of the renewable generation source” and in AMS Type III.D which is “the physical, geographical site of the livestock and manure management systems, and the facilities which recover and flare/combust or use methane”. B.4. Description of baseline and its development: There is a common baseline for the two farms in terms of the emission reductions from the methane recovery component ie. without the project activity, an open lagoon would be used. For the electricity component, the calculations for the Bantayan Farm is conducted in accordance with paragraph 8 of Type I-D in the Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for CDM small scale project activities. A 0.8 emission factor is used for the Bantayan Farm baseline as prescribed in the methodology. For the electricity component of the Tayud Farm, the calculations are conducted in accordance with paragraph 9 of the Type I-D in the Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for CDM small scale project activities. Combined margin emission factor used for the Visayas grid is 0.43. The calculation of the baseline emissions for the methane recovery component of the project activity is in accordance with paragraph 7 of the Type III-D in the Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for CDM small scale project activities. Ex-ante calculation of baseline is done using the amount of wastes that would decay anaerobically using the Tier 2 approach in the 2006 IPCC guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.

Project Boundary

Swine and chicken Barns

Combustion Flare; Biogas

Generator

Dome-type anaerobic digester

Manure effluent loading

Biogas flow

Recycled Water

Electricity


12

B.5. Description of how the anthropogenic emissions of GHG by sources are reduced below those that would have occurred in the absence of the registered small-scale CDM project activity: The project activity aims to contribute to greenhouse gas reductions in the following ways:

1. Through the installation of a dome-type closed anaerobic digester, methane which would otherwise be left to escape from the decay of pig and chicken wastes, will be captured and eventually destroyed;

2. Methane will then be used as electricity for use at farm operation, displacing fossil-fuel based sources in the Visayas Grid;

3. Surplus methane, when cannot be used for electricity or heating ovens will be flared. Additional financing from the CDM has been seriously considered in planning the project activity as it is hindered by the following barriers, presented here according to Attachment A to Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for CDM small-scale project activities. As prescribed in Attachment A to Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for CDM small-scale project activities, evidence as to why the proposed project is additional is offered under the following categories of barriers: (a) investment barrier, (b) technological barrier, and (c) prevailing practice. a) Investment Barrier

Swine and poultry farms such as the Welissa Farms, have a difficult time securing financing for the implementation of biogas wastewater management projects. The following factors contribute to the investment barrier which these projects face:

Perceived Risk - Most local banks are not interested in these projects primarily because of lack of knowledge and experience with the technology. Current Practice - The current pond based treatment method is considered standard operating practice in the Philippines and the region for wastewater treatment. Moreover, for the Wellisa Farms considers the current pond system (business as usual scenario) as financially attractive, given that it works to required specification, it is compliant to legal requirements and it requires virtually no management input to achieve the key parameters. Lowest Cost - The current system represents the lowest cost option, with the only cost being the opportunity cost of alternative land use. The potential for CER revenues has therefore become an important part of the Project Developer’s implementation and financing strategy. (b) Technological Barrier: The predominant and known technology for piggery wastewater management in the Philippines is a series of lagoons (oxidation ponds).2 “Biological treatment of wastewater to produce biogas is a new and relatively unknown technology in the host country. The lack of available knowledge and confidence in the technology, especially among small privately owned swine farms, makes this type of development difficult to establish. As a result, most swine farm owners view this technology as risky

2 Cost Estimation of Biogas Plants in Piggeries: A Manual for Hog Raisers”, prepared by the Development Bank of the Philippines.


13

and prefer to maintain their farms in the traditional fashion. Moreover, many farmers are concerned that a bio-digester project is too complex to operate and maintain. The anaerobic digestion and biogas system utilized in the project scenario is quite different than previous experience in the Philippines. The project scenario represents a more technologically advanced alternative to the business as usual scenario. Anaerobic digestion systems are perceived as relatively high risk, being based upon the function of a biological system that is neither 100% characterized, nor performance guaranteed. The biological system is at constant risk of chemical shocks that can wipe out the anaerobes and biological activity (and subsequently the waste management and energy production regimes, which are both key to commercial operations). In general, they are perceived as a risky solution. Overall, the project scenario involves higher perceived risks due to the performance uncertainty in the past and a low market share of the new technology. (c) Prevailing Practice: The technology utilized in the project activity is not common practice in the Philippines and represents a higher risk alternative to the business as usual scenario. At present, pond treatment is standard practice in the Philippines and the region for swine farms. There is little experience of utilizing aerobic or anaerobic technologies in a Philippine context, and therefore these are not considered a high management priority. The highest priority for most in the sector is the management of their waste discharges to simply maintain compliance with local regulation. From the operator’s perspective, the lagoon system is a cheap and sufficient way to clean the wastewater. Summary: The current and expected practice in the host nation, which relies almost exclusively on pond based wastewater treatment facilities for piggeries, as well as the combination of lack of access to financing and high perceived risks of the selected technology, clearly demonstrate that this Project is additional and therefore not the baseline scenario. The prohibitive barriers that exist in the Philippines are confirmed by the observed trend in current piggery wastewater management practices. The barrier analysis above clearly demonstrates that the most plausible baseline scenario is the prevailing practice of pond systems. The most significant barriers facing the project activity are technology familiarity, perceived risk of the technology and the relative lack of investment interest among the key business constituency. B.6. Emission reductions:

B.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices: In the use of methodology I.D, a grid emission factor of 0.8 tCO2e/ MWh, this is the default value taken from table I.D.1. This has been used because Bantayan being an Island municipality is part of a mini-grid of Bantayan Island. For the electricity production of Tayud, a grid Emission Factor of 0.43 this is the calculated combined margin grid emission factor for the entire Visayas grid where the Tayud project is located. In the absence of national values for Methane Conversion Factors (MCF) and methane conversion capacity for manure (Boi) a tier II approach has been taken whereby default values are taken from the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume. 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use, Chapter 10: Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management was used. In particular tables 10.17 and 10A.8 has been used.


14

B.6.2. Data and parameters that are available at validation:

Data / Parameter: Number of heads of pigs and chicken Data unit: Heads Description: Number of pigs and chicken in a facility determines the facility design, the

amount of waste generated and the capacity of the digester. Source of data used: In-house data Value applied: heads of pig and chicken

Farm 1 Bantayan Farm • Swine = 3,000 to 10,000 heads • Chicken = 500,000 to 1,000,000 heads

Farm 2 Tayud Farm • Swine = 2,000 to 3,000 heads • Chicken = 140,000 to 1,000,000 heads

Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

Head of pigs and chickens are regularly recorded by Welissa Farms

Any comment: Actual flow measurement of biogas recovered will be continuously measured with remote wireless access to monitor and record data.

Data / Parameter: Vs Data unit: kg/head/year Description: daily volatile solids excreted for an animal within the population, Source of data used: 2006 IPCC Value applied: Breeder swine – 167.9

Market swine – 109.5 Poultry - 7.3

Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

2006 IPCC Default data for animals from western Europe: Breeder swine – 0.46 Market swine – 0.3 Poultry - 0.2 Multiplied by 365 days per year

Any comment: AMS III.D Ver.14 uses units of kg/head/year instead of kg/head/day in ver.13

Data / Parameter: MCF Data unit: fraction Description: Methane Conversion Factor Source of data used: 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Vol.4, Ch.10. Table 10.17 Value applied: 80% Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

Baseline case is the use of uncovered anaerobic lagoons in warm regions with climates ≥ 28°C

Any comment: None


15

Data / Parameter: BOi Data unit: m3/kg of VS Description: maximum CH4 producing capacity for manure produced by an animal

within defined population i. Source of data used: 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Vol.4, Ch.10. Table 10A-7 Value applied: 0.45 Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

2006 IPCC Default value for Western Europe: For both market swine and breeders swine = 0.45

Any comment: none

Data / Parameter: DCH4 Data unit: Tones/m3 Description: Density of methane at the temperature and pressure of the biogas in year y. Source of data used: density of methane at STP Value applied: 0.67 Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: GWPCH4 Data unit: Description: Global Warming Potential of Methane Source of data used: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2006 Value applied: 21 Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

Internationally accepted value for the global warming potential of methane in relation to CO2.

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: My Data unit: kg Description: Amount of waste or raw material that would decay aerobically in the

absence of the project activity per year Source of data used: Calculated from the number of heads at the site, the default value for

volatile solids and the number of days in a year Value applied: Mswine,y = 2,847,000 kg/yr

Mchickens,y = 14,600,000 kg/yr Justification of the choice of data or description of measurement methods and procedures actually applied :

Any comment:


16

B.6.3 Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions: Baseline Emissions for Electricity Generation Component Farm 1 Bantayan Farm In accordance with paragraph 9 of the in the Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for CDM small scale project activities, the following is the computation of the electricity component:

For a system where all generators use exclusively fuel oil and/or diesel fuel, the baseline is the annual kWh generated by the renewable unit times an emission coefficient for a modern diesel generating unit of the relevant capacity operating at optimal load as given in Table I.D.1.

Bantayan y LF ECbantayan,y EFgrid,y BE

year Generator rated

capacity hours per

year load factor Electricity consumption

emission factor

emission reduction

MW hours MWh tCO2/MWh tCO2

source project proponent 365 days x 24 hours

project proponent monitored

AMS I.D table I.D.I calculated

2008 0.20 8760 0.50 876.00 0.80 700.80 2009 0.20 8760 0.50 876.00 0.80 700.80 2010 0.20 8760 0.50 876.00 0.80 700.80 2011 0.20 8760 0.50 876.00 0.80 700.80 2012 0.20 8760 0.50 876.00 0.80 700.80 2013 0.20 8760 0.50 876.00 0.80 700.80 2014 0.20 8760 0.50 876.00 0.80 700.80 2015 0.20 8760 0.50 876.00 0.80 700.80 2016 0.20 8760 0.50 876.00 0.80 700.80 2017 0.20 8760 0.50 876.00 0.80 700.80 7,008.00

Farm 2 Tayud Farm In accordance with paragraph 9 of the in the Appendix B of the simplified modalities and procedures for CDM small scale project activities, the following is the computation of the electricity component: For all other systems, the baseline is the kWh produced by the renewable generating unit multiplied by an emission coefficient (measured in kg CO2equ/kWh) calculated in a transparent and conservative manner as:

a) The combined margin (CM), consisting of the combination of operating margin (OM) and build margin (BM) according to the procedures prescribed in the “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electrical system”. OR

b) The weighed average emissions (in kg CO2equ/kWh) of the current generation mix. The data of the year in which project generation occurs must be used. Calculations must be based on data from an official source (where available) and made publicly available. Option a) was chosen as a baseline for the Project. The combined margin emission factor for the grid is 0.431 kCO2e/kWh.


17

Tayud y LF ECtayud,y EFgrid,y ER

year Generator

rated capacity hours per year load factor

Electricity consumption

emission factor

emission reduction

MW hours MWh tCO2/MWh tCO2

source project

proponent 365 days x 24 hours project

proponent monitored visayas grid calculated 2008 0.00 8760 0.80 0.00 0.43 0.00 2009 0.06 8760 0.80 420.48 0.43 181.23 2010 0.12 8760 0.80 840.96 0.43 362.45 2011 0.12 8760 0.80 840.96 0.43 362.45 2012 0.12 8760 0.80 840.96 0.43 362.45 2013 0.12 8760 0.80 840.96 0.43 362.45 2014 0.12 8760 0.80 840.96 0.43 362.45 2015 0.12 8760 0.80 840.96 0.43 362.45 2016 0.12 8760 0.80 840.96 0.43 362.45 2017 0.12 8760 0.80 840.96 0.43 362.45

3,080.86

Total Baseline Emission for electricity component Baselineelectricity = Baselinebantayan + Baselinetayud

= 700.80 + 362.45 = 1,063 tCO2e (at full capacity for both farms)

Baseline Emissions for the Methane Recovery Component The basic formula used to calculate emission reduction as a function of baseline emissions is the following: BECH4,y = GWP * DCH4 * UFb * ΣMCFj * Bo,LT * NLT,y * VSLT,y * MS%Bl,j Where BE CH4,y Baseline emissions from methane generated in the baseline scenario. (tCO2e) GWPCH4 Global Warming Potential of Methane (IPCC default = 21)

DCH4 = density of methane at STP. (0.67 kg/m3 LT index for all types of livestock J index for animal waste management system MCFj = CH4 conversion factors for each manure management system j by climate

region k (IPCC, 2006) BOi = maximum CH4 producing capacity of the volatile solids generated for animal

type LT (m3CH4/kg dm) NLT,y Annual average number of animals of type “LT” in year “y” (numbers) VS = Volitile solids for livestock “LT” entering in the animal manure management

system in year “y” (on a dry matter weight basis, kg dm/animal.year) MS%i = fraction of animal species/category i’s manure handled using manure system j

in climate region k. UFb Model Correction factor to account for model uncertainties (0.94)


18

Baseline emissions from generated methane in the baseline scenario

Bantayan Tayud BECH4

year breeder market poultry breeder market poultry

2008 0.0 0.0 0.0 239.8 424.9 4,217.2 4,882.0

2009 2,398.3 0.0 9,268.6 359.7 637.4 9,036.9 21,701.0

2010 4,796.5 0.0 18,537.3 359.7 637.4 15,061.5 39,392.5

2011 7,994.2 0.0 18,537.3 359.7 637.4 30,123.1 57,651.7

2012 7,994.2 0.0 18,537.3 359.7 637.4 30,123.1 57,651.7

2013 7,994.2 0.0 18,537.3 359.7 637.4 30,123.1 57,651.7

2014 7,994.2 0.0 18,537.3 359.7 637.4 30,123.1 57,651.7

2015 7,994.2 0.0 18,537.3 359.7 637.4 30,123.1 57,651.7

2016 7,994.2 0.0 18,537.3 359.7 637.4 30,123.1 57,651.7

2017 7,994.2 0.0 18,537.3 359.7 637.4 30,123.1 57,651.7

Project Emissions Project emissions for this project is calculated with the following formula: PEy = PEPL,y + PEflare,y + PEpower,y Summary tables for project emissions are as follows:

PEPL,y Emissions due to physical leakage of biogas in year 'y' Bantayan Tayud PEPL,y

year breeder market poultry breeder market poultry tCO2e

2008 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.9 56.5 345.1 433.5

2009 318.9 0.0 1,232.5 47.8 84.8 739.5 2,104.7 2010 637.8 0.0 2,465.1 47.8 84.8 1,232.5 3,830.2 2011 1,063.1 0.0 2,465.1 47.8 84.8 2,465.1 5,062.7

2012 1,063.1 0.0 2,465.1 47.8 84.8 2,465.1 5,062.7

2013 1,063.1 0.0 2,465.1 47.8 84.8 2,465.1 5,062.7

2014 1,063.1 0.0 2,465.1 47.8 84.8 2,465.1 5,062.7

2015 1,063.1 0.0 2,465.1 47.8 84.8 2,465.1 5,062.7 2016 1,063.1 0.0 2,465.1 47.8 84.8 2,465.1 5,062.7 2017 1,063.1 0.0 2,465.1 47.8 84.8 2,465.1 5,062.7


19

PEflare,y Project Emissions from Flare Efficiency Bantayan Tayud PEflare,y

year Breeding Market Poultry Breeding Market Poultry

Project emissions

from flaring

tCO2e tCO2e tCO2e tCO2e tCO2e tCO2e tCO2e 2008 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 2.1 2.4 2009 1.2 0.0 4.6 0.2 0.3 4.5 10.9 2010 2.4 0.0 9.3 0.2 0.3 7.5 19.7 2011 4.0 0.0 9.3 0.2 0.3 15.1 28.8 2012 4.0 0.0 9.3 0.2 0.3 15.1 28.8 2013 4.0 0.0 9.3 0.2 0.3 15.1 28.8 2014 4.0 0.0 9.3 0.2 0.3 15.1 28.8 2015 4.0 0.0 9.3 0.2 0.3 15.1 28.8 2016 4.0 0.0 9.3 0.2 0.3 15.1 28.8 2017 4.0 0.0 9.3 0.2 0.3 15.1 28.8

PEpower,y Total Project emissions from electricity consumption

year Bantayan Tayud Total tCO2e tCO2e tCO2e

2008 2.8 3.5 6.32009 2.8 3.5 6.32010 2.8 3.5 6.32011 2.8 3.5 6.32012 2.8 3.5 6.32013 2.8 3.5 6.32014 2.8 3.5 6.32015 2.8 3.5 6.32016 2.8 3.5 6.32017 2.8 3.5 6.3

Project Leakage Type I-D and Type III-D of the Simplified Modalities and Procedures for Small Scale CDM Project activities, do not require leakage calculations. Total leakage of this project activity is zero.


20

Emission Reduction Calculation ERy = BECH4,y + BEEC,y - PEPL,y - PEflare,y - PEpower,y B.6.4 Summary of the ex-ante estimation of emission reductions: >>

BECH4,y + BEEC,y - PEPL,y - PEflare,y - PEpower,y = ERy

GHG emissions methane

emission from anaerobic

decomposition of waste +

Baseline emission

from electricity -

Project emissions physical leakage -

Project emissions

from flaring -

Project emissions

from electricity

consumption

total emissions reduction

tCO2/yr tCO2/yr tCO2/yr tCO2/yr tCO2/yr 2008 4,882.0 262.8 433.5 2.4 6.3 4,702.5 2009 21,701.0 882.0 2,104.7 10.9 6.3 20,467.5 2010 39,392.5 1,063.3 3,830.2 19.7 6.3 36,605.9 2011 57,651.7 1,063.3 5,062.7 28.8 6.3 53,623.4 2012 57,651.7 1,063.3 5,062.7 28.8 6.3 53,623.4 2013 57,651.7 1,063.3 5,062.7 28.8 6.3 53,623.4 2014 57,651.7 1,063.3 5,062.7 28.8 6.3 53,623.4 2015 57,651.7 1,063.3 5,062.7 28.8 6.3 53,623.4 2016 57,651.7 1,063.3 5,062.7 28.8 6.3 53,623.4 2017 57,651.7 1,063.3 5,062.7 28.8 6.3 53,623.4 SUM 437,139.8 Average 43,714.0

B.7 Application of a monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan:

B.7.1 Data and parameters monitored:

Data / Parameter: ECbantayan,y ECtayud,y Data unit: MWh Description: Electricity to be consumed by the project activity in year y Source of data to be used:

Electricity meter to be installed within the project boundary to monitor electricity consumed by the project activity.

Value of data ECbantayan,y = 6.5 MWh ECtayud,y = 8.2 MWh

Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Measured by electricity meters for both Bantayan and Tayud farms.

QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Electricity meters shall be maintained according to manufacturer’s specifications to ensure optimal operations of the device.

Any comment:


21

Data / Parameter: BGburnt,y Data unit: m3 Description: Biogas flared or used as fuel in year y Source of data to be used:

To me measured by a flow meter

Value of data Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

measured on a dry basis continuous biogas flow monitoring meter downloaded into data logger and remotely accessed by wireless for audit and QA/QC


Flow meters shall be calibrated as recommended by the manufacturer. Flow meters shall be subject to regular maintenance, testing and calibration to ensure accuracy.

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: FlowBG Data unit: m3/sec Description: Biogas flow rate from digester to the combustion equipment Source of data to be used:

Continuous Digital Flow meter to the flare and Continuous Digital flow meter to the gas generator at Standard Temperature and Pressure


measured on a dry basis continuous biogas flow monitoring meter downloaded into data logger and remotely accessed by wireless for audit and QA/QC Data will be stored electronically and printed quarterly and archived


Flow meters shall be calibrated as recommended by the manufacturer. Flow meters shall be subject to regular maintenance, testing and calibration to ensure accuracy.

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: FE Data unit: % Description: Rated flare efficiency based on manufacturer’s rating. Fraction of time in

which gas is combusted in the flare multiplied by the efficiency of the flaring process.

Source of data to be used:

AMS III.D

Value of data 50% Description of measurement methods and procedures to be applied:

Open flare will be used and a default value of 50% will be used.


Regular maintenance will ensure optimal operation of flares

Any comment:


22

Data / Parameter: wCH4 Data unit: Mass fraction Description: Percentage of methane component in the biogas. Source of data to be used:

Results of sampled biogas will be tested in a gas analyser.


Biogas samples will be taken periodically to the department of science and technology for analysis. Measurements will be taken at a 95% confidence level

Gas will be analysed on a dry basis. QA/QC procedures to be applied:

Any comment: Percentage of methane component in the biogas.

Data / Parameter: E Data unit: MWh/yr Description: Electricity generated by the project activity during each year of the crediting

period. Source of data to be used:

Electricity meter


Data will be collected from the start of the project for a minimum of 12 years. (Minimum 2 years after last CER issuance.)


Any comment:

Data / Parameter: Tbiogas Data unit: °C Description: Biogas temperature inside the digester Source of data to be used:

A thermometer will be used to measure temperature in the digester and the temperature of the biogas recorded for computing flow rate.


Biogas temperature will be measured at site prior to combustion


Any comment:


23

Data / Parameter: Tflare Data unit: °C Description: flare temperature Source of data to be used:

A temperature probe will be used to measure temperature of the flare to ensure that temperature is not below 500°C


Flare temperature will be measured by a temperature probe and recorded continuously.


Measured continuously according to manufacturer’s recommendations

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: Pbiogas Data unit: MPa Description: Pressure of biogas inside the enclosed biogas digester Source of data to be used:

Measured as a parameter of the flow meter.


Biogas pressure will be measured in the digester and recorded and used for computing flow rate.


Measuring devices will be maintained to ensure optimal operation.

Any comment:

Data / Parameter: Soil application Data unit: Qualitative observation Description: Soil application of solid material from the project activity Source of data to be used:

Site observation


Solid material taken from project activity shall be handled aerobically. Proper conditions and procedures will be used to ensure that no methane emissions will take place, since the sludge will be completely digested with a retention time of 18 days, before the solids are dried into fertilizer.


Fertilizer treatment enzymes will be used. And aerobic conditions will be applied to ensure that no methane emissions will take place.

Any comment:


24

B.7.2 Description of the monitoring plan:

The approved monitoring methodology is taken from the “Indicative Simplified Baseline and Monitoring Methodologies for Selected Small-Scale CDM Project Activity Categories”, version 14; the approved monitoring methodology is from AMS.III.D. Methane recovery in animal manure management systems:

22. The emission reductions achieved by the project activity will be determined ex-post through direct measurement of the amount of methane fuelled, flared or gainfully used. It is likely that the project activity involves manure treatment steps with higher methane conversion factors (MCF) than the MCF for the manure treatment systems used in the baseline situation, therefore the emission reductions achieved by the project activity is limited to the ex-post calculated baseline emissions minus project emissions using the actual monitored data for the project activity (NLT,y, MS% i,y and in case adjusted values for animal weight are used as defined in paragraph 12: VSLT,y). The emission reductions achieved in any year are the lowest value of the following:

ERy,ex-post= min [(BEy,ex-post - PEy,ex-post), (MDy - PEpower,y,ex-post)]

Where:

ERy,ex-post Emission reductions achieved by the project activity based on monitored values for year “y” (tCO2 e)

BEy,ex-post Baseline emissions calculated using formula 1 using ex post monitored values of NLT,y and if applicable VSLT,y

PEy,ex-post Project emissions calculated using formula 4 using ex post monitored values of NLT,y ,MS% i,y and if applicable VSLT,y

MDy Methane captured and destroyed or used gainfully by the project activity in year “y” (tCO2e)

PEpower,y,ex-post Emissions from the use of fossil fuel or electricity for the operation of the installed facilities based on monitored values in the year “y” (tCO2e)

In case of flaring/combustion MDy will be measured using the conditions of the flaring process: MDy = BGburnt,y * wCH4,y * DCH4 * FE * GWPCH4 Where:

BGburnt,y Biogas3 flared or combusted in year “y” (m3) wCH4,y Methane content3 in biogas in the year “y” (mass fraction) FE Flare efficiency in the year “y” (fraction) 23. The method for integration of the terms in equation above to obtain the results for one year of measurements within the confidence level, as well as the methods and instruments used for metering, recording and processing the data obtained, shall be described in the project design document and monitored during the crediting period. Flow and other monitors will be installed as required to measure the parameters for the above equation, and recorded using data loggers and electronic files.


25

24. In case of project activities covered under paragraph 4 (b) and 4 (c) the project participants shall maintain a biogas (or methane) balance based on:

(a) Continuous measurement of the amount of biogas captured at the methane recovery system of the animal manure waste management system;

(b) Continuous measurement of the amount of biogas used for various purposes in the project activity: e.g. heat, electricity, flare, injection into natural gas distribution grid, etc. The difference is considered as loss due to physical leakage and deducted from the emission reductions.

Continuous biogas flow monitors will be used to monitor and record for both (a) and (b) 25. The amount biogas recovered and fuelled, flared or used gainfully shall be monitored ex-post, using flow meters. The fraction of methane in the biogas should be measured with a continuous analyzer or, alternatively, with periodical measurements at a 95% confidence level. Temperature and pressure of the biogas are required to determine the density of methane combusted. Continuous monitoring using flow meters will be used to monitor the amount of biogas recovered, fuelled and used gainfully by power generators. Temperature and pressure gas is also measured continuously as part of the flow measurement instrumentation. The fraction of methane in biogas will be determined using periodic measurements at a 95% confidence level. 26. Regular maintenance should ensure optimal operation of flares. The flare efficiency, defined as the fraction of time in which the gas is combusted in the flare, multiplied by the efficiency of the flaring process, shall be monitored. One of the two following options shall be used to determine the efficiency of the flaring process in an enclosed flare:

a. to adopt a 90% default value or b. to perform a continuous monitoring of the efficiency.1

If option (a) is chosen, continuous check of compliance with the manufacturer’s specification of the flare device (temperature, biogas flow rate) should be done. If in any specific hour any of the parameters is out of the range of specifications, 50% of default value should be used for this specific hour. For open flare 50% default value should be used, as it is not possible in this case to monitor the efficiency. If at any given time the temperature of the flare is below 500ºC, 0% default value should be used for this period. An open flare with a 50% default value will be used. Project activities where a portion of the biogas is destroyed through flaring and the other portion is used for energy may consider to apply the flare efficiency to the portion of the biogas used for energy, if separate measurements are not performed. Separate measurements will be performed for flow although most of the biogas will be either used for power generation, heaters or stored. Flaring will only be used for emergency when the biogas is not used for any of the above useful purposes. 27. Flow meters, sampling devices and gas analyzers shall be subject to regular maintenance, testing and calibration to ensure accuracy. All flow meters and other monitors will be calibrated and cross checked and follow regular manufacturer recommended maintenance and testing.


26

C TRADE will monitor biogas production and electricity generation as part of standard operating procedure for the project activity.

Continuous biogas flow monitoring meters will be used to measure and record the actual total amount of methane reductions achieved at each site with remote real time data monitoring access to evaluate and audit through wireless connections. C TRADE has developed a monitoring workbook that will use this data to calculate CERs. Farm owners and C TRADE will keep electronic copies and paper copies for back-up purposes. This information will be used by C TRADE to audit as well for performance tracking purposes. Furthermore, audits and monitoring will be conducted by CTRADE, to increase efficiency and operating design for biogas recovery and collection. B.8 Date of completion of the application of the baseline and monitoring methodology and the name of the responsible person(s)/entity(ies) The baseline was revised and completed on 18 May 2008 The baseline was developed, verified and completed by CaFiS Inc. ([email protected]) and Dr. Prabhu Dayal, C TRADE, 5860 N. Calle Grandeza, Tucson, AZ 85718. USA ([email protected]) SECTION C. Duration of the project activity / crediting period C.1 Duration of the project activity: C.1.1. Starting date of the project activity: 01/12/2007 C.1.2. Expected operational lifetime of the project activity: Expected operational lifetime of the project activity: (in years and months) 25 years -0 months C.2 Choice of the crediting period and related information: C.2.1. Renewable crediting period C.2.1.1. Starting date of the first crediting period: Not applicable

C TRADE Design, finance, install,

procedures, train operators, build-operate-transfer ownership

Wellisa Farms Biogas Digesters

Wellisa Farms Operator and monitoring

C TRADE Resident Office Philippines, Audit Team, construction supervision, quarterly audits and monitoring


27

C.2.1.2. Length of the first crediting period: Not applicable C.2.2. Fixed crediting period: C.2.2.1. Starting date: 01/09/2008 (or when registered) C.2.2.2. Length: 10 years SECTION D. Environmental impacts D.1. If required by the host Party, documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity: For livestock industries such as piggery and poultry farms, the Government of the Philippines requires that an Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) be procured before these farms can operate. The law governing this is the Environmental Impact Statement System (EIS) by virtue of Presidential Decree No. 1586. The farm in Bantayan Island has complied with this requirement and their implementation is being monitored by local offices of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources in their areas. The farm in Tayud, meanwhile is exerting all its efforts to comply with the regulations set by the Philippine Government specifically on ECC compliance. The farm in Tayud was originally exempted from the EIS, but is now complying with the updated rules and regulations of the EIS to satisfy not just the CDM process, but the basic laws and principles of the Government of the Philippines. A new ECC was issued in November 2007 for Tayud. Copies as well as details of the farms’ ECC and other pertinent documents showing compliance to the EIS were submitted to the Philippine CDM-DNA as part of the requirements for national approval. D.2. If environmental impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, please provide conclusions and all references to support documentation of an environmental impact assessment undertaken in accordance with the procedures as required by the host Party: No significant environmental impacts are expected to result from the implementation of the project activity. The number of positive sustainable development impacts of the project activity illustrate that the project indeed contributes to environmental preservation and does not have a significant negative impact. Among the positive impacts of the project activity are GHG reductions, reduced levels of BOD and COD in the water, use of renewable electricity source and most significant of all, the loss of odour from ammonia production in the open lagoons which has been the cause of complaints against the Wellisa Farms in Cebu Province.


28

SECTION E. Stakeholders’ comments E.1. Brief description how comments by local stakeholders have been invited and compiled: Two local stakeholders’ consultation meetings using Cebu Province’s local languages (i.e. Cebuano, English) were conducted for this project activity, one for each of the farms. The following summarizes the details of the two meetings: Bundle Date Place of Meeting Number of Participants Farm 1 November 7, 2006 Brgy. Poblacion, Madrelejos,

Bantayan Island, Cebu 60 participants

Farm 2 August 28, 2007 Pitugo, Carsaga, Cebu (a few kilometres near the municipal government office of Consolacion, Tayud, Cebu)

12 participants

Each of the meetings were composed of the following stakeholders:

representatives of CTRADE and CAFIS INC. farm owner and his pertinent management staff municipal government representatives barangay officials (barangay captains, councillors (kagawad) neighbouring community representatives DENR office representatives (CENRO officer) Other pertinent local government representatives

While there were slight variations in the actual conduct of the stakeholders’ meetings for each of the farms due to the uniqueness of circumstances surrounding each site, the following were the standard program of activities followed during the conduct of the meetings:

1. Introduction of participants and welcoming remarks 2. Presentations on

a. project overview (project background, status and plans for the farm regarding the project, technology to be used etc)

b. CDM overview (background on the global warming phenomenon, how the project activity can benefit from CDM, contribution to sustainable development)

3. Discussion and open forum (Q&A) 4. Summary and closing 5. Refreshments


29

E.2. Summary of the comments received: The two stakeholders’ consultation meetings were conducted smoothly, having no objections or disagreements on the project activity. It was generally agreed that the project activity does contribute positively to putting solutions to local environmental concerns, and helping to achieve sustainable development objectives of the country. Questions aimed to clarify the presentations were discussed and these revolved around the following topics:

Technology and its costs Foul smell in the current system and the impact of the project activity to reduce it Financial arrangements between CTRADE and the project owner Ways on how Wellisa Farms can spearhead replicating the project activity to other farms

The specific questions and answers were properly translated from Cebuano to English, recorded and included in the minutes of the meetings submitted to the Philippine CDM DNA as part of the requirements for the host country national approval. E.3. Report on how due account was taken of any comments received:

No negative comments have been received in any of the meetings conducted for the project activity. As such, there is no need to take due account of the comments received.


30

Annex 1

CONTACT INFORMATION ON PARTICIPANTS IN THE PROJECT ACTIVITY

Organization: C TRADE Street/P.O.Box: San Miguel Ave, Ortigas Center

Building: 602 OMM Citra Bldg., City: Pasig City State/Region: Manila Postfix/ZIP: Country: Philippines Telephone: (63) 9183-388336 FAX: E-Mail: [email protected] URL: www.ctrade.org Represented by: Prabhu Dayal Title: President Salutation: Dr. Last Name: Dayal Middle Name: First Name: Prabhu Department: C TRADE Mobile: +1 520 904 5058 Direct FAX: + 1 602 296 0199 Direct tel: +1 520 615 3535 Personal E-Mail: [email protected]


31

Annex 2

INFORMATION REGARDING PUBLIC FUNDING

No public is used in this project.

Annex 3 BASELINE INFORMATION

See file entitled “cebu calculations ver 2-0.xls”

Annex 4

MONITORING INFORMATION

Information regarding monitoring has been provided in Section B above

- - - - -

CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN … fileproject design document form (cdm-ssc-pdd) -...

Documents

Transcript of CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM PROJECT DESIGN … fileproject design document form (cdm-ssc-pdd) -...