Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

23
Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007
  • date post

    22-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    213
  • download

    0

Transcript of Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Page 1: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Class 3:Opportunity Identification (Stage 1)

January 30, 2007

Page 2: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Lead User Research

Page 3: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

General Principle of Lead User Research

Extreme versus Means

Identification of functionally novel products and service concepts should be done at the leading edge of markets and applications

Evaluation of commercial potential should be done at the “means” of markets and market segments

Page 4: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Important Innovations by Consumers

Category Health Products Personal Care Sports Food Office Computers Apparel

Example Gatorade Protein-based Shampoo Mountain Bike Chocolate Milk White-out Liquid E-mail, Desktop Publishing Sports Bra

Page 5: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Definitions of Innovation Sources

An innovation is a user innovation when the developer (firm or individual) expects to benefit by using it.

An innovation is a manufacturer innovation when the developer expects to benefit by manufacturing and selling it.

The Lead User research process targets directly user innovations and funnels them into a firm’s development process

Page 6: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Benefiting from Lead Users

Lead User innovations form the basis for new products and service of value to manufacturers.

Lead Users Have new product or service needs that will be

general to the marketplace, but they face them months or years before the bulk of the market

Expect to benefit significantly by finding a solution to those needs

Page 7: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Adopter Categorization on the Basis of Innovativeness Lead users are not the same as “early adopters”

Page 8: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Examples with Lead Users

Hearing Aids Woodworking Tools

Page 9: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Does the LU approach work?

Natural experiment conducted at 3M on the effect of the LU process compared to more traditional processes Funded LU ideas had forecast sales in Year 5 that were 8

times higher than other funded projects in the same time period ($146M vs. $18M)

Funded LU ideas had significantly higher novelty, addressed more original customer needs and had significantly higher forecasted market share in year 5 than those from more conventional methods

Page 10: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Scenario Planning

Page 11: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

The trouble with the future is that there are so many of them.

-John R. Pierce (Bell Labs)

Page 12: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Scenario Planning

Page 13: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Scenario Planning

Scenario planning provides a platform to imagine variable futures resulting in a portfolio of actionable strategies. There is no excuse to be surprised. Only by anticipating the future can we hope to shape it.

In a nutshell, scenario planning is the projection of environments into the future to test current and proposed strategic and policy assumptions.  It is a disciplined way of thinking about the future that uses a clear methodology to analyze the impact of social, economic, political and industry trends.   

Page 14: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Scenarios

Scenario are structured accounts of possible futures

Page 15: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Scenario Planning at Royal Dutch Shell (early 1970s)

Pierre Wack, a planner in the London offices of Royal Dutch Shell worked in the newly developed Group Planning Division (Shell was 11th in the world) Looking for events that might change the price of oil:

The US was beginning to exhaust its oil reserves US demand for oil was growing steadily OPEC was showing signs of flexing its political muscles

(most members were Islamic and bitterly resented Western support of Israel after the 1967 six-day Arab/Israeli war)

Arabs could demand much higher prices for their oil

Page 16: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Scenario Planning at Royal Dutch Shell (early 1970s)

Pierre Wack came up with 2 basic scenarios:

The usual option at Shell

Oil prices would remain stable A miracle would have to occur (e.g. new oil fields in non-

Arab countries)

Oil price crisis sparked by OPEC

Oil prices would rise

Page 17: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Scenario Planning at Anglo American (a South African mining corporation)

Early 1990s (Pierre Wack left Shell to consult) came up with 4 scenarios that were widely publicized in South Africa: Ostrich

Negotiations to end apartheid fail; minority rule continues Lame Duck

Transition to majority rule is slow, complicated, indecisive Icarus

Transition is successful but new government enacts unsustainable, populist economic policies leading to an economic crisis

Flight of the Flamingos Transition is successful. Gradual improvement in the social and

economic status of South Africans occurs as diverse groups work together

Page 18: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Challenging Inertia

Do an assumption analysis List key uncertainties Opportunities appear

Embrace the uncertainties with Scenario Planning

Page 19: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

The following conditions suggest the use of scenario planning:

Uncertainty is high relative to a managers’ ability to predict or adjust

The person/company does not perceive or generate new opportunities

Too many costly surprises have occurred in the past The industry has or will experience significant

change The company wants a common language and

framework without stifling diversity There are strong differences of opinion, with multiple

opinions having merit

Page 20: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Example: Global Uncertainties (mid-80’s)

Key Uncertainties Trade conflict between USA and Japan Arms negotiations between USA and USSR Spread of AIDS Impact of Europe 1992 Deterioration of ozone layer and hole Continuation of Apartheid

Page 21: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Combining 2 Key Uncertainties

USA / Japan

USA/USSR

ArmsRace

Detente

Accommodation Trade Conflict

ImperialTwilight

IndustrialRenaissance

ProtractedTransition

X

Page 22: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

A Scenario Planning Exercise

Scenario Planning Stages

I) If you could consult the oracle at Delphi, what 3 questions would you ask?

II) Identify other key uncertainties III) Pick the 2 most important and dichotomize them (vote) IV) List the main stakeholders & their interests/positions V) List the main long-term trends and assess the impact

of each trend on this organization (+, 0, -, ?) VI) Fill in the matrix, pick one cell to examine in depth

Page 23: Class 3: Opportunity Identification (Stage 1) January 30, 2007.

Opportunity Identification

Scenario Development Have the group members take on the roles of the

different possible players in the scenario & discuss details of the situation (how specifically would your party be impacted)

What new opportunities or needs emerge in this new “world”?