Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

24
Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Causality of US Sulfur Production and Emission Trends By James Agan, Kate Miller, Cat Reid, Jason Reynolds Instructor Rudolf B. Husar Washington University, St. Louis, MO

description

Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality. Causality of US Sulfur Production and Emission Trends By James Agan, Kate Miller, Cat Reid, Jason Reynolds Instructor Rudolf B. Husar Washington University, St. Louis, MO. Instructions. Alan: 3, 6, 10, 11, 12 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Page 1: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Causality of US Sulfur Production and Emission Trends

By

James Agan, Kate Miller, Cat Reid, Jason Reynolds

Instructor

Rudolf B. Husar

Washington University, St. Louis, MO

Page 2: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Instructions

• Alan: 3, 6, 10, 11, 12

• Kate: 17- 23

• Cat: 4, 5, 14, 15, 16

• Jason: 7, 8, 9, 13, 24

• For each slide, add a very concise but informative description; 2-3 bullets

• It should contain key facts or observations

• Enter these under the slide in the ‘speakers note’

Page 3: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Population - Energy/Goods Consumption– Materials Flow - Emissions

Ek = cjk EMj = bij cjk GEi = ai bij cjk P

Industr. Energy

Transp. Energy

ResCom.Engy

Coal

Oil

GasElectric Energy

SOx

NOx

HC

PM

Goods &Energy,(GE) i Fuels&Mater.(FM), j Emission (EM), k

Ind. Chemicals

Industr. Goods

Pop., P

Metals

Mercury

ai

Consump./Person

bij

Fuels/Energy

cjk

Emission/Fuel-

j ji i i j

Consumption of Goods and Energy: GE = ai P

Fuels and Materials Flow: FM = ai bij P

Emission of Pollutants: EM = ai bij cjk P

Industrial Prod.

Transportation

ResComercial

EconMeasure(EM)

Page 4: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

US Population Trends

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

1900 1950 2000 2050

Mill

ions

-3.00%

-2.00%

-1.00%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

1900 1950 2000 2050

Births Deaths Migration

Page 5: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Regional Population Projections

Regional Population Projections

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Year

Popu

lation

(tho

usan

ds)

R1 - Pacific Coast R2 - Mountain States R3 - Southwest

R4 - Great Plains R5 - Great Lakes R6 - South

R7 - Northeast R8 - Noncontinental US

Cat, place here a regional trend relative to 1995 to see regional growth rates

Use this map to show regions

Page 6: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

National Income by Industry Group/Person

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

1900 1950 2000 2050 2100

Inco

me,

$ (

1996

)

Res/com

Industrial

Transportation 0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1900 1950 2000 2050 2100

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

1900 1950 2000 2050 2100

Fraction of Total Income

Trend by Ind. Group

1970 = 1

Page 7: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Coal Production and S Content

• The high concentration of sulfur is found in the eastern coal mined in the US.

• Significant coal production is in the west with a much lower sulfur concentration, allowing for less sulfur pollution without decreasing consumption.

Page 8: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Sulfur Transfer by Fuels and Minerals: Theory

• An understanding of the flow of sulfur is paramount in moving toward sustainability.• Know how much is produce, how much flows to the consumer, and how much makes it

to the receptors provides a way to monitor and catch the sulfur before it makes it into the atmosphere, water, soil and etc.

Page 9: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Coal Sulfur Flow in 1980 and 1998

• They coal sulfur flow was very dense in the 1980, mainly because sulfur retention was very poor.

• Rounding the turn of the century sulfur recovery had greatly improve reducing the flow of sulfur.

• Also legislation had put restrictions on the amount of sulfur that any establishment could produce decreasing the amount of sulfur able to flow.

Page 10: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

US Coal Production by Region

• Coal production in the US occurred over five major producing regions.• The coal production over the eastern US has remained roughly constant throughout the century.• The sharp increase since the 1980s is due to the addition of western coal.

Page 11: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Trend of Average Coal S Content

Page 12: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Flue Gas Desulfurisation (FGD) of El. Util. Coal

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

1900 1950 2000 2050

Ca

pa

city

, G

iga

Wa

tts

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

Fra

cti

on

FGD Capacity Coal El. Util.Capacity FGD Fraction

Page 13: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Sulfur Recovery

• Nature recycles the its sulfur, thus reaching a sustainable level for life.• Man has not reached a sustainable level for sulfur, because the amount

recovered has not been good in past years.• The amounts recovered has drastically changed over the year especially in

some sulfur producing processes moving us to sustainability.

Page 14: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Sulfur Flow Diagram (Tentative)

Mineral Mining Production Consumption

AirLandWater

S Stocks Exp/Imp Raw

Fuel Mining Refining Combustion

Minerals Flow for GoodsMetals, Frasch, Pyrites

Fuels Flow for EnergyCoal, Oil, Gas

Exp/Imp Proc

Ex/Im Raw Ex/Im Processed

Exp/Imp AirEx/Im Water

S as Pollution S as Goods

Page 15: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

US Industrial Sulfur: Supply and Demand Trend

US S Budget

S StocksExp/Imp

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1900 1950 2000 2050

ExportsImports

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1900 1950 2000 2050

US SupplyConsumption

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

1900 1950 2000 2050

Sulfur Stock

Stock Change

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1900 1950 2000 2050

S RecoveredS Mined

US S Supply US S Demand

Source http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/of01-006/sulfur.xls

Page 16: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Total S Mobilized and Recovered

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1900 1950 2000 2050

Mill

ion

Ton

s/yr

CoalSMob OilSMob NGasSMobil

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1900 1950 2000 2050

Mill

ion

To

ns/

yr

PetroleumSRec NatGasSRec MetalSRec

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1900 1950 2000 2050

Mill

ion

To

ns/

yr

Pyrites S Mined Frash S Mined MetalsSMob

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1900 1950 2000 2050

S RecoveredTotMobilized

Mobilized in Fuels

Mobilized in Minerals

Recovered from Fuels &

Min.

Page 17: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

SOx Emission Trend By Industry Group and by

Fuel/Material

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040

ElUtil Ind RecComm Transport Metals Total

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1.00

1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040

ElUtil Ind RecComm Transport Metals

Page 18: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Electric Utility

FUEL COM B. ELEC. UTIL.

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

14000

16000

18000

20000

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

SO

2, 1

00 T

on

s/yr

El. Util CoalTot OilTot GasTot OtherTot

Page 19: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Industrial

FUEL COM B. INDUSTRIAL

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

SO

2, 1

000

Tons

/ye

Industrial CoalTot OilTot GasTot OtherTot

CHEMICAL & ALLIED PRODUCT MFG

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

SO

2, 1

000

To

ns/

yr

Chemical sulfur compounds

Other Chemical Mfg Agricultural Chemical Mfg

PETROLEUM & RELATED INDUSTRIES

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

SO

2, 1

000

Tons

/yr

Petroleum Petroleum Ref ineries & Related Industries other pretroleum

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

OtherInd Wood, Pulp & Paper cement mfg other

Page 20: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Commercial-Residential

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Other Fuel ComCoal CommOil ResCoal ResOil

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

MiscArea Other Combustion

Page 21: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Metals Processing

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Metal copper lead Ferrous Metals Processing

Page 22: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Transportation

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

On Road Light-Duty Gas Vehicles & MotorcyclesLight-Duty Gas Trucks Heavy-Duty Gas VehiclesDiesels

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

NonRoad Marine Vessels Railroads Non-Road Diesel

Page 23: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

SOX Emission Factors for Industry Groups

Page 24: Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality

Sox Emission Scenario: 2000-2050

• National average moved from 2% about 1% since 1980• Cause: A mix of western coal (.5% sulfur) and Eastern coal (2%

sulfur)• If trend continues the national average will be .5% thus half of the

quantity produced today