Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

55
Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri C enter on S chool-w ide S ystem s of P ositive B ehavior S upport U niversity of M issouri - C olum bia

Transcript of Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Page 1: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process

Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri

Center on School-wide Systemsof Positive Behavior Support University of Missouri - Columbia

Page 2: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Basic Tier II Steps

1. School-wide, including classroom, universals in place

2. Identify students who need additional supports

3. Identify what supports student needs– Environment– Intervention

4. Monitor & evaluate progress

Page 3: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Starting Point

• Work within current formal and informal systems• Develop missing steps of efficient process• Provide training and technical assistance to

facilitators– Classroom Problem Solving Teams (partnership)– Tier II Team

• Guided process with templates for environmental modifications and interventions

• Goal = fluency among all faculty and staff

Page 4: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Tier II Support Process

• Step 1 – Insure Universals, including Classroom, in place• Step 2 – Student Identification Process

– Decision Rules– Referral– Screen

• Step 3 – Classroom Problem Solving– Classroom supports (function-based)– Progress monitor

• Step 4 - Tier II supports– Non-responders to grade level supports– Match function of student behavior to intervention– Progress monitor

• Step 5 - Evaluate Process

Page 5: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Teams(Data, Practices, Systems)

• School-wide PBS– Universals– Connect points to Tier II & III

• Classroom Problem Solving– Review data – Develop function-based interventions

• Tier II (III) (e.g., CARE, SAT, TAT)

– Partner with Grade Level Problem Solving Lead/Coordinator

– Coordinate and monitor tier II supports

Page 6: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

3. Classroom Problem Solving

• Grade level / combinations• Once a week focus of meeting = social

behavior concerns when decision rule met• Standard problem solving steps

Page 7: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Classroom Problem Solving

• Process leader– Classroom teachers, Specialist teachers

• Tier II Team partner– School Psychologist, Counselor, Administrator

• Process– Data-based decision making

• Guiding questions

– Function-based intervention• Teach replacement• Environmental alterations / supports

– Monitor progress

Page 8: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Classroom Problem Solving

• Student meets data decision rule• Classroom teacher completes preliminary forms

(documents student progress to date)• Grade level lead walks team through problem solving

process• Tier II Team partner attends if team is unable to identify

patterns leading to intervention or when significant concerns noted

• Plan put in place • Student progress monitored and reported at weekly

meetings

Page 9: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Classroom Problem Solving Process

• Develop intervention based on function of behavior – Environment changes– Student skills to teach/practice/reinforce

• Monitor progress – Same data that brought them to your attention– Problem and Appropriate behavior– Teacher observations

Page 10: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

The Key

Behavior is functionally related to the teaching environment

Page 11: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.
Page 12: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Moving beyond the form of behavior...

Applied Behavior Analysis

Page 13: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

The Basics

Behavior is learned• Do not assume children know your

rules, expectations, or social skills• Every social interaction you have

with a child teaches him/her something

Page 14: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.
Page 15: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.
Page 16: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

The Basics

Behavior communicates need• Children engage in behavior(s) to

"get" what they find reinforcing or to "avoid" what they find aversive

• Need is determined by observing what happens prior to and immediately after behavior

Page 17: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Functional relationships with the Teaching Environment

Events that follow behavior

• Following a student behavior the environment “gives” something to the student and student behavior maintains or increases -- what ever was given is reinforcing to that individual

Page 18: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Functional relationships with the Teaching Environment

Events that follow behavior

• Following a behavior the environment allows the student to stop an activity or is removed from the situation and the student behavior maintains or increases -- the event the student is avoiding is aversive to that individual

Page 19: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Get/Acquire“Positive

Reinforcement”

• Receive attention from adults or peers

• Receive tangible objects or access to preferred activities

• Get automatic sensations

Escape/Avoid“Negative Reinforcement”

• Escape adults or peers

• Avoid tasks or responsibilities

• Avoid automatic sensations

Page 20: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Functional relationships with the Teaching Environment

Events that precede behavior• Events in the environment can “trigger”

challenging behavior - they serve as cues for the student to perform a behavior because the student can predict the outcome when the cue is present

Page 21: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

What antecedent events reliably precede problem behavior?

• When does the behavior occur?– What activities are taking place?– What people are present?– How is the environment arranged?

• When is the problem behavior absent?– What activities are taking place?– What people are present?– How is the environment arranged?

Page 22: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.
Page 23: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.
Page 24: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.
Page 25: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Parkade ElementaryColumbia, MO

Page 26: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

School Demographics•Currently 430 students•District Multi-Categorical classroom •District Emotional Disturbance program•Free and Reduced Percentage: 65%•Special Education Students: 19%•Mobility: 23%•Ethnicity

• White 46%• Minority 53%• Black 36%• Hispanic 7.5%• Asian 4%• Multi 2.5%• American Indian 2%• Pacific Islander 1%

Page 27: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Parkade Elementary Tier 2 Team Structure

Classroom Teachers

Tier 2 Developme

nt Team

Tier 2 Core Team

Page 28: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Grade Level Teams

• Meet Weekly Rotating between Academics and Social Behavior

• Discuss Students Who Meet Data Decision Criteria

• Use Function Base Decision Making• Collaborate and Generalize for Similar

Students’ Behavior and Function

Page 29: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Pg. 8

Page 30: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

1. Insure Universals Including Classrooms are in Place

• Teams discuss their expectations, rules, procedures and routines before the school year starts and then explicitly teach those in the first few days of school.

• Morning Meetings from 8:50-9:20 school-wide

• Lessons are determined by looking at previous months data

Page 31: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

1: Insure Universals, including Classrooms are in Place

1. Expectations & Rules2. Procedures & Routines3. Acknowledgment4. Response Strategies & Error Correction5. Active Supervision6. Opportunities to Respond7. Activity Sequence & Offering Choice8. Academic Success & Task Difficulty

Page 32: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

How We Know Universals Are in Place

• Schoolwide Evaluation Tool over 92%• Administrative Walk-Through’s To Observe

Classrooms• Feedback from Parents and Visitors• Office Discipline Data

Page 33: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

15% Tier 3Goal 5%

16% Tier 2Goal 15%

69% Tier 1Goal 80%

6+ Referrals

2-5 Referrals

0-1 Referral

57 students with 9+ Referrals

1712 referrals

Baseline Behavior Data Spring 2008

Page 34: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

7% Tier 3Goal 5%

10% Tier 2Goal 15%

83% Tier 1Goal 80%

Current Behavior Data2010-2011

516 Referrals

16 Students with 9+ Referrals

6+ Referrals

2-5 Referrals

0-1 Referrals

Page 35: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Tier II Support Process

1. Insure Universals, including Classroom, in place2. Student Identification Process3. Classroom Problem Solving4. Tier II Supports5. Evaluate Process

Page 36: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

2. Student Identification Process

Parkade Tier II Data Decision Rules – Behavior:– 2-5 Office referrals (Major)– 2+ Buddy Room referrals in a 2 week period (Minor)– Student is engaging in a repeated pattern of

problem behavior in more than one setting or with more than one adult

– Internalizing Behaviors– Problem behavior is having negative consequences

on student’s social relationships– The problem behavior is NOT dangerous to student

or others

Page 37: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Behavior Data Review

• On Monday teachers receive Minor and Major office discipline referrals before Grade Level Team Meeting Review and highlight students who meet any Tier II data decision rule

• Describe the Observable Problem Behavior• Be prepared to discuss student at Grade Level

Team Meeting

Page 38: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Tier II Support Process

1. Insure Universals, including Classroom, in place2. Student Identification Process3. Classroom Problem Solving4. Tier II Supports5. Evaluate Process

Page 39: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

3. Classroom Problem Solving

Grade Level Teams…Discuss Individual Students to Identify Strategies that Work for Similar Students in Each Teacher’s Class

Just like they do for Academics

Page 40: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

The Problem Solving Process

• Write Summary Statements-Antecedents

-Observable Problem Behavior-Outcomes/Consequences-Determine Function of Behavior

• Identify Replacement Behavior• Decide on Strategies That Match the Function

– Increase the Replacement Behavior– Decrease the Problem Behavior

• Plan to Progress Monitor

Page 41: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

ABC ExampleAntecedent Behavior Outcome Function

When Given an independent work task, mostly writing

Student Will Walk around the room, put head down, talk to other students

Because Teacher works with student 1 on 1.

Therefore, the function is to avoid or access hard writing tasks.

Replacement Behavior: Begin work, work the entire time and appropriately ask for help.Strategies to Increase Replacement Behavior: Teach student to put a Post-It on desk to ask for help.Strategies to Decrease Problem Behavior: Write to the star then check –in with the teacher.

Page 42: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

How Were Steps Taught?

• Multiple practice rewriting generic behaviors into specific observable behavior

• ABCs of Behavior (Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University)

• Training During Grade Level Team Meetings • Model, group practice, homework, review• Practice, practice, practice

Page 43: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

We Always Come Back to…Classroom Effective Practices

1. Expectations & Rules2. Procedures & Routines3. Acknowledgment4. Response Strategies & Error Correction5. Active Supervision6. Opportunities to Respond7. Activity Sequence & Offering Choice8. Academic Success & Task Difficulty

Page 44: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Strategies Teachers Used• Students Seeking Attention—

– Increased Pride Tickets… “It was like magic”– Moved student to the middle of the room to increase teacher

contact when moving in a Figure 8 pattern.– Made special 1:1 time at beginning of the day… “I faked being

interested during 1000 stories of military figures”• Students Avoiding Work –

– Teachers increased pre-corrects about work expectations– Teachers used strategies for independent writing, (e.g., write

to the star)– Taught appropriate ways to ask for help, (e.g., 3 fingers on the

shoulder, post-it on desk)

Page 45: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Tier II Support Process

1. Insure Universals, including Classroom, in place

2. Student Identification Process3. Classroom Problem Solving4. Tier II Supports5. Evaluate Process

Page 46: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

How Do We Know if Classroom Environmental Changes Were

Effective? • DATA

– Office Discipline Referrals (minors and majors)– Teacher Progress Monitoring (work completion,

Pride Tickets earned, etc) – Teacher perception

Page 47: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

4. Tier II Supports

• If Data indicated classroom strategies were not effective, teachers asked Administrator to take the student to Core Tier II Team.– Check In/Check Out– Social Skills Groups – Academics

Page 48: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Check In Check Out

• For students who seek consistent and frequent positive attention from adults

• Two facilitators – PE Teacher and Instructional Aide– Check in and out with students– Collect data on Daily Progress Report – Enter student points into Excel Spreadsheet daily– Rewards when students meet their goals

Page 49: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Check In Check Out Data

• Tier II Team Reviews data bimonthly to determine…

• Integrity of Implementation– If in question, Administrator does an observation

and DPRs checked• Review student graphs to decide…

– if student continues, – fading starts or – intervention is not appropriate.

Page 50: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Student Progress Monitoring Graph8/

30/1

1

9/1/

11

Mal

achi

Rob

inso

n

Man

ija K

ent

9/12

/11

9/14

/11

9/16

/11

9/19

/11

9/21

/11

9/27

/11

9/29

/11

10/4

/11

10/6

/11

10/1

1/11

10/1

3/11

10/1

8/11

10/2

0/11

10/2

5/11

10/2

7/11

0

20

40

60

80

100

Student 1

Pe

rce

nt

To

tal P

oin

ts

Page 51: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Student Progress Monitoring Graph

8/30

/11

9/1/

11

Mala

chi R

obins

on

Man

ija K

ent

9/12

/11

9/14

/11

9/16

/11

9/19

/11

9/21

/11

9/27

/11

9/29

/11

10/4

/11

10/6

/11

10/1

1/11

10/1

3/11

10/1

8/11

10/2

0/11

10/2

5/11

10/2

7/11

0102030405060708090

100

Student 2

Pe

rce

nt

To

tal P

oin

ts

Page 52: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

5. Evaluate Process

• Universals– Schoolwide Evaluation Tool (SET)– Big 5 Report Reviews– Self Assessment Tool

• Grade Level Team Problem Solving – Observations of process– Classroom major and minor discipline referrals

Page 53: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

5. Evaluate Process

• Tier II Interventions– Integrity of Implementation Checks– Student Data Graphs– Staff Self Assessment Surveys– Student Surveys

• Entire Tier II System– Benchmark for Advanced Tiers (BAT)– Individual Students Systems Evaluation Tool (ISSET)– Office Discipline Data

Page 54: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Lessons Learned

• Scheduling meetings is tricky• Must take the time to build trust• It is hard to focus on Tier II and not students

needing Tier III support• Plan for bringing new staff and new teams up

to date• Time for continuing professional development• Having a big enough binder

Page 55: Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri.

Classroom Problem Solving as Part of the Tier II Process

Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri

Center on School-wide Systemsof Positive Behavior Support University of Missouri - Columbia