Civil Military RelationAUNG KO KO TOEKPS (MDY)

CIVIL – MILITARY RELATION

Systematically influence on Military Not study to Military Executive Regime

Approach Social Science Approach Political Science Approach

Law, Philosophy, Psychology, Economy, Military, Diplomacy, Media, History, etc…..

Scope of CMR

Relation between Civilian Groups and Armed Groups.

Legitimacy Problem Militant Culture Radical Trend – Revolution Poverty Trap Power Struggle

Relation with 3 Classes

Relation between MILITARY & Social Class

Elite Middle Class Fundamental Social Class

Class Model Show

Civilian Representative Region

People Political Party Civil Society Organization (CSOs) Civil Servants (Bureaucracy, Public

Administration) Citizen Ethnic Society Non-State Actors (in IR Fields)

Role of Sectors (FUNCTION)

Civiliana) For State Building

b) For Development

c) For State Power Military

I. For Defense

II. For Security & Stability

III. For deterrence to External Threats & Harms

STUDY To Military Preparation

Study on FOCUS Study on LEVEL Study on POWER Driven Factors Study on Psychology Study on Cultural & Educational Frame

What on Focus?

1) Internal Affair 2) External Affair

Civil War, Conflict - Stability Political, Religious, Ethnic, Economic or General

External Threat, Invasion Border Affair Hot War Condition Closely Position with Rough State.

Study to Military Level

Individual Level State Level International Level

a) Study to Military Leader – Personal Character

b) Study to Internal Structure of State Size, Geography, Ethnic Homogeneity & Economic and

Political Performance

c) Study to International System

Power Driven Factors

Military Power derives the size of a state’s Armed Forces, Quality & Quantity of Weaponry, Military Budget, Training (Education), Moral (Psychology), Organization Structure (Strategically), Leadership.

Civil Military Relation

Relation between ruling party and opposition groups in Myanmar.

Hardliner Reformer Moderate Radical

Nature of Differences

Nature of CivilianA. Norm (right things do)B. EthnicC. FlexibilityD. Multicultural E. Diversity & PluralistF. Soft & Smart PowerG. PoliticsH. Partnership

Nature of Military1) Aggressive2) Rigid3) Focus on Security4) Interest 5) Hierarchy 6) Order7) Do things right8) Homogeneous 9) Hard Power (Armed)

Civilian Military OutputStrong Weak Civilian Control

Strong Strong Wealth State(or) instability

Weak Weak Fail State / Weak Regime

Weak Strong Military Regime

How Condition in Myanmar

Main Theme Factor.

Civilian control of the military, Military professionalism, War, Civil-military operations, Military institutions

Western CLAUSEWITZ

Eastern SUNZU (China)

Military Professionalism

Such as (in Military Field) Scholar Academic Person Educated

- Ethnic base, Norm base, Skill Full base, Functional base :

- Professional Characteristics of Army.

History

Individual Family Clan Tribe Nation City State State Empire Union - United

History Background

Warlord King Emperor (Lord of Kings)

Field MarshalGeneral

PresidentPrime Minister

Two Era.

War & Peace

War Era Peace Era

Peace is the preparation period in order to become war cause.

Relation/Reform/Reconnect

5 R (Five RRRRR) Recognition Respect Road your Self Responsibility Reconciliation

Awareness Factor

- Isolation Cover1) Self Financial2) Self Engineering3) Self Health4) Self Education

More Interdependence, Best RelationTARGET; Civilian Control Government.

Civilian Control

Dependent – Budget, Technology Must be have Military Science Technocrat at

Civilian Representative Parliament or Cabinet. Capacity of Military Affair Democratic Standard Change to Militant Culture

See a human Such as Realistic HumanStudy to Human Nature.

THE END