Classsification of rpd
-
Upload
navydent-dent -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
9.089 -
download
2
Transcript of Classsification of rpd
![Page 1: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
![Page 2: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Prime purpose for creating a classification system for partially dentulous arches is to enable the dentist
to clearly communicate to a listener or reader the condition of an oral cavity in which missing teeth are to be replaced with a prosthesis.
An additional benefit of a workable classification system is that it is a contributing aid in the learning of the fundamentals of design.
![Page 3: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Swenson classification system 1905Cummer’s classification system 1922Kennedy’s classification system 1925Bailyn’s system 1928Neurohr’s system 1939Mauk’s system 1942Beckett’s system 1953Friedman’s system 1954The Austin-Lidge classification system 1957Skinner’s system 1959Applegate-Kennedy’s system 1960
![Page 4: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The four primary classes represent only slight
modification of the kennedy’s system, whereas the
modifications of these four classes are changed
more drastically.
![Page 5: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Class I – An arch with one free end denture base.
Class II – an arch with two free end denture bases.
Class III – an arch with an edentulous space posteriorly on one or both sides of the mouth but with teeth present anteriorly and posteriorly to each space.
Class IV – an arch with an anterior edentulous space and with five or more anterior teeth missing.
![Page 6: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Swenson’s class I partially Swenson’s class II partially edentulous condition edentulous condition
Swenson’s class III partiallyedentulous condition
Swenson’s class IV partially Swenson’s class V partially edentulous condition edentulous condition
![Page 7: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The first system to receive recognition from the profession was one proposed by Cummer in 1920. His classification based upon the choice of natural teeth for direct retainers
Class I – a partially edentulous arch in which two diagonally opposite teeth are chosen as abutment teeth
Class II
- a partially edentulous arch in which two diametrically opposite tooth are chosen as abutment teeth for the attachment of the direct retainers with an indirect retainer as an auxillary attachment.
![Page 8: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Class III – a partially dentulous arch in which one or more teeth on the same side are chosen as abutment teeth for the attachment of the direct retainers with or without indirect retainer.
Class IV - a partially dentulous arch in which three or more teeth are chosen as abutment teeth for the attachment of direct retainers.
![Page 9: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
![Page 10: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
It is based on the relationship of the edentulous spaces to the abutment teeth.
Class I – Bilateral edentulous area located posterior to the remaining natural teeth.
Class II – Unilateral edentulous area located posterior to the remaining natural teeth.
Class III – Unilateral edentulous area with natural teeth remaining both anterior and posterior teeth
Class IV – A single but bilateral (Crossing the mid-line) edentulous area located anterior to the remaining natural teeth.
![Page 11: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Class I maxillary archClass I maxillary arch Class II mandibular Class II mandibular
archarch
class III mandibular arch Class IV maxillary arch
![Page 12: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Bailyn introduced a classification system based on whether the prosthesis is tooth- borne, tissue, or a combination of the two.
![Page 13: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Class P I – Edentulous region posterior to the cuspid between two available abutments not more than three teeth distant from each other.
Class P II – Edentulous bilateral regions posterior to the cuspids with one available abutment tooth for each denture base area.
Class P III – edentulous region atleast three teeth posterior to the distal abutment.
Class A III – edentulous space anterior to the first bicuspid and between two teeth, more than three teeth distant from each other.
![Page 14: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Class A I P II – Edentulous region anterior to the first bicuspid and between two available abutments less than three teeth distant from each other.
Class P I P II – both edentulous regions posterior to the cuspids: only one tooth available for anchorage, the other two separated by a distance of at least three teeth.
Class A I P III – has three edentulous spaces : One of these is anterior to the first bicuspid with two available anchor teeth separated by a distance of less than three teeth, another posterior to the cuspid with only one tooth for anchorage, third one posterior to the cuspid with two teeth available for abutments separated by less than three teeth
![Page 15: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Class P1 Class PII
Class P III Class A III
![Page 16: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Class A I P II Class P I P II
Class A I P III
![Page 17: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
A partial denture situatin falls under this classification when there are teeth posterior to all spans and when there are no more then four teeth missing in any space. A - Posterior teeth are missing and the anterior teeth are in place. B - Posterior teeth are missing, and some anterior teeth are missing C -Anterior teeth are missing and posterior teeth are in place. D-Anterior teeth are missing, and some posterior teeth are missing. These may be unilateral or bilateral spaces.
![Page 18: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Neurohr’s Class II division 1Variation 1a partially edentulous
Condition
Neurohr’s Class II division 1Variation 1a partially edentulous
Condition
Neurohr’s Class II division 1Variation 1b partially edentulous
Condition
Neurohr’s Class II division 2Variation 1a partially edentulous
Condition
![Page 19: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Mauk offered the profession a system of classification based on the
1)Number, length and position of the spaces and
2)The number and position of the remaining teeth
![Page 20: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Class I – has bilateral spaces and teeth remaining in anterior segment.Class II – has bilateral posterior spaces and one or more teeth at the posterior end of the one space.Class III – bilateral posterior spaces and one or more teeth at the posterior end of both space.Class IV – unilateral posterior space with or without teeth at the posterior end of the space.Class V – Has anterior space onlyClass VI – Has irregular spaces around the arch.
![Page 21: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Class I Class II
Class IIIClass IV
Class V Class VI
![Page 22: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Godfrey described a system based on the location and extent of the edentulous spaces where teeth are to be replaced. A feature of Godfrey's system is that there are no subdivisions or modifications to the main classes.
![Page 23: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Class A – has tooth borne denture bases in the anterior part of the mouth
Class B – has mucosa borne denture bases in the anterior of the mouth
Class C – has tooth borne denture bases in the posterior part of the mouth
Class D – has mucosa borne denture bases in the posterior part of mouth
![Page 24: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Godfrey’s class A partially Godfrey’s class B partially edentulous condition edentulous condition
Godfrey’s class C partially Godfrey’s class D partially edentulous condition edentulous condition
![Page 25: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Beckett proposed a system which, like the one suggested by Bailyn, is based on whether the denture base is tooth-borne, tissue-borne, or a combination of the two. The three basic classifications were:
Class 1- saddles (denture bases) which are tooth-borne;
![Page 26: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Class 2, saddles (denture bases) which are mucosa-borne;
Class 3, inadequate abutments to support the saddle (denture base)
![Page 27: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Friedman introduced a system in 1953 based on three essential segment types occurring either as discrete or as continuous segments. The letter A designates an anterior spaces (i.e., one or more of the six anterior teeth). The letter B designates a bounded posterior spaces. The letter C refers to a cantilever situation or a posterior free-end spaces.
![Page 28: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Friedman’s type A partially Friedman’s type B partiallyedentulous condition edentulous condition
Friedman’s type C partiallyedentulous condition
![Page 29: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
The Austin-Lidge classification system in which the letter A is used to designate an anterior spaces of spaces, P designates posterior spaces, and Bi designates a bilateral conditions.
Class A1
![Page 30: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Class A 1 – a missing anterior tooth on one side only.
Class A 2 – anterior teeth missing on both right and left sides.
Class P 1 – Posterior teeth are missing on one side only
Class P 2- Posterior teeth are missing on both right and left sides
Class A 1 P1 – anterior and posterior teeth are missing on one side only.
![Page 31: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Austin and Lidge class A2 Austin and Lidge class P2Partially Edentulous condition Partially Edentulous condition
Austin and Lidge class AB1 Austin and lidge class PB1 Partially Edentulous condition Partially Edentulous condition
![Page 32: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Skinners offered the profession a new and different classification in 1957. He noted that many removable partial denture classification in the past have been based on the number of teeth remaining, as exemplified by the work of Cummer.
![Page 33: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Skinner’s class I partially Skinner’s class IV partially edentulous condition edentulous condition
Skinner’s class II partially Skinner’s class V partially edentulous condition edentulous condition
![Page 34: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Applegate offers a system which is a modification of the Kennedy system.
![Page 35: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Kennedy-Applegate’s class I Kennedy-Applegate’s class II partially edentulous condition partially edentulous condition
Kennedy-Applegate’s class IVpartially edentulous condition
Kennedy-Applegate’s class V
partially edentulous condition
![Page 36: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
ConclusionThe treatment plan of any edentulous region
depends on its classification which eventually decides the success of the prosthesis.
Though many systems of classifications are available, the most universally used one is the Applegate – Kennedy System for its simplicity.
![Page 37: Classsification of rpd](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052315/556430a3d8b42ad3308b46f6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)