Classification and Truth of Al-Muhannad _ Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamat

12/15/13 Classification and Truth of Al-Muhannad | ahlu sunnah wal jamat

ahlusunnahwaljamat.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/classification-and-truth-of-al-muhannad/ 1/14

Posted by zarbehaq

ahlu sunnah wal jamat

Hanafi School of Thought

Classification and Truth of Al-Muhannad

APR 24

AL MUHANNAD

Al Muhannd was written exclusively for Ahlus Sunnah scholars of Arab to prove that the Deobandis are not

wahabis. Al Muhannd has only deceived people and Mawlana Khaleel Ahmed did not write those beliefswhich were present in Deobandi books.

The Deobandis will give a list of scholars who signed Al Muhannad but they will shy away from giving thecomments of many scholars who signed. Also, Deobandis should present the book in the original form in

which it was presented to the Arab scholars, that is , in question and answer form, so that every one can see

the truth!

One small example of Deobandi deception in Al Muhannad.

First let us see what Mawlana Rashid Ahmed wrote in Fatwa Rashidiya on the issue of Mawlid.

1.Those Mawlid gatherings which do not have any ghair shariah activity , even in those gathering as amatter of precaution , people should not join in present time . ( Vol 1 ,page 48)

2.Question: Is it permissible to join in those Mawlid gatherings in which ONLY authentic narrations are

read out and no weak or fabricated narrations are read out?

Answer: It is impressible to join in these gatherings due to other reasons.

(Vol 2, p 131)

3.Mawlid gatherings are not permitted in any condition

(Vol 2, p 96)

4.Question: Is it allowed to participate in those urs gathering in which ONLY quran sheif is recited and

sweet is distributed?

Ads by BetterSurf

bj1CZXR0ZXJTdXJmJmg9cnZ6cjItYS5ha2FtYWloZC5uZXQmYz1ncmVlbiZvPXdzYXImZD0mdD0xOzI7Mzs0OzU7Njs3Ozg7OTsxMDsxMTsxMjsxMzsxNCZhPTQzMDAmcz0xMDA4Jnc9YWhsdXN1bm5haHdhbGphbWF0LndvcmRwcmVzcy5jb20mYj1iZDImcmQ9JnJpPQ==)

Ads by BetterSurf Ad OptionsAds by BetterSurf Ad Options



Answer: It is not allowed to join anyurs AND MAWLID gathering and all kind of urs and Mawlid are

impressible.

( Vol 3 , p 143).

Having read all this, now let us see how Mawlana Khaleel Ahmed twisted the facts in Al Muhannad.

(Kindly note that the questions in Al Muhannad were not asked by Arab scholars. Mawlana Khaleel himself

made questions and then replied to clarify Deobandi standing on different issues)

Question No 21 (Al Muhannad)

Do you say that Mawlid celeberations of prophet ( sal allahu alai hi wa sallam) is not allowed as per

shariah and it is offending( qabeeh) and biddah and haram? Or do you say something else on this?

Now if Mawlana Khaleel Ahmed had been a true Deobandi he would have given this reply:

Yes , our founder Ismaeel Dehalvee has called all these type of celeberation as Mushrikana act. Our

Shaykh Rashid Ahmed has called all types of Mawlid as impersiibsle and in his book Barheen Qatiya he

has said that Mawlid celeberatons are just like the hindu celeberating birth of their god Krishna.

If Mawlana Khaleel would have written this answer , we know how many scholars would have signed this

Al muhannd !

But Mawlana Khaleel was a wise man . He knew that the wahabi fitna was spreading fast and all the Ahlus

sunnah scholars were united against refuting wahabis. So he wrote the answer so as to please the scholars of

Ahlus sunnah!

Let us see , what was the answer which Mawlana Khaleel wrote

No muslim will have any problem in celeberating and discussing the birth of prophet. In fact no one can

say that it is biddah to discuss even the dust of the shoes of prophet or even to discuss the animal on which

prophet traveled. Discussing all those events and people who have some relation with prophet is very

pleasing and is considered mustahab near us. Whether it is the celeberation of his birth of discussuing his

life or his dreams, all this is recommended near us.

A few lines later.

We are not aginst discussing the event of birth but we are against those wrong things which have got

mixed with these celeberations as you have seen in the Indian celeberation of Mawlid, they have mawdu(

fabricated) narrations in their gatherings.Men and women mingle in these gatherings, lightning and other

un necessary things cause wastage of money and they consider these gatherings as wajib and those who

do not participate are criticized. Apart from all these , there are other anti shariah acts present , from which

no mawlid gathering is free.

This is just one small lie present in Al Muhannad !

No sunni scholar ever called Mawlid as Wajib and men and women never mingle in any mawlid

gathering. It is a big lie . Those functions which are arranged at night , only men attend and other mawlid

gatherings which are conducted in day time , has got lectures of Ahlus sunnah scholars teling about the



birth , life and noble character of prophet. Imagine this lie , that during those days , more than 70 yrs back ,

as per Mawlana Khaleel ,men and women used tomingle!

Those who are against Mawlid ,they fabricate stories to lable Ahlus Sunnah as ignorant.

One such booklet published by a Wahabi group in South Africa said that in India during mawlidceleberation a woman sits behind a veil carrying a baby in her lap. And when she pinches the baby, the

baby starts crying and the public stand as a mark of respect symbolising the birth of prophet.

This is such an ugly lie that who ever said this , he will be held accountable on the day of judgement. They

hate Ahlus sunnah so much that they can fabricate any story to full fill their desire.

This was just one question ( no 21) from Al Muhannd. All other answers have got big lies.

It is better to get the original copy of Al Muhannad and read it. Compare the answers given in AL

Muhannad with writings of Deobandi scholars present in other book. Then see how many lies you can

count!

The Latest fatwa from Deoband says

http://i396.photobucket.com/albums/pp50/AaronZakariya/1-1.jpg

(http://i396.photobucket.com/albums/pp50/AaronZakariya/1-1.jpg)

Najdi is called one who is attributed to a great reformer and scholar Hadhrat Shiakh Muhammad

ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi .This great reformist was accused of many things; therefore the

opponents attribute us to him for irritating us.

(Answer 5177)

Shaykh Gangohi al Deobandi said Ibn Abd al Wahab was a good man with correct approach . The

Wahabis also praise Ibn Abd al Wahab al Najdi

: Al Muhannad , the official Deobandi Aqida book which was signed by 25 deobandiakabirscholars states that they [ 25 deobandi scholars] agree with view of Imam Ibn Abidin al

Hanafi (Rh) on Ibn Abd Al Wahab al Najdi as mentioned in Durrul Mukhtar. [ Deobandi showed

this book to sunni Aarb scholars and got their approval]

Wahabis on the other hand do not accept the view of Ibn AbidiN al Hanafi (rh).

The recent fatwa from Deoband has accepted the view of Ibn Abd al wahab al najdi as correct aqida

view. [ Here Deobandis are contradicting their own Aqida book Al Muhannad], Wahabis on the other

hand have always said that aqida of Ibn Abdal Al wahab was correct.

The final point : Shaykh Gnagohi said Ibn Abd al wahab was correct in aqida. When deobandis wrote Al



The final point : Shaykh Gnagohi said Ibn Abd al wahab was correct in aqida. When deobandis wrote Al

Muhannad ( to get it approved from sunni arab scholars) they did not mention this point in that book. If

deobandis would have accepted the aqida and methodology of Ibn Abdal Wahab al Najdi , then sunni arab

scholars would not have signed this book!

Now official fatwa from Deoband has accepted the aqida and approach of Ibn Abdal Wahab as correct.

Here Deobandis are going against their own book , Al Muhannad.

This proves that Al Muhannad was written by Deobandis only to get it signed by sunni Aarb

scholars.

VIEW OF DEOBANDI SCHOLARS ON IBN ABDUL WAHAB NAJDI AL TAMIMI

Al-Muhannad, the book of beliefs of the ulama of Deoband, on page 12, contains the followingquestion and answer:

Question number 12: Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab held the view that shedding the blood of

Musalmaans and taking away their property and defiling their honour, all these things were lawful. He also

termed them idolaters. He was insolent towards the elders. What is your view of him? And do you (think

calling the Ahle Qiblah as infidels is a lawful act? Or do you think that he who does these things belongs to a

legitimate sect?

Answer: In our view ( Please note: OUR VIEW ( not My view) and Al Muhanned was sigbed by 40

leading scholars of deoband school of thought) the same verdict applies to them as has been given by the

writer of Durr-e-Mukhtaar. And Khawarij are a band of people who waged war against the Imam because

they thought him to be guilty of falsehood, that is, idolatry, which justified waging war. For this reason they

take the taking of our lives and our property and making our women captives to be lawful. He further held

that they were rebels. He also held that they did not Describe them as infidels because this was a matter of

interpretation, though a faulty one. And Allamah Shaami, in his marginal notes on the book, has said, Like

it happened in our times when the followers of Ibne Abdul Wahaab sallying forth from Najd overwhelmed

Haramain Shareefain. They described themselves as belonging to Hambali creed, but it was their belief that

only they were Musalmaans and whoever was against their belief was an idolater and, so, they justified the

killing of the Ahle Sunnat and the ulama of the Ahle Sunnat until Almighty Allah deprived them of their

ascendancy.

2. Hussein Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni says: Gentlemen Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab appeared

in the Najd in the 13th century A.H., and, because he harboured evil thoughts and held wrong beliefs, he

waged war on the Ahl-e-Sunnat Wall Jamaat, sought to force his evil thoughts upon them and considered

lawful seizing of their properties as the spoils of war, and killing them, and considered all these acts to bring

blessings. He was harsh on the people of the Haramain (Makkah and Madinah) in particular and on thepeople of the Hijaaz in general. He used most foul language against the pious men of the earlier generations.

Because of the atrocities committed by him on them, countless people had to flee the holy cities of Makkah

and Madinah, and many of them were martyred by his troops. In short, he was a tyrant, a rebel and an

altogether evil person.

(Ash-Shahaubus Saaqib, Page 42)

3. Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab believed that people all over the world and all Muslims were



3. Muhammad Ibne Abdul Wahaab believed that people all over the world and all Muslims were

polytheists and infidels. (Page 44)

4. The Najdis believed, and his followers still believe, that the lives of Prophets (Alihumus Salaam) were

limited to the times during which they lived upon this earth. Thereafter, in death, they and other faithfuls

are equal. (Page 45)

5. This group holds that having a vision of the blessed Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and visits to

his blessed tomb are bad innovations and unlawful. He also holds as unlawful even journeying in that

direction for this purpose. According to some of them, even journeying for the sake of paying a visit to the

blessed tomb is like committing fornication. May Allah save us from such evil thoughts! (Page 45)

6. The Wahaabis use most insolent language in respect of Prophethood and the person of the holy Prophet

himself (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and, in their insolence, claim to be the equals of the personality of

the holy Prophet, and, according to them, only a little benefit accrued from him during the times he was

preaching the Messages of Allah, and no benefits flowed from him after his passing away. And because they

think so, they consider as unlawful praying for Allahs forgiveness through his intercession. Their elders also

said that praying for Allahs forgiveness through his intercession was unlawful. (May Allah save us from

having such thoughts)! But, perhaps, it may be permissible to reproduce such thoughts, for merely

reproducing blaspheming words does not by itself constitute blasphemy). They also said that the staff in a

mans hand was of greater advantage to him than the glorious personality of the king of the universe (Sallal

Laahu Alaihi Wasallam), for with a staff in his hand one can defend himself from a dog while the

personality of the pride of the universe (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) cannot do even this much for him.

(Page 47)

7. The Wahaabis are against performing mystic rites and sophistic practices-meditating, engaging in the

remembrance of Allah and thinking about Him, owing allegiance to spiritual guides and the whole system

of spiritual guides, and having a mental rapport with the spiritual guides, believing in the doctrine of

annihilation and permanent life etc. etc In their view, al such things are of no consequence, bad innovations

and demeaning.

(Page 59, Ash-Shahaubus Saaqib)

8. In Wahaabi belief, following any particular Imam is considered to be blasphemy against the Prophet, and

they use wretched and wicked words for the four Imams and their followers, and thus they are alienated

from the Ahl-e-Sunnat-Wa-Jamaat and so the non-emulators of India belong to this wicked group. While

they claimed to be Hanbalee when they first appeared on the scene, but in many matters they do not follow

Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (Alaihir Rahmah)

(Page 62, Ash-Shahaabus Saaqib).

9. Through verses Ar-Rahmaanu Alal Arshis Tawa etc, the Wahaabis try to prove that Allah physically

occupies a throne and also make out His dimensions and, therefore, His bodily presence. (Page 24, Ash-

Shahaabus-Saaqib)

10. The Wahaabis of Arabia have often been heard to harshly denounce the expression, As Salaatu was

Salaamu Alaika ya Rasoolal Laah (Peace and salutation to you, O Allahs Messenger), and most

scathingly condemn and ridicule its use, and hurl most unbecoming language against the people of the

Haramain who use such an expression.(Page 65, Ash-Shahaabus-Saaqib)



11. The wicked Wahaabis harshly denounce sending repeatedly peace and salutation on the mercy to the

worlds, and consider reciting Dalaailul Khairuat, Qaseedah Burdah and Qassedah Hamziyah and such like

as most detestable and unwarranted. They also consider some couplets of Qaseedah Burdah to be downright

blasphemous, as for example the couplet:

Ya Ashrafal Khalqi Maali Man Aloozu Bihi Siwaaka Inda Huloolil Haadisil Amami

(O. the best of creations! I have no one To look up to in perilous times like these)

(Page 66, Ash Shahaabus Saaqib)

12. Except for the knowledge by him of Allahs commands, the Wahaabis think the personality of the Last

of the Prophets (Alaihis Salaatu Was Salaam) to be devoid of all hidden and true knowledge. (Page 62, Ash-

Shahaabus Saaqib)

13. The Wahaabis consider the narration of the birth of the king of the universe (Alaihis-Salaatu-Was-

Salaam) itself to be a most reprehensible act and a very bad innovation.

(Page 67, Ash-Shahaabus Saaqib)

Compare this with the latest fatwa from Deoband posted above!

SEE MORE DEOBANDI LOVE FOR WAHABIS

( PLZ KEEP IN MIND THAT TO SUNNI ARAB SCHOLARS THESE DEOBANDIS SAID THAT WEHATE WAHABIS AND CONSIDERIBN ABDAL WAHAB AND WAHABIS AS MISGUIDED AND

KHAWARIJ)

1. This title (Wahaabi) means a person who subscribes to, or is subservient, to the creed of IbneAbdul Wahaab. (Imdaad-ul-Fataawa), Page 233.

2. On Page 45 of Ashrafus Sawaanih, it is stated thus: A story is narrated of the times when Ashraf AliThanvi Sahib was a teacher at the Madrasah Jaamiul-Uloom, Kanpur. Some women living in the

neighbourhood of the Madrasah brought some sweets so that the Holy Quraan may be recited and thereward so earned be conveyed. Students of the Madrasah did not do so and ate up the sweets. This created

quite a row. When informed of the row, Thanvi Sahib came and told the people in a loud voice, Brethren!This place is populated by Wahaabis. Dont bring anything here for the sake of faatihah and niyaaz.

3. One Page 192 of the biography of Janab Yoosuf Kandhalvi, it is stated that we are staunchWahaabis.

4. One of the elders of the Deobandi Wahaabi propagandist group, Sheikh-ul-Hadees Muhammad



4. One of the elders of the Deobandi Wahaabi propagandist group, Sheikh-ul-Hadees Muhammad

Zakariya Sahib, declares: I am a more staunch Wahaabi than all of you.(Biography of MaulanaMuhammad Yoosuf Kandhalvi, Page 193, authored by Muhammad Saani Hasni and Manzoor Numaani).

5. If I had Rs 10000 I would have distributed it and people would have automatically becomeWAHABI

- Mawlana Ashraf Ali Thanvee ( Al ifadatul Yaumiya)

SEE Scan here

(http://ahlusunnahwaljamat.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/39.jpg)

View of a Living Deobandi Mufti regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najadi and Wahabis

His View about Wahabis

Can you please explain who are Wahabies (is this a sect), are they also Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jammah

I really would like to know who Wahabies are and what they believe in. Iam hanafi and waswondering what is the difference between us and them. Jazzakallahairun selam

A.) The Wahabis, who call themselves Salafis, are a group who had appeared in the last few centuries andhold beliefs contrary to the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaaah.

They try to pull the wool over our eyes by affiliating themselves with the Salaf (Sahabah and Tabien) but ineffect their beliefs and practices are completely in contradictory with those of the Salaf.



The Wahabis are in essence Mujassimah (anthropomorphists-Those who attribute a body to Allah Taala).

They attribute a hand, leg, face etc to Allah Taala, while the illustrious Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah walJamaah hold fast to the belief that Allah knows best the meaning of these words.

Similar is the case with all the sifat (qualities) etc in the Quran ie. the Wahabis take them on there apparentmeaning , claiming that interpreting the Quran is not permissible, while we say that Allah knows best what

it means or at times we interpret it in a suitable manner.

-The Wahabis reject the permissibility of using a deceased person as a intermediary in dua, while we hold

that it is permissible.

-The Wahabis reject the Ambiyaa being alive in their graves

- The Wahabis hold that Allah is really resting on His throne in the sky, while we hold that this is from theMutashabihaat.(Those unclear statements hose meaning is only known to Allah).

- The Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaaah disagree with the destruction of numerous blessed historicallandmarks by the Wahabis.

-The Ulama of the Ahlus sunnah wal Jamaaah hold that taqleed of one mazhab is necessary, while theWahabis generally do not adhere to a mazhab and claim that following one imam blindly is Bidah andshirk.

-There are dozens of other differences.

The Wahabis are vehement opponents of the Asharis and Maaturidis, who constitute the Ahlus Sunnah Wal

Jamaah and are two groups whose beliefs are correct. They also vehemently oppose tawassuf.

It is necessary for us to be on our guard against them as they are very active propagators of their Baatil and

false beliefs.

View of the same above Mufti regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najadi

[ Compare it with the Official Deobandi view mentioned in AL MUHANNAD and also as stated byShaykh Tandvi al Deobandi}

QuestionWhat do ulemas of deoband consider about Molana Abdul Wahhab? Do you agree that the present form of

wahhbism has nothing to do with teachings of Maulana Abdul Wahhab?

Answer

Your observation is correct. Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhaab [ra] was a reputable and God-fearingAalim of the eighteenth century aligned to the Hanbali Madhab. Sheikh enjoyed unique acceptance and

love across the spectrum of social class. Sheikh, in conjunction with the royal family of the time, wasresponsible for rekindling the love for the Quraan and Sunnah in the populace of the Arabian peninsula.

Unfortunately, subsequent to the death of the Sheikh, his opponents embarked on a vehement campaign ofconcocting erroneous beliefs and views and attributed them to the Sheikh. This, in an attempt to discreditthe Sheikh and to bring about discord between his followers.



When these attempts failed miserably, these opponents rescinded and capitalized on the influence that

Sheikhs name enjoyed and the love of the masses. By hijacking his movement and using it as a vehicle tospread their incorrect views and beliefs. For more information, refer to The Life of Shaykh Abdul Wahhaab

by Sheykh Muhammad Abu Bakr Ghazipuri.

and Allah Taala Knows Best

WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING

Can we see this deobandi tactical shift? The official book of Deobandis states that these deobandis havethe same belef about Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi which is mentioned in Durrul Mukhtar!

By giving this lie , these Deobandi liars managed a Fatwa from sunni Arab scholars of Arabia .

Now this Deobandi mufti was asked :What do ulemas of deoband consider about Molana Abdul

Wahhab?

So let this be known that this deobandi mufti is not only giving his views but also the official view of

Deobandis !

But this is totally against the official view ( as in AL MUHANNAD) !

AL MUHANNAD says ibn abdul wahab was a bad man who killed sunnis and this mufti of deobandis saythat ibn abdul wahab was a good man !

This is called policy of appeasement ! The Deobandi mufti is smart to praise ibn abdul wahab najdi , but hecriticizez wahabis !!

THIS IS YET ANOTHER PROOF THAT AL MUHANNAD WAS WRITTEN TO FOOL THE SUNNIARAB SCHOLARS!

VIEW OF SHAYKH RASHID GANGOHEE ON IBN ABDUL WAHAB NAJDI AND DEOBANDIJUSTIFICATION

Shaykh Rashid Gangohee was asked

Question: What kind of a person was (Muhammad ibn) Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi?

Answer: People call Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab a Wahhabi. He was a good person, and I haveheard that he was a follower of the Hanbali School of Islamic law and acted upon the Hadith. He used to

prevent people from Shirk and innovation (bida), but he was harsh (shadid) in his attitude.

Please Note: I have heard

THE DEOBANDI JUSTIFICTAION

Read this Justification by a Deobandi where in he is trying to prove that , Shaykh Gangohee had this view

because it was based on information which he got ( I HAVE HEARD). Later in this justification it has beentried to prove that Shaykh Gangohee would have chnaged his view , had he known the fact!



Read carefully

The Deobandi Justification says

Mufti Mahmud al-Hasan al-Gangohi (Allah have mercy on him) states in his Fatawa that, Shaykh Rashid

Ahmad (Allah have mercy on him) was initially unaware of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdisposition, because al-Najdi was initially known in the Subcontinent as a reformer of Sunnah, and the one

who strived greatly in rejecting Bida and establishing the Sunnah. As such, the respected Shaykh also saidwhat he had heard, for a Muslim should always hold good opinions about other Muslims until it is proven

otherwise.

The Deobandi Justification continues

Thereafter, the respected Shaykhs mentor and teacher sent him the copy of Radd al-Muhtar whereinAllama Ibn Abidin (Allah have mercy on him) clearly refuted Muhammad ibn Abd al- Wahhab. Allama Ibn

Abidin states:

As it has occurred in our times with the followers of Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi, who appeared from Najd

and imposed their control over the two sacred Harams. They used to attribute themselves to the HanbaliSchool but they believed that only they were Muslims and that who ever opposed their beliefs were

polytheists (mushrik), thus theyconsidered the killing of those who were from the Ahl al-Sunnah and theirscholars to be legitimate, until Allah Most High destroyed their might and power.

(Radd al-Muhtar, 3/339-340, chapter regarding the followers of Abd al-Wahhab, the Khawarij of our times)

And also

had Shaykh Rashid Ahmad read what Allama Ibn Abidin stated in his Radd al-Muhtar regarding theWahhabis, he would surely not have stated what he had in his Fatawa

. Allama Ibn Abidin (Allah have mercy on him) was geographically closer to Najd, thus he was aware at firsthand of what Shaykh Rashid Ahmad, who was living in India, was unaware of. (See: Fatawa

Mahmudiyya, 13/411-412)ANALYSIS

As per this Deobandi Justification, IF shaykh Gangohee would have had acess to the Book DurrulMukhtar ( shami) then he might have not had this GOOD VIEW about Ibn Abdul Wahab!

How ever , this justification also mentions that later Haji Imdadullah (rh ) sent this book to ShaykhGangohee! So when shaykh Gnagohee got this book , why did he not change his views about Ibn AbdulWahab?

And the deobandi books are a witness to this fact that Shaykh Gnagohee became an expert in this bookRaddul Muhtar! This has been stated in manu deobandi books that shaykh Gnagohee was an expert on

Raddul Muhtar and used to issue Fatwa based on this book!

Read this incidence which is mentioned in both Tazkiratur Rashid and Arwahe Salasa !

It states



It states Hazrat Gangohi ( Rashid ahmed) asked his student Mawlana Mohammed Yahya sahib Kandhalvee to

look for some ruling in the book Shami . Mawlana Yahya replied that the particular ruling is not present inthe book. Hazrat Ganho said how can this be possible? Bring the book to me. The book was brought

infront of Hazrat (Rashid Ahmed gangohi).

At that time hazrat ( Rashid ahmed) had already lost his eye sight. He took the book and turned two-third

of the pages to the right and one third to the left and opened a page and said look on the bottom side ofleft page . It was found that the ruling was very much present there. Every one was amazed. Hazrat (

Rashid ahmed ) said Allah has promised me that he will not let anything wrong come come out of mytongue

( Arwahe salasa, page 292)

Can we see? Even when Shaykh Gnagohee was Blind he could locate a particukar matter mentioned in that

book! It means he must have read that book so many times !

But Shaykh Gnagohee did not chnage his view about Ibn Abdul Wahab najdi al Tamimi

CONCLUSION

1.From this it can be derived that holding all Ahl-e-Sunnat to be polytheists and killing them was lawful and

permitted in the eyes of Gangohi Sahib. He also says that the followers of (Ibne Abdul Wahaab) are goodmen, while all other ulama of Deoband hold them to be Kharijis and rebels. It, thus, becomes clear that

Gangohi Sahib believes that Kharijis and rebels are good men.

2. Gangohi Sahib says that their beliefs are excellent and he and his followers are good men, while

Husain Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni says that his views were evil and his beliefs were mostwretched. He considered the killing of Ahle-Sunnat as an act, which brought blessings, and justified taking

away of their properties as spoils of war and, as such, lawful. He put the people of the Haramain and theHijaaz to great hardships until they were forced to flee. He was most insolent towards the pious men of the

earlier generations. He was guilty of killing thousands of Musalmaans, and was tyrannical, rebellious,blood-thirsty, and sinful.

3.Now, if Gangohi Sahib is speaking the truth, then Husain Ahmad Sahib Tandvi Madni is speaking the lie.Only one of two can be in the right. Now, a decision about them rests on the followers of the two men.

4. Gangohi Sahib says that their (Najdis) beliefs are excellent. How excellent can be seen in the writings ofthe Principal of Deoband, Husain Ahmad Sahib t Tandvi Madni, who has listed, serially, examples of the

beliefs of the Najdis in F his book, Ash Shahaubus Saaqib! ( As quoted earlier)

THE WORST PART OF THE WHOLE SITUATION IS THIS :

Darul Uloom Deoband has issued this fatwa regarding Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi

Najdi is called one who is attributed to a great reformer and scholar Hadhrat Shiakh Muhammad ibn



Najdi is called one who is attributed to a great reformer and scholar Hadhrat Shiakh Muhammad ibnAbdul Wahab Najdi ( ). This great reformist was accused of many things; therefore the opponents

attribute us to him for irritating us. It is useful to study the book ?Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahab ke khilafpropaganda aur Hindustan ke Ulam-e- Haq per uske asaraat? written by Hadhrat Maulana Manzoor

Nomani.

Check fatwa id 5177 at this direct link

http://darulifta-deoband.org/viewfatwa.jsp?ID=5177 (http://darulifta-deoband.org/viewfatwa.jsp?ID=5177)

So the official Darul Uloom Deoband has now accepted that they love Ibn Abdul Wahab Najdi and hisAqida was sound . This has also been accepted by a livig Deobandi Mufti!

The deobandis are pleasing wahabis and deceiving sunni muslim population !

1) Many living Deobandi scholars have adopted the policy of appeasement in this modern time. Going

totally against their Officiaal aqida Book Al Muhannad they have praised Ibn Abdal Wahab Najdi andcalled him a man with correct aqida!

In order to continue deceiving the muslims of Ahlus sunnah wal jamah , they have criticised the wahabisin general and have said that wahabis have anthropomorphic belief.

2) This smart move allows deobandis to call themself as wahabis when they are with wahabi populationand they become sunni when they are with sunni population.

3) The official fatwa from Darul Uloom Deoband has praised and approved Ibn Abdal Wahab al najdi.Please check here :

http://darulifta-deoband.org/viewfatwa.jsp?ID=5177 (http://darulifta-deoband.org/viewfatwa.jsp?ID=5177)

Why did they not issue this fatwa in Al Muhannad? Why did deonadi grop hide their aqida when Almuhnnad was presented to sunni arab scholars?

4) Now official Deobandi fatwa is totally against official deobandi aqida as mentioned in ALMUHANNAD.!

5) If Deobandis would have given their fatwa in support of Ibn Abdal Wahab Najdi in their book AL

MUHANNAD , no sunni arab scholars would have signed this book! So it is again proved that ALMUHANNAD was written by Deobandis to fool the sunni arab scholars.

6) The scholars of Ahlus sunnah have always told that AL MUHANNAD is not against Hussamul Harmaynas the confused deobandis claim . Rather it is a book written by Deobandis to fool sunni arab scholars.

7) Alhamdulillah , what we sunnis have been saying has now been proved CORRECT by the deobandisthemself!!

8) My Deobandi brother should examine the whole situation with open mind and heart. Insha Allaheveryone can see the truth



You May Like

1.

Posted on April 24, 2012, in Controversial Topics and tagged abdul, ahle hadith, ahlesunnah, al najdi,arabia, Arabian Peninsula, deoband, deobandi, ibne baz, MUSLIM, najadi, refutation, saudi, sunni, truth ofal muhannad, wahab, wahabi. Bookmark the permalink. Leave a Comment.

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

Blog at WordPress.com. The Mystique Theme.

Follow

About these ads (http://en.wordpress.com/about-

these-ads/)



Follow ahlu sunnah wal jamat

Powered by WordPress.com

Classification and Truth of Al-Muhannad _ Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamat

Documents

Transcript of Classification and Truth of Al-Muhannad _ Ahlu Sunnah Wal Jamat