Class 8: Open Science, Data and Commons...Organizing in Times of Crisis: The Case of Covid-19...
22
Organizing in Times of Crisis: The Case of Covid-19 Leonhard Dobusch April 2020 University of Innsbruck Class 8: Open Science, Data and Commons
Transcript of Class 8: Open Science, Data and Commons...Organizing in Times of Crisis: The Case of Covid-19...
Organizing in Times of Crisis: The Case of Covid-19
Leonhard Dobusch
April 2020University of Innsbruck
Class 8: Open Science, Data and Commons
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants.“
Isaac Newton
>>>Mertonian Science Communism
All scientists should have common ownership of scientific goods, to promote collective collaboration; secrecy is the opposite of this norm.
Merton (1942)
I hereby assign to [scientific publisher] exclusively all my right, title and interest in said article, including without limitation the copyright therein.
“Source: standard copyright form of a large academic publisher
Source: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/survey-most-give-thumbs-pirated-papers
Sci-Hub: 28 million downloads in 6 months
31.5.2016 Tell us what you think about Sci-Hub—Love it or Hate it? – Beantwortungen | SurveyMonkey
https://de.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-PQX56R8R/ 1/4
Tweet Share
10937 responses
4/21/2016 - 5/5/2016
224 views
Tell us what you think about Sci-Hub—Love it or
Hate it?
Share ShareQ1
Q2
Q3
12.13% 1,315
87.87% 9,526
Do you think it is wrong to download
pirated papers?
Answered: 10,841 Skipped: 96
Total 10,841
Yes
No
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Antwortoptionen Beantwortungen
Yes
No
41.11% 4,470
33.27% 3,618
25.62% 2,786
Have you used Sci-Hub, and if so, how
often?
Answered: 10,874 Skipped: 63
Total 10,874
Never
A few times
Daily or weekly
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Antwortoptionen Beantwortungen
Never
A few times
Daily or weekly
Have you used other repositories of pirated
journal articles, or used the twitter hashtag
#IcanhazPDF to obtain a paper.
Answered: 10,817 Skipped: 120
Source: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/survey-most-give-thumbs-pirated-papers
Publication Process
Submission Editorreads submission
„Desk Rejection“ Editor letter explaining the decision
Sends out manuscript to two to four reviewers
Editor makes a decision
Editor makes a decision
(maybe after consulting the reviwers)
Article gets published
Inivation to revise and resubmit („R&R“)
Sign a copyright form
Scientific Publication Process
Publication Process
Submission Editorreads submission
„Desk Rejection“ Editor letter explaining the decision
Sends out manuscript to two to four reviewers
Editor makes a decision
Editor makes a decision
(maybe after consulting the reviwers)
Article gets published
Inivation to revise and resubmit („R&R“)
Sign a copyright form
Scientific Publication Process
Open Formats Open
Licenses
Open Access
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research & Innovation
Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data
in Horizon 2020
Version 2.1
15 February 2016
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research & Innovation
Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data
in Horizon 2020
Version 2.1
15 February 2016
ERC Executive Agency Place Rogier 16, COV2 21/132, BE-1049 Brussels, Belgium I Tel: +32 2 299 45 89 I Fax +32 2 299 45 89 I [email protected] I http://erc.europa.eu I
Brussels, ERCEA/12.04.2016
Dear grantee of the European Research Council,
You are the Principal Investigator of an ERC grant funded under Horizon 2020, and we would like to provide you with important information regarding the requirements for open access to publications.
Please be reminded that you have an obligation to ensure open access to all peer-reviewed scientific publications related to the results of the ERC project. We would like to emphasize that the mandatory open access for ERC projects in H2020 applies not only to peer reviewed journal articles, but to all types of peer reviewed scientific publications, including books and monographs.
You can ensure open access through the green (self-archiving) or gold (publishing open access) route.
Choosing green open access means that you provide open access by depositing a copy of the final peer-reviewed manuscript (or published version) in a repository. Open access should be provided as soon as possible and in any case no later than six months after the official publication date. For publications in the Social Sciences and Humanities domain a delay of up to twelve months is acceptable.
Choosing gold open access means ensuring that an electronic version will be available for free via the publisher. Be aware that also in these cases, a copy of the publication must be deposited in a repository, at the latest on publication (either by the publisher or the researcher).
These are the main open access obligations in your grant agreement and we advise you to read the full text of the relevant article (29.2) with more details, at the end of this letter.
The ERC strongly encourages ERC funded researchers to use discipline-specific repositories for their publications. The recommended repository for Life Sciences is Europe PubMed Central (http://europepmc.org) and for Physical Sciences and Engineering arXiv (http://arxiv.org/). The recommended repository for monographs, book chapters and other long-text publications is the OAPEN Library (http://oapen.org). Institutional repositories and centralised repositories are also acceptable.
Open access fees are eligible costs that may be charged to the ERC grant, if they incur in the duration of the projects, even if this was not planned in the original budget. There is however no additional funding for this type of costs. Be reminded that as stated in your
Open Access Mandates by Funding Institutions
Open Access Publishing (peer-reviewed)
Volume 169 ( 2016 )
Please note that the articles in this issue were handled by the previous editorial team: Johan Rooryck, Anikó Lipták, Anne-Michelle Tessier, Chung-hye Han and Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
International Review of General
Linguistics
Revue Internationale de
Linguistique Générale
Interim editor
H. Whitaker
Amsterdam – Boston – London – New York – Oxford – Philadelphia – San Diego – St. Louis
Volume 169 ( 2016 )
Please note that the articles in this issue were handled by the previous editorial team: Johan Rooryck, Anikó Lipták, Anne-Michelle Tessier, Chung-hye Han and Ianthi Maria Tsimpli
International Review of General
Linguistics
Revue Internationale de
Linguistique Générale
Interim editor
H. Whitaker
Amsterdam – Boston – London – New York – Oxford – Philadelphia – San Diego – St. Louis
>>Context: https://governancexborders.com/2015/11/07/open-access-and-the-power-of-editorial-boards-why-elsevier-plays-hardball-with-deviant-linguists/
From Open Access to Open Science
“Katja Mayer
Open Science is the idea that scientific knowledge of all kinds should be openly shared as early as is practical in the research process.
Open Access
Open (Research) Data / Materials
Open Source / Open Methods
Open Instructions
Open Education
Open Evaluation
Citizen Science
O P
E N
S
C I
E N
C E
Foto: Ralf Rebmann, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Katja_Mayer_1.jpg, CC BY-SA 4.0 International
Open Access
Open (Research) Data / Materials
Open Source / Open Methods
Open Instructions
Open Education
Open Evaluation
Citizen Science
O P
E N
S
C I
E N
C E
Screenshot:https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov
Open Access
Open (Research) Data / Materials
Open Source / Open Methods
Open Instructions
Open Education
Open Evaluation
Citizen Science
O P
E N
S
C I
E N
C E
Screenshot: https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/covid-19-coronavirus-data
Open Access
Open (Research) Data / Materials
Open Source / Open Methods
Open Instructions
Open Education
Open Evaluation
Citizen Science
O P
E N
S
C I
E N
C E
Screenshot:https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov
Open Access
Open (Research) Data / Materials
Open Source / Open Methods
Open Instructions
Open Education
Open Evaluation
Citizen Science
O P
E N
S
C I
E N
C E
Screenshot:https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/global-research-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov
Open Access
Open (Research) Data / Materials
Open Source / Open Methods
Open Instructions
Open Education
Open Evaluation
Citizen Science
O P
E N
S
C I
E N
C E
Open peer review‣ Open identities
‣ Open reports
‣ Open participation
Credit: CC-BY-SA AJ Cann, via https://www.fosteropenscience.eu/learning/open-peer-review
Preprint server‣ Scientific peers
‣ Media audiences
Open Access
Open (Research) Data / Materials
Open Source / Open Methods
Open Instructions
Open Education
Open Evaluation
Citizen Science
O P
E N
S
C I
E N
C E
How to organize science more openly?
Organizing Open Strategies in Science
Levels
Source: Taken from Brian Nosek https://osf.io/r9v3p/ and https://cos.io/blog/strategy-culture-change Source: Presentation by Maximilian Heimstädt and Katja Mayer
Goals ‣ Sharing and collaboration ‣ Transparency and reproducibility ‣ Re-usability and new applications ‣ Societal participation and feedback
loops
E-Mail: [email protected] Twitter: @leonidobusch Web: bit.ly/LD-UIBK // dobusch.net
Research blogs:osconjunction.netgovernancexborders.com
Contact
References
‣ Dobusch, L., & Heimstädt, M. (2019). Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review. Management Learning, 50(5), 607-619.
‣ Fecher, B., & Friesike, S. (2014). Open science: one term, five schools of thought. In Opening science (pp. 17-47). Springer.
‣ Mayer, K. (2018): Open Science, all or nothing?, https://zenodo.org/record/1889751#.XpnCHlMzYWo
‣ Merton, R. K. (1973) [1942]. The Normative Structure of Science. In: Merton, R. K. (ed.), The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, ISBN 978-0-226-52091-9, OCLC 755754
�22
