Claire Wallace Presentation - Soci
Transcript of Claire Wallace Presentation - Soci
Inhibitors of Plasmodium Falciparum Calcium‐Inhibitors of Plasmodium Falciparum CalciumDependent Protein Kinase 1 (PfCDPK1), a Novel Target
for the Potential Treatment of Malaria
Claire WallaceYoung Chemist in IndustryYoung Chemist in Industry
8th May 2013
ContentsContents
Why Malaria?
PfCDPK1: A Novel Target
Hit Identification and Early Lead
O i i i d S h i f I id id iOptimisation and Synthesis of Imidazopyridazines
In Vivo Results
Parasite Rate of Reduction Assay
Biotinylation Experimentsy p
Conclusion
Why Malaria?Why Malaria?
A major public health problem in more than 90 countries with combined
population 3.3 billion people (50% of the world’s population)
~220 million new infections and an estimated 660,000 deaths per year, p y
Mainly in Africa but incidence is growing in Asia and Latin America
Estimated incidence of malaria per 1000 population (2006)
Why Malaria?Why Malaria?
Emergence of drug resistance has compromised the therapeutic efficacyf t ti l i l dof most anti-malarial drugs
Artemisinin and derivatives, used incombination therapy, are currently the mainline of defence against drug-resistant malaria
Humans can be infected by 11 species, but two account for vastmajority of cases: Falciparum (~70%) & Vivax (~25%)j y p ( ) ( )
Life CyclePfCDPK1: A Novel TargetLife Cycle
Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are directly regulated by Ca2+ and are found in plants
PfCDPK1: A Novel Target
and organisms in the alveolate lineage, but they are absent in humans
PfCDPK1 is encoded by an essential gene expressed primarily in the merozoite
Responsible for phosphorylation of components of the molecular motor that drive parasite invasion
of red blood cells
Bl ki it i i t th it t ld i t f ith th lif l d t ti ll Blocking parasite invasion at the merozoite stage could interfere with the life cycle and potentially
allow the infection to be cleared
Hit IdentificationHit Identification
NN
NN
NH
NHO
NH2
IC50 = 60 nM
Hit series of Imidazopyridazines showed sub 100 nM IC50 values against CDPK1 and
strong inhibition of parasite growth
Concerns over high log D values, poor microsome stability and selectivity over
human kinases
Kinase Selectivity Panel:
10 µMKey: % inhibition >90: red, 70-90: yellow, <70: green
Hit to Early LeadHit to Early Lead
PfCDPK1 IC50 = 13 nM
P falciparum EC = 400 nM NNP. falciparum EC50 = 400 nM
Cytotox IC50 = 9 µM
Log D = 3.4
NN
NH
N
N
MLM 85 % rem
HLM 63 % rem
PAMPA = 81 nm/s
NH
PAMPA 81 nm/s
In vivo = 46 % reduction in parasitaemia (50 mg/kg dose orally)
Kinase Selectivity Panel:
Left hand side less important to binding affinityKey: % inhibition >90: red, 70-90: yellow, <70: green 1 µM
Introduction of a more basic side chain to improve ADME properties
Phenyl amide replaced with pyridyl isopentylamine which improved binding affinity Phenyl amide replaced with pyridyl isopentylamine which improved binding affinity
and kinase selectivityBioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2013, 23, 3064
Optimisation of ImidazopyridazinesOptimisation of Imidazopyridazines
A structure-based design approach using the homology model of PfCDPK1 was used
to attempt to gain increased binding affinity against the target and correspondingly
increase the cellular potencyp y
NN
N
NH
N
N
The model suggested that the binding pocket occupied by N
NH
the alkyl chain was not optimally filled
NN
N
N
N
Virtual libraries were enumerated with a range of groups
at this position and examined through dockingNN
H
N
NH
Model revealed 2-amino pyridines to have superior H
Nbinding energies
Optimisation of ImidazopyridazinesOptimisation of ImidazopyridazinesN
NN
N
N
NN
NN F
NH N
HN
Additional VDW interactions and fewer clashes
Improved electrostatic complementarity and additional H bondImproved electrostatic complementarity and additional H-bond
Reduced entropic penalty due to conformational focussing
Synthesis of ImidazopyridazinesSynthesis of Imidazopyridazines
O O
NN
N
ClB
N
NH2
O
N
NH
O
O
NN
N
Br
N
NH
O
O
NN
NN
NB
NH2
O
DIPEAPd(dppf)Cl2
Br Br
NN
NH2
DIPEANMP130 °C
57%
Cs2CO3THF/H2O
48%
NH
NH
NN
NN
ClF O
H HN
NH
NN
Ni)
H
NN
NH
N
F
H
NN
NH
N
FPd(OAc)2XantphosCs2CO3Dioxane
ii) HCl i Di
AcOHNa(OAc)3BHTHF
39%ii) HCl in Dioxane 24%
<5 steps A prerequisite for MMV collaboration <5 steps – A prerequisite for MMV collaboration
Testing the ModelTesting the Model
NNH2 NNH2 NNH2
NH
NN
N
NN
2
NH
NN
N
NN
2
NH
NN
N
NN
2
F
IC50 < 9 nM
EC50 = 465 nM
NH
NH
N
IC50 < 8 nM
EC50 = 83 nM
NH
N
IC50 < 8 nM
EC50 = 12 nMC50 65
Cytotox IC50 = 6.6 µM
Log D = 1.6
MLM 92 % rem
C50 83
Cytotox IC50 = 6.8 µM
Log D = 1.1
MLM 93 % rem
C50
Cytotox IC50 = >20 µM
Log D = 0.2
MLM 85 % rem
Introduction of a hydrogen bond acceptor ortho to amine showed a significant cellular
HLM 89 % rem
Pampa = 1.6 nm/s
HLM 89 % rem
Pampa = 0.3 nm/s
HLM 93 % rem
Pampa = 3.9 nm/s
efficacy boost
A further boost obtained by the introduction of a fluorine at the 3 position
Poor permeability, could be due to diaminocyclohexane?
Optimisation of Left Hand SideOptimisation of Left Hand Side
N
NNNH2
N
NN
NN
NN
NH
F
NH
NN
NN
NH
F
NH
NN
NN
NH
F
HN
IC50 = 44 nM
EC50 = Inactive
C t t IC 6 7 M
HN
IC50 = < 8 nM
EC50 = 13 nM
C toto IC >20 M
HN
IC50 = 13 nM
EC50 = 40 nM
C t t IC 5 9 M Cytotox IC50 = 6.7 µM
Log D = 2.5
MLM 92 % rem
HLM 82 % rem
Cytotox IC50 = >20 µM
Log D = 0.2
MLM 85 % rem
HLM 93 % rem
Cytotox IC50 = 5.9 µM
Log D = 1.4
MLM 85 % rem
HLM 98 % rem
Variation of left hand side to improve ADME properties
B i id h i i d th l ft h d id
Pampa = 137 nm/sPampa = 3.9 nm/s Pampa = 1.0 nm/s
Basic side chain required on the left hand side
Attempts to remove resulted in loss of cellular efficacy
A range of basic groups with varying pKa explored (lower pKa improved permeability)A range of basic groups with varying pKa explored (lower pKa improved permeability)
Trade off between good ADME and good efficacy!
Optimisation of LinkerOptimisation of Linker
N NN NN N N
NH
NN
N
F
N
NH
NN
N
N
F
N
NH
NN
NN
N
F
IC50 = 16 nM
NH
N
NH
N
IC50 = 9 nMIC50 = 13 nM
NH
N
EC50 = 406 nM
Cytotox IC50 = 3.2 µM
Log D = 3.2
MLM 47 %
EC50 = 388 nM
Cytotox IC50 = 0.5 µM
Log D = 3.1
MLM 57 %
EC50 = 40 nM
Cytotox IC50 = 5.9 µM
Log D = 1.4
MLM 85 % MLM 47 % rem
HLM 80 % rem
Pampa = 170 nm/s
MLM 57 % rem
HLM 77 % rem
Pampa = 63 nm/s
MLM 85 % rem
HLM 98 % rem
Pampa = 1.0 nm/s
Increasing Permeability
Decreasing Efficacy
In Vivo ResultsIn Vivo Results
IC50 (µM)
Cytotox v-50 (µM)
EC50 (µM)
HLM (%
rem)
MLM (%
rem)LogD
PAMPA Papp
(nm/s)
In vivo reduction in parasitaemia
(%)(µM) rem) rem) (nm/s) (%)
0.013 9.0 0.400 63 85 3.4 81 46N
N
NNN
H
N
NN
N
N
N
NH
0.016 3.2 0.390 80 47 3.2 171 44
NNH
NH
N
F
0.012 2.0 0.078 86 61 3.7 48 51
NN
N
NH
N
NH
F
NH
N Cl
N
NNN
H
N2H
<0.008 >20 0.013 93 85 0.2 4 4NN
NH
N
F
Parasite Rate of Reduction AssayParasite Rate of Reduction Assay
Quantifies number of parasites that remain viable after drug treatment
Parasites are treated with the selected drug at a concentration
corresponding to 10 x IC50 over 48 hoursp g 50
Dilutions are made and cultured for 21 days
Samples taken at 21 and 28 days to confirm number of viable parasites
Can group according to control compounds
Fast killers (chloroquine)
Moderate killers (pyrimethamine) Moderate killers (pyrimethamine)
Slow killers (atovaquone)
Parasite Rate of Reduction AssayParasite Rate of Reduction Assay
Controls
ites
+1)
able
par
asi
Slow/Moderate Killers
log
(via
F t KillFast Killer
Biotinylation ExperimentsBiotinylation Experiments
Used to determine other targets that a compound may interact with
Biotin is tethered to compound by a short linker and exposed to potential target
proteins
(Strept)Avidin has a high affinity for the biotin portion and can be used to “pull-out”
the proteins for which the compound has an affinity.
AVIDIN BEADAVIDIN BEAD
PRO
NH
NH
SO
H
H
TEIN
NH
COMPOUNDO
S
Biotinylation ExperimentsBiotinylation Experiments
NH
NH
SO
H
H
NHON
N
N
NH
O N
NH
NN
N
NHN
S
H
H
NH
NH
NN
N
H
NNH
NH
H
O
Assuming a similar binding mode biotin was tethered to the basic side chainAssuming a similar binding mode biotin was tethered to the basic side chain
However, a new target could mean a new binding mode
ConclusionConclusion
A series of PfCDPK1 inhibitors was identified from a high throughput
screen
Subsequent optimisation yielded potent, selective inhibitors with suitable
ADME and pharmacokinetic profiles
Testing in an in vivo efficacy model showed insufficient reduction in
parasitaemia for the project to progress further
On going investigation into off-target effects through biotinylation
experiments
Acknowledgements
MRCT NIMR
Acknowledgements
Simon OsborneTim ChapmanJon Large
Tony HolderJudith GreenBarbara Clough
Nathalie BoulocEla Smiljanic-Hurley
Munira Grainger
MMVKris Birchall
David Tickle
Didier LeroyPaul WillisSimon Campbell
Sadhia Mahmood
Keith AnsellSwiss TPH InstituteSergio Wittlin
Hayley JonesAlison LevyMichelle Raynor
Monash UniversitySue Charman
Debbie TaylorDavid Whalley
Karen White
Figure 5. Classical antimalarial killing rate profiles.
Sanz LM, Crespo B, De-Cózar C, Ding XC, et al. (2012) P. falciparum In Vitro Killing Rates Allow to Discriminate between Different A ti l i l M d f A ti PL S ONE 7(2) 30949 d i 10 1371/j l 0030949Antimalarial Mode-of-Action. PLoS ONE 7(2): e30949. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030949http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0030949