CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F
description
Transcript of CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F
![Page 1: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F
Fall 2005
Class 7
Personal Jurisdiction
September 7 2005
![Page 2: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Hurricane KatrinaDay of Prayer and Communion
• 8 p.m., Campus-wide Prayer Vigil, Columbus School of Law, Knights of Columbus Courtyard
• 9 p.m., Eucharistic Adoration, Caldwell Chapel
![Page 3: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Hurricane KatrinaVolunteers
If you are interested in volunteering to help the displaced veterans at the Armed Forces Retirement Home:
• please stop by the UCSPE office (Pryzbyla 204) and provide your name, contact information and the times you are able/willing to work on the sign-up sheet provided.
• Or you may send an e-mail with the same information to [email protected].
• You may also call 202-319-5291. Please indicate whether you have transportation and/or if
you are certified to operate university vehicles.
![Page 4: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
WRAP-UP: DIVERSITY
• You should understand the complete diversity and amount in controversy requirements
• You should know the traditional aggregation rules
![Page 5: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ANOTHER HYPO• Barbie (CA) and Ken (CA)
are equal partners in a dressmaking business called “High Heels”. Skipper (N.Y.) orders 4 ball gowns from them. Barbie and Ken make the gowns and deliver them to Skipper along with an invoice for $90,000. After 18 months, Skipper has not paid Barbie and Ken a cent.
![Page 6: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
HYPO CONTINUED
• Barbie and Ken’s lawyer, Dawn, files an action in federal court, naming High Heels as plaintiff and claiming the amount of the $90,000 debt in damages. Barbie and Ken, as equal partners, each have an interest of $45,000 in the claim. Does the federal court have subject matter jurisdiction even if it is a state law claim?
![Page 7: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
PENNOYER v. NEFF (1877)
• In this case, the Supreme Court made clear that due process clause set limits on court’s power to hear cases over non-resident defendants
• Pennoyer applied a traditional concept of jurisdiction, which required physical presence of the defendant or his property within the forum state or defendant’s consent
![Page 8: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
BREAKDOWN OF PENNOYER
• Pennoyer proved too confining as the nation’s economy expanded and, in particular, interstate trade grew
• Courts began to resort to legal fictions to permit personal jurisdiction over non-resident defendants who were not physically present in the forum state, such as “implied consent” or “constructive presence”
![Page 9: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
INTERNATIONAL SHOE Co. v. WASHINGTON (1945)
• LEADING MODERN CASE ON PERSONAL JURISDICTION
![Page 10: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
THE SUPREME COURT: MODERN STANDARD FOR PERSONAL JURISDICTION
• According to Chief Justice Stone, what is the modern standard for a state’s assertion of personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant?
![Page 11: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
P. 568 CB
• “But now that the capias ad respondendum has given way to personal service of summons or other form of notice, due process requires only that in order to subject a defendant to a judgment in personam, if he be not present within the territory of the forum, he have certain minimum contacts with it such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.”
![Page 12: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Capias ad respondendum
![Page 13: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
CB p. 571 Q4
In tern atio na l Sh oe
Unrelated Claims
Related Claims
SING LE ACT
Unrelated Claims
Related Claims
M ID-RANG E
Unrelated Claims
Related Claims
CO NTINUO U S
Chief Justice Stone's Formulation
![Page 14: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
GENERAL JURISDICTIONSPECIFIC JURISDICTION
In tern atio na l Sh oe
Unrelated Claims
Related Claims
SING LE ACT
Unrelated Claims
Related Claims
M ID-RANG E
Unrelated Claims
Related Claims
CO NTINUO U S
Chief Justice Stone's Formulation
![Page 15: CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTIONS C & F](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062322/5681514c550346895dbf6b9c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Justice Black
• Dissent