Classical Criminology (1750s – 1850s) Bentham & Beccaria The Rise of the Prisons & Penitentiary.
-
Upload
matilda-garrett -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of Classical Criminology (1750s – 1850s) Bentham & Beccaria The Rise of the Prisons & Penitentiary.
Classical CriminologyClassical Criminology(1750s – 1850s)(1750s – 1850s) Bentham & Beccaria
The Rise of the Prisons & Penitentiary
Social ContractSocial Contract◦ Rise of Citizen & State◦ Common good
Massive population growth◦ Populations less homogeneous◦ Social bonds weakened◦ 1830s Sir Robert Peel (Britain)
Cash for Labour◦ Individuality (economic &
political)◦ Citizens & the rise of the Nation
State◦ Private v. collective property
Reformation
French Revolution
French RevolutionFrench Revolution
Reign of Terror “devoured its own children”1793 until 1794
Association of Terror with Virtue
NapoleanNapolean
Emperor of the Emperor of the French from 1804 French from 1804 to 1815to 1815
◦TaxationTaxation◦Family namesFamily names◦Millitaristic endsMillitaristic ends
Napoleonic Code/Civil Code 1804
‘All citizens’ were equal before the law*
right to property was inviolable ◦Civil death (1854)
Article 544◦No regulation for
labourers/wages◦Unions illegal
Civil Code Civil Code 18041804
Following the tradition of Roman law, a woman found guilty of adultery could be imprisoned for between 3 months and 2 years depending on the inclination of the husband.
A husband convicted of adultery (a husband had to introduce the mistress into the home to meet the requirement of adultery) was only subject to a fine of from 100 to 2,000 francs.
A man who, in a fit of passion, murdered his spouse in flagrante delicto was guilty of no crime. A woman in the same situation was subject to the rigors of the law. (Holmberg)
Women & The Family Women & The Family Code Code 1974 in Canada (case law)2013 First Nations women…
Law promoted rational control by the central government at the cost of moral emancipation
Individual freedom in so far as one was free to help the state in its pursuit of power.
Bentham - Bentham - UtilitarianismUtilitarianism
Freedom unless harm to others Freedom unless harm to others
-John Stewart Mill & Harriet Taylor -John Stewart Mill & Harriet Taylor expand upon Bentham’s quantificationexpand upon Bentham’s quantification
...since the world is not harmonious, you ...since the world is not harmonious, you must choose the least bad, the greatest must choose the least bad, the greatest happiness of the greatest number. happiness of the greatest number.
Individual freedom is limited to social Individual freedom is limited to social utilityutility
Response to paternalistic and moral Response to paternalistic and moral governancegovernance
Classical CriminologyClassical Criminology
Cesare BeccariaEssays On Crime and
Punishment,1764
Jeremy BenthamPrincipals & Morals of Legislation,1789
“If there is no demonstratable victims, there should be no punishment”
Cecare Beccaria (1738 – Cecare Beccaria (1738 – 1794) 1794) Upper class ItalianDissidents in Milan
◦ “School of Fists”◦ Legal reformers
Response to:Demonic Social ControlCorruption & independent
judges
Essay in Crime and Essay in Crime and PunishmentPunishment 1764
“...a systematic plan for making legal social control more humane and rational” (Pfohl, 1985:55)
Wide appealHarsh arbitrary
punishment loses favour
Principles of Principles of Crime and Crime and PunishmentPunishment
Necessity of Rational Punishment
Preservation of social contract
Remind individuals of common interest in social order
Defense of public liberty
(not tyranny)
Principles of Principles of Crime and Crime and PunishmentPunishment
Legislated Law & Judicial Guilt
Legislators: Define acts that violate
common good Assign appropriate punishment
Judges: Determine guilt/innocence
Principles of Principles of Crime and Crime and PunishmentPunishment
Purpose of social control: Deterrence
Specific and general Swift & certain justice
when a punishment quickly follows a crime, then the two ideas of “crime” and “punishment” will be more quickly associated in a person’s mind.
Control the Act not Actor
Problematic to thesis
All actors assumed to have same ‘free will’ & hedonistic calculators
Principles of Principles of Crime and Crime and PunishmentPunishment
Jeremy Bentham (1748 -Jeremy Bentham (1748 -1832)1832)
Detailed classification of pleasure and pain
1.Intensity2.Duration3.Un/certainty4.Proximity5.Fecundity (chance of
it being continued)6.Purity (chance NOT
continued)7.Extent
Sir Bentham Sir Bentham loses his head...loses his head...
Bentham: The PanopticonBentham: The PanopticonThe Total PrisonThe Total PrisonDeveloped idea living in Russia (1785)Constant surveillanceManipulative & Communicative
Exercising powerPerformance of power
Never constructed (Bentham) although its effects can be found in prison architecture..
Widespread appeal of prison – practical implementation of classical
thinking....
Foucault’s Critique of Foucault’s Critique of PanopticonPanopticon
Docile Bodies◦ natural/normal
Exercising power◦ Rehabilitation
Critiques....Critiques....French Penal Code 1791
Applied classical thinkingOverreliance on incarceration◦Inconsistent with utilitarian thesis
(Foucault)
Neoclassical ModificationsDiscretion◦Premeditation◦Mitigating circumstances◦Insanity
We become ordered We become ordered through...through...SurveillanceEfficiencyBureaucracyExpertise