Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

46
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT Professor John Mulcahy CFA, CIPM Hult International Business School San Francisco Campus Module B: January-March 2014

description

 

Transcript of Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Page 1: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

FINANCIALMANAGEMENTProfessor John Mulcahy CFA, CIPMHult International Business SchoolSan Francisco CampusModule B: January-March 2014

Page 2: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Former SEC Chairwoman Mary Schapiro

• Current Chairwoman Mary Jo White

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 3: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Objectives for Session 16• Diversification of Risk

• Systematic (“Market”); Non-systematic (“Idiosyncratic”)

• The Market Premium• Beta and CAPM: Tool for determining cost of Capital• Determining the cost of Debt Capital

• Two Methods• YTM (includes cost of default)• Debt Beta and CAPM

WACC = Weighted Average of Cost of Equity and cost of Debt (adjusted for Tax savings)

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 4: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Figure 10.6 The Historical Tradeoff Between Risk and Return in Large Portfolios

Source: CRSP, Morgan Stanley Capital International

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 5: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

The Returns of Individual Stocks• Is there a positive relationship between volatility and

average returns for individual stocks?

• As shown on the next slide, there is no precise relationship between volatility and average return for individual stocks.

• Larger stocks tend to have lower volatility than smaller stocks.

• All stocks tend to have higher risk and lower returns than large portfolios.

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 6: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Figure 10.7 Historical Volatility and Return for 500 Individual Stocks, Ranked Annually by Size

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 7: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.5 Common Versus Independent Risk• Common Risk

• Risk that is perfectly correlated• Risk that affects all securities

• Independent Risk• Risk that is uncorrelated

• Risk that affects a particular security

• Diversification• The averaging out of independent risks in a

large portfolio

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 8: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.6 Diversification in Stock Portfolios• Firm-Specific Versus Systematic Risk

• Firm Specific News

• Good or bad news about an individual company

• Market-Wide News

• News that affects all stocks, such as news about the economy

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 9: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.6 Diversification in Stock Portfolios (cont'd)• Firm-Specific Versus Systematic Risk

• Independent Risks

• Due to firm-specific news

• Also known as:• Firm-Specific Risk

• Idiosyncratic Risk

• Unique Risk

• Unsystematic Risk

• Diversifiable Risk

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 10: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.6 Diversification in Stock Portfolios (cont'd)• Firm-Specific Versus Systematic Risk

• Common Risks

• Due to market-wide news

• Also known as:• Systematic Risk

• Undiversifiable Risk

• Market Risk

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 11: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.6 Diversification in Stock Portfolios (cont'd)• Firm-Specific Versus Systematic Risk

• When many stocks are combined in a large portfolio, the firm-specific risks for each stock will average out and be diversified.

• The systematic risk, however, will affect all firms and will not be diversified.

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 12: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

No Arbitrage and the Risk Premium• The risk premium for diversifiable risk is zero, so investors

are not compensated for holding firm-specific risk.

• If the diversifiable risk of stocks were compensated with an additional risk premium, then investors could buy the stocks, earn the additional premium, and simultaneously diversify and eliminate the risk.

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 13: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

No Arbitrage and the Risk Premium (cont'd)• The risk premium of a security is determined by its

systematic risk and does not depend on its diversifiable risk.

• This implies that a stock’s volatility, which is a measure of total risk (that is, systematic risk plus diversifiable risk), is not especially useful in determining the risk premium that investors will earn.

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 14: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

No Arbitrage and the Risk Premium (cont'd)• Standard deviation is not an appropriate measure of risk

for an individual security. There should be no clear relationship between volatility and average returns for individual securities. Consequently, to estimate a security’s expected return, we need to find a measure of a security’s systematic risk.

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 15: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Textbook Example 10.7

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 16: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Textbook Example 10.7 (cont'd)

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 17: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.7 Measuring Systematic Risk• To measure the systematic risk of a stock, determine how

much of the variability of its return is due to systematic risk versus unsystematic risk.

• To determine how sensitive a stock is to systematic risk, look at the average change in the return for each 1% change in the return of a portfolio that fluctuates solely due to systematic risk.

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 18: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.7 Measuring Systematic Risk (cont'd)• Efficient Portfolio

• A portfolio that contains only systematic risk. There is no way to reduce the volatility of the portfolio without lowering its expected return.

• Market Portfolio• An efficient portfolio that contains all shares and securities in the

market• The S&P 500 is often used as a proxy for the

market portfolio.

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 19: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.7 Measuring Systematic Risk (cont'd)• Sensitivity to Systematic Risk: Beta (β)

• The expected percent change in the excess return of a security for a 1% change in the excess return of the market portfolio.

• Beta differs from volatility. Volatility measures total risk (systematic plus unsystematic risk), while beta is a measure of only systematic risk.

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 20: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Alternative Example 10.8• Problem:

• Suppose the market portfolio tends to increase by 52% when the economy is strong and decline by 21% when the economy is weak.

• What is the beta of a type S firm whose return is 55% on average when the economy is strong and -24% when the economy is weak?

• What is the beta of a type I firm that bears only idiosyncratic, firm-specific risk?

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 21: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Alternative Example 10.8 (cont’d)• Solution:

• The systematic risk of the strength of the economy produces a 52% - (-21%) = 73% change in the return of the market portfolio.

• The type S firm’s return changes by 55% - (-24%) = 79% on average.

• Thus the firm’s beta is βS = 79%/73% = 1.082. That is, each 1% change in the return of the market portfolio leads to a 1.082% change in the type S firm’s return on average.

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 22: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

12.3 Beta Estimation• Estimating Beta from Historical Returns

• Recall, beta is the expected percent change in the excess return of the security for a 1% change in the excess return of the market portfolio.

• Consider Cisco Systems stock and how it changes with the market portfolio.

Page 23: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Figure 12.1 Monthly Returns for Cisco Stock and for the S&P 500, 2000-2012

Page 24: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Figure 12.2 Scatterplot of Monthly Excess Returns for Cisco Versus the S&P 500, 2000-2012

Page 25: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

12.3 Beta Estimation (cont'd)• Estimating Beta from Historical Returns

• As the scatterplot on the previous slide shows, Cisco tends to be up when the market is up, and vice versa.

• We can see that a 10% change in the market’s return corresponds to about a 20% change in Cisco’s return. • Thus, Cisco’s return moves about two for one with the overall market, so

Cisco’s beta is about 2.

Page 26: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.7 Measuring Systematic Risk (cont'd)• Interpreting Beta (β)

• A security’s beta is related to how sensitive its underlying revenues and cash flows are to general economic conditions. Stocks in cyclical industries are likely to be more sensitive to systematic risk and have higher betas than stocks in less sensitive industries.

• What do you think the Beta of Jones Electrical would be ?

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 27: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.8 Beta and the Cost of Capital• Estimating the Risk Premium

• Market risk premium

• The market risk premium is the reward investors expect to earn for holding a portfolio with a beta of 1.

Market Risk Premium Mkt fE R r

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 28: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Class Exercise:What would be the best proxy for the “Market Portfolio”?Using that proxy, estimate the Market Premium.

Source: CRSP, Morgan Stanley Capital International

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 29: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

10.8 Beta and Cost of Capital (cont'd)• Adjusting for Beta

• Estimating a Traded Security’s Cost of Capital of an investment from Its Beta

Risk-Free Interest Rate Risk Premium

( )

f Mkt f

E R

r E R r

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

This is the Capital Asset Pricing Model, equation 10.11 in the text.

Page 30: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Alternative Example 10.9• Problem

• Assume the economy has a 60% chance of the market return will 15% next year and a 40% chance the market return will be 5% next year.

• Assume the risk-free rate is 6%.

• If Microsoft’s beta is 1.18, what is its expected return next year?

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 31: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Alternative Example 10.9 (cont’d)• Solution

• E[RMkt] = (60% × 15%) + (40% × 5%) = 11%

• E[R] = rf + β ×(E[RMkt] − rf )

• E[R] = 6% + 1.18 × (11% − 6%)

• E[R] = 6% + 5.9% = 11.9%

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 32: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Figure 10.7 Historical Volatility and Return for 500 Individual Stocks, Ranked Annually by Size

Financial Management; Hult International Business School; J. Mulcahy; 2014

Page 33: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Figure 11.5 Portfolios of Intel and Coca-Cola Allowing for Short Sales

Page 34: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Figure 11.8 Efficient Frontier with Ten Stocks Versus Three Stocks

Page 35: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Figure 11.12 The Capital Market Line and the Security Market Line

Page 36: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Figure 11.12 The Capital Market Line and the Security Market Line, panel (a)

(a) The CML depicts portfolios combining the risk-free investment and the efficient portfolio, and shows the highest expected return that we can attain for each level of volatility. According to the CAPM, the market portfolio is on the CML and all other stocks and portfolios contain diversifiable risk and lie to the right of the CML, as illustrated for Exxon Mobil (XOM).

Page 37: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Figure 11.12 The Capital Market Line and the Security Market Line, panel (b)

(b) The SML shows the expected return for each security as a function of its beta with the market. According to the CAPM, the market portfolio is efficient, so all stocks and portfolios should lie on the SML.

Page 38: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

12.4 The Debt Cost of Capital• Debt Yields

• Yield to maturity is the IRR an investor will earn from holding the bond to maturity and receiving its promised payments.

• If there is little risk the firm will default, yield to maturity is a reasonable estimate of investors’ expected rate of return.

• If there is significant risk of default, yield to maturity will overstate investors’ expected return.

Page 39: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

12.4 The Debt Cost of Capital (cont’d)• Consider a one-year bond with YTM of y. For each $1

invested in the bond today, the issuer promises to pay $(1+y) in one year.

• Suppose the bond will default with probability p, in which case bond holders receive only $(1+y-L), where L is the expected loss per $1 of debt in the event of default.

Page 40: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

12.4 The Debt Cost of Capital (cont’d)• So the expected return of the bond is:

rd = (1-p)y + p(y-L) = y - pL

= Yield to Maturity – Prob(default) X Expected Loss Rate

• The importance of the adjustment depends on the riskiness of the bond.

Page 41: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Table 12.2 Annual Default Rates by Debt Rating (1983–2011)

Page 42: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

12.4 The Debt Cost of Capital (cont’d)• The average loss rate for unsecured debt is 60%.• According to Table 12.2, during average times the annual

default rate for B-rated bonds is 5.5%.• So the expected return to B-rated bondholders during

average times is 0.055X0.60=3.3% below the bond’s quoted yield.

Page 43: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

12.4 The Debt Cost of Capital (cont’d)• Debt Betas

• Alternatively, we can estimate the debt cost of capital using the CAPM.

• Debt betas are difficult to estimate because corporate bonds are traded infrequently.

• Chapter 21 shows a method for estimating debt betas.• One approximation is to use estimates of betas of bond indices by

rating category.

Page 44: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

Table 12.3 Average Debt Betas by Rating and Maturity

Page 45: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

12.5 A Project’s Cost of Capital (cont’d)

• Asset (unlevered) cost of capital• Expected return required by investors to hold the firm’s underlying

assets.• Weighted average of the firm’s equity and debt costs of capital

U E D

E Dr = r + r

E+D E+D

Page 46: Class 16 fin_mgmnt_slides_jmm2014p

12.5 A Project’s Cost of Capital (cont’d)

• Asset (unlevered) beta

U E D

E Dβ = β + β

E+D E+D