CIV LIT PARA 97(a) FINAL EXAM STUDY GUIDE

Negligence Fraud Para Paralegal

o Holds himself out as paralegalo Is qualified by education, experience or trainingo Performs substantive legal worko Under supervision of an attorney

CE req’s Every two years:

o 4 hours ethicso 4 hours general or specific legal education

civil litigation:o lawsuit between individuals or entitieso as opposed to criminal prosecution

actiono the lawsuit

allegationo statements asserted as truth

Alternative Dispute Resolutiono dispute resolution process short or trial, to expedite resolution

Arbitration ADR process:

o Each party presents its case to a neutral arbitratoro There is a discovery processo Is more formal than mediationo Can be binding or non-binding

Meditation ADR process:

1

o Neutral mediator facilitates communication between parties to achieve mutually acceptable settlement

o Less formal than Arbitration Pleading:

o A formal document in which a party to a lawsuit sets forth or responds to allegations, claims, denials, or defenses.

o Pleading Paper 28 lined paper used for court correspondences

o Body The meat of the pleading

o Caption The attorney’s personal information; Name of party on whose behalf the document is prepared; Name of Court where the action is pending; Titles of action; Case number; Title of document

o Prayer for relief Last part of pleading; asks court to grant relief in its favor “WHEREFORE”…

Cause of actiono Legal theory on which the case is brought

Complainto Filed by plaintiffo Stated allegations, against whom, and prayer for relief

Venue:o The place where the trial is held: do not confuse with JX

Courts:o State: trial, court of appeal (district); supremeo Fed: trial (district); court of appeal (circuit); supremeo Trial courts have ‘original jurisdiction’ – where the case originates

2

o Appellate courts do not; they only hear cases, and issues, that come from lower courts

Federal courts in CA

o Article III: Judicial power in one Supreme court with the authority to create inferior courts

o US district courts are the trial courts

CA has Four federal judicial districts

Hears fed question and diversity cases

o District courts of appeal = circuit courts

13 throughout US

Ninth Circuit = CA, OR, WA, NV, ID, AZ, Alaska, Hawaii, Guam, and Northern Marianna Islands

o Federal JX

Over questions of federal law

The US as a party

Complete diversity and $75k in dispute

US Supreme court

o Reviews Circuit court decisions and State Supreme Court decisions involving Federal questions

o Certiorari

o FRCP

CA Courts

o Three levels: Superior; courts of appeal; supreme

3

o Superior Courts

Two types of trial courts and one appellate court

Small claims: up to $10,000 for individuals; 5K for Corps; 7.5K for automobile cases

Limited JX

Unlimited JX

Superior court appellate Department

Appeals from Limited JX superior court

o Courts of Appeal

Review decisions of trial courts

CA has six districts for courts of appeal

o Supreme court

Power to depublish

o Administrative courts

i.e. Unemployment insurance court

some allow non-lawyers to represent clients

CIV LIT 97a LBN Ch 1

These notes are merely supplemental: You are expected to know the material; at the review sessions for the exams, I will give you areas for focus, but you must understand the nuts and bolts.

Summons:o Explained at 1.2.6o Remember: the action is commenced with the filing of the complaint

with the court: the complaint sets out the allegations against the ∆

4

o The summons is not a part of the complaint is not a pleading The summons is: an official order from the court requiring the

∆ to respond to the complaint. Service:

o Summons must be served on ∆ Any competent adult, not a party to the action In CA

Personal delivery Substituted delivery

o Left with specific individuals at authorized locations; follow with mailing in CA; not required in Fed Court

By mail By publication

o Return of service Completed by party who served the summons and complaint Filled out after service and is the proof of service, supported by

affidavit filed with courto Summons directs ∆ to serve an answer within a deadline

Fed 21 days CA: 30 days from date of service of process to file an

answer Failure = default

o Who may serve: any person, not a party to the action, who is at least 18 y/o

Filing Complaint and Issuing Summonso Clerk “files” complaint: stamps w/ date and case numbero Summons is “issued”: Clerk signs, dates, stamps

But: you must still file Proof of Service of Summons within 60 days, or face penalties

5

This is done after you serve the defendant with the Summons and Complaint

To ∆ in some cases:o Personal injury: Statement of Damages

Not filed with court; sent to Defendant with summons and complaint – however, not mandatory that it be sent at that time

o Limited civil: Case Questionnaire A way to promote settlement before trial

Proof of service:o After service, fill out POS, and file an original and a copy with the

court Dates to Calendar:

o Date of service: when the summons was delivered to ∆; or ten days after mailing; = receipt date

o 30 days after receipt date, ∆’s response is due; = default dateo 10 days after default date; last day to file a request for entry of

default For service by Mail

o Additional form: Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt Top half: Notice: tells ∆ to respond, or have to pay for

additional service Bottom half: “Acknowledgment of Receipt” Include SASE; two copies of Notice and Acknowledgment; one

copy of summons; one copy of complaint; one copy of any other docs

o Date to calendar: 30 days after sending: check for response

If ∆ did has not sent back the Notice and Acknowledgment, you must continue to attempt service by another means

6

o If serving Outside California by mail, used certified mail Service by publication

o By court ordero Move the court for order demonstrating that service cannot “with

reasonable diligence” be made in any other mannero Fill out an “Application for Publication”o Fill out an “Order for Publication”

This will be signed by the judge; To make life easy, you file this with the motion requesting the

ordero To the newspaper:

One copy of the signed order and one copy of the summons A SASE, requesting an “Affidavit of Publication” Paper will publish for four consecutive weeks, then send you

the “Affidavit” backo Dates to Calendar

The date the ∆ was ‘deemed served’ The notice period starts on first day of publication and

ends on 28th day; End of period ∆ is ‘deemed served’

30 days from ‘deemed served’ date for ∆’s response 10 days after that is last day to enter request for entry of

defaulto If you find the ∆’s address during notice period:

You must mail the notice, and file a declaration that it was mailed

Extending time for service:o Ex parte application to court, before time has expired, with

declaration

JURISDICTION

7

Jurisdiction is divided into two branches:

1: Subject matter jurisdiction:

Refers to the court’s power over a particular type of case

2: Personal Jurisdiction:

The ability of a court that has subject matter jurisdiction to exercise power over a particular defendant or item of property

Limitations on Personal Jurisdiction:

Limitations arise from two sources: o State statutes and the US Constitutiono An exercise of Personal JX cannot exceed either source

Statutory Limitationso States have to power to decide over whom the courts may exercise

JXo Start with state statutes:

No statute = no JX If a statute exists granting JX, then it is probably valid, but: then look to the US Constitution: statute cannot exceed US

Const.o Constitutional Limitations

Due process clause places two restrictions on the exercise of PJX

∆ must have sufficient contacts with the forum state such that JX would be fair and reasonable;

∆ must be given appropriate notice and an opportunity to be heard

Federal JX Unless a rule states otherwise, each Fed court must

analyze JX as if it were a court of the state in which it is located

8

THREE TYPES OF PERSONAL JX

In personam JXo In presonam JX exists when the forum has the power over the person

of a particular defendant. What about π JX?

o The court may render $ judgment against the ∆, or order that ∆ perform or refrain from performing some act(s)

o Full faith and Credit Judgment can be enforced in any state of the US, and against

property held in any State In Rem JX

o The court has the power to adjudicate the rights of all persons in the world with respect to a particular item of property

o Property in question must be within the physical borders of the stateo Applies to:

Condemnation (eminent domain cases) Forfeiture of property to the state (used for criminal purposes) Settlement of decedent’s estate

Quasi in Rem JXo When court has the power to determine whether particular

individuals own specific property within the court’s controlo However, it does not permit the court to determine the rights of all

persons in the world with respect to the property ∆ is not bound personally Cannot be enforced against any other property owned by ∆

STATUTORY LIMITATIONS ON IN PERSONAM JX

State statutes grant JX in the following circumstances:

9

1. Where the ∆ is present in the forum state and is personally served with process;

2. Where the ∆ is domiciled in the forum state3. Where the ∆ consents to JX4. Where the ∆ has committed acts that bring him within the forum

state’s long arm statutes Physical presence

If served with process while within borders of the state, no matter how fleetingly

Need not be related to COA Exceptions to traditional rule

Fraud or Force Party or witness immunity

Domicile Is where a person makes her home: Presence (even for a moment); plus, Intention to make that place her home

Consent Express consent

By K By appointment of agent

Implied consent By engaging in in-state activity, i.e. driving within a state

Voluntary Appearance By contesting a case without challenging JX first Hence: the Special Appearance

LONG ARM STATUTES

In personam JX over those non-residents who perform or cause to be performed certain acts within the state. Served in or outside forum.

1. Most states limit reach by statute2. CA has an Unlimited Long Arm Statute

It is limited only by the federal constitution

10

Constitutional limitations on in personam Long Arm JX1. Sufficient contacts with the forum: contact and fairness

Contact: International Shoe requires that ∆ have such minimum

contacts that JX would be fair and reasonable: Two factors: Purposeful Availment and Foreseeability

Purposeful Availment: Contacts cannot be accidental ∆ purposefully availed herself of the

privilege of conducting activities within the forum state, invoking the benefits and protections of its laws

Stream of commerce caseso Difficult; however: purposeful

availment and foreseeability are the hallmarks

Foreseeability ∆ Must know, or reasonably

anticipate that her activities in the forum render it foreseeable that she may be HALED into court there

2. Fairness Cannot offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial

justice” Relatedness of Claim to Contact

The closer the relation, the more likely JX is fair and reasonable

Systematic and continuous activity in the forum state If established, court could find this activity sufficient for

JX over any COA, not just those related to the contacto This is general in personam JX

If less than systematic and continuous, then only those related to the activity give rise to PJX

11

o This is specific JX Diversity of citizenship JX

1. District courts shall have original JX for civil actions over 75K in controversy; and

2. Citizens of different states Must have complete diversity: Ever π must be of diverse

citizenship of every ∆ For humans: citizenship is same as domicile

Child = that of parents Class actions

Decided by the named memebers For corporations:

Deemed a citizen of any (every) state of incorporation; and

State where it has its principal place of business

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND VENUE

SMJX: The power of a court to adjudicate a matter before it; not to be confused with: Venue: relates to the proper district in which to bring the action.

SMJX is a question of power or authority; Venue is a question of convenience

SMJX cannot be conferred by agreement; Venue can

VENUE:

Fed:o Venue is proper in:

A judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state; or

A judicial district in which the events or omissions occurred. Residence:

o Individuals Residence = domicile

12

o Corporations In any judicial district in which it is subject to personal

jurisdiction Transfer:

o Where original venue is proper: Transfer to another district where the action “might have been

brought” Convenience of parties/witnesses

Forum selection clause in contract; Is one factor, along with: convenience and interests of

justice o Where original venue was improper:

Where venue was improper and the only option is to dismiss Transfer is better than dismissal (usually) Transferee court must have PJX and SMJX Standard: the interests of justice

Transfer is change of venue within system; Removal is from state to Federal Court; Remand is from higher to lower court.

Venue in California

In California, venue refers to the county in which an action may be tried. Improper venue may be waived if no timely objection is made.

Local actionso The county in which the land, or some portion of it, is located;

Transitory actionso Action that can be brought in any venue where the ∆ can be

personally served with processo In any county in which any ∆ resides at commencement of actiono If no ∆ resides in CA, venue is proper in any countyo Contract actions

13

In the county where the obligation is to be performed; or Where the contract was entered into

o Personal injury/wrongful death Venue also proper in county where injury occurred

Against corps, associations, and partnershipso Corp:

County in which K is made or to be performed; or in which breach occurs

County In which obligation or liability arises County where corp has its principal place of business

o Assoc’s and P’ships Entity’s principal place of business, if on file with sec of state;

or, Where a member/partner resides

Transfer of venueo ∆ only can move for transfer, if venue is impropero If venue is proper, court may change venue on motion or sua sponte,

if: Reason to believe impartial trial cannot be done in original

county Convenience of witness and ends of justice would be

promoted; There is no judge of the court qualified to act

CIV LIT PARA 97(A) CH 3 GREEN

Primary and Secondary sources of lawo Primary:

State and federal constitutions; State, federal, and local statutes; Case law, state and federal

o Secondary The restatements (Restatement of Contracts Second)

14

Models for states to use in crafting their own laws, but referred to for clarity and support

Legal encyclopedias Dictionaries Treatises (formal essays on subjects) Law review articles Legal journals

Hierarchy of Authority:o Constitutions

Fed supremacy clauseo Statutory law

Fed over state; state over localo Administrative law

Administrative agencies with power of rule and regulation; some also have investigative and adjudicative power.

EEOCo Common law

Explain Here: case law

Precedent and stare decisiso Conflict of laws:

Judicial review The law is what the SC says the law is

Concurrent power In areas where both the state and the fed government

have authority; when the conflict is real, the fed law prevails.

Remedieso Legalo Equitable

Substantive law

15

o The laws themselves: what conduct is proscribed; what are the elements of a prima facie case

o Think: the substance of the law Procedural law:

o How the laws are carried out; o By what procedure is a person brought to trial in criminal law;o What processes must be followed in a civil trialo Think: the process by which the substantive law is put into practiceo Without procedure, there are no rights – it is that important

Criminal Law v Civil Lawo Criminal law defines the proscribed behavior and establishes

punishment: punishment sets it aparto Civil Law

Protects the rights and obligations of private persons (natural) and business entities

Does not include punishment But, punitive damages fall under civil law

To clarify your green book: p. 6 lists the code sections as though they are

purely/only applicable in a civil law context: e.g. Health and Safety, vehicle…

CIV LIT PARA 97(A) CH 4 GREEN

Pre litigation analysis: First Contact Through Filingo Does the case have merit

It is an ethical violation to take on a case that lacks merit; but…o If so, then:

What are the potential claims What relief

To client: What is your best case scenario outcomeo What is acceptableo What is unacceptable

16

Who is the proper π Who to name as ∆’s In what court

o Before complaint, facts are checked and allegations investigated Do not assume the client is telling the truth

Complaint and summons ∆’s response

o Defaulto Answer

Or special appearance to challenge JXo Demurrer/motion to strikeo If alleging affirmative defenses, must do so in Answer, or they are

waived Affirmative Defenses:

New matter, which, assuming the complaint to be true, constitutes a defense to it;

o True = the facts, not the legal conclusion; e.g. : Yes, I hit the guy; however, it is not

battery because I stuck him in self defenseo others:

accord and satisfaction, assumption of risk, duress;

insanity, coerciono Demurrer or MTS

General Demurrer Pleading fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a

cause of action; Court lacks SMJX

Special Demurrer Lack of legal capacity; Defect or misjoinder of parties;

17

Uncertain pleading (same as Fed motion for more definitive pleading)

Motion to strike As to some portion of complaint or answer

Cross-Complaint Court’s response

o Court can grant or deny demurrer; with or without prejudice Amended pleadings

o Frequently done, both voluntarily or when court grants demurrer w/out prejudice

Discoveryo Pretrial devices that can be used by one party to obtain facts from

the other party to prepare for trial Depositions Interrogatories (Rogs) Requests for production (RFP’s); docs and things Requests for admission Physical and mental exams Requests to enter property

Motionso A formal application made to the court to obtain a rule or order

directing some act be done in favor of the applicanto Law and Motion calendaring

Specific dates to clear motions and move the litigation forwardo Motions in limine

At beginning of trial; protective orders against prejudicial evidence or statements

Post-trial motionso Attorney’s feeso New trialo Reduce judgment

Appeal

18

o Losing party claims errors of procedure or application Enforcement of Judgment

o When losing party fails to pay/performo Liens, levy’s, contempt

CIV LIT PARA 97(a) Ch 5 GREEN (most)

Confidentialityo In CA: part of oatho Protects all information from any disclosure related to

representation, regardless of where or when derivedo Differs from A/C privilege: A/C priv applies only to communications

made during course of relationship and only covers formal testimonyo Exceptions to Confidentiality:

Compelled by law or court order; To collect attorney’s fees To defend against IAC claim Allows, but does not require:

When necessary to prevent a criminal act that will cause death or substantial bodily injury

A/C privilegeo Client is holder

A person, or entity, seeking legal services Extends to representatives of clients

o Attorney One reasonably believed by client to be so Extends to agents of

o Corporate A/C privilege Old rule: control group Recent: if information divulged was gained during the course

of corporate dutieso Examination by doctor

19

If examined at attorney’s request, A/C priv attaches; not physician patient

o Duration Indefinite Outlasts representation and life

o Non-applicability Future wrongdoing Dispute between attorney and client

Conflicts of interesto PL’s bring conflicts from their pasto Concurrent conflicts

Representation of one client is directly adverse to the interests of another; or,

There is a significant risk that the representation of a client will be materially limited by a lawyer’s personal interests, or those of another client; former client; or third person

Consent Clients can consent to waive conflict; Written, informed consent; court approval if challenged

o Imputed conflicts If one lawyer in a firm is conflicted, that conflict is imputed to

all others in the firm Screening

If conflicted lawyer is timely screened; Does not share in fee; Potentially conflicted former clients are notified;

o Actual confidential information If gleaned from representation, you are conflicted

o Specific Conflicts Financial interest adverse to client

Unless:o Fair and reasonable;

20

o Fully disclosed with opportunity to seek independent counsel;

o Written consent Improper use of information

Cannot use Designation oneself as beneficiary

Unless related to done Substantial gift when preparing instrument

Assumption of undue influence Media Rights

CA does not follow model: if client waives and court accepts

Financial assistance CA ban is very broad: no financial assistance to clients,

except court costs up front Proprietary interest in outcome of case

Cannot have, but can take case on contingency fee No file liens in CA

Sex with client: CA is less strict than model rules

o Can’t demand it;o No coercion or undue influence;o Can’t let it interfere with competent

representationo Former clients

Cannot accept representation that is materially adverse to a former client’s interests; and

Cannot if lawyer gleaned material information from adverse client

o Prospective clients Ban extends to prospective clients regarding any and all

received information

21

Extends to initial consultation Muddying the waters

Standingo A person must have a concrete stake in the outcome of a caseo Components

Injury in fact; Causation; Redressability

Decision in litigant’s favor must be capable of eliminating grievance

o Exceptions Guardian ad litem Class actions – sort of Child support: county can sue on behalf of parent

Capacityo Adult and Competent o Emancipated minors o Fugitives lack capacity

Considering COA’so What elements much be met;o What evidence is required for each elemento How to obtain that evidenceo Sources of information

The client Third parties

First-hand witnesses Experts Opposing party

o Book mentions, but be sure to check with client first;

22

o Once opposing party has counsel, cannot contact party directly, at all

Docs and thingso When to sue

Learn SOL’s : Ch 5, p 11

Boschetto v. Hansing, (2008) 539 F. 3d. 1011

1015

Discovery: π wanted more; court declined as request was insufficiently supported

De novo review ∆’s filed motion to dismiss: π bears burden of production California’s long-arm statute = federal standards (coextensive with) Minimum contacts; fair play and substantial justice COA’s

o Violation of Consumer Protection Acto Breach of Ko Misrepresentationo Fraud

1016

General and specific JXo Here only specific

RULE:o 3 part test

1. Purposefully direct, consummate with forum; or Perform some act by which he purposefully avails,

invoking benefits and protections2. Claim must relate to forum-related activities; and3. JX must comport with fair play and substantial justice

(reasonable)

23

o When π establishes one and two, ∆ must make showing that JX is not reasonable

Purposeful direction/Purposeful availment

1017

Qualitative Analysiso We are guided by the Supreme Court… (precedent)

Analysis:o Lone transaction does not establish P.A.o No ongoing obligations

One-shot affair

1018

Sliding scale analysis of interactive website Why is Cybersell inapplicable?

o b/c we are not concerned with JX over ebay π does not allege that ∆’s are regular users of ebay

o should π have inquired about the business website? (yes)o jurisdictional significance if site maintains ongoing contact with

forum state

1019

Distinction regular users of ebay (systematic) One time K; no substantial connection Π’s ease does not determine

o But, ebay does not create a moat Analysis:

o Facts of this case – one time transactiono Dispositive…

1020

Rule: standard of review

24

o Abuse of discretiono Actual and substantial prejudice to litigant

Does the Boucher website conduct sales? Would that matter? Could π have drafted a better complaint?

o What should he have included? (that ∆’s did regular business on ebay)

Concurrence

Individually targeting residents CA” Long –arm statute extends to limits of DP

1021

Random, fortuitous, attenuated contacts Substantial connection Purposefully directs (effects test)

1. Intentional act;2. Expressly aimed;3. Causes harm that he knows is likely to be suffered

1022

∆ had no control over highest bidder’s location ∆ required buyer to get the car Foreseeable participation by Californian not enough

CIV LIT 97a LBN Ch 2

THIS CHAPTER HAS GREAT INFO ON CALENDARING

Vocab:

Know: o Attorney of record

Currently representing a given party

25

Creates duties and binds attorney to rules regarding ending representation

o Calendar day/court dayo Electronic

Filer Filing electronically directly with the court

o Directly or through agent/service Notification

o Notification that a doc is served; provides hyperlink to doc

Electronic service: o must be “allowed”o Service by electronic transmission to an electronic

service addresso Two day extension: each way

Watch out: courts list midnight deadlines, but the two day deadlines is a 5:00 pm close of business deadline.

o Supplemental e-service is being required by some courts

o Email the service, or a hyperlink to the serviceo For proof of service on efile

May be made by any manner, plus: The electronic address used Date sent to e address Use electronic address on the POS Statement that service was electronic

Proof of service in practiceo Most lawyers and firms have a template; buto There is one general and three specific POS forms at the Judicial

Counsel site READ 2.6 – 2.9

26

Calendaring steps: program: deadlines.como Identify the triggering evento Identify what deadlines are triggeredo Identify what rules must be met: CRC, California Civil Procedure, local

court rules Identify the events that which define the time period in

question If you are filing a motion with the court, calendar notice

date/deadline; response deadline; o You will have liquid dates: you will need to

respond to responses, but you will not know the exact deadlines until you have been noticed

For a hearing date: count backward from the hearing date and calendar all events

o Exclude the hearing date Specifics

o Deadline: To serve ∆ and file POS: CRC 3.110 To serve response to rogs: CCP §2030.260 To move to compel further responses to rogs: CCP §2030.300 To serve notice of motion, opposition, and responses to

motions: CCP §1005(b) AND CCP §12c Remember:

o responses do not need to be received by the service deadline; they need to be served by that deadline;

o remember Cesar Chavez!o Limited service day = open court dayo Weekends are treated as holidays: you move the date to the next

closest non-holiday; remember whether you are counting forward or backward; and court days and calendar days

o Receipt date – the other party: is the date of service PLUS the additional days dictated by the form of service

27

The triggering date becomes the receipt date, regardless of when the party actually received it

When in doubt, always use the earlier date.o Counting backward

With hearing dates: if you have 16 days to serve before a hearing; you must count 16 days – subtracted from the hearing date, and subtract the additional days for the form of notice to reach recipient;

THE CHARTS ON 2-28 AND 2-31 ARE VERY HELPFUL

CIV LIT 97a LBN CH 3

WALKING THROUGH DEFAULT

Default: failure to respond to a complaint (or appear at a hearing) Default Judgment: decision regarding rights of parties after defendant

defaults Due date: date by which a doc must be filed and served Entry of default: notation by the clerk of the court regarding ∆’s failure to

respond/appear 1st step:

o Request clerk to enter the ∆’s default in the court file Mandatory Form: “Request for Entry of Default” Blocks ∆ from responding, without successful motion to set

aside default Is a vital part of calendaring and completing

If ∆ defaults, π is expected to file, and is exposed to sanctions for failure to do so

2nd step:o Obtain default judgmento Default Judgment entered by Clerk:

28

o Clerk can enter Default Judgment (CCP § 585(a)) in cases that: Case arises from contract; or Case has a judgment; and Damages are in a fixed, determinable amount; and The summons was not served by publication

o Court must enter Default Judgment (CCP § 585(b)) when: Service was by publication; or Amount is to be determined

Before filing, contact local court for reject list/ check sheet Form: “Request for Entry of Default” CIV – 100 pg’s 3-5 and 3-6 LBN

o Allows for steps one and two to be done simultaneously or noto NOTE: default judgments are not entered against active military ∆’s;

always check, and check the box (section 8) Service of request for Entry of Default

o Once signed: Mail a copy to each defaulting ∆/ ∆’s attorney

After a copy of the Request for Entry of Default” has been served (mailed), original is filed with court clerk

o This is now added to the court file for your case;o Must already contain:

Proof of service of summons Statement of damages for personal injury

With its own POS Obtaining Default Judgment

o Must prove entitlement to the damageso Submit written declaration: court may require a “prove-up” hearingo Submit with Proposed Judgment

Proposed Judgment (Jud – 100): For simple cases

Pleading paper pg 9-11 in LBN o Submitting

C.R.C. 3.1800

29

Brief summary of case (for Court Judgments) Declarations and docs

o i.e. the contract Interest Computations (if seeking) Memorandum of Costs and Disbursements (part of form,

and not as difficult as it sounds) Declaration on non-military status A Dismissal

o “Request for Dismissal” form For all parties against whom judgment is

not sought Exhibits

o Check with court, may require Request for attorney’s fees

o Court may have schedule of fees applicable to your case

Make copies of everything

File with the courtCIV LIT 97a LBN CH 4

THE DEFENDANT APPEARS

Answero 30 day limit may be extended, by:o One 15 day by stipulation without court involvemento After that, by courto Calendaring for Defendant

Date complaint was filed Date of service and 30 days after All appearance dates, including:

Case Management Conference Final status conference Trial date

30

Demurrero Arguing that Complaint is defectiveo If demurrer is denied, ∆ has ten days to file answer

Time begins as of date of service of court’s ruling Motion to dismiss

o Standing, JX, Motion to quash

o Arguing that service or process of service was defective Motion to strike

o Specific aspects of complaint Cross complaint

o Filed by defendant: he becomes cross-complainant Complex or Not Complex

o If π has filed the case as complex, the discovery rules are changed and allow for more time consuming discovery;

o So, if you do not agree that case is complex, there is a form: Using Civil Case Cover Sheet, CM-010, check the box near the

top that says: Complex Case Designation, and check: COUNTER Is now a “Counter Case Cover Sheet”

The captiono Matches the complaint exactly, except for the title – the part below

the case #o Title: DEFENDANT’S (S’) ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FOR ____o VERIFIED or not: some attorneys state in the Caption

If the complaint if “verified” the answer must be also You are swearing to the accuracy of statements; ergo, you

must state if you do not know If verified, no general denials

o LBN has Dept and Judge: you will not always know this at this point The Body

o DEFENDANT, TERRY ELLIS, ANSWERS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AS FOLLOWS:

31

o Respond to each COA, staring your numbered paragraphs with the first response

o Any material allegations not denied are deemed admittedo AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

Follow responses to COA’s with consecutive numbering Filing and serving answer

o Same procedure as filing complaint o $ for Defendant’s appearance fees: can vary; court clerk will tell you

Counterclaimso Compulsory and permissiveo Compulsory

Same transaction or occurrence as π’s; must be pleaded as a counterclaim or be barred

o Permissive Against same π, but from different transaction or occurrence

o In CA: The Cross Complaint Do not confuse with Cross-Claim: that is against a fellow

defendanto Filed with the answer to the complaint

Unless you are cross-suing a non-party; then you have until trial date is set

o “Cross Complainants” and “Cross Defendants”o Cross Complainants allege that Plaintiff, Cross Defendant Benjamin Laney, is in

material Breach of Contract pursuant to the terms of a written agreement between Cross Complainant McBay International Inc., and Cross Defendant Laney

o Format Note: The double box party names

o Filing and service If filing against a party: You are not bringing anyone new into

the case Same process as filing a complaint, and it is filed with

the answer If filing against a non-party

32

Summons must be prepared, issued, and served to bring cross-defendant into action

Preparing the packageo Make copies of the summons and cross complaint; o Good practice to attach a copy of the complainto File with court clerk o If against a party, court will serveo If against a non-party

Must serve as if new complaint and POS must be filed with the court;

Must also serve a copy of the complaint; a copy of any answer;

Responding to cross complainto Cross defendant has 30 days to respondo Is exactly the same as responding to a complaint

CIV LIT 97(a) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LECTURE

Liability of a supplier of a defective product to someone injured by the product

Five base theorieso Intento Negligenceo Strict liabilityo Implied warranties

Merchantability Fitness for a particular purpose

o Representation theories Express warranty Misrepresentation

Common elementso Π must show:

33

A defect; and, Existence of the defect when the product left ∆’s control

Types of defectso Manufacturing

Emerges different and more dangerous than the products made properly

o Design When all products of a line are the same, but have dangerous

propensitieso Inadequate warnings

Failure to give adequate warnings as to the risk involved in using a product that may not be apparent to users

Drugs/medical devices Warnings given to ‘learned intermediaries’ usually

suffice Proving defect

o Manufacturing Product failed to perform as safely as an ordinary customer

would expect ∆ must anticipate reasonable misuse

Test applies to defective food productso Design

∆ could have made product safer, without serious impact to the product’s price or utility

o Government safety standards Noncompliance with establishes that it is defective; but, Compliance with safety standards is evidence (and only

evidence), but not conclusive, that the product is not defectiveo Scientifically unknowable risks

∆ not liable for damages not knowable at the time of marketing

o Unavoidably unsafe products

34

No liability if the danger is apparent and there is no safer way to make the product

Existence of defect when product left ∆’s controlo Will be inferred from Normal channels of distribution

Liability based on intento If ∆ intended consequences or knew that they were substantially

certain to occuro Privity is not required

Liability based on negligenceo Duty is owed to any foreseeable π

Users; Consumers; bystanderso Chain of supply liable

Manufacturers; wholesalers; retailerso Breach of duty

Negligent conduct of ∆ leading to; The supplying of a defective product Proof of negligence

Same as standard Π can invoke Res ipsa loquitor

Wholesalers and retailers Duty satisfies with cursory inspection

o Causation Intermediary’s failure to discover does not supersede

manufacturer’s, unless; Unless intermediary’s exceeds foreseeable negligence

o Damage Physical or property must be shown

Strict liability in torto Why is it called this?

To distinguish from product liability in warranty Warranty liability can be limited by disclaimer: as is, etc. Liability in tort alleviates privity and evidentiary burdens

35

o Any merchant who sells a product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer or to his property

o A strict duty owed by a commercial supplier or a product;o Production or sale of a defective product;o Causationo Damageso Duty

∆ has duty so provide safe productso Π’s

No privity required Much reach π w/ No substantial alterations Does not extend to services

o Any commercial supplier Does not extend to casual sellers

o Production or sale Dangerous beyond expectation of ordinary consumer Retailers may be held liable even with no opportunity to

inspecto Comparative negligence applieso Disclaimers are irrelevant

Merchantability and Fitness/particular purposeo Merchantability: applies to all goods sold

Acceptable quality and generally fit for intended purposeo Fitness/particular purpose

When seller knows or has reason to know the particular purpose for which the goods will be used; and

Buyer is relying on seller’s superior knowledgeo Breach

In either case, warranty is breached and ∆ is liable Proof of fault unnecessary

o Disclaimers Valid for property loss; not for personal injury

36

Representation theorieso Express warranty

Affirmation of fact or promise that becomes part of the basis of the bargain

Privity not required as long as someone relied on the claim(s)o Breach

Fault need not be shown; Π only shows that product did not live up to warranty

o Disclaimer Could be valid, but would have to be consistent with warranty

o Misrepresentation of fact Fraud

CIV LIT 97a AMENDED PLEADINGS

Amended pleadingso Changing a pleading after it has been served or filedo Amendments can and do occur at all stages of litigationo CA: party may amend a complaint once as a matter of right Before an

answer or demurrer is filedo After that, must obtain leave of the court by motion; liberally granted

Relation back: that an act done at a later time is deemed to have occurred at an earlier time

refers to the date the complaint was originally filed for purposes of SOL

Amending to add new COA against already named defendant:o Relation back applies if the new COA is based on the same general

set of facts Amending to add a new ∆

o If SOL has not run, then amendment is allowed to add new ∆ No need to refer to relation back doctrine

o If SOL has run, then usually not allowed, unless:

37

Relation back in cases of mistake in CA court: Can to correct typos, but not to create new ∆’s Can, under equitable estoppel, π may be allowed to

allowed to correct a mistake in naming a closely related entity for the true ∆

o California DOE amendments: Allowed: if:

Timely filed and contains charging allegations against all defendants, including the DOES;

Π must be genuinely ignorant of the true names of the DOE defendants;

Π’s ignorance must be pleaded in the complaint; Given all three above, π has three years from original

filing to discover identities of DOE defendants and serve them with the complaint

38

39